Sex-Specific Differences in Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness

To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings. Population-based cross-sectional study. We investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2020-03, Vol.127 (3), p.357-368
Hauptverfasser: Li, Dian, Rauscher, Franziska G., Choi, Eun Young, Wang, Mengyu, Baniasadi, Neda, Wirkner, Kerstin, Kirsten, Toralf, Thiery, Joachim, Engel, Christoph, Loeffler, Markus, Elze, Tobias
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 368
container_issue 3
container_start_page 357
container_title Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)
container_volume 127
creator Li, Dian
Rauscher, Franziska G.
Choi, Eun Young
Wang, Mengyu
Baniasadi, Neda
Wirkner, Kerstin
Kirsten, Toralf
Thiery, Joachim
Engel, Christoph
Loeffler, Markus
Elze, Tobias
description To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings. Population-based cross-sectional study. We investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult Study of a predominantly white population. All participants underwent standardized systemic assessments and ocular imaging. Circumpapillary RNFL (cRNFL) thickness was measured at 768 points equidistant from the optic nerve head using spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To control ocular magnification effects, the true scanning radius was estimated by scanning focus. Student t test was used to evaluate sex differences in cRNFL thickness globally and at each of the 768 locations. Multivariable linear regression and analysis of variance were used to evaluate individual contributions of various factors to cRNFL thickness variance. Difference in cRNFL thickness between males and females. Our population consisted of 54.8% females. The global cRNFL thickness was 1 μm thicker in females (P < 0.001). However, detailed analysis at each of the 768 locations revealed substantial location specificity of the sex effects, with RNFL thickness difference ranging from –9.98 to +8.00 μm. Females showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the temporal, superotemporal, nasal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal regions (43.6% of 768 locations), whereas males showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the superior region (13.2%). The results were similar after adjusting for age, body height, and scanning radius. The superotemporal and inferotemporal RNFL peaks shifted temporally in females by 2.4° and 1.9°, respectively. On regions with significant sex effects, sex explained more RNFL thickness variance than age, whereas the major peak locations and interpeak angle explained most of the RNFL thickness variance unexplained by sex. Substantial sex effects on cRNFL thickness were found at 56.8% of all 768 circumpapillary locations, with specific patterns for different sectors. Over large regions, sex was at least as important in explaining the cRNFL thickness variance as was age, which is well established to have a substantial impact on cRNFL thickness. Including sex in the cRNFL thickness norm could therefore improve glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7039768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S016164201932086X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2315089435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-794118b8398ae9140e52a2748e8d34842547198d7e290085baaf3035cbdc42d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1P3DAQtVBRWaD_AFU59pLFX0nsS6VqYQFpBRLQs-U4k-5ss0lqJyv23-PVUj4uSCP7MG_ezHuPkDNGp4yy_Hw17frlsLRTTpme0lhMH5AJy6ROZcHEFzKJMJbmktMjchzCilKa50J-JUeCFYJzribk7gGe0oceHNbokgusa_DQOggJtskMvRvXve2xaazfJvcwYGub5Bb8BpI5luCThd3G93GJ7m8LIZySw9o2Ab69_Cfk9_zycXadLu6ubma_FqnLuB7SQkvGVKmEVhY0kxQybnkhFahKSCV5FiVoVRXANaUqK62tBRWZKysnecXECfm55-3Hcg2Vg3bwtjG9x3W81HQWzcdOi0vzp9uYggpd5CoS_Hgh8N2_EcJg1hgcRKEtdGMwXLCMKi1FFqFyD3W-C8FD_bqGUbPLwqzMPguzy8LQWEzHse_vT3wd-m_-mwaIRm0QvAkOd-ZX6MENpurw8w3PLlqc4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2315089435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex-Specific Differences in Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Li, Dian ; Rauscher, Franziska G. ; Choi, Eun Young ; Wang, Mengyu ; Baniasadi, Neda ; Wirkner, Kerstin ; Kirsten, Toralf ; Thiery, Joachim ; Engel, Christoph ; Loeffler, Markus ; Elze, Tobias</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Dian ; Rauscher, Franziska G. ; Choi, Eun Young ; Wang, Mengyu ; Baniasadi, Neda ; Wirkner, Kerstin ; Kirsten, Toralf ; Thiery, Joachim ; Engel, Christoph ; Loeffler, Markus ; Elze, Tobias</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings. Population-based cross-sectional study. We investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult Study of a predominantly white population. All participants underwent standardized systemic assessments and ocular imaging. Circumpapillary RNFL (cRNFL) thickness was measured at 768 points equidistant from the optic nerve head using spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To control ocular magnification effects, the true scanning radius was estimated by scanning focus. Student t test was used to evaluate sex differences in cRNFL thickness globally and at each of the 768 locations. Multivariable linear regression and analysis of variance were used to evaluate individual contributions of various factors to cRNFL thickness variance. Difference in cRNFL thickness between males and females. Our population consisted of 54.8% females. The global cRNFL thickness was 1 μm thicker in females (P &lt; 0.001). However, detailed analysis at each of the 768 locations