Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial
Direct stenting without pre-dilation or post-dilation has been advocated for saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention to decrease the incidence of distal embolization, periprocedural myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. We performed a post hoc analysis of patien...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions 2020-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e008494-e008494 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e008494 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e008494 |
container_title | Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Latif, Faisal Uyeda, Lauren Edson, Robert Bhatt, Deepak L. Goldman, Steven Holmes, David R. Rao, Sunil V. Shunk, Kendrick Aggarwal, Kul Uretsky, Barry Bolad, Islam Ziada, Khaled McFalls, Edward Irimpen, Anand Truong, Huu Tam Kinlay, Scott Papademetriou, Vasilios Velagaleti, Raghava S. Rangan, Bavana V. Mavromatis, Kreton Shih, Mei-Chiung Banerjee, Subhash Brilakis, Emmanouil S. |
description | Direct stenting without pre-dilation or post-dilation has been advocated for saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention to decrease the incidence of distal embolization, periprocedural myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.
We performed a post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in the DIVA (Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty; NCT01121224) prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients were stratified into stent-only and balloon-stent groups. Primary end point was 12-month incidence of target vessel failure (defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Secondary end points included all-cause death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization during follow-up.
Of the 575 patients included in this substudy, 185 (32%) patients underwent stent-only percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients in the stent-only versus balloon-stent group had similar baseline characteristics and similar incidence of target vessel failure at 12-months (15% versus 19%; hazard ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.86-2.08];
=0.19). During long-term follow-up (median of 2.7 years), the incidence of definite stent thrombosis (1% versus 5%; hazard ratio, 9.20 [95% CI, 1.23-68.92];
=0.0085), the composite of definite or probable stent thrombosis (5% versus 11%; hazard ratio, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.23-5.18];
=0.009), and target vessel myocardial infarction (8% versus 14%; hazard ratio, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.08-3.40];
=0.023) was lower in the stent-only group. Multivariable analysis showed that a higher number of years since coronary artery bypass grafting and >1 target saphenous vein graft lesions were associated with increased target vessel failure during entire follow-up, while preintervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-3 flow was protective.
In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of de novo saphenous vein graft lesions, there was no difference in target vessel failure at 12 months and long-term follow-up in the stent-only versus the balloon-stent group; however, the incidence of stent thrombosis was lower in the stent-only group, as was target vessel myocardial infarction. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01121224. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008494 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7053803</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2351519106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3646-42ec3a838a940878d7c8eb61fdad5cb2ced1c4a847e005bb91dc6435e0c402a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUV1v0zAUtRCIjcJfQH7ggZcMO3a-EEIKoRuRphatpa-W47iNh2tndtKpv4K_jKuMCoRky9fH5957fA8A7zC6wjjFH6r6rqoX6_ndZr5Y18vFKsDFFUI5LegzcIkLiqMsJfHzc0zRBXjl_T1CAU7jl-CCxAgXhJJL8Gs1SDNES6OPcCOdHz0s2_vRiEEdJPzCtbbWwNLslO0198MRln3vLBcd3FoHV7zvpLEhayOVgTeObwf4XToxDtzIE15ZZw13R1ibQbpDaKas-RhuXu26wcNrZ_fwa70p4doprl-DF1uuvXzzdM7Aj-v5uvoW3S5v6qq8jQRJaRrRWArCc5LzgqI8y9tM5LJJ8bblbSKaWMgWC8pzmkmEkqYpcCtSShKJBEUxT8gMfJ7q9mOzl60IuhzXrHdqH8QyyxX798Woju3sgWUoITkiocD7pwLOPozSD2yvvJBaT_9mMUlwggscZj4DnyaqcNZ7J7fnNhixk6fsP08DXLDJ05D-9m-p5-Q_JgYCnQiPVocZ-596fJSOdZLroWMIE5LRIoliFKPTQlHYQdZvvJGzwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2351519106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial</title><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Latif, Faisal ; Uyeda, Lauren ; Edson, Robert ; Bhatt, Deepak L. ; Goldman, Steven ; Holmes, David R. ; Rao, Sunil V. ; Shunk, Kendrick ; Aggarwal, Kul ; Uretsky, Barry ; Bolad, Islam ; Ziada, Khaled ; McFalls, Edward ; Irimpen, Anand ; Truong, Huu Tam ; Kinlay, Scott ; Papademetriou, Vasilios ; Velagaleti, Raghava S. ; Rangan, Bavana V. ; Mavromatis, Kreton ; Shih, Mei-Chiung ; Banerjee, Subhash ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Latif, Faisal ; Uyeda, Lauren ; Edson, Robert ; Bhatt, Deepak L. ; Goldman, Steven ; Holmes, David R. ; Rao, Sunil V. ; Shunk, Kendrick ; Aggarwal, Kul ; Uretsky, Barry ; Bolad, Islam ; Ziada, Khaled ; McFalls, Edward ; Irimpen, Anand ; Truong, Huu Tam ; Kinlay, Scott ; Papademetriou, Vasilios ; Velagaleti, Raghava S. ; Rangan, Bavana V. ; Mavromatis, Kreton ; Shih, Mei-Chiung ; Banerjee, Subhash ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creatorcontrib><description>Direct stenting without pre-dilation or post-dilation has been advocated for saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention to decrease the incidence of distal embolization, periprocedural myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.
