Comparison of Enamel Preparations - Bevel, Chamfer and Stair Step Chamfer on Fracture Resistance of Nano Filled Resin Composites Using Bulk Pack Technique - An In Vitro Study

To evaluate and compare the effect of enamel preparation designs bevel, chamfer and stair-step chamfer on the fracture resistance of nanocomposite. The sample group of this study consisted of 72 non-carious permanent maxillary central incisors. The sample is divided into four groups of 18 each. Grou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences 2019-12, Vol.7 (23), p.4089-4093
Hauptverfasser: Bommanagoudar, Jyothi, Chandrashekhar, Shashidhar, Sharma, Shilpa, Jain, Hiten
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4093
container_issue 23
container_start_page 4089
container_title Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences
container_volume 7
creator Bommanagoudar, Jyothi
Chandrashekhar, Shashidhar
Sharma, Shilpa
Jain, Hiten
description To evaluate and compare the effect of enamel preparation designs bevel, chamfer and stair-step chamfer on the fracture resistance of nanocomposite. The sample group of this study consisted of 72 non-carious permanent maxillary central incisors. The sample is divided into four groups of 18 each. Group, I control Group II bevel preparation, Group III chamfer preparation, group IV stair step chamfer preparation. After the specific preparation, each tooth is filled with nanocomposite using bulk pack technique. The teeth were subjected to fracture resistance test under Universal testing machine and then were examined under a stereomicroscope to evaluate the type of bond failure. The results were subjected to statistical analysis. Results of the One-Way ANOVA revealed a significant difference in the mean peak failure load values of the four different groups. (P < 0.001) Tukey's Post-Hoc comparison test revealed that there was a significant difference in the mean peak failure load values of the bevel and chamfer preparation. But there was no significant difference between chamfer and stair-step chamfer preparation designs. Stair-step chamfer preparation demonstrated comparable values to Chamfer preparation but also involved the removal of less amount of tooth structure adjacent to the fractured edge and good esthetic technique.
doi_str_mv 10.3889/oamjms.2019.853
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7061382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2377348458</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2623-ccb68d2e8833ef67d1d9d53a5c6bc97d73b504719ba6990f63cc01136b826efe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtP3DAUha2qFSDKml3lZRfN4MfYsTeVYMS0SKhF5bG1HOeGMST2YCdI_Kn-xno6dEQ3ftx77ndsHYSOKZlxpfRJtMPDkGeMUD1Tgr9DB1SJutJSiPdvzvvoKOcHQggVWlLG9tA-Z1QKLdQB-r2Iw9omn2PAscPnwQ7Q46sEpWhHH0PGFT6DZ-i_4MXKDh0kbEOLr0frU1lhvSsXwjJZN04J8C_IPo82ONhQf9gQ8dL3PbR_OwFvXGP2I2R8W-73-GzqH_GVdY_4Btwq-KcJivFpwBcB3_kxxeI1tS8f0YfO9hmOXvdDdLs8v1l8ry5_frtYnF5WjknGK-caqVoGSnEOnaxb2upWcCucbJyu25o3gsxrqhsrtSad5M4RSrlsFJPQAT9EX7fc9dQM0DoIY7K9WSc_2PRiovXm_07wK3Mfn01NJOWKFcDnV0CK5S95NIPPDvreBohTNozXNZ-ruVBFerKVuhRzTtDtbCgxm6DNNmizCdqUoMvEp7ev2-n_xcr_APQJp6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2377348458</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Enamel Preparations - Bevel, Chamfer and Stair Step Chamfer on Fracture Resistance of Nano Filled Resin Composites Using Bulk Pack Technique - An In Vitro Study</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bommanagoudar, Jyothi ; Chandrashekhar, Shashidhar ; Sharma, Shilpa ; Jain, Hiten</creator><creatorcontrib>Bommanagoudar, Jyothi ; Chandrashekhar, Shashidhar ; Sharma, Shilpa ; Jain, Hiten</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate and compare the effect of enamel preparation designs bevel, chamfer and stair-step chamfer on the fracture resistance of nanocomposite. The sample group of this study consisted of 72 non-carious permanent maxillary central incisors. The sample is divided into four groups of 18 each. Group, I control Group II bevel preparation, Group III chamfer preparation, group IV stair step chamfer preparation. After the specific preparation, each tooth is filled with nanocomposite using bulk pack technique. The teeth were subjected to fracture resistance test under Universal testing machine and then were examined under a stereomicroscope