Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO2 concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods
Main conclusion Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO 2 concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO 2 , representing the year 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively. There are several lines of evidence suggesting that the vast majority of C3 plants...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Planta 2020-02, Vol.251 (2), Article 52 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Planta |
container_volume | 251 |
creator | Batke, Sven Peter Yiotis, Charilaos Elliott-Kingston, Caroline Holohan, Aidan McElwain, Jennifer |
description | Main conclusion
Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO
2
concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO
2
, representing the year 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively.
There are several lines of evidence suggesting that the vast majority of C3 plants respond to elevated atmospheric CO
2
by decreasing their stomatal conductance (
g
s
). However, in the majority of CO
2
enrichment studies, the response to elevated CO
2
are tested between plants grown under ambient (380–420 ppm) and high (538–680 ppm) CO
2
concentrations and measured usually at single time points in a diurnal cycle. We investigated
g
s
responses to simulated decadal increments in CO
2
predicted over the next 4 decades and tested how measurements of
g
s
may differ when two alternative sampling methods are employed (infrared gas analyzer [IRGA] vs. leaf porometer). We exposed
Populus tremula
,
Popolus tremuloides
and
Sambucus racemosa
to four different CO
2
concentrations over 126 days in experimental growth chambers at 350, 420, 490 and 560 ppm CO
2
; representing the years 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively (RCP4.5 scenario). Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO
2
concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO
2
. Under natural conditions, maximum operational
g
s
is often reached in the late morning to early afternoon, with a mid-day depression around noon. However, we showed that the daily maximum
g
s
can, in some species, shift later into the day when plants are exposed to only small increases (70 ppm) in CO
2
. A non-linear decreases in
g
s
and a shifting diurnal stomatal behavior under elevated CO
2
, could affect the long-term daily water and carbon budget of many plants in the future, and therefore alter soil–plant–atmospheric processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6965045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2343360564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-c18687d25bd04d2b5aced9445158d97fb462d61e3412e81ce3856596958e6d743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUtv1DAQtlARXQp_oCdLnNOOn0l6qIRWLSBVKgc4W157tpsqsVPb24re-Od4SQXiwmlm9D1mNB8hpwzOGEB7ngEkVw1waEAIKZrnV2TFpOANB9kdkRVA7aEX6pi8zfkeoIJt-4YcC9Yr4B1bkZ9fRxsKTZjnGDJmWiL16Ky3I83OjkiH4BJOGEquLbVlinneYRocXd9y6mJwFUu2DDFc1HGabRrCHS1PkeYSJ1uqU2X5vSu2cmm20zweGBOWXfT5HXm9tWPG9y_1hHy_vvq2_tzc3H76sv540zipWGkc63TXeq42HqTnG2Ud-l5WTHW-b7cbqbnXDIVkHDvmUHRKq173qkPtWylOyOXiO-83E_rl6tHMaZhs-mGiHcy_SBh25i4-Gt1rBVJVgw8vBik-7DEXcx_3KdSbDa_fFxqUPqzhC8ulmHPC7Z8NDMwhNrPEZmps5nds5rmKxCLK8-F5mP5a_0f1C65rnPE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2343360564</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO2 concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><creator>Batke, Sven Peter ; Yiotis, Charilaos ; Elliott-Kingston, Caroline ; Holohan, Aidan ; McElwain, Jennifer</creator><creatorcontrib>Batke, Sven Peter ; Yiotis, Charilaos ; Elliott-Kingston, Caroline ; Holohan, Aidan ; McElwain, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><description>Main conclusion
Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO
2
concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO
2
, representing the year 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively.
