Correlations Between Different Choriocapillaris Flow Deficit Parameters in Normal Eyes Using Swept Source OCT Angiography

Choriocapillaris (CC) imaging of normal eyes with swept-source optical coherence tomographic angiography (SS-OCTA) was performed, and the percentage of CC flow deficits (FD%) and the average area of CC flow deficits (FDa) were compared within the given macular regions. A prospective, cross-sectional...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 2020-01, Vol.209, p.18-26
Hauptverfasser: Shi, Yingying, Zhang, Qinqin, Zheng, Fang, Russell, Jonathan F., Motulsky, Elie H., Banta, James T., Chu, Zhongdi, Zhou, Hao, Patel, Nimesh A., de Sisternes, Luis, Durbin, Mary K., Feuer, William, Gregori, Giovanni, Wang, Ruikang K., Rosenfeld, Philip J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26
container_issue
container_start_page 18
container_title American journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 209
creator Shi, Yingying
Zhang, Qinqin
Zheng, Fang
Russell, Jonathan F.
Motulsky, Elie H.
Banta, James T.
Chu, Zhongdi
Zhou, Hao
Patel, Nimesh A.
de Sisternes, Luis
Durbin, Mary K.
Feuer, William
Gregori, Giovanni
Wang, Ruikang K.
Rosenfeld, Philip J.
description Choriocapillaris (CC) imaging of normal eyes with swept-source optical coherence tomographic angiography (SS-OCTA) was performed, and the percentage of CC flow deficits (FD%) and the average area of CC flow deficits (FDa) were compared within the given macular regions. A prospective, cross-sectional study. Subjects with normal eyes ranging in age from their 20s through their 80s were imaged with SS-OCTA (PLEX Elite 9000; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA) using both 3×3-mm and 6×6-mm macular scan patterns. The CC images were generated using a previously published and validated algorithm. In both 3×3-mm and 6×6-mm scans, the CC FD% and FDa were measured in circular regions centered on the fovea with diameters as 1 mm and 2.5 mm (C1 and C2.5). In 6×6-mm scans, the FD% and FDa were measured within an additional circular region with diameter as 5 mm (C5). The correlations between FD% and FDa from each region were analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficients. A total of 164 eyes were analyzed. There was excellent correlation between CC FDa and FD% measurements from each region. In the 3×3-mm scans, the correlations in the C1 and C2.5 regions were 0.83 and 0.90, respectively. In the 6×6-mm scans, the correlations in C1, C2.5, and C5 regions were 0.90, 0.89, and 0.89, respectively. When measuring CC FDs, we found excellent correlations between FDa and FD% in regions from 3×3-mm and 6×6-mm scans. Further studies are needed to determine if one parameter is more useful when studying diseased eyes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.09.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7017580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002939419304751</els_id><sourcerecordid>2299134437</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-e8f4272d723aef5cd654dcbde77260e04b3c9b22238ba4833be81903c4b475323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModq1-AF8k4Isvs-bfTCYIQp22KhQrtH0Omcyd3QwzyTaZ7bLf3ixbi_ogXAghvxzuOQeht5QsKaHVx2FphrBkhKolyUPlM7SgtVQFrRV9jhaEEFYorsQJepXSkK-VFPIlOuG0rFhd1gu0b0KMMJrZBZ_wF5h3AB6fu76HCH7GzTpEF6zZuHE00SV8OYYdPofeWTfjnyaaCWaICTuPf4Q4mRFf7CHhu-T8Ct_sYDPjm7CNFvB1c4vP_MqFVTSb9f41etGbMcGbx_MU3V1e3Dbfiqvrr9-bs6vCCqnmAupeMMk6ybiBvrRdVYrOth1IySoCRLTcqpYxxuvWiJrzFmqqCLeiFbLkjJ-iz0fdzbadoLPZVTSj3kQ3mbjXwTj994t3a70KD1rmQMuaZIEPjwIx3G8hzXpyyULOw0PYJs2YUpQLwWVG3_-DDtm7z_Y0y6twlTOnmaJHysaQUoT-aRlK9KFYPehcrD4Uq0keelB-96eLpx-_m8zApyMAOcsHB1En68Bb6FwEO-suuP_I_wKvXrVO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2323398581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlations Between Different Choriocapillaris Flow Deficit Parameters in Normal Eyes Using Swept Source OCT Angiography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Shi, Yingying ; Zhang, Qinqin ; Zheng, Fang ; Russell, Jonathan F. ; Motulsky, Elie H. ; Banta, James T. ; Chu, Zhongdi ; Zhou, Hao ; Patel, Nimesh A. ; de Sisternes, Luis ; Durbin, Mary K. ; Feuer, William ; Gregori, Giovanni ; Wang, Ruikang K. ; Rosenfeld, Philip J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yingying ; Zhang, Qinqin ; Zheng, Fang ; Russell, Jonathan F. ; Motulsky, Elie H. ; Banta, James