Masseteric-Facial Nerve Anastomosis: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes—A Pilot Indian study

Masseteric-facial anastomosis has gained popularity in recent days compared to the facial–hypoglossal anastomosis. Masseteric nerve has numerous advantages like its proximity to the facial nerve, stronger motor impulse, its reliability, low morbidity in harvesting and sacrificing the nerve and faste...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of otolaryngology, and head, and neck surgery and head, and neck surgery, 2020-03, Vol.72 (1), p.92-97
Hauptverfasser: Sakthivel, Pirabu, Singh, Chirom Amit, Thakar, Alok, Thirumeni, Geeta, Raveendran, Sarath, Sharma, Suresh Chandra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 97
container_issue 1
container_start_page 92
container_title Indian journal of otolaryngology, and head, and neck surgery
container_volume 72
creator Sakthivel, Pirabu
Singh, Chirom Amit
Thakar, Alok
Thirumeni, Geeta
Raveendran, Sarath
Sharma, Suresh Chandra
description Masseteric-facial anastomosis has gained popularity in recent days compared to the facial–hypoglossal anastomosis. Masseteric nerve has numerous advantages like its proximity to the facial nerve, stronger motor impulse, its reliability, low morbidity in harvesting and sacrificing the nerve and faster re-innervation that is achievable in most patients. The present case series demonstrate the surgical technique and the effectiveness of the masseteric nerve as donor for early facial reanimation. Between January 2017 and February 2019, 6 patients (2 male, 4 female) with iatrogenic unilateral complete facial paralysis (grade VI, House Brackmann scale) who underwent masseteric-facial nerve anastomosis were included in the study. The time interval between the onset of paralysis and surgery ranged from 4 to 18 months (mean 8.5 months). In all patients pre-operative electromyography had facial mimetic muscle fibrillation potentials. All patients underwent end to end anastomosis except for one patient where greater auricular interposition graft was used. In all cases, the facial muscles showed earliest sign of recovery at 2–5 months. These movements were first noticed on the cheek musculature when the patients activated their masseter muscle. Eye movements started appearing at 6–9 months (in 3 cases) and forehead movements at 18 months (in 1 case). According to the modified House-Brackmann grading scale, one patient had Grade I function, two patients had Grade II function, and three had Grade V function. There was no morbidity except one patient who underwent interposition graft had numbness in the ear lobule. None of the patients could feel the loss of masseteric nerve function. Masseteric facial nerve anastomosis is a versatile, powerful early facial dynamic reanimation tool with almost negligible morbidity compared to other neurotization procedures for patients with complete facial nerve paralysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12070-019-01758-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7040122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2363169133</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-de166686f87c6afa616721d7600ca03091c58d4306b13545c12b1323bd48432f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EosPAC7BAkdiwSbnXTuyEBdKoolCpUCTKDsnyOM7UVWIX36RSu-IheEKeBE-nlJ8FC8uWznePfXwYe4qwjwDqJSEHBSVgm5eqm_L6HltAq0SpFKj7bMG5wFKoVu6xR0TnAKJGBQ_ZnuBYN1KKBfvy3hC5ySVvy0NjvRmKDy5dumIVDE1xjOTpVfFpThtvs3bq7FnwX2dHhQldcTJPNo6Ofnz7vio--iFOxVHovAkFTXN39Zg96M1A7sntvmSfD9-cHrwrj0_eHh2sjktbqWoqO4dSykb2jbLS9EaiVBw7JQGsAQEt2rrpKgFyjaKuaos8H7hYd1VTCd6LJXu9872Y16PrrAtTMoO-SH406UpH4_XfSvBnehMvtYIKMP_Skr24NUhxG27SoyfrhsEEF2fSXCjJeY3tFn3-D3oe5xRyvExJgbJFITLFd5RNkSi5_u4xCHpbnt6Vp3N5-qY8fZ2Hnv0Z427kV1sZEDuAshQ2Lv2--z-2PwF84aYj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2363169133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Masseteric-Facial Nerve Anastomosis: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes—A Pilot Indian study</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sakthivel, Pirabu ; Singh, Chirom Amit ; Thakar, Alok ; Thirumeni, Geeta ; Raveendran, Sarath ; Sharma, Suresh Chandra</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakthivel, Pirabu ; Singh, Chirom Amit ; Thakar, Alok ; Thirumeni, Geeta ; Raveendran, Sarath ; Sharma, Suresh Chandra</creatorcontrib><description>Masseteric-facial anastomosis has gained popularity in recent days compared to the facial–hypoglossal anastomosis. Masseteric nerve has numerous advantages like its proximity to the facial nerve, stronger motor impulse, its reliability, low morbidity in harvesting and sacrificing the nerve and faster re-innervation that is achievable in most patients. The present case series demonstrate the surgical technique and the effectiveness of the masseteric nerve as donor for early facial reanimation. Between January 2017 and February 2019, 6 patients (2 male, 4 female) with iatrogenic unilateral complete facial paralysis (grade VI, House Brackmann scale) who underwent masseteric-facial nerve anastomosis were included in the study. The time interval between the onset of paralysis and surgery ranged from 4 to 18 months (mean 8.5 months). In all patients pre-operative electromyography had facial mimetic muscle fibrillation potentials. All patients underwent end to end anastomosis except for one patient where greater auricular interposition graft was used. In all cases, the facial muscles showed earliest sign of recovery at 2–5 months. These movements were first noticed on the cheek musculature