Missed opportunities for epilepsy surgery referrals in Bhutan: A cohort study

•24 % of patients in a Bhutanese cohort were appropriate for epilepsy surgery referral.•Surgical appropriateness and quality of life were inversely correlated in this cohort.•84 % of surgically appropriate patients were “very high” priorities for referral.•No patient with epilepsy in Bhutan has yet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epilepsy research 2020-01, Vol.159, p.106252-106252, Article 106252
Hauptverfasser: Ham, Andrew Siyoon, Nirola, Damber K., Ayub, Neishay, Tshering, Lhab, Dem, Ugyen, Jette, Nathalie, Dorji, Chencho, Mateen, Farrah J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 106252
container_issue
container_start_page 106252
container_title Epilepsy research
container_volume 159
creator Ham, Andrew Siyoon
Nirola, Damber K.
Ayub, Neishay
Tshering, Lhab
Dem, Ugyen
Jette, Nathalie
Dorji, Chencho
Mateen, Farrah J.
description •24 % of patients in a Bhutanese cohort were appropriate for epilepsy surgery referral.•Surgical appropriateness and quality of life were inversely correlated in this cohort.•84 % of surgically appropriate patients were “very high” priorities for referral.•No patient with epilepsy in Bhutan has yet to undergo epilepsy surgery.•The CASES algorithm was adapted for future use in lower-income settings. To quantify the missed opportunities for epilepsy surgery referral and operationalize the Canadian Appropriateness of Epilepsy Surgery (CASES) tool for use in a lower income country without neurologists. People with epilepsy were recruited from the Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital from 2014-2016. Each participant was clinically evaluated, underwent at least one standard EEG, and was invited to undergo a free 1.5 T brain MRI. Clinical variables required for CASES were operationalized for use in lower-income populations and entered into the free, anonymous website tool. There were 209 eligible participants (mean age 28.4 years, 56 % female, 179 with brain MRI data). Of the 179 participants with brain MRI, 43 (24.0 %) were appropriate for an epilepsy surgery referral, 21 (11.7 %) were uncertain, and 115 (64.3 %) were inappropriate for referral. Among the 43 appropriate referral cases, 36 (83.7 %) were “very high” and 7 (16.3 %) were “high” priorities for referral. For every unit increase in surgical appropriateness, quality of life (QoL) dropped by 2.3 points (p-value 1 antiepileptic drug prior to enrollment, 42 (61.8 %) were appropriate referrals, 14 (20.6 %) were uncertain, and 12 (17.6 %) were inappropriate. Approximately a quarter of Bhutanese epilepsy patients who completed evaluation in this national referral-based hospital should have been evaluated for epilepsy surgery, sometimes urgently. Surgical services for epilepsy are an emerging priority for improving global epilepsy care and should be scaled up through international partnerships and clinician support algorithms like CASES to avoid missed opportunities.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.106252
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6954951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0920121119304760</els_id><sourcerecordid>2327380449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d8849ab5bdb27e5feed4378a36587fd15e06395924078ceb3ecf5d031db822ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUclu2zAQJYIGjev0Fwoee5HLVSR7KGAHTVIgRi7tmZDIUUzDFlVSCuC_LxNn6ymnAWbeMngPIUzJghJaf9suYNjBkA8J8oIRasq6ZpKdoBnVilW1FuIDmhHDSEUZpWfoU85bQogiQnxEZ5xqrqliM7Reh5zB4zgMMY1TH8YAGXcxYRjCowXOU7qDdMAJOkip2WUcerzaTGPTf8dL7OKmMHEeJ384R6ddAcDnpzlHfy5__r64rm5ur35dLG8qJ5QZK6-1ME0rW98yBbID8IIr3fBaatV5KoHU3EjDBFHaQcvBddITTn2rGYOGz9GPo-4wtXvwDvqxPGaHFPZNOtjYBPv_pQ8bexfvbW2kMJIWga9PAin-nSCPdh-yg92u6SFO2TLOFNclLFOg-gh1KeZcQnixocQ-tGG39rUN-9CGPbZRqF_evvlCfI6_AFZHAJSw7gMkm12A3oEPCdxofQzvu_wD4DWjeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2327380449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Missed opportunities for epilepsy surgery referrals in Bhutan: A cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Ham, Andrew Siyoon ; Nirola, Damber K. ; Ayub, Neishay ; Tshering, Lhab ; Dem, Ugyen ; Jette, Nathalie ; Dorji, Chencho ; Mateen, Farrah J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ham, Andrew Siyoon ; Nirola, Damber K. ; Ayub, Neishay ; Tshering, Lhab ; Dem, Ugyen ; Jette, Nathalie ; Dorji, Chencho ; Mateen, Farrah J.</creatorcontrib><description>•24 % of patients in a Bhutanese cohort were appropriate for epilepsy surgery referral.•Surgical appropriateness and quality of life were inversely correlated in this cohort.•84 % of surgically appropriate patients were “very high” priorities for referral.•No patient with epilepsy in Bhutan has yet to undergo epilepsy surgery.