T. ; Chu, Zhongdi ; Zhou, Hao ; Patel, Nimesh A. ; de Sisternes, Luis ; Durbin, Mary K. ; Feuer, William ; Gregori, Giovanni ; Wang, Ruikang K. ; Rosenfeld, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><description>Choriocapillaris (CC) imaging of normal eyes with swept-source optical coherence tomographic angiography (SS-OCTA) was performed, and the percentage of CC flow deficits (FD%) and the average area of CC flow deficits (FDa) were compared within the given macular regions. A prospective, cross-sectional study. Subjects with normal eyes ranging in age from their 20s through their 80s were imaged with SS-OCTA (PLEX Elite 9000; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA) using both 3×3-mm and 6×6-mm macular scan patterns. The CC images were generated using a previously published and validated algorithm. In both 3×3-mm and 6×6-mm scans, the CC FD% and FDa were measured in circular regions centered on the fovea with diameters as 1 mm and 2.5 mm (C1 and C2.5). In 6×6-mm scans, the FD% and FDa were measured within an additional circular region with diameter as 5 mm (C5). The correlations between FD% and FDa from each region were analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficients. A total of 164 eyes were analyzed. There was excellent correlation between CC FDa and FD% measurements from each region. In the 3×3-mm scans, the correlations in the C1 and C2.5 regions were 0.83 and 0.90, respectively. In the 6×6-mm scans, the correlations in C1, C2.5, and C5 regions were 0.90, 0.89, and 0.89, respectively. When measuring CC FDs, we found excellent correlations between FDa and FD% in regions from 3×3-mm and 6×6-mm scans. Further studies are needed to determine if one parameter is more useful when studying diseased eyes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.09.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31562858</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Algorithms ; Blood Flow Velocity - physiology ; Choroid - blood supply ; Choroid - diagnostic imaging ; Ciliary Arteries - diagnostic imaging ; Ciliary Arteries - physiology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diabetes ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Disease ; Female ; Fluorescein Angiography - methods ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Macular degeneration ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Prospective Studies ; Regional Blood Flow - physiology ; Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>American journal of ophthalmology, 2020-01, Vol.209, p.18-26</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2019. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-e8f4272d723aef5cd654dcbde77260e04b3c9b22238ba4833be81903c4b475323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-e8f4272d723aef5cd654dcbde77260e04b3c9b22238ba4833be81903c4b475323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.09.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31562858$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yingying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qinqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Jonathan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motulsky, Elie H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banta, James T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Zhongdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Nimesh A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sisternes, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durbin, Mary K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feuer, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregori, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ruikang K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><title>Correlations Between Different Choriocapillaris Flow Deficit Parameters in Normal Eyes Using Swept Source OCT Angiography</title><title>American journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Choriocapillaris (CC) imaging of normal eyes with swept-source optical coherence tomographic angiography (SS-OCTA) was performed, and the percentage of CC flow deficits (FD%) and the average area of CC flow deficits (FDa) were compared within the given macular regions. A prospective, cross-sectional study. Subjects with normal eyes ranging in age from their 20s through their 80s