We performed a post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in the DIVA (Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty; NCT01121224) prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients were stratified into stent-only and balloon-stent groups. Primary end point was 12-month incidence of target vessel failure (defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Secondary end points included all-cause death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization during follow-up.
Of the 575 patients included in this substudy, 185 (32%) patients underwent stent-only percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients in the stent-only versus balloon-stent group had similar baseline characteristics and similar incidence of target vessel failure at 12-months (15% versus 19%; hazard ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.86-2.08];
=0.19). During long-term follow-up (median of 2.7 years), the incidence of definite stent thrombosis (1% versus 5%; hazard ratio, 9.20 [95% CI, 1.23-68.92];
=0.0085), the composite of definite or probable stent thrombosis (5% versus 11%; hazard ratio, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.23-5.18];
=0.009), and target vessel myocardial infarction (8% versus 14%; hazard ratio, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.08-3.40];
=0.023) was lower in the stent-only group. Multivariable analysis showed that a higher number of years since coronary artery bypass grafting and >1 target saphenous vein graft lesions were associated with increased target vessel failure during entire follow-up, while preintervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-3 flow was protective.
In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of de novo saphenous vein graft lesions, there was no difference in target vessel failure at 12 months and long-term follow-up in the stent-only versus the balloon-stent group; however, the incidence of stent thrombosis was lower in the stent-only group, as was target vessel myocardial infarction. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01121224.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-7640</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-7632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008494</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32019343</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions, 2020-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e008494-e008494</ispartof><rights>American Heart Association, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3646-42ec3a838a940878d7c8eb61fdad5cb2ced1c4a847e005bb91dc6435e0c402a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3686,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32019343$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Latif, Faisal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uyeda, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edson, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatt, Deepak L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Sunil V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shunk, Kendrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Kul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uretsky, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolad, Islam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziada, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFalls, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irimpen, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truong, Huu Tam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinlay, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papademetriou, Vasilios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velagaleti, Raghava S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rangan, Bavana V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavromatis, Kreton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Mei-Chiung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Subhash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creatorcontrib><title>Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial</title><title>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Circ Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><description>Direct stenting without pre-dilation or post-dilation has been advocated for saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention to decrease the incidence of distal embolization, periprocedural myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.
We performed a post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in the DIVA (Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty; NCT01121224) prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients were stratified into stent-only and balloon-stent groups. Primary end point was 12-month incidence of target vessel failure (defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Secondary end points included all-cause death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization during follow-up.
