The effect of reproductive loss on the performance of a research flock
Abstract The reproductive performance of a sheep flock is dependent on a multitude of complex interacting factors. Achieving optimal flock performance requires knowledge of the reproductive steps and how these are linked and related to available measurements of the state and performance of the flock...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2020-03, Vol.98 (3), p.1-15 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 15 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Shorten, Paul R Edwards, Sara J Juengel, Jenny L |
description | Abstract
The reproductive performance of a sheep flock is dependent on a multitude of complex interacting factors. Achieving optimal flock performance requires knowledge of the reproductive steps and how these are linked and related to available measurements of the state and performance of the flock. The goal was to use previously collected data from a research flock that had undergone selection for fecundity (11,369 lambing records), to model the key reproductive steps affecting flock reproductive performance. The model was used to investigate how changes in liveweight, age, ovulation rate, number of fetuses at midpregnancy, number of lambs born, and birthweight affect the number of lambs weaned and the weaning weight of each lamb in this flock. The data available from the research flock were used to parameterize models of each reproductive step and assess the role of ewe age and premating liveweight on each reproductive step. These models were then linked together as a simulation tool to assess the role of different parameters on flock reproductive performance, which was defined as the total weight of lambs weaned per ewe exposed to the ram. Flock elasticities were calculated that characterize the relative importance of the effect of average premating ewe liveweight (0.81), average ovulation rate (0.33), variance in ovulation rate (−0.095), embryo survival (0.72), lamb survival (1.03), conception failure (0.35), and average ewe age (0.056) on the total kilograms of lamb liveweight at weaning per ewe exposed to the ram. The largest elasticity for lamb survival indicated that a 1% increase in lamb survival is expected to have a 1.03% increase in the total kilograms of lamb liveweight at weaning per ewe exposed to the ram in this flock. Assuming similar costs, interventions to increase lamb survival for this flock will provide the largest increase in the total kilograms of lamb liveweight at weaning per ewe exposed to the ram, which is a key metric of flock performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jas/skaa055 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7076130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jas/skaa055</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2388008556</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7593797b31aacc7b42b852ea0365a6a65d63bc5553b063ec997698bb433e71bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c9L5DAUB_Agio4_TntfCoIIS_Wl6UvTiyCiqyB40XNIMq9Ox05Tk1bY_97IzMquB085vA9f3suXsR8czjjU4nxp4nl8MQYQt9iMY4G54FJssxlAwXOleLHH9mNcAvACa9xle6IAWaLgM3bzuKCMmobcmPkmCzQEP5_c2L5R1vkYM99nYyIDhcaHlekdfTiTZCQT3CJrOu9eDtlOY7pIR5v3gD3dXD9e3eb3D7_vri7vc1eWMOYV1qKqKyu4Mc5VtiyswoIMCIlGGolzKaxDRGFBCnJ1XclaWVsKQRW3jThgF-vcYbIrmjvqx2A6PYR2ZcIf7U2r_5_07UI_-zddQSW5gBRwugkI_nWiOOpVGx11nenJT1EXAqWEWnGV6PEXuvRT6NN5SSkFoBBlUr_WyoX0XYGaz2U46I9-dOpHb_pJ-ue_-3_av4UkcLIGfhq-TXoHqyOZJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2388008556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of reproductive loss on the performance of a research flock</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Shorten, Paul R ; Edwards, Sara J ; Juengel, Jenny L</creator><creatorcontrib>Shorten, Paul R ; Edwards, Sara J ; Juengel, Jenny L</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
The reproductive performance of a sheep flock is dependent on a multitude of complex interacting factors. Achieving optimal flock performance requires knowledge of the reproductive steps and how these are linked and related to available measurements of the state and performance of the flock. The goal was to use previously collected data from a research flock that had undergone selection for fecundity (11,369 lambing records), to model the key reproductive steps affecting flock reproductive performance. The model was used to investigate how changes in liveweight, age, ovulation rate, number of fetuses at midpregnancy, number of lambs born, and birthweight affect the number of lambs weaned and the weaning weight of each lamb in this flock. The data available from the research flock were used to parameterize models of each reproductive step and assess the role of ewe age and premating liveweight on each reproductive step. These models were then linked together as a simulation tool to assess the role of different parameters on flock reproductive performance, which was defined as the total weight of lambs weaned per ewe exposed to the ram. Flock elasticities were calculated that characterize the relative importance of the effect of average premating ewe liveweight (0.81), average ovulation rate (0.33), variance in ovulation rate (−0.095), embryo survival (0.72), lamb survival (1.03), conception failure (0.35), and average ewe age (0.056) on the total kilograms of lamb liveweight at weaning per ewe exposed to the ram. The largest elasticity for lamb survival indicated that a 1% increase in lamb survival is expected to have a 1.03% increase in the total kilograms of lamb liveweight at weaning per ewe exposed to the ram in this flock. Assuming similar costs, interventions to increase lamb survival for this flock will provide the largest increase in the total kilograms of lamb liveweight at weaning per ewe exposed to the ram, which is a key metric of flock performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32064531</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Age ; Animal reproduction ; Animals ; Birth Weight ; Body Weight ; Computer simulation ; Data collection ; Embryos ; Exposure ; Fecundity ; Female ; Fertility ; Fetuses ; Growth rate ; Lamb ; Male ; Ovulation ; Reproduction ; Sheep ; Sheep - physiology ; Survival ; Weaning ; Weight</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2020-03, Vol.98 (3), p.1-15</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Mar 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7593797b31aacc7b42b852ea0365a6a65d63bc5553b063ec997698bb433e71bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7593797b31aacc7b42b852ea0365a6a65d63bc5553b063ec997698bb433e71bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7076130/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7076130/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1584,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32064531$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shorten, Paul R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Sara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juengel, Jenny L</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of reproductive loss on the performance of a research flock</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Abstract
