Standard Precautions Among Emergency Medical Services in Urban and Rural Areas

Backround: Emergency medical services (EMS) workers are at risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens and frequently exposed to blood and bodily fluids through percutaneous injuries. This study aimed to assess the consistency with which standard precautions (SPs) among rural and urban EMS providers we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AAOHN journal 2020-02, Vol.68 (2), p.73-80
Hauptverfasser: Alhazmi, Riyadh A., Parker, R. David, Wen, Sijin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 80
container_issue 2
container_start_page 73
container_title AAOHN journal
container_volume 68
creator Alhazmi, Riyadh A.
Parker, R. David
Wen, Sijin
description Backround: Emergency medical services (EMS) workers are at risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens and frequently exposed to blood and bodily fluids through percutaneous injuries. This study aimed to assess the consistency with which standard precautions (SPs) among rural and urban EMS providers were used. Methods: This study consisted of a cross-sectional survey conducted with a sample of certified EMS providers in West Virginia in which we ascertained details about sociodemographic characteristics, and the frequency of consistent SP. An email invitation was sent to a comprehensive list of agencies obtained from the Office of West Virginia EMS. Findings: A total of 248 out of 522 (47%) EMS providers completed the survey. The majority of the EMS providers (76%) consistently complied with SPs; however, more than one third (38%) of urban EMS providers indicated inconsistent use compared with 19% of rural EMS providers (p = .002). Most EMS providers reported low prevention practices to exposure of blood and body fluids in both areas. Conclusion/Application to Practice: The results emphasize the need to enhanced safe work practices among EMS providers in both rural and urban areas through education and increasing self-awareness. Occupational health professional in municipalities that serve these workers are instrumental in ensuring these workers are trained and evaluated for their compliance with SPs while in the field.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2165079919864118
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7041279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2165079919864118</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2309497502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3edd02c7db13059eed8fa6326299ab29c22d4eb4110dda2eb22fa96f07a3c1703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoVtS9Kwm4cTOaZGaSZiOU4gvqA7XrkEnu1CmdTE1mBP-9KX2oBbNJyP3OufdwETqh5IJSIS4Z5TkRUlLZ5xml_R10sPhKiORyd_2O9R46DmFK4pFCZnl_H_XShVSS_AA9vrbaWe0tfvZgdNdWjQt4UDdugq9r8BNw5gs_gK2MnuFX8J-VgYArh8e-0A5HMX7pfKwNPOhwhPZKPQtwvLoP0fjm-m14l4yebu-Hg1FiMs7aJAVrCTPCFjQluQSw_VLzlHEmpS6YNIzZDIqYilirGRSMlVrykgidGipIeoiulr7zrqjBGnBtnEHNfVVr_6UaXam_FVe9q0nzqQTJKBMyGpyvDHzz0UFoVV0FA7OZdtB0QbGUyEyKnLCInm2h06bzLsaLVJpxnjNCI0WWlPFNCB7KzTCUqMW-1Pa-ouT0d4iNYL2dCCRLIOgJ_HT91_AbXYecsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2334665201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Standard Precautions Among Emergency Medical Services in Urban and Rural Areas</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Alhazmi, Riyadh A. ; Parker, R. David ; Wen, Sijin</creator><creatorcontrib>Alhazmi, Riyadh A. ; Parker, R. David ; Wen, Sijin</creatorcontrib><description>Backround: Emergency medical services (EMS) workers are at risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens and frequently exposed to blood and bodily fluids through percutaneous injuries. This study aimed to assess the consistency with which standard precautions (SPs) among rural and urban EMS providers were used. Methods: This study consisted of a cross-sectional survey conducted with a sample of certified EMS providers in West Virginia in which we ascertained details about sociodemographic characteristics, and the frequency of consistent SP. An email invitation was sent to a comprehensive list of agencies obtained from the Office of West Virginia EMS. Findings: A total of 248 out of 522 (47%) EMS providers completed the survey. The majority of the EMS providers (76%) consistently complied with SPs; however, more than one third (38%) of urban EMS providers indicated inconsistent use compared with 19% of rural EMS providers (p = .002). Most EMS providers reported low prevention practices to exposure of blood and body fluids in both areas. Conclusion/Application to Practice: The results emphasize the need to enhanced safe work practices among EMS providers in both rural and urban areas through education and increasing self-awareness. Occupational health professional in municipalities that serve these workers are instrumental in ensuring these workers