Assessing auditory processing endophenotypes associated with Schizophrenia in individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (22q11.2DS) is the strongest known molecular risk factor for schizophrenia. Brain responses to auditory stimuli have been studied extensively in schizophrenia and described as potential biomarkers of vulnerability to psychosis. We sought to understand whether these response...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Translational psychiatry 2020-03, Vol.10 (1), p.85-85, Article 85
Hauptverfasser: Francisco, Ana A., Foxe, John J., Horsthuis, Douwe J., DeMaio, Danielle, Molholm, Sophie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 85
container_issue 1
container_start_page 85
container_title Translational psychiatry
container_volume 10
creator Francisco, Ana A.
Foxe, John J.
Horsthuis, Douwe J.
DeMaio, Danielle
Molholm, Sophie
description 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (22q11.2DS) is the strongest known molecular risk factor for schizophrenia. Brain responses to auditory stimuli have been studied extensively in schizophrenia and described as potential biomarkers of vulnerability to psychosis. We sought to understand whether these responses might aid in differentiating individuals with 22q11.2DS as a function of psychotic symptoms, and ultimately serve as signals of risk for schizophrenia. A duration oddball paradigm and high-density electrophysiology were used to test auditory processing in 26 individuals with 22q11.2DS (13–35 years old, 17 females) with varying degrees of psychotic symptomatology and in 26 age- and sex-matched neurotypical controls (NT). Presentation rate varied across three levels, to examine the effect of increasing demands on memory and the integrity of sensory adaptation. We tested whether N1 and mismatch negativity (MMN), typically reduced in schizophrenia, related to clinical/cognitive measures, and how they were affected by presentation rate. N1 adaptation effects interacted with psychotic symptomatology: Compared to an NT group, individuals with 22q11.2DS but no psychotic symptomatology presented larger adaptation effects, whereas those with psychotic symptomatology presented smaller effects. In contrast, individuals with 22q11.2DS showed increased effects of presentation rate on MMN amplitude, regardless of the presence of symptoms. While IQ and working memory were lower in the 22q11.2DS group, these measures did not correlate with the electrophysiological data. These findings suggest the presence of two distinct mechanisms: One intrinsic to 22q11.2DS resulting in increased N1 and MMN responses; another related to psychosis leading to a decreased N1 response.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41398-020-0764-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7058163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2374361217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-b849bfe628e71dc4f08f15d2b41c59408c0941af50e552f8c033cc3d516735333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1r3DAQhk1paEKaH9BLMfTSi1ONPiz5UgihXxDoIe1ZaKXxroJXciQ77fbXV4u3aVpIhEAf88yrGfRW1Ssg50CYepc5sE41hJKGyJY37Fl1QkGohoFSzx_sj6uznG9IGYIrkPCiOma05LYdPal-XuSMOfuwrs3s_BTTrh5TtIc7DC6OGwxx2o2Ya5NztN5M6OofftrU13bjfxUgYfCm9qFM5--8m82QF4LSW4BzWjsccPIx1HkXXIpbfFkd9YXCs8N6Wn3_-OHb5efm6uunL5cXV43lnZqaleLdqseWKpTgLO-J6kE4uuJgRceJsqTjYHpBUAjalyNj1jInoJVMMMZOq_eL7jivtugshimZQY_Jb03a6Wi8_jcS_Eav452WRCho9wJvDwIp3s6YJ7312eIwmIBxzpoyyVkLFGRB3_yH3sQ5hdKeplxJKhQR5EmKSVBAVdcWChbKpphzwv6-ZCB6bwC9GEAXA-i9AfS-1NcPe73P-PPdBaALkEsorDH9ffpx1d9XMbyB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2371812896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing auditory processing endophenotypes associated with Schizophrenia in individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Francisco, Ana A. ; Foxe, John J. ; Horsthuis, Douwe J. ; DeMaio, Danielle ; Molholm, Sophie</creator><creatorcontrib>Francisco, Ana A. ; Foxe, John J. ; Horsthuis, Douwe J. ; DeMaio, Danielle ; Molholm, Sophie</creatorcontrib><description>22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (22q11.2DS) is the strongest known molecular risk factor for schizophrenia. Brain responses to auditory stimuli have been studied extensively in schizophrenia and described as potential biomarkers of vulnerability to psychosis. We sought to understand whether these responses might aid in differentiating individuals with 22q11.2DS as a function of psychotic symptoms, and ultimately serve as signals of risk for schizophrenia. A duration oddball paradigm and high-density electrophysiology were used to test auditory processing in 26 individuals with 22q11.2DS (13–35 years old, 17 females) with varying degrees of psychotic symptomatology and in 26 age- and sex-matched neurotypical controls (NT). Presentation rate varied across three levels, to examine the effect of increasing demands on memory and the integrity of sensory adaptation. We tested whether N1 and mismatch negativity (MMN), typically reduced in schizophrenia, related to clinical/cognitive measures, and how they were affected by presentation rate. N1 adaptation effects interacted with psychotic symptomatology: Compared to an NT group, individuals with 22q11.2DS but no psychotic