DNA Damage Kills Bacterial Spores and Cells Exposed to 222-Nanometer UV Radiation

This study examined the microbicidal activity of 222-nm UV radiation (UV ), which is potentially a safer alternative to the 254-nm UV radiation (UV ) that is often used for surface decontamination. Spores and/or growing and stationary-phase cells of , , , , and and a herpesvirus were all killed or i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied and environmental microbiology 2020-04, Vol.86 (8), p.1
Hauptverfasser: Taylor, Willie, Camilleri, Emily, Craft, D Levi, Korza, George, Granados, Maria Rocha, Peterson, Jaliyah, Szczpaniak, Renata, Weller, Sandra K, Moeller, Ralf, Douki, Thierry, Mok, Wendy W K, Setlow, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1
container_title Applied and environmental microbiology
container_volume 86
creator Taylor, Willie
Camilleri, Emily
Craft, D Levi
Korza, George
Granados, Maria Rocha
Peterson, Jaliyah
Szczpaniak, Renata
Weller, Sandra K
Moeller, Ralf
Douki, Thierry
Mok, Wendy W K
Setlow, Peter
description This study examined the microbicidal activity of 222-nm UV radiation (UV ), which is potentially a safer alternative to the 254-nm UV radiation (UV ) that is often used for surface decontamination. Spores and/or growing and stationary-phase cells of , , , , and and a herpesvirus were all killed or inactivated by UV and at lower fluences than with UV spores and cells lacking the major DNA repair protein RecA were more sensitive to UV , as were spores lacking their DNA-protective proteins, the α/β-type small, acid-soluble spore proteins. The spore cores' large amount of Ca -dipicolinic acid (∼25% of the core dry weight) also protected and spores against UV , while spores' proteinaceous coat may have given some slight protection against UV Survivors among spores treated with UV acquired a large number of mutations, and this radiation generated known mutagenic photoproducts in spore and cell DNA, primarily cyclobutane-type pyrimidine dimers in growing cells and an α-thyminyl-thymine adduct termed the spore photoproduct (SP) in spores. Notably, the loss of a key SP repair protein markedly decreased spore UV resistance. UV -treated spores germinated relatively normally, and the generation of colonies from these germinated spores was not salt sensitive. The latter two findings suggest that UV does not kill spores by general protein damage, and thus, the new results are consistent with the notion that DNA damage is responsible for the killing of spores and cells by UV Spores of a variety of bacteria are resistant to common decontamination agents, and many of them are major causes of food spoilage and some serious human diseases, including anthrax caused by spores of Consequently, there is an ongoing need for efficient methods for spore eradication, in particular methods that have minimal deleterious effects on people or the environment. UV radiation at 254 nm (UV ) is sporicidal and commonly used for surface decontamination but can cause deleterious effects in humans. Recent work, however, suggests that 222-nm UV (UV ) may be less harmful to people than UV yet may still kill bacteria and at lower fluences than UV The present work has identified the damage by UV that leads to the killing of growing cells and spores of some bacteria, many of which are human pathogens, and UV also inactivates a herpesvirus.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/aem.03039-19
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7117916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2388009314</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-2fe99cea8ec8562a6baf7dcb4a9380bb984f8403d027b4f494564fd7cd98f9a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctP20AQxlcVqITHrWe0EqdKGGYftncvSCEJDxFA0NLramyvEyPbm-46Efz3OISitqeRZn7zjb75CPnG4IQxrk7RNicgQOiI6S9kwECrKBYi2SIDAK0jziXskN0QngFAQqK-kh3BQQgt1YA8jO-GdIwNziy9qeo60HPMO-srrOmPhfM2UGwLOrLr0eRl4YItaOco5zy6w9Y1tofp0y_6iEWFXeXafbJdYh3swUfdI08Xk5-jq2h6f3k9Gk6jPGa8i3hptc4tKpurOOGYZFimRZ5J1EJBlmklSyVBFMDTTJZSyziRZZHmhValxlTskbON7mKZNbbIbdt5rM3CVw36V-OwMv9O2mpuZm5lUsZSzZJe4PtGYP7f2tVwatY94HESx0m6Yj179HHMu99LGzrz7Ja-7f0ZLpTqHy2Y7KnjDZV7F4K35acsA7MOywwnt-Y9LMN0jx_-7eAT_pOOeAMh_Y38</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2388009314</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DNA Damage Kills Bacterial Spores and Cells Exposed to 222-Nanometer UV Radiation</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Taylor, Willie ; Camilleri, Emily ; Craft, D Levi ; Korza, George ; Granados, Maria Rocha ; Peterson, Jaliyah ; Szczpaniak, Renata ; Weller, Sandra K ; Moeller, Ralf ; Douki, Thierry ; Mok, Wendy W K ; Setlow, Peter</creator><contributor>Schaffner, Donald W.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Willie ; Camilleri, Emily ; Craft, D Levi ; Korza, George ; Granados, Maria Rocha ; Peterson, Jaliyah ; Szczpaniak, Renata ; Weller, Sandra K ; Moeller, Ralf ; Douki, Thierry ; Mok, Wendy W K ; Setlow, Peter ; Schaffner, Donald W.