Closer to Home: The Case for Experiential Participation in Health Reform

This article describes partial results from a case study of community participation in "New Directions for a Healthy B.C.", a nowabandoned health reform policy. For this study, focus groups were conducted to explore the perspectives of traditionally under-represented citizens in understand...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of public health 1999-01, Vol.90 (1), p.30-34
1. Verfasser: Higgins, Joan Wharf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue 1
container_start_page 30
container_title Canadian journal of public health
container_volume 90
creator Higgins, Joan Wharf
description This article describes partial results from a case study of community participation in "New Directions for a Healthy B.C.", a nowabandoned health reform policy. For this study, focus groups were conducted to explore the perspectives of traditionally under-represented citizens in understanding reasons for nonparticipation and to identify strategies for fostering participation in the health reform process. The findings indicate that participating in traditional ways - committee meetings, public fora, completing surveys - was not relevant to the realities of these individuals. Yet, rather than merely refusing to be involved, focus group members extended an invitation for health planning group members to experience their daily lives; an idea that is referred to in the literature as 'experiential participation.' In order to foster broad-based participation in community health initiatives, the findings from this study argue for a new understanding of, and appreciation for what actually constitutes participation. Cet article décrit les résultats partiels d'une étude de cas impliquant la participation de la communauté sur «les nouvelles directives pour une Colombie-Britannique en bonne santé», programme de réforme sur la santé maintenant annulé. Pour cette étude, des groupes d'observation furent établis afin d'étudier le point de vue de citoyens habituellement sous-représentés et pour comprendre les raisons de leur manque de participation ainsi que pour identifier les stratégies qui inciteront leur participation au processus de réforme sur la santé. Les résultats indiquent qu'une participation de type traditionnel (réunions de comités, forum au public, sondages) ne s'accordait pas à la réalité quotidienne de ces individus. Cependant, plutôt que de simplement refuser de s'impliquer dans les recherches, les membres des groupes d'observation ont invité les autres participants à venir observer leur vie de tous les jours – un concept auquel on fait souvent référence sous le terme de «participation expérimentale.» Afin d'encourager une vaste participation aux initiatives sur la santé au niveau de la communauté, les résultats de cette étude montrent à la fois une nouvelle compréhension et une nouvelle appréciation des éléments constituant réellement la participation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF03404095
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6979772</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41992963</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41992963</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-92a0908fcb00ecf458f9647f28f2c460a6f17000a3b5f91929cc838403cf1bba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0d9LHDEQB_BQKvXUvvS9JYj4IGw7-bH50QdBD-0VBEuxzyGbJr0cu5trsif2v2_kDrV9CmE-DN-ZQegdgY8EQH66vAbGgYNuX6EZ0RQayaV4jWYAoBpOBdtHB6Ws6pcxyd6gfQKaQCvoDC3mfSo-4ynhRRr8Z3y39Hhui8chZXz1sPY5-nGKtsffbJ6ii2s7xTTiOOKFt_20xN99pcMR2gu2L_7t7j1EP66v7uaL5ub2y9f5xU3jeEunRlMLGlRwHYB3gbcqaMFloCpQxwVYEYisQS3r2qDrMNo5xRQH5gLpOssO0fm273rTDf6nq-Gy7c06x8HmPybZaP6tjHFpfqV7I7TUUtLa4HTXIKffG18mM8TifN_b0adNqU4IBVpUePwfXKVNHutwhjKiFRDVVnS2RS6nUrIPT0kImMfrmOfrVPzhZfYXdHuOCk52wBZn-5Dt6GJ5dpJxTVVl77dsVaaUn8qc6Lovwdhf2FWe9A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231980185</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Closer to Home: The Case for Experiential Participation in Health Reform</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Higgins, Joan Wharf</creator><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Joan Wharf</creatorcontrib><description>This article describes partial results from a case study of community participation in "New Directions for a Healthy B.C.", a nowabandoned health reform policy. For this study, focus groups were conducted to explore the perspectives of traditionally under-represented citizens in understanding reasons for nonparticipation and to identify strategies for fostering participation in the health reform process. The findings indicate that participating in traditional ways - committee meetings, public fora, completing surveys - was not relevant to the realities of these individuals. Yet, rather than merely refusing to be involved, focus group members extended an invitation for health planning group members to experience their daily lives; an idea that is referred to in the literature as 'experiential participation.' In order to foster broad-based participation in community health initiatives, the findings from this study argue for a new understanding of, and appreciation for what actually constitutes participation. Cet article décrit les résultats partiels d'une étude de cas impliquant la participation de la communauté sur «les nouvelles directives pour une Colombie-Britannique en bonne santé», programme de réforme sur la santé maintenant annulé. Pour cette étude, des groupes d'observation furent établis afin d'étudier le point de vue de citoyens habituellement sous-représentés et pour comprendre les raisons de leur manque de participation ainsi que pour identifier les stratégies qui inciteront leur participation au processus de réforme sur la santé. Les résultats indiquent qu'une participation de type traditionnel (réunions de comités, forum au public, sondages) ne s'accordait pas à la réalité quotidienne de ces individus. Cependant, plutôt que de simplement refuser de s'impliquer dans les recherches, les membres des groupes d'observation ont invité les autres participants à venir observer leur vie de tous les jours – un concept auquel on fait souvent référence sous le terme de «participation expérimentale.» Afin d'encourager une vaste participation aux initiatives sur la santé au niveau de la communauté, les résultats de cette étude montrent à la fois une nouvelle compréhension et une nouvelle appréciation des éléments constituant réellement la participation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1920-7476</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03404095</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10910562</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJPEA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa, ON: Canadian Public Health Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Attitude to Health ; Biological and medical sciences ; British Columbia ; Citizen participation ; Citizenship ; Communities ; Community development ; Community health ; Community Participation ; Focus Groups ; General aspects ; Health Care Reform - organization &amp; administration ; Health planning ; Health Planning - organization &amp; administration ; Health promotion ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Minority Groups - psychology ; Needs Assessment ; Objectives ; Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation ; Public health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Public participation ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of public health, 1999-01, Vol.90 (1), p.30-34</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Public Health Association Jan/Feb 1999</rights><rights>The Canadian Public Health Association 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-92a0908fcb00ecf458f9647f28f2c460a6f17000a3b5f91929cc838403cf1bba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-92a0908fcb00ecf458f9647f28f2c460a6f17000a3b5f91929cc838403cf1bba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41992963$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41992963$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,4010,27900,27901,27902,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1734928$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10910562$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Joan Wharf</creatorcontrib><title>Closer to Home: The Case for Experiential Participation in Health Reform</title><title>Canadian journal of public health</title><addtitle>Can J Public Health</addtitle><description>This article describes partial results from a case study of community participation in "New Directions for a Healthy B.C.", a nowabandoned health reform policy. For this study, focus groups were conducted to explore the perspectives of traditionally under-represented citizens in understanding reasons for nonparticipation and to identify strategies for fostering participation in the health reform process. The findings indicate that participating in traditional ways - committee meetings, public fora, completing surveys - was not relevant to the realities of these individuals. Yet, rather than merely refusing to be involved, focus group members extended an invitation for health planning group members to experience their daily lives; an idea that is referred to in the literature as 'experiential participation.' In order to foster broad-based participation in community health initiatives, the findings from this study argue for a new understanding of, and appreciation for what actually constitutes participation. Cet article décrit les résultats partiels d'une étude de cas impliquant la participation de la communauté sur «les nouvelles directives pour une Colombie-Britannique en bonne santé», programme de réforme sur la santé maintenant annulé. Pour cette étude, des groupes d'observation furent établis afin d'étudier le point de vue de citoyens habituellement sous-représentés et pour comprendre les raisons de leur manque de participation ainsi que pour identifier les stratégies qui inciteront leur participation au processus de réforme sur la santé. Les résultats indiquent qu'une participation de type traditionnel (réunions de comités, forum au public, sondages) ne s'accordait pas à la réalité quotidienne de ces individus. Cependant, plutôt que de simplement refuser de s'impliquer dans les recherches, les membres des groupes d'observation ont invité les autres participants à venir observer leur vie de tous les jours – un concept auquel on fait souvent référence sous le terme de «participation expérimentale.» Afin d'encourager une vaste participation aux initiatives sur la santé au niveau de la communauté, les résultats de cette étude montrent à la fois une nouvelle compréhension et une nouvelle appréciation des éléments constituant réellement la participation.