Relative Humidity on Mars: New Results From the Phoenix TECP Sensor

In situ measurements of relative humidity (RH) on Mars have only been performed by the Phoenix (PHX) and Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) missions. Here we present results of our recalibration of the PHX thermal and electrical conductivity probe (TECP) RH sensor. This recalibration was conducted using...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Planets 2019-11, Vol.124 (11), p.2780-2792
Hauptverfasser: Fischer, E., Martínez, G. M., Rennó, N. O., Tamppari, L. K., Zent, A. P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2792
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2780
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Planets
container_volume 124
creator Fischer, E.
Martínez, G. M.
Rennó, N. O.
Tamppari, L. K.
Zent, A. P.
description In situ measurements of relative humidity (RH) on Mars have only been performed by the Phoenix (PHX) and Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) missions. Here we present results of our recalibration of the PHX thermal and electrical conductivity probe (TECP) RH sensor. This recalibration was conducted using a TECP engineering model subjected to the full range of environmental conditions at the PHX landing site in the Michigan Mars Environmental Chamber. The experiments focused on the warmest and driest conditions (daytime) because they were not covered in the original calibration (Zent et al., 2010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JE003420) and previous recalibration (Zent et al., 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JE004933). In nighttime conditions, our results are in excellent agreement with the previous 2016 recalibration, while in daytime conditions, our results show larger water vapor pressure values. We obtain vapor pressure values in the range ~0.005–1.4 Pa, while Zent et al. (2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JE004933) obtain values in the range ~0.004–0.4 Pa. Our higher daytime values are in better agreement with independent estimates from the ground by the PHX Surface Stereo Imager instrument and from orbit by Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars. Our results imply larger day‐to‐night ratios of water vapor pressure at PHX compared to MSL, suggesting a stronger atmosphere‐regolith interchange in the Martian arctic than at lower latitudes. Further, they indicate that brine formation at the PHX landing site via deliquescence can be achieved only temporarily between midnight and 6 a.m. on a few sols. The results from our recalibration are important because they shed light on the near‐surface humidity environment on Mars. Key Points We have recalibrated the relative humidity sensor of the Mars Phoenix lander We obtain water vapor pressure values in the range ~0.005–1.4 Pa, while in previous recalibrations, values in the range ~0.004–0.4 Pa Our results show a two‐order‐of‐magnitude diurnal variation of water vapor pressure, suggesting a strong atmosphere‐regolith interchange Plain Language Summary We present our recalibration of Phoenix's humidity sensor. This recalibration was conducted with a copy of the sensor subjected to the environmental conditions at the Phoenix landing site. Our experiments focus on the warmest and driest conditions because they were not covered in previous calibrations. Our recalibration shows daytime water content values on
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019JE006080
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6988475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2352054208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4560-17cb140468bc068befa03ce487eef6480c7283fbe04a18dab99343bbd96afd683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhq2qFSDKjXNlqZceWBh_JLF7qFStdhcQFLTQs-Ukk65RElM7AfbfY7SAKIfOYcYaP3rH45eQfQaHDLg-4sD06QwgBwUfyA5nuZ5oBvDx5Qy62CZ7Md5ACpVaTGyRbcGBZzLLdsh0ia0d3B3S47FztRvW1Pf03Ib4nf7Ce7rEOLZDpPPgOzqskF6uPPbugV7Pppf0Cvvow2fyqbFtxL3nukt-z2fX0-PJ2cXiZPrzbFLJLIcJK6qSSZC5KitICRsLokKpCsQmlwqqgivRlAjSMlXbUmshRVnWOrdNnSuxS35sdG_HssO6wn4ItjW3wXU2rI23zvx707uV-ePvTK6VkkWWBL49CwT_d8Q4mM7FCtvW9ujHaLjIOGSSw9Osr-_QGz-GPq2XKJ6-WHPJEnWwoargYwzYvD6GgXkyyLw1KOFf3i7wCr_YkQCxAe5di-v_ipnTxXLGGRcgHgHt65gq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2329109241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relative Humidity on Mars: New Results From the Phoenix TECP Sensor</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fischer, E. ; Martínez, G. M. ; Rennó, N. O. ; Tamppari, L. K. ; Zent, A. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fischer, E. ; Martínez, G. M. ; Rennó, N. O. ; Tamppari, L. K. ; Zent, A. P.