Farmer-Led Irrigation and its Impacts on Smallholder Farmers' Crop Income: Evidence from Southern Tanzania

Irrigation projects in sub-Saharan Africa are mostly unsustainable because of lack of maintenance by their users or government planners. By contrast, evidence shows that the smallholder farmers are developing and expanding the irrigated land, using their initiatives. Farmer-led irrigation, a revolut...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2020-02, Vol.17 (5), p.1512
Hauptverfasser: Osewe, Maurice, Liu, Aijun, Njagi, Tim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1512
container_title International journal of environmental research and public health
container_volume 17
creator Osewe, Maurice
Liu, Aijun
Njagi, Tim
description Irrigation projects in sub-Saharan Africa are mostly unsustainable because of lack of maintenance by their users or government planners. By contrast, evidence shows that the smallholder farmers are developing and expanding the irrigated land, using their initiatives. Farmer-led irrigation, a revolutionary agricultural intensification approach, is already in progress with the magnitude to significantly transform the living standards of smallholder farmers. However, a rigorous assessment of its impact on household welfare to ascertain this is lacking. This paper bridges this gap by assessing factors influencing the adoption of this particular approach as well as its effects on the farmers' per capita net crop income. Our data set consists of 608 smallholder farmers in Southern Tanzania and used propensity score matching to estimate the effects of adoption on the per capita net crop income. Our results indicate that the uptake of farmer-led irrigation practices is influenced by drought experience, water user group membership, farmer organization membership, and government extension, as well as the sex of the household head. Further, there was a positive and significant effect on the adopters' per capita net crop income, thus encouraging the need to promote farmer-led irrigation as a complement to externally promoted innovations in achieving sustainable food security. This study, therefore, recommends that the government should support the farmers' initiative by improving roads, removing market barriers, and helping farmers who have not yet taken up the initiative. Also, the government should enact regulations to make sure farmer-led irrigation initiatives do not harm the eco-environment such as protecting domestic water users. Finally, the government should leverage microservices to the farmers such as promoting affordable and appropriate credit facilities. It is necessary to continue pursuing this vein of research to gain information regarding the definite impact of the farmer-led irrigation on household welfare.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijerph17051512
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7084635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2369513313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-335c1c609589a2b8fd150b3ca8695573ba4dd623b171e27742ee7a0721ea83553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVpaNJtrjkGQQ_pxalGsvzRQ6AsSbuwkEOSsxjLs1kttuRKdqD56-t005AUBE-MfvOY0WPsBMS5UrX46nYUhy2UQoMG-Y4dQVGILC8EvH91P2QfU9oJoaq8qD-wQyUBQOT1EdtdYewpZmtq-SpGd4-jC56jb7kbE1_1A9pZ59JNj123DV1Lke-b0hlfxjDwlbehp2_88sG15C3xTQw9vwnTuKXo-S36R_QOP7GDDXaJjp91we6uLm-XP7P19Y_V8vs6szlUY6aUtmALUeuqRtlUmxa0aJTFqqi1LlWDedsWUjVQAsmyzCVRiaKUQFgprdWCXex9h6npqbXkx4idGaLrMf42AZ15--Ld1tyHB1OK-XvUk8GXZ4MYfk2URtO7ZKnr0FOYkpGqqHNQUuQz-vk_dBem6Of1_lIalJrPgp3vKRtDSpE2L8OAME8xmrcxzg2nr1d4wf_lpv4ARBiZXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2369513313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Farmer-Led Irrigation and its Impacts on Smallholder Farmers' Crop Income: Evidence from Southern Tanzania</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Osewe, Maurice ; Liu, Aijun ; Njagi, Tim</creator><creatorcontrib>Osewe, Maurice ; Liu, Aijun ; Njagi, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>Irrigation projects in sub-Saharan Africa are mostly unsustainable because of lack of maintenance by their users or government planners. By contrast, evidence shows that the smallholder farmers are developing and expanding the irrigated land, using their initiatives. Farmer-led irrigation, a revolutionary agricultural intensification approach, is already in progress with the magnitude to significantly transform the living standards of smallholder farmers. However, a rigorous assessment of its impact on household welfare to ascertain this is lacking. This paper bridges this gap by assessing factors influencing the adoption of this particular approach as well as its effects on the farmers' per capita net crop income. Our data set consists of 608 smallholder farmers in Southern Tanzania and used propensity score matching to estimate the effects of adoption on the per capita net crop income. Our results indicate that the uptake of farmer-led irrigation practices is influenced by drought experience, water user group membership, farmer organization membership, and government extension, as well as the sex of the household head. Further, there was a positive and significant effect on the adopters' per capita net crop income, thus encouraging the need to promote farmer-led irrigation as a complement to externally promoted innovations in achieving