are trained and evaluated for their compliance with SPs while in the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2165-0799</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2165-0969</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2165079919864118</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31650905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accident prevention ; Adult ; Blood ; Blood-Borne Pathogens ; Body fluids ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Medical Services - methods ; Emergency Medical Technicians - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Emergency services ; Exposure ; Female ; Humans ; Infection Control - methods ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Middle Aged ; Municipalities ; Nursing ; Occupational exposure ; Occupational Exposure - prevention &amp; control ; Occupational health ; Outsourcing ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Rural areas ; Rural Population ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Universal Precautions - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Urban areas ; Urban Population ; West Virginia</subject><ispartof>AAOHN journal, 2020-02, Vol.68 (2), p.73-80</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3edd02c7db13059eed8fa6326299ab29c22d4eb4110dda2eb22fa96f07a3c1703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3edd02c7db13059eed8fa6326299ab29c22d4eb4110dda2eb22fa96f07a3c1703</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7084-5645</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2165079919864118$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2165079919864118$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31650905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alhazmi, Riyadh A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, R. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Sijin</creatorcontrib><title>Standard Precautions Among Emergency Medical Services in Urban and Rural Areas</title><title>AAOHN journal</title><addtitle>Workplace Health Saf</addtitle><description>Backround: Emergency medical services (EMS) workers are at risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens and frequently exposed to blood and bodily fluids through percutaneous injuries. This study aimed to assess the consistency with which standard precautions (SPs) among rural and urban EMS providers were used. Methods: This study consisted of a cross-sectional survey conducted with a sample of certified EMS providers in West Virginia in which we ascertained details about sociodemographic characteristics, and the frequency of consistent SP. An email invitation was sent to a comprehensive list of agencies obtained from the Office of West Virginia EMS. Findings: A total of 248 out of 522 (47%) EMS providers completed the survey. The majority of the EMS providers (76%) consistently complied with SPs; however, more than one third (38%) of urban EMS providers indicated inconsistent use compared with 19% of rural EMS providers (p = .002). Most EMS providers reported low prevention practices to exposure of blood and body fluids in both areas. Conclusion/Application to Practice: The results emphasize the need to enhanced safe work practices among EMS providers in both rural and urban areas through education and increasing self-awareness. Occupational health professional in municipalities that serve these workers are instrumental in ensuring these workers are trained and evaluated for their compliance with SPs while in the field.</description><subject>Accident prevention</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood-Borne Pathogens</subject><subject>Body fluids</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - methods</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Technicians - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Outsourcing</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural Population</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Universal Precautions - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban Population</subject><subject>West Virginia</subject><issn>2165-0799</issn><issn>2165-0969</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoVtS9Kwm4cTOaZGaSZiOU4gvqA7XrkEnu1CmdTE1mBP-9KX2oBbNJyP3OufdwETqh5IJSIS4Z5TkRUlLZ5xml_R10sPhKiORyd_2O9R46DmFK4pFCZnl_H_XShVSS_AA9vrbaWe0tfvZgdNdWjQt4UDdugq9r8BNw5gs_gK2MnuFX8J-VgYArh8e-0A5HMX7pfKwNPOhwhPZKPQtwvLoP0fjm-m14l4yebu-Hg1FiMs7aJAVrCTPCFjQluQSw_VLzlHEmpS6YNIzZDIqYilirGRSMlVrykgidGipIeoiulr7zrqjBGnBtnEHNfVVr_6UaXam_FVe9q0nzqQTJKBMyGpyvDHzz0UFoVV0FA7OZdtB0QbGUyEyKnLCInm2h06bzLsaLVJpxnjNCI0WWlPFNCB7KzTCUqMW-1Pa-ouT0d4iNYL2dCCRLIOgJ_HT91_AbXYecsg</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Alhazmi, Riyadh A.