Prospective use of the single-mouse experimental design for the evaluation of PLX038A

Purpose Defining robust criteria for drug activity in preclinical studies allows for fewer animals per treatment group, and potentially allows for inclusion of additional cancer models that more accurately represent genetic diversity and, potentially, allows for tumor sensitivity biomarker identific...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 2020-02, Vol.85 (2), p.251-263
Hauptverfasser: Ghilu, Samson, Li, Qilin, Fontaine, Shaun D., Santi, Daniel V., Kurmasheva, Raushan T., Zheng, Siyuan, Houghton, Peter J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 263
container_issue 2
container_start_page 251
container_title Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology
container_volume 85
creator Ghilu, Samson
Li, Qilin
Fontaine, Shaun D.
Santi, Daniel V.
Kurmasheva, Raushan T.
Zheng, Siyuan
Houghton, Peter J.
description Purpose Defining robust criteria for drug activity in preclinical studies allows for fewer animals per treatment group, and potentially allows for inclusion of additional cancer models that more accurately represent genetic diversity and, potentially, allows for tumor sensitivity biomarker identification. Methods Using a single-mouse design, 32 pediatric xenograft tumor models representing diverse pediatric cancer types [Ewing sarcoma (9), brain (4), rhabdomyosarcoma (10), Wilms tumor (4), and non-CNS rhabdoid tumors (5)] were evaluated for response to a single administration of pegylated-SN38 (PLX038A), a controlled-release PEGylated formulation of SN-38. Endpoints measured were percent tumor regression, and event-free survival (EFS). The correlation between response to PLX038A was compared to that for ten models treated with irinotecan (2.5 mg/kg × 5 days × 2 cycles), using a traditional design (10 mice/group). Correlations between tumor sensitivity, genetic mutations and gene expression were sought. Models showing no disease at week 20 were categorized as ‘extreme responders’ to PLX038A, whereas those with EFS less than 5 weeks were categorized as ‘resistant’. Results The activity of PLX038A was evaluable in 31/32 models. PLX038A induced > 50% volume regressions in 25 models (78%). Initial tumor volume regression correlated only modestly with EFS ( r 2  = 0.238), but sensitivity to PLX038A was better correlated with response to irinotecan when one tumor hypersensitive to PLX038A was omitted ( r 2  = 0.6844). Mutations in 53BP1 were observed in three of six sensitive tumor models compared to none in resistant models ( n  = 6). Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a single-mouse design for assessing the antitumor activity of an agent, while encompassing greater genetic diversity representative of childhood cancers. PLX038A was highly active in most xenograft models, and tumor sensitivity to PLX038A was correlated with sensitivity to irinotecan, validating the single-mouse design in identifying agents with the same mechanism of action. Biomarkers that correlated with model sensitivity included wild-type TP53 , or mutant TP53 but with a mutation in 53BP1 , thus a defect in DNA damage response. These results support the value of the single-mouse experimental design.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00280-019-04017-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7039322</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2353921236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-ae071da772213c8ecbfbef9ebfa4402910d207dafd0af3a5632877422ac10c0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9PGzEQxS1EBSntF-CAVuLCxe3Y48S7l0oogrZSpHIoEjfL6x2HRZt1au9G8O1xCH9KD5UPljy_efPGj7FjAV8EgP6aAGQJHETFQYHQvNxjE6FQcigV7rMJoFJ8qkEdso8p3QGAEogH7BBFJfVMiAm7voohrckN7YaKMVERfDHcUpHaftkRX4XtG92vKbYr6gfbFQ2ldtkXPsQnkDa2G-3Qhn7berW4ASzPP7EP3naJPj_fR-z68uL3_Adf_Pr-c36-4E5pNXBLoEVjtZZSoCvJ1b4mX1HtrVIgKwGNBN1Y34D1aKczlKXWSkrrBDio8Yh92-mux3pFjcsOo-3MOpu18cEE25r3lb69NcuwMRqwQimzwNmzQAx_RkqDWbXJUdfZnvLqRiJq2B7M6Ok_6F0YY5_Xy9QUKykkzjIld5TL_5oi-VczAsw2NbNLzeTUzFNqpsxNJ3-v8dryElMGcAekXOqXFN9m_0f2EYLYovo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2353921236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective use of the single-mouse experimental design for the evaluation of PLX038A</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Ghilu, Samson ; Li, Qilin ; Fontaine, Shaun D. ; Santi, Daniel V. ; Kurmasheva, Raushan T. ; Zheng, Siyuan ; Houghton, Peter J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghilu, Samson ; Li, Qilin ; Fontaine, Shaun D. ; Santi, Daniel V. ; Kurmasheva, Raushan T. ; Zheng, Siyuan ; Houghton, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Defining robust criteria for drug activity in preclinical studies allows for fewer animals per treatment group, and potentially allows for inclusion of additional cancer models that more accurately represent genetic diversity and, potentially, allows for tumor sensitivity biomarker identification. Methods Using a single-mouse design, 32 pediatric xenograft tumor models representing diverse pediatric cancer types [Ewing sarcoma (9), brain (4), rhabdomyosarcoma (10), Wilms tumor (4), and non-CNS rhabdoid tumors (5)] were