when the patients activated their masseter muscle. Eye movements started appearing at 6–9 months (in 3 cases) and forehead movements at 18 months (in 1 case). According to the modified House-Brackmann grading scale, one patient had Grade I function, two patients had Grade II function, and three had Grade V function. There was no morbidity except one patient who underwent interposition graft had numbness in the ear lobule. None of the patients could feel the loss of masseteric nerve function. Masseteric facial nerve anastomosis is a versatile, powerful early facial dynamic reanimation tool with almost negligible morbidity compared to other neurotization procedures for patients with complete facial nerve paralysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2231-3796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-7707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12070-019-01758-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32158663</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Head and Neck Surgery ; Maxillofacial surgery ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Morbidity ; Original ; Original Article ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Patients ; Surgical outcomes ; Surgical techniques</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of otolaryngology, and head, and neck surgery, 2020-03, Vol.72 (1), p.92-97</ispartof><rights>Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2019</rights><rights>Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2019.</rights><rights>2019© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-de166686f87c6afa616721d7600ca03091c58d4306b13545c12b1323bd48432f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-de166686f87c6afa616721d7600ca03091c58d4306b13545c12b1323bd48432f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6481-8093 ; 0000-0002-6941-9892</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040122/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7040122/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32158663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakthivel, Pirabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Chirom Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thakar, Alok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thirumeni, Geeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raveendran, Sarath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Suresh Chandra</creatorcontrib><title>Masseteric-Facial Nerve Anastomosis: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes—A Pilot Indian study</title><title>Indian journal of otolaryngology, and head, and neck surgery</title><addtitle>Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><description>Masseteric-facial anastomosis has gained popularity in recent days compared to the facial–hypoglossal anastomosis. Masseteric nerve has numerous advantages like its proximity to the facial nerve, stronger motor impulse, its reliability, low morbidity in harvesting and sacrificing the nerve and faster re-innervation that is achievable in most patients. The present case series demonstrate the surgical technique and the effectiveness of the masseteric nerve as donor for early facial reanimation. Between January 2017 and February 2019, 6 patients (2 male, 4 female) with iatrogenic unilateral complete facial paralysis (grade VI, House Brackmann scale) who underwent masseteric-facial nerve anastomosis were included in the study. The time interval between the onset of paralysis and surgery ranged from 4 to 18 months (mean 8.5 months). In all patients pre-operative electromyography had facial mimetic muscle fibrillation potentials. All patients underwent end to end anastomosis except for one patient where greater auricular interposition graft was used. In all cases, the facial muscles showed earliest sign of recovery at 2–5 months. These movements were first noticed on the cheek musculature when the patients activated their masseter muscle. Eye movements started appearing at 6–9 months (in 3 cases) and forehead movements at 18 months (in 1 case). According to the modified House-Brackmann grading scale, one patient had Grade I function, two patients had Grade II function, and three had Grade V function. There was no morbidity except one patient who underwent interposition graft had numbness in the ear lobule. None of the patients could feel the loss of masseteric nerve function. Masseteric facial nerve anastomosis is a versatile, powerful early facial dynamic reanimation tool with almost negligible morbidity compared to other neurotization procedures for patients with complete facial nerve paralysis.</description><subject>Head and Neck Surgery</subject><subject>Maxillofacial surgery</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Surgical techniques</subject><issn>2231-3796</issn><issn>0973-7707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EosPAC7BAkdiwSbnXTuyEBdKoolCpUCTKDsnyOM7UVWIX36RSu-IheEKeBE-nlJ8FC8uWznePfXwYe4qwjwDqJSEHBSVgm5eqm_L6HltAq0SpFKj7bMG5wFKoVu6xR0TnAKJGBQ_ZnuBYN1KKBfvy3hC5ySVvy0NjvRmKDy5dumIVDE1xjOTpVfFpThtvs3bq7FnwX2dHhQldcTJPNo6Ofnz7vio--iFOxVHovAkFTXN39Zg96M1A7sntvmSfD9-cHrwrj0_eHh2sjktbqWoqO4dSykb2jbLS9EaiVBw7JQGsAQEt2rrpKgFyjaKuaos8H7hYd1VTCd6LJXu9872Y16PrrAtTMoO-SH406UpH4_XfSvBnehMvtYIKMP_Skr24NUhxG27SoyfrhsEEF2fSXCjJeY3tFn3-D3oe5xRyvExJgbJFITLFd5RNkSi5_u4xCHpbnt6Vp3N5-qY8fZ2Hnv0Z427kV1sZEDuAshQ2Lv2--z-2PwF84aYj</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Sakthivel, Pirabu</creator><creator>Singh, Chirom