to evaluate the type of bond failure. The results were subjected to statistical analysis. Results of the One-Way ANOVA revealed a significant difference in the mean peak failure load values of the four different groups. (P &lt; 0.001) Tukey's Post-Hoc comparison test revealed that there was a significant difference in the mean peak failure load values of the bevel and chamfer preparation. But there was no significant difference between chamfer and stair-step chamfer preparation designs. Stair-step chamfer preparation demonstrated comparable values to Chamfer preparation but also involved the removal of less amount of tooth structure adjacent to the fractured edge and good esthetic technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1857-9655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1857-9655</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.853</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32165958</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>North Macedonia: Republic of Macedonia</publisher><subject>Dental Sciences</subject><ispartof>Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 2019-12, Vol.7 (23), p.4089-4093</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2019 Jyothi Bommanagoudar, Shashidhar Chandrashekhar, Shilpa Sharma, Hiten Jain.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2019 Jyothi Bommanagoudar, Shashidhar Chandrashekhar, Shilpa Sharma, Hiten Jain. 2019</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061382/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7061382/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32165958$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bommanagoudar, Jyothi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrashekhar, Shashidhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Shilpa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Hiten</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Enamel Preparations - Bevel, Chamfer and Stair Step Chamfer on Fracture Resistance of Nano Filled Resin Composites Using Bulk Pack Technique - An In Vitro Study</title><title>Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences</title><addtitle>Open Access Maced J Med Sci</addtitle><description>To evaluate and compare the effect of enamel preparation designs bevel, chamfer and stair-step chamfer on the fracture resistance of nanocomposite. The sample group of this study consisted of 72 non-carious permanent maxillary central incisors. The sample is divided into four groups of 18 each. Group, I control Group II bevel preparation, Group III chamfer preparation, group IV stair step chamfer preparation. After the specific preparation, each tooth is filled with nanocomposite using bulk pack technique. The teeth were subjected to fracture resistance test under Universal testing machine and then were examined under a stereomicroscope to evaluate the type of bond failure. The results were subjected to statistical analysis. Results of the One-Way ANOVA revealed a significant difference in the mean peak failure load values of the four different groups. (P &lt; 0.001) Tukey's Post-Hoc comparison test revealed that there was a significant difference in the mean peak failure load values of the bevel and chamfer preparation. But there was no significant difference between chamfer and stair-step chamfer preparation designs. Stair-step chamfer preparation demonstrated comparable values to Chamfer preparation but also involved the removal of less amount of tooth structure adjacent to the fractured edge and good esthetic technique.</description><subject>Dental Sciences</subject><issn>1857-9655</issn><issn>1857-9655</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUtP3DAUha2qFSDKml3lZRfN4MfYsTeVYMS0SKhF5bG1HOeGMST2YCdI_Kn-xno6dEQ3ftx77ndsHYSOKZlxpfRJtMPDkGeMUD1Tgr9DB1SJutJSiPdvzvvoKOcHQggVWlLG9tA-Z1QKLdQB-r2Iw9omn2PAscPnwQ7Q46sEpWhHH0PGFT6DZ-i_4MXKDh0kbEOLr0frU1lhvSsXwjJZN04J8C_IPo82ONhQf9gQ8dL3PbR_OwFvXGP2I2R8W-73-GzqH_GVdY_4Btwq-KcJivFpwBcB3_kxxeI1tS8f0YfO9hmOXvdDdLs8v1l8ry5_frtYnF5WjknGK-caqVoGSnEOnaxb2upWcCucbJyu25o3gsxrqhsrtSad5M4RSrlsFJPQAT9EX7fc9dQM0DoIY7K9WSc_2PRiovXm_07wK3Mfn01NJOWKFcDnV0CK5S95NIPPDvreBohTNozXNZ-ruVBFerKVuhRzTtDtbCgxm6DNNmizCdqUoMvEp7ev2-n_xcr_APQJp6g</recordid><startdate>20191215</startdate><enddate>20191215</enddate><creator>Bommanagoudar, Jyothi</creator><creator>Chandrashekhar, Shashidhar</creator><creator>Sharma, Shilpa</creator><creator>Jain, Hiten</creator><general>Republic