Standard Precautions Among Emergency Medical Services in Urban and Rural Areas
Backround: Emergency medical services (EMS) workers are at risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens and frequently exposed to blood and bodily fluids through percutaneous injuries. This study aimed to assess the consistency with which standard precautions (SPs) among rural and urban EMS providers we...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AAOHN journal 2020-02, Vol.68 (2), p.73-80 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 80 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 73 |
container_title | AAOHN journal |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Alhazmi, Riyadh A. Parker, R. David Wen, Sijin |
description | Backround: Emergency medical services (EMS) workers are at risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens and frequently exposed to blood and bodily fluids through percutaneous injuries. This study aimed to assess the consistency with which standard precautions (SPs) among rural and urban EMS providers were used. Methods: This study consisted of a cross-sectional survey conducted with a sample of certified EMS providers in West Virginia in which we ascertained details about sociodemographic characteristics, and the frequency of consistent SP. An email invitation was sent to a comprehensive list of agencies obtained from the Office of West Virginia EMS. Findings: A total of 248 out of 522 (47%) EMS providers completed the survey. The majority of the EMS providers (76%) consistently complied with SPs; however, more than one third (38%) of urban EMS providers indicated inconsistent use compared with 19% of rural EMS providers (p = .002). Most EMS providers reported low prevention practices to exposure of blood and body fluids in both areas. Conclusion/Application to Practice: The results emphasize the need to enhanced safe work practices among EMS providers in both rural and urban areas through education and increasing self-awareness. Occupational health professional in municipalities that serve these workers are instrumental in ensuring these workers are trained and evaluated for their compliance with SPs while in the field. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2165079919864118 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7041279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2165079919864118</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2309497502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3edd02c7db13059eed8fa6326299ab29c22d4eb4110dda2eb22fa96f07a3c1703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoVtS9Kwm4cTOaZGaSZiOU4gvqA7XrkEnu1CmdTE1mBP-9KX2oBbNJyP3OufdwETqh5IJSIS4Z5TkRUlLZ5xml_R10sPhKiORyd_2O9R46DmFK4pFCZnl_H_XShVSS_AA9vrbaWe0tfvZgdNdWjQt4UDdugq9r8BNw5gs_gK2MnuFX8J-VgYArh8e-0A5HMX7pfKwNPOhwhPZKPQtwvLoP0fjm-m14l4yebu-Hg1FiMs7aJAVrCTPCFjQluQSw_VLzlHEmpS6YNIzZDIqYilirGRSMlVrykgidGipIeoiulr7zrqjBGnBtnEHNfVVr_6UaXam_FVe9q0nzqQTJKBMyGpyvDHzz0UFoVV0FA7OZdtB0QbGUyEyKnLCInm2h06bzLsaLVJpxnjNCI0WWlPFNCB7KzTCUqMW-1Pa-ouT0d4iNYL2dCCRLIOgJ_HT91_AbXYecsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2334665201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standard Precautions Among Emergency Medical Services in Urban and Rural Areas</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Alhazmi, Riyadh A. ; Parker, R. David ; Wen, Sijin</creator><creatorcontrib>Alhazmi, Riyadh A. ; Parker, R. David ; Wen, Sijin</creatorcontrib><description>Backround: Emergency medical services (EMS) workers are at risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens and frequently exposed to blood and bodily fluids through percutaneous injuries. This study aimed to assess the consistency with which standard precautions (SPs) among rural and urban EMS providers were used. Methods: This study consisted of a cross-sectional survey conducted with a sample of certified EMS providers in West Virginia in which we ascertained details about sociodemographic characteristics, and the frequency of consistent SP. An email invitation was sent to a comprehensive list of agencies obtained from the Office of West Virginia EMS. Findings: A total of 248 out of 522 (47%) EMS providers completed the survey. The majority of the EMS providers (76%) consistently complied with SPs; however, more than one third (38%) of urban EMS providers indicated inconsistent use compared with 19% of rural EMS providers (p = .002). Most EMS providers reported low prevention practices to exposure of blood and body fluids in both areas. Conclusion/Application to Practice: The results emphasize the need to enhanced safe work practices among EMS providers in both rural and urban areas through education and increasing self-awareness. Occupational health professional in municipalities that serve these workers are instrumental in