Ovarian tissue vitrification is more efficient than slow freezing to preserve ovarian stem cells in CF-1 mice
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of protocols for mice ovary cryopreservation to compare the differences in Mouse Vasa Homologue expression (a germline cell marker) and ovarian viability after vitrification or slow freezing. Female CF1 mice aged 40-45 days were randomly divided...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JBRA assisted reproduction 2020-01, Vol.24 (1), p.13-19 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 19 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 13 |
container_title | JBRA assisted reproduction |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Terraciano, Paula Barros Garcez, Tuane Alves Berger, Markus Durli, Isabel Kuhl, Cristiana Palma Batista, Vitória de Oliveira Schneider, Raquel de Almeida Festa, Jaquelline Pilar, Emily Ferreira, Charles Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi Lima, Elizabeth Cirne |
description | The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of protocols for mice ovary cryopreservation to compare the differences in Mouse Vasa Homologue expression (a germline cell marker) and ovarian viability after vitrification or slow freezing.
Female CF1 mice aged 40-45 days were randomly divided into three groups: Control, vitrification or slow freezing. Their ovaries were surgically removed, rinsed in saline solution and cryopreserved. For vitrification, we used a commercial protocol and for slow freeze, we used 1.5 M ethylene glycol (EG) as cryoprotectant. After that, the ovaries were processed for histological an immunohistochemical analysis, and counting of primordial, primary, pre-antral and antral follicles.
No significant difference was found in the proportion of high-quality primordial, primary and pre-antral follicles after thawing/warming in the slow freezing and vitrification groups. The immunohistochemistry for MVH antibody demonstrated that the slow freeze group had a higher number of unmarked cells (p=0.012), indicating a harmful effect on the MVH expression in the ovarian tissue, where the cell structure is complex.
Although both protocols indicated similar results in the histological analysis of follicular counts, the vitrification protocol was significantly better to preserve ovarian stem cells, an immature germ cell population. These cells are able to self-renew having regeneration potential, and may be effective for the treatment of ovarian failure and consequently infertility. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5935/1518-0557.20190057 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6993165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2312553240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-412fc4057b38a18c091d96ade2e8bdf609c25f0057a2e2ae28d3538774d427df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVpacI2f6CHIuilF2_0acuXQlnyBYFc2rPQyqNdBdvaSvKG5NdHJpslyWmG0TMv8-pF6DslS9lyeU4lVRWRslkyQltCZPMJnR6Hn9_0J-gspXtCCkYZF-QrOuG0Vi0R_BQNd3sTvRlx9ilNgPc-R--8NdmHEfuEhxABgysjD2PGeVvY1IcH7CLAkx83OAe8i5Ag7gGHg1rKMGALfZ-wH_HqsqJ48Ba-oS_O9AnODnWB_l1e_F1dV7d3VzerP7eVFZzkSlDmrCiW1lwZqixpadfWpgMGat25mrSWSTd7NgyYAaY6LrlqGtEJ1nSOL9DvF93dtB6gs-XyaHq9i34w8VEH4_X7l9Fv9Sbsdd225W9kEfh1EIjh_wQp68Gn2Y8ZIUxJM06ZlJwJUtCfH9D7MMWx2CtUrWSjOBWFYi-UjSGlCO54DCV6DlTPeek5L_0aaFn68dbGceU1Pv4M7jab7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2368578314</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ovarian tissue vitrification is more efficient than slow freezing to preserve ovarian stem cells in CF-1 mice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Terraciano, Paula Barros ; Garcez, Tuane Alves ; Berger, Markus ; Durli, Isabel ; Kuhl, Cristiana Palma ; Batista, Vitória de Oliveira ; Schneider, Raquel de Almeida ; Festa, Jaquelline ; Pilar, Emily ; Ferreira, Charles ; Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi ; Lima, Elizabeth Cirne</creator><creatorcontrib>Terraciano, Paula Barros ; Garcez, Tuane Alves ; Berger, Markus ; Durli, Isabel ; Kuhl, Cristiana Palma ; Batista, Vitória de Oliveira ; Schneider, Raquel de Almeida ; Festa, Jaquelline ; Pilar, Emily ; Ferreira, Charles ; Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi ; Lima, Elizabeth Cirne</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of protocols for mice ovary cryopreservation to compare the differences in Mouse Vasa Homologue expression (a germline cell marker) and ovarian viability after vitrification or slow freezing.
Female CF1 mice aged 40-45 days were randomly divided into three groups: Control, vitrification or slow freezing. Their ovaries were surgically removed, rinsed in saline solution and cryopreserved. For vitrification, we used a commercial protocol and for slow freeze, we used 1.5 M ethylene glycol (EG) as cryoprotectant. After that, the ovaries were processed for histological an immunohistochemical analysis, and counting of primordial, primary, pre-antral and antral follicles.
