Mortality impact of achieving WHO cervical cancer elimination targets: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries
WHO is developing a global strategy towards eliminating cervical cancer as a public health problem, which proposes an elimination threshold of four cases per 100 000 women and includes 2030 triple-intervention coverage targets for scale-up of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination to 90%, twice-life...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2020-02, Vol.395 (10224), p.591-603 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 603 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10224 |
container_start_page | 591 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 395 |
creator | Canfell, Karen Kim, Jane J Brisson, Marc Keane, Adam Simms, Kate T Caruana, Michael Burger, Emily A Martin, Dave Nguyen, Diep T N Bénard, Élodie Sy, Stephen Regan, Catherine Drolet, Mélanie Gingras, Guillaume Laprise, Jean-Francois Torode, Julie Smith, Megan A Fidarova, Elena Trapani, Dario Bray, Freddie Ilbawi, Andre Broutet, Nathalie Hutubessy, Raymond |
description | WHO is developing a global strategy towards eliminating cervical cancer as a public health problem, which proposes an elimination threshold of four cases per 100 000 women and includes 2030 triple-intervention coverage targets for scale-up of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination to 90%, twice-lifetime cervical screening to 70%, and treatment of pre-invasive lesions and invasive cancer to 90%. We assessed the impact of achieving the 90–70–90 triple-intervention targets on cervical cancer mortality and deaths averted over the next century. We also assessed the potential for the elimination initiative to support target 3.4 of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—a one-third reduction in premature mortality from non-communicable diseases by 2030.
The WHO Cervical Cancer Elimination Modelling Consortium (CCEMC) involves three independent, dynamic models of HPV infection, cervical carcinogenesis, screening, and precancer and invasive cancer treatment. Reductions in age-standardised rates of cervical cancer mortality in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) were estimated for three core scenarios: girls-only vaccination at age 9 years with catch-up for girls aged 10–14 years; girls-only vaccination plus once-lifetime screening and cancer treatment scale-up; and girls-only vaccination plus twice-lifetime screening and cancer treatment scale-up. Vaccination was assumed to provide 100% lifetime protection against infections with HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58, and to scale up to 90% coverage in 2020. Cervical screening involved HPV testing at age 35 years, or at ages 35 years and 45 years, with scale-up to 45% coverage by 2023, 70% by 2030, and 90% by 2045, and we assumed that 50% of women with invasive cervical cancer would receive appropriate surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy by 2023, which would increase to 90% by 2030. We summarised results using the median (range) of model predictions.
In 2020, the estimated cervical cancer mortality rate across all 78 LMICs was 13·2 (range 12·9–14·1) per 100 000 women. Compared to the status quo, by 2030, vaccination alone would have minimal impact on cervical cancer mortality, leading to a 0·1% (0·1–0·5) reduction, but additionally scaling up twice-lifetime screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 34·2% (23·3–37·8), averting 300 000 (300 000–400 000) deaths by 2030 (with similar results for once-lifetime screening). By 2070, scaling up vaccination alone would reduce m |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30157-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7043006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673620301574</els_id><sourcerecordid>2376108701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-259afdb5ed3c70aa7e633b005f93b0c362de053ee398177c7df495ba488fa0893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUc1u1DAQthCILoVHAFniQg-BcezECQcQqoAiFfUACG6W155sXTnx1vam2lfhafF22xWcOI098_14_BHynMFrBqx98w2YgKqVvH1VwwkH1shKPCALJqSoGiF_PSSLA-SIPEnpCgBEC81jcsRrAMlEvSC_v4aYtXd5S9241ibTMFBtLh3OblrRn2cX1GCcndGeGj2VM0XvRjfp7MJEs44rzOkt1dSEwo-lPSMdg0XvdwJ60n6bXKJuorKjPtxUbipQLBO7u2KsRmetx_u-CZspR4fpKXk0aJ_w2V09Jj8-ffx-eladX3z-cvrhvDJlzVzVTa8Hu2zQciNBa4kt50uAZuhLMbytLULDEXnfMSmNtIPom6UWXTdo6Hp-TN7tddeb5YjWYLHXXq2jG3XcqqCd-ncyuUu1CrOSIDhAWwRe3gnEcL3BlNVV2MSyeFI1ly2DTgIrqGaPMjGkFHE4ODBQu0jVbaRql5eqQd1GqkThvfj7eQfWfYYF8H4PwPJJs8OoknFYorIuosnKBvcfiz-scbS-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2376108701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mortality impact