were imaged with SS-OCTA (PLEX Elite 9000; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA) using both 3×3-mm and 6×6-mm macular scan patterns. The CC images were generated using a previously published and validated algorithm. In both 3×3-mm and 6×6-mm scans, the CC FD% and FDa were measured in circular regions centered on the fovea with diameters as 1 mm and 2.5 mm (C1 and C2.5). In 6×6-mm scans, the FD% and FDa were measured within an additional circular region with diameter as 5 mm (C5). The correlations between FD% and FDa from each region were analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficients. A total of 164 eyes were analyzed. There was excellent correlation between CC FDa and FD% measurements from each region. In the 3×3-mm scans, the correlations in the C1 and C2.5 regions were 0.83 and 0.90, respectively. In the 6×6-mm scans, the correlations in C1, C2.5, and C5 regions were 0.90, 0.89, and 0.89, respectively. When measuring CC FDs, we found excellent correlations between FDa and FD% in regions from 3×3-mm and 6×6-mm scans. Further studies are needed to determine if one parameter is more useful when studying diseased eyes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</subject><subject>Choroid - blood supply</subject><subject>Choroid - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ciliary Arteries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ciliary Arteries - physiology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorescein Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Macular degeneration</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Regional Blood Flow - physiology</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModq1-AF8k4Isvs-bfTCYIQp22KhQrtH0Omcyd3QwzyTaZ7bLf3ixbi_ogXAghvxzuOQeht5QsKaHVx2FphrBkhKolyUPlM7SgtVQFrRV9jhaEEFYorsQJepXSkK-VFPIlOuG0rFhd1gu0b0KMMJrZBZ_wF5h3AB6fu76HCH7GzTpEF6zZuHE00SV8OYYdPofeWTfjnyaaCWaICTuPf4Q4mRFf7CHhu-T8Ct_sYDPjm7CNFvB1c4vP_MqFVTSb9f41etGbMcGbx_MU3V1e3Dbfiqvrr9-bs6vCCqnmAupeMMk6ybiBvrRdVYrOth1IySoCRLTcqpYxxuvWiJrzFmqqCLeiFbLkjJ-iz0fdzbadoLPZVTSj3kQ3mbjXwTj994t3a70KD1rmQMuaZIEPjwIx3G8hzXpyyULOw0PYJs2YUpQLwWVG3_-DDtm7z_Y0y6twlTOnmaJHysaQUoT-aRlK9KFYPehcrD4Uq0keelB-96eLpx-_m8zApyMAOcsHB1En68Bb6FwEO-suuP_I_wKvXrVO</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Shi, Yingying</creator><creator>Zhang, Qinqin</creator><creator>Zheng, Fang</creator><creator>Russell, Jonathan F.</creator><creator>Motulsky, Elie H.</creator><creator>Banta, James T.</creator><creator>Chu, Zhongdi</creator><creator>Zhou, Hao</creator><creator>Patel, Nimesh A.</creator><creator>de Sisternes, Luis</creator><creator>Durbin, Mary K.</creator><creator>Feuer, William</creator><creator>Gregori, Giovanni</creator><creator>Wang, Ruikang K.</creator><creator>Rosenfeld, Philip J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Correlations Between Different Choriocapillaris Flow Deficit Parameters in Normal Eyes Using Swept Source OCT Angiography</title><author>Shi, Yingying ; Zhang, Qinqin ; Zheng, Fang ; Russell, Jonathan F. ; Motulsky, Elie H. ; Banta, James T. ; Chu, Zhongdi ; Zhou, Hao ; Patel, Nimesh A. ; de Sisternes, Luis ; Durbin, Mary K. ; Feuer, William ; Gregori, Giovanni ; Wang, Ruikang K. ; Rosenfeld, Philip J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-e8f4272d723aef5cd654dcbde77260e04b3c9b22238ba4833be81903c4b475323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</topic><topic>Choroid - blood supply</topic><topic>Choroid - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ciliary Arteries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ciliary Arteries - physiology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorescein Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Macular degeneration</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Regional Blood Flow - physiology</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yingying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Qinqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Jonathan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motulsky, Elie H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banta, James T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Zhongdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Nimesh A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sisternes, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durbin, Mary K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feuer, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregori, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ruikang K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shi, Yingying</au><au>Zhang, Qinqin</au><au>Zheng, Fang</au><au>Russell, Jonathan F.