Jet aeration as alternative to overcome mass transfer limitation of stirred bioreactors
In industrial biotechnology increasing reactor volumes have the potential to reduce production costs. Whenever the achievable space time yield is determined by the mass transfer performance of the reactor, energy efficiency plays an important role to meet the requirements regarding low investment an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Engineering in life sciences 2018-04, Vol.18 (4), p.244-253 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 253 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 244 |
container_title | Engineering in life sciences |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Weber, Sebastian Schaepe, Sebastian Freyer, Stephan Kopf, Michael‐Helmut Dietzsch, Christian |
description | In industrial biotechnology increasing reactor volumes have the potential to reduce production costs. Whenever the achievable space time yield is determined by the mass transfer performance of the reactor, energy efficiency plays an important role to meet the requirements regarding low investment and operating costs. Based on theoretical calculations, compared to bubble column, airlift reactor, and aerated stirred tank, the jet loop reactor shows the potential for an enhanced energetic efficiency at high mass transfer rates. Interestingly, its technical application in standard biotechnological production processes has not yet been realized. Compared to a stirred tank reactor powered by Rushton turbines, maximum oxygen transfer rates about 200% higher were achieved in a jet loop reactor at identical power input in a fed batch fermentation process. Moreover, a model‐based analysis of yield coefficients and growth kinetics showed that E. coli can be cultivated in jet loop reactors without significant differences in biomass growth. Based on an aerobic fermentation process, the assessment of energetic oxygen transfer efficiency [kgO2 kW−1 h−1] for a jet loop reactor yielded an improvement of almost 100%. The jet loop reactor could be operated at mass transfer rates 67% higher compared to a stirred tank. Thus, an increase of 40% in maximum space time yield [kg m−3 h−1] could be observed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/elsc.201700169 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6999413</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2420622981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4491-bd943d82f0f7e048cc5df0c6aed734c50f5dc21aa926dc08d02ed786509eb533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUUtLAzEQDqL4vnrO0UvrJJtNk4sgxScFDxY8hjSZ1cjuRpO04r93S0vBk6eZ4XsNfIRcMBgzAH6FbXZjDmwCwKTeI8dMMjXiSlb72x24gCNykvPHQJkoxQ7JUcUlFxqqY_L6hIVaTLaE2FObqW0Lpn44V0hLpHGFycUOaWdzpiXZPjeYaBu6UDaa2NBcQkro6SLEhNaVmPIZOWhsm_F8O0_J_O52Pn0YzZ7vH6c3s5ETQrPRwmtRecUbaCYIQjlX-wactOgnlXA1NLV3nFmrufQOlAc-IErWoHFRV9Upud7Yfi4XHXqH_fBiaz5T6Gz6MdEG8xfpw7t5iysjtdaCrQ0utwYpfi0xF9OF7LBtbY9xmQ0XHCTnWrGBOt5QXYo5J2x2MQzMugyzLsPsyhgEYiP4Di3-_MM2t7OXKYMh5xeEoo62</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2420622981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Jet aeration as alternative to overcome mass transfer limitation of stirred bioreactors</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Weber, Sebastian ; Schaepe, Sebastian ; Freyer, Stephan ; Kopf, Michael‐Helmut ; Dietzsch, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Weber, Sebastian ; Schaepe, Sebastian ; Freyer, Stephan ; Kopf, Michael‐Helmut ; Dietzsch, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>In industrial biotechnology increasing reactor volumes have the potential to reduce production costs. Whenever the achievable space time yield is determined by the mass transfer performance of the reactor, energy efficiency plays an important role to meet the requirements regarding low investment and operating costs. Based on theoretical calculations, compared to bubble column, airlift reactor, and aerated stirred tank, the jet loop reactor shows the potential for an enhanced energetic efficiency at high mass transfer rates. Interestingly, its technical application in standard biotechnological production processes has not yet been realized. Compared to a stirred tank reactor powered by Rushton turbines, maximum oxygen transfer rates about 200% higher were achieved in a jet loop reactor at identical power input in a fed batch fermentation process. Moreover, a model‐based analysis of yield coefficients and growth kinetics showed that E. coli can be cultivated in jet loop reactors without significant differences in biomass growth. Based on an aerobic fermentation process, the assessment of energetic oxygen transfer efficiency [kgO2 kW−1 h−1] for a jet loop reactor yielded an improvement of almost 100%. The jet loop reactor could be operated at mass transfer rates 67% higher compared to a stirred tank. Thus, an increase of 40% in maximum space time yield [kg m−3 h−1] could be observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-0240</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-2863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/elsc.201700169</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32624903</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons Inc</publisher><subject>Aerobic bioprocess ; Energetic efficiency ; Jet loop reactor ; Mass transfer performance ; Productivity</subject><ispartof>Engineering in life sciences, 2018-04, Vol.18 (4), p.244-253</ispartof><rights>2018 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4491-bd943d82f0f7e048cc5df0c6aed734c50f5dc21aa926dc08d02ed786509eb533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4491-bd943d82f0f7e048cc5df0c6aed734c50f5dc21aa926dc08d02ed786509eb533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999413/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999413/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,1418,27928,27929,45578,45579,53795,53797</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weber, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaepe, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freyer, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopf, Michael‐Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietzsch, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Jet aeration as alternative to overcome mass transfer limitation of stirred bioreactors</title><title>Engineering in life sciences</title><description>In industrial biotechnology increasing reactor