of achieving WHO cervical cancer elimination targets: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Canfell, Karen ; Kim, Jane J ; Brisson, Marc ; Keane, Adam ; Simms, Kate T ; Caruana, Michael ; Burger, Emily A ; Martin, Dave ; Nguyen, Diep T N ; Bénard, Élodie ; Sy, Stephen ; Regan, Catherine ; Drolet, Mélanie ; Gingras, Guillaume ; Laprise, Jean-Francois ; Torode, Julie ; Smith, Megan A ; Fidarova, Elena ; Trapani, Dario ; Bray, Freddie ; Ilbawi, Andre ; Broutet, Nathalie ; Hutubessy, Raymond</creator><creatorcontrib>Canfell, Karen ; Kim, Jane J ; Brisson, Marc ; Keane, Adam ; Simms, Kate T ; Caruana, Michael ; Burger, Emily A ; Martin, Dave ; Nguyen, Diep T N ; Bénard, Élodie ; Sy, Stephen ; Regan, Catherine ; Drolet, Mélanie ; Gingras, Guillaume ; Laprise, Jean-Francois ; Torode, Julie ; Smith, Megan A ; Fidarova, Elena ; Trapani, Dario ; Bray, Freddie ; Ilbawi, Andre ; Broutet, Nathalie ; Hutubessy, Raymond</creatorcontrib><description>WHO is developing a global strategy towards eliminating cervical cancer as a public health problem, which proposes an elimination threshold of four cases per 100 000 women and includes 2030 triple-intervention coverage targets for scale-up of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination to 90%, twice-lifetime cervical screening to 70%, and treatment of pre-invasive lesions and invasive cancer to 90%. We assessed the impact of achieving the 90–70–90 triple-intervention targets on cervical cancer mortality and deaths averted over the next century. We also assessed the potential for the elimination initiative to support target 3.4 of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—a one-third reduction in premature mortality from non-communicable diseases by 2030.
The WHO Cervical Cancer Elimination Modelling Consortium (CCEMC) involves three independent, dynamic models of HPV infection, cervical carcinogenesis, screening, and precancer and invasive cancer treatment. Reductions in age-standardised rates of cervical cancer mortality in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) were estimated for three core scenarios: girls-only vaccination at age 9 years with catch-up for girls aged 10–14 years; girls-only vaccination plus once-lifetime screening and cancer treatment scale-up; and girls-only vaccination plus twice-lifetime screening and cancer treatment scale-up. Vaccination was assumed to provide 100% lifetime protection against infections with HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58, and to scale up to 90% coverage in 2020. Cervical screening involved HPV testing at age 35 years, or at ages 35 years and 45 years, with scale-up to 45% coverage by 2023, 70% by 2030, and 90% by 2045, and we assumed that 50% of women with invasive cervical cancer would receive appropriate surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy by 2023, which would increase to 90% by 2030. We summarised results using the median (range) of model predictions.
In 2020, the estimated cervical cancer mortality rate across all 78 LMICs was 13·2 (range 12·9–14·1) per 100 000 women. Compared to the status quo, by 2030, vaccination alone would have minimal impact on cervical cancer mortality, leading to a 0·1% (0·1–0·5) reduction, but additionally scaling up twice-lifetime screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 34·2% (23·3–37·8), averting 300 000 (300 000–400 000) deaths by 2030 (with similar results for once-lifetime screening). By 2070, scaling up vaccination alone would reduce mortality by 61·7% (61·4–66·1), averting 4·8 million (4·1–4·8) deaths. By 2070, additionally scaling up screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 88·9% (84·0–89·3), averting 13·3 million (13·1–13·6) deaths (with once-lifetime screening), or by 92·3% (88·4–93·0), averting 14·6 million (14·1–14·6) deaths (with twice-lifetime screening). By 2120, vaccination alone would reduce mortality by 89·5% (86·6–89·9), averting 45·8 million (44·7–46·4) deaths. By 2120, additionally scaling up screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 97·9% (95·0–98·0), averting 60·8 million (60·2–61·2) deaths (with once-lifetime screening), or by 98·6% (96·5–98·6), averting 62·6 million (62·1–62·8) deaths (with twice-lifetime screening). With the WHO triple-intervention strategy, over the next 10 years, about half (48% [45–55]) of deaths averted would be in sub-Saharan Africa and almost a third (32% [29–34]) would be in South Asia; over the next 100 years, almost 90% of deaths averted would be in these regions. For premature deaths (age 30–69 years), the WHO triple-intervention strategy would result in rate reductions of 33·9% (24·4–37·9) by 2030, 96·2% (94·3–96·8) by 2070, and 98·6% (96·9–98·8) by 2120.
