Expanded Molecular Testing on Patients with Suspected West Nile Virus Disease
Most diagnostic testing for West Nile virus (WNV) disease is accomplished using serologic testing, which is subject to cross-reactivity, may require cumbersome confirmatory testing, and may fail to detect infection in specimens collected early in the course of illness. The objective of this project...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-09, Vol.19 (9), p.69-693 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 693 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 69 |
container_title | Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Lindsey, Nicole P. Messenger, Sharon L. Hacker, Jill K. Salas, Maria L. Scott-Waldron, Christine Haydel, Danielle Rider, Errin Simonson, Sean Brown, Catherine M. Patel, Pinal Smole, Sandra C. Neitzel, David F. Schiffman, Elizabeth K. Palm, Jennifer Strain, Anna K. Vetter, Sara M. Nefzger, Brian Fischer, Marc Rabe, Ingrid B. |
description | Most diagnostic testing for West Nile virus (WNV) disease is accomplished using serologic testing, which is subject to cross-reactivity, may require cumbersome confirmatory testing, and may fail to detect infection in specimens collected early in the course of illness. The objective of this project was to determine whether a combination of molecular and serologic testing would increase detection of WNV disease cases in acute serum samples. A total of 380 serum specimens collected ≤7 days after onset of symptoms and submitted to four state public health laboratories for WNV diagnostic testing in 2014 and 2015 were tested. WNV immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody and RT-PCR tests were performed on specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset. WNV IgM antibody testing was performed on specimens collected 4–7 days after onset and RT-PCR was performed on IgM-positive specimens. A patient was considered to have laboratory evidence of WNV infection if they had detectable WNV IgM antibodies or WNV RNA in the submitted serum specimen. Of specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset, 19/158 (12%) had laboratory evidence of WNV infection, including 16 positive for only WNV IgM antibodies, 1 positive for only WNV RNA, and 2 positive for both. Of specimens collected 4–7 days after onset, 21/222 (9%) were positive for WNV IgM antibodies; none had detectable WNV RNA. These findings suggest that routinely performing WNV RT-PCR on acute serum specimens submitted for WNV diagnostic testing is unlikely to identify a substantial number of additional cases beyond IgM antibody testing alone. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1089/vbz.2018.2412 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7135921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2335145250</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-22555d40e17b11b808ea978d53af4cff388516c6e114f261954e5892385b66803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctv1DAQB2ALgegDjlxRJC5csnj89gUJlZYitQWJAkfLSSatq6yz2El5_PV1tKWiXHqyZX8ezfhHyAugK6DGvrlu_qwYBbNiAtgjsgtS6lpraR8ve05rrpTeIXs5X1HKwIB8SnZ4eQpayF1yevhr42OHXXU6DtjOg0_VOeYpxItqjNVnPwWMU65-humy-jLnDbZTwd8Lqc7CgNW3kOZcvQ8ZfcZn5Envh4zPb9d98vXo8PzguD759OHjwbuTuhWWTTVjUspOUATdADSGGvRWm05y34u277kxElSrEED0TIGVAqWxjBvZKGUo3ydvt3U3c7PGri0tJj-4TQprn3670Qd3_yaGS3cxXjsNXFoGpcDr2wJp_DGXYdw65BaHwUcc5-wY5xKEZJI-TBkHq6kyutBX_9GrcU6x_ERRRgtjuVBF1VvVpjHnhP1d30DdkqkrmbolU7dkWvzLf4e9039DLIBvwXLsYxwCNpimB8reAG59rKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287489346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Expanded Molecular Testing on Patients with Suspected West Nile Virus Disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lindsey, Nicole P. ; Messenger, Sharon L. ; Hacker, Jill K. ; Salas, Maria L. ; Scott-Waldron, Christine ; Haydel, Danielle ; Rider, Errin ; Simonson, Sean ; Brown, Catherine M. ; Patel, Pinal ; Smole, Sandra C. ; Neitzel, David F. ; Schiffman, Elizabeth K. ; Palm, Jennifer ; Strain, Anna K. ; Vetter, Sara M. ; Nefzger, Brian ; Fischer, Marc ; Rabe, Ingrid B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, Nicole P. ; Messenger, Sharon L. ; Hacker, Jill K. ; Salas, Maria L. ; Scott-Waldron, Christine ; Haydel, Danielle ; Rider, Errin ; Simonson, Sean ; Brown, Catherine M. ; Patel, Pinal ; Smole, Sandra C. ; Neitzel, David F. ; Schiffman, Elizabeth K. ; Palm, Jennifer ; Strain, Anna K. ; Vetter, Sara M. ; Nefzger, Brian ; Fischer, Marc ; Rabe, Ingrid B.