•The CASES algorithm was adapted for future use in lower-income settings. To quantify the missed opportunities for epilepsy surgery referral and operationalize the Canadian Appropriateness of Epilepsy Surgery (CASES) tool for use in a lower income country without neurologists. People with epilepsy were recruited from the Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital from 2014-2016. Each participant was clinically evaluated, underwent at least one standard EEG, and was invited to undergo a free 1.5 T brain MRI. Clinical variables required for CASES were operationalized for use in lower-income populations and entered into the free, anonymous website tool. There were 209 eligible participants (mean age 28.4 years, 56 % female, 179 with brain MRI data). Of the 179 participants with brain MRI, 43 (24.0 %) were appropriate for an epilepsy surgery referral, 21 (11.7 %) were uncertain, and 115 (64.3 %) were inappropriate for referral. Among the 43 appropriate referral cases, 36 (83.7 %) were “very high” and 7 (16.3 %) were “high” priorities for referral. For every unit increase in surgical appropriateness, quality of life (QoL) dropped by 2.3 points (p-value &lt;0.001). Among the 68 patients who took &gt;1 antiepileptic drug prior to enrollment, 42 (61.8 %) were appropriate referrals, 14 (20.6 %) were uncertain, and 12 (17.6 %) were inappropriate. Approximately a quarter of Bhutanese epilepsy patients who completed evaluation in this national referral-based hospital should have been evaluated for epilepsy surgery, sometimes urgently. Surgical services for epilepsy are an emerging priority for improving global epilepsy care and should be scaled up through international partnerships and clinician support algorithms like CASES to avoid missed opportunities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-1211</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6844</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.106252</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31838172</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Asia ; Bhutan ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - surgery ; Cohort Studies ; Epilepsy ; Epilepsy - diagnostic imaging ; Epilepsy - surgery ; Female ; Health services ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Mental Health ; Middle Aged ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Referral and Consultation ; Seizures ; Seizures - diagnostic imaging ; Seizures - psychology ; Surgical services</subject><ispartof>Epilepsy research, 2020-01, Vol.159, p.106252-106252, Article 106252</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d8849ab5bdb27e5feed4378a36587fd15e06395924078ceb3ecf5d031db822ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d8849ab5bdb27e5feed4378a36587fd15e06395924078ceb3ecf5d031db822ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.106252$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31838172$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ham, Andrew Siyoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nirola, Damber K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayub, Neishay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tshering, Lhab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dem, Ugyen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jette, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorji, Chencho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateen, Farrah J.</creatorcontrib><title>Missed opportunities for epilepsy surgery referrals in Bhutan: A cohort study</title><title>Epilepsy research</title><addtitle>Epilepsy Res</addtitle><description>•24 % of patients in a Bhutanese cohort were appropriate for epilepsy surgery referral.•Surgical appropriateness and quality of life were inversely correlated in this cohort.•84 % of surgically appropriate patients were “very high” priorities for referral.•No patient with epilepsy in Bhutan has yet to undergo epilepsy surgery.•The CASES algorithm was adapted for future use in lower-income settings. To quantify the missed opportunities for epilepsy surgery referral and operationalize the Canadian Appropriateness of Epilepsy Surgery (CASES) tool for use in a lower income country without neurologists. People with epilepsy were recruited from the Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital from 2014-2016. Each participant was clinically evaluated, underwent at least one standard EEG, and was invited to undergo a free 1.5 T brain MRI. Clinical variables required for CASES were operationalized for use in lower-income populations and entered into the free, anonymous website tool. There were 209 eligible participants (mean age 28.4 years, 56 % female, 179 with brain MRI data). Of the 179 participants with brain MRI, 43 (24.0 %) were appropriate for an epilepsy surgery referral, 21 (11.7 %) were uncertain, and 115 (64.3 %) were inappropriate for