Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO2 concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods

Main conclusion Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO 2 concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO 2 , representing the year 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively. There are several lines of evidence suggesting that the vast majority of C3 plants...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Planta 2020-02, Vol.251 (2), Article 52
Hauptverfasser: Batke, Sven Peter, Yiotis, Charilaos, Elliott-Kingston, Caroline, Holohan, Aidan, McElwain, Jennifer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Planta
container_volume 251
creator Batke, Sven Peter
Yiotis, Charilaos
Elliott-Kingston, Caroline
Holohan, Aidan
McElwain, Jennifer
description Main conclusion Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO 2 concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO 2 , representing the year 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively. There are several lines of evidence suggesting that the vast majority of C3 plants respond to elevated atmospheric CO 2 by decreasing their stomatal conductance ( g s ). However, in the majority of CO 2 enrichment studies, the response to elevated CO 2 are tested between plants grown under ambient (380–420 ppm) and high (538–680 ppm) CO 2 concentrations and measured usually at single time points in a diurnal cycle. We investigated g s responses to simulated decadal increments in CO 2 predicted over the next 4 decades and tested how measurements of g s may differ when two alternative sampling methods are employed (infrared gas analyzer [IRGA] vs. leaf porometer). We exposed Populus tremula , Popolus tremuloides and Sambucus racemosa to four different CO 2 concentrations over 126 days in experimental growth chambers at 350, 420, 490 and 560 ppm CO 2 ; representing the years 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively (RCP4.5 scenario). Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO 2 concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO 2 . Under natural conditions, maximum operational g s is often reached in the late morning to early afternoon, with a mid-day depression around noon. However, we showed that the daily maximum g s can, in some species, shift later into the day when plants are exposed to only small increases (70 ppm) in CO 2 . A non-linear decreases in g s and a shifting diurnal stomatal behavior under elevated CO 2 , could affect the long-term daily water and carbon budget of many plants in the future, and therefore alter soil–plant–atmospheric processes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6965045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2343360564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-c18687d25bd04d2b5aced9445158d97fb462d61e3412e81ce3856596958e6d743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUtv1DAQtlARXQp_oCdLnNOOn0l6qIRWLSBVKgc4W157tpsqsVPb24re-Od4SQXiwmlm9D1mNB8hpwzOGEB7ngEkVw1waEAIKZrnV2TFpOANB9kdkRVA7aEX6pi8zfkeoIJt-4YcC9Yr4B1bkZ9fRxsKTZjnGDJmWiL16Ky3I83OjkiH4BJOGEquLbVlinneYRocXd9y6mJwFUu2DDFc1HGabRrCHS1PkeYSJ1uqU2X5vSu2cmm20zweGBOWXfT5HXm9tWPG9y_1hHy_vvq2_tzc3H76sv540zipWGkc63TXeq42HqTnG2Ud-l5WTHW-b7cbqbnXDIVkHDvmUHRKq173qkPtWylOyOXiO-83E_rl6tHMaZhs-mGiHcy_SBh25i4-Gt1rBVJVgw8vBik-7DEXcx_3KdSbDa_fFxqUPqzhC8ulmHPC7Z8NDMwhNrPEZmps5nds5rmKxCLK8-F5mP5a_0f1C65rnPE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2343360564</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO2 concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><creator>Batke, Sven Peter ; Yiotis, Charilaos ; Elliott-Kingston, Caroline ; Holohan, Aidan ; McElwain, Jennifer</creator><creatorcontrib>Batke, Sven Peter ; Yiotis, Charilaos ; Elliott-Kingston, Caroline ; Holohan, Aidan ; McElwain, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><description>Main conclusion Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO 2 concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO 2 , representing the year 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively. There are several lines of evidence suggesting that the vast majority of C3 plants respond to elevated atmospheric CO 2 by decreasing their stomatal conductance ( g s ). However, in the majority of CO 2 enrichment studies, the response to elevated CO 2 are tested between plants grown under ambient (380–420 ppm) and high (538–680 ppm) CO 2 concentrations and measured usually at single time points in a diurnal cycle. We investigated g s responses to simulated decadal increments in CO 2 predicted over the next 4 decades and tested how measurements of g s may differ when two alternative sampling methods are employed (infrared gas analyzer [IRGA] vs. leaf porometer). We exposed Populus tremula , Popolus tremuloides and Sambucus racemosa to four different CO 2 concentrations over 126 days in experimental growth chambers at 350, 420, 490 and 560 ppm CO 2 ; representing the years 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively (RCP4.5 scenario). Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO 2 concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO 2 . Under natural conditions, maximum operational g s is often reached in the late morning to early afternoon, with a mid-day depression around noon. However, we showed that the daily maximum g s can, in some species, shift later into the day when plants are exposed to only small increases (70 ppm) in CO 2 . A non-linear decreases in g s and a shifting diurnal stomatal behavior under elevated CO 2 , could affect the long-term daily water and carbon budget of many plants in the future, and therefore alter soil–plant–atmospheric processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0935</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2048</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31950281</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Biology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carbon dioxide ; Conductance ; Diurnal ; Diurnal variations ; Ecology ; Experiments ; Exposure ; Forestry ; Gas analyzers ; Growth chambers ; Infrared analysis ; Life Sciences ; Original ; Original Article ; Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Resistance ; Sampling ; Sampling methods ; Species ; Stomata ; Stomatal conductance</subject><ispartof>Planta, 2020-02, Vol.251 (2), Article 52</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>Planta is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-c18687d25bd04d2b5aced9445158d97fb462d61e3412e81ce3856596958e6d743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-c18687d25bd04d2b5aced9445158d97fb462d61e3412e81ce3856596958e6d743</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1938-3625</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batke, Sven Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiotis, Charilaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott-Kingston, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holohan, Aidan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElwain, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><title>Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO2 concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods</title><title>Planta</title><addtitle>Planta</addtitle><description>Main conclusion Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO 2 concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO 2 , representing the year 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively. There are several lines of evidence suggesting that the vast majority of C3 plants respond to elevated atmospheric CO 2 by decreasing their stomatal conductance ( g s ). However, in the majority of CO 2 enrichment studies, the response to elevated CO 2 are tested between plants grown under ambient (380–420 ppm) and high (538–680 ppm) CO 2 concentrations and measured usually at single time points in a diurnal cycle. We investigated g s responses to simulated decadal increments in CO 2 predicted over the next 4 decades and tested how measurements of g s may differ when two alternative sampling methods are employed (infrared gas analyzer [IRGA] vs. leaf porometer). We exposed Populus tremula , Popolus tremuloides and Sambucus racemosa to four different CO 2 concentrations over 126 days in experimental growth chambers at 350, 420, 490 and 560 ppm CO 2 ; representing the years 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively (RCP4.5 scenario). Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO 2 concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO 2 . Under natural conditions, maximum operational g s is often reached in the late morning to early afternoon, with a mid-day depression around noon. However, we showed that the daily maximum g s can, in some species, shift later into the day when plants are exposed to only small increases (70 ppm) in CO 2 . A non-linear decreases in g s and a shifting diurnal stomatal behavior under elevated CO 2 , could affect the long-term daily water and carbon budget of many plants in the future, and therefore alter soil–plant–atmospheric processes.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Conductance</subject><subject>Diurnal</subject><subject>Diurnal variations</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Gas analyzers</subject><subject>Growth chambers</subject><subject>Infrared analysis</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Stomata</subject><subject>Stomatal conductance</subject><issn>0032-0935</issn><issn>1432-2048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UUtv1DAQtlARXQp_oCdLnNOOn0l6qIRWLSBVKgc4W157tpsqsVPb24re-Od4SQXiwmlm9D1mNB8hpwzOGEB7ngEkVw1waEAIKZrnV2TFpOANB9kdkRVA7aEX6pi8zfkeoIJt-4YcC9Yr4B1bkZ9fRxsKTZjnGDJmWiL16Ky3I83OjkiH4BJOGEquLbVlinneYRocXd9y6mJwFUu2DDFc1HGabRrCHS1PkeYSJ1uqU2X5vSu2cmm20zweGBOWXfT5HXm9tWPG9y_1hHy_vvq2_tzc3H76sv540zipWGkc63TXeq42HqTnG2Ud-l5WTHW-b7cbqbnXDIVkHDvmUHRKq173qkPtWylOyOXiO-83E_rl6tHMaZhs-mGiHcy_SBh25i4-Gt1rBVJVgw8vBik-7DEXcx_3KdSbDa_fFxqUPqzhC8ulmHPC7Z8NDMwhNrPEZmps5nds5rmKxCLK8-F5mP5a_0f1C65rnPE</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Batke, Sven