Expanded Molecular Testing on Patients with Suspected West Nile Virus Disease

Most diagnostic testing for West Nile virus (WNV) disease is accomplished using serologic testing, which is subject to cross-reactivity, may require cumbersome confirmatory testing, and may fail to detect infection in specimens collected early in the course of illness. The objective of this project...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-09, Vol.19 (9), p.69-693
Hauptverfasser: Lindsey, Nicole P., Messenger, Sharon L., Hacker, Jill K., Salas, Maria L., Scott-Waldron, Christine, Haydel, Danielle, Rider, Errin, Simonson, Sean, Brown, Catherine M., Patel, Pinal, Smole, Sandra C., Neitzel, David F., Schiffman, Elizabeth K., Palm, Jennifer, Strain, Anna K., Vetter, Sara M., Nefzger, Brian, Fischer, Marc, Rabe, Ingrid B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 693
container_issue 9
container_start_page 69
container_title Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)
container_volume 19
creator Lindsey, Nicole P.
Messenger, Sharon L.
Hacker, Jill K.
Salas, Maria L.
Scott-Waldron, Christine
Haydel, Danielle
Rider, Errin
Simonson, Sean
Brown, Catherine M.
Patel, Pinal
Smole, Sandra C.
Neitzel, David F.
Schiffman, Elizabeth K.
Palm, Jennifer
Strain, Anna K.
Vetter, Sara M.
Nefzger, Brian
Fischer, Marc
Rabe, Ingrid B.
description Most diagnostic testing for West Nile virus (WNV) disease is accomplished using serologic testing, which is subject to cross-reactivity, may require cumbersome confirmatory testing, and may fail to detect infection in specimens collected early in the course of illness. The objective of this project was to determine whether a combination of molecular and serologic testing would increase detection of WNV disease cases in acute serum samples. A total of 380 serum specimens collected ≤7 days after onset of symptoms and submitted to four state public health laboratories for WNV diagnostic testing in 2014 and 2015 were tested. WNV immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody and RT-PCR tests were performed on specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset. WNV IgM antibody testing was performed on specimens collected 4–7 days after onset and RT-PCR was performed on IgM-positive specimens. A patient was considered to have laboratory evidence of WNV infection if they had detectable WNV IgM antibodies or WNV RNA in the submitted serum specimen. Of specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset, 19/158 (12%) had laboratory evidence of WNV infection, including 16 positive for only WNV IgM antibodies, 1 positive for only WNV RNA, and 2 positive for both. Of specimens collected 4–7 days after onset, 21/222 (9%) were positive for WNV IgM antibodies; none had detectable WNV RNA. These findings suggest that routinely performing WNV RT-PCR on acute serum specimens submitted for WNV diagnostic testing is unlikely to identify a substantial number of additional cases beyond IgM antibody testing alone.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/vbz.2018.2412
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7135921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2335145250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-22555d40e17b11b808ea978d53af4cff388516c6e114f261954e5892385b66803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctv1DAQB2ALgegDjlxRJC5csnj89gUJlZYitQWJAkfLSSatq6yz2El5_PV1tKWiXHqyZX8ezfhHyAugK6DGvrlu_qwYBbNiAtgjsgtS6lpraR8ve05rrpTeIXs5X1HKwIB8SnZ4eQpayF1yevhr42OHXXU6DtjOg0_VOeYpxItqjNVnPwWMU65-humy-jLnDbZTwd8Lqc7CgNW3kOZcvQ8ZfcZn5Envh4zPb9d98vXo8PzguD759OHjwbuTuhWWTTVjUspOUATdADSGGvRWm05y34u277kxElSrEED0TIGVAqWxjBvZKGUo3ydvt3U3c7PGri0tJj-4TQprn3670Qd3_yaGS3cxXjsNXFoGpcDr2wJp_DGXYdw65BaHwUcc5-wY5xKEZJI-TBkHq6kyutBX_9GrcU6x_ERRRgtjuVBF1VvVpjHnhP1d30DdkqkrmbolU7dkWvzLf4e9039DLIBvwXLsYxwCNpimB8reAG59rKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287489346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Expanded Molecular Testing on Patients with Suspected West Nile Virus Disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lindsey, Nicole P. ; Messenger, Sharon L. ; Hacker, Jill K. ; Salas, Maria L. ; Scott-Waldron, Christine ; Haydel, Danielle ; Rider, Errin ; Simonson, Sean ; Brown, Catherine M. ; Patel, Pinal ; Smole, Sandra C. ; Neitzel, David F. ; Schiffman, Elizabeth K. ; Palm, Jennifer ; Strain, Anna K. ; Vetter, Sara M. ; Nefzger, Brian ; Fischer, Marc ; Rabe, Ingrid B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, Nicole P. ; Messenger, Sharon L. ; Hacker, Jill K. ; Salas, Maria L. ; Scott-Waldron, Christine ; Haydel, Danielle ; Rider, Errin ; Simonson, Sean ; Brown, Catherine M. ; Patel, Pinal ; Smole, Sandra C. ; Neitzel, David F. ; Schiffman, Elizabeth K. ; Palm, Jennifer ; Strain, Anna K. ; Vetter, Sara M. ; Nefzger, Brian ; Fischer, Marc ; Rabe, Ingrid B.