Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats
Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs arm and hand function largely by interrupting descending tracts. Most SCI spare some axons at the lesion, including the corticospinal tract (CST), which is critical for voluntary movement. We targeted descending motor connections with paired electrical stimu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental neurology 2019-10, Vol.320, p.112962-112962, Article 112962 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 112962 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 112962 |
container_title | Experimental neurology |
container_volume | 320 |
creator | Yang, Qi Ramamurthy, Aditya Lall, Sophia Santos, Joshua Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan Lopane, Madeleine Zareen, Neela Alexander, Heather Ryan, Daniel Martin, John H. Carmel, Jason B. |
description | Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs arm and hand function largely by interrupting descending tracts. Most SCI spare some axons at the lesion, including the corticospinal tract (CST), which is critical for voluntary movement. We targeted descending motor connections with paired electrical stimulation of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord in the rat. We sought to replicate the previously published effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of forelimb motor cortex combined with trans-spinal direct current stimulation placed on the skin over the neck to target the cervical enlargement. We hypothesized that paired stimulation would improve performance in skilled walking and food manipulation (IBB) tasks. Rats received a moderate C4 spinal cord contusion injury (200 kDynes), which ablates the main CST. They were randomized to receive paired stimulation for 10 consecutive days starting 11 days after injury, or no stimulation. Behavior was assessed weekly from weeks 4–7 after injury, and then CST axons were traced. Rats with paired cortical and spinal stimulation achieved significantly better forelimb motor function recovery, as measured by fewer stepping errors on the horizontal ladder task (34 ± 9% in stimulation group vs. 51 ± 18% in control, p = .013) and higher scores on the food manipulation task (IBB, 0–9 score; 7.2 ± 0.8 in stimulated rats vs. 5.2 ± 2.6 in controls, p = .025). The effect size for both tasks was large (Cohen's d = 1.0 and 0.92, respectively). The CST axon length in the cervical spinal cord did not differ significantly between the groups, but there was denser and broader ipsilateral axons distribution distal to the spinal cord injury. The large behavioral effect and replication in an independent laboratory validate this approach, which will be trialed in cats before being tested in people using non-invasive methods.
[Display omitted]
•Paired motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation improved forelimb function after SCI.•This replicates the original study in an independent laboratory.•Stimulation promoted axons density in the spinal cord below the injury•Validation of individual methods before the study may have aided the replication. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.112962 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7035596</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0014488619301086</els_id><sourcerecordid>2232098780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-dc674e53aeefc932a340c7ea54e104e24ed986c329fbf425e1eedd45b62dea753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcuOFCEUJUbjtKO_oCzddAsU1GNjMpn4mGQSN7omNNxSOhSUF6oz8y3-rIzVdpyVG07Cedybewh5w9mOM96-O-zgbo6wYAo7wfiw41wMrXhCNpwNbCtkw56SDWNcbmXftxfkRc4HxtggRfecXDRVrpTsN-TXTXQwQ31ioQhz8NYUnyJNI51SSUhtwgJ31ERHLeCx8oHm2ccKlXIUAtiC63fx0xJWf0l0xlQjgI4JIfhpfwocl2j_SMxYAB9l-XhY8L4CRVPyS_JsNCHDqxNekm8fP3y9_ry9_fLp5vrqdmuV5GXrbNtJUI0BGO3QCNNIZjswSgJnEoQEN_StbcQw7kcpFHAA56Tat8KB6VRzSd6vufOyn8DZego0Qc_oJ4P3OhmvHzPR_9Df01F3rFFqaGvA21MApp8L5KInny2EYCKkJWshGsGGvutZlXar1GLKGWE8j-FMP1SrD_pcrX6oVq_VVufrf7c8-_52WQVXqwDqrY4eUGfrIVpwHmtF2iX_3yG_AYRCwLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2232098780</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Yang, Qi ; Ramamurthy, Aditya ; Lall, Sophia ; Santos, Joshua ; Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan ; Lopane, Madeleine ; Zareen, Neela ; Alexander, Heather ; Ryan, Daniel ; Martin, John H. ; Carmel, Jason B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qi ; Ramamurthy, Aditya ; Lall, Sophia ; Santos, Joshua ; Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan ; Lopane, Madeleine ; Zareen, Neela ; Alexander, Heather ; Ryan, Daniel ; Martin, John H. ; Carmel, Jason B.</creatorcontrib><description>Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs arm and hand function largely by interrupting descending tracts. Most SCI spare some axons at the lesion, including the corticospinal tract (CST), which is critical for voluntary movement. We targeted descending motor connections with paired electrical stimulation of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord in the rat. We sought to replicate the previously published effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of forelimb motor cortex combined with trans-spinal direct current stimulation placed on the skin over the neck to target the cervical enlargement. We hypothesized that paired stimulation would improve performance in skilled walking and food manipulation (IBB) tasks. Rats received a moderate C4 spinal cord contusion injury (200 kDynes), which ablates the main CST. They were randomized to receive paired stimulation for 10 consecutive days starting 11 days after injury, or no stimulation. Behavior was assessed weekly from weeks 4–7 after injury, and then CST axons were traced. Rats with paired cortical and spinal stimulation achieved significantly better forelimb motor function recovery, as measured by fewer stepping errors on the horizontal ladder task (34 ± 9% in stimulation group vs. 51 ± 18% in control, p = .013) and higher scores on the food manipulation task (IBB, 0–9 score; 7.2 ± 0.8 in stimulated rats vs. 5.2 ± 2.6 in controls, p = .025). The effect size for both tasks was large (Cohen's d = 1.0 and 0.92, respectively). The CST axon length in the cervical spinal cord did not differ significantly between the groups, but there was denser and broader ipsilateral axons distribution distal to the spinal cord injury. The large behavioral effect and replication in an independent laboratory validate this approach, which will be trialed in cats before being tested in people using non-invasive methods.
