Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria
Purpose Gamete donors and recipients of such donations have been explored by previous studies, which mostly focus on post-donation scenarios. Our study analyses the general willingness to donate oocytes or sperm and focuses on differences between potential female and male donors in attitudes, meanin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2020-02, Vol.37 (2), p.287-296 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 296 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 287 |
container_title | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Flatscher-Thöni, M. Böttcher, B. Geser, W. Lampe, A. Werner-Felmayer, G. Voithofer, C. Schusterschitz, C. |
description | Purpose
Gamete donors and recipients of such donations have been explored by previous studies, which mostly focus on post-donation scenarios. Our study analyses the general willingness to donate oocytes or sperm and focuses on differences between potential female and male donors in attitudes, meanings, and motives in a pre-donation setting.
Methods
An electronic survey (
n
= 555 students) was used in this anonymous observational study. To enable comparisons between men and women regarding their attitudes, meanings, and motives and their willingness to donate gametes, we designed two separate questionnaires.
Results
The sample was divided into three groups based on the willingness to donate: potential donors (
n
= 133; women: 48.1%, men: 51.9%); doubtful donors (
n
= 207; women: 75.8%, men: 24.2%); and non-donors (
n
= 215; women: 68.3%, men: 31.7%). The group of potential male donors (39.2%) was significantly larger than the group of potential female donors (16.9%). Significant differences regarding altruism, the meaning of one’s self-worth, and passing on the own genes were found between doubtful and potential donors. Potential donors attached less value to altruism but more value to the enhancement of one’s self-worth and passing on one’s genes than doubtful donors. The motive of passing on one’s genes and altruistic motives were more important to men than to women.
Conclusion
This study helps to create a better understanding of potential donors in the existing donation framework and supports the evaluation of the given regimes in the context of designing an improved framework. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10815-019-01683-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7056682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2335171281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-de073a45c618548e257cf4fb3e4198904afdc1ac8a618d00ab540c039a93f6f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS1ERcuFF2CBLLFhQco4jmNnQ3VV8SdV6gbE0prrOLeuEjvYTlElHh63KQW6YGF5pPPN-IwPIS8YHDMA-TYxUExUwLpyWsUr9YgcMSF5JTmHx6UGoSpoWnVInqZ0CQCdqvkTcshZx1qQ8oj8_Bbi2CeKM8ZMQ6T5R6DJ9TbRMNB8YWnCyVITnD-h25xdXor2hk4WvfP7UqHv6RSyu1pb5pCtzw5HGoK5zvZWT7ONE-2DDzFR5-l2STk6fEYOBhyTfX53b8jXD--_nH6qzs4_fj7dnlWmkU2ueguSYyNMy5RolK2FNEMz7LhtWKc6aHDoDUOjsAA9AO5EAwZ4hx0f2oHzDXm3zp2X3WR7UwxGHPUc3YTxWgd0-l_Fuwu9D1dagmjb8mUb8vpuQAzfF5uynlwydhzR27AkXXMumGS1YgV99QC9DEv0Zb1CSVYM16AKVa-UiSGlaId7Mwz0Tbh6DVeXcPVtuPqm6eXfa9y3_E6zAHwFUpH83sY_b_9n7C_6o7Ew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2371198208</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Flatscher-Thöni, M. ; Böttcher, B. ; Geser, W. ; Lampe, A. ; Werner-Felmayer, G. ; Voithofer, C. ; Schusterschitz, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Flatscher-Thöni, M. ; Böttcher, B. ; Geser, W. ; Lampe, A. ; Werner-Felmayer, G. ; Voithofer, C. ; Schusterschitz, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Gamete donors and recipients of such donations have been explored by previous studies, which mostly focus on post-donation scenarios. Our study analyses the general willingness to donate oocytes or sperm and focuses on differences between potential female and male donors in attitudes, meanings, and motives in a pre-donation setting.
Methods
An electronic survey (
n
= 555 students) was used in this anonymous observational study. To enable comparisons between men and women regarding their attitudes, meanings, and motives and their willingness to donate gametes, we designed two separate questionnaires.
