How cancer supportive and palliative care is developed: Comparing the policy-making process in three countries from three continents
Background: Supportive and palliative care worldwide is recognized as one of the six main cancer control bases and plays an important role in managing the complications of cancer. Limited studies have been published in the field of this policy analysis in the world. Aim: This study aimed to analysis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indian journal of palliative care 2020-01, Vol.26 (1), p.72-79 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 79 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 72 |
container_title | Indian journal of palliative care |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Alikhani, Mahtab Vatankhah, Soudabeh Gorji, Hasan Ravaghi, Hamid |
description | Background: Supportive and palliative care worldwide is recognized as one of the six main cancer control bases and plays an important role in managing the complications of cancer. Limited studies have been published in the field of this policy analysis in the world. Aim: This study aimed to analysis the policy-making process of supportive and palliative cancer care in three countries. Methodology: This qualitative study is a part of a comparative study. The data were collected through reviewing scientific and administrative documents, the World Health Organization website and reports, government websites, and other authoritative websites. Searches were done through texts in English and valid databases, in the period between 2000 and 2018. To investigate the policy process, heuristic stages model is implemented consisting of the four stages: agenda setting, policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy evaluation. Results: The findings of the study were categorized based on the conceptual model used in four areas related to the policy process, including agenda setting, policy formulation, policy implementation, and evaluation of cancer palliative care policies. Conclusion: Several factors are involved in how cancer palliative care policy is included in policy-makers' agenda, understanding a necessity, raising public awareness, and acceptance as a result of sensing the physical and nonphysical care outcomes. The stages of development, implementation, and evaluation of palliative care in countries regardless of existing differences are a function of the health system and context of each country. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_55_19 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7017679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A613020797</galeid><sourcerecordid>A613020797</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625i-f8f0c45b34e49484973c1cbaa599401c843e609103231880ddb9608c040328b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ksFv0zAUxiMEYqVw5oYsISEu6ew4iWMOSFMFbDAJDnC2HOel9erYwU5a7c4fjttu3YqKLNny8-999nv-kuQ1wbOcYHp-9fXHfLadRFEIwp8kE8J5lVJGi6fJBHNGU4JZcZa8COEG4zznJX-enNGM0IxVfJL8uXQbpKRV4FEY-975Qa8BSdugXhqj5W6rpAekA2pgDcb10HxAc9f10mu7QMMSUO-MVrdpJ1fbSO-dghCQtvHQQ8x3ox28hoBa77pD0A7agh3Cy-RZK02AV3frNPn1-dPP-WV6_f3L1fziOlVlVui0rVqs8qKmOeQ8r_JYnSKqlrLgPMdEVTmFEvPYl4ySqsJNU_MSVwrnMVLVBZ0mH_e6_Vh30Kh4t5dG9F530t8KJ7U4PrF6KRZuLRgmrGQ8Cry_E_Du9whhEJ0OCoyRFtwYREYZqQpGdujbf9AbN3oby4tUgTMa_wk_UAtpQGjbuniv2oqKi5JQnGEWq5wm6QlqARbiI52FVsfwET87wcfRQKfVyYR3jxKWIM2wDM6Mg3Y2HIPne1B5F4KH9tA8gsXWkWJnxgdHxow3j3t-4O8tGIFve2DjzAA-rMy4AS8iu7Ju8z9dwTIRrSv21hX31qV_AbRA9rU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2350239980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How cancer supportive and palliative care is developed: Comparing the policy-making process in three countries from three continents</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Alikhani, Mahtab ; Vatankhah, Soudabeh ; Gorji, Hasan ; Ravaghi, Hamid</creator><creatorcontrib>Alikhani, Mahtab ; Vatankhah, Soudabeh ; Gorji, Hasan ; Ravaghi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Supportive and palliative care worldwide is recognized as one of the six main cancer control bases and plays an important role in managing the complications of cancer. Limited studies have been published in the field of this policy analysis in the world. Aim: This study aimed to analysis the policy-making process of supportive and palliative cancer care in three countries. Methodology: This qualitative study is a part of a comparative study. The data were collected through reviewing scientific and administrative documents, the World Health Organization website and reports, government websites, and other authoritative websites. Searches were done through texts in English and valid databases, in the period between 2000 and 2018. To investigate the policy process, heuristic stages model is implemented consisting of the four stages: agenda setting, policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy evaluation. Results: The findings of the study were categorized based on the conceptual model used in four areas related to the policy process, including agenda setting, policy formulation, policy implementation, and evaluation of cancer palliative care policies. Conclusion: Several factors are involved in how cancer palliative care policy is included in policy-makers' agenda, understanding a necessity, raising public awareness, and acceptance as a result of sensing the physical and nonphysical care outcomes. The stages of development, implementation, and evaluation of palliative care in countries regardless of existing differences are a function of the health system and context of each country.