Stuck in a negative me: fMRI study on the role of disturbed self-views in social feedback processing in borderline personality disorder

Interpersonal difficulties in borderline personality disorder (BPD) could be related to the disturbed self-views of BPD patients. This study investigates affective and neural responses to positive and negative social feedback (SF) of BPD patients compared with healthy (HC) and low self-esteem (LSE)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological medicine 2020-03, Vol.50 (4), p.625-635
Hauptverfasser: van Schie, Charlotte C, Chiu, Chui-De, Rombouts, Serge A R B, Heiser, Willem J, Elzinga, Bernet M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 635
container_issue 4
container_start_page 625
container_title Psychological medicine
container_volume 50
creator van Schie, Charlotte C
Chiu, Chui-De
Rombouts, Serge A R B
Heiser, Willem J
Elzinga, Bernet M
description Interpersonal difficulties in borderline personality disorder (BPD) could be related to the disturbed self-views of BPD patients. This study investigates affective and neural responses to positive and negative social feedback (SF) of BPD patients compared with healthy (HC) and low self-esteem (LSE) controls and how this relates to individual self-views. BPD (N = 26), HC (N = 32), and LSE (N = 22) performed a SF task in a magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Participants received 15 negative, intermediate and positive evaluative feedback words putatively given by another participant and rated their mood and applicability of the words to the self. BPD had more negative self-views than HC and felt worse after negative feedback. Applicability of feedback was a less strong determinant of mood in BPD than HC. Increased precuneus activation was observed in HC to negative compared with positive feedback, whereas in BPD, this was similarly low for both valences. HC showed increased temporoparietal junction (TPJ) activation to positive v. negative feedback, while BPD showed more TPJ activation to negative feedback. The LSE group showed a different pattern of results suggesting that LSE cannot explain these findings in BPD. The negative self-views that BPD have, may obstruct critically examining negative feedback, resulting in lower mood. Moreover, where HC focus on the positive feedback (based on TPJ activation), BPD seem to focus more on negative feedback, potentially maintaining negative self-views. Better balanced self-views may make BPD better equipped to deal with potential negative feedback and more open to positive interactions.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0033291719000448
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7093320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2191360332</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-1566361820600830cee793cff5fbbdd103f8920fd3841f475a0873b712eff55e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkV9rFDEUxYModq1-AF8k4IsvozeT2UnGB0GK1UJFsPocMsnNNjWbrMnMyn6Cfm0zthb_PF3IOffHPTmEPGXwkgETry4AOG8HJtgAAF0n75EV6_qhkYOQ98lqkZtFPyKPSrkCYJx17UNyxEH2AgRfkeuLaTbfqI9U04gbPfk90i2-pu7j5zNaptkeaIp0ukSaU0CaHLW-PucRLS0YXLP3-KMsgJKM14E6RDvqytzlZLAUHzeLOqZsMQcfke4wlxR18NNhgf0SHpMHToeCT27nMfl6-u7LyYfm_NP7s5O3543pWjE1bN33vGeyhR5AcjCIYuDGubUbR2sZcCeHFpzlsmOuE2sNUvBRsBarZ438mLy54e7mcYvWYJyyDmqX_Vbng0raq7-V6C_VJu2VgKH-NVTAi1tATt9nLJPa-mIwBB0xzUW1bGC8X3qp1uf_WK_SnGvw6uI1QtfWJNXFblwmp1IyurtjGKilZvVfzXXn2Z8p7jZ-98p_AoC-o_0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2382042618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stuck in a negative me: fMRI study on the role of disturbed self-views in social feedback processing in borderline personality disorder</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals</source><creator>van Schie, Charlotte C ; Chiu, Chui-De ; Rombouts, Serge A R B ; Heiser, Willem J ; Elzinga, Bernet M</creator><creatorcontrib>van Schie, Charlotte C ; Chiu, Chui-De ; Rombouts, Serge A R B ; Heiser, Willem J ; Elzinga, Bernet M</creatorcontrib><description>Interpersonal difficulties in borderline personality disorder (BPD) could be related to the disturbed self-views of BPD patients. This study investigates affective and neural responses to positive and negative social feedback (SF) of BPD patients compared with healthy (HC) and low self-esteem (LSE) controls and how this relates to individual self-views. BPD (N = 26), HC (N = 32), and LSE (N = 22) performed a SF task in a magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Participants received 15 negative, intermediate and positive evaluative feedback words putatively given by another participant and rated their mood and applicability of the words to the self. BPD had more negative self-views than HC and felt worse after negative feedback. Applicability of feedback was a less strong determinant of mood in BPD than HC. Increased precuneus activation was observed in HC to negative compared with positive feedback, whereas in BPD, this was similarly low for both valences. HC showed increased temporoparietal junction (TPJ) activation to positive v. negative feedback, while BPD showed more TPJ activation to negative feedback. The LSE group showed a different pattern of results suggesting that LSE cannot explain these findings in BPD. The negative self-views that BPD have, may obstruct critically examining negative feedback, resulting in lower mood. Moreover, where HC focus on the positive feedback (based on TPJ activation), BPD seem to focus more on negative feedback, potentially maintaining negative self-views. Better balanced self-views may make BPD better equipped to deal with potential negative feedback and more open to positive interactions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0033291719000448</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30867073</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Attribution ; Borderline personality disorder ; Borderline