[Display omitted]
•Paired motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation improved forelimb function after SCI.•This replicates the original study in an independent laboratory.•Stimulation promoted axons density in the spinal cord below the injury•Validation of individual methods before the study may have aided the replication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4886</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2430</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.112962</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31125548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cervical Cord - physiopathology ; Corticospinal ; Direct current stimulation ; Double-Blind Method ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Electrical stimulation ; Forelimb ; iTBS ; Motor Activity - physiology ; Motor cortex ; Motor Cortex - physiopathology ; Motor recovery ; Rats ; Recovery of Function - physiology ; Spinal cord ; Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology ; Spinal cord injury ; Transcutaneous</subject><ispartof>Experimental neurology, 2019-10, Vol.320, p.112962-112962, Article 112962</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-dc674e53aeefc932a340c7ea54e104e24ed986c329fbf425e1eedd45b62dea753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-dc674e53aeefc932a340c7ea54e104e24ed986c329fbf425e1eedd45b62dea753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.112962$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31125548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramamurthy, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lall, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopane, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zareen, Neela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmel, Jason B.</creatorcontrib><title>Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats</title><title>Experimental neurology</title><addtitle>Exp Neurol</addtitle><description>Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs arm and hand function largely by interrupting descending tracts. Most SCI spare some axons at the lesion, including the corticospinal tract (CST), which is critical for voluntary movement. We targeted descending motor connections with paired electrical stimulation of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord in the rat. We sought to replicate the previously published effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of forelimb motor cortex combined with trans-spinal direct current stimulation placed on the skin over the neck to target the cervical enlargement. We hypothesized that paired stimulation would improve performance in skilled walking and food manipulation (IBB) tasks. Rats received a moderate C4 spinal cord contusion injury (200 kDynes), which ablates the main CST. They were randomized to receive paired stimulation for 10 consecutive days starting 11 days after injury, or no stimulation. Behavior was assessed weekly from weeks 4–7 after injury, and then CST axons were traced. Rats with paired cortical and spinal stimulation achieved significantly better forelimb motor function recovery, as measured by fewer stepping errors on the horizontal ladder task (34 ± 9% in stimulation group vs. 51 ± 18% in control, p = .013) and higher scores on the food manipulation task (IBB, 0–9 score; 7.2 ± 0.8 in stimulated rats vs. 5.2 ± 2.6 in controls, p = .025). The effect size for both tasks was large (Cohen's d = 1.0 and 0.92, respectively). The CST axon length in the cervical spinal cord did not differ significantly between the groups, but there was denser and broader ipsilateral axons distribution distal to the spinal cord injury. The large behavioral effect and replication in an independent laboratory validate this approach, which will be trialed in cats before being tested in people using non-invasive methods.
[Display omitted]
•Paired motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation improved forelimb function after SCI.•This replicates the original study in an independent laboratory.•Stimulation promoted axons density in the spinal cord below the injury•Validation of individual methods before the study may have aided the replication.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cervical Cord - physiopathology</subject><subject>Corticospinal</subject><subject>Direct current stimulation</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Electrical stimulation</subject><subject>Forelimb</subject><subject>iTBS</subject><subject>Motor Activity - physiology</subject><subject>Motor cortex</subject><subject>Motor Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>Motor recovery</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Recovery of Function - physiology</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spinal cord injury</subject><subject>Transcutaneous</subject><issn>0014-4886</issn><issn>1090-2430</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUcuOFCEUJUbjtKO_oCzddAsU1GNjMpn4mGQSN7omNNxSOhSUF6oz8y3-rIzVdpyVG07Cedybewh5w9mOM96-O-zgbo6wYAo7wfiw41wMrXhCNpwNbCtkw56SDWNcbmXftxfkRc4HxtggRfecXDRVrpTsN-TXTXQwQ31ioQhz8NYUnyJNI51SSUhtwgJ31ERHLeCx8oHm2ccKlXIUAtiC63fx0xJWf0l0xlQjgI4JIfhpfwocl2j_SMxYAB9l-XhY8L4CRVPyS_JsNCHDqxNekm8fP3y9_ry9_fLp5vrqdmuV5GXrbNtJUI0BGO3QCNNIZjswSgJnEoQEN_StbcQw7kcpFHAA56Tat8KB6VRzSd6vufOyn8DZego0Qc_oJ4P3OhmvHzPR_9Df01F3rFFqaGvA21MApp8L5KInny2EYCKkJWshGsGGvutZlXar1GLKGWE8j-FMP1SrD_pcrX6oVq_VVufrf7c8-_52WQVXqwDqrY4eUGfrIVpwHmtF2iX_3yG_AYRCwLQ</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Yang, Qi</creator><creator>Ramamurthy, Aditya</creator><creator>Lall, Sophia</creator><creator>Santos, Joshua</creator><creator>Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan</creator><creator>Lopane, Madeleine</creator><creator>Zareen, Neela</creator><creator>Alexander, Heather</creator><creator>Ryan, Daniel</creator><creator>Martin, John H.