Patterns of intergenerational child protective services involvement

Prior research on Child Protective Services (CPS) involvement among at-risk youth focuses on their roles as parents perpetrating maltreatment against biological offspring. Given family complexity and assortative partnering, measuring all CPS involvement – as perpetrators and non-offending parents of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child abuse & neglect 2020-01, Vol.99, p.104247-104247, Article 104247
Hauptverfasser: Font, Sarah, Cancian, Maria, Berger, Lawrence M., DiGiovanni, Anna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104247
container_issue
container_start_page 104247
container_title Child abuse & neglect
container_volume 99
creator Font, Sarah
Cancian, Maria
Berger, Lawrence M.
DiGiovanni, Anna
description Prior research on Child Protective Services (CPS) involvement among at-risk youth focuses on their roles as parents perpetrating maltreatment against biological offspring. Given family complexity and assortative partnering, measuring all CPS involvement – as perpetrators and non-offending parents of victims – provides new insight into intergenerational maltreatment patterns. Our objective was to investigate the risk of multiple forms of parent or perpetrator CPS involvement (PP-CPS) by age 25, among those exposed to three forms of adversity in their late teens (at ages 14–17): alleged victim on a CPS investigation, out-of-home care (OHC), and poverty. We used a sample of 36,475 individuals born in 1990–1991 from the Wisconsin Data Core longitudinal administrative database, and tracked their involvement in CPS, OHC, and the food assistance program (SNAP) over time. Our sample consisted of individuals who, at ages 14–17, met one of the following criteria: were in OHC; had CPS involvement as a victim but no OHC (CPSV group), or received food assistance without CPSV or OHC (SNAP group). Using logistic regression, we modeled four forms of PP-CPS involvement: parent-perpetrator, resident parent non-perpetrator, nonresident parent non-perpetrator, and non-biological parent-perpetrator. Predicted risks of any PP-CPS involvement by age 25 were 10 % (SNAP group), 17–22 % (CPSV group), and 26–33 % (OHC group); among OHC youth known to have a biological child, rates exceeded 40 %. The proportion of CPS involvement that involved parent-perpetration varied substantially by sex and adversity type. Focusing only on intergenerational maltreatment in which the parents are the perpetrators may substantially understate the risk of maltreatment recurring across generations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104247
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6984680</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0145213419304247</els_id><sourcerecordid>2345519439</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-d5f59f61f868bf668b61865a94f55396affbe1929bce7900b4865b3cda3f89493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1P3DAQtRAVLLT_oKoiceGSxY4_Yl-Q0IqPSkj0AGfLccbgVTZe7CQS_x5HC7RwqA_2yPPmzcx7CP0keEkwEWfrpX3yphmXFSYqf7GK1XtoQWRNy7rm9T5aYMJ4WRHKDtFRSmucD6_5ATqkpCacE7lAqz9mGCD2qQiu8H0OH6GHaAYfetMVuUXXFtsYBrCDn6BIECdvIWXsFLoJNtAP39E3Z7oEP97eY_RwdXm_uilv765_ry5uS8sUGcqWO66cIE4K2TiRL0Gk4EYxxzlVwjjXAFGVaizUCuOG5WxDbWuok4opeozOd7zbsdlAa3PraDq9jX5j4osOxuvPmd4_6ccwaaEkExJngtM3ghieR0iD3vhkoetMD2FMuqJkVlEwmaEnX6DrMMYsyYxiWTvF6DwR26FsDClFcB_DEKxnl_Ra71zSs0t651Iu-_XvIh9F77b83RSynJOHqJP10FtofcxG6Db4_3d4BQrwpi0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2345519439</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patterns of intergenerational child protective services involvement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Font, Sarah ; Cancian, Maria ; Berger, Lawrence M. ; DiGiovanni, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Font, Sarah ; Cancian, Maria ; Berger, Lawrence M. ; DiGiovanni, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>Prior research on Child Protective Services (CPS) involvement among at-risk youth focuses on their roles as parents perpetrating maltreatment against biological offspring. Given family complexity and assortative partnering, measuring all CPS involvement – as perpetrators and non-offending parents of victims – provides new insight into intergenerational maltreatment patterns. Our objective was to investigate the risk of multiple forms of parent or perpetrator CPS involvement (PP-CPS) by age 25, among those exposed to three forms of adversity in their late teens (at ages 14–17): alleged victim on a CPS investigation, out-of-home care (OHC), and poverty. We used a sample of 36,475 individuals born in 1990–1991 from the Wisconsin Data Core longitudinal administrative database, and tracked their involvement in CPS, OHC, and the food assistance program (SNAP) over time. Our sample consisted of individuals who, at ages 14–17, met one of the following criteria: were in OHC; had CPS involvement as a victim but no OHC (CPSV group), or received food assistance without CPSV or OHC (SNAP group). Using logistic regression, we modeled four forms of PP-CPS involvement: parent-perpetrator, resident parent non-perpetrator, nonresident parent non-perpetrator, and non-biological parent-perpetrator. Predicted risks of any PP-CPS involvement by age 25 were 10 % (SNAP group), 17–22 % (CPSV group), and 26–33 % (OHC group); among OHC youth known to have a biological child, rates exceeded 40 %. The proportion of CPS involvement that involved parent-perpetration varied substantially by sex and adversity type. Focusing only on intergenerational maltreatment in which the