revealed substantial location specificity of the sex effects, with RNFL thickness difference ranging from –9.98 to +8.00 μm. Females showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the temporal, superotemporal, nasal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal regions (43.6% of 768 locations), whereas males showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the superior region (13.2%). The results were similar after adjusting for age, body height, and scanning radius. The superotemporal and inferotemporal RNFL peaks shifted temporally in females by 2.4° and 1.9°, respectively. On regions with significant sex effects, sex explained more RNFL thickness variance than age, whereas the major peak locations and interpeak angle explained most of the RNFL thickness variance unexplained by sex. Substantial sex effects on cRNFL thickness were found at 56.8% of all 768 circumpapillary locations, with specific patterns for different sectors. Over large regions, sex was at least as important in explaining the cRNFL thickness variance as was age, which is well established to have a substantial impact on cRNFL thickness. Including sex in the cRNFL thickness norm could therefore improve glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31732228</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nerve Fibers ; Retina - anatomy &amp; histology ; Retinal Ganglion Cells ; Sex Factors</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2020-03, Vol.127 (3), p.357-368</ispartof><rights>2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-794118b8398ae9140e52a2748e8d34842547198d7e290085baaf3035cbdc42d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-794118b8398ae9140e52a2748e8d34842547198d7e290085baaf3035cbdc42d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016164201932086X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31732228$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Dian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauscher, Franziska G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Eun Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Mengyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baniasadi, Neda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirkner, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsten, Toralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiery, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engel, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loeffler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elze, Tobias</creatorcontrib><title>Sex-Specific Differences in Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings. Population-based cross-sectional study. We investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult Study of a predominantly white population. All participants underwent standardized systemic assessments and ocular imaging. Circumpapillary RNFL (cRNFL) thickness was measured at 768 points equidistant from the optic nerve head using spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To control ocular magnification effects, the true scanning radius was estimated by scanning focus. Student t test was used to evaluate sex differences in cRNFL thickness globally and at each of the 768 locations. Multivariable linear regression and analysis of variance were used to evaluate individual contributions of various factors to cRNFL thickness variance. Difference in cRNFL thickness between males and females. Our population consisted of 54.8% females. The global cRNFL thickness was 1 μm thicker in females (P &lt; 0.001). However, detailed analysis at each of the 768 locations revealed substantial location specificity of the sex effects, with RNFL thickness difference ranging from –9.98 to +8.00 μm. Females showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the temporal, superotemporal, nasal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal regions (43.6% of 768 locations), whereas males showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the superior region (13.2%). The results were similar after adjusting for age, body height, and scanning radius. The superotemporal and inferotemporal RNFL peaks shifted temporally in females by 2.4° and 1.9°, respectively. On regions with significant sex effects, sex explained more RNFL thickness variance than age, whereas the major peak locations and interpeak angle explained most of the RNFL thickness variance unexplained by sex. Substantial sex effects on cRNFL thickness were found at 56.8% of all 768 circumpapillary locations, with specific patterns for different sectors. Over large regions, sex was at least as important in explaining the cRNFL thickness variance as was age, which is well established to have a substantial impact on cRNFL thickness. Including sex in the cRNFL thickness norm could therefore improve glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Nerve Fibers</subject><subject>Retina - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Retinal Ganglion Cells</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1P3DAQtVBRWaD_AFU59pLFX0nsS6VqYQFpBRLQs-U4k-5ss0lqJyv23-PVUj4uSCP7MG_ezHuPkDNGp4yy_Hw17frlsLRTTpme0lhMH5AJy6ROZcHEFzKJMJbmktMjchzCilKa50J-JUeCFYJzribk7gGe0oceHNbokgusa_DQOggJtskMvRvXve2xaazfJvcwYGub5Bb8BpI5luCThd3G93GJ7m8LIZySw9o2Ab69_Cfk9_zycXadLu6ubma_FqnLuB7SQkvGVKmEVhY0kxQybnkhFahKSCV5FiVoVRXANaUqK62tBRWZKysnecXECfm55-3Hcg2Vg3bwtjG9x3W81HQWzcdOi0vzp9uYggpd5CoS_Hgh8N2_EcJg1hgcRKEtdGMwXLCMKi1FFqFyD3W-C8FD_bqGUbPLwqzMPguzy8LQWEzHse_vT3wd-m_-mwaIRm0QvAkOd-ZX6MENpurw8w3PLlqc4Q</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Li, Dian</creator><creator>Rauscher, Franziska G.