Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial

Direct stenting without pre-dilation or post-dilation has been advocated for saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention to decrease the incidence of distal embolization, periprocedural myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. We performed a post hoc analysis of patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions 2020-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e008494-e008494
Hauptverfasser: Latif, Faisal, Uyeda, Lauren, Edson, Robert, Bhatt, Deepak L., Goldman, Steven, Holmes, David R., Rao, Sunil V., Shunk, Kendrick, Aggarwal, Kul, Uretsky, Barry, Bolad, Islam, Ziada, Khaled, McFalls, Edward, Irimpen, Anand, Truong, Huu Tam, Kinlay, Scott, Papademetriou, Vasilios, Velagaleti, Raghava S., Rangan, Bavana V., Mavromatis, Kreton, Shih, Mei-Chiung, Banerjee, Subhash, Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e008494
container_issue 2
container_start_page e008494
container_title Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions
container_volume 13
creator Latif, Faisal
Uyeda, Lauren
Edson, Robert
Bhatt, Deepak L.
Goldman, Steven
Holmes, David R.
Rao, Sunil V.
Shunk, Kendrick
Aggarwal, Kul
Uretsky, Barry
Bolad, Islam
Ziada, Khaled
McFalls, Edward
Irimpen, Anand
Truong, Huu Tam
Kinlay, Scott
Papademetriou, Vasilios
Velagaleti, Raghava S.
Rangan, Bavana V.
Mavromatis, Kreton
Shih, Mei-Chiung
Banerjee, Subhash
Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
description Direct stenting without pre-dilation or post-dilation has been advocated for saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention to decrease the incidence of distal embolization, periprocedural myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. We performed a post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in the DIVA (Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty; NCT01121224) prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients were stratified into stent-only and balloon-stent groups. Primary end point was 12-month incidence of target vessel failure (defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Secondary end points included all-cause death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization during follow-up. Of the 575 patients included in this substudy, 185 (32%) patients underwent stent-only percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients in the stent-only versus balloon-stent group had similar baseline characteristics and similar incidence of target vessel failure at 12-months (15% versus 19%; hazard ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.86-2.08]; =0.19). During long-term follow-up (median of 2.7 years), the incidence of definite stent thrombosis (1% versus 5%; hazard ratio, 9.20 [95% CI, 1.23-68.92]; =0.0085), the composite of definite or probable stent thrombosis (5% versus 11%; hazard ratio, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.23-5.18]; =0.009), and target vessel myocardial infarction (8% versus 14%; hazard ratio, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.08-3.40]; =0.023) was lower in the stent-only group. Multivariable analysis showed that a higher number of years since coronary artery bypass grafting and >1 target saphenous vein graft lesions were associated with increased target vessel failure during entire follow-up, while preintervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-3 flow was protective. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of de novo saphenous vein graft lesions, there was no difference in target vessel failure at 12 months and long-term follow-up in the stent-only versus the balloon-stent group; however, the incidence of stent thrombosis was lower in the stent-only group, as was target vessel myocardial infarction. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01121224.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008494
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7053803</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2351519106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3646-42ec3a838a940878d7c8eb61fdad5cb2ced1c4a847e005bb91dc6435e0c402a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUV1v0zAUtRCIjcJfQH7ggZcMO3a-EEIKoRuRphatpa-W47iNh2tndtKpv4K_jKuMCoRky9fH5957fA8A7zC6wjjFH6r6rqoX6_ndZr5Y18vFKsDFFUI5LegzcIkLiqMsJfHzc0zRBXjl_T1CAU7jl-CCxAgXhJJL8Gs1SDNES6OPcCOdHz0s2_vRiEEdJPzCtbbWwNLslO0198MRln3vLBcd3FoHV7zvpLEhayOVgTeObwf4XToxDtzIE15ZZw13R1ibQbpDaKas-RhuXu26wcNrZ_fwa70p4doprl-DF1uuvXzzdM7Aj-v5uvoW3S5v6qq8jQRJaRrRWArCc5LzgqI8y9tM5LJJ8bblbSKaWMgWC8pzmkmEkqYpcCtSShKJBEUxT8gMfJ7q9mOzl60IuhzXrHdqH8QyyxX798Woju3sgWUoITkiocD7pwLOPozSD2yvvJBaT_9mMUlwggscZj4DnyaqcNZ7J7fnNhixk6fsP08DXLDJ05D-9m-p5-Q_JgYCnQiPVocZ-596fJSOdZLroWMIE5LRIoliFKPTQlHYQdZvvJGzwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2351519106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial</title><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Latif, Faisal ; Uyeda, Lauren ; Edson, Robert ; Bhatt, Deepak L. ; Goldman, Steven ; Holmes, David R. ; Rao, Sunil V. ; Shunk, Kendrick ; Aggarwal, Kul ; Uretsky, Barry ; Bolad, Islam ; Ziada, Khaled ; McFalls, Edward ; Irimpen, Anand ; Truong, Huu Tam ; Kinlay, Scott ; Papademetriou, Vasilios ; Velagaleti, Raghava S. ; Rangan, Bavana V. ; Mavromatis, Kreton ; Shih, Mei-Chiung ; Banerjee, Subhash ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Latif, Faisal ; Uyeda, Lauren ; Edson, Robert ; Bhatt, Deepak L. ; Goldman, Steven ; Holmes, David R. ; Rao, Sunil V. ; Shunk, Kendrick ; Aggarwal, Kul ; Uretsky, Barry ; Bolad, Islam ; Ziada, Khaled ; McFalls, Edward ; Irimpen, Anand ; Truong, Huu Tam ; Kinlay, Scott ; Papademetriou, Vasilios ; Velagaleti, Raghava S. ; Rangan, Bavana V. ; Mavromatis, Kreton ; Shih, Mei-Chiung ; Banerjee, Subhash ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creatorcontrib><description>Direct stenting without pre-dilation or post-dilation has been advocated for saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention to decrease the incidence of distal embolization, periprocedural myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. We performed a post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in the DIVA (Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty; NCT01121224) prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients were stratified into stent-only and balloon-stent groups. Primary end point was 12-month incidence of target vessel failure (defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Secondary end points included all-cause death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization during follow-up. Of the 575 patients included in this substudy, 185 (32%) patients underwent stent-only percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients in the stent-only versus balloon-stent group had similar baseline characteristics and similar incidence of target vessel failure at 12-months (15% versus 19%; hazard ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.86-2.08]; =0.19). During long-term follow-up (median of 2.7 years), the incidence of definite stent thrombosis (1% versus 5%; hazard ratio, 9.20 [95% CI, 1.23-68.92]; =0.0085), the composite of definite or probable stent thrombosis (5% versus 11%; hazard ratio, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.23-5.18]; =0.009), and target vessel myocardial infarction (8% versus 14%; hazard ratio, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.08-3.40]; =0.023) was lower in the stent-only group. Multivariable analysis showed that a higher number of years since coronary artery bypass grafting and &gt;1 target saphenous vein graft lesions were associated with increased target vessel failure during entire follow-up, while preintervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-3 flow was protective. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of de novo saphenous vein graft lesions, there was no difference in target vessel failure at 12 months and long-term follow-up in the stent-only versus the balloon-stent group; however, the incidence of stent thrombosis was lower in the stent-only group, as was target vessel myocardial infarction. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01121224.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-7640</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-7632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008494</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32019343</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions, 2020-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e008494-e008494</ispartof><rights>American Heart Association, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3646-42ec3a838a940878d7c8eb61fdad5cb2ced1c4a847e005bb91dc6435e0c402a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3686,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32019343$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Latif, Faisal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uyeda, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edson, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatt, Deepak L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Sunil V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shunk, Kendrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Kul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uretsky, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolad, Islam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziada, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFalls, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irimpen, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truong, Huu Tam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinlay, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papademetriou, Vasilios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velagaleti, Raghava S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rangan, Bavana V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavromatis, Kreton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Mei-Chiung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Subhash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creatorcontrib><title>Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial</title><title>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Circ Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><description>Direct stenting without