Jet aeration as alternative to overcome mass transfer limitation of stirred bioreactors

In industrial biotechnology increasing reactor volumes have the potential to reduce production costs. Whenever the achievable space time yield is determined by the mass transfer performance of the reactor, energy efficiency plays an important role to meet the requirements regarding low investment an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Engineering in life sciences 2018-04, Vol.18 (4), p.244-253
Hauptverfasser: Weber, Sebastian, Schaepe, Sebastian, Freyer, Stephan, Kopf, Michael‐Helmut, Dietzsch, Christian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 253
container_issue 4
container_start_page 244
container_title Engineering in life sciences
container_volume 18
creator Weber, Sebastian
Schaepe, Sebastian
Freyer, Stephan
Kopf, Michael‐Helmut
Dietzsch, Christian
description In industrial biotechnology increasing reactor volumes have the potential to reduce production costs. Whenever the achievable space time yield is determined by the mass transfer performance of the reactor, energy efficiency plays an important role to meet the requirements regarding low investment and operating costs. Based on theoretical calculations, compared to bubble column, airlift reactor, and aerated stirred tank, the jet loop reactor shows the potential for an enhanced energetic efficiency at high mass transfer rates. Interestingly, its technical application in standard biotechnological production processes has not yet been realized. Compared to a stirred tank reactor powered by Rushton turbines, maximum oxygen transfer rates about 200% higher were achieved in a jet loop reactor at identical power input in a fed batch fermentation process. Moreover, a model‐based analysis of yield coefficients and growth kinetics showed that E. coli can be cultivated in jet loop reactors without significant differences in biomass growth. Based on an aerobic fermentation process, the assessment of energetic oxygen transfer efficiency [kgO2 kW−1 h−1] for a jet loop reactor yielded an improvement of almost 100%. The jet loop reactor could be operated at mass transfer rates 67% higher compared to a stirred tank. Thus, an increase of 40% in maximum space time yield [kg m−3 h−1] could be observed.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/elsc.201700169
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6999413</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2420622981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4491-bd943d82f0f7e048cc5df0c6aed734c50f5dc21aa926dc08d02ed786509eb533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUUtLAzEQDqL4vnrO0UvrJJtNk4sgxScFDxY8hjSZ1cjuRpO04r93S0vBk6eZ4XsNfIRcMBgzAH6FbXZjDmwCwKTeI8dMMjXiSlb72x24gCNykvPHQJkoxQ7JUcUlFxqqY_L6hIVaTLaE2FObqW0Lpn44V0hLpHGFycUOaWdzpiXZPjeYaBu6UDaa2NBcQkro6SLEhNaVmPIZOWhsm_F8O0_J_O52Pn0YzZ7vH6c3s5ETQrPRwmtRecUbaCYIQjlX-wactOgnlXA1NLV3nFmrufQOlAc-IErWoHFRV9Upud7Yfi4XHXqH_fBiaz5T6Gz6MdEG8xfpw7t5iysjtdaCrQ0utwYpfi0xF9OF7LBtbY9xmQ0XHCTnWrGBOt5QXYo5J2x2MQzMugyzLsPsyhgEYiP4Di3-_MM2t7OXKYMh5xeEoo62</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2420622981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Jet aeration as alternative to overcome mass transfer limitation of stirred bioreactors</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Weber, Sebastian ; Schaepe, Sebastian ; Freyer, Stephan ; Kopf, Michael‐Helmut ; Dietzsch, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Weber, Sebastian ; Schaepe, Sebastian ; Freyer, Stephan ; Kopf, Michael‐Helmut ; Dietzsch, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>In industrial biotechnology increasing reactor volumes have the potential to reduce production costs. Whenever the achievable space time yield is determined by the mass transfer performance of the reactor, energy efficiency plays an important role to meet the requirements regarding low investment and operating costs. Based on theoretical calculations, compared to bubble column, airlift reactor, and aerated stirred tank, the jet loop reactor shows the potential for an enhanced energetic efficiency at high mass transfer rates. Interestingly, its technical application in standard biotechnological production processes has not yet been realized. Compared to a stirred tank reactor powered by Rushton turbines, maximum oxygen transfer rates about 200% higher were achieved in a jet loop reactor at identical power input in a fed batch fermentation process. Moreover, a model‐based analysis of yield coefficients and growth kinetics showed that E. coli can be cultivated in jet loop reactors without significant differences in biomass growth. Based on an aerobic fermentation process, the assessment of energetic oxygen transfer efficiency [kgO2 kW−1 h−1] for a jet loop reactor yielded an improvement of almost 100%. The jet loop reactor could be operated at mass transfer rates 67% higher compared to a stirred tank. Thus, an increase of 40% in maximum space time yield [kg m−3 h−1] could be observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-0240</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-2863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/elsc.201700169</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32624903</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons Inc</publisher><subject>Aerobic bioprocess ; Energetic efficiency ; Jet loop reactor ; Mass transfer performance ; Productivity</subject><ispartof>Engineering in life sciences, 2018-04, Vol.18 (4), p.244-253</ispartof><rights>2018 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4491-bd943d82f0f7e048cc5df0c6aed734c50f5dc21aa926dc08d02ed786509eb533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4491-bd943d82f0f7e048cc5df0c6aed734c50f5dc21aa926dc08d02ed786509eb533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999413/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6999413/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,1418,27928,27929,45578,45579,53795,53797</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weber, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaepe, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freyer, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopf, Michael‐Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietzsch, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Jet aeration as alternative to overcome mass transfer limitation of stirred bioreactors</title><title>Engineering in life sciences</title><description>In