</creator><creator>Choi, Eun Young</creator><creator>Wang, Mengyu</creator><creator>Baniasadi, Neda</creator><creator>Wirkner, Kerstin</creator><creator>Kirsten, Toralf</creator><creator>Thiery, Joachim</creator><creator>Engel, Christoph</creator><creator>Loeffler, Markus</creator><creator>Elze, Tobias</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Sex-Specific Differences in Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness</title><author>Li, Dian ; Rauscher, Franziska G. ; Choi, Eun Young ; Wang, Mengyu ; Baniasadi, Neda ; Wirkner, Kerstin ; Kirsten, Toralf ; Thiery, Joachim ; Engel, Christoph ; Loeffler, Markus ; Elze, Tobias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-794118b8398ae9140e52a2748e8d34842547198d7e290085baaf3035cbdc42d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Nerve Fibers</topic><topic>Retina - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Retinal Ganglion Cells</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Dian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauscher, Franziska G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Eun Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Mengyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baniasadi, Neda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirkner, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsten, Toralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiery, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engel, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loeffler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elze, Tobias</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Dian</au><au>Rauscher, Franziska G.</au><au>Choi, Eun Young</au><au>Wang, Mengyu</au><au>Baniasadi, Neda</au><au>Wirkner, Kerstin</au><au>Kirsten, Toralf</au><au>Thiery, Joachim</au><au>Engel, Christoph</au><au>Loeffler, Markus</au><au>Elze, Tobias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex-Specific Differences in Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>357</spage><epage>368</epage><pages>357-368</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><abstract>To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings. Population-based cross-sectional study. We investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult Study of a predominantly white population. All participants underwent standardized systemic assessments and ocular imaging. Circumpapillary RNFL (cRNFL) thickness was measured at 768 points equidistant from the optic nerve head using spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To control ocular magnification effects, the true scanning radius was estimated by scanning focus. Student t test was used to evaluate sex differences in cRNFL thickness globally and at each of the 768 locations. Multivariable linear regression and analysis of variance were used to evaluate individual contributions of various factors to cRNFL thickness variance. Difference in cRNFL thickness between males and females. Our population consisted of 54.8% females. The global cRNFL thickness was 1 μm thicker in females (P &lt; 0.001). However, detailed analysis at each of the 768 locations revealed substantial location specificity of the sex effects, with RNFL thickness difference ranging from –9.98 to +8.00 μm. Females showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the temporal, superotemporal, nasal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal regions (43.6% of 768 locations), whereas males showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the superior region (13.2%). The results were similar after adjusting for age, body height, and scanning radius. The superotemporal and inferotemporal RNFL peaks shifted temporally in females by 2.4° and 1.9°, respectively. On regions with significant sex effects, sex explained more RNFL thickness variance than age, whereas the major peak locations and interpeak angle explained most of the RNFL thickness variance unexplained by sex. Substantial sex effects on cRNFL thickness were found at 56.8% of all 768 circumpapillary locations, with specific patterns for different sectors. Over large regions, sex was at least as important in explaining the cRNFL thickness variance as was age, which is well established to have a substantial impact on cRNFL thickness. Including sex in the cRNFL thickness norm could therefore improve glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31732228</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.019</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-6420
ispartof Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2020-03, Vol.127 (3), p.357-368
issn 0161-6420
1549-4713
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7039768
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Analysis of Variance
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Nerve Fibers
Retina - anatomy & histology
Retinal Ganglion Cells
Sex Factors
title Sex-Specific Differences in Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A54%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex-Specific%20Differences%20in%20Circumpapillary%20Retinal%20Nerve%20Fiber%20Layer%20Thickness&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20Minn.)&rft.au=Li,%20Dian&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=357&rft.epage=368&rft.pages=357-368&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2315089435%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2315089435&rft_id=info:pmid/31732228&rft_els_id=S016164201932086X&rfr_iscdi=true