Prospective use of the single-mouse experimental design for the evaluation of PLX038A
Purpose Defining robust criteria for drug activity in preclinical studies allows for fewer animals per treatment group, and potentially allows for inclusion of additional cancer models that more accurately represent genetic diversity and, potentially, allows for tumor sensitivity biomarker identific...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 2020-02, Vol.85 (2), p.251-263 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 263 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 251 |
container_title | Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Ghilu, Samson Li, Qilin Fontaine, Shaun D. Santi, Daniel V. Kurmasheva, Raushan T. Zheng, Siyuan Houghton, Peter J. |
description | Purpose
Defining robust criteria for drug activity in preclinical studies allows for fewer animals per treatment group, and potentially allows for inclusion of additional cancer models that more accurately represent genetic diversity and, potentially, allows for tumor sensitivity biomarker identification.
Methods
Using a single-mouse design, 32 pediatric xenograft tumor models representing diverse pediatric cancer types [Ewing sarcoma (9), brain (4), rhabdomyosarcoma (10), Wilms tumor (4), and non-CNS rhabdoid tumors (5)] were evaluated for response to a single administration of pegylated-SN38 (PLX038A), a controlled-release PEGylated formulation of SN-38. Endpoints measured were percent tumor regression, and event-free survival (EFS). The correlation between response to PLX038A was compared to that for ten models treated with irinotecan (2.5 mg/kg × 5 days × 2 cycles), using a traditional design (10 mice/group). Correlations between tumor sensitivity, genetic mutations and gene expression were sought. Models showing no disease at week 20 were categorized as ‘extreme responders’ to PLX038A, whereas those with EFS less than 5 weeks were categorized as ‘resistant’.
Results
The activity of PLX038A was evaluable in 31/32 models. PLX038A induced > 50% volume regressions in 25 models (78%). Initial tumor volume regression correlated only modestly with EFS (
r
2
= 0.238), but sensitivity to PLX038A was better correlated with response to irinotecan when one tumor hypersensitive to PLX038A was omitted (
r
2
= 0.6844). Mutations in
53BP1
were observed in three of six sensitive tumor models compared to none in resistant models (
n
= 6).
Conclusions
This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a single-mouse design for assessing the antitumor activity of an agent, while encompassing greater genetic diversity representative of childhood cancers. PLX038A was highly active in most xenograft models, and tumor sensitivity to PLX038A was correlated with sensitivity to irinotecan, validating the single-mouse design in identifying agents with the same mechanism of action. Biomarkers that correlated with model sensitivity included wild-type
TP53
, or mutant
TP53
but with a mutation in
53BP1
, thus a defect in DNA damage response. These results support the value of the single-mouse experimental design. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00280-019-04017-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7039322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2353921236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-ae071da772213c8ecbfbef9ebfa4402910d207dafd0af3a5632877422ac10c0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9PGzEQxS1EBSntF-CAVuLCxe3Y48S7l0oogrZSpHIoEjfL6x2HRZt1au9G8O1xCH9KD5UPljy_efPGj7FjAV8EgP6aAGQJHETFQYHQvNxjE6FQcigV7rMJoFJ8qkEdso8p3QGAEogH7BBFJfVMiAm7voohrckN7YaKMVERfDHcUpHaftkRX4XtG92vKbYr6gfbFQ2ldtkXPsQnkDa2G-3Qhn7berW4ASzPP7EP3naJPj_fR-z68uL3_Adf_Pr-c36-4E5pNXBLoEVjtZZSoCvJ1b4mX1HtrVIgKwGNBN1Y34D1aKczlKXWSkrrBDio8Yh92-mux3pFjcsOo-3MOpu18cEE25r3lb69NcuwMRqwQimzwNmzQAx_RkqDWbXJUdfZnvLqRiJq2B7M6Ok_6F0YY5_Xy9QUKykkzjIld5TL_5oi-VczAsw2NbNLzeTUzFNqpsxNJ3-v8dryElMGcAekXOqXFN9m_0f2EYLYovo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2353921236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective use of the single-mouse experimental design for the evaluation of PLX038A</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Ghilu, Samson ; Li, Qilin ; Fontaine, Shaun D. ; Santi, Daniel V. ; Kurmasheva, Raushan T. ; Zheng, Siyuan ; Houghton, Peter J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghilu, Samson ; Li, Qilin ; Fontaine, Shaun D. ; Santi, Daniel V. ; Kurmasheva, Raushan T. ; Zheng, Siyuan ; Houghton, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Defining robust criteria for drug activity in preclinical studies allows for fewer animals per treatment group, and potentially allows for inclusion of additional cancer models that more accurately represent genetic diversity and, potentially, allows for tumor sensitivity biomarker identification.
