Risk factors associated with microembolization after carotid intervention
AbstractBackgroundMicroembolization after carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been documented and may confer risk for neurocognitive impairment. Patients undergoing stenting are known to be at higher risk for microembolization. In this prospective cohort study, we comp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vascular surgery 2020-05, Vol.71 (5), p.1572-1578 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1578 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1572 |
container_title | Journal of vascular surgery |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD Bock, Diane, BS Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD Tan, Tze-Woei, MD Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD Trouard, Theodore, PhD Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD Zhou, Wei, MD |
description | AbstractBackgroundMicroembolization after carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been documented and may confer risk for neurocognitive impairment. Patients undergoing stenting are known to be at higher risk for microembolization. In this prospective cohort study, we compare the microembolization rates for patients undergoing CAS and CEA and perioperative characteristics that may be associated with microembolization. MethodsPatients undergoing CAS and CEA were prospectively recruited under local institutional review board approval from an academic medical center. All patients also received 3T brain magnetic resonance imaging with a diffusion-weighted imaging sequence preoperatively and within 24 hours postoperatively to identify procedure-related new embolic lesions. Preoperative, postoperative, procedural factors, and plaque characteristics were collected. Factors were tested for statistical significance with logistic regression. ResultsA total of 202 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 107 patients who underwent CAS and 95 underwent CEA. Patients undergoing CAS were more likely to have microemboli than patients undergoing CEA (78% vs 27%; P < .0001). For patients undergoing CAS, patency of the external carotid artery (odds ratio [OR], 11.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-117.6; P = .04), lesion calcification (OR, 5.68; 95% CI, 1.12-28.79; P = .04), and lesion length (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.08-1.01; P = .05) were all found to be independent risk factors for perioperative embolization. These factors did not confer increased risk to patients undergoing CEA. ConclusionsPatients undergoing CAS are at higher risk for perioperative embolization. The risk for perioperative embolization is related to the length of the lesion and calcification. Identifying the preoperative risk factors may help to guide patient selection and, thereby, reduce embolization-related neurocognitive impairment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.202 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7054135</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0741521419317987</els_id><sourcerecordid>2287513649</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-dc342c9fcba0096835ea190b06b7c2c4d6922740a04b635d2ed13ac0d988bdf43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAUtBCIbhd-ABeUI5csz3Zix0KqhCoolSoh8XG2HPuFOk3iYnsXlV-Poy0VcOA0st7MPGvmEfKCwo4CFa_H3XhIOwZU7UAUZI_IhoKStehAPSYbkA2tW0abE3Ka0ghAadvJp-SE00ZxJeSGXH7y6aYajM0hpsqkFKw3GV31w-fravY2Bpz7MPmfJvuwVGbIGCtrYsjeVX4prwMu6-gZeTKYKeHze9ySr-_ffTn_UF99vLg8f3tV2xZErp3lDbNqsL0BUKLjLRqqoAfRS8ts44RiTDZgoOkFbx1DR7mx4FTX9W5o-JacHX1v9_2Mzpbt0Uz6NvrZxDsdjNd_TxZ_rb-Fg5bQNpS3xeDVvUEM3_eYsp59sjhNZsGwT5qxTraUixLRltAjtcSQUsThYQ0FvVagR10q0GsFGkRBVjQv__zfg-J35oXw5kjAktLBY9TJelwsOh_RZu2C_6_92T9qO_nFWzPd4B2mMezjUuLXVCemQX9eb2A9Aao4laqT_Bdqm65s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2287513649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk factors associated with microembolization after carotid intervention</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD ; Bock, Diane, BS ; Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD ; Tan, Tze-Woei, MD ; Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD ; Trouard, Theodore, PhD ; Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD ; Zhou, Wei, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD ; Bock, Diane, BS ; Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD ; Tan, Tze-Woei, MD ; Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD ; Trouard, Theodore, PhD ; Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD ; Zhou, Wei, MD</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractBackgroundMicroembolization after carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been documented and may confer risk for neurocognitive impairment. Patients undergoing stenting are known to be at higher risk for microembolization. In this prospective cohort study, we compare the microembolization rates for patients undergoing CAS and CEA and perioperative characteristics that may be associated with microembolization. MethodsPatients undergoing CAS and CEA were prospectively recruited under local institutional review board approval from an academic medical center. All patients also received 3T brain magnetic resonance imaging with a diffusion-weighted imaging sequence preoperatively and within 24 hours postoperatively to identify procedure-related new embolic lesions. Preoperative, postoperative, procedural factors, and plaque characteristics were collected. Factors were tested for statistical significance with logistic regression. ResultsA total of 202 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 107 patients who underwent CAS and 95 underwent CEA. Patients undergoing CAS were more likely to have microemboli than patients undergoing CEA (78% vs 27%; P < .0001). For patients undergoing CAS, patency of the external carotid artery (odds ratio [OR], 11.