The Impact of Switching to Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Women

Background: We noted a marked increase in Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections in the Capital Health Region of NS coincident with substitution of a PCR for an enzyme immunoassay (EIA). We reviewed our experience to determine the cost of switching and the impact on the number of new infections diagn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of public health 2003-05, Vol.94 (3), p.229-232
1. Verfasser: Forward, Kevin R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 232
container_issue 3
container_start_page 229
container_title Canadian journal of public health
container_volume 94
creator Forward, Kevin R.
description Background: We noted a marked increase in Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections in the Capital Health Region of NS coincident with substitution of a PCR for an enzyme immunoassay (EIA). We reviewed our experience to determine the cost of switching and the impact on the number of new infections diagnosed. Methods: Information on the number of EIA and PCR tests performed on women was retrieved from an abstracted laboratory information database. We examined records of testing performed between April 1998 and December 2001. Prior to June 2001, all genital swabs were tested using the MicroTrak, II Chlamydia EIA and confirmed by direct fluorescence examination. After July 2001, genital swabs were tested using the COBAS AMPLICOR® C. trachomatis test. Results: During the study period, 62,288 EIA tests were performed on specimens submitted; 2,061 (3.33%) were positive. In the six months when testing was performed by the PCR method, 9,559 PCR tests were performed, 463 (4.84%) were positive; 46% increase. In the three years before PCR testing was implemented, an average of 1,626 specimens were submitted monthly. An average of 54 tests were positive (3.3%). The cost for each positive detected by PCR was $208 Cdn and $226 by EIA. Conclusions: The switch to PCR for the diagnosis of CT produced a marked increase in the number of chlamydia infections diagnosed. The recent increase in the number of reported CT cases in Canada may be due in large part to more sensitive tests. Surprisingly, the cost of each positive test by PCR was $18 Cdn less than that of the EIA. Contexte : Il y a eu une augmentation marquée des infections à Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) dans la région sanitaire de la capitale de la Nouvelle-Écosse, qui coïncidait avec l'utilisation de l'amplification par la polymerase (PCR) en remplacement des essais immunoenzymatiques (EIA). Nous avons fait le bilan de l'expérience afin de déterminer le coût du changement et ses incidences sur le nombre de nouveaux cas d'infection diagnostiqués. Méthode : Les données sur le nombre d'essais EIA et PCR effectués sur des femmes proviennent d'une base de données de laboratoire résumées. Nous avons examiné les dossiers des essais effectués entre avril 1998 et décembre 2001. Avant juin 2001, tous les prélèvements génitaux étaient testés par EIA (MicroTrak II Chlamydia) et confirmés au moyen d'un examen direct par fluorescence. Après juillet 2001, les prélèvements génitaux ont subi le test de dépistage de la C. trachomatis COBAS
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF03405072
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6979981</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41993648</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41993648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1e9bb457de522c685e656ac3879deb9a78b8a6a258d921c1ba7208cfab6b44963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc-LEzEcxYMobnf14l0JwnoQqvkxkx8XQaurhQVFVzyG72QynZSZpJtMlf73prZs1VMI7_MeL3kIPaHkFSVEvn53RXhFaiLZPTSjmpG5rKS4j2aEEDWvmOBn6DzndblyLvlDdEaZ1MVAZijf9A4vxw3YCccOf_vlJ9v7sMJTxF_isBtdguzwogcf8FdXMB8D7mLCUzG-97AKMfu89y76AcZd6wFPCWwfR5iKsAyd-2PKuCT8iKMLj9CDDobsHh_PC_T96sPN4tP8-vPH5eLt9dxWNZ_m1OmmqWrZupoxK1TtRC3AciV16xoNUjUKBLBatZpRSxuQjCjbQSOaqtKCX6A3h9zNthlda10oxQazSX6EtDMRvPlXCb43q_jTCC21VrQEvDgGpHi7dXkyo8_WDQMEF7fZSM4FUVoX8Pl_4DpuUyiPM4wRKjkRqkAvD5BNMefkursmlJj9kOY0ZIGf_d39hB6XK8DlEYBsYegSBOvziauULOj-E54euHWeYrrTK1pqi0rx304Cr-8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220173068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Switching to Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Women</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Forward, Kevin R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Forward, Kevin R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: We noted a marked increase in Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections in the Capital Health Region of NS coincident with substitution of a PCR for an enzyme immunoassay (EIA). We reviewed our experience to determine the cost of switching and the impact on the number of new infections diagnosed. Methods: Information on the number of EIA and PCR tests performed on women was retrieved from an abstracted laboratory information database. We examined records of testing performed between April 1998 and December 2001. Prior to June 2001, all genital swabs were tested using the MicroTrak, II Chlamydia EIA and confirmed by direct fluorescence examination. After July 2001, genital swabs were tested using the COBAS AMPLICOR® C. trachomatis test. Results: During the study period, 62,288 EIA tests were performed on specimens submitted; 2,061 (3.33%) were positive. In the six months when