</creatorcontrib><description>Most diagnostic testing for West Nile virus (WNV) disease is accomplished using serologic testing, which is subject to cross-reactivity, may require cumbersome confirmatory testing, and may fail to detect infection in specimens collected early in the course of illness. The objective of this project was to determine whether a combination of molecular and serologic testing would increase detection of WNV disease cases in acute serum samples. A total of 380 serum specimens collected ≤7 days after onset of symptoms and submitted to four state public health laboratories for WNV diagnostic testing in 2014 and 2015 were tested. WNV immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody and RT-PCR tests were performed on specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset. WNV IgM antibody testing was performed on specimens collected 4–7 days after onset and RT-PCR was performed on IgM-positive specimens. A patient was considered to have laboratory evidence of WNV infection if they had detectable WNV IgM antibodies or WNV RNA in the submitted serum specimen. Of specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset, 19/158 (12%) had laboratory evidence of WNV infection, including 16 positive for only WNV IgM antibodies, 1 positive for only WNV RNA, and 2 positive for both. Of specimens collected 4–7 days after onset, 21/222 (9%) were positive for WNV IgM antibodies; none had detectable WNV RNA. These findings suggest that routinely performing WNV RT-PCR on acute serum specimens submitted for WNV diagnostic testing is unlikely to identify a substantial number of additional cases beyond IgM antibody testing alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-3667</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1557-7759</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2018.2412</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31081745</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antibodies ; Antibodies, Viral - blood ; antibody detection ; blood serum ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; cross reaction ; Cross-reactivity ; Diagnostic systems ; Diagnostic tests ; Epidemics ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin M ; Immunoglobulin M - blood ; Immunoglobulins ; Infections ; Laboratories ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original Articles ; patients ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Public health ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Ribonucleic acid ; RNA ; Signs and symptoms ; Vector-borne diseases ; Viruses ; West Nile Fever - diagnosis ; West Nile virus ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2019-09, Vol.19 (9), p.69-693</ispartof><rights>2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</rights><rights>Copyright Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Sep 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-22555d40e17b11b808ea978d53af4cff388516c6e114f261954e5892385b66803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-22555d40e17b11b808ea978d53af4cff388516c6e114f261954e5892385b66803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31081745$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, Nicole P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messenger, Sharon L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hacker, Jill K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salas, Maria L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott-Waldron, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haydel, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rider, Errin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonson, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Pinal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smole, Sandra C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neitzel, David F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiffman, Elizabeth K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palm, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strain, Anna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Sara M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nefzger, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabe, Ingrid B.</creatorcontrib><title>Expanded Molecular Testing on Patients with Suspected West Nile Virus Disease</title><title>Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis</addtitle><description>Most diagnostic testing for West Nile virus (WNV) disease is accomplished using serologic testing, which is subject to cross-reactivity, may require cumbersome confirmatory testing, and may fail to detect infection in specimens collected early in the course of illness. The objective of this project was to determine whether a combination of molecular and serologic testing would increase detection of WNV disease cases in acute serum samples. A total of 380 serum specimens collected ≤7 days after onset of symptoms and submitted to four state public health laboratories for WNV diagnostic testing in 2014 and 2015 were tested. WNV immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody and RT-PCR tests were performed on specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset. WNV IgM antibody testing was performed on specimens collected 4–7 days after onset and RT-PCR was performed on IgM-positive specimens. A patient was considered to have laboratory evidence of WNV infection if they had detectable WNV IgM antibodies or WNV RNA in the submitted serum specimen. Of specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset, 19/158 (12%) had laboratory evidence of WNV infection, including 16 positive for only WNV IgM antibodies, 1 positive for only WNV RNA, and 2 positive for both. Of specimens collected 4–7 days after onset, 21/222 (9%) were positive for WNV IgM antibodies; none had detectable WNV RNA. These findings suggest that routinely performing WNV RT-PCR on acute serum specimens submitted for WNV diagnostic testing is unlikely to identify a substantial number of additional cases beyond IgM antibody testing alone.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood</subject><subject>antibody detection</subject><subject>blood serum</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>cross reaction</subject><subject>Cross-reactivity</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin M - blood</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>patients</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Ribonucleic acid</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>Signs and symptoms</subject><subject>Vector-borne diseases</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>West Nile Fever - diagnosis</subject><subject>West Nile virus</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1530-3667</issn><issn>1557-7759</issn><issn>1557-7759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctv1DAQB2ALgegDjlxRJC5csnj89gUJlZYitQWJAkfLSSatq6yz2El5_PV1tKWiXHqyZX8ezfhHyAugK6DGvrlu_qwYBbNiAtgjsgtS6lpraR8ve05rrpTeIXs5X1HKwIB8SnZ4eQpayF1yevhr42OHXXU6DtjOg0_VOeYpxItqjNVnPwWMU65-humy-jLnDbZTwd8Lqc7CgNW3kOZcvQ8ZfcZn5Envh4zPb9d98vXo8PzguD759OHjwbuTuhWWTTVjUspOUATdADSGGvRWm05y34u277kxElSrEED0TIGVAqWxjBvZKGUo3ydvt3U3c7PGri0tJj-4TQprn3670Qd3_yaGS3cxXjsNXFoGpcDr2wJp_DGXYdw65BaHwUcc5-wY5xKEZJI-TBkHq6kyutBX_9GrcU6x_ERRRgtjuVBF1VvVpjHnhP1d30DdkqkrmbolU7dkWvzLf4e9039DLIBvwXLsYxwCNpimB8reAG59rKQ</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Lindsey, Nicole P.</creator><creator>Messenger, Sharon L.</creator><creator>Hacker, Jill K.</creator><creator>Salas, Maria L.</creator><creator>Scott-Waldron, Christine</creator><creator>Haydel, Danielle</creator><creator>Rider, Errin</creator><creator>Simonson, Sean</creator><creator>Brown, Catherine M.</creator><creator>Patel, Pinal</creator><creator>Smole, Sandra C.</creator><creator>Neitzel, David F.</creator><creator>Schiffman, Elizabeth K.</creator><creator>Palm, Jennifer</creator><creator>Strain, Anna K.</creator><creator>Vetter, Sara M.</creator><creator>Nefzger, Brian</creator><creator>Fischer, Marc</creator><creator>Rabe, Ingrid B.</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</general><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Expanded Molecular Testing on Patients with Suspected West Nile Virus Disease</title><author>Lindsey, Nicole P. ; Messenger, Sharon L. ; Hacker, Jill K. ; Salas, Maria L. ; Scott-Waldron, Christine ; Haydel, Danielle ; Rider, Errin ; Simonson, Sean ; Brown, Catherine M. ; Patel, Pinal ; Smole, Sandra C. ; Neitzel, David F. ; Schiffman, Elizabeth K. ; Palm, Jennifer ; Strain, Anna K. ; Vetter, Sara M. ; Nefzger, Brian ; Fischer, Marc ; Rabe, Ingrid B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-22555d40e17b11b808ea978d53af4cff388516c6e114f261954e5892385b66803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - blood</topic><topic>antibody detection</topic><topic>blood serum</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>cross reaction</topic><topic>Cross-reactivity</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin M - blood</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>patients</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Ribonucleic acid</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>Signs and symptoms</topic><topic>Vector-borne diseases</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>West Nile Fever - diagnosis</topic><topic>West Nile virus</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindsey, Nicole P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messenger, Sharon L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hacker, Jill K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salas, Maria L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott-Waldron, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haydel, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rider, Errin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonson, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Catherine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Pinal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smole, Sandra C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neitzel, David F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiffman, Elizabeth K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palm, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strain, Anna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Sara M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nefzger, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabe, Ingrid B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindsey, Nicole P.