These findings emphasise the importance of acting immediately on three fronts to scale up vaccination, screening, and treatment for pre-invasive and invasive cervical cancer. In the next 10 years, a one-third reduction in the rate of premature mortality from cervical cancer in LMICs is possible, contributing to the realisation of the 2030 UN SDGs. Over the next century, successful implementation of the WHO elimination strategy would reduce cervical cancer mortality by almost 99% and save more than 62 million women's lives.
WHO, UNDP, UN Population Fund, UNICEF–WHO–World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Germany Federal Ministry of Health, National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Centre for Research Excellence in Cervical Cancer Control, Canadian Institute of Health Research, Compute Canada, and Fonds de recherche du Québec–Santé.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30157-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32007142</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cancer ; Carcinogenesis ; Carcinogens ; Cervical cancer ; Cervix ; Chemotherapy ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Consortia ; Developing Countries ; Dynamic models ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Fatalities ; Female ; Health services ; Human papillomavirus ; Humans ; Income ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Invasiveness ; Low income groups ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; Modelling ; Models, Biological ; Mortality ; Mortality - trends ; Papillomavirus Infections - complications ; Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control ; Papillomavirus Vaccines ; Public health ; R&D ; Radiation therapy ; Research & development ; Scaling ; Scaling up ; Strategy ; Surgery ; Sustainable development ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology ; Vaccination ; Vaccination - methods ; Womens health ; World Health Organization ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2020-02, Vol.395 (10224), p.591-603</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (theLicense”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-259afdb5ed3c70aa7e633b005f93b0c362de053ee398177c7df495ba488fa0893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-259afdb5ed3c70aa7e633b005f93b0c362de053ee398177c7df495ba488fa0893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673620301574$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32007142$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Canfell, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jane J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brisson, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simms, Kate T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caruana, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Emily A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Diep T N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bénard, Élodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sy, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regan, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drolet, Mélanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gingras, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laprise, Jean-Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torode, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Megan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidarova, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trapani, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bray, Freddie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilbawi, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broutet, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutubessy, Raymond</creatorcontrib><title>Mortality impact of achieving WHO cervical cancer elimination targets: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>WHO is developing a global strategy towards eliminating cervical cancer as a public health problem, which proposes an elimination threshold of four cases per 100 000 women and includes 2030 triple-intervention coverage targets for scale-up of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination to 90%, twice-lifetime cervical screening to 70%, and treatment of pre-invasive lesions and invasive cancer to 90%. We assessed the impact of achieving the 90–70–90 triple-intervention targets on cervical cancer mortality and deaths averted over the next century. We also assessed the potential for the elimination initiative to support target 3.4 of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—a one-third reduction in premature mortality from non-communicable diseases by 2030.
The WHO Cervical Cancer Elimination Modelling Consortium (CCEMC) involves three independent, dynamic models of HPV infection, cervical carcinogenesis, screening, and precancer and invasive cancer treatment. Reductions in age-standardised rates of cervical cancer mortality in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) were estimated for three core scenarios: girls-only vaccination at age 9 years with catch-up for girls aged 10–14 years; girls-only vaccination plus once-lifetime screening and cancer treatment scale-up; and girls-only vaccination plus twice-lifetime screening and cancer treatment scale-up. Vaccination was assumed to provide 100% lifetime protection against infections with HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58, and to scale up to 90% coverage in 2020. Cervical screening involved HPV testing at age 35 years, or at ages 35 years and 45 years, with scale-up to 45% coverage by 2023, 70% by 2030, and 90% by 2045, and we assumed that 50% of women with invasive cervical cancer would receive appropriate surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy by 2023, which would increase to 90% by 2030. We summarised results using the median (range) of model predictions.