testing was performed by the PCR method, 9,559 PCR tests were performed, 463 (4.84%) were positive; 46% increase. In the three years before PCR testing was implemented, an average of 1,626 specimens were submitted monthly. An average of 54 tests were positive (3.3%). The cost for each positive detected by PCR was $208 Cdn and $226 by EIA. Conclusions: The switch to PCR for the diagnosis of CT produced a marked increase in the number of chlamydia infections diagnosed. The recent increase in the number of reported CT cases in Canada may be due in large part to more sensitive tests. Surprisingly, the cost of each positive test by PCR was $18 Cdn less than that of the EIA. Contexte : Il y a eu une augmentation marquée des infections à Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) dans la région sanitaire de la capitale de la Nouvelle-Écosse, qui coïncidait avec l'utilisation de l'amplification par la polymerase (PCR) en remplacement des essais immunoenzymatiques (EIA). Nous avons fait le bilan de l'expérience afin de déterminer le coût du changement et ses incidences sur le nombre de nouveaux cas d'infection diagnostiqués. Méthode : Les données sur le nombre d'essais EIA et PCR effectués sur des femmes proviennent d'une base de données de laboratoire résumées. Nous avons examiné les dossiers des essais effectués entre avril 1998 et décembre 2001. Avant juin 2001, tous les prélèvements génitaux étaient testés par EIA (MicroTrak II Chlamydia) et confirmés au moyen d'un examen direct par fluorescence. Après juillet 2001, les prélèvements génitaux ont subi le test de dépistage de la C. trachomatis COBAS AMPLICOR®. Résultats : Durant la période à l'étude, 62 288 EIA ont été effectués sur les prélèvements soumis; 2 061 (3,33 %) étaient positifs. Au cours des six mois où l'on a eu recours à la méthode PCR, 9 559 essais ont été effectués, dont 463 (4,84 %) étaient positifs, soit une hausse de 46 %. Les trois années précédant la mise en œuvre des essais PCR, on soumettait en moyenne 1 626 prélèvements par mois, et 54 essais en moyenne étaient positifs (3,3 %). Le coût unitaire des essais PCR positifs était de 208 $CAN (contre 226 $ pour les EIA positifs). Conclusions : L'adoption de la méthode PCR pour le diagnostic de la CT a entraîné une hausse marquée du nombre d'infections à Chlamydia diagnostiquées. La hausse récente du nombre de cas de CT signalés au Canada pourrait s'expliquer en grande partie par la sensibilité accrue des tests. Curieusement, le coût unitaire des essais PCR positifs était inférieur de 18 $CAN à celui des EIA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1920-7476</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03405072</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12790500</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJPEA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa, ON: Canadian Public Health Association</publisher><subject>Bacterial diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chlamydia ; Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis ; Chlamydia trachomatis ; Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation &amp; purification ; Cost estimates ; Costs ; Diagnostic tests ; Effectiveness ; Female ; Genitalia ; Health sciences ; Hospitals ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Immunoenzyme Techniques - economics ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Laboratory procedures ; Medical sciences ; Microbiology ; Miscellaneous ; Nova Scotia ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Polymerase Chain Reaction - economics ; Product category rules ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; Specimens ; STD ; Testing ; Urine ; Women</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of public health, 2003-05, Vol.94 (3), p.229-232</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Public Health Association May/Jun 2003</rights><rights>The Canadian Public Health Association 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1e9bb457de522c685e656ac3879deb9a78b8a6a258d921c1ba7208cfab6b44963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1e9bb457de522c685e656ac3879deb9a78b8a6a258d921c1ba7208cfab6b44963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41993648$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41993648$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27903,27904,53769,53771,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14872796$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12790500$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forward, Kevin R.</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Switching to Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Women</title><title>Canadian journal of public health</title><addtitle>Can J Public Health</addtitle><description>Background: We noted a marked increase in Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections in the Capital Health Region of NS coincident with substitution of a PCR for an enzyme immunoassay (EIA). We reviewed our experience to determine the cost of switching and the impact on the number of new infections diagnosed. Methods: Information on the number of EIA and PCR tests performed on women was retrieved from an abstracted laboratory information database. We examined records of testing performed between April 1998 and December 2001. Prior to June 2001, all genital swabs were tested using the MicroTrak, II Chlamydia EIA and confirmed by direct fluorescence examination. After