</creatorcontrib><description>Most diagnostic testing for West Nile virus (WNV) disease is accomplished using serologic testing, which is subject to cross-reactivity, may require cumbersome confirmatory testing, and may fail to detect infection in specimens collected early in the course of illness. The objective of this project was to determine whether a combination of molecular and serologic testing would increase detection of WNV disease cases in acute serum samples. A total of 380 serum specimens collected ≤7 days after onset of symptoms and submitted to four state public health laboratories for WNV diagnostic testing in 2014 and 2015 were tested. WNV immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody and RT-PCR tests were performed on specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset. WNV IgM antibody testing was performed on specimens collected 4–7 days after onset and RT-PCR was performed on IgM-positive specimens. A patient was considered to have laboratory evidence of WNV infection if they had detectable WNV IgM antibodies or WNV RNA in the submitted serum specimen. Of specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset, 19/158 (12%) had laboratory evidence of WNV infection, including 16 positive for only WNV IgM antibodies, 1 positive for only WNV RNA, and 2 positive for both. Of specimens collected 4–7 days after onset, 21/222 (9%) were positive for WNV IgM antibodies; none had detectable WNV RNA. These findings suggest that routinely performing WNV RT-PCR on acute serum specimens submitted for WNV diagnostic testing is unlikely to identify a substantial number of additional cases beyond IgM antibody testing alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-3667</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1557-7759</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2018.2412</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31081745</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antibodies ; Antibodies, Viral - blood ; antibody detection ; blood serum ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; cross reaction ; Cross-reactivity ; Diagnostic systems ; Diagnostic tests ; Epidemics ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin M ; Immunoglobulin M - blood ; Immunoglobulins ; Infections ; Laboratories ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original Articles ; patients ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Public health ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Ribonucleic acid ; RNA ; Signs and symptoms ; Vector-borne diseases ; Viruses ; West Nile Fever - diagnosis ; West Nile virus ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2019-09, Vol.19 (9), p.69-693</ispartof><rights>2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</rights><rights>Copyright Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Sep 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-22555d40e17b11b808ea978d53af4cff388516c6e114f261954e5892385b66803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-22555d40e17b11b808ea978d53af4cff388516c6e114f261954e5892385b66803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31081745$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, Nicole P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messenger, Sharon L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hacker, Jill K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salas, Maria L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott-Waldron, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haydel, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rider, Errin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonson, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Pinal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smole, Sandra C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neitzel, David F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiffman, Elizabeth K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palm, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strain, Anna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Sara M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nefzger, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabe, Ingrid B.