Using high-frequency phosphorus monitoring for water quality management: a case study of the upper River Itchen, UK

Increased concentrations of phosphorus (P) in riverine systems lead to eutrophication and can contribute to other environmental effects. Chalk rivers are known to be particularly sensitive to elevated P levels. We used high-frequency (daily) automatic water sampling at five distinct locations in the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental monitoring and assessment 2020-03, Vol.192 (3), p.184-184, Article 184
Hauptverfasser: Fones, Gary R., Bakir, Adil, Gray, Janina, Mattingley, Lauren, Measham, Nick, Knight, Paul, Bowes, Michael J., Greenwood, Richard, Mills, Graham A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 184
container_issue 3
container_start_page 184
container_title Environmental monitoring and assessment
container_volume 192
creator Fones, Gary R.
Bakir, Adil
Gray, Janina
Mattingley, Lauren
Measham, Nick
Knight, Paul
Bowes, Michael J.
Greenwood, Richard
Mills, Graham A.
description Increased concentrations of phosphorus (P) in riverine systems lead to eutrophication and can contribute to other environmental effects. Chalk rivers are known to be particularly sensitive to elevated P levels. We used high-frequency (daily) automatic water sampling at five distinct locations in the upper River Itchen (Hampshire, UK) between May 2016 and June 2017 to identify the main P species (including filterable reactive phosphorus, total filterable phosphorus, total phosphorus and total particulate phosphorus) present and how these varied temporally. Our filterable reactive phosphorus (considered the biologically available fraction) data were compared with the available Environment Agency total reactive phosphorus (TRP) values over the same sampling period. Over the trial, the profiles of the P fractions were complex; the major fraction was total particulate phosphorus with the mean percentage value ranging between 69 and 82% of the total P present. Sources were likely to be attributable to wash off from agricultural activities. At all sites, the FRP and Environment Agency TRP mean concentrations over the study were comparable. However, there were a number of extended time periods (1 to 2 weeks) where the mean FRP concentration (e.g. 0.62 mg L −1 ) exceeded the existing regulatory values (giving a poor ecological status) for this type of river. Often, these exceedances were missed by the limited regulatory monitoring procedures undertaken by the Environment Agency. There is evidence that these spikes of elevated concentrations of P may have a biological impact on benthic invertebrate (e.g. blue-winged olive mayfly) communities that exist in these ecologically sensitive chalk streams. Further research is required to assess the ecological impact of P and how this might have implications for the development of future environmental regulations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10661-020-8138-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7028801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2400452444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-ef3781f25f421fa153a0ae8fac8b3ac4939241be49df776ad9be80dd1ef9da323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtv1DAURi0EotPCD2CDLLFh0cD1I3HMohKqeFRUQkLM2vIk1xNXSZzaSdH8exxNKQ-Jhe2Fz_18rw8hLxi8YQDqbWJQVawADkXNRF3AI7JhpRIF16V-TDbAKlVUotIn5DSlGwDQSuqn5ERwUFxItSFpm_y4p53fd4WLeLvg2Bzo1IWUV1wSHcLo5xBXyIVIf9gZI71dbO_nAx3saPc44Di_o5Y2NiFN89IeaHB07pAu05Tpb_4u71dz0-F4TrdfnpEnzvYJn9-fZ2T78cP3y8_F9ddPV5fvr4umBDEX6ISqmeOlk5w5y0phwWLtbFPvhG2kFppLtkOpW6dUZVu9wxralqHTrRVcnJGLY-607AZsm9xmtL2Zoh9sPJhgvfn7ZvSd2Yc7o4DXNbAc8Po-IIb8M2k2g08N9r0dMSzJcAkgSy6lzOirf9CbsMQxj2e4KBVnqoK1I3akmhhSiugemmFgVqXmqNRkpWZVaiDXvPxzioeKXw4zwI9AmlZNGH8__f_Un3K8ro8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2357217602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using high-frequency phosphorus monitoring for water quality management: a case study of the upper River Itchen, UK</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Fones, Gary R. ; Bakir, Adil ; Gray, Janina ; Mattingley, Lauren ; Measham, Nick ; Knight, Paul ; Bowes, Michael J. ; Greenwood, Richard ; Mills, Graham A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fones, Gary R. ; Bakir, Adil ; Gray, Janina ; Mattingley, Lauren ; Measham, Nick ; Knight, Paul ; Bowes, Michael J. ; Greenwood, Richard ; Mills, Graham A.</creatorcontrib><description>Increased concentrations of phosphorus (P) in riverine systems lead to eutrophication and can contribute to other environmental effects. Chalk rivers are known to be particularly sensitive to elevated P levels. We used high-frequency (daily) automatic water sampling at five distinct locations in the upper River Itchen (Hampshire, UK) between May 2016 and June 2017 to identify the main P species (including filterable reactive phosphorus, total filterable phosphorus, total phosphorus and total particulate phosphorus) present and how these varied temporally. Our filterable reactive phosphorus (considered the biologically available fraction) data were compared with the available Environment Agency total reactive phosphorus (TRP) values over the same sampling period. Over the trial, the profiles of the P fractions were complex; the major fraction was total particulate phosphorus with the mean percentage value ranging between 69 and 82% of the total P present. Sources were likely to be attributable to wash off from agricultural activities. At all sites, the FRP and Environment Agency TRP mean concentrations over the study were comparable. However, there were a number of extended time periods (1 to 2 weeks) where the mean FRP concentration (e.g. 0.62 mg L −1 ) exceeded the existing regulatory values (giving a poor ecological status) for this type of river. Often, these exceedances were missed by the limited regulatory monitoring procedures undertaken by the Environment Agency. There is evidence that these spikes of elevated concentrations of P may have a biological impact on benthic invertebrate (e.g. blue-winged olive mayfly) communities that exist in these ecologically sensitive chalk streams. Further research is required to assess the ecological impact of P and how this might have implications for the development of future environmental