Of the 575 patients included in this substudy, 185 (32%) patients underwent stent-only percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients in the stent-only versus balloon-stent group had similar baseline characteristics and similar incidence of target vessel failure at 12-months (15% versus 19%; hazard ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.86-2.08];
=0.19). During long-term follow-up (median of 2.7 years), the incidence of definite stent thrombosis (1% versus 5%; hazard ratio, 9.20 [95% CI, 1.23-68.92];
=0.0085), the composite of definite or probable stent thrombosis (5% versus 11%; hazard ratio, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.23-5.18];
=0.009), and target vessel myocardial infarction (8% versus 14%; hazard ratio, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.08-3.40];
=0.023) was lower in the stent-only group. Multivariable analysis showed that a higher number of years since coronary artery bypass grafting and >1 target saphenous vein graft lesions were associated with increased target vessel failure during entire follow-up, while preintervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-3 flow was protective.
In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of de novo saphenous vein graft lesions, there was no difference in target vessel failure at 12 months and long-term follow-up in the stent-only versus the balloon-stent group; however, the incidence of stent thrombosis was lower in the stent-only group, as was target vessel myocardial infarction. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01121224.</description><issn>1941-7640</issn><issn>1941-7632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplUV1v0zAUtRCIjcJfQH7ggZcMO3a-EEIKoRuRphatpa-W47iNh2tndtKpv4K_jKuMCoRky9fH5957fA8A7zC6wjjFH6r6rqoX6_ndZr5Y18vFKsDFFUI5LegzcIkLiqMsJfHzc0zRBXjl_T1CAU7jl-CCxAgXhJJL8Gs1SDNES6OPcCOdHz0s2_vRiEEdJPzCtbbWwNLslO0198MRln3vLBcd3FoHV7zvpLEhayOVgTeObwf4XToxDtzIE15ZZw13R1ibQbpDaKas-RhuXu26wcNrZ_fwa70p4doprl-DF1uuvXzzdM7Aj-v5uvoW3S5v6qq8jQRJaRrRWArCc5LzgqI8y9tM5LJJ8bblbSKaWMgWC8pzmkmEkqYpcCtSShKJBEUxT8gMfJ7q9mOzl60IuhzXrHdqH8QyyxX798Woju3sgWUoITkiocD7pwLOPozSD2yvvJBaT_9mMUlwggscZj4DnyaqcNZ7J7fnNhixk6fsP08DXLDJ05D-9m-p5-Q_JgYCnQiPVocZ-596fJSOdZLroWMIE5LRIoliFKPTQlHYQdZvvJGzwA</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Latif, Faisal</creator><creator>Uyeda, Lauren</creator><creator>Edson, Robert</creator><creator>Bhatt, Deepak L.</creator><creator>Goldman, Steven</creator><creator>Holmes, David R.</creator><creator>Rao, Sunil V.</creator><creator>Shunk, Kendrick</creator><creator>Aggarwal, Kul</creator><creator>Uretsky, Barry</creator><creator>Bolad, Islam</creator><creator>Ziada, Khaled</creator><creator>McFalls, Edward</creator><creator>Irimpen, Anand</creator><creator>Truong, Huu Tam</creator><creator>Kinlay, Scott</creator><creator>Papademetriou, Vasilios</creator><creator>Velagaleti, Raghava S.</creator><creator>Rangan, Bavana V.</creator><creator>Mavromatis, Kreton</creator><creator>Shih, Mei-Chiung</creator><creator>Banerjee, Subhash</creator><creator>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creator><general>American Heart Association, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial</title><author>Latif, Faisal ; Uyeda, Lauren ; Edson, Robert ; Bhatt, Deepak L. ; Goldman, Steven ; Holmes, David R. ; Rao, Sunil V. ; Shunk, Kendrick ; Aggarwal, Kul ; Uretsky, Barry ; Bolad, Islam ; Ziada, Khaled ; McFalls, Edward ; Irimpen, Anand ; Truong, Huu Tam ; Kinlay, Scott ; Papademetriou, Vasilios ; Velagaleti, Raghava S. ; Rangan, Bavana V. ; Mavromatis, Kreton ; Shih, Mei-Chiung ; Banerjee, Subhash ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3646-42ec3a838a940878d7c8eb61fdad5cb2ced1c4a847e005bb91dc6435e0c402a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Latif, Faisal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uyeda, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edson, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatt, Deepak L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Sunil V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shunk, Kendrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Kul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uretsky, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolad, Islam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziada, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFalls, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irimpen, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truong, Huu Tam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinlay, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papademetriou, Vasilios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velagaleti, Raghava S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rangan, Bavana V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavromatis, Kreton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Mei-Chiung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Subhash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Latif, Faisal</au><au>Uyeda, Lauren</au><au>Edson, Robert</au><au>Bhatt, Deepak L.