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-117.6; P = .04), lesion calcification (OR, 5.68; 95% CI, 1.12-28.79; P = .04), and lesion length (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.08-1.01; P = .05) were all found to be independent risk factors for perioperative embolization. These factors did not confer increased risk to patients undergoing CEA. ConclusionsPatients undergoing CAS are at higher risk for perioperative embolization. The risk for perioperative embolization is related to the length of the lesion and calcification. Identifying the preoperative risk factors may help to guide patient selection and, thereby, reduce embolization-related neurocognitive impairment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.202</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31493967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Carotid artery disease ; Carotid artery stenting ; Carotid endarterectomy ; Carotid Stenosis - complications ; Carotid Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Carotid Stenosis - therapy ; Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation ; Female ; Humans ; Intracranial Embolism - diagnostic imaging ; Intracranial Embolism - etiology ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Microembolization ; Microinfarction ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Stents ; Surgery ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2020-05, Vol.71 (5), p.1572-1578</ispartof><rights>Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2019 Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-dc342c9fcba0096835ea190b06b7c2c4d6922740a04b635d2ed13ac0d988bdf43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-dc342c9fcba0096835ea190b06b7c2c4d6922740a04b635d2ed13ac0d988bdf43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521419317987$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31493967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bock, Diane, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Tze-Woei, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trouard, Theodore, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Wei, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Risk factors associated with microembolization after carotid intervention</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>AbstractBackgroundMicroembolization after carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been documented and may confer risk for neurocognitive impairment. Patients undergoing stenting are known to be at higher risk for microembolization. In this prospective cohort study, we compare the microembolization rates for patients undergoing CAS and CEA and perioperative characteristics that may be associated with microembolization. MethodsPatients undergoing CAS and CEA were prospectively recruited under local institutional review board approval from an academic medical center. All patients also received 3T brain magnetic resonance imaging with a diffusion-weighted imaging sequence preoperatively and within 24 hours postoperatively to identify procedure-related new embolic lesions. Preoperative, postoperative, procedural factors, and plaque characteristics were collected. Factors were tested for statistical significance with logistic regression. ResultsA total of 202 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 107 patients who underwent CAS and 95 underwent CEA. Patients undergoing CAS were more likely to have microemboli than patients undergoing CEA (78% vs 27%; P < .0001). For patients undergoing CAS, patency of the external carotid artery (odds ratio [OR], 11.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-117.6; P = .04), lesion calcification (OR, 5.68; 95% CI, 1.12-28.79; P = .04), and lesion length (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.08-1.01; P = .05) were all found to be independent risk factors for perioperative embolization. These factors did not confer increased risk to patients undergoing CEA. ConclusionsPatients undergoing CAS are at higher risk for perioperative embolization. The risk for perioperative embolization is related to the length of the lesion and calcification. Identifying the preoperative risk factors may help to guide patient selection and, thereby, reduce embolization-related neurocognitive impairment.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carotid artery disease</subject><subject>Carotid artery stenting</subject><subject>Carotid endarterectomy</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - complications</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - therapy</subject><subject>Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intracranial Embolism - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Intracranial Embolism - etiology</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microembolization</subject><subject>Microinfarction</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAUtBCIbhd-ABeUI5csz3Zix0KqhCoolSoh8XG2HPuFOk3iYnsXlV-Poy0VcOA0st7MPGvmEfKCwo4CFa_H3XhIOwZU7UAUZI_IhoKStehAPSYbkA2tW0abE3Ka0ghAadvJp-SE00ZxJeSGXH7y6aYajM0hpsqkFKw3GV31w-fravY2Bpz7MPmfJvuwVGbIGCtrYsjeVX4prwMu6-gZeTKYKeHze9ySr-_ffTn_UF99vLg8f3tV2xZErp3lDbNqsL0BUKLjLRqqoAfRS8ts44RiTDZgoOkFbx1DR7mx4FTX9W5o-JacHX1v9_2Mzpbt0Uz6NvrZxDsdjNd_TxZ_rb-Fg5bQNpS3xeDVvUEM3_eYsp59sjhNZsGwT5qxTraUixLRltAjtcSQUsThYQ0FvVagR10q0GsFGkRBVjQv__zfg-J35oXw5kjAktLBY9TJelwsOh_RZu2C_6_92T9qO_nFWzPd4B2mMezjUuLXVCemQX9eb2A9Aao4laqT_Bdqm65s</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Bock, Diane, BS</creator><creator>Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD</creator><creator>Tan, Tze-Woei, MD</creator><creator>Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Trouard, Theodore, PhD</creator><creator>Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD</creator><creator>Zhou, Wei, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Risk