Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs arm and hand function largely by interrupting descending tracts. Most SCI spare some axons at the lesion, including the corticospinal tract (CST), which is critical for voluntary movement. We targeted descending motor connections with paired electrical stimu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental neurology 2019-10, Vol.320, p.112962-112962, Article 112962
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Qi, Ramamurthy, Aditya, Lall, Sophia, Santos, Joshua, Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan, Lopane, Madeleine, Zareen, Neela, Alexander, Heather, Ryan, Daniel, Martin, John H., Carmel, Jason B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 112962
container_issue
container_start_page 112962
container_title Experimental neurology
container_volume 320
creator Yang, Qi
Ramamurthy, Aditya
Lall, Sophia
Santos, Joshua
Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan
Lopane, Madeleine
Zareen, Neela
Alexander, Heather
Ryan, Daniel
Martin, John H.
Carmel, Jason B.
description Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs arm and hand function largely by interrupting descending tracts. Most SCI spare some axons at the lesion, including the corticospinal tract (CST), which is critical for voluntary movement. We targeted descending motor connections with paired electrical stimulation of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord in the rat. We sought to replicate the previously published effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of forelimb motor cortex combined with trans-spinal direct current stimulation placed on the skin over the neck to target the cervical enlargement. We hypothesized that paired stimulation would improve performance in skilled walking and food manipulation (IBB) tasks. Rats received a moderate C4 spinal cord contusion injury (200 kDynes), which ablates the main CST. They were randomized to receive paired stimulation for 10 consecutive days starting 11 days after injury, or no stimulation. Behavior was assessed weekly from weeks 4–7 after injury, and then CST axons were traced. Rats with paired cortical and spinal stimulation achieved significantly better forelimb motor function recovery, as measured by fewer stepping errors on the horizontal ladder task (34 ± 9% in stimulation group vs. 51 ± 18% in control, p = .013) and higher scores on the food manipulation task (IBB, 0–9 score; 7.2 ± 0.8 in stimulated rats vs. 5.2 ± 2.6 in controls, p = .025). The effect size for both tasks was large (Cohen's d = 1.0 and 0.92, respectively). The CST axon length in the cervical spinal cord did not differ significantly between the groups, but there was denser and broader ipsilateral axons distribution distal to the spinal cord injury. The large behavioral effect and replication in an independent laboratory validate this approach, which will be trialed in cats before being tested in people using non-invasive methods. [Display omitted] •Paired motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation improved forelimb function after SCI.•This replicates the original study in an independent laboratory.•Stimulation promoted axons density in the spinal cord below the injury•Validation of individual methods before the study may have aided the replication.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.112962
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7035596</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0014488619301086</els_id><sourcerecordid>2232098780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-dc674e53aeefc932a340c7ea54e104e24ed986c329fbf425e1eedd45b62dea753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcuOFCEUJUbjtKO_oCzddAsU1GNjMpn4mGQSN7omNNxSOhSUF6oz8y3-rIzVdpyVG07Cedybewh5w9mOM96-O-zgbo6wYAo7wfiw41wMrXhCNpwNbCtkw56SDWNcbmXftxfkRc4HxtggRfecXDRVrpTsN-TXTXQwQ31ioQhz8NYUnyJNI51SSUhtwgJ31ERHLeCx8oHm2ccKlXIUAtiC63fx0xJWf0l0xlQjgI4JIfhpfwocl2j_SMxYAB9l-XhY8L4CRVPyS_JsNCHDqxNekm8fP3y9_ry9_fLp5vrqdmuV5GXrbNtJUI0BGO3QCNNIZjswSgJnEoQEN_StbcQw7kcpFHAA56Tat8KB6VRzSd6vufOyn8DZego0Qc_oJ4P3OhmvHzPR_9Df01F3rFFqaGvA21MApp8L5KInny2EYCKkJWshGsGGvutZlXar1GLKGWE8j-FMP1SrD_pcrX6oVq_VVufrf7c8-_52WQVXqwDqrY4eUGfrIVpwHmtF2iX_3yG_AYRCwLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2232098780</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Yang, Qi ; Ramamurthy, Aditya ; Lall, Sophia ; Santos, Joshua ; Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan ; Lopane, Madeleine ; Zareen, Neela ; Alexander, Heather ; Ryan, Daniel ; Martin, John H. ; Carmel, Jason B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qi ; Ramamurthy, Aditya ; Lall, Sophia ; Santos, Joshua ; Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan ; Lopane, Madeleine ; Zareen, Neela ; Alexander, Heather ; Ryan, Daniel ; Martin, John H. ; Carmel, Jason B.