Methods
Using a single-mouse design, 32 pediatric xenograft tumor models representing diverse pediatric cancer types [Ewing sarcoma (9), brain (4), rhabdomyosarcoma (10), Wilms tumor (4), and non-CNS rhabdoid tumors (5)] were evaluated for response to a single administration of pegylated-SN38 (PLX038A), a controlled-release PEGylated formulation of SN-38. Endpoints measured were percent tumor regression, and event-free survival (EFS). The correlation between response to PLX038A was compared to that for ten models treated with irinotecan (2.5 mg/kg × 5 days × 2 cycles), using a traditional design (10 mice/group). Correlations between tumor sensitivity, genetic mutations and gene expression were sought. Models showing no disease at week 20 were categorized as ‘extreme responders’ to PLX038A, whereas those with EFS less than 5 weeks were categorized as ‘resistant’.
Results
The activity of PLX038A was evaluable in 31/32 models. PLX038A induced > 50% volume regressions in 25 models (78%). Initial tumor volume regression correlated only modestly with EFS (
r
2
= 0.238), but sensitivity to PLX038A was better correlated with response to irinotecan when one tumor hypersensitive to PLX038A was omitted (
r
2
= 0.6844). Mutations in
53BP1
were observed in three of six sensitive tumor models compared to none in resistant models (
n
= 6).
Conclusions
This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a single-mouse design for assessing the antitumor activity of an agent, while encompassing greater genetic diversity representative of childhood cancers. PLX038A was highly active in most xenograft models, and tumor sensitivity to PLX038A was correlated with sensitivity to irinotecan, validating the single-mouse design in identifying agents with the same mechanism of action. Biomarkers that correlated with model sensitivity included wild-type
TP53
, or mutant
TP53
but with a mutation in
53BP1
, thus a defect in DNA damage response. These results support the value of the single-mouse experimental design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0344-5704</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1432-0843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-04017-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31927611</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anticancer properties ; Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology ; Antitumor activity ; Biomarkers ; Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism ; Cancer ; Cancer Research ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Children ; Controlled release ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Design of experiments ; Disease Models, Animal ; DNA ; DNA damage ; DNA Damage - drug effects ; Drug development ; Evaluation ; Ewing's sarcoma ; Experimental design ; Feasibility studies ; Female ; Gene expression ; Genetic diversity ; Identification methods ; Irinotecan ; Irinotecan - pharmacology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mice ; Mice, SCID ; Mutants ; Mutation ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Oncology ; Original Article ; p53 Protein ; Pediatrics ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Prospective Studies ; Regression analysis ; Research Design ; Rhabdomyosarcoma ; Sarcoma ; Sensitivity ; Tumor Burden - drug effects ; Tumors ; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods ; Xenografts ; Xenotransplantation</subject><ispartof>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2020-02, Vol.85 (2), p.251-263</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-ae071da772213c8ecbfbef9ebfa4402910d207dafd0af3a5632877422ac10c0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-ae071da772213c8ecbfbef9ebfa4402910d207dafd0af3a5632877422ac10c0b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00280-019-04017-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00280-019-04017-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31927611$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghilu, Samson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, Shaun D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santi, Daniel V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurmasheva, Raushan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Siyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houghton, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective use of the single-mouse experimental design for the evaluation of PLX038A</title><title>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology</title><addtitle>Cancer Chemother Pharmacol</addtitle><addtitle>Cancer Chemother Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Purpose
Defining robust criteria for drug activity in preclinical studies allows for fewer animals per treatment group, and potentially allows for inclusion of additional cancer models that more accurately represent genetic diversity and, potentially, allows for tumor sensitivity biomarker identification.
