Ovarian tissue vitrification is more efficient than slow freezing to preserve ovarian stem cells in CF-1 mice

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of protocols for mice ovary cryopreservation to compare the differences in Mouse Vasa Homologue expression (a germline cell marker) and ovarian viability after vitrification or slow freezing. Female CF1 mice aged 40-45 days were randomly divided...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JBRA assisted reproduction 2020-01, Vol.24 (1), p.13-19
Hauptverfasser: Terraciano, Paula Barros, Garcez, Tuane Alves, Berger, Markus, Durli, Isabel, Kuhl, Cristiana Palma, Batista, Vitória de Oliveira, Schneider, Raquel de Almeida, Festa, Jaquelline, Pilar, Emily, Ferreira, Charles, Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi, Lima, Elizabeth Cirne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 19
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13
container_title JBRA assisted reproduction
container_volume 24
creator Terraciano, Paula Barros
Garcez, Tuane Alves
Berger, Markus
Durli, Isabel
Kuhl, Cristiana Palma
Batista, Vitória de Oliveira
Schneider, Raquel de Almeida
Festa, Jaquelline
Pilar, Emily
Ferreira, Charles
Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi
Lima, Elizabeth Cirne
description The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of protocols for mice ovary cryopreservation to compare the differences in Mouse Vasa Homologue expression (a germline cell marker) and ovarian viability after vitrification or slow freezing. Female CF1 mice aged 40-45 days were randomly divided into three groups: Control, vitrification or slow freezing. Their ovaries were surgically removed, rinsed in saline solution and cryopreserved. For vitrification, we used a commercial protocol and for slow freeze, we used 1.5 M ethylene glycol (EG) as cryoprotectant. After that, the ovaries were processed for histological an immunohistochemical analysis, and counting of primordial, primary, pre-antral and antral follicles. No significant difference was found in the proportion of high-quality primordial, primary and pre-antral follicles after thawing/warming in the slow freezing and vitrification groups. The immunohistochemistry for MVH antibody demonstrated that the slow freeze group had a higher number of unmarked cells (p=0.012), indicating a harmful effect on the MVH expression in the ovarian tissue, where the cell structure is complex. Although both protocols indicated similar results in the histological analysis of follicular counts, the vitrification protocol was significantly better to preserve ovarian stem cells, an immature germ cell population. These cells are able to self-renew having regeneration potential, and may be effective for the treatment of ovarian failure and consequently infertility.
doi_str_mv 10.5935/1518-0557.20190057
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6993165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2312553240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-412fc4057b38a18c091d96ade2e8bdf609c25f0057a2e2ae28d3538774d427df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVpacI2f6CHIuilF2_0acuXQlnyBYFc2rPQyqNdBdvaSvKG5NdHJpslyWmG0TMv8-pF6DslS9lyeU4lVRWRslkyQltCZPMJnR6Hn9_0J-gspXtCCkYZF-QrOuG0Vi0R_BQNd3sTvRlx9ilNgPc-R--8NdmHEfuEhxABgysjD2PGeVvY1IcH7CLAkx83OAe8i5Ag7gGHg1rKMGALfZ-wH_HqsqJ48Ba-oS_O9AnODnWB_l1e_F1dV7d3VzerP7eVFZzkSlDmrCiW1lwZqixpadfWpgMGat25mrSWSTd7NgyYAaY6LrlqGtEJ1nSOL9DvF93dtB6gs-XyaHq9i34w8VEH4_X7l9Fv9Sbsdd225W9kEfh1EIjh_wQp68Gn2Y8ZIUxJM06ZlJwJUtCfH9D7MMWx2CtUrWSjOBWFYi-UjSGlCO54DCV6DlTPeek5L_0aaFn68dbGceU1Pv4M7jab7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2368578314</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ovarian tissue vitrification is more efficient than slow freezing to preserve ovarian stem cells in CF-1 mice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Terraciano, Paula Barros ; Garcez, Tuane Alves ; Berger, Markus ; Durli, Isabel ; Kuhl, Cristiana Palma ; Batista, Vitória de Oliveira ; Schneider, Raquel de Almeida ; Festa, Jaquelline ; Pilar, Emily ; Ferreira, Charles ; Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi ; Lima, Elizabeth Cirne</creator><creatorcontrib>Terraciano, Paula Barros ; Garcez, Tuane Alves ; Berger, Markus ; Durli, Isabel ; Kuhl, Cristiana Palma ; Batista, Vitória de Oliveira ; Schneider, Raquel de Almeida ; Festa, Jaquelline ; Pilar, Emily ; Ferreira, Charles ; Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi ; Lima, Elizabeth Cirne</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of protocols for mice ovary cryopreservation to compare the differences in Mouse Vasa Homologue expression (a germline cell marker) and ovarian viability after vitrification or slow freezing. Female CF1 mice aged 40-45 days were randomly divided into three groups: Control, vitrification or slow freezing. Their ovaries were surgically removed, rinsed in saline solution and cryopreserved. For vitrification, we used a commercial protocol and for slow freeze, we used 1.5 M ethylene glycol (EG) as cryoprotectant. After that, the ovaries were processed for histological an immunohistochemical analysis, and counting of primordial, primary, pre-antral and antral follicles. No significant difference was found in the proportion of high-quality primordial, primary and pre-antral follicles after thawing/warming in the slow freezing and vitrification groups. The immunohistochemistry for MVH antibody demonstrated that the slow freeze group had a higher number of unmarked cells (p=0.012), indicating