Risk factors associated with microembolization after carotid intervention

AbstractBackgroundMicroembolization after carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been documented and may confer risk for neurocognitive impairment. Patients undergoing stenting are known to be at higher risk for microembolization. In this prospective cohort study, we comp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vascular surgery 2020-05, Vol.71 (5), p.1572-1578
Hauptverfasser: Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD, Bock, Diane, BS, Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD, Tan, Tze-Woei, MD, Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD, Trouard, Theodore, PhD, Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD, Zhou, Wei, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1578
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1572
container_title Journal of vascular surgery
container_volume 71
creator Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD
Bock, Diane, BS
Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD
Tan, Tze-Woei, MD
Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD
Trouard, Theodore, PhD
Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD
Zhou, Wei, MD
description AbstractBackgroundMicroembolization after carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been documented and may confer risk for neurocognitive impairment. Patients undergoing stenting are known to be at higher risk for microembolization. In this prospective cohort study, we compare the microembolization rates for patients undergoing CAS and CEA and perioperative characteristics that may be associated with microembolization. MethodsPatients undergoing CAS and CEA were prospectively recruited under local institutional review board approval from an academic medical center. All patients also received 3T brain magnetic resonance imaging with a diffusion-weighted imaging sequence preoperatively and within 24 hours postoperatively to identify procedure-related new embolic lesions. Preoperative, postoperative, procedural factors, and plaque characteristics were collected. Factors were tested for statistical significance with logistic regression. ResultsA total of 202 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 107 patients who underwent CAS and 95 underwent CEA. Patients undergoing CAS were more likely to have microemboli than patients undergoing CEA (78% vs 27%; P < .0001). For patients undergoing CAS, patency of the external carotid artery (odds ratio [OR], 11.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-117.6; P = .04), lesion calcification (OR, 5.68; 95% CI, 1.12-28.79; P = .04), and lesion length (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.08-1.01; P = .05) were all found to be independent risk factors for perioperative embolization. These factors did not confer increased risk to patients undergoing CEA. ConclusionsPatients undergoing CAS are at higher risk for perioperative embolization. The risk for perioperative embolization is related to the length of the lesion and calcification. Identifying the preoperative risk factors may help to guide patient selection and, thereby, reduce embolization-related neurocognitive impairment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.202
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7054135</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0741521419317987</els_id><sourcerecordid>2287513649</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-dc342c9fcba0096835ea190b06b7c2c4d6922740a04b635d2ed13ac0d988bdf43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAUtBCIbhd-ABeUI5csz3Zix0KqhCoolSoh8XG2HPuFOk3iYnsXlV-Poy0VcOA0st7MPGvmEfKCwo4CFa_H3XhIOwZU7UAUZI_IhoKStehAPSYbkA2tW0abE3Ka0ghAadvJp-SE00ZxJeSGXH7y6aYajM0hpsqkFKw3GV31w-fravY2Bpz7MPmfJvuwVGbIGCtrYsjeVX4prwMu6-gZeTKYKeHze9ySr-_ffTn_UF99vLg8f3tV2xZErp3lDbNqsL0BUKLjLRqqoAfRS8ts44RiTDZgoOkFbx1DR7mx4FTX9W5o-JacHX1v9_2Mzpbt0Uz6NvrZxDsdjNd_TxZ_rb-Fg5bQNpS3xeDVvUEM3_eYsp59sjhNZsGwT5qxTraUixLRltAjtcSQUsThYQ0FvVagR10q0GsFGkRBVjQv__zfg-J35oXw5kjAktLBY9TJelwsOh_RZu2C_6_92T9qO_nFWzPd4B2mMezjUuLXVCemQX9eb2A9Aao4laqT_Bdqm65s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287513649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk factors associated with microembolization after carotid intervention</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD ; Bock, Diane, BS ; Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD ; Tan, Tze-Woei, MD ; Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD ; Trouard, Theodore, PhD ; Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD ; Zhou, Wei, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD ; Bock, Diane, BS ; Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD ; Tan, Tze-Woei, MD ; Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD ; Trouard, Theodore, PhD ; Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD ; Zhou, Wei, MD</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractBackgroundMicroembolization after carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been documented and may confer risk for neurocognitive impairment. Patients undergoing stenting are known to be at higher risk for microembolization. In this prospective cohort study, we compare the microembolization rates for patients undergoing CAS and CEA and perioperative characteristics that may be associated with microembolization. MethodsPatients undergoing CAS and CEA were prospectively recruited under local institutional review board approval from an academic medical center. All patients also received 3T brain magnetic resonance imaging with a diffusion-weighted imaging sequence preoperatively and within 24 hours postoperatively to identify procedure-related new embolic lesions. Preoperative, postoperative, procedural factors, and plaque characteristics were collected. Factors were tested for statistical significance with logistic regression. ResultsA total of 202 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 107 patients who underwent CAS and 95 underwent CEA. Patients undergoing CAS were more likely to have microemboli than patients undergoing CEA (78% vs 27%; P &lt; .0001). For patients undergoing CAS, patency of the external carotid artery (odds ratio [OR], 11.