Results
The sample was divided into three groups based on the willingness to donate: potential donors (
n
= 133; women: 48.1%, men: 51.9%); doubtful donors (
n
= 207; women: 75.8%, men: 24.2%); and non-donors (
n
= 215; women: 68.3%, men: 31.7%). The group of potential male donors (39.2%) was significantly larger than the group of potential female donors (16.9%). Significant differences regarding altruism, the meaning of one’s self-worth, and passing on the own genes were found between doubtful and potential donors. Potential donors attached less value to altruism but more value to the enhancement of one’s self-worth and passing on one’s genes than doubtful donors. The motive of passing on one’s genes and altruistic motives were more important to men than to women.
Conclusion
This study helps to create a better understanding of potential donors in the existing donation framework and supports the evaluation of the given regimes in the context of designing an improved framework.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01683-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31916077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Altruism ; Assisted Reproduction Technologies ; Attitude ; Austria - epidemiology ; Donations ; Female ; Gametes ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Oocyte Donation - ethics ; Oocyte Donation - trends ; Oocytes ; Oocytes - growth & development ; Reproductive Medicine ; Sperm ; Spermatozoa - growth & development ; Tissue and Organ Procurement - trends ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020-02, Vol.37 (2), p.287-296</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-de073a45c618548e257cf4fb3e4198904afdc1ac8a618d00ab540c039a93f6f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-de073a45c618548e257cf4fb3e4198904afdc1ac8a618d00ab540c039a93f6f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7745-9130</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7056682/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7056682/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31916077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flatscher-Thöni, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böttcher, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geser, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lampe, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner-Felmayer, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voithofer, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schusterschitz, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria</title><title>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</title><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><description>Purpose
Gamete donors and recipients of such donations have been explored by previous studies, which mostly focus on post-donation scenarios. Our study analyses the general willingness to donate oocytes or sperm and focuses on differences between potential female and male donors in attitudes, meanings, and motives in a pre-donation setting.
Methods
An electronic survey (
n
= 555 students) was used in this anonymous observational study. To enable comparisons between men and women regarding their attitudes, meanings, and motives and their willingness to donate gametes, we designed two separate questionnaires.
Results
The sample was divided into three groups based on the willingness to donate: potential donors (
n
= 133; women: 48.1%, men: 51.9%); doubtful donors (
n
= 207; women: 75.8%, men: 24.2%); and non-donors (
n
= 215; women: 68.3%, men: 31.7%). The group of potential male donors (39.2%) was significantly larger than the group of potential female donors (16.9%). Significant differences regarding altruism, the meaning of one’s self-worth, and passing on the own genes were found between doubtful and potential donors. Potential donors attached less value to altruism but more value to the enhancement of one’s self-worth and passing on one’s genes than doubtful donors. The motive of passing on one’s genes and altruistic motives were more important to men than to women.
Conclusion
This study helps to create a better understanding of potential donors in the existing donation framework and supports the evaluation of the given regimes in the context of designing an improved framework.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Assisted Reproduction Technologies</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Austria - epidemiology</subject><subject>Donations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gametes</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Oocyte Donation - ethics</subject><subject>Oocyte Donation - trends</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Oocytes - growth & development</subject><subject>Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Sperm</subject><subject>Spermatozoa - growth & development</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Procurement - trends</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1058-0468</issn><issn>1573-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS1ERcuFF2CBLLFhQco4jmNnQ3VV8SdV6gbE0prrOLeuEjvYTlElHh63KQW6YGF5pPPN-IwPIS8YHDMA-TYxUExUwLpyWsUr9YgcMSF5JTmHx6UGoSpoWnVInqZ0CQCdqvkTcshZx1qQ8oj8_Bbi2CeKM8ZMQ6T5R6DJ9TbRMNB8YWnCyVITnD-h25xdXor2hk4WvfP7UqHv6RSyu1pb5pCtzw5HGoK5zvZWT7ONE-2DDzFR5-l2STk6fEYOBhyTfX53b8jXD--_nH6qzs4_fj7dnlWmkU2ueguSYyNMy5RolK2FNEMz7LhtWKc6aHDoDUOjsAA9AO5EAwZ4hx0f2oHzDXm3zp2X3WR7UwxGHPUc3YTxWgd0-l_Fuwu9D1dagmjb8mUb8vpuQAzfF5uynlwydhzR27AkXXMumGS1YgV99QC9DEv0Zb1CSVYM16AKVa-UiSGlaId7Mwz0Tbh6DVeXcPVtuPqm6eXfa9y3_E6zAHwFUpH83sY_b_9n7C_6o7Ew</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Flatscher-Thöni, M.