</creatorcontrib><description>In situ measurements of relative humidity (RH) on Mars have only been performed by the Phoenix (PHX) and Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) missions. Here we present results of our recalibration of the PHX thermal and electrical conductivity probe (TECP) RH sensor. This recalibration was conducted using a TECP engineering model subjected to the full range of environmental conditions at the PHX landing site in the Michigan Mars Environmental Chamber. The experiments focused on the warmest and driest conditions (daytime) because they were not covered in the original calibration (Zent et al., 2010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JE003420) and previous recalibration (Zent et al., 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JE004933). In nighttime conditions, our results are in excellent agreement with the previous 2016 recalibration, while in daytime conditions, our results show larger water vapor pressure values. We obtain vapor pressure values in the range ~0.005–1.4 Pa, while Zent et al. (2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JE004933) obtain values in the range ~0.004–0.4 Pa. Our higher daytime values are in better agreement with independent estimates from the ground by the PHX Surface Stereo Imager instrument and from orbit by Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars. Our results imply larger day‐to‐night ratios of water vapor pressure at PHX compared to MSL, suggesting a stronger atmosphere‐regolith interchange in the Martian arctic than at lower latitudes. Further, they indicate that brine formation at the PHX landing site via deliquescence can be achieved only temporarily between midnight and 6 a.m. on a few sols. The results from our recalibration are important because they shed light on the near‐surface humidity environment on Mars. Key Points We have recalibrated the relative humidity sensor of the Mars Phoenix lander We obtain water vapor pressure values in the range ~0.005–1.4 Pa, while in previous recalibrations, values in the range ~0.004–0.4 Pa Our results show a two‐order‐of‐magnitude diurnal variation of water vapor pressure, suggesting a strong atmosphere‐regolith interchange Plain Language Summary We present our recalibration of Phoenix's humidity sensor. This recalibration was conducted with a copy of the sensor subjected to the environmental conditions at the Phoenix landing site. Our experiments focus on the warmest and driest conditions because they were not covered in previous calibrations. Our recalibration shows daytime water content values one order of magnitude larger than those in the previous calibration. At nighttime conditions, our results are in excellent agreement with the previous calibration. Our higher daytime values are in better agreement with independent estimates from the ground, and from orbit. Our results imply larger diurnal variations of water content at Phoenix compared to Curiosity, suggesting a stronger atmosphere‐soil interchange in the Martian arctic than at lower latitudes. Further, they indicate that environmental conditions favorable for the formation of saline solutions (brine) are only achieved temporarily between midnight and 6 a.m. on a few Martian days. The results from our recalibration are important because measurements of humidity on the Martian surface are needed to shed light on the local and global water cycle of Mars, and so far, only the Phoenix mission in the arctic region and the Curiosity rover at equatorial latitudes have performed such measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9100</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JE006080</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32025455</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Arctic zone ; Atmosphere ; Atmospheres ; Atmospheric Composition and Structure ; Atmospheric Processes ; Brines ; Calibration ; Curiosity (Mars rover) ; Daytime ; Diurnal variations ; Electrical conductivity ; Electrical resistivity ; Environmental conditions ; Equatorial regions ; Geochemistry ; Humidity ; Humidity measurement ; Hydrologic cycle ; Hygroscopicity ; In situ measurement ; Instruments and Techniques ; Latitude ; Mars ; Mars environment ; Mars missions ; Mars rovers ; Mars surface ; Meteorology ; Moisture content ; Night ; Phoenix ; Planetary Atmospheres ; Planetary Geochemistry ; Planetary Meteorology ; Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects ; Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets ; Polar Regions ; Regolith ; Relative humidity ; Saline solutions ; Saline water ; Sensors ; TECP ; Test chambers ; Vapor pressure ; Water content ; water cycle ; Water vapor</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Planets, 2019-11, Vol.124 (11), p.2780-2792</ispartof><rights>2019. The Authors.</rights><rights>2019. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4560-17cb140468bc068befa03ce487eef6480c7283fbe04a18dab99343bbd96afd683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4560-17cb140468bc068befa03ce487eef6480c7283fbe04a18dab99343bbd96afd683</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2098-5295 ; 0000-0001-5124-6375 ; 0000-0001-5885-236X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019JE006080$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019JE006080$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,1433,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025455$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fischer, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rennó, N. