An evaluation of communication barriers and facilitators at the time of a mental health diagnosis: a survey of health professional practices

To examine health professionals' views and practices relating to the specific barriers to communication that arise at the time of mental health diagnosis, and the strategies used to support individuals throughout this process. An online survey of the beliefs and practices of 131 mental health c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences 2018-08, Vol.27 (4), p.357-368
Hauptverfasser: Milton, A. C., Mullan, B., MacCann, C., Hunt, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 368
container_issue 4
container_start_page 357
container_title Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences
container_volume 27
creator Milton, A. C.
Mullan, B.
MacCann, C.
Hunt, C.
description To examine health professionals' views and practices relating to the specific barriers to communication that arise at the time of mental health diagnosis, and the strategies used to support individuals throughout this process. An online survey of the beliefs and practices of 131 mental health clinicians working in different clinical settings across Australia was conducted. Exploratory factor analysis of the items relating to barriers to communication resulted in three latent factors ('stigma, diagnosis and risk'; 'service structure'; and 'individual circumstances' such as the person receiving the diagnosis being young, having a culturally and linguistically diverse background or being unwell at the time of conversation). Using linear regression it was found that variance in 'stigma, diagnosis and risk' was significantly explained by whether participating clinicians had medical training, their experience working with serious mental health problems, their confidence handling distress and attitude towards diagnosis. Variance in 'individual circumstances' was significantly explained by participating clinicians' confidence handling distress. The most frequently used strategies to support diagnostic discussions centred on the health professionals' communication skills, gauging the individual's perception of their circumstances, responding with empathy, following-up after discussion, addressing stigma concerns, using collaborative practice and setting up for the conversation. Three main areas for health professionals to reflect on, plan for and ultimately address when discussing news with the individual concerned emerged ('stigma, diagnosis and risk'; 'service structure'; and 'individual circumstances'). Variations in practice indicate that practitioners should be cognisant of their own beliefs and background and how this impacts their communication practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S2045796016001153
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6998863</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S2045796016001153</cupid><sourcerecordid>1861602618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-244c24dec3135e53caaf95a51ec6fe40653b5cdfba99e9179ae1654fa0a5482b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1r3DAQNaWlCWl-QC9F0Esv20rWh60eCiEkbSGQQ9KzGMujXQXb2kryQv5Df3Rldrv9ItJB4s17b2Z4VfWa0feMsubDXU2FbLSiTFHKmOTPqtMFWjW60c-Pf0VPqvOUHmg5QtOWq5fVSd0WAeXstPpxMRHcwTBD9mEiwREbxnGevN0DHcToMSYCU08cWD_4DDksQCZ5gyT7ERcZkBGnDAPZIAx5Q3oP6ykknz6WUprjDh8X2qG6jcFhSqVDUWwj2OwtplfVCwdDwvPDe1Z9u766v_yyurn9_PXy4mZlRcPyqhbC1qJHyxmXKLkFcFqCZGiVQ0GV5J20vetAa9Ss0YBMSeGAghRt3fGz6tPedzt3I_a2DB5hMNvoR4iPJoA3f1cmvzHrsDNK67ZVvBi8OxjE8H3GlM3ok8VhgAnDnAxrVUmlVqwt1Lf_UB_CHMvaydRU8XJl3RQW27NsDClFdMdhGDVL3Oa_uIvmzZ9bHBW_wi0EfjCFsYu-X-Pv3k_b_gReO7eD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2063636527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of communication barriers and facilitators at the time of a mental health diagnosis: a survey of health professional practices</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Milton, A. C. ; Mullan, B. ; MacCann, C. ; Hunt, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Milton, A. C. ; Mullan, B. ; MacCann, C. ; Hunt, C.</creatorcontrib><description>To examine health professionals' views and practices relating to the specific barriers to communication that arise at the time of mental health diagnosis, and the strategies used to support individuals throughout this process. An online survey of the beliefs and practices of 131 mental health clinicians working in different clinical settings across Australia was conducted. Exploratory factor analysis of the items relating to barriers to communication resulted in three latent factors ('stigma, diagnosis and risk'; 'service structure'; and 'individual circumstances' such as the person receiving the diagnosis being young, having a culturally and linguistically diverse background or being unwell at the time of conversation). Using linear regression it was found that variance in 'stigma, diagnosis and risk' was significantly explained by whether participating clinicians had medical training, their experience working with serious mental health problems, their confidence handling distress and attitude towards diagnosis. Variance in 'individual circumstances' was significantly explained by participating clinicians' confidence handling distress. The most frequently used strategies to support diagnostic discussions centred on the health professionals' communication skills, gauging the individual's perception of their