pre-dilation or post-dilation has been advocated for saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention to decrease the incidence of distal embolization, periprocedural myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. We performed a post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in the DIVA (Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty; NCT01121224) prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients were stratified into stent-only and balloon-stent groups. Primary end point was 12-month incidence of target vessel failure (defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Secondary end points included all-cause death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization during follow-up. Of the 575 patients included in this substudy, 185 (32%) patients underwent stent-only percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients in the stent-only versus balloon-stent group had similar baseline characteristics and similar incidence of target vessel failure at 12-months (15% versus 19%; hazard ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.86-2.08]; =0.19). During long-term follow-up (median of 2.7 years), the incidence of definite stent thrombosis (1% versus 5%; hazard ratio, 9.20 [95% CI, 1.23-68.92]; =0.0085), the composite of definite or probable stent thrombosis (5% versus 11%; hazard ratio, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.23-5.18]; =0.009), and target vessel myocardial infarction (8% versus 14%; hazard ratio, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.08-3.40]; =0.023) was lower in the stent-only group. Multivariable analysis showed that a higher number of years since coronary artery bypass grafting and &gt;1 target saphenous vein graft lesions were associated with increased target vessel failure during entire follow-up, while preintervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-3 flow was protective. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of de novo saphenous vein graft lesions, there was no difference in target vessel failure at 12 months and long-term follow-up in the stent-only versus the balloon-stent group; however, the incidence of stent thrombosis was lower in the stent-only group, as was target vessel myocardial infarction. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01121224.</description><issn>1941-7640</issn><issn>1941-7632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplUV1v0zAUtRCIjcJfQH7ggZcMO3a-EEIKoRuRphatpa-W47iNh2tndtKpv4K_jKuMCoRky9fH5957fA8A7zC6wjjFH6r6rqoX6_ndZr5Y18vFKsDFFUI5LegzcIkLiqMsJfHzc0zRBXjl_T1CAU7jl-CCxAgXhJJL8Gs1SDNES6OPcCOdHz0s2_vRiEEdJPzCtbbWwNLslO0198MRln3vLBcd3FoHV7zvpLEhayOVgTeObwf4XToxDtzIE15ZZw13R1ibQbpDaKas-RhuXu26wcNrZ_fwa70p4doprl-DF1uuvXzzdM7Aj-v5uvoW3S5v6qq8jQRJaRrRWArCc5LzgqI8y9tM5LJJ8bblbSKaWMgWC8pzmkmEkqYpcCtSShKJBEUxT8gMfJ7q9mOzl60IuhzXrHdqH8QyyxX798Woju3sgWUoITkiocD7pwLOPozSD2yvvJBaT_9mMUlwggscZj4DnyaqcNZ7J7fnNhixk6fsP08DXLDJ05D-9m-p5-Q_JgYCnQiPVocZ-596fJSOdZLroWMIE5LRIoliFKPTQlHYQdZvvJGzwA</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Latif, Faisal</creator><creator>Uyeda, Lauren</creator><creator>Edson, Robert</creator><creator>Bhatt, Deepak L.</creator><creator>Goldman, Steven</creator><creator>Holmes, David R.</creator><creator>Rao, Sunil V.</creator><creator>Shunk, Kendrick</creator><creator>Aggarwal, Kul</creator><creator>Uretsky, Barry</creator><creator>Bolad, Islam</creator><creator>Ziada, Khaled</creator><creator>McFalls, Edward</creator><creator>Irimpen, Anand</creator><creator>Truong, Huu Tam</creator><creator>Kinlay, Scott</creator><creator>Papademetriou, Vasilios</creator><creator>Velagaleti, Raghava S.</creator><creator>Rangan, Bavana V.</creator><creator>Mavromatis, Kreton</creator><creator>Shih, Mei-Chiung</creator><creator>Banerjee, Subhash</creator><creator>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creator><general>American Heart Association, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial</title><author>Latif, Faisal ; Uyeda, Lauren ; Edson, Robert ; Bhatt, Deepak L. ; Goldman, Steven ; Holmes, David R. ; Rao, Sunil V. ; Shunk, Kendrick ; Aggarwal, Kul ; Uretsky, Barry ; Bolad, Islam ; Ziada, Khaled ; McFalls, Edward ; Irimpen, Anand ; Truong, Huu Tam ; Kinlay, Scott ; Papademetriou, Vasilios ; Velagaleti, Raghava S. ; Rangan, Bavana V. ; Mavromatis, Kreton ; Shih, Mei-Chiung ; Banerjee, Subhash ; Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3646-42ec3a838a940878d7c8eb61fdad5cb2ced1c4a847e005bb91dc6435e0c402a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Latif, Faisal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uyeda, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edson, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatt, Deepak L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Sunil V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shunk, Kendrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Kul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uretsky, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolad, Islam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziada, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFalls, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irimpen, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Truong, Huu Tam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinlay, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papademetriou, Vasilios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velagaleti, Raghava S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rangan, Bavana V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavromatis, Kreton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shih, Mei-Chiung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Subhash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Latif, Faisal</au><au>Uyeda, Lauren</au><au>Edson, Robert</au><au>Bhatt, Deepak L.