ensuring these workers are trained and evaluated for their compliance with SPs while in the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2165-0799</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2165-0969</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2165079919864118</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31650905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accident prevention ; Adult ; Blood ; Blood-Borne Pathogens ; Body fluids ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Medical Services - methods ; Emergency Medical Technicians - statistics & numerical data ; Emergency services ; Exposure ; Female ; Humans ; Infection Control - methods ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Middle Aged ; Municipalities ; Nursing ; Occupational exposure ; Occupational Exposure - prevention & control ; Occupational health ; Outsourcing ; Polls & surveys ; Rural areas ; Rural Population ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Universal Precautions - statistics & numerical data ; Urban areas ; Urban Population ; West Virginia</subject><ispartof>AAOHN journal, 2020-02, Vol.68 (2), p.73-80</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3edd02c7db13059eed8fa6326299ab29c22d4eb4110dda2eb22fa96f07a3c1703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3edd02c7db13059eed8fa6326299ab29c22d4eb4110dda2eb22fa96f07a3c1703</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7084-5645</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2165079919864118$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2165079919864118$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31650905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alhazmi, Riyadh A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, R. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Sijin</creatorcontrib><title>Standard Precautions Among Emergency Medical Services in Urban and Rural Areas</title><title>AAOHN journal</title><addtitle>Workplace Health Saf</addtitle><description>Backround: Emergency medical services (EMS) workers are at risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens and frequently exposed to blood and bodily fluids through percutaneous injuries. This study aimed to assess the consistency with which standard precautions (SPs) among rural and urban EMS providers were used. Methods: This study consisted of a cross-sectional survey conducted with a sample of certified EMS providers in West Virginia in which we ascertained details about sociodemographic characteristics, and the frequency of consistent SP. An email invitation was sent to a comprehensive list of agencies obtained from the Office of West Virginia EMS. Findings: A total of 248 out of 522 (47%) EMS providers completed the survey. The majority of the EMS providers (76%) consistently complied with SPs; however, more than one third (38%) of urban EMS providers indicated inconsistent use compared with 19% of rural EMS providers (p = .002). Most EMS providers reported low prevention practices to exposure of blood and body fluids in both areas. Conclusion/Application to Practice: The results emphasize the need to enhanced safe work practices among EMS providers in both rural and urban areas through education and increasing self-awareness. Occupational health professional in municipalities that serve these workers are instrumental in ensuring these workers are trained and evaluated for their compliance with SPs while in the field.</description><subject>Accident prevention</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood-Borne Pathogens</subject><subject>Body fluids</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - methods</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Technicians - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - prevention & control</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Outsourcing</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Universal Precautions - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban Population</subject><subject>West Virginia</subject><issn>2165-0799</issn><issn>2165-0969</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoVtS9Kwm4cTOaZGaSZiOU4gvqA7XrkEnu1CmdTE1mBP-9KX2oBbNJyP3OufdwETqh5IJSIS4Z5TkRUlLZ5xml_R10sPhKiORyd_2O9R46DmFK4pFCZnl_H_XShVSS_AA9vrbaWe0tfvZgdNdWjQt4UDdugq9r8BNw5gs_gK2MnuFX8J-VgYArh8e-0A5HMX7pfKwNPOhwhPZKPQtwvLoP0fjm-m14l4yebu-Hg1FiMs7aJAVrCTPCFjQluQSw_VLzlHEmpS6YNIzZDIqYilirGRSMlVrykgidGipIeoiulr7zrqjBGnBtnEHNfVVr_6UaXam_FVe9q0nzqQTJKBMyGpyvDHzz0UFoVV0FA7OZdtB0QbGUyEyKnLCInm2h06bzLsaLVJpxnjNCI0WWlPFNCB7KzTCUqMW-1Pa-ouT0d4iNYL2dCCRLIOgJ_HT91_AbXYecsg</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Alhazmi, Riyadh A.