regulations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-020-8138-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32072347</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; Animals ; Aquatic insects ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Benthic fauna ; benthic organisms ; Benthos ; case studies ; Chalk ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental effects ; environmental impact ; environmental law ; Environmental Management ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental regulations ; Environmental science ; Ephemeroptera ; Eutrophication ; Filterability ; Invertebrates ; monitoring ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; olives ; Phosphorus ; Phosphorus - analysis ; Procedures ; Profiles ; Quality management ; reactive phosphorus ; Rivers ; Streams ; total particulate phosphorus ; United Kingdom ; Water analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical ; Water Quality ; Water quality management ; Water sampling ; Zoobenthos</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2020-03, Vol.192 (3), p.184-184, Article 184</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-ef3781f25f421fa153a0ae8fac8b3ac4939241be49df776ad9be80dd1ef9da323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-ef3781f25f421fa153a0ae8fac8b3ac4939241be49df776ad9be80dd1ef9da323</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1999-0716</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-020-8138-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-020-8138-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32072347$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fones, Gary R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakir, Adil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Janina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattingley, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Measham, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowes, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, Graham A.</creatorcontrib><title>Using high-frequency phosphorus monitoring for water quality management: a case study of the upper River Itchen, UK</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>Increased concentrations of phosphorus (P) in riverine systems lead to eutrophication and can contribute to other environmental effects. Chalk rivers are known to be particularly sensitive to elevated P levels. We used high-frequency (daily) automatic water sampling at five distinct locations in the upper River Itchen (Hampshire, UK) between May 2016 and June 2017 to identify the main P species (including filterable reactive phosphorus, total filterable phosphorus, total phosphorus and total particulate phosphorus) present and how these varied temporally. Our filterable reactive phosphorus (considered the biologically available fraction) data were compared with the available Environment Agency total reactive phosphorus (TRP) values over the same sampling period. Over the trial, the profiles of the P fractions were complex; the major fraction was total particulate phosphorus with the mean percentage value ranging between 69 and 82% of the total P present. Sources were likely to be attributable to wash off from agricultural activities. At all sites, the FRP and Environment Agency TRP mean concentrations over the study were comparable. However, there were a number of extended time periods (1 to 2 weeks) where the mean FRP concentration (e.g. 0.62 mg L −1 ) exceeded the existing regulatory values (giving a poor ecological status) for this type of river. Often, these exceedances were missed by the limited regulatory monitoring procedures undertaken by the Environment Agency. There is evidence that these spikes of elevated concentrations of P may have a biological impact on benthic invertebrate (e.g. blue-winged olive mayfly) communities that exist in these ecologically sensitive chalk streams. Further research is required to assess the ecological impact of P and how this might have implications for the development of future environmental regulations.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic insects</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Benthic fauna</subject><subject>benthic organisms</subject><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>case studies</subject><subject>Chalk</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental effects</subject><subject>environmental impact</subject><subject>environmental law</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental regulations</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Ephemeroptera</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Filterability</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>olives</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Phosphorus - analysis</subject><subject>Procedures</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>reactive phosphorus</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>total particulate phosphorus</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical</subject><subject>Water Quality</subject><subject>Water quality management</subject><subject>Water sampling</subject><subject>Zoobenthos</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtv1DAURi0EotPCD2CDLLFh0cD1I3HMohKqeFRUQkLM2vIk1xNXSZzaSdH8exxNKQ-Jhe2Fz_18rw8hLxi8YQDqbWJQVawADkXNRF3AI7JhpRIF16V-TDbAKlVUotIn5DSlGwDQSuqn5ERwUFxItSFpm_y4p53fd4WLeLvg2Bzo1IWUV1wSHcLo5xBXyIVIf9gZI71dbO_nAx3saPc44Di_o5Y2NiFN89IeaHB07pAu05Tpb_4u71dz0-F4TrdfnpEnzvYJn9-fZ2T78cP3y8_F9ddPV5fvr4umBDEX6ISqmeOlk5w5y0phwWLtbFPvhG2kFppLtkOpW6dUZVu9wxralqHTrRVcnJGLY-607AZsm9xmtL2Zoh9sPJhgvfn7ZvSd2Yc7o4DXNbAc8Po-IIb8M2k2g08N9r0dMSzJcAkgSy6lzOirf9CbsMQxj2e4KBVnqoK1I3akmhhSiugemmFgVqXmqNRkpWZVaiDXvPxzioeKXw4zwI9AmlZNGH8__f_Un3K8ro8</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Fones, Gary R.</creator><creator>Bakir, Adil</creator><creator>Gray, Janina</creator><creator>Mattingley, Lauren</creator><creator>Measham, Nick</creator><creator>Knight, Paul</creator><creator>Bowes, Michael J.</creator><creator>Greenwood, Richard</creator><creator>Mills, Graham A.