Personality Disorder - diagnostic imaging ; Borderline Personality Disorder - physiopathology ; Brain Mapping ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Cortex (parietal) ; Fear &amp; phobias ; Feedback ; Feedback, Psychological - physiology ; Female ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Higher education ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Middle Aged ; Mood ; Original ; Parietal Lobe - diagnostic imaging ; Parietal Lobe - physiopathology ; Patient satisfaction ; Permission ; Personality ; Personality disorders ; Self Concept ; Self esteem ; Social Interaction ; Social interactions ; Temporal Lobe - diagnostic imaging ; Temporal Lobe - physiopathology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychological medicine, 2020-03, Vol.50 (4), p.625-635</ispartof><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Mar 2020</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2019 2019 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-1566361820600830cee793cff5fbbdd103f8920fd3841f475a0873b712eff55e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-1566361820600830cee793cff5fbbdd103f8920fd3841f475a0873b712eff55e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0631-3289</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,12846,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30867073$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Schie, Charlotte C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Chui-De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rombouts, Serge A R B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heiser, Willem J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elzinga, Bernet M</creatorcontrib><title>Stuck in a negative me: fMRI study on the role of disturbed self-views in social feedback processing in borderline personality disorder</title><title>Psychological medicine</title><addtitle>Psychol Med</addtitle><description>Interpersonal difficulties in borderline personality disorder (BPD) could be related to the disturbed self-views of BPD patients. This study investigates affective and neural responses to positive and negative social feedback (SF) of BPD patients compared with healthy (HC) and low self-esteem (LSE) controls and how this relates to individual self-views. BPD (N = 26), HC (N = 32), and LSE (N = 22) performed a SF task in a magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Participants received 15 negative, intermediate and positive evaluative feedback words putatively given by another participant and rated their mood and applicability of the words to the self. BPD had more negative self-views than HC and felt worse after negative feedback. Applicability of feedback was a less strong determinant of mood in BPD than HC. Increased precuneus activation was observed in HC to negative compared with positive feedback, whereas in BPD, this was similarly low for both valences. HC showed increased temporoparietal junction (TPJ) activation to positive v. negative feedback, while BPD showed more TPJ activation to negative feedback. The LSE group showed a different pattern of results suggesting that LSE cannot explain these findings in BPD. The negative self-views that BPD have, may obstruct critically examining negative feedback, resulting in lower mood. Moreover, where HC focus on the positive feedback (based on TPJ activation), BPD seem to focus more on negative feedback, potentially maintaining negative self-views. Better balanced self-views may make BPD better equipped to deal with potential negative feedback and more open to positive interactions.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attribution</subject><subject>Borderline personality disorder</subject><subject>Borderline Personality Disorder - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Borderline Personality Disorder - physiopathology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Cortex (parietal)</subject><subject>Fear &amp; phobias</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Feedback, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mood</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Parietal Lobe - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Parietal Lobe - physiopathology</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Permission</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Personality disorders</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Self esteem</subject><subject>Social Interaction</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Temporal Lobe - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Temporal Lobe - physiopathology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0033-2917</issn><issn>1469-8978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkV9rFDEUxYModq1-AF8k4IsvozeT2UnGB0GK1UJFsPocMsnNNjWbrMnMyn6Cfm0zthb_PF3IOffHPTmEPGXwkgETry4AOG8HJtgAAF0n75EV6_qhkYOQ98lqkZtFPyKPSrkCYJx17UNyxEH2AgRfkeuLaTbfqI9U04gbPfk90i2-pu7j5zNaptkeaIp0ukSaU0CaHLW-PucRLS0YXLP3-KMsgJKM14E6RDvqytzlZLAUHzeLOqZsMQcfke4wlxR18NNhgf0SHpMHToeCT27nMfl6-u7LyYfm_NP7s5O3543pWjE1bN33vGeyhR5AcjCIYuDGubUbR2sZcCeHFpzlsmOuE2sNUvBRsBarZ438mLy54e7mcYvWYJyyDmqX_Vbng0raq7-V6C_VJu2VgKH-NVTAi1tATt9nLJPa-mIwBB0xzUW1bGC8X3qp1uf_WK_SnGvw6uI1QtfWJNXFblwmp1IyurtjGKilZvVfzXXn2Z8p7jZ-98p_AoC-o_0</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>van Schie, Charlotte C</creator><creator>Chiu, Chui-De</creator><creator>Rombouts, Serge A R B</creator><creator>Heiser, Willem J</creator><creator>Elzinga, Bernet M</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0631-3289</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Stuck in a negative me: fMRI study on the role of disturbed self-views in social feedback processing in borderline personality disorder</title><author>van Schie, Charlotte C ; Chiu, Chui-De ; Rombouts, Serge A R B ; Heiser, Willem J ; Elzinga, Bernet