Activity of Potential Alternative Treatment Agents for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates Nonsusceptible to Levofloxacin and/or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole

is difficult to treat due to the production of multiple intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of resistance. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) and the fluoroquinolones have traditionally been considered the drugs of choice but are plagued by increasing resistance and adverse drug effects. The obje...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical microbiology 2020-01, Vol.58 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Biagi, M, Tan, X, Wu, T, Jurkovic, M, Vialichka, A, Meyer, K, Mendes, R E, Wenzler, E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Journal of clinical microbiology
container_volume 58
creator Biagi, M
Tan, X
Wu, T
Jurkovic, M
Vialichka, A
Meyer, K
Mendes, R E
Wenzler, E
description is difficult to treat due to the production of multiple intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of resistance. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) and the fluoroquinolones have traditionally been considered the drugs of choice but are plagued by increasing resistance and adverse drug effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the activities of 12 clinically relevant antimicrobials against clinical isolates nonsusceptible to levofloxacin and/or TMP-SMZ. A diverse panel of 41 clinical isolates collected through the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program from 2008 to 2018 was evaluated against ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, chloramphenicol, delafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, eravacycline, minocycline, omadacycline, polymyxin B, and tigecycline. MICs were determined in triplicate via reference broth microdilution and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines where available. MIC distributions and susceptibilities were also compared across infection type, acquisition setting, and geographic origin. Susceptibilities to levofloxacin and TMP-SMZ were 29.3% and 36.6%, respectively. Minocycline displayed the highest susceptibility rate overall (92.7%) and the lowest MIC value (4 mg/liter) of any of the 12 agents tested. Only 3 isolates were resistant to levofloxacin, TMP-SMZ, and minocycline. Polymyxin B and tigecycline were the second most active agents. No significant differences were observed in MIC distributions across the 3 strata evaluated. These data demonstrate that few antimicrobials, old or new, maintain reliable activity against resistant The role of minocycline in the treatment of infections due to warrants further clinical investigation given its potent activity and favorable adverse effect profile.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/JCM.01603-19
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6989059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2316783955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-53399f58062d5cd63e91643a2d45b8d64d4916256c488b9e8bdd491a3b20ad4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtPGzEUha2qVQnQXdeVl110wB4_Ym8qRVEfoPQhEaTuLM-Mh7jyzA22JwJ-TX8qDlDUbnx17zn6fK8OQm8pOaG0Vqfny28nhErCKqpfoBklWlVSkl8v0YwQLSpK2fwAHab0mxDKuRCv0QGjc64YVTP0Z9Fmv_P5FkOPf0J2Y_Y24EXILo62SA6vo7N5KAJeXJU34R4ivihOyBG2GxhgtAkPNuTS-eAtPksQbHYJf4cxTal12-yb4HAGvHI76APc2NaP2I7daWGtox9c3sC21OpiCr19aG_sHQR3jF71NiT35qkeocvPn9bLr9Xqx5ez5WJVtVyQXAnGtO6FIrLuRNtJ5jSVnNm646JRneQdL4NayJYr1Winmm4_saypie14w47Qx0fudmoG17Xl0miD2e9k460B683_yug35gp2RmqlidAF8P4JEOF6cimbwZfTQ7CjgymZmlE5V0wLUawfHq1thJSi65-_ocTsQzUlVPMQqqF78rt_V3s2_02R3QPBEKMh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2316783955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Activity of Potential Alternative Treatment Agents for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates Nonsusceptible to Levofloxacin and/or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Biagi, M ; Tan, X ; Wu, T ; Jurkovic, M ; Vialichka, A ; Meyer, K ; Mendes, R E ; Wenzler, E</creator><contributor>Ledeboer, Nathan A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Biagi, M ; Tan, X ; Wu, T ; Jurkovic, M ; Vialichka, A ; Meyer, K ; Mendes, R E ; Wenzler, E ; Ledeboer, Nathan A.</creatorcontrib><description>is difficult to treat due to the production of multiple intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of resistance. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) and the fluoroquinolones have traditionally been considered the drugs of choice but are plagued by increasing resistance and adverse drug effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the activities of 12 clinically relevant antimicrobials against clinical isolates nonsusceptible to levofloxacin and/or TMP-SMZ. A diverse panel of 41 clinical isolates collected through the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program from 2008 to 2018 was evaluated against ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, chloramphenicol, delafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, eravacycline, minocycline, omadacycline, polymyxin B, and tigecycline. MICs were determined in triplicate via reference broth microdilution and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines where available. MIC distributions and susceptibilities were also compared across infection type, acquisition setting, and geographic origin. Susceptibilities to levofloxacin and TMP-SMZ were 29.3% and 