Contemporary prostate cancer treatment choices in multidisciplinary clinics referenced to national trends

Background The purpose of this study was to assess treatment choices among men with prostate cancer who presented at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center multidisciplinary (MultiD) clinic compared with nationwide trends. Methods In total, 4451 men with prostate cancer who presented at t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2020-02, Vol.126 (3), p.506-514
Hauptverfasser: Tang, Chad, Hoffman, Karen E., Allen, Pamela K., Gabel, Molly, Schreiber, David, Choi, Seungtaek, Chapin, Brian F., Nguyen, Quynh‐Nhu, Davis, John W., Corn, Paul, Logothetis, Christopher, Ward, John, Frank, Steven J., Navai, Neema, McGuire, Sean E., Anscher, Mitchell, Pisters, Louis, Pettaway, Curtis A., Kumar, Rachit, Linson, Patrick, Tripuraneni, Prabhakar, Tomaszewski, Jeffrey J., Patel, Ashish B., Augspurger, Mark, Kuban, Deborah A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 514
container_issue 3
container_start_page 506
container_title Cancer
container_volume 126
creator Tang, Chad
Hoffman, Karen E.
Allen, Pamela K.
Gabel, Molly
Schreiber, David
Choi, Seungtaek
Chapin, Brian F.
Nguyen, Quynh‐Nhu
Davis, John W.
Corn, Paul
Logothetis, Christopher
Ward, John
Frank, Steven J.
Navai, Neema
McGuire, Sean E.
Anscher, Mitchell
Pisters, Louis
Pettaway, Curtis A.
Kumar, Rachit
Linson, Patrick
Tripuraneni, Prabhakar
Tomaszewski, Jeffrey J.
Patel, Ashish B.
Augspurger, Mark
Kuban, Deborah A.
description Background The purpose of this study was to assess treatment choices among men with prostate cancer who presented at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center multidisciplinary (MultiD) clinic compared with nationwide trends. Methods In total, 4451 men with prostate cancer who presented at the MultiD clinic from 2004 to 2016 were analyzed. To assess nationwide trends, the authors analyzed 392,710 men with prostate cancer who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary endpoint was treatment choice as a function of pretreatment demographics. Results Univariate analyses revealed similar treatment trends in the MultiD and SEER cohorts. The use of procedural forms of definitive therapy decreased with age, including brachytherapy and prostatectomy (all P 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.32570
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6980273</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2338985200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4480-c940497ed6f6c2fbe79fa54e62fd2b95095701e990fb2cd261dd2c1f72168ea93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFrFTEUhYMo9lnd-AMk4E6YepPJTCYbQYZqhaJQKrgLeckdmzKTjEmepf_ePF9b6sbVJeS7J-fkEPKawQkD4O9tsOmk5Z2EJ2TDQMkGmOBPyQYAhqYT7Y8j8iLn63qUvGufk6OWScF7KTbEjzEUXNaYTLqla4q5mILUmmAx0ZLQlAVDofYqeouZ-kCX3Vy889n6dfZhv2br9DbThBMmrJuOlkiDKT4GM-9VgssvybPJzBlf3c1j8v3T6eV41px_-_xl_HjeWCEGaKwSIJRE10-95dMWpZpMJ7Dnk-Nb1YGqORkqBdOWW8d75hy3bJKc9QMa1R6TDwfddbdd0NnqPplZr8kv1auOxut_b4K_0j_jb92rAbhsq8DbO4EUf-0wF30dd6kGyZq37aCGjgNU6t2BsvXPck3-8AIDva9F72vRf2up8JvHnh7Q-x4qwA7AjZ_x9j9Sevw6XhxE_wDBtZvU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2338985200</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contemporary prostate cancer treatment choices in multidisciplinary clinics referenced to national trends</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tang, Chad ; Hoffman, Karen E. ; Allen, Pamela K. ; Gabel, Molly ; Schreiber, David ; Choi, Seungtaek ; Chapin, Brian F. ; Nguyen, Quynh‐Nhu ; Davis, John W. ; Corn, Paul ; Logothetis, Christopher ; Ward, John ; Frank, Steven J. ; Navai, Neema ; McGuire, Sean E. ; Anscher, Mitchell ; Pisters, Louis ; Pettaway, Curtis A. ; Kumar, Rachit ; Linson, Patrick ; Tripuraneni, Prabhakar ; Tomaszewski, Jeffrey J. ; Patel, Ashish B. ; Augspurger, Mark ; Kuban, Deborah A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chad ; Hoffman, Karen E. ; Allen, Pamela K. ; Gabel, Molly ; Schreiber, David ; Choi, Seungtaek ; Chapin, Brian F. ; Nguyen, Quynh‐Nhu ; Davis, John W. ; Corn, Paul ; Logothetis, Christopher ; Ward, John ; Frank, Steven J. ; Navai, Neema ; McGuire, Sean E. ; Anscher, Mitchell ; Pisters, Louis ; Pettaway, Curtis A. ; Kumar, Rachit ; Linson, Patrick ; Tripuraneni, Prabhakar ; Tomaszewski, Jeffrey J. ; Patel, Ashish B. ; Augspurger, Mark ; Kuban, Deborah A.</creatorcontrib><description>Background The purpose of this study was to assess treatment choices among men with prostate cancer who presented at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center multidisciplinary (MultiD) clinic compared with nationwide trends. Methods In total, 4451 men with prostate cancer who presented at the MultiD clinic from 2004 to 2016 were analyzed. To assess nationwide trends, the authors analyzed 392,710 men with prostate cancer who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary endpoint was treatment choice as a function of pretreatment demographics. Results Univariate analyses revealed similar treatment trends in the MultiD and SEER cohorts. The use of procedural forms of definitive therapy decreased with age, including brachytherapy and prostatectomy (all P &lt; .05). Later year of diagnosis/clinic