Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy is being steadily adopted instead of two-dimensional (2D) for various procedures. Our aim was to compare the outcomes between 2D and 3D laparoscopic procedures for colorectal cancer in order to ascertain the safety, efficacy and potential advantages of 3D imaging s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:In vivo (Athens) 2020-01, Vol.34 (1), p.11-21
Hauptverfasser: Pantalos, George, Patsouras, Dimitrios, Spartalis, Eleftherios, Dimitroulis, Dimitrios, Tsourouflis, Gerasimos, Nikiteas, Nikolaos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Review
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11
container_title In vivo (Athens)
container_volume 34
creator Pantalos, George
Patsouras, Dimitrios
Spartalis, Eleftherios
Dimitroulis, Dimitrios
Tsourouflis, Gerasimos
Nikiteas, Nikolaos
description Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy is being steadily adopted instead of two-dimensional (2D) for various procedures. Our aim was to compare the outcomes between 2D and 3D laparoscopic procedures for colorectal cancer in order to ascertain the safety, efficacy and potential advantages of 3D imaging systems. A systematic database search was conducted in March 2019. Comparative studies reporting clinical outcomes between patients undergoing elective colorectal procedures using either 2D or 3D laparoscopic equipment were eligible. Six studies were selected, including 614 patients in total. Minor reduction in operative time, similar blood loss and increased number of harvested lymph nodes was noted for the 3D group. There was no difference for conversion to open surgery, time to flatus, postoperative hospital stay or postoperative complications. 3D Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer may result in reduction of operative time and higher lymph node yields, leading to improved survival.
doi_str_mv 10.21873/invivo.11740
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6984079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2331257114</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-3516003ffda2fc984859d41a51981f8181edc8a63d62b0a8878f5c6ed8b4c4193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUFv1DAQRi0EotvCkSvKkUuKJ47jCQcktAKKtBVSuyBu1qwzaY2SeLGTLfvvG7ptRU8jzTx9M5onxBuQpwWgUe_9sPO7cApgSvlMLMDUkBtd1s_FQhYac9Tw60gcp_RbyspIWbwURwoQi1LjQvxdX0fmvPE9D8mHgbrsJ8c0pWx9E560V7SlGJILW--yyylecdxnbYjZMnQhshtnZkmD4_ghu9ynkXsaZ_KCd55vMhqa7JxHymnO2iefXokXLXWJX9_XE_Hjy-f18ixfff_6bflplTuFZsyVhkpK1bYNFa2rsURdNyWQhhqhRUDgxiFVqqmKjSREg612FTe4KV0JtToRHw-522nTzywPY6TObqPvKe5tIG-fTgZ_ba_CzlbzMmn-Bby7D4jhz8RptL1PjruOBg5TsoVSUGgDUM5ofkDd_KgUuX1cA9Le2bIHW_bO1sy__f-2R_pBj7oFoNqVMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2331257114</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pantalos, George ; Patsouras, Dimitrios ; Spartalis, Eleftherios ; Dimitroulis, Dimitrios ; Tsourouflis, Gerasimos ; Nikiteas, Nikolaos</creator><creatorcontrib>Pantalos, George ; Patsouras, Dimitrios ; Spartalis, Eleftherios ; Dimitroulis, Dimitrios ; Tsourouflis, Gerasimos ; Nikiteas, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><description>Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy is being steadily adopted instead of two-dimensional (2D) for various procedures. Our aim was to compare the outcomes between 2D and 3D laparoscopic procedures for colorectal cancer in order to ascertain the safety, efficacy and potential advantages of 3D imaging systems. A systematic database search was conducted in March 2019. Comparative studies reporting clinical outcomes between patients undergoing elective colorectal procedures using either 2D or 3D laparoscopic equipment were eligible. Six studies were selected, including 614 patients in total. Minor reduction in operative time, similar blood loss and increased number of harvested lymph nodes was noted for the 3D group. There was no difference for conversion to open surgery, time to flatus, postoperative hospital stay or postoperative complications. 3D Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer may result in reduction of operative time and higher lymph node yields, leading to improved survival.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0258-851X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1791-7549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11740</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31882458</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Greece: International Institute of Anticancer Research</publisher><subject>Review</subject><ispartof>In vivo (Athens), 2020-01, Vol.34 (1), p.11-21</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-3516003ffda2fc984859d41a51981f8181edc8a63d62b0a8878f5c6ed8b4c4193</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6984079/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6984079/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27915,27916,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31882458$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pantalos, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patsouras, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spartalis, Eleftherios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimitroulis, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsourouflis, Gerasimos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikiteas, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><title>Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><title>In