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the microbicidal activity of 222-nm UV radiation (UV ), which is potentially a safer alternative to the 254-nm UV radiation (UV ) that is often used for surface decontamination. Spores and/or growing and stationary-phase cells of , , , , and and a herpesvirus were all killed or inactivated by UV and at lower fluences than with UV spores and cells lacking the major DNA repair protein RecA were more sensitive to UV , as were spores lacking their DNA-protective proteins, the α/β-type small, acid-soluble spore proteins. The spore cores' large amount of Ca -dipicolinic acid (∼25% of the core dry weight) also protected and spores against UV , while spores' proteinaceous coat may have given some slight protection against UV Survivors among spores treated with UV acquired a large number of mutations, and this radiation generated known mutagenic photoproducts in spore and cell DNA, primarily cyclobutane-type pyrimidine dimers in growing cells and an α-thyminyl-thymine adduct termed the spore photoproduct (SP) in spores. Notably, the loss of a key SP repair protein markedly decreased spore UV resistance. UV -treated spores germinated relatively normally, and the generation of colonies from these germinated spores was not salt sensitive. The latter two findings suggest that UV does not kill spores by general protein damage, and thus, the new results are consistent with the notion that DNA damage is responsible for the killing of spores and cells by UV Spores of a variety of bacteria are resistant to common decontamination agents, and many of them are major causes of food spoilage and some serious human diseases, including anthrax caused by spores of Consequently, there is an ongoing need for efficient methods for spore eradication, in particular methods that have minimal deleterious effects on people or the environment. UV radiation at 254 nm (UV ) is sporicidal and commonly used for surface decontamination but can cause deleterious effects in humans. Recent work, however, suggests that 222-nm UV (UV ) may be less harmful to people than UV yet may still kill bacteria and at lower fluences than UV The present work has identified the damage by UV that leads to the killing of growing cells and spores of some bacteria, many of which are human pathogens, and UV also inactivates a herpesvirus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2240</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-5336</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/aem.03039-19</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32033948</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Anthrax ; Bacteria ; Biochemistry ; Biochemistry, Molecular Biology ; Calcium ; Calcium ions ; Cyclobutane ; Damage detection ; Decontamination ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Dimers ; DNA ; DNA damage ; DNA repair ; Environmental effects ; Food spoilage ; Life Sciences ; Microbicides ; Mutation ; Physiology ; Proteins ; Radiation damage ; RecA protein ; Repair ; Spoilage ; Spores ; Thymine ; Ultraviolet radiation</subject><ispartof>Applied and environmental microbiology, 2020-04, Vol.86 (8), p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Microbiology Apr 2020</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology. 2020 American Society for Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-2fe99cea8ec8562a6baf7dcb4a9380bb984f8403d027b4f494564fd7cd98f9a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-2fe99cea8ec8562a6baf7dcb4a9380bb984f8403d027b4f494564fd7cd98f9a73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4519-6276 ; 0000-0003-3119-2669 ; 0000-0002-5022-071X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117916/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7117916/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3188,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32033948$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02565567$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Schaffner, Donald W.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Willie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camilleri, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craft, D Levi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korza, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granados, Maria Rocha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Jaliyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szczpaniak, Renata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, Sandra K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeller, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douki, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mok, Wendy W K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setlow, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>DNA Damage Kills Bacterial Spores and Cells Exposed to 222-Nanometer UV Radiation</title><title>Applied and environmental microbiology</title><addtitle>Appl Environ Microbiol</addtitle><description>This study examined the microbicidal activity of 222-nm UV radiation (UV ), which is potentially a safer alternative to the 254-nm UV radiation (UV ) that is often used for surface decontamination. Spores and/or growing and stationary-phase cells of , , , , and and a herpesvirus were all killed or inactivated by UV and at lower fluences than with UV spores and cells lacking the major DNA repair protein RecA were more sensitive to UV , as were spores lacking their DNA-protective proteins, the α/β-type small, acid-soluble spore proteins. The spore