</creator><creator>Carmel, Jason B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats</title><author>Yang, Qi ; Ramamurthy, Aditya ; Lall, Sophia ; Santos, Joshua ; Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan ; Lopane, Madeleine ; Zareen, Neela ; Alexander, Heather ; Ryan, Daniel ; Martin, John H. ; Carmel, Jason B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-dc674e53aeefc932a340c7ea54e104e24ed986c329fbf425e1eedd45b62dea753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cervical Cord - physiopathology</topic><topic>Corticospinal</topic><topic>Direct current stimulation</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Electrical stimulation</topic><topic>Forelimb</topic><topic>iTBS</topic><topic>Motor Activity - physiology</topic><topic>Motor cortex</topic><topic>Motor Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>Motor recovery</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Recovery of Function - physiology</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spinal cord injury</topic><topic>Transcutaneous</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramamurthy, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lall, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopane, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zareen, Neela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmel, Jason B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Experimental neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Qi</au><au>Ramamurthy, Aditya</au><au>Lall, Sophia</au><au>Santos, Joshua</au><au>Ratnadurai-Giridharan, Shivakeshavan</au><au>Lopane, Madeleine</au><au>Zareen, Neela</au><au>Alexander, Heather</au><au>Ryan, Daniel</au><au>Martin, John H.</au><au>Carmel, Jason B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats</atitle><jtitle>Experimental neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Neurol</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>320</volume><spage>112962</spage><epage>112962</epage><pages>112962-112962</pages><artnum>112962</artnum><issn>0014-4886</issn><eissn>1090-2430</eissn><abstract>Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) impairs arm and hand function largely by interrupting descending tracts. Most SCI spare some axons at the lesion, including the corticospinal tract (CST), which is critical for voluntary movement. We targeted descending motor connections with paired electrical stimulation of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord in the rat. We sought to replicate the previously published effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of forelimb motor cortex combined with trans-spinal direct current stimulation placed on the skin over the neck to target the cervical enlargement. We hypothesized that paired stimulation would improve performance in skilled walking and food manipulation (IBB) tasks. Rats received a moderate C4 spinal cord contusion injury (200 kDynes), which ablates the main CST. They were randomized to receive paired stimulation for 10 consecutive days starting 11 days after injury, or no stimulation. Behavior was assessed weekly from weeks 4–7 after injury, and then CST axons were traced. Rats with paired cortical and spinal stimulation achieved significantly better forelimb motor function recovery, as measured by fewer stepping errors on the horizontal ladder task (34 ± 9% in stimulation group vs. 51 ± 18% in control, p = .013) and higher scores on the food manipulation task (IBB, 0–9 score; 7.2 ± 0.8 in stimulated rats vs. 5.2 ± 2.6 in controls, p = .025). The effect size for both tasks was large (Cohen's d = 1.0 and 0.92, respectively). The CST axon length in the cervical spinal cord did not differ significantly between the groups, but there was denser and broader ipsilateral axons distribution distal to the spinal cord injury. The large behavioral effect and replication in an independent laboratory validate this approach, which will be trialed in cats before being tested in people using non-invasive methods.
[Display omitted]
•Paired motor cortex and spinal cord stimulation improved forelimb function after SCI.•This replicates the original study in an independent laboratory.•Stimulation promoted axons density in the spinal cord below the injury•Validation of individual methods before the study may have aided the replication.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31125548</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.112962</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-4886 |
ispartof | Experimental neurology, 2019-10, Vol.320, p.112962-112962, Article 112962 |
issn | 0014-4886 1090-2430 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7035596 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Animals Cervical Cord - physiopathology Corticospinal Direct current stimulation Double-Blind Method Electric Stimulation - methods Electrical stimulation Forelimb iTBS Motor Activity - physiology Motor cortex Motor Cortex - physiopathology Motor recovery Rats Recovery of Function - physiology Spinal cord Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology Spinal cord injury Transcutaneous |
title | Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A27%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Independent%20replication%20of%20motor%20cortex%20and%20cervical%20spinal%20cord%20electrical%20stimulation%20to%20promote%20forelimb%20motor%20function%20after%20spinal%20cord%20injury%20in%20rats&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20neurology&rft.au=Yang,%20Qi&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=320&rft.spage=112962&rft.epage=112962&rft.pages=112962-112962&rft.artnum=112962&rft.issn=0014-4886&rft.eissn=1090-2430&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.112962&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2232098780%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2232098780&rft_id=info:pmid/31125548&rft_els_id=S0014488619301086&rfr_iscdi=true |