</au><au>Goldman, Steven</au><au>Holmes, David R.</au><au>Rao, Sunil V.</au><au>Shunk, Kendrick</au><au>Aggarwal, Kul</au><au>Uretsky, Barry</au><au>Bolad, Islam</au><au>Ziada, Khaled</au><au>McFalls, Edward</au><au>Irimpen, Anand</au><au>Truong, Huu Tam</au><au>Kinlay, Scott</au><au>Papademetriou, Vasilios</au><au>Velagaleti, Raghava S.</au><au>Rangan, Bavana V.</au><au>Mavromatis, Kreton</au><au>Shih, Mei-Chiung</au><au>Banerjee, Subhash</au><au>Brilakis, Emmanouil S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial</atitle><jtitle>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Circ Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e008494</spage><epage>e008494</epage><pages>e008494-e008494</pages><issn>1941-7640</issn><eissn>1941-7632</eissn><abstract>Direct stenting without pre-dilation or post-dilation has been advocated for saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention to decrease the incidence of distal embolization, periprocedural myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. We performed a post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in the DIVA (Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty; NCT01121224) prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Patients were stratified into stent-only and balloon-stent groups. Primary end point was 12-month incidence of target vessel failure (defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Secondary end points included all-cause death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization during follow-up. Of the 575 patients included in this substudy, 185 (32%) patients underwent stent-only percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients in the stent-only versus balloon-stent group had similar baseline characteristics and similar incidence of target vessel failure at 12-months (15% versus 19%; hazard ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.86-2.08]; =0.19). During long-term follow-up (median of 2.7 years), the incidence of definite stent thrombosis (1% versus 5%; hazard ratio, 9.20 [95% CI, 1.23-68.92]; =0.0085), the composite of definite or probable stent thrombosis (5% versus 11%; hazard ratio, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.23-5.18]; =0.009), and target vessel myocardial infarction (8% versus 14%; hazard ratio, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.08-3.40]; =0.023) was lower in the stent-only group. Multivariable analysis showed that a higher number of years since coronary artery bypass grafting and &gt;1 target saphenous vein graft lesions were associated with increased target vessel failure during entire follow-up, while preintervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-3 flow was protective. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of de novo saphenous vein graft lesions, there was no difference in target vessel failure at 12 months and long-term follow-up in the stent-only versus the balloon-stent group; however, the incidence of stent thrombosis was lower in the stent-only group, as was target vessel myocardial infarction. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01121224.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Heart Association, Inc</pub><pmid>32019343</pmid><doi>10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008494</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1941-7640
ispartof Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions, 2020-02, Vol.13 (2), p.e008494-e008494
issn 1941-7640
1941-7632
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7053803
source American Heart Association Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Stent-Only Versus Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty Approach for Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From DIVA Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T19%3A09%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stent-Only%20Versus%20Adjunctive%20Balloon%20Angioplasty%20Approach%20for%20Saphenous%20Vein%20Graft%20Percutaneous%20Coronary%20Intervention:%20Insights%20From%20DIVA%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Circulation.%20Cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Latif,%20Faisal&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e008494&rft.epage=e008494&rft.pages=e008494-e008494&rft.issn=1941-7640&rft.eissn=1941-7632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008494&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2351519106%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2351519106&rft_id=info:pmid/32019343&rfr_iscdi=true