cores' large amount of Ca -dipicolinic acid (∼25% of the core dry weight) also protected and spores against UV , while spores' proteinaceous coat may have given some slight protection against UV Survivors among spores treated with UV acquired a large number of mutations, and this radiation generated known mutagenic photoproducts in spore and cell DNA, primarily cyclobutane-type pyrimidine dimers in growing cells and an α-thyminyl-thymine adduct termed the spore photoproduct (SP) in spores. Notably, the loss of a key SP repair protein markedly decreased spore UV resistance. UV -treated spores germinated relatively normally, and the generation of colonies from these germinated spores was not salt sensitive. The latter two findings suggest that UV does not kill spores by general protein damage, and thus, the new results are consistent with the notion that DNA damage is responsible for the killing of spores and cells by UV Spores of a variety of bacteria are resistant to common decontamination agents, and many of them are major causes of food spoilage and some serious human diseases, including anthrax caused by spores of Consequently, there is an ongoing need for efficient methods for spore eradication, in particular methods that have minimal deleterious effects on people or the environment. UV radiation at 254 nm (UV ) is sporicidal and commonly used for surface decontamination but can cause deleterious effects in humans. Recent work, however, suggests that 222-nm UV (UV ) may be less harmful to people than UV yet may still kill bacteria and at lower fluences than UV The present work has identified the damage by UV that leads to the killing of growing cells and spores of some bacteria, many of which are human pathogens, and UV also inactivates a herpesvirus.</description><subject>Anthrax</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biochemistry, Molecular Biology</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Calcium ions</subject><subject>Cyclobutane</subject><subject>Damage detection</subject><subject>Decontamination</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Dimers</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA damage</subject><subject>DNA repair</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>Food spoilage</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microbicides</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Radiation damage</subject><subject>RecA protein</subject><subject>Repair</subject><subject>Spoilage</subject><subject>Spores</subject><subject>Thymine</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><issn>0099-2240</issn><issn>1098-5336</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkctP20AQxlcVqITHrWe0EqdKGGYftncvSCEJDxFA0NLramyvEyPbm-46Efz3OISitqeRZn7zjb75CPnG4IQxrk7RNicgQOiI6S9kwECrKBYi2SIDAK0jziXskN0QngFAQqK-kh3BQQgt1YA8jO-GdIwNziy9qeo60HPMO-srrOmPhfM2UGwLOrLr0eRl4YItaOco5zy6w9Y1tofp0y_6iEWFXeXafbJdYh3swUfdI08Xk5-jq2h6f3k9Gk6jPGa8i3hptc4tKpurOOGYZFimRZ5J1EJBlmklSyVBFMDTTJZSyziRZZHmhValxlTskbON7mKZNbbIbdt5rM3CVw36V-OwMv9O2mpuZm5lUsZSzZJe4PtGYP7f2tVwatY94HESx0m6Yj179HHMu99LGzrz7Ja-7f0ZLpTqHy2Y7KnjDZV7F4K35acsA7MOywwnt-Y9LMN0jx_-7eAT_pOOeAMh_Y38</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Taylor, Willie</creator><creator>Camilleri, Emily</creator><creator>Craft, D Levi</creator><creator>Korza, George</creator><creator>Granados, Maria Rocha</creator><creator>Peterson, Jaliyah</creator><creator>Szczpaniak, Renata</creator><creator>Weller, Sandra K</creator><creator>Moeller, Ralf</creator><creator>Douki, Thierry</creator><creator>Mok, Wendy W K</creator><creator>Setlow, Peter</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4519-6276</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3119-2669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5022-071X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>DNA Damage Kills Bacterial Spores and Cells Exposed to 222-Nanometer UV Radiation</title><author>Taylor, Willie ; Camilleri, Emily ; Craft, D Levi ; Korza, George ; Granados, Maria Rocha ; Peterson, Jaliyah ; Szczpaniak, Renata ; Weller, Sandra K ; Moeller, Ralf ; Douki, Thierry ; Mok, Wendy W K ; Setlow, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-2fe99cea8ec8562a6baf7dcb4a9380bb984f8403d027b4f494564fd7cd98f9a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anthrax</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biochemistry, Molecular Biology</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Calcium ions</topic><topic>Cyclobutane</topic><topic>Damage detection</topic><topic>Decontamination</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Dimers</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA damage</topic><topic>DNA repair</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>Food spoilage</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microbicides</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Radiation damage</topic><topic>RecA protein</topic><topic>Repair</topic><topic>Spoilage</topic><topic>Spores</topic><topic>Thymine</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Willie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camilleri, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craft, D Levi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korza, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granados, Maria