volumes have the potential to reduce production costs. Whenever the achievable space time yield is determined by the mass transfer performance of the reactor, energy efficiency plays an important role to meet the requirements regarding low investment and operating costs. Based on theoretical calculations, compared to bubble column, airlift reactor, and aerated stirred tank, the jet loop reactor shows the potential for an enhanced energetic efficiency at high mass transfer rates. Interestingly, its technical application in standard biotechnological production processes has not yet been realized. Compared to a stirred tank reactor powered by Rushton turbines, maximum oxygen transfer rates about 200% higher were achieved in a jet loop reactor at identical power input in a fed batch fermentation process. Moreover, a model‐based analysis of yield coefficients and growth kinetics showed that E. coli can be cultivated in jet loop reactors without significant differences in biomass growth. Based on an aerobic fermentation process, the assessment of energetic oxygen transfer efficiency [kgO2 kW−1 h−1] for a jet loop reactor yielded an improvement of almost 100%. The jet loop reactor could be operated at mass transfer rates 67% higher compared to a stirred tank. Thus, an increase of 40% in maximum space time yield [kg m−3 h−1] could be observed.</description><subject>Aerobic bioprocess</subject><subject>Energetic efficiency</subject><subject>Jet loop reactor</subject><subject>Mass transfer performance</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><issn>1618-0240</issn><issn>1618-2863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUUtLAzEQDqL4vnrO0UvrJJtNk4sgxScFDxY8hjSZ1cjuRpO04r93S0vBk6eZ4XsNfIRcMBgzAH6FbXZjDmwCwKTeI8dMMjXiSlb72x24gCNykvPHQJkoxQ7JUcUlFxqqY_L6hIVaTLaE2FObqW0Lpn44V0hLpHGFycUOaWdzpiXZPjeYaBu6UDaa2NBcQkro6SLEhNaVmPIZOWhsm_F8O0_J_O52Pn0YzZ7vH6c3s5ETQrPRwmtRecUbaCYIQjlX-wactOgnlXA1NLV3nFmrufQOlAc-IErWoHFRV9Upud7Yfi4XHXqH_fBiaz5T6Gz6MdEG8xfpw7t5iysjtdaCrQ0utwYpfi0xF9OF7LBtbY9xmQ0XHCTnWrGBOt5QXYo5J2x2MQzMugyzLsPsyhgEYiP4Di3-_MM2t7OXKYMh5xeEoo62</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Weber, Sebastian</creator><creator>Schaepe, Sebastian</creator><creator>Freyer, Stephan</creator><creator>Kopf, Michael‐Helmut</creator><creator>Dietzsch, Christian</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Jet aeration as alternative to overcome mass transfer limitation of stirred bioreactors</title><author>Weber, Sebastian ; Schaepe, Sebastian ; Freyer, Stephan ; Kopf, Michael‐Helmut ; Dietzsch, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4491-bd943d82f0f7e048cc5df0c6aed734c50f5dc21aa926dc08d02ed786509eb533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aerobic bioprocess</topic><topic>Energetic efficiency</topic><topic>Jet loop reactor</topic><topic>Mass transfer performance</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weber, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaepe, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freyer, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopf, Michael‐Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietzsch, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Engineering in life sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weber, Sebastian</au><au>Schaepe, Sebastian</au><au>Freyer, Stephan</au><au>Kopf, Michael‐Helmut</au><au>Dietzsch, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Jet aeration as alternative to overcome mass transfer limitation of stirred bioreactors</atitle><jtitle>Engineering in life sciences</jtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>244</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>244-253</pages><issn>1618-0240</issn><eissn>1618-2863</eissn><abstract>In industrial biotechnology increasing reactor volumes have the potential to reduce production costs. Whenever the achievable space time yield is determined by the mass transfer performance of the reactor, energy efficiency plays an important role to meet the requirements regarding low investment and operating costs. Based on theoretical calculations, compared to bubble column, airlift reactor, and aerated stirred tank, the jet loop reactor shows the potential for an enhanced energetic efficiency at high mass transfer rates. Interestingly, its technical application in standard biotechnological production processes has not yet been realized. Compared to a stirred tank reactor powered by Rushton turbines, maximum oxygen transfer rates about 200% higher were achieved in a jet loop reactor at identical power input in a fed batch fermentation process. Moreover, a model‐based analysis of yield coefficients and growth kinetics showed that E. coli can be cultivated in jet loop reactors without significant differences in biomass growth. Based on an aerobic fermentation process, the assessment of energetic oxygen transfer efficiency [kgO2 kW−1 h−1] for a jet loop reactor yielded an improvement of almost 100%. The jet loop reactor could be operated at mass transfer rates 67% higher compared to a stirred tank. Thus, an increase of 40% in maximum space time yield [kg m−3 h−1] could be observed.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons Inc</pub><pmid>32624903</pmid><doi>10.1002/elsc.201700169</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1618-0240 |
ispartof | Engineering in life sciences, 2018-04, Vol.18 (4), p.244-253 |
issn | 1618-0240 1618-2863 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6999413 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; PubMed Central |
subjects | Aerobic bioprocess Energetic efficiency Jet loop reactor Mass transfer performance Productivity |
title | Jet aeration as alternative to overcome mass transfer limitation of stirred bioreactors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T05%3A52%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Jet%20aeration%20as%20alternative%20to%20overcome%20mass%20transfer%20limitation%20of%20stirred%20bioreactors&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20in%20life%20sciences&rft.au=Weber,%20Sebastian&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=244&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=244-253&rft.issn=1618-0240&rft.eissn=1618-2863&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/elsc.201700169&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2420622981%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2420622981&rft_id=info:pmid/32624903&rfr_iscdi=true |