There are several lines of evidence suggesting that the vast majority of C3 plants respond to elevated atmospheric CO
2
by decreasing their stomatal conductance (
g
s
). However, in the majority of CO
2
enrichment studies, the response to elevated CO
2
are tested between plants grown under ambient (380–420 ppm) and high (538–680 ppm) CO
2
concentrations and measured usually at single time points in a diurnal cycle. We investigated
g
s
responses to simulated decadal increments in CO
2
predicted over the next 4 decades and tested how measurements of
g
s
may differ when two alternative sampling methods are employed (infrared gas analyzer [IRGA] vs. leaf porometer). We exposed
Populus tremula
,
Popolus tremuloides
and
Sambucus racemosa
to four different CO
2
concentrations over 126 days in experimental growth chambers at 350, 420, 490 and 560 ppm CO
2
; representing the years 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively (RCP4.5 scenario). Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO
2
concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO
2
. Under natural conditions, maximum operational
g
s
is often reached in the late morning to early afternoon, with a mid-day depression around noon. However, we showed that the daily maximum
g
s
can, in some species, shift later into the day when plants are exposed to only small increases (70 ppm) in CO
2
. A non-linear decreases in
g
s
and a shifting diurnal stomatal behavior under elevated CO
2
, could affect the long-term daily water and carbon budget of many plants in the future, and therefore alter soil–plant–atmospheric processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0935</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2048</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31950281</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Biology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carbon dioxide ; Conductance ; Diurnal ; Diurnal variations ; Ecology ; Experiments ; Exposure ; Forestry ; Gas analyzers ; Growth chambers ; Infrared analysis ; Life Sciences ; Original ; Original Article ; Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Resistance ; Sampling ; Sampling methods ; Species ; Stomata ; Stomatal conductance</subject><ispartof>Planta, 2020-02, Vol.251 (2), Article 52</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>Planta is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-c18687d25bd04d2b5aced9445158d97fb462d61e3412e81ce3856596958e6d743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-c18687d25bd04d2b5aced9445158d97fb462d61e3412e81ce3856596958e6d743</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1938-3625</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batke, Sven Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiotis, Charilaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott-Kingston, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holohan, Aidan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElwain, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><title>Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO2 concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods</title><title>Planta</title><addtitle>Planta</addtitle><description>Main conclusion
Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO
2
concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO
2
, representing the year 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively.
There are several lines of evidence suggesting that the vast majority of C3 plants respond to elevated atmospheric CO
2
by decreasing their stomatal conductance (
g
s
). However, in the majority of CO
2
enrichment studies, the response to elevated CO
2
are tested between plants grown under ambient (380–420 ppm) and high (538–680 ppm) CO
2
concentrations and measured usually at single time points in a diurnal cycle. We investigated
g
s
responses to simulated decadal increments in CO
2
predicted over the next 4 decades and tested how measurements of
g
s
may differ when two alternative sampling methods are employed (infrared gas analyzer [IRGA] vs. leaf porometer). We exposed
Populus tremula
,
Popolus tremuloides
and
Sambucus racemosa
to four different CO
2
concentrations over 126 days in experimental growth chambers at 350, 420, 490 and 560 ppm CO
2
; representing the years 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively (RCP4.5 scenario). Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO
2
concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO
2
. Under natural conditions, maximum operational
g
s
is often reached in the late morning to early afternoon, with a mid-day depression around noon. However, we showed that the daily maximum
g
s
can, in some species, shift later into the day when plants are exposed to only small increases (70 ppm) in CO
2
. A non-linear decreases in
g
s
and a shifting diurnal stomatal behavior under elevated CO
2