Methods
Using a single-mouse design, 32 pediatric xenograft tumor models representing diverse pediatric cancer types [Ewing sarcoma (9), brain (4), rhabdomyosarcoma (10), Wilms tumor (4), and non-CNS rhabdoid tumors (5)] were evaluated for response to a single administration of pegylated-SN38 (PLX038A), a controlled-release PEGylated formulation of SN-38. Endpoints measured were percent tumor regression, and event-free survival (EFS). The correlation between response to PLX038A was compared to that for ten models treated with irinotecan (2.5 mg/kg × 5 days × 2 cycles), using a traditional design (10 mice/group). Correlations between tumor sensitivity, genetic mutations and gene expression were sought. Models showing no disease at week 20 were categorized as ‘extreme responders’ to PLX038A, whereas those with EFS less than 5 weeks were categorized as ‘resistant’.
Results
The activity of PLX038A was evaluable in 31/32 models. PLX038A induced > 50% volume regressions in 25 models (78%). Initial tumor volume regression correlated only modestly with EFS (
r
2
= 0.238), but sensitivity to PLX038A was better correlated with response to irinotecan when one tumor hypersensitive to PLX038A was omitted (
r
2
= 0.6844). Mutations in
53BP1
were observed in three of six sensitive tumor models compared to none in resistant models (
n
= 6).
Conclusions
This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a single-mouse design for assessing the antitumor activity of an agent, while encompassing greater genetic diversity representative of childhood cancers. PLX038A was highly active in most xenograft models, and tumor sensitivity to PLX038A was correlated with sensitivity to irinotecan, validating the single-mouse design in identifying agents with the same mechanism of action. Biomarkers that correlated with model sensitivity included wild-type
TP53
, or mutant
TP53
but with a mutation in
53BP1
, thus a defect in DNA damage response. These results support the value of the single-mouse experimental design.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anticancer properties</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antitumor activity</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Cell Line, Tumor</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Controlled release</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA damage</subject><subject>DNA Damage - drug effects</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Ewing's sarcoma</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Irinotecan</subject><subject>Irinotecan - pharmacology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, SCID</subject><subject>Mutants</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>p53 Protein</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Rhabdomyosarcoma</subject><subject>Sarcoma</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Tumor Burden - drug effects</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods</subject><subject>Xenografts</subject><subject>Xenotransplantation</subject><issn>0344-5704</issn><issn>1432-0843</issn><issn>1432-0843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9PGzEQxS1EBSntF-CAVuLCxe3Y48S7l0oogrZSpHIoEjfL6x2HRZt1au9G8O1xCH9KD5UPljy_efPGj7FjAV8EgP6aAGQJHETFQYHQvNxjE6FQcigV7rMJoFJ8qkEdso8p3QGAEogH7BBFJfVMiAm7voohrckN7YaKMVERfDHcUpHaftkRX4XtG92vKbYr6gfbFQ2ldtkXPsQnkDa2G-3Qhn7berW4ASzPP7EP3naJPj_fR-z68uL3_Adf_Pr-c36-4E5pNXBLoEVjtZZSoCvJ1b4mX1HtrVIgKwGNBN1Y34D1aKczlKXWSkrrBDio8Yh92-mux3pFjcsOo-3MOpu18cEE25r3lb69NcuwMRqwQimzwNmzQAx_RkqDWbXJUdfZnvLqRiJq2B7M6Ok_6F0YY5_Xy9QUKykkzjIld5TL_5oi-VczAsw2NbNLzeTUzFNqpsxNJ3-v8dryElMGcAekXOqXFN9m_0f2EYLYovo</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Ghilu, Samson</creator><creator>Li, Qilin</creator><creator>Fontaine, Shaun D.</creator><creator>Santi, Daniel V.</creator><creator>Kurmasheva, Raushan T.</creator><creator>Zheng, Siyuan</creator><creator>Houghton, Peter J.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Prospective use of the single-mouse experimental design for the evaluation of PLX038A</title><author>Ghilu, Samson ; Li, Qilin ; Fontaine, Shaun D. ; Santi, Daniel V. ; Kurmasheva, Raushan T. ; Zheng, Siyuan ; Houghton, Peter J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-ae071da772213c8ecbfbef9ebfa4402910d207dafd0af3a5632877422ac10c0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anticancer properties</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antitumor activity</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Cell Line, Tumor</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Controlled release</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA damage</topic><topic>DNA Damage - drug effects</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Ewing's sarcoma</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Irinotecan</topic><topic>Irinotecan - pharmacology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, SCID</topic><topic>Mutants</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>p53 Protein</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Rhabdomyosarcoma</topic><topic>Sarcoma</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Tumor Burden - drug effects</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods</topic><topic>Xenografts</topic><topic>Xenotransplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghilu, Samson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, Shaun D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santi, Daniel V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurmasheva, Raushan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Siyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houghton, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghilu, Samson</au><au>Li, Qilin</au><au>Fontaine, Shaun D.</au><au>Santi, Daniel V.</au><au>Kurmasheva, Raushan T.</au><au>Zheng, Siyuan</au><au>Houghton, Peter J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective use of the single-mouse experimental design for the evaluation of PLX038A</atitle><jtitle>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology</jtitle><stitle>Cancer Chemother Pharmacol</stitle><addtitle>Cancer Chemother Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>251-263</pages><issn>0344-5704</issn><issn>1432-0843</issn><eissn>1432-0843</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Defining robust criteria for drug activity in preclinical studies allows for fewer animals per treatment group, and potentially allows for inclusion of additional cancer models that more accurately represent genetic diversity and, potentially, allows for tumor sensitivity biomarker identification.