industrial biotechnology increasing reactor volumes have the potential to reduce production costs. Whenever the achievable space time yield is determined by the mass transfer performance of the reactor, energy efficiency plays an important role to meet the requirements regarding low investment and operating costs. Based on theoretical calculations, compared to bubble column, airlift reactor, and aerated stirred tank, the jet loop reactor shows the potential for an enhanced energetic efficiency at high mass transfer rates. Interestingly, its technical application in standard biotechnological production processes has not yet been realized. Compared to a stirred tank reactor powered by Rushton turbines, maximum oxygen transfer rates about 200% higher were achieved in a jet loop reactor at identical power input in a fed batch fermentation process. Moreover, a model‐based analysis of yield coefficients and growth kinetics showed that E. coli can be cultivated in jet loop reactors without significant differences in biomass growth. Based on an aerobic fermentation process, the assessment of energetic oxygen transfer efficiency [kgO2 kW−1 h−1] for a jet loop reactor yielded an improvement of almost 100%. The jet loop reactor could be operated at mass transfer rates 67% higher compared to a stirred tank. Thus, an increase of 40% in maximum space time yield [kg m−3 h−1] could be observed.</description><subject>Aerobic bioprocess</subject><subject>Energetic efficiency</subject><subject>Jet loop reactor</subject><subject>Mass transfer performance</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><issn>1618-0240</issn><issn>1618-2863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUUtLAzEQDqL4vnrO0UvrJJtNk4sgxScFDxY8hjSZ1cjuRpO04r93S0vBk6eZ4XsNfIRcMBgzAH6FbXZjDmwCwKTeI8dMMjXiSlb72x24gCNykvPHQJkoxQ7JUcUlFxqqY_L6hIVaTLaE2FObqW0Lpn44V0hLpHGFycUOaWdzpiXZPjeYaBu6UDaa2NBcQkro6SLEhNaVmPIZOWhsm_F8O0_J_O52Pn0YzZ7vH6c3s5ETQrPRwmtRecUbaCYIQjlX-wactOgnlXA1NLV3nFmrufQOlAc-IErWoHFRV9Upud7Yfi4XHXqH_fBiaz5T6Gz6MdEG8xfpw7t5iysjtdaCrQ0utwYpfi0xF9OF7LBtbY9xmQ0XHCTnWrGBOt5QXYo5J2x2MQzMugyzLsPsyhgEYiP4Di3-_MM2t7OXKYMh5xeEoo62</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Weber, Sebastian</creator><creator>Schaepe, Sebastian</creator><creator>Freyer, Stephan</creator><creator>Kopf, Michael‐Helmut</creator><creator>Dietzsch, Christian</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Jet aeration as alternative to overcome mass transfer limitation of stirred bioreactors</title><author>Weber, Sebastian ; Schaepe, Sebastian ; Freyer, Stephan ; Kopf, Michael‐Helmut ; Dietzsch, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4491-bd943d82f0f7e048cc5df0c6aed734c50f5dc21aa926dc08d02ed786509eb533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aerobic bioprocess</topic><topic>Energetic efficiency</topic><topic>Jet loop reactor</topic><topic>Mass transfer performance</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weber, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaepe, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freyer, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopf, Michael‐Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietzsch, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Engineering in life sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weber, Sebastian</au><au>Schaepe, Sebastian</au><au>Freyer, Stephan</au><au>Kopf, Michael‐Helmut</au><au>Dietzsch, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Jet aeration as alternative to overcome mass transfer limitation of stirred bioreactors</atitle><jtitle>Engineering in life sciences</jtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>244</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>244-253</pages><issn>1618-0240</issn><eissn>1618-2863</eissn><abstract>In industrial biotechnology increasing reactor volumes have the potential to reduce production costs. Whenever the achievable space time yield is determined by the mass transfer performance of the reactor, energy efficiency plays an important role to meet the requirements regarding low investment and operating costs. Based on theoretical calculations, compared to bubble column, airlift reactor, and aerated stirred tank, the jet loop reactor shows the potential for an enhanced energetic efficiency at high mass transfer rates. Interestingly, its technical application in standard biotechnological production processes has not yet been realized. Compared to a stirred tank reactor powered by Rushton turbines, maximum oxygen transfer rates about 200% higher were achieved in a jet loop reactor at identical power input in a fed batch fermentation process. Moreover, a model‐based analysis of yield coefficients and growth kinetics showed that E. coli can be cultivated in jet loop reactors without significant differences in biomass growth. Based on an aerobic fermentation process, the assessment of energetic oxygen transfer efficiency [kgO2 kW−1 h−1] for a jet loop reactor yielded an improvement of almost 100%. The jet loop reactor could be operated at mass transfer rates 67% higher compared to a stirred tank. Thus, an increase of 40% in maximum space time yield [kg m−3 h−1] could be observed.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons Inc</pub><pmid>32624903</pmid><doi>10.1002/elsc.201700169</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1618-0240
ispartof Engineering in life sciences, 2018-04, Vol.18 (4), p.244-253
issn 1618-0240
1618-2863
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6999413
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; PubMed Central
subjects Aerobic bioprocess
Energetic efficiency
Jet loop reactor
Mass transfer performance
Productivity
title Jet aeration as alternative to overcome mass transfer limitation of stirred bioreactors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T05%3A52%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Jet%20aeration%20as%20alternative%20to%20overcome%20mass%20transfer%20limitation%20of%20stirred%20bioreactors&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20in%20life%20sciences&rft.au=Weber,%20Sebastian&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=244&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=244-253&rft.issn=1618-0240&rft.eissn=1618-2863&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/elsc.201700169&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2420622981%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2420622981&rft_id=info:pmid/32624903&rfr_iscdi=true