Social networks, support and early psychosis: a systematic review
Background. There is strong evidence that those with a long-standing psychotic disorder have fewer social contacts and less social support than comparison groups. There is less research on the extent of social contacts and support prior to or at the onset of psychosis. In the light of recent evidenc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences 2013-06, Vol.22 (2), p.131-146 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 146 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 131 |
container_title | Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Gayer-Anderson, C. Morgan, C. |
description | Background. There is strong evidence that those with a long-standing psychotic disorder have fewer social contacts and less social support than comparison groups. There is less research on the extent of social contacts and support prior to or at the onset of psychosis. In the light of recent evidence implicating a range of social experiences and contexts at the onset of psychosis, it is relevant to establish whether social networks and support diminished before or at the time of onset and whether the absence of such supports might contribute to risk, either directly or indirectly. We, therefore, conducted a systematic review of this literature to establish what is currently known about the relationship between social networks, support and early psychosis. Methods. We identified all studies investigating social networks and support in first episode psychosis samples and in general population samples with measures of psychotic experiences or schizotype by conducting systematic searches of electronic databases using pre-defined search terms and criteria. Findings were synthesized using non-quantitative approaches. Results. Thirty-eight papers were identified that met inclusion criteria. There was marked methodological heterogeneity, which limits the capacity to draw direct comparisons. Nonetheless, the existing literature suggests social networks (particularly close friends) and support diminished both among first episode samples and among non-clinical samples reporting psychotic experiences or with schizotype traits, compared with varying comparison groups. These differences may be more marked for men and for those from minority ethnic populations. Conclusions. Tentatively, reduced social networks and support appear to pre-date onset of psychotic disorder. However, the substantial methodological heterogeneity among the existing studies makes comparisons difficult and suggests a need for more robust and comparable studies on networks, support and early psychosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S2045796012000406 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6998121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S2045796012000406</cupid><sourcerecordid>3050346261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-573e1d869fed779ff68e99936749cbdcc37dd73edf97d52a785537448df7f2c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoOow-gBspuHFhNWlujQthEG8guBhdh0ySOhnbpiat0re3g-MwKq5yyPnOlxx-AA4RPEMQ8fNpBgnlgkGUQQgJZFtgtLxKueBie10zuAcOYlzAJSRgjtku2MuyHKOc4BGYTL12qkxq23748BpPk9g1jQ9tomqTWBXKPmlir-c-uniRqCT2sbWVap1Ogn139mMf7BSqjPZgdY7B883109Vd-vB4e381eUg1RaJNKccWmZyJwhrORVGw3AohMONE6JnRGnNjBsYUghuaKZ5TijkhuSl4kWmOx-Dyy9t0s8oabes2qFI2wVUq9NIrJ392ajeXL_5dMiFylKFBcLISBP_W2djKykVty1LV1ndRIkwhoowQOqDHv9CF70I9rCcRyRiliAk2UOiL0sHHGGyx_gyCcpmR_JPRMHO0ucV64juRAcArqapmwZkXu_H2v9pPP5KbbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1426551696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social networks, support and early psychosis: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gayer-Anderson, C. ; Morgan, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gayer-Anderson, C. ; Morgan, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Background. There is strong evidence that those with a long-standing psychotic disorder have fewer social contacts and less social support than comparison groups. There is less research on the extent of social contacts and support prior to or at the onset of psychosis. In the light of recent evidence implicating a range of social experiences and contexts at the onset of psychosis, it is relevant to establish whether social networks and support diminished before or at the time of onset and whether the absence of such supports might contribute to risk, either directly or indirectly. We, therefore, conducted a systematic review of this literature to establish what is currently known about the relationship between social networks, support and early psychosis. Methods. We identified all studies investigating social networks and support in first episode psychosis samples and in general population samples with measures of psychotic experiences or schizotype by conducting systematic searches of electronic databases using pre-defined search terms and criteria. Findings were synthesized using non-quantitative approaches. Results. Thirty-eight papers were identified that met inclusion criteria. There was marked methodological heterogeneity, which limits the capacity to draw direct comparisons. Nonetheless, the existing literature suggests social networks (particularly close friends) and support diminished both among first episode samples and among non-clinical samples reporting psychotic experiences or with schizotype traits, compared with varying comparison groups. These differences may be more marked for men and for those from minority ethnic populations. Conclusions. Tentatively, reduced social networks and support appear to pre-date onset of psychotic disorder. However, the substantial methodological heterogeneity among the existing studies makes comparisons difficult and suggests a need for more robust and comparable studies on networks, support and early psychosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7979</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S2045796012000406</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22831843</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Ethnic Groups ; Humans ; Mental disorders ; Psychosis ; Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology ; Social Behavior ; Social Networking ; Social networks ; Social Support ; Special ; Special Article ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2013-06, Vol.22 (2), p.131-146</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2012 2012 Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-573e1d869fed779ff68e99936749cbdcc37dd73edf97d52a785537448df7f2c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-573e1d869fed779ff68e99936749cbdcc37dd73edf97d52a785537448df7f2c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6998121/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2045796012000406/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22831843$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gayer-Anderson, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Social networks, support and early psychosis: a systematic