Sex-Specific Differences in Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness
To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings. Population-based cross-sectional study. We investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2020-03, Vol.127 (3), p.357-368 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 368 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 357 |
container_title | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) |
container_volume | 127 |
creator | Li, Dian Rauscher, Franziska G. Choi, Eun Young Wang, Mengyu Baniasadi, Neda Wirkner, Kerstin Kirsten, Toralf Thiery, Joachim Engel, Christoph Loeffler, Markus Elze, Tobias |
description | To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings.
Population-based cross-sectional study.
We investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult Study of a predominantly white population.
All participants underwent standardized systemic assessments and ocular imaging. Circumpapillary RNFL (cRNFL) thickness was measured at 768 points equidistant from the optic nerve head using spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To control ocular magnification effects, the true scanning radius was estimated by scanning focus. Student t test was used to evaluate sex differences in cRNFL thickness globally and at each of the 768 locations. Multivariable linear regression and analysis of variance were used to evaluate individual contributions of various factors to cRNFL thickness variance.
Difference in cRNFL thickness between males and females.
Our population consisted of 54.8% females. The global cRNFL thickness was 1 μm thicker in females (P < 0.001). However, detailed analysis at each of the 768 locations revealed substantial location specificity of the sex effects, with RNFL thickness difference ranging from –9.98 to +8.00 μm. Females showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the temporal, superotemporal, nasal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal regions (43.6% of 768 locations), whereas males showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the superior region (13.2%). The results were similar after adjusting for age, body height, and scanning radius. The superotemporal and inferotemporal RNFL peaks shifted temporally in females by 2.4° and 1.9°, respectively. On regions with significant sex effects, sex explained more RNFL thickness variance than age, whereas the major peak locations and interpeak angle explained most of the RNFL thickness variance unexplained by sex.
Substantial sex effects on cRNFL thickness were found at 56.8% of all 768 circumpapillary locations, with specific patterns for different sectors. Over large regions, sex was at least as important in explaining the cRNFL thickness variance as was age, which is well established to have a substantial impact on cRNFL thickness. Including sex in the cRNFL thickness norm could therefore improve glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7039768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S016164201932086X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2315089435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-794118b8398ae9140e52a2748e8d34842547198d7e290085baaf3035cbdc42d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1P3DAQtVBRWaD_AFU59pLFX0nsS6VqYQFpBRLQs-U4k-5ss0lqJyv23-PVUj4uSCP7MG_ezHuPkDNGp4yy_Hw17frlsLRTTpme0lhMH5AJy6ROZcHEFzKJMJbmktMjchzCilKa50J-JUeCFYJzribk7gGe0oceHNbokgusa_DQOggJtskMvRvXve2xaazfJvcwYGub5Bb8BpI5luCThd3G93GJ7m8LIZySw9o2Ab69_Cfk9_zycXadLu6ubma_FqnLuB7SQkvGVKmEVhY0kxQybnkhFahKSCV5FiVoVRXANaUqK62tBRWZKysnecXECfm55-3Hcg2Vg3bwtjG9x3W81HQWzcdOi0vzp9uYggpd5CoS_Hgh8N2_EcJg1hgcRKEtdGMwXLCMKi1FFqFyD3W-C8FD_bqGUbPLwqzMPguzy8LQWEzHse_vT3wd-m_-mwaIRm0QvAkOd-ZX6MENpurw8w3PLlqc4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2315089435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex-Specific Differences in Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Li, Dian ; Rauscher, Franziska G. ; Choi, Eun Young ; Wang, Mengyu ; Baniasadi, Neda ; Wirkner, Kerstin ; Kirsten, Toralf ; Thiery, Joachim ; Engel, Christoph ; Loeffler, Markus ; Elze, Tobias</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Dian ; Rauscher, Franziska G. ; Choi, Eun Young ; Wang, Mengyu ; Baniasadi, Neda ; Wirkner, Kerstin ; Kirsten, Toralf ; Thiery, Joachim ; Engel, Christoph ; Loeffler, Markus ; Elze, Tobias</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings.
Population-based cross-sectional study.
We investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult Study of a predominantly white population.
All participants underwent standardized systemic assessments and ocular imaging. Circumpapillary RNFL (cRNFL) thickness was measured at 768 points equidistant from the optic nerve head using spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To control ocular magnification effects, the true scanning radius was estimated by scanning focus. Student t test was used to evaluate sex differences in cRNFL thickness globally and at each of the 768 locations. Multivariable linear regression and analysis of variance were used to evaluate individual contributions of various factors to cRNFL thickness variance.
