Mumps Virus Detection During an Outbreak in a Highly Unvaccinated Population in British Columbia

Objectives: Control measures of mumps involve isolation of those symptomatic or potentially exposed. Recent guidelines have recommended shortening the isolation period from 9 days to 5 days after the onset of parotitis, despite using mainly historical evidence. In British Columbia, mumps circulated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of public health 2011-01, Vol.102 (1), p.47-50
Hauptverfasser: Tan, Kennard E., Anderson, Maureen, Krajden, Mel, Petric, Martin, Mak, Annie, Naus, Monika
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 47
container_title Canadian journal of public health
container_volume 102
creator Tan, Kennard E.
Anderson, Maureen
Krajden, Mel
Petric, Martin
Mak, Annie
Naus, Monika
description Objectives: Control measures of mumps involve isolation of those symptomatic or potentially exposed. Recent guidelines have recommended shortening the isolation period from 9 days to 5 days after the onset of parotitis, despite using mainly historical evidence. In British Columbia, mumps circulated in a predominantly unvaccinated population in 2008. We compared laboratory findings between the different vaccination groups and assessed the period of mumps viral detection after onset of parotitis. Methods: Demographic and clinical data were collected according to guidelines during the course of the outbreak. Clinical specimens, including buccal swabs, urine, CSF and sera, were collected on a single visit upon presentation for diagnosis. Laboratory diagnosis of mumps was confirmed by either virus detection by PCR and/or isolation in cell culture from clinical specimens, or by serology. Results: Laboratory testing confirmed mumps on 85 (74%) of 115 cases by virus detection and/or serology. Thirty-nine (78%) of 50 cases had virus detected within the first 5 days after onset of parotitis, with the rate highest in specimens collected early. However, virus could be detected in 5 (56%) of 9 cases after day 5 and up to day 9. Conclusion: Our study questions whether a 5-day isolation period is sufficient to prevent mumps transmission in a susceptible population. Our observations are based on single specimen submission, whereas an optimal study design would entail serial collection after presentation of parotitis, as this reflects true viral shedding. Further investigations are warranted to validate patient isolation guidelines. Objectifs : La lutte contre les oreillons consiste à isoler les personnes symptomatiques ou potentiellement exposées. Des lignes directrices récentes recommandent de réduire la période d'isolement de 9 à 5 jours après l'apparition d'une parotidite, mais les preuves à l'appui sont principalement de nature historique. En Colombie-Britannique, les oreillons ont circulé en 2008 dans une population majoritairement non vaccinée. Nous avons comparé les résultats de laboratoire des deux groupes (vaccinés et non vaccinés) et déterminé le délai de détection virale des oreillons après l'apparition de la parotidite. Méthode : Nos données démographiques et cliniques ont été recueillies selon les lignes directrices, durant l'éclosion. Des prélèvements cliniques (buccaux, urinaires, de liquide céphalorachidien et de sérum) ont été obtenus au cours d'une même
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF03404876
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6974105</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A255654505</galeid><jstor_id>41996177</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A255654505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c689t-15a8f04a2d7f8b0f4c35b270e63cc27aa77ae358349b9b6dc4e283c8d37efa273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0s9v0zAUB_AIgVgZXLiDoiFAgDLs2LGdC9LWMTZpMCQYV-O4TuousTPbmdh_j7uW_kCVD5Gdj78v0XtJ8hyCQwgA_Xh8ChAGmFHyIBnBMgcZxZQ8TEYAAJbhnKC95In3s7hFiKLHyV4OMStKQkbJ769D1_v0l3aDT09UUDJoa9KTwWnTpMKkl0OonBLXqTapSM90M23v0itzK6TURgQ1Sb_bfmjF_bVojp0O2k_TsW2HrtLiafKoFq1Xz5bP_eTq9PPP8Vl2cfnlfHx0kUnCypDBQrAaYJFPaM0qUGOJiiqnQBEkZU6FoFQoVDCEy6qsyERilTMk2QRRVYucov3k0yK3H6pOTaQywYmW9053wt1xKzTffmP0lDf2lpOSYgiKGPB2GeDszaB84J32UrWtMMoOnjOSA1AwCKM8-E_O7OBM_LuIMCsBZCSiVwvUiFZxbWobq8p5JD_Ki4IUuLgvmu1QjTIqfqI1qtbxeMsf7PCy1zd8Ex3uQHFNVKflztR3WxeiCepPaMTgPT__8W3bvtmwUyXaMPWx1_P--234fgGls947Va96AQGfzy1fz23ELze7t6L_BjWC10sgvBRt7YSR2q9dzCEFwdF9WDjfzydYuXVvdpZ9sdAzH6xbpWFYlgRSiv4CGVIHiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>864890186</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mumps Virus Detection During an Outbreak in a Highly Unvaccinated Population in British Columbia</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>REPÈRE - Free</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tan, Kennard E. ; Anderson, Maureen ; Krajden, Mel ; Petric, Martin ; Mak, Annie ; Naus, Monika</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Kennard E. ; Anderson, Maureen ; Krajden, Mel ; Petric, Martin ; Mak, Annie ; Naus, Monika</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: Control measures of mumps involve isolation of those symptomatic or potentially exposed. Recent guidelines have recommended shortening the isolation period from 9 days to 5 days after the onset of parotitis, despite using mainly historical evidence. In British Columbia, mumps circulated in a predominantly unvaccinated population in 2008. We compared laboratory findings between the different vaccination groups and assessed the period of mumps viral detection after onset of parotitis. Methods: Demographic and clinical data were collected according to guidelines during the course of the outbreak. Clinical specimens, including buccal swabs, urine, CSF and sera, were collected on a single visit upon presentation for diagnosis. Laboratory diagnosis of mumps was confirmed by either virus detection by PCR and/or isolation in cell culture from clinical specimens, or by serology. Results: Laboratory testing confirmed mumps on 85 (74%) of 115 cases by virus detection and/or serology. Thirty-nine (78%) of 50 cases had virus detected within the first 5 days after onset of parotitis, with the rate highest in specimens collected early. However, virus could be detected in 5 (56%) of 9 cases after day 5 and up to day 9. Conclusion: Our study questions whether a 5-day isolation period is sufficient to prevent mumps transmission in a susceptible population. Our observations are based on single specimen submission, whereas an optimal study design would entail serial collection after presentation of parotitis, as this reflects true viral shedding. Further investigations are warranted to validate patient isolation guidelines. Objectifs : La lutte contre les oreillons consiste à isoler les personnes symptomatiques ou potentiellement exposées. Des lignes directrices récentes recommandent de réduire la période d'isolement de 9 à 5 jours après l'apparition d'une parotidite, mais les preuves à l'appui sont principalement de nature historique. En Colombie-Britannique, les oreillons ont circulé en 2008 dans une population majoritairement non vaccinée. Nous avons comparé les résultats de laboratoire des deux groupes (vaccinés et non vaccinés) et déterminé le délai de détection virale des oreillons après l'apparition de la parotidite. Méthode : Nos données démographiques et cliniques ont été recueillies selon les lignes directrices, durant l'éclosion. Des prélèvements cliniques (buccaux, urinaires, de liquide céphalorachidien et de sérum) ont été obtenus au cours d'une même visite de diagnostic. Le diagnostic d'oreillons obtenu en laboratoire a été confirmé soit au moyen d'une détection virale par RPC et/ou par isolement en culture cellulaire à partir des prélèvements cliniques, soit par sérologie. Résultats : Les épreuves de laboratoire ont confirmé les oreillons dans 85 des 115 cas (74 %), par détection virale et/ou par sérologie. Dans 39 cas sur 50 (78 %) le virus a été détecté dans un délai de 5 jours après l'apparition de la parotidite, le taux le plus élevé ayant été observé dans les échantillons prélevés tôt. Cependant, on pouvait encore détecter le virus dans 5 cas sur 9 (56 %) après le jour 5 et jusqu'au jour 9. Conclusion : On peut se demander si une période d'isolement de 5 jours est suffisante pour prévenir la transmission des oreillons dans une population réceptive. Nos observations reposent sur une seule séance de prélèvement, tandis qu'un protocole d'étude optimal impliquerait une série de prélèvements après l'apparition de la parotidite, pour tenir compte de l'excrétion réelle du virus. Il faudrait pousser la recherche pour valider les lignes directrices sur l'isolement des patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1920-7476</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03404876</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21485966</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJPEA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Canadian Public Health Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; British Columbia - epidemiology ; Canada ; Cell culture techniques ; Development and progression ; Disease control ; Disease outbreaks ; Disease Outbreaks - prevention &amp; control ; Epidemics ; Health aspects ; Human viral diseases ; Humans ; Identification and classification ; Illnesses ; Immunization ; Infectious diseases ; Mathematical models ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Miscellaneous ; Mumps ; Mumps - epidemiology ; Mumps - prevention &amp; control ; Mumps - transmission ; Mumps - virology ; Mumps virus ; Parotitis ; Patient Isolation ; Public Health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH ; Retrospective Studies ; Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction ; Serology ; Specimens ; Time Factors ; Vaccination ; Vaccines ; Viral diseases ; Viral diseases of the respiratory system and ent viral diseases ; Virus Shedding ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of public health, 2011-01, Vol.102 (1), p.47-50</ispartof><rights>Canadian Public Health Association, 2011 © Association canadienne de santé publique, 2011</rights><rights>The Canadian Public Health Association 2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Springer</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Public Health Association Jan/Feb 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c689t-15a8f04a2d7f8b0f4c35b270e63cc27aa77ae358349b9b6dc4e283c8d37efa273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c689t-15a8f04a2d7f8b0f4c35b270e63cc27aa77ae358349b9b6dc4e283c8d37efa273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41996177$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41996177$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,4010,27900,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24046564$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21485966$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Kennard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krajden, Mel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petric, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mak, Annie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naus, Monika</creatorcontrib><title>Mumps Virus Detection During an Outbreak in a Highly Unvaccinated Population in British Columbia</title><title>Canadian journal of public health</title><addtitle>Can J Public Health</addtitle><addtitle>Can J Public Health</addtitle><description>Objectives: Control measures of mumps involve isolation of those symptomatic or potentially exposed. Recent guidelines have recommended shortening the isolation period from 9 days to 5 days after the onset of parotitis, despite using mainly historical evidence. In British Columbia, mumps circulated in a predominantly unvaccinated population in 2008. We compared laboratory findings between the different vaccination groups and assessed the period of mumps viral detection after onset of parotitis. Methods: Demographic and clinical data were collected according to guidelines during the course of the outbreak. Clinical specimens, including buccal swabs, urine, CSF and sera, were collected on a single visit upon presentation for diagnosis. Laboratory diagnosis of mumps was confirmed by either virus detection by PCR and/or isolation in cell culture from clinical specimens, or by serology. Results: Laboratory testing confirmed mumps on 85 (74%) of 115 cases by virus detection and/or serology. Thirty-nine (78%) of 50 cases had virus detected within the first 5 days after onset of parotitis, with the rate highest in specimens collected early. However, virus could be detected in 5 (56%) of 9 cases after day 5 and up to day 9. Conclusion: Our study questions whether a 5-day isolation period is sufficient to prevent mumps transmission in a susceptible population. Our observations are based on single specimen submission, whereas an optimal study design would entail serial collection after presentation of parotitis, as this reflects true viral shedding. Further investigations are warranted to validate patient isolation guidelines. Objectifs : La lutte contre les oreillons consiste à isoler les personnes symptomatiques ou potentiellement exposées. Des lignes directrices récentes recommandent de réduire la période d'isolement de 9 à 5 jours après l'apparition d'une parotidite, mais les preuves à l'appui sont principalement de nature historique. En Colombie-Britannique, les oreillons ont circulé en 2008 dans une population majoritairement non vaccinée. Nous avons comparé les résultats de laboratoire des deux groupes (vaccinés et non vaccinés) et déterminé le délai de détection virale des oreillons après l'apparition de la parotidite. Méthode : Nos données démographiques et cliniques ont été recueillies selon les lignes directrices, durant l'éclosion. Des prélèvements cliniques (buccaux, urinaires, de liquide céphalorachidien et de sérum) ont été obtenus au cours d'une même visite de diagnostic. Le diagnostic d'oreillons obtenu en laboratoire a été confirmé soit au moyen d'une détection virale par RPC et/ou par isolement en culture cellulaire à partir des prélèvements cliniques, soit par sérologie. Résultats : Les épreuves de laboratoire ont confirmé les oreillons dans 85 des 115 cas (74 %), par détection virale et/ou par sérologie. Dans 39 cas sur 50 (78 %) le virus a été détecté dans un délai de 5 jours après l'apparition de la parotidite, le taux le plus élevé ayant été observé dans les échantillons prélevés tôt. Cependant, on pouvait encore détecter le virus dans 5 cas sur 9 (56 %) après le jour 5 et jusqu'au jour 9. Conclusion : On peut se demander si une période d'isolement de 5 jours est suffisante pour prévenir la transmission des oreillons dans une population réceptive. Nos observations reposent sur une seule séance de prélèvement, tandis qu'un protocole d'étude optimal impliquerait une série de prélèvements après l'apparition de la parotidite, pour tenir compte de l'excrétion réelle du virus. Il faudrait pousser la recherche pour valider les lignes directrices sur l'isolement des patients.