Planning for climate change through additions to a national protected area network: implications for cost and configuration

Expanding the network of protected areas is a core strategy for conserving biodiversity in the face of climate change. Here, we explore the impacts on reserve network cost and configuration associated with planning for climate change in the USA using networks that prioritize areas projected to be cl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2020-03, Vol.375 (1794), p.20190117
Hauptverfasser: Lawler, Joshua J, Rinnan, D Scott, Michalak, Julia L, Withey, John C, Randels, Christopher R, Possingham, Hugh P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1794
container_start_page 20190117
container_title Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences
container_volume 375
creator Lawler, Joshua J
Rinnan, D Scott
Michalak, Julia L
Withey, John C
Randels, Christopher R
Possingham, Hugh P
description Expanding the network of protected areas is a core strategy for conserving biodiversity in the face of climate change. Here, we explore the impacts on reserve network cost and configuration associated with planning for climate change in the USA using networks that prioritize areas projected to be climatically suitable for 1460 species both today and into the future, climatic refugia and areas likely to facilitate climate-driven species movements. For 14% of the species, networks of sites selected solely to protect areas currently climatically suitable failed to provide climatically suitable habitat in the future. Protecting sites climatically suitable for species today and in the future significantly changed the distribution of priority sites across the USA-increasing relative protection in the northeast, northwest and central USA. Protecting areas projected to retain their climatic suitability for species cost 59% more than solely protecting currently suitable areas. Including all climatic refugia and 20% of areas that facilitate climate-driven movements increased the cost by another 18%. Our results indicate that protecting some types of climatic refugia may be a relatively inexpensive adaptation strategy. Moreover, although addressing climate change in conservation plans will have significant implications for the configuration of networks, the increased cost of doing so may be relatively modest. This article is part of the theme issue 'Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions'.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rstb.2019.0117
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7017760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31983335</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-f4256c102a0f221a3e74be53ef2b8eeaaa7437d068b2c501b5de40d274fe83663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1P3DAQtVBRd4FeOVb-A1nGdhInPVSqEAWkleAAZ2viTLKmWXvleIuq_vkmuxS1p_l4895o5jF2KWAloK6u4pialQRRr0AIfcKWItcik7WGD2wJdSmzKlflgp2N4wsA1IXOP7KFEnWllCqW7PfjgN473_MuRG4Ht8VE3G7Q98TTJoZ9v-HYti654EeeAkfucS5w4LsYEtlELcdIU5_Sa4g_vnC33Q3O4pFy0A1j4ujbKfGd6_fxgF2w0w6HkT69xXP2_P3m6fouWz_c3l9_W2e2UHXKulwWpRUgETopBSrSeUOFok42FREi6lzpFsqqkbYA0RQt5dBKnXdUqbJU5-zrUXe3b7bUWvIp4mB2cTo2_jIBnfkf8W5j-vDTaBBalzAJrI4CNoZxjNS9cwWY2QYz22BmG8xsw0T4_O_G9_G_f1d_AIh8iJ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Planning for climate change through additions to a national protected area network: implications for cost and configuration</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lawler, Joshua J ; Rinnan, D Scott ; Michalak, Julia L ; Withey, John C ; Randels, Christopher R ; Possingham, Hugh P</creator><creatorcontrib>Lawler, Joshua J ; Rinnan, D Scott ; Michalak, Julia L ; Withey, John C ; Randels, Christopher R ; Possingham, Hugh P</creatorcontrib><description>Expanding the network of protected areas is a core strategy for conserving biodiversity in the face of climate change. Here, we explore the impacts on reserve network cost and configuration associated with planning for climate change in the USA using networks that prioritize areas projected to be climatically suitable for 1460 species both today and into the future, climatic refugia and areas likely to facilitate climate-driven species movements. For 14% of the species, networks of sites selected solely to protect areas currently climatically suitable failed to provide climatically suitable habitat in the future. Protecting sites climatically suitable for species today and in the future significantly changed the distribution of priority sites across the USA-increasing relative protection in the northeast, northwest and central USA. Protecting areas projected to retain their climatic suitability for species cost 59% more than solely protecting currently suitable areas. Including all climatic refugia and 20% of areas that facilitate climate-driven movements increased the cost by another 18%. Our results indicate that protecting some types of climatic refugia may be a relatively inexpensive adaptation strategy. Moreover, although addressing climate change in conservation plans will have significant implications for the configuration of networks, the increased cost of doing so may be relatively modest. This article is part of the theme issue 'Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions'.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0117</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31983335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Animal Distribution ; Biodiversity ; Climate Change - economics ; Conservation of Natural Resources - economics ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Parks, Recreational - economics ; Plant Dispersal ; Refugium ; United States</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2020-03, Vol.375 (1794), p.20190117</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-f4256c102a0f221a3e74be53ef2b8eeaaa7437d068b2c501b5de40d274fe83663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-f4256c102a0f221a3e74be53ef2b8eeaaa7437d068b2c501b5de40d274fe83663</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9686-8450 ; 0000-0002-8306-3175 ; 0000-0002-2524-8390 ; 0000-0001-8715-6910 ; 0000-0001-7755-996X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7017760/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7017760/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31983335$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lawler, Joshua J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinnan, D Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michalak, Julia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Withey, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randels, Christopher R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Possingham, Hugh P</creatorcontrib><title>Planning for climate change through additions to a national protected area network: implications for cost and configuration</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Expanding the network of protected areas is a core strategy for conserving biodiversity in the face of climate change. Here, we explore the impacts on reserve network cost and configuration associated with planning for climate change in the USA using networks that prioritize areas projected to be climatically suitable for 1460 species both today and into the future, climatic refugia and areas likely to facilitate climate-driven species movements. For 14% of the species, networks of sites selected solely to protect areas currently climatically suitable failed to provide climatically suitable habitat in the future. Protecting sites climatically suitable for species today and in the future significantly changed the distribution of priority sites across the USA-increasing relative protection in the northeast, northwest and central USA. Protecting areas projected to retain their climatic suitability for species cost 59% more than solely protecting currently suitable areas. Including all climatic refugia and 20% of areas that facilitate climate-driven movements increased the cost by another 18%. Our results indicate that protecting some types of climatic refugia may be a relatively inexpensive adaptation strategy. Moreover, although addressing climate change in conservation plans will have significant implications for the configuration of networks, the increased cost of doing so may be relatively modest. This article is part of the theme issue 'Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions'.