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-117.6; P = .04), lesion calcification (OR, 5.68; 95% CI, 1.12-28.79; P = .04), and lesion length (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.08-1.01; P = .05) were all found to be independent risk factors for perioperative embolization. These factors did not confer increased risk to patients undergoing CEA. ConclusionsPatients undergoing CAS are at higher risk for perioperative embolization. The risk for perioperative embolization is related to the length of the lesion and calcification. Identifying the preoperative risk factors may help to guide patient selection and, thereby, reduce embolization-related neurocognitive impairment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.202</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31493967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Carotid artery disease ; Carotid artery stenting ; Carotid endarterectomy ; Carotid Stenosis - complications ; Carotid Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Carotid Stenosis - therapy ; Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation ; Female ; Humans ; Intracranial Embolism - diagnostic imaging ; Intracranial Embolism - etiology ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Microembolization ; Microinfarction ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Stents ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2020-05, Vol.71 (5), p.1572-1578</ispartof><rights>Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2019 Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-dc342c9fcba0096835ea190b06b7c2c4d6922740a04b635d2ed13ac0d988bdf43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-dc342c9fcba0096835ea190b06b7c2c4d6922740a04b635d2ed13ac0d988bdf43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521419317987$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31493967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bock, Diane, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Tze-Woei, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trouard, Theodore, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Wei, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Risk factors associated with microembolization after carotid intervention</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>AbstractBackgroundMicroembolization after carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been documented and may confer risk for neurocognitive impairment. Patients undergoing stenting are known to be at higher risk for microembolization. In this prospective cohort study, we compare the microembolization rates for patients undergoing CAS and CEA and perioperative characteristics that may be associated with microembolization. MethodsPatients undergoing CAS and CEA were prospectively recruited under local institutional review board approval from an academic medical center. All patients also received 3T brain magnetic resonance imaging with a diffusion-weighted imaging sequence preoperatively and within 24 hours postoperatively to identify procedure-related new embolic lesions. Preoperative, postoperative, procedural factors, and plaque characteristics were collected. Factors were tested for statistical significance with logistic regression. ResultsA total of 202 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 107 patients who underwent CAS and 95 underwent CEA. Patients undergoing CAS were more likely to have microemboli than patients undergoing CEA (78% vs 27%; P &lt; .0001). For patients undergoing CAS, patency of the external carotid artery (odds ratio [OR], 11.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-117.6; P = .04), lesion calcification (OR, 5.68; 95% CI, 1.12-28.79; P = .04), and lesion length (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.08-1.01; P = .05) were all found to be independent risk factors for perioperative embolization. These factors did not confer increased risk to patients undergoing CEA. ConclusionsPatients undergoing CAS are at higher risk for perioperative embolization. The risk for perioperative embolization is related to the length of the lesion and calcification. Identifying the preoperative risk factors may help to guide patient selection and, thereby, reduce embolization-related neurocognitive impairment.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carotid artery disease</subject><subject>Carotid artery stenting</subject><subject>Carotid endarterectomy</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - complications</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - therapy</subject><subject>Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intracranial Embolism - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Intracranial Embolism - etiology</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microembolization</subject><subject>Microinfarction</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAUtBCIbhd-ABeUI5csz3Zix0KqhCoolSoh8XG2HPuFOk3iYnsXlV-Poy0VcOA0st7MPGvmEfKCwo4CFa_H3XhIOwZU7UAUZI_IhoKStehAPSYbkA2tW0abE3Ka0ghAadvJp-SE00ZxJeSGXH7y6aYajM0hpsqkFKw3GV31w-fravY2Bpz7MPmfJvuwVGbIGCtrYsjeVX4prwMu6-gZeTKYKeHze9ySr-_ffTn_UF99vLg8f3tV2xZErp3lDbNqsL0BUKLjLRqqoAfRS8ts44RiTDZgoOkFbx1DR7mx4FTX9W5o-JacHX1v9_2Mzpbt0Uz6NvrZxDsdjNd_TxZ_rb-Fg5bQNpS3xeDVvUEM3_eYsp59sjhNZsGwT5qxTraUixLRltAjtcSQUsThYQ0FvVagR10q0GsFGkRBVjQv__zfg-J35oXw5kjAktLBY9TJelwsOh_RZu2C_6_92T9qO_nFWzPd4B2mMezjUuLXVCemQX9eb2A9Aao4laqT_Bdqm65s</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Bock, Diane, BS</creator><creator>Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD</creator><creator>Tan, Tze-Woei, MD</creator><creator>Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Trouard, Theodore, PhD</creator><creator>Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD</creator><creator>Zhou, Wei, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Risk