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>British Columbia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Cell culture techniques</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease outbreaks</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Human viral diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Mumps</subject><subject>Mumps - epidemiology</subject><subject>Mumps - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Mumps - transmission</subject><subject>Mumps - virology</subject><subject>Mumps virus</subject><subject>Parotitis</subject><subject>Patient Isolation</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Serology</subject><subject>Specimens</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral diseases of the respiratory system and ent viral diseases</subject><subject>Virus Shedding</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>0008-4263</issn><issn>1920-7476</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0s9v0zAUB_AIgVgZXLiDoiFAgDLs2LGdC9LWMTZpMCQYV-O4TuousTPbmdh_j7uW_kCVD5Gdj78v0XtJ8hyCQwgA_Xh8ChAGmFHyIBnBMgcZxZQ8TEYAAJbhnKC95In3s7hFiKLHyV4OMStKQkbJ769D1_v0l3aDT09UUDJoa9KTwWnTpMKkl0OonBLXqTapSM90M23v0itzK6TURgQ1Sb_bfmjF_bVojp0O2k_TsW2HrtLiafKoFq1Xz5bP_eTq9PPP8Vl2cfnlfHx0kUnCypDBQrAaYJFPaM0qUGOJiiqnQBEkZU6FoFQoVDCEy6qsyERilTMk2QRRVYucov3k0yK3H6pOTaQywYmW9053wt1xKzTffmP0lDf2lpOSYgiKGPB2GeDszaB84J32UrWtMMoOnjOSA1AwCKM8-E_O7OBM_LuIMCsBZCSiVwvUiFZxbWobq8p5JD_Ki4IUuLgvmu1QjTIqfqI1qtbxeMsf7PCy1zd8Ex3uQHFNVKflztR3WxeiCepPaMTgPT__8W3bvtmwUyXaMPWx1_P--234fgGls947Va96AQGfzy1fz23ELze7t6L_BjWC10sgvBRt7YSR2q9dzCEFwdF9WDjfzydYuXVvdpZ9sdAzH6xbpWFYlgRSiv4CGVIHiw</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Tan, Kennard E.</creator><creator>Anderson, Maureen</creator><creator>Krajden, Mel</creator><creator>Petric, Martin</creator><creator>Mak, Annie</creator><creator>Naus, Monika</creator><general>Canadian Public Health Association</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Mumps Virus Detection During an Outbreak in a Highly Unvaccinated Population in British Columbia</title><author>Tan, Kennard E. ; Anderson, Maureen ; Krajden, Mel ; Petric, Martin ; Mak, Annie ; Naus, Monika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c689t-15a8f04a2d7f8b0f4c35b270e63cc27aa77ae358349b9b6dc4e283c8d37efa273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>British Columbia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Cell culture techniques</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease outbreaks</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Human viral diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Mumps</topic><topic>Mumps - epidemiology</topic><topic>Mumps - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Mumps - transmission</topic><topic>Mumps - virology</topic><topic>Mumps virus</topic><topic>Parotitis</topic><topic>Patient Isolation</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Serology</topic><topic>Specimens</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral diseases of the respiratory system and ent viral diseases</topic><topic>Virus Shedding</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Kennard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Maureen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krajden, Mel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petric, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mak, Annie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naus, Monika</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Kennard E.</au><au>Anderson, Maureen</au><au>Krajden, Mel</au><au>Petric, Martin</au><au>Mak, Annie</au><au>Naus, Monika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mumps Virus Detection During an Outbreak in a Highly Unvaccinated Population in British Columbia</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of public health</jtitle><stitle>Can J Public Health</stitle><addtitle>Can J Public Health</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>47-50</pages><issn>0008-4263</issn><eissn>1920-7476</eissn><coden>CJPEA4</coden><abstract>Objectives: Control measures of mumps involve isolation of those symptomatic or potentially exposed. Recent guidelines have recommended shortening the isolation period from 9 days to 5 days after the onset of parotitis, despite using mainly historical evidence. In British Columbia, mumps circulated in a predominantly unvaccinated population in 2008. We compared laboratory findings between the different vaccination groups and assessed the period of mumps viral detection after onset of parotitis. Methods: Demographic and clinical data were collected according to guidelines during the course of the outbreak. Clinical specimens, including buccal swabs, urine, CSF and sera, were collected on a single visit upon presentation for diagnosis. Laboratory diagnosis of mumps was confirmed by either virus detection