36.6%, respectively. Minocycline displayed the highest susceptibility rate overall (92.7%) and the lowest MIC value (4 mg/liter) of any of the 12 agents tested. Only 3 isolates were resistant to levofloxacin, TMP-SMZ, and minocycline. Polymyxin B and tigecycline were the second most active agents. No significant differences were observed in MIC distributions across the 3 strata evaluated. These data demonstrate that few antimicrobials, old or new, maintain reliable activity against resistant The role of minocycline in the treatment of infections due to warrants further clinical investigation given its potent activity and favorable adverse effect profile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01603-19</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31748318</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - classification ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Bacteriology ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial ; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - drug therapy ; Humans ; Levofloxacin - pharmacology ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia - classification ; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia - drug effects ; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020-01, Vol.58 (2)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology. 2020 American Society for Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-53399f58062d5cd63e91643a2d45b8d64d4916256c488b9e8bdd491a3b20ad4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-53399f58062d5cd63e91643a2d45b8d64d4916256c488b9e8bdd491a3b20ad4b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3914-8400</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6989059/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6989059/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,3177,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31748318$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ledeboer, Nathan A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Biagi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurkovic, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vialichka, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, R E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzler, E</creatorcontrib><title>Activity of Potential Alternative Treatment Agents for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates Nonsusceptible to Levofloxacin and/or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>is difficult to treat due to the production of multiple intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of resistance. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) and the fluoroquinolones have traditionally been considered the drugs of choice but are plagued by increasing resistance and adverse drug effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the activities of 12 clinically relevant antimicrobials against clinical isolates nonsusceptible to levofloxacin and/or TMP-SMZ. A diverse panel of 41 clinical isolates collected through the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program from 2008 to 2018 was evaluated against ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, chloramphenicol, delafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, eravacycline, minocycline, omadacycline, polymyxin B, and tigecycline. MICs were determined in triplicate via reference broth microdilution and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines where available. MIC distributions and susceptibilities were also compared across infection type, acquisition setting, and geographic origin. Susceptibilities to levofloxacin and TMP-SMZ were 29.3% and 36.6%, respectively. Minocycline displayed the highest susceptibility rate overall (92.7%) and the lowest MIC value (4 mg/liter) of any of the 12 agents tested. Only 3 isolates were resistant to levofloxacin, TMP-SMZ, and minocycline. Polymyxin B and tigecycline were the second most active agents. No significant differences were observed in MIC distributions across the 3 strata evaluated. These data demonstrate that few antimicrobials, old or new, maintain reliable activity against resistant The role of minocycline in the treatment of infections due to warrants further clinical investigation given its potent activity and favorable adverse effect profile.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - classification</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</subject><subject>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Levofloxacin - pharmacology</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia - classification</subject><subject>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia - drug effects</subject><subject>Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination - pharmacology</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtPGzEUha2qVQnQXdeVl110wB4_Ym8qRVEfoPQhEaTuLM-Mh7jyzA22JwJ-TX8qDlDUbnx17zn6fK8OQm8pOaG0Vqfny28nhErCKqpfoBklWlVSkl8v0YwQLSpK2fwAHab0mxDKuRCv0QGjc64YVTP0Z9Fmv_P5FkOPf0J2Y_Y24EXILo62SA6vo7N5KAJeXJU34R4ivihOyBG2GxhgtAkPNuTS-eAtPksQbHYJf4cxTal12-yb4HAGvHI76APc2NaP2I7daWGtox9c3sC21OpiCr19aG_sHQR3jF71NiT35qkeocvPn9bLr9Xqx5ez5WJVtVyQXAnGtO6FIrLuRNtJ5jSVnNm646JRneQdL4NayJYr1Winmm4_saypie14w47Qx0fudmoG17Xl0miD2e9k460B683_yug35gp2RmqlidAF8P4JEOF6cimbwZfTQ7CjgymZmlE5V0wLUawfHq1thJSi65-_ocTsQzUlVPMQqqF78rt_V3s2_02R3QPBEKMh</recordid><startdate>20200128</startdate><enddate>20200128</enddate><creator>Biagi, M</creator><creator>Tan, X</creator><creator>Wu, T</creator><creator>Jurkovic, M</creator><creator>Vialichka, A</creator><creator>Meyer, K</creator><creator>Mendes, R