factors associated with microembolization after carotid intervention</title><author>Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD ; Bock, Diane, BS ; Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD ; Tan, Tze-Woei, MD ; Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD ; Trouard, Theodore, PhD ; Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD ; Zhou, Wei, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-dc342c9fcba0096835ea190b06b7c2c4d6922740a04b635d2ed13ac0d988bdf43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carotid artery disease</topic><topic>Carotid artery stenting</topic><topic>Carotid endarterectomy</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - complications</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - therapy</topic><topic>Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intracranial Embolism - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Intracranial Embolism - etiology</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microembolization</topic><topic>Microinfarction</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bock, Diane, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Tze-Woei, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trouard, Theodore, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Wei, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD</au><au>Bock, Diane, BS</au><au>Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD</au><au>Tan, Tze-Woei, MD</au><au>Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD</au><au>Trouard, Theodore, PhD</au><au>Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD</au><au>Zhou, Wei, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk factors associated with microembolization after carotid intervention</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1572</spage><epage>1578</epage><pages>1572-1578</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>AbstractBackgroundMicroembolization after carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been documented and may confer risk for neurocognitive impairment. Patients undergoing stenting are known to be at higher risk for microembolization. In this prospective cohort study, we compare the microembolization rates for patients undergoing CAS and CEA and perioperative characteristics that may be associated with microembolization. MethodsPatients undergoing CAS and CEA were prospectively recruited under local institutional review board approval from an academic medical center. All patients also received 3T brain magnetic resonance imaging with a diffusion-weighted imaging sequence preoperatively and within 24 hours postoperatively to identify procedure-related new embolic lesions. Preoperative, postoperative, procedural factors, and plaque characteristics were collected. Factors were tested for statistical significance with logistic regression. ResultsA total of 202 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 107 patients who underwent CAS and 95 underwent CEA. Patients undergoing CAS were more likely to have microemboli than patients undergoing CEA (78% vs 27%; P &lt; .0001). For patients undergoing CAS, patency of the external carotid artery (odds ratio [OR], 11.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-117.6; P = .04), lesion calcification (OR, 5.68; 95% CI, 1.12-28.79; P = .04), and lesion length (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.08-1.01; P = .05) were all found to be independent risk factors for perioperative embolization. These factors did not confer increased risk to patients undergoing CEA. ConclusionsPatients undergoing CAS are at higher risk for perioperative embolization. The risk for perioperative embolization is related to the length of the lesion and calcification. Identifying the preoperative risk factors may help to guide patient selection and, thereby, reduce embolization-related neurocognitive impairment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31493967</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.202</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-5214
ispartof Journal of vascular surgery, 2020-05, Vol.71 (5), p.1572-1578
issn 0741-5214
1097-6809
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7054135
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Aged
Carotid artery disease
Carotid artery stenting
Carotid endarterectomy
Carotid Stenosis - complications
Carotid Stenosis - diagnostic imaging
Carotid Stenosis - therapy
Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation
Female
Humans
Intracranial Embolism - diagnostic imaging
Intracranial Embolism - etiology
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Microembolization
Microinfarction
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Stents
Surgery
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Risk factors associated with microembolization after carotid intervention
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A53%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20factors%20associated%20with%20microembolization%20after%20carotid%20intervention&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Sabat,%20Joseph,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1572&rft.epage=1578&rft.pages=1572-1578&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2287513649%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287513649&rft_id=info:pmid/31493967&rft_els_id=S0741521419317987&rfr_iscdi=true