Difference in cRNFL thickness between males and females.
Our population consisted of 54.8% females. The global cRNFL thickness was 1 μm thicker in females (P < 0.001). However, detailed analysis at each of the 768 locations revealed substantial location specificity of the sex effects, with RNFL thickness difference ranging from –9.98 to +8.00 μm. Females showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the temporal, superotemporal, nasal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal regions (43.6% of 768 locations), whereas males showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the superior region (13.2%). The results were similar after adjusting for age, body height, and scanning radius. The superotemporal and inferotemporal RNFL peaks shifted temporally in females by 2.4° and 1.9°, respectively. On regions with significant sex effects, sex explained more RNFL thickness variance than age, whereas the major peak locations and interpeak angle explained most of the RNFL thickness variance unexplained by sex.
Substantial sex effects on cRNFL thickness were found at 56.8% of all 768 circumpapillary locations, with specific patterns for different sectors. Over large regions, sex was at least as important in explaining the cRNFL thickness variance as was age, which is well established to have a substantial impact on cRNFL thickness. Including sex in the cRNFL thickness norm could therefore improve glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31732228</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Nerve Fibers ; Retina - anatomy & histology ; Retinal Ganglion Cells ; Sex Factors</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2020-03, Vol.127 (3), p.357-368</ispartof><rights>2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-794118b8398ae9140e52a2748e8d34842547198d7e290085baaf3035cbdc42d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-794118b8398ae9140e52a2748e8d34842547198d7e290085baaf3035cbdc42d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016164201932086X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31732228$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Dian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauscher, Franziska G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Eun Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Mengyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baniasadi, Neda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirkner, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsten, Toralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiery, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engel, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loeffler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elze, Tobias</creatorcontrib><title>Sex-Specific Differences in Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings.
Population-based cross-sectional study.
We investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult Study of a predominantly white population.
All participants underwent standardized systemic assessments and ocular imaging. Circumpapillary RNFL (cRNFL) thickness was measured at 768 points equidistant from the optic nerve head using spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To control ocular magnification effects, the true scanning radius was estimated by scanning focus. Student t test was used to evaluate sex differences in cRNFL thickness globally and at each of the 768 locations. Multivariable linear regression and analysis of variance were used to evaluate individual contributions of various factors to cRNFL thickness variance.
Difference in cRNFL thickness between males and females.
Our population consisted of 54.8% females. The global cRNFL thickness was 1 μm thicker in females (P < 0.001). However, detailed analysis at each of the 768 locations revealed substantial location specificity of the sex effects, with RNFL thickness difference ranging from –9.98 to +8.00 μm. Females showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the temporal, superotemporal, nasal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal regions (43.6% of 768 locations), whereas males showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the superior region (13.2%). The results were similar after adjusting for age, body height, and scanning radius. The superotemporal and inferotemporal RNFL peaks shifted temporally in females by 2.4° and 1.9°, respectively. On regions with significant sex effects, sex explained more RNFL thickness variance than age, whereas the major peak locations and interpeak angle explained most of the RNFL thickness variance unexplained by sex.