July 2001, genital swabs were tested using the COBAS AMPLICOR® C. trachomatis test. Results: During the study period, 62,288 EIA tests were performed on specimens submitted; 2,061 (3.33%) were positive. In the six months when testing was performed by the PCR method, 9,559 PCR tests were performed, 463 (4.84%) were positive; 46% increase. In the three years before PCR testing was implemented, an average of 1,626 specimens were submitted monthly. An average of 54 tests were positive (3.3%). The cost for each positive detected by PCR was $208 Cdn and $226 by EIA. Conclusions: The switch to PCR for the diagnosis of CT produced a marked increase in the number of chlamydia infections diagnosed. The recent increase in the number of reported CT cases in Canada may be due in large part to more sensitive tests. Surprisingly, the cost of each positive test by PCR was $18 Cdn less than that of the EIA. Contexte : Il y a eu une augmentation marquée des infections à Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) dans la région sanitaire de la capitale de la Nouvelle-Écosse, qui coïncidait avec l'utilisation de l'amplification par la polymerase (PCR) en remplacement des essais immunoenzymatiques (EIA). Nous avons fait le bilan de l'expérience afin de déterminer le coût du changement et ses incidences sur le nombre de nouveaux cas d'infection diagnostiqués. Méthode : Les données sur le nombre d'essais EIA et PCR effectués sur des femmes proviennent d'une base de données de laboratoire résumées. Nous avons examiné les dossiers des essais effectués entre avril 1998 et décembre 2001. Avant juin 2001, tous les prélèvements génitaux étaient testés par EIA (MicroTrak II Chlamydia) et confirmés au moyen d'un examen direct par fluorescence. Après juillet 2001, les prélèvements génitaux ont subi le test de dépistage de la C. trachomatis COBAS AMPLICOR®. Résultats : Durant la période à l'étude, 62 288 EIA ont été effectués sur les prélèvements soumis; 2 061 (3,33 %) étaient positifs. Au cours des six mois où l'on a eu recours à la méthode PCR, 9 559 essais ont été effectués, dont 463 (4,84 %) étaient positifs, soit une hausse de 46 %. Les trois années précédant la mise en œuvre des essais PCR, on soumettait en moyenne 1 626 prélèvements par mois, et 54 essais en moyenne étaient positifs (3,3 %). Le coût unitaire des essais PCR positifs était de 208 $CAN (contre 226 $ pour les EIA positifs). Conclusions : L'adoption de la méthode PCR pour le diagnostic de la CT a entraîné une hausse marquée du nombre d'infections à Chlamydia diagnostiquées. La hausse récente du nombre de cas de CT signalés au Canada pourrait s'expliquer en grande partie par la sensibilité accrue des tests. Curieusement, le coût unitaire des essais PCR positifs était inférieur de 18 $CAN à celui des EIA.</description><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chlamydia</subject><subject>Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Chlamydia trachomatis</subject><subject>Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genitalia</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoenzyme Techniques - economics</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Laboratory procedures</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Nova Scotia</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction - economics</subject><subject>Product category rules</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>Specimens</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0008-4263</issn><issn>1920-7476</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc-LEzEcxYMobnf14l0JwnoQqvkxkx8XQaurhQVFVzyG72QynZSZpJtMlf73prZs1VMI7_MeL3kIPaHkFSVEvn53RXhFaiLZPTSjmpG5rKS4j2aEEDWvmOBn6DzndblyLvlDdEaZ1MVAZijf9A4vxw3YCccOf_vlJ9v7sMJTxF_isBtdguzwogcf8FdXMB8D7mLCUzG-97AKMfu89y76AcZd6wFPCWwfR5iKsAyd-2PKuCT8iKMLj9CDDobsHh_PC_T96sPN4tP8-vPH5eLt9dxWNZ_m1OmmqWrZupoxK1TtRC3AciV16xoNUjUKBLBatZpRSxuQjCjbQSOaqtKCX6A3h9zNthlda10oxQazSX6EtDMRvPlXCb43q_jTCC21VrQEvDgGpHi7dXkyo8_WDQMEF7fZSM4FUVoX8Pl_4DpuUyiPM4wRKjkRqkAvD5BNMefkursmlJj9kOY0ZIGf_d39hB6XK8DlEYBsYegSBOvziauULOj-E54euHWeYrrTK1pqi0rx304Cr-8</recordid><startdate>20030501</startdate><enddate>20030501</enddate><creator>Forward, Kevin R.</creator><general>Canadian Public Health Association</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030501</creationdate><title>The Impact of Switching to Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Women</title><author>Forward, Kevin R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1e9bb457de522c685e656ac3879deb9a78b8a6a258d921c1ba7208cfab6b44963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chlamydia</topic><topic>Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Chlamydia trachomatis</topic><topic>Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genitalia</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoenzyme Techniques - economics</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Laboratory procedures</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Nova Scotia</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction - economics</topic><topic>Product category rules</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>Specimens</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forward, Kevin R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forward, Kevin R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Switching to Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Women</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of