a harmful effect on the MVH expression in the ovarian tissue, where the cell structure is complex. Although both protocols indicated similar results in the histological analysis of follicular counts, the vitrification protocol was significantly better to preserve ovarian stem cells, an immature germ cell population. These cells are able to self-renew having regeneration potential, and may be effective for the treatment of ovarian failure and consequently infertility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1518-0557</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1517-5693</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1518-0557</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190057</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31689043</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Humana (Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction)</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cryopreservation ; Cryopreservation - methods ; Drug overdose ; Female ; Fertility ; Fertility Preservation - methods ; Mice ; Nitrogen ; Original ; Ovary - cytology ; Ovary - physiology ; Stem Cells - cytology ; Stem Cells - physiology ; Sucrose ; Vitrification</subject><ispartof>JBRA assisted reproduction, 2020-01, Vol.24 (1), p.13-19</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-412fc4057b38a18c091d96ade2e8bdf609c25f0057a2e2ae28d3538774d427df3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993165/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993165/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689043$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Terraciano, Paula Barros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcez, Tuane Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durli, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhl, Cristiana Palma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batista, Vitória de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Raquel de Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Festa, Jaquelline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilar, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Elizabeth Cirne</creatorcontrib><title>Ovarian tissue vitrification is more efficient than slow freezing to preserve ovarian stem cells in CF-1 mice</title><title>JBRA assisted reproduction</title><addtitle>JBRA Assist Reprod</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of protocols for mice ovary cryopreservation to compare the differences in Mouse Vasa Homologue expression (a germline cell marker) and ovarian viability after vitrification or slow freezing. Female CF1 mice aged 40-45 days were randomly divided into three groups: Control, vitrification or slow freezing. Their ovaries were surgically removed, rinsed in saline solution and cryopreserved. For vitrification, we used a commercial protocol and for slow freeze, we used 1.5 M ethylene glycol (EG) as cryoprotectant. After that, the ovaries were processed for histological an immunohistochemical analysis, and counting of primordial, primary, pre-antral and antral follicles. No significant difference was found in the proportion of high-quality primordial, primary and pre-antral follicles after thawing/warming in the slow freezing and vitrification groups. The immunohistochemistry for MVH antibody demonstrated that the slow freeze group had a higher number of unmarked cells (p=0.012), indicating a harmful effect on the MVH expression in the ovarian tissue, where the cell structure is complex. Although both protocols indicated similar results in the histological analysis of follicular counts, the vitrification protocol was significantly better to preserve ovarian stem cells, an immature germ cell population. These cells are able to self-renew having regeneration potential, and may be effective for the treatment of ovarian failure and consequently infertility.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Cryopreservation - methods</subject><subject>Drug overdose</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fertility Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Ovary - cytology</subject><subject>Ovary - physiology</subject><subject>Stem Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Stem Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Sucrose</subject><subject>Vitrification</subject><issn>1518-0557</issn><issn>1517-5693</issn><issn>1518-0557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVpacI2f6CHIuilF2_0acuXQlnyBYFc2rPQyqNdBdvaSvKG5NdHJpslyWmG0TMv8-pF6DslS9lyeU4lVRWRslkyQltCZPMJnR6Hn9_0J-gspXtCCkYZF-QrOuG0Vi0R_BQNd3sTvRlx9ilNgPc-R--8NdmHEfuEhxABgysjD2PGeVvY1IcH7CLAkx83OAe8i5Ag7gGHg1rKMGALfZ-wH_HqsqJ48Ba-oS_O9AnODnWB_l1e_F1dV7d3VzerP7eVFZzkSlDmrCiW1lwZqixpadfWpgMGat25mrSWSTd7NgyYAaY6LrlqGtEJ1nSOL9DvF93dtB6gs-XyaHq9i34w8VEH4_X7l9Fv9Sbsdd225W9kEfh1EIjh_wQp68Gn2Y8ZIUxJM06ZlJwJUtCfH9D7MMWx2CtUrWSjOBWFYi-UjSGlCO54DCV6DlTPeek5L_0aaFn68dbGceU1Pv4M7jab7g</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Terraciano, Paula Barros</creator><creator>Garcez, Tuane Alves</creator><creator>Berger, Markus</creator><creator>Durli, Isabel</creator><creator>Kuhl, Cristiana Palma</creator><creator>Batista, Vitória de Oliveira</creator><creator>Schneider, Raquel de Almeida</creator><creator>Festa, Jaquelline</creator><creator>Pilar, Emily</creator><creator>Ferreira, Charles</creator><creator>Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi</creator><creator>Lima, Elizabeth Cirne</creator><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Humana (Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction)</general><general>Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Ovarian tissue vitrification is more efficient than slow freezing to preserve ovarian stem cells in CF-1 mice</title><author>Terraciano, Paula Barros ; Garcez, Tuane Alves ; Berger, Markus ; Durli, Isabel ; Kuhl, Cristiana Palma ; Batista, Vitória de Oliveira ; Schneider, Raquel de Almeida ; Festa, Jaquelline ; Pilar, Emily ; Ferreira, Charles ; Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi ; Lima, Elizabeth Cirne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-412fc4057b38a18c091d96ade2e8bdf609c25f0057a2e2ae28d3538774d427df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Cryopreservation - methods</topic><topic>Drug overdose</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fertility Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Ovary - cytology</topic><topic>Ovary - physiology</topic><topic>Stem Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Stem Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Sucrose</topic><topic>Vitrification</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Terraciano, Paula Barros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcez, Tuane Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durli, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhl, Cristiana Palma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batista, Vitória de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Raquel de Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Festa, Jaquelline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilar, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Elizabeth Cirne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JBRA assisted reproduction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Terraciano, Paula Barros</au><au>Garcez, Tuane Alves</au><au>Berger, Markus</au><au>Durli, Isabel</au><au>Kuhl, Cristiana Palma</au><au>Batista, Vitória de Oliveira</au><au>Schneider, Raquel de Almeida</au><au>Festa, Jaquelline</au><au>Pilar, Emily</au><au>Ferreira, Charles</au><au>Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi</au><au>Lima, Elizabeth Cirne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ovarian tissue vitrification is more efficient than slow freezing to preserve ovarian stem cells in CF-1 mice</atitle><jtitle>JBRA assisted reproduction</jtitle><addtitle>JBRA Assist Reprod</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>13-19</pages><issn>1518-0557</issn><issn>1517-5693</issn><eissn>1518-0557</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of protocols for mice ovary cryopreservation to compare the differences in Mouse Vasa Homologue expression (a germline cell marker) and ovarian viability after vitrification or slow freezing. Female CF1 mice aged 40-45 days were randomly divided into three groups: Control, vitrification or slow freezing. Their ovaries were surgically removed, rinsed in saline solution and cryopreserved. For vitrification, we used a commercial protocol and for slow freeze, we used 1.5 M ethylene glycol (EG) as cryoprotectant. After that, the ovaries were processed for histological an immunohistochemical analysis, and counting of primordial, primary, pre-antral and antral follicles. No significant difference was found in the proportion of high-quality primordial, primary and pre-antral follicles after thawing/warming in the slow freezing and vitrification groups. The immunohistochemistry for MVH antibody demonstrated that the slow freeze group had a higher number of unmarked cells (p=0.012), indicating a harmful effect on the MVH expression in the ovarian tissue, where the cell structure is complex. Although both protocols indicated similar results in the histological analysis of follicular counts, the vitrification protocol was significantly better to preserve ovarian stem cells, an immature germ cell population. These cells are able to self-renew having regeneration potential, and may be effective for the treatment of ovarian failure and consequently infertility.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Humana (Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction)</pub><pmid>31689043</pmid><doi>10.5935/1518-0557.20190057</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1518-0557
ispartof JBRA assisted reproduction, 2020-01, Vol.24 (1), p.13-19
issn 1518-0557
1517-5693
1518-0557
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6993165
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Animals
Cryopreservation
Cryopreservation - methods
Drug overdose
Female
Fertility
Fertility Preservation - methods
Mice
Nitrogen
Original
Ovary - cytology
Ovary - physiology
Stem Cells - cytology
Stem Cells - physiology
Sucrose
Vitrification
title Ovarian tissue vitrification is more efficient than slow freezing to preserve ovarian stem cells in CF-1 mice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A23%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ovarian%20tissue%20vitrification%20is%20more%20efficient%20than%20slow%20freezing%20to%20preserve%20ovarian%20stem%20cells%20in%20CF-1%20mice&rft.jtitle=JBRA%20assisted%20reproduction&rft.au=Terraciano,%20Paula%20Barros&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=13-19&rft.issn=1518-0557&rft.eissn=1518-0557&rft_id=info:doi/10.5935/1518-0557.20190057&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2312553240%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2368578314&rft_id=info:pmid/31689043&rfr_iscdi=true