M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-1566361820600830cee793cff5fbbdd103f8920fd3841f475a0873b712eff55e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attribution</topic><topic>Borderline personality disorder</topic><topic>Borderline Personality Disorder - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Borderline Personality Disorder - physiopathology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Cortex (parietal)</topic><topic>Fear &amp; phobias</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Feedback, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mood</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Parietal Lobe - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Parietal Lobe - physiopathology</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Permission</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Personality disorders</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Self esteem</topic><topic>Social Interaction</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Temporal Lobe - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Temporal Lobe - physiopathology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Schie, Charlotte C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Chui-De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rombouts, Serge A R B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heiser, Willem J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elzinga, Bernet M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest sociology</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychological medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Schie, Charlotte C</au><au>Chiu, Chui-De</au><au>Rombouts, Serge A R B</au><au>Heiser, Willem J</au><au>Elzinga, Bernet M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stuck in a negative me: fMRI study on the role of disturbed self-views in social feedback processing in borderline personality disorder</atitle><jtitle>Psychological medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Med</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>625</spage><epage>635</epage><pages>625-635</pages><issn>0033-2917</issn><eissn>1469-8978</eissn><abstract>Interpersonal difficulties in borderline personality disorder (BPD) could be related to the disturbed self-views of BPD patients. This study investigates affective and neural responses to positive and negative social feedback (SF) of BPD patients compared with healthy (HC) and low self-esteem (LSE) controls and how this relates to individual self-views. BPD (N = 26), HC (N = 32), and LSE (N = 22) performed a SF task in a magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Participants received 15 negative, intermediate and positive evaluative feedback words putatively given by another participant and rated their mood and applicability of the words to the self. BPD had more negative self-views than HC and felt worse after negative feedback. Applicability of feedback was a less strong determinant of mood in BPD than HC. Increased precuneus activation was observed in HC to negative compared with positive feedback, whereas in BPD, this was similarly low for both valences. HC showed increased temporoparietal junction (TPJ) activation to positive v. negative feedback, while BPD showed more TPJ activation to negative feedback. The LSE group showed a different pattern of results suggesting that LSE cannot explain these findings in BPD. The negative self-views that BPD have, may obstruct critically examining negative feedback, resulting in lower mood. Moreover, where HC focus on the positive feedback (based on TPJ activation), BPD seem to focus more on negative feedback, potentially maintaining negative self-views. Better balanced self-views may make BPD better equipped to deal with potential negative feedback and more open to positive interactions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>30867073</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0033291719000448</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0631-3289</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2917
ispartof Psychological medicine, 2020-03, Vol.50 (4), p.625-635
issn 0033-2917
1469-8978
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7093320
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Cambridge University Press Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Attribution
Borderline personality disorder
Borderline Personality Disorder - diagnostic imaging
Borderline Personality Disorder - physiopathology
Brain Mapping
Colleges & universities
Cortex (parietal)
Fear & phobias
Feedback
Feedback, Psychological - physiology
Female
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
Higher education
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Middle Aged
Mood
Original
Parietal Lobe - diagnostic imaging
Parietal Lobe - physiopathology
Patient satisfaction
Permission
Personality
Personality disorders
Self Concept
Self esteem
Social Interaction
Social interactions
Temporal Lobe - diagnostic imaging
Temporal Lobe - physiopathology
Young Adult
title Stuck in a negative me: fMRI study on the role of disturbed self-views in social feedback processing in borderline personality disorder
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A19%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stuck%20in%20a%20negative%20me:%20fMRI%20study%20on%20the%20role%20of%20disturbed%20self-views%20in%20social%20feedback%20processing%20in%20borderline%20personality%20disorder&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20medicine&rft.au=van%20Schie,%20Charlotte%20C&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=625&rft.epage=635&rft.pages=625-635&rft.issn=0033-2917&rft.eissn=1469-8978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0033291719000448&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2191360332%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2382042618&rft_id=info:pmid/30867073&rfr_iscdi=true