</creator><creator>Parker, R. David</creator><creator>Wen, Sijin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7084-5645</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Standard Precautions Among Emergency Medical Services in Urban and Rural Areas</title><author>Alhazmi, Riyadh A. ; Parker, R. David ; Wen, Sijin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3edd02c7db13059eed8fa6326299ab29c22d4eb4110dda2eb22fa96f07a3c1703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accident prevention</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood-Borne Pathogens</topic><topic>Body fluids</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - methods</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Technicians - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - prevention & control</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Outsourcing</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Universal Precautions - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban Population</topic><topic>West Virginia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alhazmi, Riyadh A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, R. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Sijin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>AAOHN journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alhazmi, Riyadh A.</au><au>Parker, R. David</au><au>Wen, Sijin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Standard Precautions Among Emergency Medical Services in Urban and Rural Areas</atitle><jtitle>AAOHN journal</jtitle><addtitle>Workplace Health Saf</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>73-80</pages><issn>2165-0799</issn><eissn>2165-0969</eissn><abstract>Backround: Emergency medical services (EMS) workers are at risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens and frequently exposed to blood and bodily fluids through percutaneous injuries. This study aimed to assess the consistency with which standard precautions (SPs) among rural and urban EMS providers were used. Methods: This study consisted of a cross-sectional survey conducted with a sample of certified EMS providers in West Virginia in which we ascertained details about sociodemographic characteristics, and the frequency of consistent SP. An email invitation was sent to a comprehensive list of agencies obtained from the Office of West Virginia EMS. Findings: A total of 248 out of 522 (47%) EMS providers completed the survey. The majority of the EMS providers (76%) consistently complied with SPs; however, more than one third (38%) of urban EMS providers indicated inconsistent use compared with 19% of rural EMS providers (p = .002). Most EMS providers reported low prevention practices to exposure of blood and body fluids in both areas. Conclusion/Application to Practice: The results emphasize the need to enhanced safe work practices among EMS providers in both rural and urban areas through education and increasing self-awareness. Occupational health professional in municipalities that serve these workers are instrumental in ensuring these workers are trained and evaluated for their compliance with SPs while in the field.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31650905</pmid><doi>10.1177/2165079919864118</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7084-5645</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2165-0799 |
ispartof | AAOHN journal, 2020-02, Vol.68 (2), p.73-80 |
issn | 2165-0799 2165-0969 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7041279 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Accident prevention Adult Blood Blood-Borne Pathogens Body fluids Cross-Sectional Studies Emergency medical care Emergency medical services Emergency Medical Services - methods Emergency Medical Technicians - statistics & numerical data Emergency services Exposure Female Humans Infection Control - methods Male Medical personnel Middle Aged Municipalities Nursing Occupational exposure Occupational Exposure - prevention & control Occupational health Outsourcing Polls & surveys Rural areas Rural Population Surveys and Questionnaires Universal Precautions - statistics & numerical data Urban areas Urban Population West Virginia |
title | Standard Precautions Among Emergency Medical Services in Urban and Rural Areas |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A29%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standard%20Precautions%20Among%20Emergency%20Medical%20Services%20in%20Urban%20and%20Rural%20Areas&rft.jtitle=AAOHN%20journal&rft.au=Alhazmi,%20Riyadh%20A.&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=73-80&rft.issn=2165-0799&rft.eissn=2165-0969&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2165079919864118&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2309497502%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2334665201&rft_id=info:pmid/31650905&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2165079919864118&rfr_iscdi=true |