sustainable food security. This study, therefore, recommends that the government should support the farmers' initiative by improving roads, removing market barriers, and helping farmers who have not yet taken up the initiative. Also, the government should enact regulations to make sure farmer-led irrigation initiatives do not harm the eco-environment such as protecting domestic water users. Finally, the government should leverage microservices to the farmers such as promoting affordable and appropriate credit facilities. It is necessary to continue pursuing this vein of research to gain information regarding the definite impact of the farmer-led irrigation on household welfare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051512</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32111049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agriculture ; Canals ; Climate change ; Crops ; Domestic water ; Drought ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Farmers ; Farming ; Food security ; Gasoline ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Innovations ; Irrigated lands ; Irrigation ; Irrigation practices ; Productivity ; Small farms ; Standard of living ; Studies ; User groups ; Water consumption ; Water resources ; Water users</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020-02, Vol.17 (5), p.1512</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-335c1c609589a2b8fd150b3ca8695573ba4dd623b171e27742ee7a0721ea83553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-335c1c609589a2b8fd150b3ca8695573ba4dd623b171e27742ee7a0721ea83553</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4070-7652 ; 0000-0003-4709-6495</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7084635/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7084635/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32111049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osewe, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Aijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Njagi, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>Farmer-Led Irrigation and its Impacts on Smallholder Farmers' Crop Income: Evidence from Southern Tanzania</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>Irrigation projects in sub-Saharan Africa are mostly unsustainable because of lack of maintenance by their users or government planners. By contrast, evidence shows that the smallholder farmers are developing and expanding the irrigated land, using their initiatives. Farmer-led irrigation, a revolutionary agricultural intensification approach, is already in progress with the magnitude to significantly transform the living standards of smallholder farmers. However, a rigorous assessment of its impact on household welfare to ascertain this is lacking. This paper bridges this gap by assessing factors influencing the adoption of this particular approach as well as its effects on the farmers' per capita net crop income. Our data set consists of 608 smallholder farmers in Southern Tanzania and used propensity score matching to estimate the effects of adoption on the per capita net crop income. Our results indicate that the uptake of farmer-led irrigation practices is influenced by drought experience, water user group membership, farmer organization membership, and government extension, as well as the sex of the household head. Further, there was a positive and significant effect on the adopters' per capita net crop income, thus encouraging the need to promote farmer-led irrigation as a complement to externally promoted innovations in achieving sustainable food security. This study, therefore, recommends that the government should support the farmers' initiative by improving roads, removing market barriers, and helping farmers who have not yet taken up the initiative. Also, the government should enact regulations to make sure farmer-led irrigation initiatives do not harm the eco-environment such as protecting domestic water users. Finally, the government should leverage microservices to the farmers such as promoting affordable and appropriate credit facilities. It is necessary to continue pursuing this vein of research to gain information regarding the definite impact of the farmer-led irrigation on household welfare.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Canals</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Domestic water</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Irrigated lands</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Irrigation practices</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Small farms</subject><subject>Standard of living</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>User groups</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water users</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVpaNJtrjkGQQ_pxalGsvzRQ6AsSbuwkEOSsxjLs1kttuRKdqD56-t005AUBE-MfvOY0WPsBMS5UrX46nYUhy2UQoMG-Y4dQVGILC8EvH91P2QfU9oJoaq8qD-wQyUBQOT1EdtdYewpZmtq-SpGd4-jC56jb7kbE1_1A9pZ59JNj123DV1Lke-b0hlfxjDwlbehp2_88sG15C3xTQw9vwnTuKXo-S36R_QOP7GDDXaJjp91we6uLm-XP7P19Y_V8vs6szlUY6aUtmALUeuqRtlUmxa0aJTFqqi1LlWDedsWUjVQAsmyzCVRiaKUQFgprdWCXex9h6npqbXkx4idGaLrMf42AZ15--Ld1tyHB1OK-XvUk8GXZ4MYfk2URtO7ZKnr0FOYkpGqqHNQUuQz-vk_dBem6Of1_lIalJrPgp3vKRtDSpE2L8OAME8xmrcxzg2nr1d4wf_lpv4ARBiZXg</recordid><startdate>20200226</startdate><enddate>20200226</enddate><creator>Osewe, Maurice</creator><creator>Liu, Aijun</creator><creator>Njagi, Tim</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4070-7652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4709-6495</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200226</creationdate><title>Farmer-Led