</description><subject>Animal Distribution</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Climate Change - economics</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Parks, Recreational - economics</subject><subject>Plant Dispersal</subject><subject>Refugium</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1P3DAQtVBRd4FeOVb-A1nGdhInPVSqEAWkleAAZ2viTLKmWXvleIuq_vkmuxS1p_l4895o5jF2KWAloK6u4pialQRRr0AIfcKWItcik7WGD2wJdSmzKlflgp2N4wsA1IXOP7KFEnWllCqW7PfjgN473_MuRG4Ht8VE3G7Q98TTJoZ9v-HYti654EeeAkfucS5w4LsYEtlELcdIU5_Sa4g_vnC33Q3O4pFy0A1j4ujbKfGd6_fxgF2w0w6HkT69xXP2_P3m6fouWz_c3l9_W2e2UHXKulwWpRUgETopBSrSeUOFok42FREi6lzpFsqqkbYA0RQt5dBKnXdUqbJU5-zrUXe3b7bUWvIp4mB2cTo2_jIBnfkf8W5j-vDTaBBalzAJrI4CNoZxjNS9cwWY2QYz22BmG8xsw0T4_O_G9_G_f1d_AIh8iJ4</recordid><startdate>20200316</startdate><enddate>20200316</enddate><creator>Lawler, Joshua J</creator><creator>Rinnan, D Scott</creator><creator>Michalak, Julia L</creator><creator>Withey, John C</creator><creator>Randels, Christopher R</creator><creator>Possingham, Hugh P</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9686-8450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8306-3175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2524-8390</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-6910</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7755-996X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200316</creationdate><title>Planning for climate change through additions to a national protected area network: implications for cost and configuration</title><author>Lawler, Joshua J ; Rinnan, D Scott ; Michalak, Julia L ; Withey, John C ; Randels, Christopher R ; Possingham, Hugh P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-f4256c102a0f221a3e74be53ef2b8eeaaa7437d068b2c501b5de40d274fe83663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal Distribution</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Climate Change - economics</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - economics</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Parks, Recreational - economics</topic><topic>Plant Dispersal</topic><topic>Refugium</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lawler, Joshua J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinnan, D Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michalak, Julia L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Withey, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randels, Christopher R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Possingham, Hugh P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lawler, Joshua J</au><au>Rinnan, D Scott</au><au>Michalak, Julia L</au><au>Withey, John C</au><au>Randels, Christopher R</au><au>Possingham, Hugh P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Planning for climate change through additions to a national protected area network: implications for cost and configuration</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2020-03-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>375</volume><issue>1794</issue><spage>20190117</spage><pages>20190117-</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>Expanding the network of protected areas is a core strategy for conserving biodiversity in the face of climate change. Here, we explore the impacts on reserve network cost and configuration associated with planning for climate change in the USA using networks that prioritize areas projected to be climatically suitable for 1460 species both today and into the future, climatic refugia and areas likely to facilitate climate-driven species movements. For 14% of the species, networks of sites selected solely to protect areas currently climatically suitable failed to provide climatically suitable habitat in the future. Protecting sites climatically suitable for species today and in the future significantly changed the distribution of priority sites across the USA-increasing relative protection in the northeast, northwest and central USA. Protecting areas projected to retain their climatic suitability for species cost 59% more than solely protecting currently suitable areas. Including all climatic refugia and 20% of areas that facilitate climate-driven movements increased the cost by another 18%. Our results indicate that protecting some types of climatic refugia may be a relatively inexpensive adaptation strategy. Moreover, although addressing climate change in conservation plans will have significant implications for the configuration of networks, the increased cost of doing so may be relatively modest. This article is part of the theme issue 'Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions'.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>31983335</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2019.0117</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9686-8450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8306-3175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2524-8390</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-6910</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7755-996X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8436
ispartof Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2020-03, Vol.375 (1794), p.20190117
issn 0962-8436
1471-2970
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7017760
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central
subjects Animal Distribution
Biodiversity
Climate Change - economics
Conservation of Natural Resources - economics
Conservation of Natural Resources - methods
Parks, Recreational - economics
Plant Dispersal
Refugium
United States
title Planning for climate change through additions to a national protected area network: implications for cost and configuration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T01%3A45%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Planning%20for%20climate%20change%20through%20additions%20to%20a%20national%20protected%20area%20network:%20implications%20for%20cost%20and%20configuration&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Lawler,%20Joshua%20J&rft.date=2020-03-16&rft.volume=375&rft.issue=1794&rft.spage=20190117&rft.pages=20190117-&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2019.0117&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E31983335%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/31983335&rfr_iscdi=true