</creator><creator>Parker, R. David</creator><creator>Wen, Sijin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7084-5645</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Standard Precautions Among Emergency Medical Services in Urban and Rural Areas</title><author>Alhazmi, Riyadh A. ; Parker, R. David ; Wen, Sijin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-3edd02c7db13059eed8fa6326299ab29c22d4eb4110dda2eb22fa96f07a3c1703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accident prevention</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood-Borne Pathogens</topic><topic>Body fluids</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - methods</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Technicians - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Outsourcing</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural Population</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Universal Precautions - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban Population</topic><topic>West Virginia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alhazmi, Riyadh A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, R. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Sijin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>AAOHN journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alhazmi, Riyadh A.</au><au>Parker, R. David</au><au>Wen, Sijin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Standard Precautions Among Emergency Medical Services in Urban and Rural Areas</atitle><jtitle>AAOHN journal</jtitle><addtitle>Workplace Health Saf</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>80</epage><pages>73-80</pages><issn>2165-0799</issn><eissn>2165-0969</eissn><abstract>Backround: Emergency medical services (EMS) workers are at risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens and frequently exposed to blood and bodily fluids through percutaneous injuries. This study aimed to assess the consistency with which standard precautions (SPs) among rural and urban EMS providers were used. Methods: This study consisted of a cross-sectional survey conducted with a sample of certified EMS providers in West Virginia in which we ascertained details about sociodemographic characteristics, and the frequency of consistent SP. An email invitation was sent to a comprehensive list of agencies obtained from the Office of West Virginia EMS. Findings: A total of 248 out of 522 (47%) EMS providers completed the survey. The majority of the EMS providers (76%) consistently complied with SPs; however, more than one third (38%) of urban EMS providers indicated inconsistent use compared with 19% of rural EMS providers (p = .002). Most EMS providers reported low prevention practices to exposure of blood and body fluids in both areas. Conclusion/Application to Practice: The results emphasize the need to enhanced safe work practices among EMS providers in both rural and urban areas through education and increasing self-awareness. Occupational health professional in municipalities that serve these workers are instrumental in ensuring these workers are trained and evaluated for their compliance with SPs while in the field.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31650905</pmid><doi>10.1177/2165079919864118</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7084-5645</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2165-0799
ispartof AAOHN journal, 2020-02, Vol.68 (2), p.73-80
issn 2165-0799
2165-0969
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7041279
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accident prevention
Adult
Blood
Blood-Borne Pathogens
Body fluids
Cross-Sectional Studies
Emergency medical care
Emergency medical services
Emergency Medical Services - methods
Emergency Medical Technicians - statistics & numerical data
Emergency services
Exposure
Female
Humans
Infection Control - methods
Male
Medical personnel
Middle Aged
Municipalities
Nursing
Occupational exposure
Occupational Exposure - prevention & control
Occupational health
Outsourcing
Polls & surveys
Rural areas
Rural Population
Surveys and Questionnaires
Universal Precautions - statistics & numerical data
Urban areas
Urban Population
West Virginia
title Standard Precautions Among Emergency Medical Services in Urban and Rural Areas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A29%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Standard%20Precautions%20Among%20Emergency%20Medical%20Services%20in%20Urban%20and%20Rural%20Areas&rft.jtitle=AAOHN%20journal&rft.au=Alhazmi,%20Riyadh%20A.&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=80&rft.pages=73-80&rft.issn=2165-0799&rft.eissn=2165-0969&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2165079919864118&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2309497502%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2334665201&rft_id=info:pmid/31650905&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2165079919864118&rfr_iscdi=true