public health</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Public Health</addtitle><date>2003-05-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>229-232</pages><issn>0008-4263</issn><eissn>1920-7476</eissn><coden>CJPEA4</coden><abstract>Background: We noted a marked increase in Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infections in the Capital Health Region of NS coincident with substitution of a PCR for an enzyme immunoassay (EIA). We reviewed our experience to determine the cost of switching and the impact on the number of new infections diagnosed. Methods: Information on the number of EIA and PCR tests performed on women was retrieved from an abstracted laboratory information database. We examined records of testing performed between April 1998 and December 2001. Prior to June 2001, all genital swabs were tested using the MicroTrak, II Chlamydia EIA and confirmed by direct fluorescence examination. After July 2001, genital swabs were tested using the COBAS AMPLICOR® C. trachomatis test. Results: During the study period, 62,288 EIA tests were performed on specimens submitted; 2,061 (3.33%) were positive. In the six months when testing was performed by the PCR method, 9,559 PCR tests were performed, 463 (4.84%) were positive; 46% increase. In the three years before PCR testing was implemented, an average of 1,626 specimens were submitted monthly. An average of 54 tests were positive (3.3%). The cost for each positive detected by PCR was $208 Cdn and $226 by EIA. Conclusions: The switch to PCR for the diagnosis of CT produced a marked increase in the number of chlamydia infections diagnosed. The recent increase in the number of reported CT cases in Canada may be due in large part to more sensitive tests. Surprisingly, the cost of each positive test by PCR was $18 Cdn less than that of the EIA. Contexte : Il y a eu une augmentation marquée des infections à Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) dans la région sanitaire de la capitale de la Nouvelle-Écosse, qui coïncidait avec l'utilisation de l'amplification par la polymerase (PCR) en remplacement des essais immunoenzymatiques (EIA). Nous avons fait le bilan de l'expérience afin de déterminer le coût du changement et ses incidences sur le nombre de nouveaux cas d'infection diagnostiqués. Méthode : Les données sur le nombre d'essais EIA et PCR effectués sur des femmes proviennent d'une base de données de laboratoire résumées. Nous avons examiné les dossiers des essais effectués entre avril 1998 et décembre 2001. Avant juin 2001, tous les prélèvements génitaux étaient testés par EIA (MicroTrak II Chlamydia) et confirmés au moyen d'un examen direct par fluorescence. Après juillet 2001, les prélèvements génitaux ont subi le test de dépistage de la C. trachomatis COBAS AMPLICOR®. Résultats : Durant la période à l'étude, 62 288 EIA ont été effectués sur les prélèvements soumis; 2 061 (3,33 %) étaient positifs. Au cours des six mois où l'on a eu recours à la méthode PCR, 9 559 essais ont été effectués, dont 463 (4,84 %) étaient positifs, soit une hausse de 46 %. Les trois années précédant la mise en œuvre des essais PCR, on soumettait en moyenne 1 626 prélèvements par mois, et 54 essais en moyenne étaient positifs (3,3 %). Le coût unitaire des essais PCR positifs était de 208 $CAN (contre 226 $ pour les EIA positifs). Conclusions : L'adoption de la méthode PCR pour le diagnostic de la CT a entraîné une hausse marquée du nombre d'infections à Chlamydia diagnostiquées. La hausse récente du nombre de cas de CT signalés au Canada pourrait s'expliquer en grande partie par la sensibilité accrue des tests. Curieusement, le coût unitaire des essais PCR positifs était inférieur de 18 $CAN à celui des EIA.</abstract><cop>Ottawa, ON</cop><pub>Canadian Public Health Association</pub><pmid>12790500</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF03405072</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-4263
ispartof Canadian journal of public health, 2003-05, Vol.94 (3), p.229-232
issn 0008-4263
1920-7476
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6979981
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Bacterial diseases
Biological and medical sciences
Chlamydia
Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis
Chlamydia trachomatis
Chlamydia trachomatis - isolation & purification
Cost estimates
Costs
Diagnostic tests
Effectiveness
Female
Genitalia
Health sciences
Hospitals
Human bacterial diseases
Humans
Immunoenzyme Techniques - economics
Infections
Infectious diseases
Laboratory procedures
Medical sciences
Microbiology
Miscellaneous
Nova Scotia
Polymerase chain reaction
Polymerase Chain Reaction - economics
Product category rules
Sexually transmitted diseases
Specimens
STD
Testing
Urine
Women
title The Impact of Switching to Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A56%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Switching%20to%20Polymerase%20Chain%20Reaction%20for%20the%20Diagnosis%20of%20Chlamydia%20trachomatis%20Infections%20in%20Women&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Forward,%20Kevin%20R.&rft.date=2003-05-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=229-232&rft.issn=0008-4263&rft.eissn=1920-7476&rft.coden=CJPEA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03405072&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E41993648%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220173068&rft_id=info:pmid/12790500&rft_jstor_id=41993648&rfr_iscdi=true