Thumb interphalangeal joint arthrodesis angles in patients with carpometacarpal osteoarthritis

Previous studies have shown that thumb interphalangeal (IP) joint arthrodesis is typically performed between 0 and 30° of flexion, with a recent study in healthy subjects having recommended a range of 15–30° to be an ideal functional IP joint fusion angle for various activities of daily living. The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedics 2020-09, Vol.21, p.53-57
Hauptverfasser: Ramski, David E., McGowan, Shane M., Wojda, Thomas R., Rae, Matthew A., Matullo, Kristofer S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 57
container_issue
container_start_page 53
container_title Journal of orthopaedics
container_volume 21
creator Ramski, David E.
McGowan, Shane M.
Wojda, Thomas R.
Rae, Matthew A.
Matullo, Kristofer S.
description Previous studies have shown that thumb interphalangeal (IP) joint arthrodesis is typically performed between 0 and 30° of flexion, with a recent study in healthy subjects having recommended a range of 15–30° to be an ideal functional IP joint fusion angle for various activities of daily living. The current study aimed to evaluate the ideal thumb IP fusion angle in patients with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA). Twenty-seven patients with thumb CMC OA were evaluated; five patients had bilateral pathology, for a total of thirty-two thumbs included. Hand dominance was noted and baseline unsplinted measurements were obtained for power tasks, precision tasks, pinch, and grip strength testing. Patients’ thumbs were then splinted at 0, 15, 30, and 45° with repeat measurements taken and compared to baseline. Outcomes were measured by use of a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale, timing of tasks, and a dynamometer. Outcomes were analyzed by Wilcoxon sign ranked tests for each category of trials. For significant outcomes, the most favorable simulated thumb fusion angles were 15° in the dominant hand and 0°, 15° in the nondominant hand (precision tasks); the least favorable position was found to be 45° in the dominant hand (precision tasks, pinch strength). When combining all outcomes that both reached and approached significance, the most favorable position was found to be 15° and least favorable position, 45°. In patients with thumb CMC OA, an IP fusion angle of 15° is preferable, while a fusion angle of 45° is to be avoided. Therapeutic Study, Level III.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7029342</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0972978X20300465</els_id><sourcerecordid>2365225902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-49325219e8447fec553803ed46ecb6a6b29c9d170948b57c6a9c5ba57f2bbdd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1LAzEUDKLYWv0BXmSPXrrmY7-CIEjxCwpeKngyZLOv3Sy7zZqkFf-9qa1SL57yyJuZN8wgdE5wTDDJrpq4MTammOIYkxiz5AANMc_pmOfF6-HePEAnzjUYM5pm7BgNGMWc0zwZordZverKSC892L6WrVwuQLZRY8JPJK2vranAaReFRQsuAKNeeg1L76IP7etISdubDrzcDIFpnAfzTdReu1N0NJetg7PdO0Iv93ezyeN4-vzwNLmdjhUriB8nPDijhEORJPkcVJqyAjOokgxUmcmspFzxiuSYJ0WZ5iqTXKWlTPM5LcuqYmyEbra6_arsoFLBn5Wt6K3upP0URmrxd7PUtViYtcgx5SyhQeByJ2DN-wqcF512CtoQCJiVE5RlKaUpxxso2UKVNc5ZmP-eIVhsehGNCL2ITS8CExF6CZyLfX-_jJ8iAuB6C4CQ0lqDFU6FlBVU2oLyojL6H_kvbc-iEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2365225902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thumb interphalangeal joint arthrodesis angles in patients with carpometacarpal osteoarthritis</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ramski, David E. ; McGowan, Shane M. ; Wojda, Thomas R. ; Rae, Matthew A. ; Matullo, Kristofer S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramski, David E. ; McGowan, Shane M. ; Wojda, Thomas R. ; Rae, Matthew A. ; Matullo, Kristofer S.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies have shown that thumb interphalangeal (IP) joint arthrodesis is typically performed between 0 and 30° of flexion, with a recent study in healthy subjects having recommended a range of 15–30° to be an ideal functional IP joint fusion angle for various activities of daily living. The current study aimed to evaluate the ideal thumb IP fusion angle in patients with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA). Twenty-seven patients with thumb CMC OA were evaluated; five patients had bilateral pathology, for a total of thirty-two thumbs included. Hand dominance was noted and baseline unsplinted measurements were obtained for power tasks, precision tasks, pinch, and grip strength testing. Patients’ thumbs were then splinted at 0, 15, 30, and 45° with repeat measurements taken and compared to baseline. Outcomes were measured by use of