In 2020, the estimated cervical cancer mortality rate across all 78 LMICs was 13·2 (range 12·9–14·1) per 100 000 women. Compared to the status quo, by 2030, vaccination alone would have minimal impact on cervical cancer mortality, leading to a 0·1% (0·1–0·5) reduction, but additionally scaling up twice-lifetime screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 34·2% (23·3–37·8), averting 300 000 (300 000–400 000) deaths by 2030 (with similar results for once-lifetime screening). By 2070, scaling up vaccination alone would reduce mortality by 61·7% (61·4–66·1), averting 4·8 million (4·1–4·8) deaths. By 2070, additionally scaling up screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 88·9% (84·0–89·3), averting 13·3 million (13·1–13·6) deaths (with once-lifetime screening), or by 92·3% (88·4–93·0), averting 14·6 million (14·1–14·6) deaths (with twice-lifetime screening). By 2120, vaccination alone would reduce mortality by 89·5% (86·6–89·9), averting 45·8 million (44·7–46·4) deaths. By 2120, additionally scaling up screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 97·9% (95·0–98·0), averting 60·8 million (60·2–61·2) deaths (with once-lifetime screening), or by 98·6% (96·5–98·6), averting 62·6 million (62·1–62·8) deaths (with twice-lifetime screening). With the WHO triple-intervention strategy, over the next 10 years, about half (48% [45–55]) of deaths averted would be in sub-Saharan Africa and almost a third (32% [29–34]) would be in South Asia; over the next 100 years, almost 90% of deaths averted would be in these regions. For premature deaths (age 30–69 years), the WHO triple-intervention strategy would result in rate reductions of 33·9% (24·4–37·9) by 2030, 96·2% (94·3–96·8) by 2070, and 98·6% (96·9–98·8) by 2120.
These findings emphasise the importance of acting immediately on three fronts to scale up vaccination, screening, and treatment for pre-invasive and invasive cervical cancer. In the next 10 years, a one-third reduction in the rate of premature mortality from cervical cancer in LMICs is possible, contributing to the realisation of the 2030 UN SDGs. Over the next century, successful implementation of the WHO elimination strategy would reduce cervical cancer mortality by almost 99% and save more than 62 million women's lives.
WHO, UNDP, UN Population Fund, UNICEF–WHO–World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Germany Federal Ministry of Health, National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Centre for Research Excellence in Cervical Cancer Control, Canadian Institute of Health Research, Compute Canada, and Fonds de recherche du Québec–Santé.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carcinogenesis</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Dynamic models</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Mortality - trends</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Vaccines</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Scaling up</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccination - methods</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>World Health Organization</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUc1u1DAQthCILoVHAFniQg-BcezECQcQqoAiFfUACG6W155sXTnx1vam2lfhafF22xWcOI098_14_BHynMFrBqx98w2YgKqVvH1VwwkH1shKPCALJqSoGiF_PSSLA-SIPEnpCgBEC81jcsRrAMlEvSC_v4aYtXd5S9241ibTMFBtLh3OblrRn2cX1GCcndGeGj2VM0XvRjfp7MJEs44rzOkt1dSEwo-lPSMdg0XvdwJ60n6bXKJuorKjPtxUbipQLBO7u2KsRmetx_u-CZspR4fpKXk0aJ_w2V09Jj8-ffx-eladX3z-cvrhvDJlzVzVTa8Hu2zQciNBa4kt50uAZuhLMbytLULDEXnfMSmNtIPom6UWXTdo6Hp-TN7tddeb5YjWYLHXXq2jG3XcqqCd-ncyuUu1CrOSIDhAWwRe3gnEcL3BlNVV2MSyeFI1ly2DTgIrqGaPMjGkFHE4ODBQu0jVbaRql5eqQd1GqkThvfj7eQfWfYYF8H4PwPJJs8OoknFYorIuosnKBvcfiz-scbS-</recordid><startdate>20200222</startdate><enddate>20200222</enddate><creator>Canfell, Karen</creator><creator>Kim, Jane J</creator><creator>Brisson, Marc</creator><creator>Keane, Adam</creator><creator>Simms, Kate T</creator><creator>Caruana, Michael</creator><creator>Burger, Emily A</creator><creator>Martin, Dave</creator><creator>Nguyen, Diep T N</creator><creator>Bénard, Élodie</creator><creator>Sy, Stephen</creator><creator>Regan, Catherine</creator><creator>Drolet, Mélanie</creator><creator>Gingras, Guillaume</creator><creator>Laprise, Jean-Francois</creator><creator>Torode, Julie</creator><creator>Smith, Megan A</creator><creator>Fidarova, Elena</creator><creator>Trapani, Dario</creator><creator>Bray, Freddie</creator><creator>Ilbawi, Andre</creator><creator>Broutet, Nathalie</creator><creator>Hutubessy, Raymond</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200222</creationdate><title>Mortality impact of achieving WHO cervical cancer elimination targets: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries</title><author>Canfell, Karen ; Kim, Jane J ; Brisson, Marc ; Keane, Adam ; Simms, Kate T ; Caruana, Michael ; Burger, Emily A ; Martin, Dave ; Nguyen, Diep T N ; Bénard, Élodie ; Sy, Stephen ; Regan, Catherine ; Drolet, Mélanie ; Gingras, Guillaume ; Laprise, Jean-Francois ; Torode, Julie ; Smith, Megan A ; Fidarova, Elena ; Trapani, Dario ; Bray, Freddie ; Ilbawi, Andre ; Broutet, Nathalie ; Hutubessy, Raymond</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-259afdb5ed3c70aa7e633b005f93b0c362de053ee398177c7df495ba488fa0893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carcinogenesis</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Dynamic models</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Mortality - trends</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - complications</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Vaccines</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Scaling up</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccination - methods</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>World Health Organization</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Canfell, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jane J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brisson, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simms, Kate T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caruana, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Emily A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Diep T N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bénard, Élodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sy, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regan, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drolet, Mélanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gingras, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laprise, Jean-Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torode, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Megan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidarova, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trapani, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bray, Freddie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilbawi, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broutet, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutubessy, Raymond</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Canfell, Karen</au><au>Kim, Jane J</au><au>Brisson, Marc</au><au>Keane, Adam</au><au>Simms, Kate T</au><au>Caruana, Michael</au><au>Burger, Emily A</au><au>Martin, Dave</au><au>Nguyen, Diep T N</au><au>Bénard, Élodie</au><au>Sy, Stephen</au><au>Regan, Catherine</au><au>Drolet, Mélanie</au><au>Gingras, Guillaume</au><au>Laprise, Jean-Francois</au><au>Torode, Julie</au><au>Smith, Megan A</au><au>Fidarova, Elena</au><au>Trapani, Dario</au><au>Bray, Freddie</au><au>Ilbawi, Andre</au><au>Broutet, Nathalie</au><au>Hutubessy, Raymond</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mortality impact of achieving WHO cervical cancer elimination targets: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>2020-02-22</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>395</volume><issue>10224</issue><spage>591</spage><epage>603</epage><pages>591-603</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><abstract>WHO is developing a global strategy towards eliminating cervical cancer as a public health problem, which proposes an elimination threshold of four cases per 100 000 women and includes 2030 triple-intervention coverage targets for scale-up of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination to 90%, twice-lifetime cervical screening to 70%, and treatment of pre-invasive lesions and invasive cancer to 90%. We assessed the impact of achieving the 90–70–90 triple-intervention targets on cervical cancer mortality and deaths averted over the next century. We also assessed the potential for the elimination initiative to support target 3.4 of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—a one-third reduction in premature mortality from non-communicable diseases by 2030.
The WHO Cervical Cancer Elimination Modelling Consortium (CCEMC) involves three independent, dynamic models of HPV infection, cervical carcinogenesis, screening, and precancer and invasive cancer treatment. Reductions in age-standardised rates of cervical cancer mortality in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) were estimated for three core scenarios: girls-only vaccination at age 9 years with catch-up for girls aged 10–14 years; girls-only vaccination plus once-lifetime screening and cancer treatment scale-up; and girls-only vaccination plus twice-lifetime screening and cancer treatment scale-up. Vaccination was assumed to provide 100% lifetime protection against infections with HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58, and to scale up to 90% coverage in 2020. Cervical screening involved HPV testing at age 35 years, or at ages 35 years and 45 years, with scale-up to 45% coverage by 2023, 70% by 2030, and 90% by 2045, and we assumed that 50% of women with invasive cervical cancer would receive appropriate surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy by 2023, which would increase to 90% by 2030. We summarised results using the median (range) of model predictions.