No significant difference was found in the proportion of high-quality primordial, primary and pre-antral follicles after thawing/warming in the slow freezing and vitrification groups. The immunohistochemistry for MVH antibody demonstrated that the slow freeze group had a higher number of unmarked cells (p=0.012), indicating a harmful effect on the MVH expression in the ovarian tissue, where the cell structure is complex.
Although both protocols indicated similar results in the histological analysis of follicular counts, the vitrification protocol was significantly better to preserve ovarian stem cells, an immature germ cell population. These cells are able to self-renew having regeneration potential, and may be effective for the treatment of ovarian failure and consequently infertility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1518-0557</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1517-5693</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1518-0557</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190057</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31689043</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Humana (Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction)</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cryopreservation ; Cryopreservation - methods ; Drug overdose ; Female ; Fertility ; Fertility Preservation - methods ; Mice ; Nitrogen ; Original ; Ovary - cytology ; Ovary - physiology ; Stem Cells - cytology ; Stem Cells - physiology ; Sucrose ; Vitrification</subject><ispartof>JBRA assisted reproduction, 2020-01, Vol.24 (1), p.13-19</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-412fc4057b38a18c091d96ade2e8bdf609c25f0057a2e2ae28d3538774d427df3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993165/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6993165/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31689043$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Terraciano, Paula Barros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcez, Tuane Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durli, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhl, Cristiana Palma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batista, Vitória de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Raquel de Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Festa, Jaquelline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilar, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Elizabeth Cirne</creatorcontrib><title>Ovarian tissue vitrification is more efficient than slow freezing to preserve ovarian stem cells in CF-1 mice</title><title>JBRA assisted reproduction</title><addtitle>JBRA Assist Reprod</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of protocols for mice ovary cryopreservation to compare the differences in Mouse Vasa Homologue expression (a germline cell marker) and ovarian viability after vitrification or slow freezing.
Female CF1 mice aged 40-45 days were randomly divided into three groups: Control, vitrification or slow freezing. Their ovaries were surgically removed, rinsed in saline solution and cryopreserved. For vitrification, we used a commercial protocol and for slow freeze, we used 1.5 M ethylene glycol (EG) as cryoprotectant. After that, the ovaries were processed for histological an immunohistochemical analysis, and counting of primordial, primary, pre-antral and antral follicles.
No significant difference was found in the proportion of high-quality primordial, primary and pre-antral follicles after thawing/warming in the slow freezing and vitrification groups. The immunohistochemistry for MVH antibody demonstrated that the slow freeze group had a higher number of unmarked cells (p=0.012), indicating a harmful effect on the MVH expression in the ovarian tissue, where the cell structure is complex.
Although both protocols indicated similar results in the histological analysis of follicular counts, the vitrification protocol was significantly better to preserve ovarian stem cells, an immature germ cell population. These cells are able to self-renew having regeneration potential, and may be effective for the treatment of ovarian failure and consequently infertility.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Cryopreservation - methods</subject><subject>Drug overdose</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fertility Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Ovary - cytology</subject><subject>Ovary - physiology</subject><subject>Stem Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Stem Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Sucrose</subject><subject>Vitrification</subject><issn>1518-0557</issn><issn>1517-5693</issn><issn>1518-0557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVpacI2f6CHIuilF2_0acuXQlnyBYFc2rPQyqNdBdvaSvKG5NdHJpslyWmG0TMv8-pF6DslS9lyeU4lVRWRslkyQltCZPMJnR6Hn9_0J-gspXtCCkYZF-QrOuG0Vi0R_BQNd3sTvRlx9ilNgPc-R--8NdmHEfuEhxABgysjD2PGeVvY1IcH7CLAkx83OAe8i5Ag7gGHg1rKMGALfZ-wH_HqsqJ48Ba-oS_O9AnODnWB_l1e_F1dV7d3VzerP7eVFZzkSlDmrCiW1lwZqixpadfWpgMGat25mrSWSTd7NgyYAaY6LrlqGtEJ1nSOL9DvF93dtB6gs-XyaHq9i34w8VEH4_X7l9Fv9Sbsdd225W9kEfh1EIjh_wQp68Gn2Y8ZIUxJM06ZlJwJUtCfH9D7MMWx2CtUrWSjOBWFYi-UjSGlCO54DCV6DlTPeek5L_0aaFn68dbGceU1Pv4M7jab7g</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Terraciano, Paula Barros</creator><creator>Garcez, Tuane Alves</creator><creator>Berger, Markus</creator><creator>Durli, Isabel</creator><creator>Kuhl, Cristiana Palma</creator><creator>Batista, Vitória de Oliveira</creator><creator>Schneider, Raquel de Almeida</creator><creator>Festa, Jaquelline</creator><creator>Pilar, Emily</creator><creator>Ferreira, Charles</creator><creator>Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi</creator><creator>Lima, Elizabeth