Crop residues exacerbate the negative effects of extreme flooding on soil quality
Extreme flood events are predicted to have a negative impact on soil quality. Currently, there is a lack of information about the effect of agricultural practices on soil functioning and microbial processes under these events. We hypothesized that the impact of flooding on soil quality will be exace...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biology and fertility of soils 2017-10, Vol.53 (7), p.751-765 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 765 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 751 |
container_title | Biology and fertility of soils |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Sánchez-Rodríguez, Antonio R. Hill, Paul W. Chadwick, David R. Jones, Davey L. |
description | Extreme flood events are predicted to have a negative impact on soil quality. Currently, there is a lack of information about the effect of agricultural practices on soil functioning and microbial processes under these events. We hypothesized that the impact of flooding on soil quality will be exacerbated when crop residues are present in the soil as they will induce more extreme anaerobicity. A spring extreme flood event (10 °C, 9 weeks) was simulated in mesocosms containing an arable sandy-loam soil low in nutrients. The main treatments were (1) with and without flooding and (2) with and without maize residue addition (8 Mg ha
−1
). We monitored changes in soil chemical quality indicators (e.g. pH, salinity, Fe
3+
, P, C, NH
4
+
, NO
3
−
and organic N), greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (CO
2
, CH
4
, N
2
O) and soil microbial community composition (PLFAs) during a prolonged flood period (9 weeks) and an 8-week “recovery” period after flooding. In comparison to the other treatments, flooding in the presence of crop residues resulted in a dramatic drop in soil redox potential. This was associated with the enhanced release of Fe and C into solution and an increase in CH
4
emissions. In contrast, maize residues reduced potential nitrate losses and N
2
O emissions, possibly due to complete denitrification and microbial N immobilization. Both flooding and maize residues stimulated microbial growth and promoted a shift in microbial community composition. Following floodwater removal, most of the soil quality indicators returned to the levels of the control treatment within 5 weeks. After this short recovery phase, no major impact of flooding could be observed on plant growth (maize pot-grown). Overall, we conclude that both extreme flooding and management regime negatively impact upon a range of soil quality indicators (e.g. redox, GHG emissions); however, the soil showed high resilience and recovered quickly after floodwater removal. Further work is required to investigate the impact of repeated extreme flood events on soil quality and function over longer timescales. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00374-017-1214-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6961515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2350371348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1d0e98b6ec5edb7b58180b9326a7479c42162a9535cbfd3c1f6aaaaa62f89fc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9rHCEUxaU0NNskH6AvRehLXybx6oyOL4Wy9B8ESqF5Fse5bgyz40ad0Hz7uGwS0kJ9UTi_e-69HkLeATsHxtRFZkyotmGgGuBQH6_IClrBG6Z6_ZqsqtA3XEl-TN7mfMMYdD3oN-RYcMa01HpFfq1T3NGEOYwLZop_rMM02IK0XCOdcWNLuEOK3qMrmUZfkZJwi9RPMY5h3tA40xzDRG8XO4Vyf0qOvJ0ynj3eJ-Tq65ff6-_N5c9vP9afLxvXKlYaGBnqfpDoOhwHNdTJejZowaVVrdKu5SC51Z3o3OBH4cBLuz-S-15714oT8ungu1uGLY4O55LsZHYpbG26N9EG87cyh2uziXdGagkddNXg46NBird1-WK2ITucJjtjXLLhoqvfC6LtK_rhH_QmLmmu6xnQQioJoteVggPlUsw5oX8eBpjZB2YOgZmai9kHZlitef9yi-eKp4QqwA9ArtK8wfSi9X9dHwB6RqII</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1936761389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crop residues exacerbate the negative effects of extreme flooding on soil quality</title><source>SpringerLink_现刊</source><creator>Sánchez-Rodríguez, Antonio R. ; Hill, Paul W. ; Chadwick, David R. ; Jones, Davey L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Rodríguez, Antonio R. ; Hill, Paul W. ; Chadwick, David R. ; Jones, Davey L.</creatorcontrib><description>Extreme flood events are predicted to have a negative impact on soil quality. Currently, there is a lack of information about the effect of agricultural practices on soil functioning and microbial processes under these events. We hypothesized that the impact of flooding on soil quality will be exacerbated when crop residues are present in the soil as they will induce more extreme anaerobicity. A spring extreme flood event (10 °C, 9 weeks) was simulated in mesocosms containing an arable sandy-loam soil low in nutrients. The main treatments were (1) with and without flooding and (2) with and without maize residue addition (8 Mg ha
−1
). We monitored changes in soil chemical quality indicators (e.g. pH, salinity, Fe
3+
, P, C, NH
4
+
, NO
3
−
and organic N), greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (CO
2
, CH
4
, N
2
O) and soil microbial community composition (PLFAs) during a prolonged flood period (9 weeks) and an 8-week “recovery” period after flooding. In comparison to the other treatments, flooding in the presence of crop residues resulted in a dramatic drop in soil redox potential. This was associated with the enhanced release of Fe and C into solution and an increase in CH
4
emissions. In contrast, maize residues reduced potential nitrate losses and N
2