</creatorcontrib><description>Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs arm and hand function largely by interrupting descending tracts. Most SCI spare some axons at the lesion, including the corticospinal tract (CST), which is critical for voluntary movement. We targeted descending motor connections with paired electrical stimulation of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord in the rat. We sought to replicate the previously published effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of forelimb motor cortex combined with trans-spinal direct current stimulation placed on the skin over the neck to target the cervical enlargement. We hypothesized that paired stimulation would improve performance in skilled walking and food manipulation (IBB) tasks. Rats received a moderate C4 spinal cord contusion injury (200 kDynes), which ablates the main CST. They were randomized to receive paired stimulation for 10 consecutive days starting 11 days after injury, or no stimulation. Behavior was assessed weekly from weeks 4–7 after injury, and then CST axons were traced. Rats with paired cortical and spinal stimulation achieved significantly better forelimb motor function recovery, as measured by fewer stepping errors on the horizontal ladder task (34 ± 9% in stimulation group vs. 51 ± 18% in control, p = .013) and higher scores on the food manipulation task (IBB, 0–9 score; 7.2 ± 0.8 in stimulated rats vs. 5.2 ± 2.6 in controls, p = .025). The effect size for both tasks was large (Cohen's d = 1.0 and 0.92, respectively). The CST axon length in the cervical spinal cord did not differ significantly between the groups, but there was denser and broader ipsilateral axons distribution distal to the spinal cord injury. The large behavioral effect and replication in an independent laboratory validate this approach, which will be trialed in cats before being tested in people using non-invasive methods. [Display omitted] •Paired motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation improved forelimb function after SCI.•This replicates the original study in an independent laboratory.•Stimulation promoted axons density in the spinal cord below the injury•Validation of individual methods before the study may have aided the replication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4886</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2430</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.112962</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31125548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cervical Cord - physiopathology ; Corticospinal ; Direct current stimulation ; Double-Blind Method ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Electrical stimulation ; Forelimb ; iTBS ; Motor Activity - physiology ; Motor cortex ; Motor Cortex - physiopathology ; Motor recovery ; Rats ; Recovery of Function - physiology ; Spinal cord ; Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology ; Spinal cord injury ; Transcutaneous</subject><ispartof>Experimental neurology, 2019-10, Vol.320, p.112962-112962, Article 112962</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-dc674e53aeefc932a340c7ea54e104e24ed986c329fbf425e1eedd45b62dea753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-dc674e53aeefc932a340c7ea54e104e24ed986c329fbf425e1eedd45b62dea753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.112962$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramamurthy, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lall, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopane, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zareen, Neela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmel, Jason B.</creatorcontrib><title>Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats</title><title>Experimental neurology</title><addtitle>Exp Neurol</addtitle><description>Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs arm and hand function largely by interrupting descending tracts. Most SCI spare some axons at the lesion, including the corticospinal tract (CST), which is critical for voluntary movement. We targeted descending motor connections with paired electrical stimulation of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord in the rat. We sought to replicate the previously published effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of forelimb motor cortex combined with trans-spinal direct current stimulation placed on the skin over