evaluated for response to a single administration of pegylated-SN38 (PLX038A), a controlled-release PEGylated formulation of SN-38. Endpoints measured were percent tumor regression, and event-free survival (EFS). The correlation between response to PLX038A was compared to that for ten models treated with irinotecan (2.5 mg/kg × 5 days × 2 cycles), using a traditional design (10 mice/group). Correlations between tumor sensitivity, genetic mutations and gene expression were sought. Models showing no disease at week 20 were categorized as ‘extreme responders’ to PLX038A, whereas those with EFS less than 5 weeks were categorized as ‘resistant’. Results The activity of PLX038A was evaluable in 31/32 models. PLX038A induced &gt; 50% volume regressions in 25 models (78%). Initial tumor volume regression correlated only modestly with EFS ( r 2  = 0.238), but sensitivity to PLX038A was better correlated with response to irinotecan when one tumor hypersensitive to PLX038A was omitted ( r 2  = 0.6844). Mutations in 53BP1 were observed in three of six sensitive tumor models compared to none in resistant models ( n  = 6). Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a single-mouse design for assessing the antitumor activity of an agent, while encompassing greater genetic diversity representative of childhood cancers. PLX038A was highly active in most xenograft models, and tumor sensitivity to PLX038A was correlated with sensitivity to irinotecan, validating the single-mouse design in identifying agents with the same mechanism of action. Biomarkers that correlated with model sensitivity included wild-type TP53 , or mutant TP53 but with a mutation in 53BP1 , thus a defect in DNA damage response. These results support the value of the single-mouse experimental design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0344-5704</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1432-0843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-04017-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31927611</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anticancer properties ; Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology ; Antitumor activity ; Biomarkers ; Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism ; Cancer ; Cancer Research ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Children ; Controlled release ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Design of experiments ; Disease Models, Animal ; DNA ; DNA damage ; DNA Damage - drug effects ; Drug development ; Evaluation ; Ewing's sarcoma ; Experimental design ; Feasibility studies ; Female ; Gene expression ; Genetic diversity ; Identification methods ; Irinotecan ; Irinotecan - pharmacology ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mice ; Mice, SCID ; Mutants ; Mutation ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Oncology ; Original Article ; p53 Protein ; Pediatrics ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Prospective Studies ; Regression analysis ; Research Design ; Rhabdomyosarcoma ; Sarcoma ; Sensitivity ; Tumor Burden - drug effects ; Tumors ; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods ; Xenografts ; Xenotransplantation</subject><ispartof>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2020-02, Vol.85 (2), p.251-263</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-ae071da772213c8ecbfbef9ebfa4402910d207dafd0af3a5632877422ac10c0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-ae071da772213c8ecbfbef9ebfa4402910d207dafd0af3a5632877422ac10c0b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00280-019-04017-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00280-019-04017-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31927611$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghilu, Samson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, Shaun D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santi, Daniel V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurmasheva, Raushan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Siyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houghton, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective use of the single-mouse experimental design for the evaluation of PLX038A</title><title>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology</title><addtitle>Cancer Chemother Pharmacol</addtitle><addtitle>Cancer Chemother Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Purpose Defining robust criteria for drug activity in preclinical studies allows for fewer animals per treatment group, and potentially allows for inclusion of additional cancer models that more accurately represent genetic diversity and, potentially, allows for tumor sensitivity biomarker identification. Methods Using a single-mouse design, 32 pediatric xenograft tumor models representing diverse pediatric cancer types [Ewing sarcoma (9), brain (4), rhabdomyosarcoma (10), Wilms tumor (4), and non-CNS rhabdoid tumors (5)] were evaluated for response to a single administration of pegylated-SN38 (PLX038A), a controlled-release PEGylated formulation of SN-38. Endpoints measured were percent tumor regression, and event-free survival (EFS). The