Irrigation and its Impacts on Smallholder Farmers' Crop Income: Evidence from Southern Tanzania</title><author>Osewe, Maurice ; Liu, Aijun ; Njagi, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-335c1c609589a2b8fd150b3ca8695573ba4dd623b171e27742ee7a0721ea83553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Canals</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Domestic water</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Irrigated lands</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Irrigation practices</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Small farms</topic><topic>Standard of living</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>User groups</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water users</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osewe, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Aijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Njagi, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osewe, Maurice</au><au>Liu, Aijun</au><au>Njagi, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Farmer-Led Irrigation and its Impacts on Smallholder Farmers' Crop Income: Evidence from Southern Tanzania</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2020-02-26</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1512</spage><pages>1512-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Irrigation projects in sub-Saharan Africa are mostly unsustainable because of lack of maintenance by their users or government planners. By contrast, evidence shows that the smallholder farmers are developing and expanding the irrigated land, using their initiatives. Farmer-led irrigation, a revolutionary agricultural intensification approach, is already in progress with the magnitude to significantly transform the living standards of smallholder farmers. However, a rigorous assessment of its impact on household welfare to ascertain this is lacking. This paper bridges this gap by assessing factors influencing the adoption of this particular approach as well as its effects on the farmers' per capita net crop income. Our data set consists of 608 smallholder farmers in Southern Tanzania and used propensity score matching to estimate the effects of adoption on the per capita net crop income. Our results indicate that the uptake of farmer-led irrigation practices is influenced by drought experience, water user group membership, farmer organization membership, and government extension, as well as the sex of the household head. Further, there was a positive and significant effect on the adopters' per capita net crop income, thus encouraging the need to promote farmer-led irrigation as a complement to externally promoted innovations in achieving sustainable food security. This study, therefore, recommends that the government should support the farmers' initiative by improving roads, removing market barriers, and helping farmers who have not yet taken up the initiative. Also, the government should enact regulations to make sure farmer-led irrigation initiatives do not harm the eco-environment such as protecting domestic water users. Finally, the government should leverage microservices to the farmers such as promoting affordable and appropriate credit facilities. It is necessary to continue pursuing this vein of research to gain information regarding the definite impact of the farmer-led irrigation on household welfare.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>32111049</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph17051512</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4070-7652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4709-6495</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-4601
ispartof International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020-02, Vol.17 (5), p.1512
issn 1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7084635
source PubMed Central Free; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Agricultural practices
Agriculture
Canals
Climate change
Crops
Domestic water
Drought
Economic development
Economic growth
Farmers
Farming
Food security
Gasoline
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
Innovations
Irrigated lands
Irrigation
Irrigation practices
Productivity
Small farms
Standard of living
Studies
User groups
Water consumption
Water resources
Water users
title Farmer-Led Irrigation and its Impacts on Smallholder Farmers' Crop Income: Evidence from Southern Tanzania
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T08%3A00%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Farmer-Led%20Irrigation%20and%20its%20Impacts%20on%20Smallholder%20Farmers'%20Crop%20Income:%20Evidence%20from%20Southern%20Tanzania&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Osewe,%20Maurice&rft.date=2020-02-26&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1512&rft.pages=1512-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph17051512&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2369513313%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2369513313&rft_id=info:pmid/32111049&rfr_iscdi=true