Peter</creator><creator>Yiotis, Charilaos</creator><creator>Elliott-Kingston, Caroline</creator><creator>Holohan, Aidan</creator><creator>McElwain, Jennifer</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1938-3625</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO2 concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods</title><author>Batke, Sven Peter ; Yiotis, Charilaos ; Elliott-Kingston, Caroline ; Holohan, Aidan ; McElwain, Jennifer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-c18687d25bd04d2b5aced9445158d97fb462d61e3412e81ce3856596958e6d743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Conductance</topic><topic>Diurnal</topic><topic>Diurnal variations</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Gas analyzers</topic><topic>Growth chambers</topic><topic>Infrared analysis</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Stomata</topic><topic>Stomatal conductance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batke, Sven Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiotis, Charilaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott-Kingston, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holohan, Aidan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElwain, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Planta</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batke, Sven Peter</au><au>Yiotis, Charilaos</au><au>Elliott-Kingston, Caroline</au><au>Holohan, Aidan</au><au>McElwain, Jennifer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO2 concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods</atitle><jtitle>Planta</jtitle><stitle>Planta</stitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>251</volume><issue>2</issue><artnum>52</artnum><issn>0032-0935</issn><eissn>1432-2048</eissn><abstract>Main conclusion Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO 2 concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO 2 , representing the year 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively. There are several lines of evidence suggesting that the vast majority of C3 plants respond to elevated atmospheric CO 2 by decreasing their stomatal conductance ( g s ). However, in the majority of CO 2 enrichment studies, the response to elevated CO 2 are tested between plants grown under ambient (380–420 ppm) and high (538–680 ppm) CO 2 concentrations and measured usually at single time points in a diurnal cycle. We investigated g s responses to simulated decadal increments in CO 2 predicted over the next 4 decades and tested how measurements of g s may differ when two alternative sampling methods are employed (infrared gas analyzer [IRGA] vs. leaf porometer). We exposed Populus tremula , Popolus tremuloides and Sambucus racemosa to four different CO 2 concentrations over 126 days in experimental growth chambers at 350, 420, 490 and 560 ppm CO 2 ; representing the years 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively (RCP4.5 scenario). Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO 2 concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO 2 . Under natural conditions, maximum operational g s is often reached in the late morning to early afternoon, with a mid-day depression around noon. However, we showed that the daily maximum g s can, in some species, shift later into the day when plants are exposed to only small increases (70 ppm) in CO 2 . A non-linear decreases in g s and a shifting diurnal stomatal behavior under elevated CO 2 , could affect the long-term daily water and carbon budget of many plants in the future, and therefore alter soil–plant–atmospheric processes.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31950281</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1938-3625</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-0935
ispartof Planta, 2020-02, Vol.251 (2), Article 52
issn 0032-0935
1432-2048
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6965045
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Online Journals Complete
subjects Agriculture
Biology
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Carbon dioxide
Conductance
Diurnal
Diurnal variations
Ecology
Experiments
Exposure
Forestry
Gas analyzers
Growth chambers
Infrared analysis
Life Sciences
Original
Original Article
Physiology
Plant Sciences
Resistance
Sampling
Sampling methods
Species
Stomata
Stomatal conductance
title Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO2 concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T18%3A36%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plant%20responses%20to%20decadal%20scale%20increments%20in%20atmospheric%20CO2%20concentration:%20comparing%20two%20stomatal%20conductance%20sampling%20methods&rft.jtitle=Planta&rft.au=Batke,%20Sven%20Peter&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=251&rft.issue=2&rft.artnum=52&rft.issn=0032-0935&rft.eissn=1432-2048&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2343360564%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2343360564&rft_id=info:pmid/31950281&rfr_iscdi=true