correlation between response to PLX038A was compared to that for ten models treated with irinotecan (2.5 mg/kg × 5 days × 2 cycles), using a traditional design (10 mice/group). Correlations between tumor sensitivity, genetic mutations and gene expression were sought. Models showing no disease at week 20 were categorized as ‘extreme responders’ to PLX038A, whereas those with EFS less than 5 weeks were categorized as ‘resistant’. Results The activity of PLX038A was evaluable in 31/32 models. PLX038A induced &gt; 50% volume regressions in 25 models (78%). Initial tumor volume regression correlated only modestly with EFS ( r 2  = 0.238), but sensitivity to PLX038A was better correlated with response to irinotecan when one tumor hypersensitive to PLX038A was omitted ( r 2  = 0.6844). Mutations in 53BP1 were observed in three of six sensitive tumor models compared to none in resistant models ( n  = 6). Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a single-mouse design for assessing the antitumor activity of an agent, while encompassing greater genetic diversity representative of childhood cancers. PLX038A was highly active in most xenograft models, and tumor sensitivity to PLX038A was correlated with sensitivity to irinotecan, validating the single-mouse design in identifying agents with the same mechanism of action. Biomarkers that correlated with model sensitivity included wild-type TP53 , or mutant TP53 but with a mutation in 53BP1 , thus a defect in DNA damage response. These results support the value of the single-mouse experimental design.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anticancer properties</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antitumor activity</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Cell Line, Tumor</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Controlled release</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA damage</subject><subject>DNA Damage - drug effects</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Ewing's sarcoma</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Irinotecan</subject><subject>Irinotecan - pharmacology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, SCID</subject><subject>Mutants</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>p53 Protein</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Rhabdomyosarcoma</subject><subject>Sarcoma</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Tumor Burden - drug effects</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods</subject><subject>Xenografts</subject><subject>Xenotransplantation</subject><issn>0344-5704</issn><issn>1432-0843</issn><issn>1432-0843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9PGzEQxS1EBSntF-CAVuLCxe3Y48S7l0oogrZSpHIoEjfL6x2HRZt1au9G8O1xCH9KD5UPljy_efPGj7FjAV8EgP6aAGQJHETFQYHQvNxjE6FQcigV7rMJoFJ8qkEdso8p3QGAEogH7BBFJfVMiAm7voohrckN7YaKMVERfDHcUpHaftkRX4XtG92vKbYr6gfbFQ2ldtkXPsQnkDa2G-3Qhn7berW4ASzPP7EP3naJPj_fR-z68uL3_Adf_Pr-c36-4E5pNXBLoEVjtZZSoCvJ1b4mX1HtrVIgKwGNBN1Y34D1aKczlKXWSkrrBDio8Yh92-mux3pFjcsOo-3MOpu18cEE25r3lb69NcuwMRqwQimzwNmzQAx_RkqDWbXJUdfZnvLqRiJq2B7M6Ok_6F0YY5_Xy9QUKykkzjIld5TL_5oi-VczAsw2NbNLzeTUzFNqpsxNJ3-v8dryElMGcAekXOqXFN9m_0f2EYLYovo</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Ghilu, Samson</creator><creator>Li, Qilin</creator><creator>Fontaine, Shaun D.</creator><creator>Santi, Daniel V.</creator><creator>Kurmasheva, Raushan T.</creator><creator>Zheng, Siyuan</creator><creator>Houghton, Peter J.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Prospective use of the single-mouse experimental design for the evaluation of PLX038A</title><author>Ghilu, Samson ; Li, Qilin ; Fontaine, Shaun D. ; Santi, Daniel V. ; Kurmasheva, Raushan T. ; Zheng, Siyuan ; Houghton, Peter J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-ae071da772213c8ecbfbef9ebfa4402910d207dafd0af3a5632877422ac10c0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anticancer properties</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antitumor activity</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Cell Line, Tumor</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Controlled release</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA damage</topic><topic>DNA Damage - drug effects</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Ewing's sarcoma</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Irinotecan</topic><topic>Irinotecan - pharmacology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, SCID</topic><topic>Mutants</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>p53 Protein</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Rhabdomyosarcoma</topic><topic>Sarcoma</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Tumor Burden - drug effects</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods</topic><topic>Xenografts</topic><topic>Xenotransplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghilu, Samson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, Shaun D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santi, Daniel V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurmasheva, Raushan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Siyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houghton, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghilu, Samson</au><au>Li, Qilin</au><au>Fontaine, Shaun D.