visit was associated with decreased use of definitive treatments, whereas higher risk grouping was associated with increased use (all P &lt; .001). Patients with low‐risk disease treated at the MultiD clinic were more likely to receive nondefinitive therapy than patients in SEER, whereas the opposite trend was observed for patients with high‐risk disease, with a substantial portion of high‐risk patients in SEER not receiving definitive therapy. In the MultiD clinic, African American men with intermediate‐risk and high‐risk disease were more likely to receive definitive therapy than white men, but for SEER the opposite was true. Conclusions Presentation at a MultiD clinic facilitates the appropriate disposition of patients with low‐risk disease to nondefinitive strategies of patients with high‐risk disease to definitive treatment, and it may obviate the influence of race. Presentation at a multidisciplinary clinic facilitates the appropriate disposition of low‐risk patients into nondefinitive strategies and of high‐risk patients into definitive treatment, and it may obviate the confounding influence of race. By comparison, nationwide, the disposition of patients may be confounded by pretreatment demographic factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32570</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31742674</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>African Americans ; Aged ; and End Results (SEER) ; Brachytherapy ; Brachytherapy - trends ; Cancer surgery ; Cancer therapies ; Demographics ; Demography ; Epidemiology ; European Continental Ancestry Group ; Health risks ; Humans ; Male ; Medical treatment ; Middle Aged ; multidisciplinary clinic ; Oncology ; Patient Selection ; Prostate cancer ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatectomy - trends ; Prostatic Neoplasms - blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy ; Radiation therapy ; Risk ; SEER Program ; Surveillance ; treatment access ; Trends ; United States - epidemiology ; Urological surgery</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2020-02, Vol.126 (3), p.506-514</ispartof><rights>2019 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2019 American Cancer Society.</rights><rights>2020 American Cancer Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4480-c940497ed6f6c2fbe79fa54e62fd2b95095701e990fb2cd261dd2c1f72168ea93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4480-c940497ed6f6c2fbe79fa54e62fd2b95095701e990fb2cd261dd2c1f72168ea93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5915-1327</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.32570$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.32570$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,1432,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31742674$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Karen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Pamela K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabel, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Seungtaek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapin, Brian F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Quynh‐Nhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corn, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logothetis, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navai, Neema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Sean E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anscher, Mitchell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisters, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettaway, Curtis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Rachit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linson, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripuraneni, Prabhakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomaszewski, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Ashish B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augspurger, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuban, Deborah A.</creatorcontrib><title>Contemporary prostate cancer treatment choices in multidisciplinary clinics referenced to national trends</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background The purpose of this study was to assess treatment choices among men with prostate cancer who presented at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center multidisciplinary (MultiD) clinic compared with nationwide trends. Methods In total, 4451 men with prostate cancer who presented at the MultiD clinic from 2004 to 2016 were analyzed. To assess nationwide trends, the authors analyzed 392,710 men with prostate cancer who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary endpoint was treatment choice as a function of pretreatment demographics. Results Univariate analyses revealed similar treatment trends in the MultiD and SEER cohorts. The use of procedural forms of definitive therapy decreased with age, including brachytherapy and prostatectomy (all P &lt; .05). Later year of diagnosis/clinic visit was associated with decreased use of definitive treatments, whereas higher risk grouping was associated with increased use (all P &lt; .001). Patients with