</creator><creator>Böttcher, B.</creator><creator>Geser, W.</creator><creator>Lampe, A.</creator><creator>Werner-Felmayer, G.</creator><creator>Voithofer, C.</creator><creator>Schusterschitz, C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7745-9130</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria</title><author>Flatscher-Thöni, M. ; Böttcher, B. ; Geser, W. ; Lampe, A. ; Werner-Felmayer, G. ; Voithofer, C. ; Schusterschitz, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-de073a45c618548e257cf4fb3e4198904afdc1ac8a618d00ab540c039a93f6f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Assisted Reproduction Technologies</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Austria - epidemiology</topic><topic>Donations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gametes</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Oocyte Donation - ethics</topic><topic>Oocyte Donation - trends</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Oocytes - growth & development</topic><topic>Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Sperm</topic><topic>Spermatozoa - growth & development</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Procurement - trends</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flatscher-Thöni, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böttcher, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geser, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lampe, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner-Felmayer, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voithofer, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schusterschitz, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flatscher-Thöni, M.</au><au>Böttcher, B.</au><au>Geser, W.</au><au>Lampe, A.</au><au>Werner-Felmayer, G.</au><au>Voithofer, C.</au><au>Schusterschitz, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle><stitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</stitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>287-296</pages><issn>1058-0468</issn><eissn>1573-7330</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Gamete donors and recipients of such donations have been explored by previous studies, which mostly focus on post-donation scenarios. Our study analyses the general willingness to donate oocytes or sperm and focuses on differences between potential female and male donors in attitudes, meanings, and motives in a pre-donation setting.
Methods
An electronic survey (
n
= 555 students) was used in this anonymous observational study. To enable comparisons between men and women regarding their attitudes, meanings, and motives and their willingness to donate gametes, we designed two separate questionnaires.
Results
The sample was divided into three groups based on the willingness to donate: potential donors (
n
= 133; women: 48.1%, men: 51.9%); doubtful donors (
n
= 207; women: 75.8%, men: 24.2%); and non-donors (
n
= 215; women: 68.3%, men: 31.7%). The group of potential male donors (39.2%) was significantly larger than the group of potential female donors (16.9%). Significant differences regarding altruism, the meaning of one’s self-worth, and passing on the own genes were found between doubtful and potential donors. Potential donors attached less value to altruism but more value to the enhancement of one’s self-worth and passing on one’s genes than doubtful donors. The motive of passing on one’s genes and altruistic motives were more important to men than to women.
Conclusion
This study helps to create a better understanding of potential donors in the existing donation framework and supports the evaluation of the given regimes in the context of designing an improved framework.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31916077</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10815-019-01683-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7745-9130</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-0468 |
ispartof | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020-02, Vol.37 (2), p.287-296 |
issn | 1058-0468 1573-7330 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7056682 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Altruism Assisted Reproduction Technologies Attitude Austria - epidemiology Donations Female Gametes Gynecology Human Genetics Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Oocyte Donation - ethics Oocyte Donation - trends Oocytes Oocytes - growth & development Reproductive Medicine Sperm Spermatozoa - growth & development Tissue and Organ Procurement - trends Women |
title | Worlds apart or two sides of the same coin? Attitudes, meanings, and motives of potential oocyte and sperm donors in Austria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T13%3A38%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Worlds%20apart%20or%20two%20sides%20of%20the%20same%20coin?%20Attitudes,%20meanings,%20and%20motives%20of%20potential%20oocyte%20and%20sperm%20donors%20in%20Austria&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assisted%20reproduction%20and%20genetics&rft.au=Flatscher-Th%C3%B6ni,%20M.&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=287-296&rft.issn=1058-0468&rft.eissn=1573-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10815-019-01683-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2335171281%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2371198208&rft_id=info:pmid/31916077&rfr_iscdi=true |