</au><au>Santi, Daniel V.</au><au>Kurmasheva, Raushan T.</au><au>Zheng, Siyuan</au><au>Houghton, Peter J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective use of the single-mouse experimental design for the evaluation of PLX038A</atitle><jtitle>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology</jtitle><stitle>Cancer Chemother Pharmacol</stitle><addtitle>Cancer Chemother Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>251-263</pages><issn>0344-5704</issn><issn>1432-0843</issn><eissn>1432-0843</eissn><abstract>Purpose Defining robust criteria for drug activity in preclinical studies allows for fewer animals per treatment group, and potentially allows for inclusion of additional cancer models that more accurately represent genetic diversity and, potentially, allows for tumor sensitivity biomarker identification. Methods Using a single-mouse design, 32 pediatric xenograft tumor models representing diverse pediatric cancer types [Ewing sarcoma (9), brain (4), rhabdomyosarcoma (10), Wilms tumor (4), and non-CNS rhabdoid tumors (5)] were evaluated for response to a single administration of pegylated-SN38 (PLX038A), a controlled-release PEGylated formulation of SN-38. Endpoints measured were percent tumor regression, and event-free survival (EFS). The correlation between response to PLX038A was compared to that for ten models treated with irinotecan (2.5 mg/kg × 5 days × 2 cycles), using a traditional design (10 mice/group). Correlations between tumor sensitivity, genetic mutations and gene expression were sought. Models showing no disease at week 20 were categorized as ‘extreme responders’ to PLX038A, whereas those with EFS less than 5 weeks were categorized as ‘resistant’. Results The activity of PLX038A was evaluable in 31/32 models. PLX038A induced &gt; 50% volume regressions in 25 models (78%). Initial tumor volume regression correlated only modestly with EFS ( r 2  = 0.238), but sensitivity to PLX038A was better correlated with response to irinotecan when one tumor hypersensitive to PLX038A was omitted ( r 2  = 0.6844). Mutations in 53BP1 were observed in three of six sensitive tumor models compared to none in resistant models ( n  = 6). Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility of using a single-mouse design for assessing the antitumor activity of an agent, while encompassing greater genetic diversity representative of childhood cancers. PLX038A was highly active in most xenograft models, and tumor sensitivity to PLX038A was correlated with sensitivity to irinotecan, validating the single-mouse design in identifying agents with the same mechanism of action. Biomarkers that correlated with model sensitivity included wild-type TP53 , or mutant TP53 but with a mutation in 53BP1 , thus a defect in DNA damage response. These results support the value of the single-mouse experimental design.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31927611</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00280-019-04017-8</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0344-5704
ispartof Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2020-02, Vol.85 (2), p.251-263
issn 0344-5704
1432-0843
1432-0843
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7039322
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Animals
Anticancer properties
Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology
Antitumor activity
Biomarkers
Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism
Cancer
Cancer Research
Cell Line, Tumor
Children
Controlled release
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Design of experiments
Disease Models, Animal
DNA
DNA damage
DNA Damage - drug effects
Drug development
Evaluation
Ewing's sarcoma
Experimental design
Feasibility studies
Female
Gene expression
Genetic diversity
Identification methods
Irinotecan
Irinotecan - pharmacology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mice
Mice, SCID
Mutants
Mutation
Neoplasms - drug therapy
Oncology
Original Article
p53 Protein
Pediatrics
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Prospective Studies
Regression analysis
Research Design
Rhabdomyosarcoma
Sarcoma
Sensitivity
Tumor Burden - drug effects
Tumors
Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays - methods
Xenografts
Xenotransplantation
title Prospective use of the single-mouse experimental design for the evaluation of PLX038A
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A37%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20use%20of%20the%20single-mouse%20experimental%20design%20for%20the%20evaluation%20of%20PLX038A&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20chemotherapy%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=Ghilu,%20Samson&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=251-263&rft.issn=0344-5704&rft.eissn=1432-0843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00280-019-04017-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2353921236%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2353921236&rft_id=info:pmid/31927611&rfr_iscdi=true