parents are the perpetrators may substantially understate the risk of maltreatment recurring across generations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-2134</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7757</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104247</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31715518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adolescents ; Adverse Childhood Experiences ; Adversity ; At risk populations ; Child Abuse ; Child Protective Services ; Child Welfare ; Children ; Female ; Food ; Food Assistance ; Home health care ; Homogamy ; Humans ; Insight ; Inter-generational ; Intergenerational relationships ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Maltreatment ; Natural parents ; Offending ; Parenting ; Parents ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Participation ; Perpetrator ; Perpetrators ; Poverty ; Risk ; Victims ; Wisconsin ; Young Adult ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Child abuse &amp; neglect, 2020-01, Vol.99, p.104247-104247, Article 104247</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Jan 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-d5f59f61f868bf668b61865a94f55396affbe1929bce7900b4865b3cda3f89493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-d5f59f61f868bf668b61865a94f55396affbe1929bce7900b4865b3cda3f89493</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4022-5517 ; 0000-0002-7913-1059</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104247$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,30999,33774,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31715518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Font, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cancian, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Lawrence M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiGiovanni, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Patterns of intergenerational child protective services involvement</title><title>Child abuse &amp; neglect</title><addtitle>Child Abuse Negl</addtitle><description>Prior research on Child Protective Services (CPS) involvement among at-risk youth focuses on their roles as parents perpetrating maltreatment against biological offspring. Given family complexity and assortative partnering, measuring all CPS involvement – as perpetrators and non-offending parents of victims – provides new insight into intergenerational maltreatment patterns. Our objective was to investigate the risk of multiple forms of parent or perpetrator CPS involvement (PP-CPS) by age 25, among those exposed to three forms of adversity in their late teens (at ages 14–17): alleged victim on a CPS investigation, out-of-home care (OHC), and poverty. We used a sample of 36,475 individuals born in 1990–1991 from the Wisconsin Data Core longitudinal administrative database, and tracked their involvement in CPS, OHC, and the food assistance program (SNAP) over time. Our sample consisted of individuals who, at ages 14–17, met one of the following criteria: were in OHC; had CPS involvement as a victim but no OHC (CPSV group), or received food assistance without CPSV or OHC (SNAP group). Using logistic regression, we modeled four forms of PP-CPS involvement: parent-perpetrator, resident parent non-perpetrator, nonresident parent non-perpetrator, and non-biological parent-perpetrator. Predicted risks of any PP-CPS involvement by age 25 were 10 % (SNAP group), 17–22 % (CPSV group), and 26–33 % (OHC group); among OHC youth known to have a biological child, rates exceeded 40 %. The proportion of CPS involvement that involved parent-perpetration varied substantially by sex and adversity type. Focusing only on intergenerational maltreatment in which the parents are the perpetrators may substantially understate the risk of maltreatment recurring across generations.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Adverse Childhood Experiences</subject><subject>Adversity</subject><subject>At risk populations</subject><subject>Child Abuse</subject><subject>Child Protective Services</subject><subject>Child Welfare</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food Assistance</subject><subject>Home health care</subject><subject>Homogamy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insight</subject><subject>Inter-generational</subject><subject>Intergenerational relationships</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maltreatment</subject><subject>Natural parents</subject><subject>Offending</subject><subject>Parenting</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Perpetrator</subject><subject>Perpetrators</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Victims</subject><subject>Wisconsin</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0145-2134</issn><issn>1873-7757</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1P3DAQtRAVLLT_oKoiceGSxY4_Yl-Q0IqPSkj0AGfLccbgVTZe7CQS_x5HC7RwqA_2yPPmzcx7CP0keEkwEWfrpX3yphmXFSYqf7GK1XtoQWRNy7rm9T5aYMJ4WRHKDtFRSmucD6_5ATqkpCacE7lAqz9mGCD2qQiu8H0OH6GHaAYfetMVuUXXFtsYBrCDn6BIECdvIWXsFLoJNtAP39E3Z7oEP97eY_RwdXm_uilv765_ry5uS8sUGcqWO66cIE4K2TiRL0Gk4EYxxzlVwjjXAFGVaizUCuOG5WxDbWuok4opeozOd7zbsdlAa3PraDq9jX5j4osOxuvPmd4_6ccwaaEkExJngtM3ghieR0iD3vhkoetMD2FMuqJkVlEwmaEnX6DrMMYsyYxiWTvF6DwR26FsDClFcB_DEKxnl_Ra71zSs0t651Iu-_XvIh9F77b83RSynJOHqJP10FtofcxG6Db4_3d4BQrwpi0</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Font, Sarah</creator><creator>Cancian, Maria</creator><creator>Berger, Lawrence M.