a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale, timing of tasks, and a dynamometer. Outcomes were analyzed by Wilcoxon sign ranked tests for each category of trials. For significant outcomes, the most favorable simulated thumb fusion angles were 15° in the dominant hand and 0°, 15° in the nondominant hand (precision tasks); the least favorable position was found to be 45° in the dominant hand (precision tasks, pinch strength). When combining all outcomes that both reached and approached significance, the most favorable position was found to be 15° and least favorable position, 45°. In patients with thumb CMC OA, an IP fusion angle of 15° is preferable, while a fusion angle of 45° is to be avoided. Therapeutic Study, Level III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-978X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0972-978X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32099274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Carpometacarpal arthritis ; Joint arthrodesis ; Osteoarthritis ; Thumb arthritis</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedics, 2020-09, Vol.21, p.53-57</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation.</rights><rights>2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-49325219e8447fec553803ed46ecb6a6b29c9d170948b57c6a9c5ba57f2bbdd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-49325219e8447fec553803ed46ecb6a6b29c9d170948b57c6a9c5ba57f2bbdd33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3838-8018 ; 0000-0003-0014-3127 ; 0000-0003-1498-6635</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029342/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029342/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramski, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Shane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojda, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rae, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matullo, Kristofer S.</creatorcontrib><title>Thumb interphalangeal joint arthrodesis angles in patients with carpometacarpal osteoarthritis</title><title>Journal of orthopaedics</title><addtitle>J Orthop</addtitle><description>Previous studies have shown that thumb interphalangeal (IP) joint arthrodesis is typically performed between 0 and 30° of flexion, with a recent study in healthy subjects having recommended a range of 15–30° to be an ideal functional IP joint fusion angle for various activities of daily living. The current study aimed to evaluate the ideal thumb IP fusion angle in patients with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA). Twenty-seven patients with thumb CMC OA were evaluated; five patients had bilateral pathology, for a total of thirty-two thumbs included. Hand dominance was noted and baseline unsplinted measurements were obtained for power tasks, precision tasks, pinch, and grip strength testing. Patients’ thumbs were then splinted at 0, 15, 30, and 45° with repeat measurements taken and compared to baseline. Outcomes were measured by use of a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale, timing of tasks, and a dynamometer. Outcomes were analyzed by Wilcoxon sign ranked tests for each category of trials. For significant outcomes, the most favorable simulated thumb fusion angles were 15° in the dominant hand and 0°, 15° in the nondominant hand (precision tasks); the least favorable position was found to be 45° in the dominant hand (precision tasks, pinch strength). When combining all outcomes that both reached and approached significance, the most favorable position was found to be 15° and least favorable position, 45°. In patients with thumb CMC OA, an IP fusion angle of 15° is preferable, while a fusion angle of 45° is to be avoided. Therapeutic Study, Level III.</description><subject>Carpometacarpal arthritis</subject><subject>Joint arthrodesis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Thumb arthritis</subject><issn>0972-978X</issn><issn>0972-978X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UU1LAzEUDKLYWv0BXmSPXrrmY7-CIEjxCwpeKngyZLOv3Sy7zZqkFf-9qa1SL57yyJuZN8wgdE5wTDDJrpq4MTammOIYkxiz5AANMc_pmOfF6-HePEAnzjUYM5pm7BgNGMWc0zwZordZverKSC892L6WrVwuQLZRY8JPJK2vranAaReFRQsuAKNeeg1L76IP7etISdubDrzcDIFpnAfzTdReu1N0NJetg7PdO0Iv93ezyeN4-vzwNLmdjhUriB8nPDijhEORJPkcVJqyAjOokgxUmcmspFzxiuSYJ0WZ5iqTXKWlTPM5LcuqYmyEbra6_arsoFLBn5Wt6K3upP0URmrxd7PUtViYtcgx5SyhQeByJ2DN-wqcF512CtoQCJiVE5RlKaUpxxso2UKVNc5ZmP-eIVhsehGNCL2ITS8CExF6CZyLfX-_jJ8iAuB6C4CQ0lqDFU6FlBVU2oLyojL6H_kvbc-iEA</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Ramski, David E.</creator><creator>McGowan, Shane M.</creator><creator>Wojda, Thomas R.