of Macedonia</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191215</creationdate><title>Comparison of Enamel Preparations - Bevel, Chamfer and Stair Step Chamfer on Fracture Resistance of Nano Filled Resin Composites Using Bulk Pack Technique - An In Vitro Study</title><author>Bommanagoudar, Jyothi ; Chandrashekhar, Shashidhar ; Sharma, Shilpa ; Jain, Hiten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2623-ccb68d2e8833ef67d1d9d53a5c6bc97d73b504719ba6990f63cc01136b826efe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Dental Sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bommanagoudar, Jyothi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrashekhar, Shashidhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Shilpa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Hiten</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bommanagoudar, Jyothi</au><au>Chandrashekhar, Shashidhar</au><au>Sharma, Shilpa</au><au>Jain, Hiten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Enamel Preparations - Bevel, Chamfer and Stair Step Chamfer on Fracture Resistance of Nano Filled Resin Composites Using Bulk Pack Technique - An In Vitro Study</atitle><jtitle>Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Open Access Maced J Med Sci</addtitle><date>2019-12-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>4089</spage><epage>4093</epage><pages>4089-4093</pages><issn>1857-9655</issn><eissn>1857-9655</eissn><abstract>To evaluate and compare the effect of enamel preparation designs bevel, chamfer and stair-step chamfer on the fracture resistance of nanocomposite. The sample group of this study consisted of 72 non-carious permanent maxillary central incisors. The sample is divided into four groups of 18 each. Group, I control Group II bevel preparation, Group III chamfer preparation, group IV stair step chamfer preparation. After the specific preparation, each tooth is filled with nanocomposite using bulk pack technique. The teeth were subjected to fracture resistance test under Universal testing machine and then were examined under a stereomicroscope to evaluate the type of bond failure. The results were subjected to statistical analysis. Results of the One-Way ANOVA revealed a significant difference in the mean peak failure load values of the four different groups. (P &lt; 0.001) Tukey's Post-Hoc comparison test revealed that there was a significant difference in the mean peak failure load values of the bevel and chamfer preparation. But there was no significant difference between chamfer and stair-step chamfer preparation designs. Stair-step chamfer preparation demonstrated comparable values to Chamfer preparation but also involved the removal of less amount of tooth structure adjacent to the fractured edge and good esthetic technique.</abstract><cop>North Macedonia</cop><pub>Republic of Macedonia</pub><pmid>32165958</pmid><doi>10.3889/oamjms.2019.853</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1857-9655
ispartof Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 2019-12, Vol.7 (23), p.4089-4093
issn 1857-9655
1857-9655
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7061382
source PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Dental Sciences
title Comparison of Enamel Preparations - Bevel, Chamfer and Stair Step Chamfer on Fracture Resistance of Nano Filled Resin Composites Using Bulk Pack Technique - An In Vitro Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A07%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Enamel%20Preparations%20-%20Bevel,%20Chamfer%20and%20Stair%20Step%20Chamfer%20on%20Fracture%20Resistance%20of%20Nano%20Filled%20Resin%20Composites%20Using%20Bulk%20Pack%20Technique%20-%20An%20In%20Vitro%20Study&rft.jtitle=Open%20access%20Macedonian%20journal%20of%20medical%20sciences&rft.au=Bommanagoudar,%20Jyothi&rft.date=2019-12-15&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=4089&rft.epage=4093&rft.pages=4089-4093&rft.issn=1857-9655&rft.eissn=1857-9655&rft_id=info:doi/10.3889/oamjms.2019.853&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2377348458%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2377348458&rft_id=info:pmid/32165958&rfr_iscdi=true