review</title><title>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences</title><addtitle>Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci</addtitle><description>Background. There is strong evidence that those with a long-standing psychotic disorder have fewer social contacts and less social support than comparison groups. There is less research on the extent of social contacts and support prior to or at the onset of psychosis. In the light of recent evidence implicating a range of social experiences and contexts at the onset of psychosis, it is relevant to establish whether social networks and support diminished before or at the time of onset and whether the absence of such supports might contribute to risk, either directly or indirectly. We, therefore, conducted a systematic review of this literature to establish what is currently known about the relationship between social networks, support and early psychosis. Methods. We identified all studies investigating social networks and support in first episode psychosis samples and in general population samples with measures of psychotic experiences or schizotype by conducting systematic searches of electronic databases using pre-defined search terms and criteria. Findings were synthesized using non-quantitative approaches. Results. Thirty-eight papers were identified that met inclusion criteria. There was marked methodological heterogeneity, which limits the capacity to draw direct comparisons. Nonetheless, the existing literature suggests social networks (particularly close friends) and support diminished both among first episode samples and among non-clinical samples reporting psychotic experiences or with schizotype traits, compared with varying comparison groups. These differences may be more marked for men and for those from minority ethnic populations. Conclusions. Tentatively, reduced social networks and support appear to pre-date onset of psychotic disorder. However, the substantial methodological heterogeneity among the existing studies makes comparisons difficult and suggests a need for more robust and comparable studies on networks, support and early psychosis.</description><subject>Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Social Networking</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Special</subject><subject>Special Article</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>2045-7960</issn><issn>2045-7979</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoOow-gBspuHFhNWlujQthEG8guBhdh0ySOhnbpiat0re3g-MwKq5yyPnOlxx-AA4RPEMQ8fNpBgnlgkGUQQgJZFtgtLxKueBie10zuAcOYlzAJSRgjtku2MuyHKOc4BGYTL12qkxq23748BpPk9g1jQ9tomqTWBXKPmlir-c-uniRqCT2sbWVap1Ogn139mMf7BSqjPZgdY7B883109Vd-vB4e381eUg1RaJNKccWmZyJwhrORVGw3AohMONE6JnRGnNjBsYUghuaKZ5TijkhuSl4kWmOx-Dyy9t0s8oabes2qFI2wVUq9NIrJ392ajeXL_5dMiFylKFBcLISBP_W2djKykVty1LV1ndRIkwhoowQOqDHv9CF70I9rCcRyRiliAk2UOiL0sHHGGyx_gyCcpmR_JPRMHO0ucV64juRAcArqapmwZkXu_H2v9pPP5KbbA</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Gayer-Anderson, C.</creator><creator>Morgan, C.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Social networks, support and early psychosis: a systematic review</title><author>Gayer-Anderson, C. ; Morgan, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-573e1d869fed779ff68e99936749cbdcc37dd73edf97d52a785537448df7f2c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Social Networking</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Special</topic><topic>Special Article</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gayer-Anderson, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gayer-Anderson, C.</au><au>Morgan, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social networks, support and early psychosis: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>131-146</pages><issn>2045-7960</issn><eissn>2045-7979</eissn><abstract>Background. There is strong evidence that those with a long-standing psychotic disorder have fewer social contacts and less social support than comparison groups. There is less research on the extent of social contacts and support prior to or at the onset of psychosis. In the light of recent evidence implicating a range of social experiences and contexts at the onset of psychosis, it is relevant to establish whether social networks and support diminished before or at the time of onset and whether the absence of such supports might contribute to risk, either directly or indirectly. We, therefore, conducted a systematic review of this literature to establish what is currently known about the relationship between social networks, support and early psychosis. Methods. We identified all studies investigating social networks and support in first episode psychosis samples and in general population samples with measures of psychotic experiences or schizotype by conducting systematic searches of electronic databases using pre-defined search terms and criteria. Findings were synthesized using non-quantitative approaches. Results. Thirty-eight papers were identified that met inclusion criteria. There was marked methodological heterogeneity, which limits the capacity to draw direct comparisons. Nonetheless, the existing literature suggests social networks (particularly close friends) and support diminished both among first episode samples and among non-clinical samples reporting psychotic experiences or with schizotype traits, compared with varying comparison groups. These differences may be more marked for men and for those from minority ethnic populations. Conclusions. Tentatively, reduced social networks and support appear to pre-date onset of psychotic disorder. However, the substantial methodological heterogeneity among the existing studies makes comparisons difficult and suggests a need for more robust and comparable studies on networks, support and early psychosis.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>22831843</pmid><doi>10.1017/S2045796012000406</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-7960 |
ispartof | Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2013-06, Vol.22 (2), p.131-146 |
issn | 2045-7960 2045-7979 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6998121 |
source | MEDLINE; Cambridge Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Ethnic Groups Humans Mental disorders Psychosis Psychotic Disorders - epidemiology Social Behavior Social Networking Social networks Social Support Special Special Article Systematic review |
title | Social networks, support and early psychosis: a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T03%3A08%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20networks,%20support%20and%20early%20psychosis:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Epidemiology%20and%20psychiatric%20sciences&rft.au=Gayer-Anderson,%20C.&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=131-146&rft.issn=2045-7960&rft.eissn=2045-7979&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S2045796012000406&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3050346261%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1426551696&rft_id=info:pmid/22831843&rft_cupid=10_1017_S2045796012000406&rfr_iscdi=true |