symptomatology presented larger adaptation effects, whereas those with psychotic symptomatology presented smaller effects. In contrast, individuals with 22q11.2DS showed increased effects of presentation rate on MMN amplitude, regardless of the presence of symptoms. While IQ and working memory were lower in the 22q11.2DS group, these measures did not correlate with the electrophysiological data. These findings suggest the presence of two distinct mechanisms: One intrinsic to 22q11.2DS resulting in increased N1 and MMN responses; another related to psychosis leading to a decreased N1 response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2158-3188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2158-3188</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41398-020-0764-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32139692</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/378 ; 692/53 ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biological Psychology ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neurosciences ; Pharmacotherapy ; Psychiatry ; Psychosis ; Schizophrenia</subject><ispartof>Translational psychiatry, 2020-03, Vol.10 (1), p.85-85, Article 85</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-b849bfe628e71dc4f08f15d2b41c59408c0941af50e552f8c033cc3d516735333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-b849bfe628e71dc4f08f15d2b41c59408c0941af50e552f8c033cc3d516735333</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4030-0297 ; 0000-0002-4300-3098</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7058163/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7058163/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924,41119,42188,51575,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32139692$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Francisco, Ana A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foxe, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horsthuis, Douwe J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMaio, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molholm, Sophie</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing auditory processing endophenotypes associated with Schizophrenia in individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome</title><title>Translational psychiatry</title><addtitle>Transl Psychiatry</addtitle><addtitle>Transl Psychiatry</addtitle><description>22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (22q11.2DS) is the strongest known molecular risk factor for schizophrenia. Brain responses to auditory stimuli have been studied extensively in schizophrenia and described as potential biomarkers of vulnerability to psychosis. We sought to understand whether these responses might aid in differentiating individuals with 22q11.2DS as a function of psychotic symptoms, and ultimately serve as signals of risk for schizophrenia. A duration oddball paradigm and high-density electrophysiology were used to test auditory processing in 26 individuals with 22q11.2DS (13–35 years old, 17 females) with varying degrees of psychotic symptomatology and in 26 age- and sex-matched neurotypical controls (NT). Presentation rate varied across three levels, to examine the effect of increasing demands on memory and the integrity of sensory adaptation. We tested whether N1 and mismatch negativity (MMN), typically reduced in schizophrenia, related to clinical/cognitive measures, and how they were affected by presentation rate. N1 adaptation effects interacted with psychotic symptomatology: Compared to an NT group, individuals with 22q11.2DS but no psychotic symptomatology presented larger adaptation effects, whereas those with psychotic symptomatology presented smaller effects. In contrast, individuals with 22q11.2DS showed increased effects of presentation rate on MMN amplitude, regardless of the presence of symptoms. While IQ and working memory were lower in the 22q11.2DS group, these measures did not correlate with the electrophysiological data. These findings suggest the presence of two distinct mechanisms: One intrinsic to 22q11.2DS resulting in increased N1 and MMN responses; another related to psychosis leading to a decreased N1 response.</description><subject>631/378</subject><subject>692/53</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biological Psychology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Pharmacotherapy</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><issn>2158-3188</issn><issn>2158-3188</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1r3DAQhk1paEKaH9BLMfTSi1ONPiz5UgihXxDoIe1ZaKXxroJXciQ77fbXV4u3aVpIhEAf88yrGfRW1Ssg50CYepc5sE41hJKGyJY37Fl1QkGohoFSzx_sj6uznG9IGYIrkPCiOma05LYdPal-XuSMOfuwrs3s_BTTrh5TtIc7DC6OGwxx2o2Ya5NztN5M6OofftrU13bjfxUgYfCm9qFM5--8m82QF4LSW4BzWjsccPIx1HkXXIpbfFkd9YXCs8N6Wn3_-OHb5efm6uunL5cXV43lnZqaleLdqseWKpTgLO-J6kE4uuJgRceJsqTjYHpBUAjalyNj1jInoJVMMMZOq_eL7jivtugshimZQY_Jb03a6Wi8_jcS_Eav452WRCho9wJvDwIp3s6YJ7312eIwmIBxzpoyyVkLFGRB3_yH3sQ5hdKeplxJKhQR5EmKSVBAVdcWChbKpphzwv6-ZCB6bwC9GEAXA-i9AfS-1NcPe73P-PPdBaALkEsorDH9ffpx1d9XMbyB</recordid><startdate>20200305</startdate><enddate>20200305</enddate><creator>Francisco, Ana A.</creator><creator>Foxe, John J.</creator><creator>Horsthuis, Douwe J.