the neck to target the cervical enlargement. We hypothesized that paired stimulation would improve performance in skilled walking and food manipulation (IBB) tasks. Rats received a moderate C4 spinal cord contusion injury (200 kDynes), which ablates the main CST. They were randomized to receive paired stimulation for 10 consecutive days starting 11 days after injury, or no stimulation. Behavior was assessed weekly from weeks 4–7 after injury, and then CST axons were traced. Rats with paired cortical and spinal stimulation achieved significantly better forelimb motor function recovery, as measured by fewer stepping errors on the horizontal ladder task (34 ± 9% in stimulation group vs. 51 ± 18% in control, p = .013) and higher scores on the food manipulation task (IBB, 0–9 score; 7.2 ± 0.8 in stimulated rats vs. 5.2 ± 2.6 in controls, p = .025). The effect size for both tasks was large (Cohen's d = 1.0 and 0.92, respectively). The CST axon length in the cervical spinal cord did not differ significantly between the groups, but there was denser and broader ipsilateral axons distribution distal to the spinal cord injury. The large behavioral effect and replication in an independent laboratory validate this approach, which will be trialed in cats before being tested in people using non-invasive methods. [Display omitted] •Paired motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation improved forelimb function after SCI.•This replicates the original study in an independent laboratory.•Stimulation promoted axons density in the spinal cord below the injury•Validation of individual methods before the study may have aided the replication.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cervical Cord - physiopathology</subject><subject>Corticospinal</subject><subject>Direct current stimulation</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Electrical stimulation</subject><subject>Forelimb</subject><subject>iTBS</subject><subject>Motor Activity - physiology</subject><subject>Motor cortex</subject><subject>Motor Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>Motor recovery</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Recovery of Function - physiology</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spinal cord injury</subject><subject>Transcutaneous</subject><issn>0014-4886</issn><issn>1090-2430</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUcuOFCEUJUbjtKO_oCzddAsU1GNjMpn4mGQSN7omNNxSOhSUF6oz8y3-rIzVdpyVG07Cedybewh5w9mOM96-O-zgbo6wYAo7wfiw41wMrXhCNpwNbCtkw56SDWNcbmXftxfkRc4HxtggRfecXDRVrpTsN-TXTXQwQ31ioQhz8NYUnyJNI51SSUhtwgJ31ERHLeCx8oHm2ccKlXIUAtiC63fx0xJWf0l0xlQjgI4JIfhpfwocl2j_SMxYAB9l-XhY8L4CRVPyS_JsNCHDqxNekm8fP3y9_ry9_fLp5vrqdmuV5GXrbNtJUI0BGO3QCNNIZjswSgJnEoQEN_StbcQw7kcpFHAA56Tat8KB6VRzSd6vufOyn8DZego0Qc_oJ4P3OhmvHzPR_9Df01F3rFFqaGvA21MApp8L5KInny2EYCKkJWshGsGGvutZlXar1GLKGWE8j-FMP1SrD_pcrX6oVq_VVufrf7c8-_52WQVXqwDqrY4eUGfrIVpwHmtF2iX_3yG_AYRCwLQ</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Yang, Qi</creator><creator>Ramamurthy, Aditya</creator><creator>Lall, Sophia</creator><creator>Santos, Joshua</creator><creator>Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan</creator><creator>Lopane, Madeleine</creator><creator>Zareen, Neela</creator><creator>Alexander, Heather</creator><creator>Ryan, Daniel</creator><creator>Martin, John H.</creator><creator>Carmel, Jason B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats</title><author>Yang, Qi ; Ramamurthy, Aditya ; Lall, Sophia ; Santos, Joshua ; Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan ; Lopane, Madeleine ; Zareen, Neela ; Alexander, Heather ; Ryan, Daniel ; Martin, John H. ; Carmel, Jason B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-dc674e53aeefc932a340c7ea54e104e24ed986c329fbf425e1eedd45b62dea753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cervical Cord - physiopathology</topic><topic>Corticospinal</topic><topic>Direct current stimulation</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Electrical stimulation</topic><topic>Forelimb</topic><topic>iTBS</topic><topic>Motor Activity - physiology</topic><topic>Motor cortex</topic><topic>Motor Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>Motor recovery</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Recovery of Function - physiology</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spinal cord injury</topic><topic>Transcutaneous</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramamurthy, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lall, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopane, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zareen, Neela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmel, Jason B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Experimental neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Qi</au><au>Ramamurthy, Aditya</au><au>Lall, Sophia</au><au>Santos, Joshua</au><au>Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan</au><au>Lopane, Madeleine</au><au>Zareen, Neela</au><au>Alexander, Heather</au><au>Ryan, Daniel</au><au>Martin, John H.