factors associated with microembolization after carotid intervention</title><author>Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD ; Bock, Diane, BS ; Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD ; Tan, Tze-Woei, MD ; Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD ; Trouard, Theodore, PhD ; Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD ; Zhou, Wei, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-dc342c9fcba0096835ea190b06b7c2c4d6922740a04b635d2ed13ac0d988bdf43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carotid artery disease</topic><topic>Carotid artery stenting</topic><topic>Carotid endarterectomy</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - complications</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - therapy</topic><topic>Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intracranial Embolism - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Intracranial Embolism - etiology</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microembolization</topic><topic>Microinfarction</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bock, Diane, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Tze-Woei, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trouard, Theodore, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Wei, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sabat, Joseph, MD, PhD</au><au>Bock, Diane, BS</au><au>Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, PhD</au><au>Tan, Tze-Woei, MD</au><au>Weinkauf, Craig, MD, PhD</au><au>Trouard, Theodore, PhD</au><au>Perez-Carrillo, Gloria Guzman, MD</au><au>Zhou, Wei, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk factors associated with microembolization after carotid intervention</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1572</spage><epage>1578</epage><pages>1572-1578</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>AbstractBackgroundMicroembolization after carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been documented and may confer risk for neurocognitive impairment. Patients undergoing stenting are known to be at higher risk for microembolization. In this prospective cohort study, we compare the microembolization rates for patients undergoing CAS and CEA and perioperative characteristics that may be associated with microembolization. MethodsPatients undergoing CAS and CEA were prospectively recruited under local institutional review board approval from an academic medical center. All patients also received 3T brain magnetic resonance imaging with a diffusion-weighted imaging sequence preoperatively and within 24 hours postoperatively to identify procedure-related new embolic lesions. Preoperative, postoperative, procedural factors, and plaque characteristics were collected. Factors were tested for statistical significance with logistic regression. ResultsA total of 202 patients were enrolled in the study. There were 107 patients who underwent CAS and 95 underwent CEA. Patients undergoing CAS were more likely to have microemboli than patients undergoing CEA (78% vs 27%; P < .0001). For patients undergoing CAS, patency of the external carotid artery (odds ratio [OR], 11.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-117.6; P = .04), lesion calcification (OR, 5.68; 95% CI, 1.12-28.79; P = .04), and lesion length (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.08-1.01; P = .05) were all found to be independent risk factors for perioperative embolization. These factors did not confer increased risk to patients undergoing CEA. ConclusionsPatients undergoing CAS are at higher risk for perioperative embolization. The risk for perioperative embolization is related to the length of the lesion and calcification. Identifying the preoperative risk factors may help to guide patient selection and, thereby, reduce embolization-related neurocognitive impairment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31493967</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.202</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-5214 |
ispartof | Journal of vascular surgery, 2020-05, Vol.71 (5), p.1572-1578 |
issn | 0741-5214 1097-6809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7054135 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Aged Carotid artery disease Carotid artery stenting Carotid endarterectomy Carotid Stenosis - complications Carotid Stenosis - diagnostic imaging Carotid Stenosis - therapy Endarterectomy, Carotid - adverse effects Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation Female Humans Intracranial Embolism - diagnostic imaging Intracranial Embolism - etiology Longitudinal Studies Male Microembolization Microinfarction Middle Aged Prospective Studies Risk Assessment Risk Factors Stents Surgery Time Factors Treatment Outcome |
title | Risk factors associated with microembolization after carotid intervention |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A53%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20factors%20associated%20with%20microembolization%20after%20carotid%20intervention&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Sabat,%20Joseph,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1572&rft.epage=1578&rft.pages=1572-1578&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.06.202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2287513649%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2287513649&rft_id=info:pmid/31493967&rft_els_id=S0741521419317987&rfr_iscdi=true |