</creator><creator>DeMaio, Danielle</creator><creator>Molholm, Sophie</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4030-0297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4300-3098</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200305</creationdate><title>Assessing auditory processing endophenotypes associated with Schizophrenia in individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome</title><author>Francisco, Ana A. ; Foxe, John J. ; Horsthuis, Douwe J. ; DeMaio, Danielle ; Molholm, Sophie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-b849bfe628e71dc4f08f15d2b41c59408c0941af50e552f8c033cc3d516735333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>631/378</topic><topic>692/53</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biological Psychology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Pharmacotherapy</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Francisco, Ana A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foxe, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horsthuis, Douwe J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMaio, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molholm, Sophie</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Translational psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Francisco, Ana A.</au><au>Foxe, John J.</au><au>Horsthuis, Douwe J.</au><au>DeMaio, Danielle</au><au>Molholm, Sophie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing auditory processing endophenotypes associated with Schizophrenia in individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome</atitle><jtitle>Translational psychiatry</jtitle><stitle>Transl Psychiatry</stitle><addtitle>Transl Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2020-03-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>85-85</pages><artnum>85</artnum><issn>2158-3188</issn><eissn>2158-3188</eissn><abstract>22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (22q11.2DS) is the strongest known molecular risk factor for schizophrenia. Brain responses to auditory stimuli have been studied extensively in schizophrenia and described as potential biomarkers of vulnerability to psychosis. We sought to understand whether these responses might aid in differentiating individuals with 22q11.2DS as a function of psychotic symptoms, and ultimately serve as signals of risk for schizophrenia. A duration oddball paradigm and high-density electrophysiology were used to test auditory processing in 26 individuals with 22q11.2DS (13–35 years old, 17 females) with varying degrees of psychotic symptomatology and in 26 age- and sex-matched neurotypical controls (NT). Presentation rate varied across three levels, to examine the effect of increasing demands on memory and the integrity of sensory adaptation. We tested whether N1 and mismatch negativity (MMN), typically reduced in schizophrenia, related to clinical/cognitive measures, and how they were affected by presentation rate. N1 adaptation effects interacted with psychotic symptomatology: Compared to an NT group, individuals with 22q11.2DS but no psychotic symptomatology presented larger adaptation effects, whereas those with psychotic symptomatology presented smaller effects. In contrast, individuals with 22q11.2DS showed increased effects of presentation rate on MMN amplitude, regardless of the presence of symptoms. While IQ and working memory were lower in the 22q11.2DS group, these measures did not correlate with the electrophysiological data. These findings suggest the presence of two distinct mechanisms: One intrinsic to 22q11.2DS resulting in increased N1 and MMN responses; another related to psychosis leading to a decreased N1 response.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>32139692</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41398-020-0764-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4030-0297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4300-3098</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2158-3188
ispartof Translational psychiatry, 2020-03, Vol.10 (1), p.85-85, Article 85
issn 2158-3188
2158-3188
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7058163
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Nature Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects 631/378
692/53
Behavioral Sciences
Biological Psychology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neurosciences
Pharmacotherapy
Psychiatry
Psychosis
Schizophrenia
title Assessing auditory processing endophenotypes associated with Schizophrenia in individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A33%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20auditory%20processing%20endophenotypes%20associated%20with%20Schizophrenia%20in%20individuals%20with%2022q11.2%20deletion%20syndrome&rft.jtitle=Translational%20psychiatry&rft.au=Francisco,%20Ana%20A.&rft.date=2020-03-05&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=85-85&rft.artnum=85&rft.issn=2158-3188&rft.eissn=2158-3188&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41398-020-0764-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2374361217%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2371812896&rft_id=info:pmid/32139692&rfr_iscdi=true