Methods
Using a single-mouse design, 32 pediatric xenograft tumor models representing diverse pediatric cancer types [Ewing sarcoma (9), brain (4), rhabdomyosarcoma (10), Wilms tumor (4), and non-CNS rhabdoid tumors (5)] were evaluated for response to a single administration of pegylated-SN38 (PLX038A), a controlled-release PEGylated formulation of SN-38. Endpoints measured were percent tumor regression, and event-free survival (EFS). The correlation between response to PLX038A was compared to that for ten models treated with irinotecan (2.5 mg/kg × 5 days × 2 cycles), using a traditional design (10 mice/group). Correlations between tumor sensitivity, genetic mutations and gene expression were sought. Models showing no disease at week 20 were categorized as ‘extreme responders’ to PLX038A, whereas those with EFS less than 5 weeks were categorized as ‘resistant’.
Results
The activity of PLX038A was evaluable in 31/32 models. PLX038A induced > 50% volume regressions in 25 models (78%). Initial tumor volume regression correlated only modestly with EFS (
r
2
= 0.238), but sensitivity to PLX038A was better correlated with response to irinotecan when one tumor hypersensitive to PLX038A was omitted (
r
2
= 0.6844). Mutations in
53BP1
were observed in three of six sensitive tumor models compared to none in resistant models (
n
= 6).
Conclusions
This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a single-mouse design for assessing the antitumor activity of an agent, while encompassing greater genetic diversity representative of childhood cancers. PLX038A was highly active in most xenograft models, and tumor sensitivity to PLX038A was correlated with sensitivity to irinotecan, validating the single-mouse design in identifying agents with the same mechanism of action. Biomarkers that correlated with model sensitivity included wild-type
TP53
, or mutant
TP53
but with a mutation in
53BP1
, thus a defect in DNA damage response. These results support the value of the single-mouse experimental design.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31927611</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00280-019-04017-8</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0344-5704 |
ispartof | Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2020-02, Vol.85 (2), p.251-263 |
issn | 0344-5704 1432-0843 1432-0843 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7039322 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Animals Anticancer properties Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology Antitumor activity Biomarkers Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism Cancer Cancer Research Cell Line, Tumor Children Controlled release Deoxyribonucleic acid Design of experiments Disease Models, Animal DNA DNA damage DNA Damage - drug effects Drug development Evaluation Ewing's sarcoma Experimental design Feasibility studies Female Gene expression Genetic diversity Identification methods Irinotecan Irinotecan - pharmacology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mice Mice, SCID Mutants Mutation Neoplasms - drug therapy Oncology Original Article p53 Protein Pediatrics Pharmacology/Toxicology Prospective Studies Regression analysis Research Design Rhabdomyosarcoma Sarcoma Sensitivity Tumor Burden - drug effects Tumors Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods Xenografts Xenotransplantation |
title | Prospective use of the single-mouse experimental design for the evaluation of PLX038A |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A37%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20use%20of%20the%20single-mouse%20experimental%20design%20for%20the%20evaluation%20of%20PLX038A&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20chemotherapy%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=Ghilu,%20Samson&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=251-263&rft.issn=0344-5704&rft.eissn=1432-0843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00280-019-04017-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2353921236%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2353921236&rft_id=info:pmid/31927611&rfr_iscdi=true |