The reproductive performance of a sheep flock is dependent on a multitude of complex interacting factors. Achieving optimal flock performance requires knowledge of the reproductive steps and how these are linked and related to available measurements of the state and performance of the flock. The goal was to use previously collected data from a research flock that had undergone selection for fecundity (11,369 lambing records), to model the key reproductive steps affecting flock reproductive performance. The model was used to investigate how changes in liveweight, age, ovulation rate, number of fetuses at midpregnancy, number of lambs born, and birthweight affect the number of lambs weaned and the weaning weight of each lamb in this flock. The data available from the research flock were used to parameterize models of each reproductive step and assess the role of ewe age and premating liveweight on each reproductive step. These models were then linked together as a simulation tool to assess the role of different parameters on flock reproductive performance, which was defined as the total weight of lambs weaned per ewe exposed to the ram. Flock elasticities were calculated that characterize the relative importance of the effect of average premating ewe liveweight (0.81), average ovulation rate (0.33), variance in ovulation rate (−0.095), embryo survival (0.72), lamb survival (1.03), conception failure (0.35), and average ewe age (0.056) on the total kilograms of lamb liveweight at weaning per ewe exposed to the ram. The largest elasticity for lamb survival indicated that a 1% increase in lamb survival is expected to have a 1.03% increase in the total kilograms of lamb liveweight at weaning per ewe exposed to the ram in this flock. Assuming similar costs, interventions to increase lamb survival for this flock will provide the largest increase in the total kilograms of lamb liveweight at weaning per ewe exposed to the ram, which is a key metric of flock performance.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Lamb</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Ovulation</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Sheep - physiology</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Weaning</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90c9L5DAUB_Agio4_TntfCoIIS_Wl6UvTiyCiqyB40XNIMq9Ox05Tk1bY_97IzMquB085vA9f3suXsR8czjjU4nxp4nl8MQYQt9iMY4G54FJssxlAwXOleLHH9mNcAvACa9xle6IAWaLgM3bzuKCMmobcmPkmCzQEP5_c2L5R1vkYM99nYyIDhcaHlekdfTiTZCQT3CJrOu9eDtlOY7pIR5v3gD3dXD9e3eb3D7_vri7vc1eWMOYV1qKqKyu4Mc5VtiyswoIMCIlGGolzKaxDRGFBCnJ1XclaWVsKQRW3jThgF-vcYbIrmjvqx2A6PYR2ZcIf7U2r_5_07UI_-zddQSW5gBRwugkI_nWiOOpVGx11nenJT1EXAqWEWnGV6PEXuvRT6NN5SSkFoBBlUr_WyoX0XYGaz2U46I9-dOpHb_pJ-ue_-3_av4UkcLIGfhq-TXoHqyOZJg</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Shorten, Paul R</creator><creator>Edwards, Sara J</creator><creator>Juengel, Jenny L</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>The effect of reproductive loss on the performance of a research flock</title><author>Shorten, Paul R ; Edwards, Sara J ; Juengel, Jenny L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7593797b31aacc7b42b852ea0365a6a65d63bc5553b063ec997698bb433e71bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Lamb</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Ovulation</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Sheep - physiology</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Weaning</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shorten, Paul R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Sara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juengel, Jenny L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shorten, Paul R</au><au>Edwards, Sara J</au><au>Juengel, Jenny L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of reproductive loss on the performance of a research flock</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1-15</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Abstract
The reproductive performance of a sheep flock is dependent on a multitude of complex interacting factors. Achieving optimal flock performance requires knowledge of the reproductive steps and how these are linked and related to available measurements of the state and performance of the flock. The goal was to use previously collected data from a research flock that had undergone selection for fecundity (11,369 lambing records), to model the key reproductive steps affecting flock reproductive performance. The model was used to investigate how changes in liveweight, age, ovulation rate, number of fetuses at midpregnancy, number of lambs born, and birthweight affect the number of lambs weaned and the weaning weight of each lamb in this flock. The data available from the research flock were used to parameterize models of each reproductive step and assess the role of ewe age and premating liveweight on each reproductive step. These models were then linked together as a simulation tool to assess the role of different parameters on flock reproductive performance, which was defined as the total weight of lambs weaned per ewe exposed to the ram. Flock elasticities were calculated that characterize the relative importance of the effect of average premating ewe liveweight (0.81), average ovulation rate (0.33), variance in ovulation rate (−0.095), embryo survival (0.72), lamb survival (1.03), conception failure (0.35), and average ewe age (0.056) on the total kilograms of lamb liveweight at weaning per ewe exposed to the ram. The largest elasticity for lamb survival indicated that a 1% increase in lamb survival is expected to have a 1.03% increase in the total kilograms of lamb liveweight at weaning per ewe exposed to the ram in this flock. Assuming similar costs, interventions to increase lamb survival for this flock will provide the largest increase in the total kilograms of lamb liveweight at weaning per ewe exposed to the ram, which is a key metric of flock performance.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>32064531</pmid><doi>10.1093/jas/skaa055</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2020-03, Vol.98 (3), p.1-15 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7076130 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Age Animal reproduction Animals Birth Weight Body Weight Computer simulation Data collection Embryos Exposure Fecundity Female Fertility Fetuses Growth rate Lamb Male Ovulation Reproduction Sheep Sheep - physiology Survival Weaning Weight |
title | The effect of reproductive loss on the performance of a research flock |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T10%3A41%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20reproductive%20loss%20on%20the%20performance%20of%20a%20research%20flock&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Shorten,%20Paul%20R&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1-15&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/skaa055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2388008556%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2388008556&rft_id=info:pmid/32064531&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jas/skaa055&rfr_iscdi=true |