</au><au>Motulsky, Elie H.</au><au>Banta, James T.</au><au>Chu, Zhongdi</au><au>Zhou, Hao</au><au>Patel, Nimesh A.</au><au>de Sisternes, Luis</au><au>Durbin, Mary K.</au><au>Feuer, William</au><au>Gregori, Giovanni</au><au>Wang, Ruikang K.</au><au>Rosenfeld, Philip J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlations Between Different Choriocapillaris Flow Deficit Parameters in Normal Eyes Using Swept Source OCT Angiography</atitle><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>209</volume><spage>18</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>18-26</pages><issn>0002-9394</issn><eissn>1879-1891</eissn><abstract>Choriocapillaris (CC) imaging of normal eyes with swept-source optical coherence tomographic angiography (SS-OCTA) was performed, and the percentage of CC flow deficits (FD%) and the average area of CC flow deficits (FDa) were compared within the given macular regions. A prospective, cross-sectional study. Subjects with normal eyes ranging in age from their 20s through their 80s were imaged with SS-OCTA (PLEX Elite 9000; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA) using both 3×3-mm and 6×6-mm macular scan patterns. The CC images were generated using a previously published and validated algorithm. In both 3×3-mm and 6×6-mm scans, the CC FD% and FDa were measured in circular regions centered on the fovea with diameters as 1 mm and 2.5 mm (C1 and C2.5). In 6×6-mm scans, the FD% and FDa were measured within an additional circular region with diameter as 5 mm (C5). The correlations between FD% and FDa from each region were analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficients. A total of 164 eyes were analyzed. There was excellent correlation between CC FDa and FD% measurements from each region. In the 3×3-mm scans, the correlations in the C1 and C2.5 regions were 0.83 and 0.90, respectively. In the 6×6-mm scans, the correlations in C1, C2.5, and C5 regions were 0.90, 0.89, and 0.89, respectively. When measuring CC FDs, we found excellent correlations between FDa and FD% in regions from 3×3-mm and 6×6-mm scans. Further studies are needed to determine if one parameter is more useful when studying diseased eyes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31562858</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajo.2019.09.017</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9394
ispartof American journal of ophthalmology, 2020-01, Vol.209, p.18-26
issn 0002-9394
1879-1891
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7017580
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Age
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Blood Flow Velocity - physiology
Choroid - blood supply
Choroid - diagnostic imaging
Ciliary Arteries - diagnostic imaging
Ciliary Arteries - physiology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diabetes
Diabetic retinopathy
Disease
Female
Fluorescein Angiography - methods
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Macular degeneration
Male
Medical imaging
Middle Aged
Ophthalmology
Prospective Studies
Regional Blood Flow - physiology
Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods
Young Adult
title Correlations Between Different Choriocapillaris Flow Deficit Parameters in Normal Eyes Using Swept Source OCT Angiography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T02%3A47%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlations%20Between%20Different%20Choriocapillaris%20Flow%20Deficit%20Parameters%20in%20Normal%20Eyes%20Using%20Swept%20Source%20OCT%20Angiography&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Shi,%20Yingying&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=209&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=18-26&rft.issn=0002-9394&rft.eissn=1879-1891&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.09.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2299134437%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2323398581&rft_id=info:pmid/31562858&rft_els_id=S0002939419304751&rfr_iscdi=true