</au><au>Goldman, Steven</au><au>Holmes, David R.</au><au>Rao, Sunil V.</au><au>Shunk, Kendrick</au><au>Aggarwal, Kul</au><au>Uretsky, Barry</au><au>Bolad, Islam</au><au>Ziada, Khaled</au><au>McFalls, Edward</au><au>Irimpen, Anand</au><au>Truong, Huu Tam</au><au>Kinlay, Scott</au><au>Papademetriou, Vasilios</au><au>Velagaleti, Raghava S.</au><au>Rangan, Bavana V.</au><au>Mavromatis, Kreton</au><au>Shih, Mei-Chiung</au><au>Banerjee, Subhash</au><au>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial</atitle><jtitle>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Circ Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e008494</spage><epage>e008494</epage><pages>e008494-e008494</pages><issn>1941-7640</issn><eissn>1941-7632</eissn><abstract>Direct stenting without pre-dilation or post-dilation has been advocated for saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention to decrease the incidence of distal embolization, periprocedural myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.
We performed a post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in the DIVA (Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty; NCT01121224) prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients were stratified into stent-only and balloon-stent groups. Primary end point was 12-month incidence of target vessel failure (defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Secondary end points included all-cause death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization during follow-up.
Of the 575 patients included in this substudy, 185 (32%) patients underwent stent-only percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients in the stent-only versus balloon-stent group had similar baseline characteristics and similar incidence of target vessel failure at 12-months (15% versus 19%; hazard ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.86-2.08];
=0.19). During long-term follow-up (median of 2.7 years), the incidence of definite stent thrombosis (1% versus 5%; hazard ratio, 9.20 [95% CI, 1.23-68.92];
=0.0085), the composite of definite or probable stent thrombosis (5% versus 11%; hazard ratio, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.23-5.18];
=0.009), and target vessel myocardial infarction (8% versus 14%; hazard ratio, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.08-3.40];
=0.023) was lower in the stent-only group. Multivariable analysis showed that a higher number of years since coronary artery bypass grafting and >1 target saphenous vein graft lesions were associated with increased target vessel failure during entire follow-up, while preintervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-3 flow was protective.
In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of de novo saphenous vein graft lesions, there was no difference in target vessel failure at 12 months and long-term follow-up in the stent-only versus the balloon-stent group; however, the incidence of stent thrombosis was lower in the stent-only group, as was target vessel myocardial infarction. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01121224.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Heart Association, Inc</pub><pmid>32019343</pmid><doi>10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008494</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1941-7640 |
ispartof | Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions, 2020-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e008494-e008494 |
issn | 1941-7640 1941-7632 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7053803 |
source | American Heart Association Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
title | Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A09%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stent-Only%20Versus%20Adjunctive%20Balloon%20Angioplasty%20Approach%20for%20Saphenous%20Vein%20Graft%20Percutaneous%20Coronary%20Intervention:%20Insights%20From%20DIVA%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Circulation.%20Cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Latif,%20Faisal&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e008494&rft.epage=e008494&rft.pages=e008494-e008494&rft.issn=1941-7640&rft.eissn=1941-7632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008494&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2351519106%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2351519106&rft_id=info:pmid/32019343&rfr_iscdi=true |