</creatorcontrib><title>Expanded Molecular Testing on Patients with Suspected West Nile Virus Disease</title><title>Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis</addtitle><description>Most diagnostic testing for West Nile virus (WNV) disease is accomplished using serologic testing, which is subject to cross-reactivity, may require cumbersome confirmatory testing, and may fail to detect infection in specimens collected early in the course of illness. The objective of this project was to determine whether a combination of molecular and serologic testing would increase detection of WNV disease cases in acute serum samples. A total of 380 serum specimens collected ≤7 days after onset of symptoms and submitted to four state public health laboratories for WNV diagnostic testing in 2014 and 2015 were tested. WNV immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody and RT-PCR tests were performed on specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset. WNV IgM antibody testing was performed on specimens collected 4–7 days after onset and RT-PCR was performed on IgM-positive specimens. A patient was considered to have laboratory evidence of WNV infection if they had detectable WNV IgM antibodies or WNV RNA in the submitted serum specimen. Of specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset, 19/158 (12%) had laboratory evidence of WNV infection, including 16 positive for only WNV IgM antibodies, 1 positive for only WNV RNA, and 2 positive for both. Of specimens collected 4–7 days after onset, 21/222 (9%) were positive for WNV IgM antibodies; none had detectable WNV RNA. These findings suggest that routinely performing WNV RT-PCR on acute serum specimens submitted for WNV diagnostic testing is unlikely to identify a substantial number of additional cases beyond IgM antibody testing alone.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood</subject><subject>antibody detection</subject><subject>blood serum</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>cross reaction</subject><subject>Cross-reactivity</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M - blood</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>patients</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Ribonucleic acid</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>Signs and symptoms</subject><subject>Vector-borne diseases</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>West Nile Fever - diagnosis</subject><subject>West Nile virus</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1530-3667</issn><issn>1557-7759</issn><issn>1557-7759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctv1DAQB2ALgegDjlxRJC5csnj89gUJlZYitQWJAkfLSSatq6yz2El5_PV1tKWiXHqyZX8ezfhHyAugK6DGvrlu_qwYBbNiAtgjsgtS6lpraR8ve05rrpTeIXs5X1HKwIB8SnZ4eQpayF1yevhr42OHXXU6DtjOg0_VOeYpxItqjNVnPwWMU65-humy-jLnDbZTwd8Lqc7CgNW3kOZcvQ8ZfcZn5Envh4zPb9d98vXo8PzguD759OHjwbuTuhWWTTVjUspOUATdADSGGvRWm05y34u277kxElSrEED0TIGVAqWxjBvZKGUo3ydvt3U3c7PGri0tJj-4TQprn3670Qd3_yaGS3cxXjsNXFoGpcDr2wJp_DGXYdw65BaHwUcc5-wY5xKEZJI-TBkHq6kyutBX_9GrcU6x_ERRRgtjuVBF1VvVpjHnhP1d30DdkqkrmbolU7dkWvzLf4e9039DLIBvwXLsYxwCNpimB8reAG59rKQ</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Lindsey, Nicole P.</creator><creator>Messenger, Sharon L.</creator><creator>Hacker, Jill K.</creator><creator>Salas, Maria L.</creator><creator>Scott-Waldron, Christine</creator><creator>Haydel, Danielle</creator><creator>Rider, Errin</creator><creator>Simonson, Sean</creator><creator>Brown, Catherine M.</creator><creator>Patel, Pinal</creator><creator>Smole, Sandra C.</creator><creator>Neitzel, David F.</creator><creator>Schiffman, Elizabeth K.</creator><creator>Palm, Jennifer</creator><creator>Strain, Anna K.</creator><creator>Vetter, Sara M.</creator><creator>Nefzger, Brian</creator><creator>Fischer, Marc</creator><creator>Rabe, Ingrid B.</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</general><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Expanded Molecular Testing on Patients with Suspected West Nile Virus Disease</title><author>Lindsey, Nicole P. ; Messenger, Sharon L. ; Hacker, Jill K. ; Salas, Maria L. ; Scott-Waldron, Christine ; Haydel, Danielle ; Rider, Errin ; Simonson, Sean ; Brown, Catherine M. ; Patel, Pinal ; Smole, Sandra C. ; Neitzel, David F. ; Schiffman, Elizabeth K. ; Palm, Jennifer ; Strain, Anna K. ; Vetter, Sara M. ; Nefzger, Brian ; Fischer, Marc ; Rabe, Ingrid B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-22555d40e17b11b808ea978d53af4cff388516c6e114f261954e5892385b66803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - blood</topic><topic>antibody detection</topic><topic>blood serum</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>cross reaction</topic><topic>Cross-reactivity</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M - blood</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>patients</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Ribonucleic acid</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>Signs and symptoms</topic><topic>Vector-borne diseases</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>West Nile Fever - diagnosis</topic><topic>West Nile virus</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, Nicole P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messenger, Sharon L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hacker, Jill K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salas, Maria L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott-Waldron, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haydel, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rider, Errin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonson, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Pinal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smole, Sandra C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neitzel, David F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiffman, Elizabeth K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palm, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strain, Anna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Sara M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nefzger, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabe, Ingrid B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindsey, Nicole P.