circumstances, responding with empathy, following-up after discussion, addressing stigma concerns, using collaborative practice and setting up for the conversation. Three main areas for health professionals to reflect on, plan for and ultimately address when discussing news with the individual concerned emerged ('stigma, diagnosis and risk'; 'service structure'; and 'individual circumstances'). Variations in practice indicate that practitioners should be cognisant of their own beliefs and background and how this impacts their communication practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7979</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S2045796016001153</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28115031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Australia ; Communication ; Communication Barriers ; Confidence ; Diagnosis ; Empathy ; Ethics ; Factor analysis ; Female ; Health Personnel - psychology ; Health problems ; Health services ; Humans ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical personnel ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - diagnosis ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Mental Health ; Mental Health Services ; Original ; Original Articles ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Professionals ; Psychiatrists ; Psychiatry ; Schizophrenia ; Social Stigma ; Stigma ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Verbal communication ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2018-08, Vol.27 (4), p.357-368</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2017 2017 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-244c24dec3135e53caaf95a51ec6fe40653b5cdfba99e9179ae1654fa0a5482b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-244c24dec3135e53caaf95a51ec6fe40653b5cdfba99e9179ae1654fa0a5482b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6998863/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2045796016001153/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28115031$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Milton, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullan, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacCann, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, C.</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of communication barriers and facilitators at the time of a mental health diagnosis: a survey of health professional practices</title><title>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences</title><addtitle>Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci</addtitle><description>To examine health professionals' views and practices relating to the specific barriers to communication that arise at the time of mental health diagnosis, and the strategies used to support individuals throughout this process. An online survey of the beliefs and practices of 131 mental health clinicians working in different clinical settings across Australia was conducted. Exploratory factor analysis of the items relating to barriers to communication resulted in three latent factors ('stigma, diagnosis and risk'; 'service structure'; and 'individual circumstances' such as the person receiving the diagnosis being young, having a culturally and linguistically diverse background or being unwell at the time of conversation). Using linear regression it was found that variance in 'stigma, diagnosis and risk' was significantly explained by whether participating clinicians had medical training, their experience working with serious mental health problems, their confidence handling distress and attitude towards diagnosis. Variance in 'individual circumstances' was significantly explained by participating clinicians' confidence handling distress. The most frequently used strategies to support diagnostic discussions centred on the health professionals' communication skills, gauging the individual's perception of their circumstances, responding with empathy, following-up after discussion, addressing stigma concerns, using collaborative practice and setting up for the conversation. Three main areas for health professionals to reflect on, plan for and ultimately address when discussing news with the individual concerned emerged ('stigma, diagnosis and risk'; 'service structure'; and 'individual circumstances'). Variations in practice indicate that practitioners should be cognisant of their own beliefs and background and how this impacts their communication practice.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication Barriers</subject><subject>Confidence</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Mental Health Services</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Psychiatrists</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Social Stigma</subject><subject>Stigma</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Verbal communication</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>2045-7960</issn><issn>2045-7979</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1r3DAQNaWlCWl-QC9F0Esv20rWh60eCiEkbSGQQ9KzGMujXQXb2kryQv5Df3Rldrv9ItJB4s17b2Z4VfWa0feMsubDXU2FbLSiTFHKmOTPqtMFWjW60c-Pf0VPqvOUHmg5QtOWq5fVSd0WAeXstPpxMRHcwTBD9mEiwREbxnGevN0DHcToMSYCU08cWD_4DDksQCZ5gyT7ERcZkBGnDAPZIAx5Q3oP6ykknz6WUprjDh8X2qG6jcFhSqVDUWwj2OwtplfVCwdDwvPDe1Z9u766v_yyurn9_PXy4mZlRcPyqhbC1qJHyxmXKLkFcFqCZGiVQ0GV5J20vetAa9Ss0YBMSeGAghRt3fGz6tPedzt3I_a2DB5hMNvoR4iPJoA3f1cmvzHrsDNK67ZVvBi8OxjE8H3GlM3ok8VhgAnDnAxrVUmlVqwt1Lf_UB_CHMvaydRU8XJl3RQW27NsDClFdMdhGDVL3Oa_uIvmzZ9bHBW_wi0EfjCFsYu-X-Pv3k_b_gReO7eD</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Milton, A. C.