</au><au>Carmel, Jason B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats</atitle><jtitle>Experimental neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Neurol</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>320</volume><spage>112962</spage><epage>112962</epage><pages>112962-112962</pages><artnum>112962</artnum><issn>0014-4886</issn><eissn>1090-2430</eissn><abstract>Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs arm and hand function largely by interrupting descending tracts. Most SCI spare some axons at the lesion, including the corticospinal tract (CST), which is critical for voluntary movement. We targeted descending motor connections with paired electrical stimulation of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord in the rat. We sought to replicate the previously published effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of forelimb motor cortex combined with trans-spinal direct current stimulation placed on the skin over the neck to target the cervical enlargement. We hypothesized that paired stimulation would improve performance in skilled walking and food manipulation (IBB) tasks. Rats received a moderate C4 spinal cord contusion injury (200 kDynes), which ablates the main CST. They were randomized to receive paired stimulation for 10 consecutive days starting 11 days after injury, or no stimulation. Behavior was assessed weekly from weeks 4–7 after injury, and then CST axons were traced. Rats with paired cortical and spinal stimulation achieved significantly better forelimb motor function recovery, as measured by fewer stepping errors on the horizontal ladder task (34 ± 9% in stimulation group vs. 51 ± 18% in control, p = .013) and higher scores on the food manipulation task (IBB, 0–9 score; 7.2 ± 0.8 in stimulated rats vs. 5.2 ± 2.6 in controls, p = .025). The effect size for both tasks was large (Cohen's d = 1.0 and 0.92, respectively). The CST axon length in the cervical spinal cord did not differ significantly between the groups, but there was denser and broader ipsilateral axons distribution distal to the spinal cord injury. The large behavioral effect and replication in an independent laboratory validate this approach, which will be trialed in cats before being tested in people using non-invasive methods. [Display omitted] •Paired motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation improved forelimb function after SCI.•This replicates the original study in an independent laboratory.•Stimulation promoted axons density in the spinal cord below the injury•Validation of individual methods before the study may have aided the replication.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31125548</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.112962</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-4886
ispartof Experimental neurology, 2019-10, Vol.320, p.112962-112962, Article 112962
issn 0014-4886
1090-2430
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7035596
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animals
Cervical Cord - physiopathology
Corticospinal
Direct current stimulation
Double-Blind Method
Electric Stimulation - methods
Electrical stimulation
Forelimb
iTBS
Motor Activity - physiology
Motor cortex
Motor Cortex - physiopathology
Motor recovery
Rats
Recovery of Function - physiology
Spinal cord
Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology
Spinal cord injury
Transcutaneous
title Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A27%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Independent%20replication%20of%20motor%20cortex%20and%20cervical%20spinal%20cord%20electrical%20stimulation%20to%20promote%20forelimb%20motor%20function%20after%20spinal%20cord%20injury%20in%20rats&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20neurology&rft.au=Yang,%20Qi&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=320&rft.spage=112962&rft.epage=112962&rft.pages=112962-112962&rft.artnum=112962&rft.issn=0014-4886&rft.eissn=1090-2430&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.112962&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2232098780%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2232098780&rft_id=info:pmid/31125548&rft_els_id=S0014488619301086&rfr_iscdi=true