</au><au>Messenger, Sharon L.</au><au>Hacker, Jill K.</au><au>Salas, Maria L.</au><au>Scott-Waldron, Christine</au><au>Haydel, Danielle</au><au>Rider, Errin</au><au>Simonson, Sean</au><au>Brown, Catherine M.</au><au>Patel, Pinal</au><au>Smole, Sandra C.</au><au>Neitzel, David F.</au><au>Schiffman, Elizabeth K.</au><au>Palm, Jennifer</au><au>Strain, Anna K.</au><au>Vetter, Sara M.</au><au>Nefzger, Brian</au><au>Fischer, Marc</au><au>Rabe, Ingrid B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Expanded Molecular Testing on Patients with Suspected West Nile Virus Disease</atitle><jtitle>Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis</addtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>693</epage><pages>69-693</pages><issn>1530-3667</issn><issn>1557-7759</issn><eissn>1557-7759</eissn><abstract>Most diagnostic testing for West Nile virus (WNV) disease is accomplished using serologic testing, which is subject to cross-reactivity, may require cumbersome confirmatory testing, and may fail to detect infection in specimens collected early in the course of illness. The objective of this project was to determine whether a combination of molecular and serologic testing would increase detection of WNV disease cases in acute serum samples. A total of 380 serum specimens collected ≤7 days after onset of symptoms and submitted to four state public health laboratories for WNV diagnostic testing in 2014 and 2015 were tested. WNV immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody and RT-PCR tests were performed on specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset. WNV IgM antibody testing was performed on specimens collected 4–7 days after onset and RT-PCR was performed on IgM-positive specimens. A patient was considered to have laboratory evidence of WNV infection if they had detectable WNV IgM antibodies or WNV RNA in the submitted serum specimen. Of specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset, 19/158 (12%) had laboratory evidence of WNV infection, including 16 positive for only WNV IgM antibodies, 1 positive for only WNV RNA, and 2 positive for both. Of specimens collected 4–7 days after onset, 21/222 (9%) were positive for WNV IgM antibodies; none had detectable WNV RNA. These findings suggest that routinely performing WNV RT-PCR on acute serum specimens submitted for WNV diagnostic testing is unlikely to identify a substantial number of additional cases beyond IgM antibody testing alone.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</pub><pmid>31081745</pmid><doi>10.1089/vbz.2018.2412</doi><tpages>625</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1530-3667
ispartof Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2019-09, Vol.19 (9), p.69-693
issn 1530-3667
1557-7759
1557-7759
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7135921
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antibodies
Antibodies, Viral - blood
antibody detection
blood serum
Child
Child, Preschool
cross reaction
Cross-reactivity
Diagnostic systems
Diagnostic tests
Epidemics
Female
Humans
Immunoglobulin M
Immunoglobulin M - blood
Immunoglobulins
Infections
Laboratories
Male
Middle Aged
Original Articles
patients
Polymerase chain reaction
Public health
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Ribonucleic acid
RNA
Signs and symptoms
Vector-borne diseases
Viruses
West Nile Fever - diagnosis
West Nile virus
Young Adult
title Expanded Molecular Testing on Patients with Suspected West Nile Virus Disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T11%3A44%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Expanded%20Molecular%20Testing%20on%20Patients%20with%20Suspected%20West%20Nile%20Virus%20Disease&rft.jtitle=Vector%20borne%20and%20zoonotic%20diseases%20(Larchmont,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Lindsey,%20Nicole%20P.&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=693&rft.pages=69-693&rft.issn=1530-3667&rft.eissn=1557-7759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/vbz.2018.2412&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2335145250%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287489346&rft_id=info:pmid/31081745&rfr_iscdi=true