In 2020, the estimated cervical cancer mortality rate across all 78 LMICs was 13·2 (range 12·9–14·1) per 100 000 women. Compared to the status quo, by 2030, vaccination alone would have minimal impact on cervical cancer mortality, leading to a 0·1% (0·1–0·5) reduction, but additionally scaling up twice-lifetime screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 34·2% (23·3–37·8), averting 300 000 (300 000–400 000) deaths by 2030 (with similar results for once-lifetime screening). By 2070, scaling up vaccination alone would reduce mortality by 61·7% (61·4–66·1), averting 4·8 million (4·1–4·8) deaths. By 2070, additionally scaling up screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 88·9% (84·0–89·3), averting 13·3 million (13·1–13·6) deaths (with once-lifetime screening), or by 92·3% (88·4–93·0), averting 14·6 million (14·1–14·6) deaths (with twice-lifetime screening). By 2120, vaccination alone would reduce mortality by 89·5% (86·6–89·9), averting 45·8 million (44·7–46·4) deaths. By 2120, additionally scaling up screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 97·9% (95·0–98·0), averting 60·8 million (60·2–61·2) deaths (with once-lifetime screening), or by 98·6% (96·5–98·6), averting 62·6 million (62·1–62·8) deaths (with twice-lifetime screening). With the WHO triple-intervention strategy, over the next 10 years, about half (48% [45–55]) of deaths averted would be in sub-Saharan Africa and almost a third (32% [29–34]) would be in South Asia; over the next 100 years, almost 90% of deaths averted would be in these regions. For premature deaths (age 30–69 years), the WHO triple-intervention strategy would result in rate reductions of 33·9% (24·4–37·9) by 2030, 96·2% (94·3–96·8) by 2070, and 98·6% (96·9–98·8) by 2120.
These findings emphasise the importance of acting immediately on three fronts to scale up vaccination, screening, and treatment for pre-invasive and invasive cervical cancer. In the next 10 years, a one-third reduction in the rate of premature mortality from cervical cancer in LMICs is possible, contributing to the realisation of the 2030 UN SDGs. Over the next century, successful implementation of the WHO elimination strategy would reduce cervical cancer mortality by almost 99% and save more than 62 million women's lives.
WHO, UNDP, UN Population Fund, UNICEF–WHO–World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Germany Federal Ministry of Health, National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Centre for Research Excellence in Cervical Cancer Control, Canadian Institute of Health Research, Compute Canada, and Fonds de recherche du Québec–Santé.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32007142</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30157-4</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 2020-02, Vol.395 (10224), p.591-603 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7043006 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Aged Aged, 80 and over Cancer Carcinogenesis Carcinogens Cervical cancer Cervix Chemotherapy Child Child, Preschool Consortia Developing Countries Dynamic models Early Detection of Cancer - methods Fatalities Female Health services Human papillomavirus Humans Income Infant Infant, Newborn Invasiveness Low income groups Mass Screening - methods Medical research Middle Aged Modelling Models, Biological Mortality Mortality - trends Papillomavirus Infections - complications Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control Papillomavirus Vaccines Public health R&D Radiation therapy Research & development Scaling Scaling up Strategy Surgery Sustainable development Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - mortality Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - virology Vaccination Vaccination - methods Womens health World Health Organization Young Adult |
title | Mortality impact of achieving WHO cervical cancer elimination targets: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A09%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mortality%20impact%20of%20achieving%20WHO%20cervical%20cancer%20elimination%20targets:%20a%20comparative%20modelling%20analysis%20in%2078%20low-income%20and%20lower-middle-income%20countries&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Canfell,%20Karen&rft.date=2020-02-22&rft.volume=395&rft.issue=10224&rft.spage=591&rft.epage=603&rft.pages=591-603&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30157-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2376108701%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2376108701&rft_id=info:pmid/32007142&rft_els_id=S0140673620301574&rfr_iscdi=true |