low‐risk disease treated at the MultiD clinic were more likely to receive nondefinitive therapy than patients in SEER, whereas the opposite trend was observed for patients with high‐risk disease, with a substantial portion of high‐risk patients in SEER not receiving definitive therapy. In the MultiD clinic, African American men with intermediate‐risk and high‐risk disease were more likely to receive definitive therapy than white men, but for SEER the opposite was true. Conclusions Presentation at a MultiD clinic facilitates the appropriate disposition of patients with low‐risk disease to nondefinitive strategies of patients with high‐risk disease to definitive treatment, and it may obviate the influence of race. Presentation at a multidisciplinary clinic facilitates the appropriate disposition of low‐risk patients into nondefinitive strategies and of high‐risk patients into definitive treatment, and it may obviate the confounding influence of race. By comparison, nationwide, the disposition of patients may be confounded by pretreatment demographic factors.</description><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>and End Results (SEER)</subject><subject>Brachytherapy</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - trends</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>European Continental Ancestry Group</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>multidisciplinary clinic</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - trends</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>SEER Program</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>treatment access</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFrFTEUhYMo9lnd-AMk4E6YepPJTCYbQYZqhaJQKrgLeckdmzKTjEmepf_ePF9b6sbVJeS7J-fkEPKawQkD4O9tsOmk5Z2EJ2TDQMkGmOBPyQYAhqYT7Y8j8iLn63qUvGufk6OWScF7KTbEjzEUXNaYTLqla4q5mILUmmAx0ZLQlAVDofYqeouZ-kCX3Vy889n6dfZhv2br9DbThBMmrJuOlkiDKT4GM-9VgssvybPJzBlf3c1j8v3T6eV41px_-_xl_HjeWCEGaKwSIJRE10-95dMWpZpMJ7Dnk-Nb1YGqORkqBdOWW8d75hy3bJKc9QMa1R6TDwfddbdd0NnqPplZr8kv1auOxut_b4K_0j_jb92rAbhsq8DbO4EUf-0wF30dd6kGyZq37aCGjgNU6t2BsvXPck3-8AIDva9F72vRf2up8JvHnh7Q-x4qwA7AjZ_x9j9Sevw6XhxE_wDBtZvU</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Tang, Chad</creator><creator>Hoffman, Karen E.</creator><creator>Allen, Pamela K.</creator><creator>Gabel, Molly</creator><creator>Schreiber, David</creator><creator>Choi, Seungtaek</creator><creator>Chapin, Brian F.</creator><creator>Nguyen, Quynh‐Nhu</creator><creator>Davis, John W.</creator><creator>Corn, Paul</creator><creator>Logothetis, Christopher</creator><creator>Ward, John</creator><creator>Frank, Steven J.</creator><creator>Navai, Neema</creator><creator>McGuire, Sean E.</creator><creator>Anscher, Mitchell</creator><creator>Pisters, Louis</creator><creator>Pettaway, Curtis A.</creator><creator>Kumar, Rachit</creator><creator>Linson, Patrick</creator><creator>Tripuraneni, Prabhakar</creator><creator>Tomaszewski, Jeffrey J.</creator><creator>Patel, Ashish B.</creator><creator>Augspurger, Mark</creator><creator>Kuban, Deborah A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-1327</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Contemporary prostate cancer treatment choices in multidisciplinary clinics referenced to national trends</title><author>Tang, Chad ; Hoffman, Karen E. ; Allen, Pamela K. ; Gabel, Molly ; Schreiber, David ; Choi, Seungtaek ; Chapin, Brian F. ; Nguyen, Quynh‐Nhu ; Davis, John W. ; Corn, Paul ; Logothetis, Christopher ; Ward, John ; Frank, Steven J. ; Navai, Neema ; McGuire, Sean E. ; Anscher, Mitchell ; Pisters, Louis ; Pettaway, Curtis A. ; Kumar, Rachit ; Linson, Patrick ; Tripuraneni, Prabhakar ; Tomaszewski, Jeffrey J. ; Patel, Ashish B. ; Augspurger, Mark ; Kuban, Deborah A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4480-c940497ed6f6c2fbe79fa54e62fd2b95095701e990fb2cd261dd2c1f72168ea93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>and End Results (SEER)</topic><topic>Brachytherapy</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - trends</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>European Continental Ancestry Group</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>multidisciplinary clinic</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - trends</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>SEER Program</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>treatment access</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Karen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Pamela K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabel, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Seungtaek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapin, Brian F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Quynh‐Nhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corn, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logothetis, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navai, Neema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Sean E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anscher, Mitchell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisters, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettaway, Curtis A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Rachit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linson, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripuraneni, Prabhakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomaszewski, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Ashish B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augspurger, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuban, Deborah A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tang, Chad</au><au>Hoffman, Karen E.