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamppari, L. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zent, A. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Relative Humidity on Mars: New Results From the Phoenix TECP Sensor</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Planets</title><addtitle>J Geophys Res Planets</addtitle><description>In situ measurements of relative humidity (RH) on Mars have only been performed by the Phoenix (PHX) and Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) missions. Here we present results of our recalibration of the PHX thermal and electrical conductivity probe (TECP) RH sensor. This recalibration was conducted using a TECP engineering model subjected to the full range of environmental conditions at the PHX landing site in the Michigan Mars Environmental Chamber. The experiments focused on the warmest and driest conditions (daytime) because they were not covered in the original calibration (Zent et al., 2010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JE003420) and previous recalibration (Zent et al., 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JE004933). In nighttime conditions, our results are in excellent agreement with the previous 2016 recalibration, while in daytime conditions, our results show larger water vapor pressure values. We obtain vapor pressure values in the range ~0.005–1.4 Pa, while Zent et al. (2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JE004933) obtain values in the range ~0.004–0.4 Pa. Our higher daytime values are in better agreement with independent estimates from the ground by the PHX Surface Stereo Imager instrument and from orbit by Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars. Our results imply larger day‐to‐night ratios of water vapor pressure at PHX compared to MSL, suggesting a stronger atmosphere‐regolith interchange in the Martian arctic than at lower latitudes. Further, they indicate that brine formation at the PHX landing site via deliquescence can be achieved only temporarily between midnight and 6 a.m. on a few sols. The results from our recalibration are important because they shed light on the near‐surface humidity environment on Mars. Key Points We have recalibrated the relative humidity sensor of the Mars Phoenix lander We obtain water vapor pressure values in the range ~0.005–1.4 Pa, while in previous recalibrations, values in the range ~0.004–0.4 Pa Our results show a two‐order‐of‐magnitude diurnal variation of water vapor pressure, suggesting a strong atmosphere‐regolith interchange Plain Language Summary We present our recalibration of Phoenix's humidity sensor. This recalibration was conducted with a copy of the sensor subjected to the environmental conditions at the Phoenix landing site. Our experiments focus on the warmest and driest conditions because they were not covered in previous calibrations. Our recalibration shows daytime water content values one order of magnitude larger than those in the previous calibration. At nighttime conditions, our results are in excellent agreement with the previous calibration. Our higher daytime values are in better agreement with independent estimates from the ground, and from orbit. Our results imply larger diurnal variations of water content at Phoenix compared to Curiosity, suggesting a stronger atmosphere‐soil interchange in the Martian arctic than at lower latitudes. Further, they indicate that environmental conditions favorable for the formation of saline solutions (brine) are only achieved temporarily between midnight and 6 a.m. on a few Martian days. The results from our recalibration are important because measurements of humidity on the Martian surface are needed to shed light on the local and global water cycle of Mars, and so far, only the Phoenix mission in the arctic region and the Curiosity rover at equatorial latitudes have performed such measurements.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Arctic zone</subject><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Atmospheres</subject><subject>Atmospheric Composition and Structure</subject><subject>Atmospheric Processes</subject><subject>Brines</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Curiosity (Mars rover)</subject><subject>Daytime</subject><subject>Diurnal variations</subject><subject>Electrical conductivity</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Equatorial regions</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Humidity</subject><subject>Humidity measurement</subject><subject>Hydrologic cycle</subject><subject>Hygroscopicity</subject><subject>In situ measurement</subject><subject>Instruments and Techniques</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>Mars</subject><subject>Mars environment</subject><subject>Mars missions</subject><subject>Mars rovers</subject><subject>Mars