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1999-0716</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Using high-frequency phosphorus monitoring for water quality management: a case study of the upper River Itchen, UK</title><author>Fones, Gary R. ; Bakir, Adil ; Gray, Janina ; Mattingley, Lauren ; Measham, Nick ; Knight, Paul ; Bowes, Michael J. ; Greenwood, Richard ; Mills, Graham A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-ef3781f25f421fa153a0ae8fac8b3ac4939241be49df776ad9be80dd1ef9da323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic insects</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Benthic fauna</topic><topic>benthic organisms</topic><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>case studies</topic><topic>Chalk</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental effects</topic><topic>environmental impact</topic><topic>environmental law</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental regulations</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Ephemeroptera</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Filterability</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>olives</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Phosphorus - analysis</topic><topic>Procedures</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>reactive phosphorus</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>total particulate phosphorus</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical</topic><topic>Water Quality</topic><topic>Water quality management</topic><topic>Water sampling</topic><topic>Zoobenthos</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fones, Gary R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakir, Adil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Janina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattingley, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Measham, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowes, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, Graham A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fones, Gary R.</au><au>Bakir, Adil</au><au>Gray, Janina</au><au>Mattingley, Lauren</au><au>Measham, Nick</au><au>Knight, Paul</au><au>Bowes, Michael J.</au><au>Greenwood, Richard</au><au>Mills, Graham A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using high-frequency phosphorus monitoring for water quality management: a case study of the upper River Itchen, UK</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>192</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>184</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>184-184</pages><artnum>184</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>Increased concentrations of phosphorus (P) in riverine systems lead to eutrophication and can contribute to other environmental effects. Chalk rivers are known to be particularly sensitive to elevated P levels. We used high-frequency (daily) automatic water sampling at five distinct locations in the upper River Itchen (Hampshire, UK) between May 2016 and June 2017 to identify the main P species (including filterable reactive phosphorus, total filterable phosphorus, total phosphorus and total particulate phosphorus) present and how these varied temporally. Our filterable reactive phosphorus (considered the biologically available fraction) data were compared with the available Environment Agency total reactive phosphorus (TRP) values over the same sampling period. Over the trial, the profiles of the P fractions were complex; the major fraction was total particulate phosphorus with the mean percentage value ranging between 69 and 82% of the total P present. Sources were likely to be attributable to wash off from agricultural activities. At all sites, the FRP and Environment Agency TRP mean concentrations over the study were comparable. However, there were a number of extended time periods (1 to 2 weeks) where the mean FRP concentration (e.g. 0.62 mg L −1 ) exceeded the existing regulatory values (giving a poor ecological status) for this type of river. Often, these exceedances were missed by the limited regulatory monitoring procedures undertaken by the Environment Agency. There is evidence that these spikes of elevated concentrations of P may have a biological impact on benthic invertebrate (e.g. blue-winged olive mayfly) communities that exist in these ecologically sensitive chalk streams. Further research is required to assess the ecological impact of P and how this might have implications for the development of future environmental regulations.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>32072347</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-020-8138-0</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1999-0716</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6369
ispartof Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2020-03, Vol.192 (3), p.184-184, Article 184
issn 0167-6369
1573-2959
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7028801
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Agricultural management
Animals
Aquatic insects
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Benthic fauna
benthic organisms
Benthos
case studies
Chalk
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecological monitoring
Ecology
Ecotoxicology
Environment
Environmental effects
environmental impact
environmental law
Environmental Management
Environmental Monitoring
Environmental regulations
Environmental science
Ephemeroptera
Eutrophication
Filterability
Invertebrates
monitoring
Monitoring/Environmental Analysis
olives
Phosphorus
Phosphorus - analysis
Procedures
Profiles
Quality management
reactive phosphorus
Rivers
Streams
total particulate phosphorus
United Kingdom
Water analysis
Water Pollutants, Chemical
Water Quality
Water quality management
Water sampling
Zoobenthos
title Using high-frequency phosphorus monitoring for water quality management: a case study of the upper River Itchen, UK
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A11%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20high-frequency%20phosphorus%20monitoring%20for%20water%20quality%20management:%20a%20case%20study%20of%20the%20upper%20River%20Itchen,%20UK&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Fones,%20Gary%20R.&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=192&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=184&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=184-184&rft.artnum=184&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-020-8138-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2400452444%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2357217602&rft_id=info:pmid/32072347&rfr_iscdi=true