Cirne</creator><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Humana (Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction)</general><general>Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Ovarian tissue vitrification is more efficient than slow freezing to preserve ovarian stem cells in CF-1 mice</title><author>Terraciano, Paula Barros ; Garcez, Tuane Alves ; Berger, Markus ; Durli, Isabel ; Kuhl, Cristiana Palma ; Batista, Vitória de Oliveira ; Schneider, Raquel de Almeida ; Festa, Jaquelline ; Pilar, Emily ; Ferreira, Charles ; Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi ; Lima, Elizabeth Cirne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-412fc4057b38a18c091d96ade2e8bdf609c25f0057a2e2ae28d3538774d427df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Cryopreservation - methods</topic><topic>Drug overdose</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fertility Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Ovary - cytology</topic><topic>Ovary - physiology</topic><topic>Stem Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Stem Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Sucrose</topic><topic>Vitrification</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Terraciano, Paula Barros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcez, Tuane Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durli, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhl, Cristiana Palma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batista, Vitória de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Raquel de Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Festa, Jaquelline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilar, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Elizabeth Cirne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JBRA assisted reproduction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Terraciano, Paula Barros</au><au>Garcez, Tuane Alves</au><au>Berger, Markus</au><au>Durli, Isabel</au><au>Kuhl, Cristiana Palma</au><au>Batista, Vitória de Oliveira</au><au>Schneider, Raquel de Almeida</au><au>Festa, Jaquelline</au><au>Pilar, Emily</au><au>Ferreira, Charles</au><au>Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi</au><au>Lima, Elizabeth Cirne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ovarian tissue vitrification is more efficient than slow freezing to preserve ovarian stem cells in CF-1 mice</atitle><jtitle>JBRA assisted reproduction</jtitle><addtitle>JBRA Assist Reprod</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>13-19</pages><issn>1518-0557</issn><issn>1517-5693</issn><eissn>1518-0557</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of protocols for mice ovary cryopreservation to compare the differences in Mouse Vasa Homologue expression (a germline cell marker) and ovarian viability after vitrification or slow freezing.
Female CF1 mice aged 40-45 days were randomly divided into three groups: Control, vitrification or slow freezing. Their ovaries were surgically removed, rinsed in saline solution and cryopreserved. For vitrification, we used a commercial protocol and for slow freeze, we used 1.5 M ethylene glycol (EG) as cryoprotectant. After that, the ovaries were processed for histological an immunohistochemical analysis, and counting of primordial, primary, pre-antral and antral follicles.
No significant difference was found in the proportion of high-quality primordial, primary and pre-antral follicles after thawing/warming in the slow freezing and vitrification groups. The immunohistochemistry for MVH antibody demonstrated that the slow freeze group had a higher number of unmarked cells (p=0.012), indicating a harmful effect on the MVH expression in the ovarian tissue, where the cell structure is complex.
Although both protocols indicated similar results in the histological analysis of follicular counts, the vitrification protocol was significantly better to preserve ovarian stem cells, an immature germ cell population. These cells are able to self-renew having regeneration potential, and may be effective for the treatment of ovarian failure and consequently infertility.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Sociedade Brasileira de Reprodução Humana (Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction)</pub><pmid>31689043</pmid><doi>10.5935/1518-0557.20190057</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1518-0557 |
ispartof | JBRA assisted reproduction, 2020-01, Vol.24 (1), p.13-19 |
issn | 1518-0557 1517-5693 1518-0557 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6993165 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animals Cryopreservation Cryopreservation - methods Drug overdose Female Fertility Fertility Preservation - methods Mice Nitrogen Original Ovary - cytology Ovary - physiology Stem Cells - cytology Stem Cells - physiology Sucrose Vitrification |
title | Ovarian tissue vitrification is more efficient than slow freezing to preserve ovarian stem cells in CF-1 mice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A23%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ovarian%20tissue%20vitrification%20is%20more%20efficient%20than%20slow%20freezing%20to%20preserve%20ovarian%20stem%20cells%20in%20CF-1%20mice&rft.jtitle=JBRA%20assisted%20reproduction&rft.au=Terraciano,%20Paula%20Barros&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=13-19&rft.issn=1518-0557&rft.eissn=1518-0557&rft_id=info:doi/10.5935/1518-0557.20190057&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2312553240%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2368578314&rft_id=info:pmid/31689043&rfr_iscdi=true |