surface</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Night</subject><subject>Phoenix</subject><subject>Planetary Atmospheres</subject><subject>Planetary Geochemistry</subject><subject>Planetary Meteorology</subject><subject>Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects</subject><subject>Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets</subject><subject>Polar Regions</subject><subject>Regolith</subject><subject>Relative humidity</subject><subject>Saline solutions</subject><subject>Saline water</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>TECP</subject><subject>Test chambers</subject><subject>Vapor pressure</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>water cycle</subject><subject>Water vapor</subject><issn>2169-9097</issn><issn>2169-9100</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhq2qFSDKjXNlqZceWBh_JLF7qFStdhcQFLTQs-Ukk65RElM7AfbfY7SAKIfOYcYaP3rH45eQfQaHDLg-4sD06QwgBwUfyA5nuZ5oBvDx5Qy62CZ7Md5ACpVaTGyRbcGBZzLLdsh0ia0d3B3S47FztRvW1Pf03Ib4nf7Ce7rEOLZDpPPgOzqskF6uPPbugV7Pppf0Cvvow2fyqbFtxL3nukt-z2fX0-PJ2cXiZPrzbFLJLIcJK6qSSZC5KitICRsLokKpCsQmlwqqgivRlAjSMlXbUmshRVnWOrdNnSuxS35sdG_HssO6wn4ItjW3wXU2rI23zvx707uV-ePvTK6VkkWWBL49CwT_d8Q4mM7FCtvW9ujHaLjIOGSSw9Osr-_QGz-GPq2XKJ6-WHPJEnWwoargYwzYvD6GgXkyyLw1KOFf3i7wCr_YkQCxAe5di-v_ipnTxXLGGRcgHgHt65gq</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Fischer, E.</creator><creator>Martínez, G. M.</creator><creator>Rennó, N. O.</creator><creator>Tamppari, L. K.</creator><creator>Zent, A. P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2098-5295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5124-6375</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5885-236X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Relative Humidity on Mars: New Results From the Phoenix TECP Sensor</title><author>Fischer, E. ; Martínez, G. M. ; Rennó, N. O. ; Tamppari, L. K. ; Zent, A. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4560-17cb140468bc068befa03ce487eef6480c7283fbe04a18dab99343bbd96afd683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Arctic zone</topic><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Atmospheres</topic><topic>Atmospheric Composition and Structure</topic><topic>Atmospheric Processes</topic><topic>Brines</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Curiosity (Mars rover)</topic><topic>Daytime</topic><topic>Diurnal variations</topic><topic>Electrical conductivity</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Equatorial regions</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Humidity</topic><topic>Humidity measurement</topic><topic>Hydrologic cycle</topic><topic>Hygroscopicity</topic><topic>In situ measurement</topic><topic>Instruments and Techniques</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>Mars</topic><topic>Mars environment</topic><topic>Mars missions</topic><topic>Mars rovers</topic><topic>Mars surface</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Night</topic><topic>Phoenix</topic><topic>Planetary Atmospheres</topic><topic>Planetary Geochemistry</topic><topic>Planetary Meteorology</topic><topic>Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects</topic><topic>Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets</topic><topic>Polar Regions</topic><topic>Regolith</topic><topic>Relative humidity</topic><topic>Saline solutions</topic><topic>Saline water</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>TECP</topic><topic>Test chambers</topic><topic>Vapor pressure</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>water cycle</topic><topic>Water vapor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fischer, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rennó, N. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamppari, L. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zent, A. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Planets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fischer, E.</au><au>Martínez, G. M.</au><au>Rennó, N. O.</au><au>Tamppari, L. K.</au><au>Zent, A. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relative Humidity on Mars: New Results From the Phoenix TECP Sensor</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Planets</jtitle><addtitle>J Geophys Res Planets</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2780</spage><epage>2792</epage><pages>2780-2792</pages><issn>2169-9097</issn><eissn>2169-9100</eissn><abstract>In situ measurements of relative humidity (RH) on Mars have only been performed by the Phoenix (PHX) and Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) missions. Here we present results of our recalibration of the PHX thermal and electrical conductivity probe (TECP) RH sensor. This recalibration was conducted using a TECP engineering model subjected to the full range of environmental conditions at the PHX landing site in the Michigan Mars Environmental Chamber. The experiments focused on the warmest and driest conditions (daytime) because they were not covered in the original calibration (Zent et al., 