Rocha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Jaliyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szczpaniak, Renata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weller, Sandra K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeller, Ralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douki, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mok, Wendy W K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setlow, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Applied and environmental microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taylor, Willie</au><au>Camilleri, Emily</au><au>Craft, D Levi</au><au>Korza, George</au><au>Granados, Maria Rocha</au><au>Peterson, Jaliyah</au><au>Szczpaniak, Renata</au><au>Weller, Sandra K</au><au>Moeller, Ralf</au><au>Douki, Thierry</au><au>Mok, Wendy W K</au><au>Setlow, Peter</au><au>Schaffner, Donald W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DNA Damage Kills Bacterial Spores and Cells Exposed to 222-Nanometer UV Radiation</atitle><jtitle>Applied and environmental microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Environ Microbiol</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0099-2240</issn><eissn>1098-5336</eissn><abstract>This study examined the microbicidal activity of 222-nm UV radiation (UV ), which is potentially a safer alternative to the 254-nm UV radiation (UV ) that is often used for surface decontamination. Spores and/or growing and stationary-phase cells of , , , , and and a herpesvirus were all killed or inactivated by UV and at lower fluences than with UV spores and cells lacking the major DNA repair protein RecA were more sensitive to UV , as were spores lacking their DNA-protective proteins, the α/β-type small, acid-soluble spore proteins. The spore cores' large amount of Ca -dipicolinic acid (∼25% of the core dry weight) also protected and spores against UV , while spores' proteinaceous coat may have given some slight protection against UV Survivors among spores treated with UV acquired a large number of mutations, and this radiation generated known mutagenic photoproducts in spore and cell DNA, primarily cyclobutane-type pyrimidine dimers in growing cells and an α-thyminyl-thymine adduct termed the spore photoproduct (SP) in spores. Notably, the loss of a key SP repair protein markedly decreased spore UV resistance. UV -treated spores germinated relatively normally, and the generation of colonies from these germinated spores was not salt sensitive. The latter two findings suggest that UV does not kill spores by general protein damage, and thus, the new results are consistent with the notion that DNA damage is responsible for the killing of spores and cells by UV Spores of a variety of bacteria are resistant to common decontamination agents, and many of them are major causes of food spoilage and some serious human diseases, including anthrax caused by spores of Consequently, there is an ongoing need for efficient methods for spore eradication, in particular methods that have minimal deleterious effects on people or the environment. UV radiation at 254 nm (UV ) is sporicidal and commonly used for surface decontamination but can cause deleterious effects in humans. Recent work, however, suggests that 222-nm UV (UV ) may be less harmful to people than UV yet may still kill bacteria and at lower fluences than UV The present work has identified the damage by UV that leads to the killing of growing cells and spores of some bacteria, many of which are human pathogens, and UV also inactivates a herpesvirus.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>32033948</pmid><doi>10.1128/aem.03039-19</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4519-6276</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3119-2669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5022-071X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0099-2240
ispartof Applied and environmental microbiology, 2020-04, Vol.86 (8), p.1
issn 0099-2240
1098-5336
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7117916
source American Society for Microbiology; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Anthrax
Bacteria
Biochemistry
Biochemistry, Molecular Biology
Calcium
Calcium ions
Cyclobutane
Damage detection
Decontamination
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Dimers
DNA
DNA damage
DNA repair
Environmental effects
Food spoilage
Life Sciences
Microbicides
Mutation
Physiology
Proteins
Radiation damage
RecA protein
Repair
Spoilage
Spores
Thymine
Ultraviolet radiation
title DNA Damage Kills Bacterial Spores and Cells Exposed to 222-Nanometer UV Radiation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A06%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DNA%20Damage%20Kills%20Bacterial%20Spores%20and%20Cells%20Exposed%20to%20222-Nanometer%20UV%20Radiation&rft.jtitle=Applied%20and%20environmental%20microbiology&rft.au=Taylor,%20Willie&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0099-2240&rft.eissn=1098-5336&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/aem.03039-19&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2388009314%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2388009314&rft_id=info:pmid/32033948&rfr_iscdi=true