</au><au>Allen, Pamela K.</au><au>Gabel, Molly</au><au>Schreiber, David</au><au>Choi, Seungtaek</au><au>Chapin, Brian F.</au><au>Nguyen, Quynh‐Nhu</au><au>Davis, John W.</au><au>Corn, Paul</au><au>Logothetis, Christopher</au><au>Ward, John</au><au>Frank, Steven J.</au><au>Navai, Neema</au><au>McGuire, Sean E.</au><au>Anscher, Mitchell</au><au>Pisters, Louis</au><au>Pettaway, Curtis A.</au><au>Kumar, Rachit</au><au>Linson, Patrick</au><au>Tripuraneni, Prabhakar</au><au>Tomaszewski, Jeffrey J.</au><au>Patel, Ashish B.</au><au>Augspurger, Mark</au><au>Kuban, Deborah A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contemporary prostate cancer treatment choices in multidisciplinary clinics referenced to national trends</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>506</spage><epage>514</epage><pages>506-514</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background The purpose of this study was to assess treatment choices among men with prostate cancer who presented at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center multidisciplinary (MultiD) clinic compared with nationwide trends. Methods In total, 4451 men with prostate cancer who presented at the MultiD clinic from 2004 to 2016 were analyzed. To assess nationwide trends, the authors analyzed 392,710 men with prostate cancer who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary endpoint was treatment choice as a function of pretreatment demographics. Results Univariate analyses revealed similar treatment trends in the MultiD and SEER cohorts. The use of procedural forms of definitive therapy decreased with age, including brachytherapy and prostatectomy (all P &lt; .05). Later year of diagnosis/clinic visit was associated with decreased use of definitive treatments, whereas higher risk grouping was associated with increased use (all P &lt; .001). Patients with low‐risk disease treated at the MultiD clinic were more likely to receive nondefinitive therapy than patients in SEER, whereas the opposite trend was observed for patients with high‐risk disease, with a substantial portion of high‐risk patients in SEER not receiving definitive therapy. In the MultiD clinic, African American men with intermediate‐risk and high‐risk disease were more likely to receive definitive therapy than white men, but for SEER the opposite was true. Conclusions Presentation at a MultiD clinic facilitates the appropriate disposition of patients with low‐risk disease to nondefinitive strategies of patients with high‐risk disease to definitive treatment, and it may obviate the influence of race. Presentation at a multidisciplinary clinic facilitates the appropriate disposition of low‐risk patients into nondefinitive strategies and of high‐risk patients into definitive treatment, and it may obviate the confounding influence of race. By comparison, nationwide, the disposition of patients may be confounded by pretreatment demographic factors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31742674</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.32570</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-1327</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2020-02, Vol.126 (3), p.506-514
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6980273
source MEDLINE; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects African Americans
Aged
and End Results (SEER)
Brachytherapy
Brachytherapy - trends
Cancer surgery
Cancer therapies
Demographics
Demography
Epidemiology
European Continental Ancestry Group
Health risks
Humans
Male
Medical treatment
Middle Aged
multidisciplinary clinic
Oncology
Patient Selection
Prostate cancer
Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood
Prostatectomy
Prostatectomy - trends
Prostatic Neoplasms - blood
Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology
Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy
Radiation therapy
Risk
SEER Program
Surveillance
treatment access
Trends
United States - epidemiology
Urological surgery
title Contemporary prostate cancer treatment choices in multidisciplinary clinics referenced to national trends
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T07%3A46%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contemporary%20prostate%20cancer%20treatment%20choices%20in%20multidisciplinary%20clinics%20referenced%20to%20national%20trends&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Tang,%20Chad&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=506&rft.epage=514&rft.pages=506-514&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.32570&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2338985200%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2338985200&rft_id=info:pmid/31742674&rfr_iscdi=true