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0973-1075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_55_19</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32132789</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Cancer research ; Comparative literature ; Government computer systems ; Health care policy ; Heuristic ; Hospice care ; Hospitals ; Original ; Palliative care ; Public health ; Public policy ; Qualitative research ; Quality of life</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of palliative care, 2020-01, Vol.26 (1), p.72-79</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Palliative Care.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Palliative Care 2020</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625i-f8f0c45b34e49484973c1cbaa599401c843e609103231880ddb9608c040328b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c625i-f8f0c45b34e49484973c1cbaa599401c843e609103231880ddb9608c040328b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7017679/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7017679/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32132789$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alikhani, Mahtab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vatankhah, Soudabeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorji, Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravaghi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><title>How cancer supportive and palliative care is developed: Comparing the policy-making process in three countries from three continents</title><title>Indian journal of palliative care</title><addtitle>Indian J Palliat Care</addtitle><description>Background: Supportive and palliative care worldwide is recognized as one of the six main cancer control bases and plays an important role in managing the complications of cancer. Limited studies have been published in the field of this policy analysis in the world. Aim: This study aimed to analysis the policy-making process of supportive and palliative cancer care in three countries. Methodology: This qualitative study is a part of a comparative study. The data were collected through reviewing scientific and administrative documents, the World Health Organization website and reports, government websites, and other authoritative websites. Searches were done through texts in English and valid databases, in the period between 2000 and 2018. To investigate the policy process, heuristic stages model is implemented consisting of the four stages: agenda setting, policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy evaluation. Results: The findings of the study were categorized based on the conceptual model used in four areas related to the policy process, including agenda setting, policy formulation, policy implementation, and evaluation of cancer palliative care policies. Conclusion: Several factors are involved in how cancer palliative care policy is included in policy-makers' agenda, understanding a necessity, raising public awareness, and acceptance as a result of sensing the physical and nonphysical care outcomes. The stages of development, implementation, and evaluation of palliative care in countries regardless of existing differences are a function of the health system and context of each country.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Comparative literature</subject><subject>Government computer systems</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>Hospice care</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><issn>0973-1075</issn><issn>1998-3735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ksFv0zAUxiMEYqVw5oYsISEu6ew4iWMOSFMFbDAJDnC2HOel9erYwU5a7c4fjttu3YqKLNny8-999nv-kuQ1wbOcYHp-9fXHfLadRFEIwp8kE8J5lVJGi6fJBHNGU4JZcZa8COEG4zznJX-enNGM0IxVfJL8uXQbpKRV4FEY-975Qa8BSdugXhqj5W6rpAekA2pgDcb10HxAc9f10mu7QMMSUO-MVrdpJ1fbSO-dghCQtvHQQ8x3ox28hoBa77pD0A7agh3Cy-RZK02AV3frNPn1-dPP-WV6_f3L1fziOlVlVui0rVqs8qKmOeQ8r_JYnSKqlrLgPMdEVTmFEvPYl4ySqsJNU_MSVwrnMVLVBZ0mH_e6_Vh30Kh4t5dG9F530t8KJ7U4PrF6KRZuLRgmrGQ8Cry_E_Du9whhEJ0OCoyRFtwYREYZqQpGdujbf9AbN3oby4tUgTMa_wk_UAtpQGjbuniv2oqKi5JQnGEWq5wm6QlqARbiI52FVsfwET87wcfRQKfVyYR3jxKWIM2wDM6Mg3Y2HIPne1B5F4KH9tA8gsXWkWJnxgdHxow3j3t-4O8tGIFve2DjzAA-rMy4AS8iu7Ju8z9dwTIRrSv21hX31qV_AbRA9rU</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Alikhani, Mahtab</creator><creator>Vatankhah, Soudabeh</creator><creator>Gorji, Hasan</creator><creator>Ravaghi, Hamid</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Scientific