</creator><creator>Mullan, B.</creator><creator>MacCann, C.</creator><creator>Hunt, C.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>An evaluation of communication barriers and facilitators at the time of a mental health diagnosis: a survey of health professional practices</title><author>Milton, A. C. ; Mullan, B. ; MacCann, C. ; Hunt, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-244c24dec3135e53caaf95a51ec6fe40653b5cdfba99e9179ae1654fa0a5482b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication Barriers</topic><topic>Confidence</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Mental Health Services</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Psychiatrists</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Social Stigma</topic><topic>Stigma</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Verbal communication</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Milton, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullan, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacCann, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Milton, A. C.</au><au>Mullan, B.</au><au>MacCann, C.</au><au>Hunt, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of communication barriers and facilitators at the time of a mental health diagnosis: a survey of health professional practices</atitle><jtitle>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci</addtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>357</spage><epage>368</epage><pages>357-368</pages><issn>2045-7960</issn><eissn>2045-7979</eissn><abstract>To examine health professionals' views and practices relating to the specific barriers to communication that arise at the time of mental health diagnosis, and the strategies used to support individuals throughout this process. An online survey of the beliefs and practices of 131 mental health clinicians working in different clinical settings across Australia was conducted. Exploratory factor analysis of the items relating to barriers to communication resulted in three latent factors ('stigma, diagnosis and risk'; 'service structure'; and 'individual circumstances' such as the person receiving the diagnosis being young, having a culturally and linguistically diverse background or being unwell at the time of conversation). Using linear regression it was found that variance in 'stigma, diagnosis and risk' was significantly explained by whether participating clinicians had medical training, their experience working with serious mental health problems, their confidence handling distress and attitude towards diagnosis. Variance in 'individual circumstances' was significantly explained by participating clinicians' confidence handling distress. The most frequently used strategies to support diagnostic discussions centred on the health professionals' communication skills, gauging the individual's perception of their circumstances, responding with empathy, following-up after discussion, addressing stigma concerns, using collaborative practice and setting up for the conversation. Three main areas for health professionals to reflect on, plan for and ultimately address when discussing news with the individual concerned emerged ('stigma, diagnosis and risk'; 'service structure'; and 'individual circumstances'). Variations in practice indicate that practitioners should be cognisant of their own beliefs and background and how this impacts their communication practice.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>28115031</pmid><doi>10.1017/S2045796016001153</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-7960
ispartof Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2018-08, Vol.27 (4), p.357-368
issn 2045-7960
2045-7979
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6998863
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Attitude of Health Personnel
Australia
Communication
Communication Barriers
Confidence
Diagnosis
Empathy
Ethics
Factor analysis
Female
Health Personnel - psychology
Health problems
Health services
Humans
Male
Medical diagnosis
Medical personnel
Mental disorders
Mental Disorders - diagnosis
Mental Disorders - psychology
Mental Health
Mental Health Services
Original
Original Articles
Physician-Patient Relations
Professionals
Psychiatrists
Psychiatry
Schizophrenia
Social Stigma
Stigma
Surveys and Questionnaires
Verbal communication
Workforce
title An evaluation of communication barriers and facilitators at the time of a mental health diagnosis: a survey of health professional practices
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A22%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20communication%20barriers%20and%20facilitators%20at%20the%20time%20of%20a%20mental%20health%20diagnosis:%20a%20survey%20of%20health%20professional%20practices&rft.jtitle=Epidemiology%20and%20psychiatric%20sciences&rft.au=Milton,%20A.%20C.&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=357&rft.epage=368&rft.pages=357-368&rft.issn=2045-7960&rft.eissn=2045-7979&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S2045796016001153&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1861602618%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2063636527&rft_id=info:pmid/28115031&rft_cupid=10_1017_S2045796016001153&rfr_iscdi=true