by PCR and/or isolation in cell culture from clinical specimens, or by serology. Results: Laboratory testing confirmed mumps on 85 (74%) of 115 cases by virus detection and/or serology. Thirty-nine (78%) of 50 cases had virus detected within the first 5 days after onset of parotitis, with the rate highest in specimens collected early. However, virus could be detected in 5 (56%) of 9 cases after day 5 and up to day 9. Conclusion: Our study questions whether a 5-day isolation period is sufficient to prevent mumps transmission in a susceptible population. Our observations are based on single specimen submission, whereas an optimal study design would entail serial collection after presentation of parotitis, as this reflects true viral shedding. Further investigations are warranted to validate patient isolation guidelines. Objectifs : La lutte contre les oreillons consiste à isoler les personnes symptomatiques ou potentiellement exposées. Des lignes directrices récentes recommandent de réduire la période d'isolement de 9 à 5 jours après l'apparition d'une parotidite, mais les preuves à l'appui sont principalement de nature historique. En Colombie-Britannique, les oreillons ont circulé en 2008 dans une population majoritairement non vaccinée. Nous avons comparé les résultats de laboratoire des deux groupes (vaccinés et non vaccinés) et déterminé le délai de détection virale des oreillons après l'apparition de la parotidite. Méthode : Nos données démographiques et cliniques ont été recueillies selon les lignes directrices, durant l'éclosion. Des prélèvements cliniques (buccaux, urinaires, de liquide céphalorachidien et de sérum) ont été obtenus au cours d'une même visite de diagnostic. Le diagnostic d'oreillons obtenu en laboratoire a été confirmé soit au moyen d'une détection virale par RPC et/ou par isolement en culture cellulaire à partir des prélèvements cliniques, soit par sérologie. Résultats : Les épreuves de laboratoire ont confirmé les oreillons dans 85 des 115 cas (74 %), par détection virale et/ou par sérologie. Dans 39 cas sur 50 (78 %) le virus a été détecté dans un délai de 5 jours après l'apparition de la parotidite, le taux le plus élevé ayant été observé dans les échantillons prélevés tôt. Cependant, on pouvait encore détecter le virus dans 5 cas sur 9 (56 %) après le jour 5 et jusqu'au jour 9. Conclusion : On peut se demander si une période d'isolement de 5 jours est suffisante pour prévenir la transmission des oreillons dans une population réceptive. Nos observations reposent sur une seule séance de prélèvement, tandis qu'un protocole d'étude optimal impliquerait une série de prélèvements après l'apparition de la parotidite, pour tenir compte de l'excrétion réelle du virus. Il faudrait pousser la recherche pour valider les lignes directrices sur l'isolement des patients.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Canadian Public Health Association</pub><pmid>21485966</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF03404876</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-4263
ispartof Canadian journal of public health, 2011-01, Vol.102 (1), p.47-50
issn 0008-4263
1920-7476
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6974105
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; REPÈRE - Free; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biological and medical sciences
British Columbia - epidemiology
Canada
Cell culture techniques
Development and progression
Disease control
Disease outbreaks
Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control
Epidemics
Health aspects
Human viral diseases
Humans
Identification and classification
Illnesses
Immunization
Infectious diseases
Mathematical models
Medical sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Miscellaneous
Mumps
Mumps - epidemiology
Mumps - prevention & control
Mumps - transmission
Mumps - virology
Mumps virus
Parotitis
Patient Isolation
Public Health
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
Retrospective Studies
Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
Serology
Specimens
Time Factors
Vaccination
Vaccines
Viral diseases
Viral diseases of the respiratory system and ent viral diseases
Virus Shedding
Viruses
title Mumps Virus Detection During an Outbreak in a Highly Unvaccinated Population in British Columbia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T14%3A15%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mumps%20Virus%20Detection%20During%20an%20Outbreak%20in%20a%20Highly%20Unvaccinated%20Population%20in%20British%20Columbia&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Tan,%20Kennard%20E.&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=47-50&rft.issn=0008-4263&rft.eissn=1920-7476&rft.coden=CJPEA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03404876&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA255654505%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=864890186&rft_id=info:pmid/21485966&rft_galeid=A255654505&rft_jstor_id=41996177&rfr_iscdi=true