2010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JE003420) and previous recalibration (Zent et al., 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JE004933). In nighttime conditions, our results are in excellent agreement with the previous 2016 recalibration, while in daytime conditions, our results show larger water vapor pressure values. We obtain vapor pressure values in the range ~0.005–1.4 Pa, while Zent et al. (2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JE004933) obtain values in the range ~0.004–0.4 Pa. Our higher daytime values are in better agreement with independent estimates from the ground by the PHX Surface Stereo Imager instrument and from orbit by Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars. Our results imply larger day‐to‐night ratios of water vapor pressure at PHX compared to MSL, suggesting a stronger atmosphere‐regolith interchange in the Martian arctic than at lower latitudes. Further, they indicate that brine formation at the PHX landing site via deliquescence can be achieved only temporarily between midnight and 6 a.m. on a few sols. The results from our recalibration are important because they shed light on the near‐surface humidity environment on Mars. Key Points We have recalibrated the relative humidity sensor of the Mars Phoenix lander We obtain water vapor pressure values in the range ~0.005–1.4 Pa, while in previous recalibrations, values in the range ~0.004–0.4 Pa Our results show a two‐order‐of‐magnitude diurnal variation of water vapor pressure, suggesting a strong atmosphere‐regolith interchange Plain Language Summary We present our recalibration of Phoenix's humidity sensor. This recalibration was conducted with a copy of the sensor subjected to the environmental conditions at the Phoenix landing site. Our experiments focus on the warmest and driest conditions because they were not covered in previous calibrations. Our recalibration shows daytime water content values one order of magnitude larger than those in the previous calibration. At nighttime conditions, our results are in excellent agreement with the previous calibration. Our higher daytime values are in better agreement with independent estimates from the ground, and from orbit. Our results imply larger diurnal variations of water content at Phoenix compared to Curiosity, suggesting a stronger atmosphere‐soil interchange in the Martian arctic than at lower latitudes. Further, they indicate that environmental conditions favorable for the formation of saline solutions (brine) are only achieved temporarily between midnight and 6 a.m. on a few Martian days. The results from our recalibration are important because measurements of humidity on the Martian surface are needed to shed light on the local and global water cycle of Mars, and so far, only the Phoenix mission in the arctic region and the Curiosity rover at equatorial latitudes have performed such measurements.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>32025455</pmid><doi>10.1029/2019JE006080</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2098-5295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5124-6375</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5885-236X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9097
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Planets, 2019-11, Vol.124 (11), p.2780-2792
issn 2169-9097
2169-9100
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6988475
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agreements
Arctic zone
Atmosphere
Atmospheres
Atmospheric Composition and Structure
Atmospheric Processes
Brines
Calibration
Curiosity (Mars rover)
Daytime
Diurnal variations
Electrical conductivity
Electrical resistivity
Environmental conditions
Equatorial regions
Geochemistry
Humidity
Humidity measurement
Hydrologic cycle
Hygroscopicity
In situ measurement
Instruments and Techniques
Latitude
Mars
Mars environment
Mars missions
Mars rovers
Mars surface
Meteorology
Moisture content
Night
Phoenix
Planetary Atmospheres
Planetary Geochemistry
Planetary Meteorology
Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects
Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets
Polar Regions
Regolith
Relative humidity
Saline solutions
Saline water
Sensors
TECP
Test chambers
Vapor pressure
Water content
water cycle
Water vapor
title Relative Humidity on Mars: New Results From the Phoenix TECP Sensor
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A29%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relative%20Humidity%20on%20Mars:%20New%20Results%20From%20the%20Phoenix%20TECP%20Sensor&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Planets&rft.au=Fischer,%20E.&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2780&rft.epage=2792&rft.pages=2780-2792&rft.issn=2169-9097&rft.eissn=2169-9100&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JE006080&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2352054208%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2329109241&rft_id=info:pmid/32025455&rfr_iscdi=true