</creator><creator>DiGiovanni, Anna</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4022-5517</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7913-1059</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Patterns of intergenerational child protective services involvement</title><author>Font, Sarah ; Cancian, Maria ; Berger, Lawrence M. ; DiGiovanni, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-d5f59f61f868bf668b61865a94f55396affbe1929bce7900b4865b3cda3f89493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Adverse Childhood Experiences</topic><topic>Adversity</topic><topic>At risk populations</topic><topic>Child Abuse</topic><topic>Child Protective Services</topic><topic>Child Welfare</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food Assistance</topic><topic>Home health care</topic><topic>Homogamy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insight</topic><topic>Inter-generational</topic><topic>Intergenerational relationships</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maltreatment</topic><topic>Natural parents</topic><topic>Offending</topic><topic>Parenting</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Perpetrator</topic><topic>Perpetrators</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Victims</topic><topic>Wisconsin</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Font, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cancian, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Lawrence M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiGiovanni, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Child abuse &amp; neglect</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Font, Sarah</au><au>Cancian, Maria</au><au>Berger, Lawrence M.</au><au>DiGiovanni, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patterns of intergenerational child protective services involvement</atitle><jtitle>Child abuse &amp; neglect</jtitle><addtitle>Child Abuse Negl</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>99</volume><spage>104247</spage><epage>104247</epage><pages>104247-104247</pages><artnum>104247</artnum><issn>0145-2134</issn><eissn>1873-7757</eissn><abstract>Prior research on Child Protective Services (CPS) involvement among at-risk youth focuses on their roles as parents perpetrating maltreatment against biological offspring. Given family complexity and assortative partnering, measuring all CPS involvement – as perpetrators and non-offending parents of victims – provides new insight into intergenerational maltreatment patterns. Our objective was to investigate the risk of multiple forms of parent or perpetrator CPS involvement (PP-CPS) by age 25, among those exposed to three forms of adversity in their late teens (at ages 14–17): alleged victim on a CPS investigation, out-of-home care (OHC), and poverty. We used a sample of 36,475 individuals born in 1990–1991 from the Wisconsin Data Core longitudinal administrative database, and tracked their involvement in CPS, OHC, and the food assistance program (SNAP) over time. Our sample consisted of individuals who, at ages 14–17, met one of the following criteria: were in OHC; had CPS involvement as a victim but no OHC (CPSV group), or received food assistance without CPSV or OHC (SNAP group). Using logistic regression, we modeled four forms of PP-CPS involvement: parent-perpetrator, resident parent non-perpetrator, nonresident parent non-perpetrator, and non-biological parent-perpetrator. Predicted risks of any PP-CPS involvement by age 25 were 10 % (SNAP group), 17–22 % (CPSV group), and 26–33 % (OHC group); among OHC youth known to have a biological child, rates exceeded 40 %. The proportion of CPS involvement that involved parent-perpetration varied substantially by sex and adversity type. Focusing only on intergenerational maltreatment in which the parents are the perpetrators may substantially understate the risk of maltreatment recurring across generations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31715518</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104247</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4022-5517</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7913-1059</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0145-2134
ispartof Child abuse & neglect, 2020-01, Vol.99, p.104247-104247, Article 104247
issn 0145-2134
1873-7757
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6984680
source MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adolescent
Adolescents
Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adversity
At risk populations
Child Abuse
Child Protective Services
Child Welfare
Children
Female
Food
Food Assistance
Home health care
Homogamy
Humans
Insight
Inter-generational
Intergenerational relationships
Logistic Models
Male
Maltreatment
Natural parents
Offending
Parenting
Parents
Parents & parenting
Participation
Perpetrator
Perpetrators
Poverty
Risk
Victims
Wisconsin
Young Adult
Youth
title Patterns of intergenerational child protective services involvement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A25%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns%20of%20intergenerational%20child%20protective%20services%20involvement&rft.jtitle=Child%20abuse%20&%20neglect&rft.au=Font,%20Sarah&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=99&rft.spage=104247&rft.epage=104247&rft.pages=104247-104247&rft.artnum=104247&rft.issn=0145-2134&rft.eissn=1873-7757&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104247&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2345519439%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2345519439&rft_id=info:pmid/31715518&rft_els_id=S0145213419304247&rfr_iscdi=true