Amit</creator><creator>Thakar, Alok</creator><creator>Thirumeni, Geeta</creator><creator>Raveendran, Sarath</creator><creator>Sharma, Suresh Chandra</creator><general>Springer India</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6481-8093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6941-9892</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Masseteric-Facial Nerve Anastomosis: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes—A Pilot Indian study</title><author>Sakthivel, Pirabu ; Singh, Chirom Amit ; Thakar, Alok ; Thirumeni, Geeta ; Raveendran, Sarath ; Sharma, Suresh Chandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-de166686f87c6afa616721d7600ca03091c58d4306b13545c12b1323bd48432f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Head and Neck Surgery</topic><topic>Maxillofacial surgery</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Surgical techniques</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakthivel, Pirabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Chirom Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thakar, Alok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thirumeni, Geeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raveendran, Sarath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Suresh Chandra</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of otolaryngology, and head, and neck surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakthivel, Pirabu</au><au>Singh, Chirom Amit</au><au>Thakar, Alok</au><au>Thirumeni, Geeta</au><au>Raveendran, Sarath</au><au>Sharma, Suresh Chandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Masseteric-Facial Nerve Anastomosis: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes—A Pilot Indian study</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of otolaryngology, and head, and neck surgery</jtitle><stitle>Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</stitle><addtitle>Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>92</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>92-97</pages><issn>2231-3796</issn><eissn>0973-7707</eissn><abstract>Masseteric-facial anastomosis has gained popularity in recent days compared to the facial–hypoglossal anastomosis. Masseteric nerve has numerous advantages like its proximity to the facial nerve, stronger motor impulse, its reliability, low morbidity in harvesting and sacrificing the nerve and faster re-innervation that is achievable in most patients. The present case series demonstrate the surgical technique and the effectiveness of the masseteric nerve as donor for early facial reanimation. Between January 2017 and February 2019, 6 patients (2 male, 4 female) with iatrogenic unilateral complete facial paralysis (grade VI, House Brackmann scale) who underwent masseteric-facial nerve anastomosis were included in the study. The time interval between the onset of paralysis and surgery ranged from 4 to 18 months (mean 8.5 months). In all patients pre-operative electromyography had facial mimetic muscle fibrillation potentials. All patients underwent end to end anastomosis except for one patient where greater auricular interposition graft was used. In all cases, the facial muscles showed earliest sign of recovery at 2–5 months. These movements were first noticed on the cheek musculature when the patients activated their masseter muscle. Eye movements started appearing at 6–9 months (in 3 cases) and forehead movements at 18 months (in 1 case). According to the modified House-Brackmann grading scale, one patient had Grade I function, two patients had Grade II function, and three had Grade V function. There was no morbidity except one patient who underwent interposition graft had numbness in the ear lobule. None of the patients could feel the loss of masseteric nerve function. Masseteric facial nerve anastomosis is a versatile, powerful early facial dynamic reanimation tool with almost negligible morbidity compared to other neurotization procedures for patients with complete facial nerve paralysis.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>32158663</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12070-019-01758-z</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6481-8093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6941-9892</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2231-3796
ispartof Indian journal of otolaryngology, and head, and neck surgery, 2020-03, Vol.72 (1), p.92-97
issn 2231-3796
0973-7707
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7040122
source PMC (PubMed Central); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Head and Neck Surgery
Maxillofacial surgery
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Morbidity
Original
Original Article
Otorhinolaryngology
Patients
Surgical outcomes
Surgical techniques
title Masseteric-Facial Nerve Anastomosis: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes—A Pilot Indian study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T12%3A39%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Masseteric-Facial%20Nerve%20Anastomosis:%20Surgical%20Techniques%20and%20Outcomes%E2%80%94A%20Pilot%20Indian%20study&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20otolaryngology,%20and%20head,%20and%20neck%20surgery&rft.au=Sakthivel,%20Pirabu&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=92-97&rft.issn=2231-3796&rft.eissn=0973-7707&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12070-019-01758-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2363169133%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2363169133&rft_id=info:pmid/32158663&rfr_iscdi=true