, could affect the long-term daily water and carbon budget of many plants in the future, and therefore alter soil–plant–atmospheric processes.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Conductance</subject><subject>Diurnal</subject><subject>Diurnal variations</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Gas analyzers</subject><subject>Growth chambers</subject><subject>Infrared analysis</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Stomata</subject><subject>Stomatal conductance</subject><issn>0032-0935</issn><issn>1432-2048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UUtv1DAQtlARXQp_oCdLnNOOn0l6qIRWLSBVKgc4W157tpsqsVPb24re-Od4SQXiwmlm9D1mNB8hpwzOGEB7ngEkVw1waEAIKZrnV2TFpOANB9kdkRVA7aEX6pi8zfkeoIJt-4YcC9Yr4B1bkZ9fRxsKTZjnGDJmWiL16Ky3I83OjkiH4BJOGEquLbVlinneYRocXd9y6mJwFUu2DDFc1HGabRrCHS1PkeYSJ1uqU2X5vSu2cmm20zweGBOWXfT5HXm9tWPG9y_1hHy_vvq2_tzc3H76sv540zipWGkc63TXeq42HqTnG2Ud-l5WTHW-b7cbqbnXDIVkHDvmUHRKq173qkPtWylOyOXiO-83E_rl6tHMaZhs-mGiHcy_SBh25i4-Gt1rBVJVgw8vBik-7DEXcx_3KdSbDa_fFxqUPqzhC8ulmHPC7Z8NDMwhNrPEZmps5nds5rmKxCLK8-F5mP5a_0f1C65rnPE</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Batke, Sven Peter</creator><creator>Yiotis, Charilaos</creator><creator>Elliott-Kingston, Caroline</creator><creator>Holohan, Aidan</creator><creator>McElwain, Jennifer</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1938-3625</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO2 concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods</title><author>Batke, Sven Peter ; Yiotis, Charilaos ; Elliott-Kingston, Caroline ; Holohan, Aidan ; McElwain, Jennifer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-c18687d25bd04d2b5aced9445158d97fb462d61e3412e81ce3856596958e6d743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Conductance</topic><topic>Diurnal</topic><topic>Diurnal variations</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Gas analyzers</topic><topic>Growth chambers</topic><topic>Infrared analysis</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Stomata</topic><topic>Stomatal conductance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batke, Sven Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiotis, Charilaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott-Kingston, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holohan, Aidan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElwain, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Planta</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batke, Sven Peter</au><au>Yiotis, Charilaos</au><au>Elliott-Kingston, Caroline</au><au>Holohan, Aidan</au><au>McElwain, Jennifer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO2 concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods</atitle><jtitle>Planta</jtitle><stitle>Planta</stitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>251</volume><issue>2</issue><artnum>52</artnum><issn>0032-0935</issn><eissn>1432-2048</eissn><abstract>Main conclusion
Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO
2
concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO
2
, representing the year 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively.
There are several lines of evidence suggesting that the vast majority of C3 plants respond to elevated atmospheric CO
2
by decreasing their stomatal conductance (
g
s
). However, in the majority of CO
2
enrichment studies, the response to elevated CO
2
are tested between plants grown under ambient (380–420 ppm) and high (538–680 ppm) CO
2
concentrations and measured usually at single time points in a diurnal cycle. We investigated
g
s
responses to simulated decadal increments in CO
2
predicted over the next 4 decades and tested how measurements of
g
s
may differ when two alternative sampling methods are employed (infrared gas analyzer [IRGA] vs. leaf porometer). We exposed
Populus tremula
,
Popolus tremuloides
and
Sambucus racemosa
to four different CO
2
concentrations over 126 days in experimental growth chambers at 350, 420, 490 and 560 ppm CO
2
; representing the years 1987, 2025, 2051, and 2070, respectively (RCP4.5 scenario). Our study demonstrated that the species respond non-linearly to increases in CO
2
concentration when exposed to decadal changes in CO
2
. Under natural conditions, maximum operational
g
s
is often reached in the late morning to early afternoon, with a mid-day depression around noon. However, we showed that the daily maximum
g
s
can, in some species, shift later into the day when plants are exposed to only small increases (70 ppm) in CO
2
. A non-linear decreases in
g
s
and a shifting diurnal stomatal behavior under elevated CO
2
, could affect the long-term daily water and carbon budget of many plants in the future, and therefore alter soil–plant–atmospheric processes.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31950281</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1938-3625</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-0935 |
ispartof | Planta, 2020-02, Vol.251 (2), Article 52 |
issn | 0032-0935 1432-2048 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6965045 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Online Journals Complete |
subjects | Agriculture Biology Biomedical and Life Sciences Carbon dioxide Conductance Diurnal Diurnal variations Ecology Experiments Exposure Forestry Gas analyzers Growth chambers Infrared analysis Life Sciences Original Original Article Physiology Plant Sciences Resistance Sampling Sampling methods Species Stomata Stomatal conductance |
title | Plant responses to decadal scale increments in atmospheric CO2 concentration: comparing two stomatal conductance sampling methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T18%3A36%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plant%20responses%20to%20decadal%20scale%20increments%20in%20atmospheric%20CO2%20concentration:%20comparing%20two%20stomatal%20conductance%20sampling%20methods&rft.jtitle=Planta&rft.au=Batke,%20Sven%20Peter&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=251&rft.issue=2&rft.artnum=52&rft.issn=0032-0935&rft.eissn=1432-2048&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00425-020-03343-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2343360564%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2343360564&rft_id=info:pmid/31950281&rfr_iscdi=true |