O emissions, possibly due to complete denitrification and microbial N immobilization. Both flooding and maize residues stimulated microbial growth and promoted a shift in microbial community composition. Following floodwater removal, most of the soil quality indicators returned to the levels of the control treatment within 5 weeks. After this short recovery phase, no major impact of flooding could be observed on plant growth (maize pot-grown). Overall, we conclude that both extreme flooding and management regime negatively impact upon a range of soil quality indicators (e.g. redox, GHG emissions); however, the soil showed high resilience and recovered quickly after floodwater removal. Further work is required to investigate the impact of repeated extreme flood events on soil quality and function over longer timescales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0178-2762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0789</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00374-017-1214-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32009699</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agriculture ; Arable land ; Biogeochemistry ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carbon dioxide ; Communities ; Community composition ; Computer simulation ; Corn ; Crop residues ; Crops ; Denitrification ; Farm buildings ; Flood predictions ; Flooding ; Floods ; Floodwater ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Immobilization ; Indicators ; Iron ; Life Sciences ; Loam ; Loam soils ; Mesocosms ; Methane ; Mineral nutrients ; Nitrous oxide ; Nutrients ; Original Paper ; Oxidoreductions ; pH effects ; Plant growth ; Recovery ; Redox potential ; Removal ; Residues ; Sandy loam ; Sandy soils ; Soil ; Soil chemistry ; Soil fertility ; Soil investigations ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil quality ; Soil Science & Conservation</subject><ispartof>Biology and fertility of soils, 2017-10, Vol.53 (7), p.751-765</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017.</rights><rights>Biology and Fertility of Soils is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1d0e98b6ec5edb7b58180b9326a7479c42162a9535cbfd3c1f6aaaaa62f89fc43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1d0e98b6ec5edb7b58180b9326a7479c42162a9535cbfd3c1f6aaaaa62f89fc43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8734-2035</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00374-017-1214-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00374-017-1214-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32009699$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Rodríguez, Antonio R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadwick, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Davey L.</creatorcontrib><title>Crop residues exacerbate the negative effects of extreme flooding on soil quality</title><title>Biology and fertility of soils</title><addtitle>Biol Fertil Soils</addtitle><addtitle>Biol Fertil Soils</addtitle><description>Extreme flood events are predicted to have a negative impact on soil quality. Currently, there is a lack of information about the effect of agricultural practices on soil functioning and microbial processes under these events. We hypothesized that the impact of flooding on soil quality will be exacerbated when crop residues are present in the soil as they will induce more extreme anaerobicity. A spring extreme flood event (10 °C, 9 weeks) was simulated in mesocosms containing an arable sandy-loam soil low in nutrients. The main treatments were (1) with and without flooding and (2) with and without maize residue addition (8 Mg ha
−1
). We monitored changes in soil chemical quality indicators (e.g. pH, salinity, Fe
3+
, P, C, NH
4
+
, NO
3
−
and organic N), greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (CO
2
, CH
4
, N
2
O) and soil microbial community composition (PLFAs) during a prolonged flood period (9 weeks) and an 8-week “recovery” period after flooding. In comparison to the other treatments, flooding in the presence of crop residues resulted in a dramatic drop in soil redox potential. This was associated with the enhanced release of Fe and C into solution and an increase in CH
4
emissions. In contrast, maize residues reduced potential nitrate losses and N
2
O emissions, possibly due to complete denitrification and microbial N immobilization. Both flooding and maize residues stimulated microbial growth and promoted a shift in microbial community composition. Following floodwater removal, most of the soil quality indicators returned to the levels of the control treatment within 5 weeks. After this short recovery phase, no major impact of flooding could be observed on plant growth (maize pot-grown). Overall, we conclude that both extreme flooding and management regime negatively impact upon a range of soil quality indicators (e.g. redox, GHG emissions); however, the soil showed high resilience and recovered quickly after floodwater removal. Further work is required to investigate the impact of repeated extreme flood events on soil quality and function over longer timescales.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Arable land</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Farm buildings</subject><subject>Flood predictions</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Floodwater</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Immobilization</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Loam</subject><subject>Loam soils</subject><subject>Mesocosms</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Oxidoreductions</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Redox potential</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Sandy loam</subject><subject>Sandy soils</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil chemistry</subject><subject>Soil fertility</subject><subject>Soil investigations</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil quality</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><issn>0178-2762</issn><issn>1432-0789</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9rHCEUxaU0NNskH6AvRehLXybx6oyOL4Wy9B8ESqF5Fse5bgyz40ad0Hz7uGwS0kJ9UTi_e-69HkLeATsHxtRFZkyotmGgGuBQH6_IClrBG6Z6_ZqsqtA3XEl-TN7mfMMYdD3oN-RYcMa01HpFfq1T3NGEOYwLZop_rMM02IK0XCOdcWNLuEOK3qMrmUZfkZJwi9RPMY5h3tA40xzDRG8XO4Vyf0qOvJ0ynj3eJ-Tq65ff6-_N5c9vP9afLxvXKlYaGBnqfpDoOhwHNdTJejZowaVVrdKu5SC51Z3o3OBH4cBLuz-S-15714oT8ungu1uGLY4O55LsZHYpbG26N9EG87cyh2uziXdGagkddNXg46NBird1-WK2ITucJjtjXLLhoqvfC6LtK_rhH_QmLmmu6xnQQioJoteVggPlUsw5oX8eBpjZB2YOgZmai9kHZlitef9yi-eKp4QqwA9ArtK8wfSi9X9dHwB6RqII</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Sánchez-Rodríguez, Antonio R.</creator><creator>Hill, Paul W.</creator><creator>Chadwick, David R.</creator><creator>Jones, Davey L.