Substantial sex effects on cRNFL thickness were found at 56.8% of all 768 circumpapillary locations, with specific patterns for different sectors. Over large regions, sex was at least as important in explaining the cRNFL thickness variance as was age, which is well established to have a substantial impact on cRNFL thickness. Including sex in the cRNFL thickness norm could therefore improve glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Nerve Fibers</subject><subject>Retina - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Retinal Ganglion Cells</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1P3DAQtVBRWaD_AFU59pLFX0nsS6VqYQFpBRLQs-U4k-5ss0lqJyv23-PVUj4uSCP7MG_ezHuPkDNGp4yy_Hw17frlsLRTTpme0lhMH5AJy6ROZcHEFzKJMJbmktMjchzCilKa50J-JUeCFYJzribk7gGe0oceHNbokgusa_DQOggJtskMvRvXve2xaazfJvcwYGub5Bb8BpI5luCThd3G93GJ7m8LIZySw9o2Ab69_Cfk9_zycXadLu6ubma_FqnLuB7SQkvGVKmEVhY0kxQybnkhFahKSCV5FiVoVRXANaUqK62tBRWZKysnecXECfm55-3Hcg2Vg3bwtjG9x3W81HQWzcdOi0vzp9uYggpd5CoS_Hgh8N2_EcJg1hgcRKEtdGMwXLCMKi1FFqFyD3W-C8FD_bqGUbPLwqzMPguzy8LQWEzHse_vT3wd-m_-mwaIRm0QvAkOd-ZX6MENpurw8w3PLlqc4Q</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Li, Dian</creator><creator>Rauscher, Franziska G.</creator><creator>Choi, Eun Young</creator><creator>Wang, Mengyu</creator><creator>Baniasadi, Neda</creator><creator>Wirkner, Kerstin</creator><creator>Kirsten, Toralf</creator><creator>Thiery, Joachim</creator><creator>Engel, Christoph</creator><creator>Loeffler, Markus</creator><creator>Elze, Tobias</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Sex-Specific Differences in Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness</title><author>Li, Dian ; Rauscher, Franziska G. ; Choi, Eun Young ; Wang, Mengyu ; Baniasadi, Neda ; Wirkner, Kerstin ; Kirsten, Toralf ; Thiery, Joachim ; Engel, Christoph ; Loeffler, Markus ; Elze, Tobias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-794118b8398ae9140e52a2748e8d34842547198d7e290085baaf3035cbdc42d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Nerve Fibers</topic><topic>Retina - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Retinal Ganglion Cells</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Dian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauscher, Franziska G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Eun Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Mengyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baniasadi, Neda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirkner, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsten, Toralf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiery, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engel, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loeffler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elze, Tobias</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Dian</au><au>Rauscher, Franziska G.</au><au>Choi, Eun Young</au><au>Wang, Mengyu</au><au>Baniasadi, Neda</au><au>Wirkner, Kerstin</au><au>Kirsten, Toralf</au><au>Thiery, Joachim</au><au>Engel, Christoph</au><au>Loeffler, Markus</au><au>Elze, Tobias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex-Specific Differences in Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>357</spage><epage>368</epage><pages>357-368</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><abstract>To investigate the role of sex on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 768 circumpapillary locations based on OCT findings.
Population-based cross-sectional study.
We investigated 5646 eyes of 5646 healthy participants from the Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases (LIFE)-Adult Study of a predominantly white population.
All participants underwent standardized systemic assessments and ocular imaging. Circumpapillary RNFL (cRNFL) thickness was measured at 768 points equidistant from the optic nerve head using spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). To control ocular magnification effects, the true scanning radius was estimated by scanning focus. Student t test was used to evaluate sex differences in cRNFL thickness globally and at each of the 768 locations. Multivariable linear regression and analysis of variance were used to evaluate individual contributions of various factors to cRNFL thickness variance.
Difference in cRNFL thickness between males and females.
Our population consisted of 54.8% females. The global cRNFL thickness was 1 μm thicker in females (P < 0.001). However, detailed analysis at each of the 768 locations revealed substantial location specificity of the sex effects, with RNFL thickness difference ranging from –9.98 to +8.00 μm. Females showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the temporal, superotemporal, nasal, inferonasal, and inferotemporal regions (43.6% of 768 locations), whereas males showed significantly thicker RNFLs in the superior region (13.2%). The results were similar after adjusting for age, body height, and scanning radius. The superotemporal and inferotemporal RNFL peaks shifted temporally in females by 2.4° and 1.9°, respectively. On regions with significant sex effects, sex explained more RNFL thickness variance than age, whereas the major peak locations and interpeak angle explained most of the RNFL thickness variance unexplained by sex.
Substantial sex effects on cRNFL thickness were found at 56.8% of all 768 circumpapillary locations, with specific patterns for different sectors. Over large regions, sex was at least as important in explaining the cRNFL thickness variance as was age, which is well established to have a substantial impact on cRNFL thickness. Including sex in the cRNFL thickness norm could therefore improve glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31732228</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.019</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-6420 |
ispartof | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2020-03, Vol.127 (3), p.357-368 |
issn | 0161-6420 1549-4713 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7039768 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Cross-Sectional Studies Female Humans Male Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Nerve Fibers Retina - anatomy & histology Retinal Ganglion Cells Sex Factors |
title | Sex-Specific Differences in Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A54%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex-Specific%20Differences%20in%20Circumpapillary%20Retinal%20Nerve%20Fiber%20Layer%20Thickness&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20Minn.)&rft.au=Li,%20Dian&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=357&rft.epage=368&rft.pages=357-368&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2315089435%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2315089435&rft_id=info:pmid/31732228&rft_els_id=S016164201932086X&rfr_iscdi=true |