</creator><creator>Rae, Matthew A.</creator><creator>Matullo, Kristofer S.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3838-8018</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0014-3127</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1498-6635</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Thumb interphalangeal joint arthrodesis angles in patients with carpometacarpal osteoarthritis</title><author>Ramski, David E. ; McGowan, Shane M. ; Wojda, Thomas R. ; Rae, Matthew A. ; Matullo, Kristofer S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-49325219e8447fec553803ed46ecb6a6b29c9d170948b57c6a9c5ba57f2bbdd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Carpometacarpal arthritis</topic><topic>Joint arthrodesis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Thumb arthritis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramski, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGowan, Shane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojda, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rae, Matthew A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matullo, Kristofer S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramski, David E.</au><au>McGowan, Shane M.</au><au>Wojda, Thomas R.</au><au>Rae, Matthew A.</au><au>Matullo, Kristofer S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thumb interphalangeal joint arthrodesis angles in patients with carpometacarpal osteoarthritis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedics</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><spage>53</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>53-57</pages><issn>0972-978X</issn><eissn>0972-978X</eissn><abstract>Previous studies have shown that thumb interphalangeal (IP) joint arthrodesis is typically performed between 0 and 30° of flexion, with a recent study in healthy subjects having recommended a range of 15–30° to be an ideal functional IP joint fusion angle for various activities of daily living. The current study aimed to evaluate the ideal thumb IP fusion angle in patients with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA). Twenty-seven patients with thumb CMC OA were evaluated; five patients had bilateral pathology, for a total of thirty-two thumbs included. Hand dominance was noted and baseline unsplinted measurements were obtained for power tasks, precision tasks, pinch, and grip strength testing. Patients’ thumbs were then splinted at 0, 15, 30, and 45° with repeat measurements taken and compared to baseline. Outcomes were measured by use of a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale, timing of tasks, and a dynamometer. Outcomes were analyzed by Wilcoxon sign ranked tests for each category of trials. For significant outcomes, the most favorable simulated thumb fusion angles were 15° in the dominant hand and 0°, 15° in the nondominant hand (precision tasks); the least favorable position was found to be 45° in the dominant hand (precision tasks, pinch strength). When combining all outcomes that both reached and approached significance, the most favorable position was found to be 15° and least favorable position, 45°. In patients with thumb CMC OA, an IP fusion angle of 15° is preferable, while a fusion angle of 45° is to be avoided. Therapeutic Study, Level III.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32099274</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.034</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3838-8018</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0014-3127</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1498-6635</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-978X
ispartof Journal of orthopaedics, 2020-09, Vol.21, p.53-57
issn 0972-978X
0972-978X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7029342
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Carpometacarpal arthritis
Joint arthrodesis
Osteoarthritis
Thumb arthritis
title Thumb interphalangeal joint arthrodesis angles in patients with carpometacarpal osteoarthritis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A37%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thumb%20interphalangeal%20joint%20arthrodesis%20angles%20in%20patients%20with%20carpometacarpal%20osteoarthritis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Ramski,%20David%20E.&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=21&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=53-57&rft.issn=0972-978X&rft.eissn=0972-978X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2365225902%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2365225902&rft_id=info:pmid/32099274&rft_els_id=S0972978X20300465&rfr_iscdi=true