vivo (Athens)</title><addtitle>In Vivo</addtitle><description>Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy is being steadily adopted instead of two-dimensional (2D) for various procedures. Our aim was to compare the outcomes between 2D and 3D laparoscopic procedures for colorectal cancer in order to ascertain the safety, efficacy and potential advantages of 3D imaging systems. A systematic database search was conducted in March 2019. Comparative studies reporting clinical outcomes between patients undergoing elective colorectal procedures using either 2D or 3D laparoscopic equipment were eligible. Six studies were selected, including 614 patients in total. Minor reduction in operative time, similar blood loss and increased number of harvested lymph nodes was noted for the 3D group. There was no difference for conversion to open surgery, time to flatus, postoperative hospital stay or postoperative complications. 3D Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer may result in reduction of operative time and higher lymph node yields, leading to improved survival.</description><subject>Review</subject><issn>0258-851X</issn><issn>1791-7549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUFv1DAQRi0EotvCkSvKkUuKJ47jCQcktAKKtBVSuyBu1qwzaY2SeLGTLfvvG7ptRU8jzTx9M5onxBuQpwWgUe_9sPO7cApgSvlMLMDUkBtd1s_FQhYac9Tw60gcp_RbyspIWbwURwoQi1LjQvxdX0fmvPE9D8mHgbrsJ8c0pWx9E560V7SlGJILW--yyylecdxnbYjZMnQhshtnZkmD4_ghu9ynkXsaZ_KCd55vMhqa7JxHymnO2iefXokXLXWJX9_XE_Hjy-f18ixfff_6bflplTuFZsyVhkpK1bYNFa2rsURdNyWQhhqhRUDgxiFVqqmKjSREg612FTe4KV0JtToRHw-522nTzywPY6TObqPvKe5tIG-fTgZ_ba_CzlbzMmn-Bby7D4jhz8RptL1PjruOBg5TsoVSUGgDUM5ofkDd_KgUuX1cA9Le2bIHW_bO1sy__f-2R_pBj7oFoNqVMg</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Pantalos, George</creator><creator>Patsouras, Dimitrios</creator><creator>Spartalis, Eleftherios</creator><creator>Dimitroulis, Dimitrios</creator><creator>Tsourouflis, Gerasimos</creator><creator>Nikiteas, Nikolaos</creator><general>International Institute of Anticancer Research</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><author>Pantalos, George ; Patsouras, Dimitrios ; Spartalis, Eleftherios ; Dimitroulis, Dimitrios ; Tsourouflis, Gerasimos ; Nikiteas, Nikolaos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-3516003ffda2fc984859d41a51981f8181edc8a63d62b0a8878f5c6ed8b4c4193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pantalos, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patsouras, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spartalis, Eleftherios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimitroulis, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsourouflis, Gerasimos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikiteas, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>In vivo (Athens)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pantalos, George</au><au>Patsouras, Dimitrios</au><au>Spartalis, Eleftherios</au><au>Dimitroulis, Dimitrios</au><au>Tsourouflis, Gerasimos</au><au>Nikiteas, Nikolaos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>In vivo (Athens)</jtitle><addtitle>In Vivo</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>11-21</pages><issn>0258-851X</issn><eissn>1791-7549</eissn><abstract>Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy is being steadily adopted instead of two-dimensional (2D) for various procedures. Our aim was to compare the outcomes between 2D and 3D laparoscopic procedures for colorectal cancer in order to ascertain the safety, efficacy and potential advantages of 3D imaging systems. A systematic database search was conducted in March 2019. Comparative studies reporting clinical outcomes between patients undergoing elective colorectal procedures using either 2D or 3D laparoscopic equipment were eligible. Six studies were selected, including 614 patients in total. Minor reduction in operative time, similar blood loss and increased number of harvested lymph nodes was noted for the 3D group. There was no difference for conversion to open surgery, time to flatus, postoperative hospital stay or postoperative complications. 3D Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer may result in reduction of operative time and higher lymph node yields, leading to improved survival.</abstract><cop>Greece</cop><pub>International Institute of Anticancer Research</pub><pmid>31882458</pmid><doi>10.21873/invivo.11740</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0258-851X
ispartof In vivo (Athens), 2020-01, Vol.34 (1), p.11-21
issn 0258-851X
1791-7549
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6984079
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Review
title Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A45%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three-dimensional%20Versus%20Two-dimensional%20Laparoscopic%20Surgery%20for%20Colorectal%20Cancer:%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=In%20vivo%20(Athens)&rft.au=Pantalos,%20George&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=11-21&rft.issn=0258-851X&rft.eissn=1791-7549&rft_id=info:doi/10.21873/invivo.11740&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2331257114%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2331257114&rft_id=info:pmid/31882458&rfr_iscdi=true