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8734-2035</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Crop residues exacerbate the negative effects of extreme flooding on soil quality</title><author>Sánchez-Rodríguez, Antonio R. ; Hill, Paul W. ; Chadwick, David R. ; Jones, Davey L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1d0e98b6ec5edb7b58180b9326a7479c42162a9535cbfd3c1f6aaaaa62f89fc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Arable land</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Farm buildings</topic><topic>Flood predictions</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Floodwater</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Immobilization</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Loam</topic><topic>Loam soils</topic><topic>Mesocosms</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Oxidoreductions</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Redox potential</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Sandy loam</topic><topic>Sandy soils</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil chemistry</topic><topic>Soil fertility</topic><topic>Soil investigations</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil quality</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Rodríguez, Antonio R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Paul W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadwick, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Davey L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer_OA刊</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biology and fertility of soils</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sánchez-Rodríguez, Antonio R.</au><au>Hill, Paul W.</au><au>Chadwick, David R.</au><au>Jones, Davey L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crop residues exacerbate the negative effects of extreme flooding on soil quality</atitle><jtitle>Biology and fertility of soils</jtitle><stitle>Biol Fertil Soils</stitle><addtitle>Biol Fertil Soils</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>751</spage><epage>765</epage><pages>751-765</pages><issn>0178-2762</issn><eissn>1432-0789</eissn><abstract>Extreme flood events are predicted to have a negative impact on soil quality. Currently, there is a lack of information about the effect of agricultural practices on soil functioning and microbial processes under these events. We hypothesized that the impact of flooding on soil quality will be exacerbated when crop residues are present in the soil as they will induce more extreme anaerobicity. A spring extreme flood event (10 °C, 9 weeks) was simulated in mesocosms containing an arable sandy-loam soil low in nutrients. The main treatments were (1) with and without flooding and (2) with and without maize residue addition (8 Mg ha
−1
). We monitored changes in soil chemical quality indicators (e.g. pH, salinity, Fe
3+
, P, C, NH
4
+
, NO
3
−
and organic N), greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (CO
2
, CH
4
, N
2
O) and soil microbial community composition (PLFAs) during a prolonged flood period (9 weeks) and an 8-week “recovery” period after flooding. In comparison to the other treatments, flooding in the presence of crop residues resulted in a dramatic drop in soil redox potential. This was associated with the enhanced release of Fe and C into solution and an increase in CH
4
emissions. In contrast, maize residues reduced potential nitrate losses and N
2
O emissions, possibly due to complete denitrification and microbial N immobilization. Both flooding and maize residues stimulated microbial growth and promoted a shift in microbial community composition. Following floodwater removal, most of the soil quality indicators returned to the levels of the control treatment within 5 weeks. After this short recovery phase, no major impact of flooding could be observed on plant growth (maize pot-grown). Overall, we conclude that both extreme flooding and management regime negatively impact upon a range of soil quality indicators (e.g. redox, GHG emissions); however, the soil showed high resilience and recovered quickly after floodwater removal. Further work is required to investigate the impact of repeated extreme flood events on soil quality and function over longer timescales.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32009699</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00374-017-1214-0</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8734-2035</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0178-2762 |
ispartof | Biology and fertility of soils, 2017-10, Vol.53 (7), p.751-765 |
issn | 0178-2762 1432-0789 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6961515 |
source | SpringerLink_现刊 |
subjects | Agricultural practices Agriculture Arable land Biogeochemistry Biomedical and Life Sciences Carbon dioxide Communities Community composition Computer simulation Corn Crop residues Crops Denitrification Farm buildings Flood predictions Flooding Floods Floodwater Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Immobilization Indicators Iron Life Sciences Loam Loam soils Mesocosms Methane Mineral nutrients Nitrous oxide Nutrients Original Paper Oxidoreductions pH effects Plant growth Recovery Redox potential Removal Residues Sandy loam Sandy soils Soil Soil chemistry Soil fertility Soil investigations Soil microorganisms Soil quality Soil Science & Conservation |
title | Crop residues exacerbate the negative effects of extreme flooding on soil quality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A17%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crop%20residues%20exacerbate%20the%20negative%20effects%20of%20extreme%20flooding%20on%20soil%20quality&rft.jtitle=Biology%20and%20fertility%20of%20soils&rft.au=S%C3%A1nchez-Rodr%C3%ADguez,%20Antonio%20R.&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=751&rft.epage=765&rft.pages=751-765&rft.issn=0178-2762&rft.eissn=1432-0789&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00374-017-1214-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2350371348%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1936761389&rft_id=info:pmid/32009699&rfr_iscdi=true |