E</creator><creator>Wenzler, E</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3914-8400</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200128</creationdate><title>Activity of Potential Alternative Treatment Agents for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates Nonsusceptible to Levofloxacin and/or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole</title><author>Biagi, M ; Tan, X ; Wu, T ; Jurkovic, M ; Vialichka, A ; Meyer, K ; Mendes, R E ; Wenzler, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-53399f58062d5cd63e91643a2d45b8d64d4916256c488b9e8bdd491a3b20ad4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - classification</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</topic><topic>Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Levofloxacin - pharmacology</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia - classification</topic><topic>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia - drug effects</topic><topic>Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biagi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, X</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurkovic, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vialichka, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, R E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzler, E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biagi, M</au><au>Tan, X</au><au>Wu, T</au><au>Jurkovic, M</au><au>Vialichka, A</au><au>Meyer, K</au><au>Mendes, R E</au><au>Wenzler, E</au><au>Ledeboer, Nathan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Activity of Potential Alternative Treatment Agents for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates Nonsusceptible to Levofloxacin and/or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2020-01-28</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>0095-1137</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>is difficult to treat due to the production of multiple intrinsic and acquired mechanisms of resistance. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) and the fluoroquinolones have traditionally been considered the drugs of choice but are plagued by increasing resistance and adverse drug effects. The objective of this study was to evaluate the activities of 12 clinically relevant antimicrobials against clinical isolates nonsusceptible to levofloxacin and/or TMP-SMZ. A diverse panel of 41 clinical isolates collected through the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program from 2008 to 2018 was evaluated against ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, chloramphenicol, delafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, eravacycline, minocycline, omadacycline, polymyxin B, and tigecycline. MICs were determined in triplicate via reference broth microdilution and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines where available. MIC distributions and susceptibilities were also compared across infection type, acquisition setting, and geographic origin. Susceptibilities to levofloxacin and TMP-SMZ were 29.3% and 36.6%, respectively. Minocycline displayed the highest susceptibility rate overall (92.7%) and the lowest MIC value (4 mg/liter) of any of the 12 agents tested. Only 3 isolates were resistant to levofloxacin, TMP-SMZ, and minocycline. Polymyxin B and tigecycline were the second most active agents. No significant differences were observed in MIC distributions across the 3 strata evaluated. These data demonstrate that few antimicrobials, old or new, maintain reliable activity against resistant The role of minocycline in the treatment of infections due to warrants further clinical investigation given its potent activity and favorable adverse effect profile.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>31748318</pmid><doi>10.1128/JCM.01603-19</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3914-8400</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-1137
ispartof Journal of clinical microbiology, 2020-01, Vol.58 (2)
issn 0095-1137
1098-660X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6989059
source American Society for Microbiology; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Anti-Bacterial Agents - classification
Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology
Bacteriology
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - drug therapy
Humans
Levofloxacin - pharmacology
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia - classification
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia - drug effects
Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination - pharmacology
title Activity of Potential Alternative Treatment Agents for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates Nonsusceptible to Levofloxacin and/or Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A04%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Activity%20of%20Potential%20Alternative%20Treatment%20Agents%20for%20Stenotrophomonas%20maltophilia%20Isolates%20Nonsusceptible%20to%20Levofloxacin%20and/or%20Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Biagi,%20M&rft.date=2020-01-28&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/JCM.01603-19&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2316783955%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2316783955&rft_id=info:pmid/31748318&rfr_iscdi=true