</au><au>Messenger, Sharon L.</au><au>Hacker, Jill K.</au><au>Salas, Maria L.</au><au>Scott-Waldron, Christine</au><au>Haydel, Danielle</au><au>Rider, Errin</au><au>Simonson, Sean</au><au>Brown, Catherine M.</au><au>Patel, Pinal</au><au>Smole, Sandra C.</au><au>Neitzel, David F.</au><au>Schiffman, Elizabeth K.</au><au>Palm, Jennifer</au><au>Strain, Anna K.</au><au>Vetter, Sara M.</au><au>Nefzger, Brian</au><au>Fischer, Marc</au><au>Rabe, Ingrid B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Expanded Molecular Testing on Patients with Suspected West Nile Virus Disease</atitle><jtitle>Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis</addtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>693</epage><pages>69-693</pages><issn>1530-3667</issn><issn>1557-7759</issn><eissn>1557-7759</eissn><abstract>Most diagnostic testing for West Nile virus (WNV) disease is accomplished using serologic testing, which is subject to cross-reactivity, may require cumbersome confirmatory testing, and may fail to detect infection in specimens collected early in the course of illness. The objective of this project was to determine whether a combination of molecular and serologic testing would increase detection of WNV disease cases in acute serum samples. A total of 380 serum specimens collected ≤7 days after onset of symptoms and submitted to four state public health laboratories for WNV diagnostic testing in 2014 and 2015 were tested. WNV immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody and RT-PCR tests were performed on specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset. WNV IgM antibody testing was performed on specimens collected 4–7 days after onset and RT-PCR was performed on IgM-positive specimens. A patient was considered to have laboratory evidence of WNV infection if they had detectable WNV IgM antibodies or WNV RNA in the submitted serum specimen. Of specimens collected ≤3 days after symptom onset, 19/158 (12%) had laboratory evidence of WNV infection, including 16 positive for only WNV IgM antibodies, 1 positive for only WNV RNA, and 2 positive for both. Of specimens collected 4–7 days after onset, 21/222 (9%) were positive for WNV IgM antibodies; none had detectable WNV RNA. These findings suggest that routinely performing WNV RT-PCR on acute serum specimens submitted for WNV diagnostic testing is unlikely to identify a substantial number of additional cases beyond IgM antibody testing alone.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</pub><pmid>31081745</pmid><doi>10.1089/vbz.2018.2412</doi><tpages>625</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1530-3667 |
ispartof | Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2019-09, Vol.19 (9), p.69-693 |
issn | 1530-3667 1557-7759 1557-7759 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7135921 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Antibodies Antibodies, Viral - blood antibody detection blood serum Child Child, Preschool cross reaction Cross-reactivity Diagnostic systems Diagnostic tests Epidemics Female Humans Immunoglobulin M Immunoglobulin M - blood Immunoglobulins Infections Laboratories Male Middle Aged Original Articles patients Polymerase chain reaction Public health Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction Ribonucleic acid RNA Signs and symptoms Vector-borne diseases Viruses West Nile Fever - diagnosis West Nile virus Young Adult |
title | Expanded Molecular Testing on Patients with Suspected West Nile Virus Disease |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T11%3A44%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Expanded%20Molecular%20Testing%20on%20Patients%20with%20Suspected%20West%20Nile%20Virus%20Disease&rft.jtitle=Vector%20borne%20and%20zoonotic%20diseases%20(Larchmont,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Lindsey,%20Nicole%20P.&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=693&rft.pages=69-693&rft.issn=1530-3667&rft.eissn=1557-7759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/vbz.2018.2412&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2335145250%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287489346&rft_id=info:pmid/31081745&rfr_iscdi=true |