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>British Columbia</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community development</subject><subject>Community health</subject><subject>Community Participation</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health Care Reform - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Health planning</subject><subject>Health Planning - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minority Groups - psychology</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0008-4263</issn><issn>1920-7476</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0d9LHDEQB_BQKvXUvvS9JYj4IGw7-bH50QdBD-0VBEuxzyGbJr0cu5trsif2v2_kDrV9CmE-DN-ZQegdgY8EQH66vAbGgYNuX6EZ0RQayaV4jWYAoBpOBdtHB6Ws6pcxyd6gfQKaQCvoDC3mfSo-4ynhRRr8Z3y39Hhui8chZXz1sPY5-nGKtsffbJ6ii2s7xTTiOOKFt_20xN99pcMR2gu2L_7t7j1EP66v7uaL5ub2y9f5xU3jeEunRlMLGlRwHYB3gbcqaMFloCpQxwVYEYisQS3r2qDrMNo5xRQH5gLpOssO0fm273rTDf6nq-Gy7c06x8HmPybZaP6tjHFpfqV7I7TUUtLa4HTXIKffG18mM8TifN_b0adNqU4IBVpUePwfXKVNHutwhjKiFRDVVnS2RS6nUrIPT0kImMfrmOfrVPzhZfYXdHuOCk52wBZn-5Dt6GJ5dpJxTVVl77dsVaaUn8qc6Lovwdhf2FWe9A</recordid><startdate>19990101</startdate><enddate>19990101</enddate><creator>Higgins, Joan Wharf</creator><general>Canadian Public Health Association</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990101</creationdate><title>Closer to Home: The Case for Experiential Participation in Health Reform</title><author>Higgins, Joan Wharf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-92a0908fcb00ecf458f9647f28f2c460a6f17000a3b5f91929cc838403cf1bba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>British Columbia</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community development</topic><topic>Community health</topic><topic>Community Participation</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health Care Reform - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Health planning</topic><topic>Health Planning - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minority Groups - psychology</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Joan Wharf</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Higgins, Joan Wharf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Closer to Home: The Case for Experiential Participation in Health Reform</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of public health</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Public Health</addtitle><date>1999-01-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>30-34</pages><issn>0008-4263</issn><eissn>1920-7476</eissn><coden>CJPEA4</coden><abstract>This article describes partial results from a case study of community participation in "New Directions for a Healthy B.C.", a nowabandoned health reform policy. For this study, focus groups were conducted to explore the perspectives of traditionally under-represented citizens in understanding reasons for nonparticipation and to identify strategies for fostering participation in the health reform process. The findings indicate that participating in traditional ways - committee meetings, public fora, completing surveys - was not relevant to the realities of these individuals. Yet, rather than merely refusing to be involved, focus group members extended an invitation for health planning group members to experience their daily lives; an idea that is referred to in the literature as 'experiential participation.' In order to foster broad-based participation in community health initiatives, the findings from this study argue for a new understanding of, and appreciation for what actually constitutes participation. Cet article décrit les résultats partiels d'une étude de cas impliquant la participation de la communauté sur «les nouvelles directives pour une Colombie-Britannique en bonne santé», programme de réforme sur la santé maintenant annulé. Pour cette étude, des groupes d'observation furent établis afin d'étudier le point de vue de citoyens habituellement sous-représentés et pour comprendre les raisons de leur manque de participation ainsi que pour identifier les stratégies qui inciteront leur participation au processus de réforme sur la santé. Les résultats indiquent qu'une participation de type traditionnel (réunions de comités, forum au public, sondages) ne s'accordait pas à la réalité quotidienne de ces individus. Cependant, plutôt que de simplement refuser de s'impliquer dans les recherches, les membres des groupes d'observation ont invité les autres participants à venir observer leur vie de tous les jours – un concept auquel on fait souvent référence sous le terme de «participation expérimentale.» Afin d'encourager une vaste participation aux initiatives sur la santé au niveau de la communauté, les résultats de cette étude montrent à la fois une nouvelle compréhension et une nouvelle appréciation des éléments constituant réellement la participation.</abstract><cop>Ottawa, ON</cop><pub>Canadian Public Health Association</pub><pmid>10910562</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF03404095</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-4263
ispartof Canadian journal of public health, 1999-01, Vol.90 (1), p.30-34
issn 0008-4263
1920-7476
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6979772
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Attitude to Health
Biological and medical sciences
British Columbia
Citizen participation
Citizenship
Communities
Community development
Community health
Community Participation
Focus Groups
General aspects
Health Care Reform - organization & administration
Health planning
Health Planning - organization & administration
Health promotion
Humans
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Minority Groups - psychology
Needs Assessment
Objectives
Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation
Public health
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Public participation
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Closer to Home: The Case for Experiential Participation in Health Reform
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T12%3A20%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Closer%20to%20Home:%20The%20Case%20for%20Experiential%20Participation%20in%20Health%20Reform&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Higgins,%20Joan%20Wharf&rft.date=1999-01-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=30-34&rft.issn=0008-4263&rft.eissn=1920-7476&rft.coden=CJPEA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03404095&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E41992963%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231980185&rft_id=info:pmid/10910562&rft_jstor_id=41992963&rfr_iscdi=true