Scholar</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>How cancer supportive and palliative care is developed: Comparing the policy-making process in three countries from three continents</title><author>Alikhani, Mahtab ; Vatankhah, Soudabeh ; Gorji, Hasan ; Ravaghi, Hamid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c625i-f8f0c45b34e49484973c1cbaa599401c843e609103231880ddb9608c040328b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Comparative literature</topic><topic>Government computer systems</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>Hospice care</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alikhani, Mahtab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vatankhah, Soudabeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorji, Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravaghi, Hamid</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of palliative care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alikhani, Mahtab</au><au>Vatankhah, Soudabeh</au><au>Gorji, Hasan</au><au>Ravaghi, Hamid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How cancer supportive and palliative care is developed: Comparing the policy-making process in three countries from three continents</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of palliative care</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Palliat Care</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>72-79</pages><issn>0973-1075</issn><eissn>1998-3735</eissn><abstract>Background: Supportive and palliative care worldwide is recognized as one of the six main cancer control bases and plays an important role in managing the complications of cancer. Limited studies have been published in the field of this policy analysis in the world. Aim: This study aimed to analysis the policy-making process of supportive and palliative cancer care in three countries. Methodology: This qualitative study is a part of a comparative study. The data were collected through reviewing scientific and administrative documents, the World Health Organization website and reports, government websites, and other authoritative websites. Searches were done through texts in English and valid databases, in the period between 2000 and 2018. To investigate the policy process, heuristic stages model is implemented consisting of the four stages: agenda setting, policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy evaluation. Results: The findings of the study were categorized based on the conceptual model used in four areas related to the policy process, including agenda setting, policy formulation, policy implementation, and evaluation of cancer palliative care policies. Conclusion: Several factors are involved in how cancer palliative care policy is included in policy-makers' agenda, understanding a necessity, raising public awareness, and acceptance as a result of sensing the physical and nonphysical care outcomes. The stages of development, implementation, and evaluation of palliative care in countries regardless of existing differences are a function of the health system and context of each country.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>32132789</pmid><doi>10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_55_19</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0973-1075 |
ispartof | Indian journal of palliative care, 2020-01, Vol.26 (1), p.72-79 |
issn | 0973-1075 1998-3735 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7017679 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Cancer Cancer research Comparative literature Government computer systems Health care policy Heuristic Hospice care Hospitals Original Palliative care Public health Public policy Qualitative research Quality of life |
title | How cancer supportive and palliative care is developed: Comparing the policy-making process in three countries from three continents |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T16%3A23%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20cancer%20supportive%20and%20palliative%20care%20is%20developed:%20Comparing%20the%20policy-making%20process%20in%20three%20countries%20from%20three%20continents&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20palliative%20care&rft.au=Alikhani,%20Mahtab&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=72-79&rft.issn=0973-1075&rft.eissn=1998-3735&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_55_19&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA613020797%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2350239980&rft_id=info:pmid/32132789&rft_galeid=A613020797&rfr_iscdi=true |