referral. Among the 43 appropriate referral cases, 36 (83.7 %) were “very high” and 7 (16.3 %) were “high” priorities for referral. For every unit increase in surgical appropriateness, quality of life (QoL) dropped by 2.3 points (p-value &lt;0.001). Among the 68 patients who took &gt;1 antiepileptic drug prior to enrollment, 42 (61.8 %) were appropriate referrals, 14 (20.6 %) were uncertain, and 12 (17.6 %) were inappropriate. Approximately a quarter of Bhutanese epilepsy patients who completed evaluation in this national referral-based hospital should have been evaluated for epilepsy surgery, sometimes urgently. Surgical services for epilepsy are an emerging priority for improving global epilepsy care and should be scaled up through international partnerships and clinician support algorithms like CASES to avoid missed opportunities.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Bhutan</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - surgery</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Epilepsy</subject><subject>Epilepsy - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Epilepsy - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Seizures</subject><subject>Seizures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Seizures - psychology</subject><subject>Surgical services</subject><issn>0920-1211</issn><issn>1872-6844</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUclu2zAQJYIGjev0Fwoee5HLVSR7KGAHTVIgRi7tmZDIUUzDFlVSCuC_LxNn6ymnAWbeMngPIUzJghJaf9suYNjBkA8J8oIRasq6ZpKdoBnVilW1FuIDmhHDSEUZpWfoU85bQogiQnxEZ5xqrqliM7Reh5zB4zgMMY1TH8YAGXcxYRjCowXOU7qDdMAJOkip2WUcerzaTGPTf8dL7OKmMHEeJ384R6ddAcDnpzlHfy5__r64rm5ur35dLG8qJ5QZK6-1ME0rW98yBbID8IIr3fBaatV5KoHU3EjDBFHaQcvBddITTn2rGYOGz9GPo-4wtXvwDvqxPGaHFPZNOtjYBPv_pQ8bexfvbW2kMJIWga9PAin-nSCPdh-yg92u6SFO2TLOFNclLFOg-gh1KeZcQnixocQ-tGG39rUN-9CGPbZRqF_evvlCfI6_AFZHAJSw7gMkm12A3oEPCdxofQzvu_wD4DWjeQ</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Ham, Andrew Siyoon</creator><creator>Nirola, Damber K.</creator><creator>Ayub, Neishay</creator><creator>Tshering, Lhab</creator><creator>Dem, Ugyen</creator><creator>Jette, Nathalie</creator><creator>Dorji, Chencho</creator><creator>Mateen, Farrah J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Missed opportunities for epilepsy surgery referrals in Bhutan: A cohort study</title><author>Ham, Andrew Siyoon ; Nirola, Damber K. ; Ayub, Neishay ; Tshering, Lhab ; Dem, Ugyen ; Jette, Nathalie ; Dorji, Chencho ; Mateen, Farrah J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-d8849ab5bdb27e5feed4378a36587fd15e06395924078ceb3ecf5d031db822ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Bhutan</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - surgery</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Epilepsy</topic><topic>Epilepsy - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Epilepsy - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Seizures</topic><topic>Seizures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Seizures - psychology</topic><topic>Surgical services</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ham, Andrew Siyoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nirola, Damber K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayub, Neishay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tshering, Lhab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dem, Ugyen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jette, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorji, Chencho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateen, Farrah J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Epilepsy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ham, Andrew Siyoon</au><au>Nirola, Damber K.</au><au>Ayub, Neishay</au><au>Tshering, Lhab</au><au>Dem, Ugyen</au><au>Jette, Nathalie</au><au>Dorji, Chencho</au><au>Mateen, Farrah J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Missed opportunities for epilepsy surgery referrals in Bhutan: A cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Epilepsy research</jtitle><addtitle>Epilepsy Res</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>159</volume><spage>106252</spage><epage>106252</epage><pages>106252-106252</pages><artnum>106252</artnum><issn>0920-1211</issn><eissn>1872-6844</eissn><abstract>•24 % of patients in a Bhutanese cohort were appropriate for epilepsy surgery referral.•Surgical appropriateness and quality of life were inversely correlated in this cohort.•84 % of surgically appropriate patients were “very high” priorities for referral.•No patient with epilepsy in Bhutan has yet to undergo epilepsy surgery.•The CASES algorithm was adapted for future use in lower-income settings. To quantify the missed opportunities for epilepsy surgery referral and operationalize the Canadian Appropriateness of Epilepsy Surgery (CASES) tool for use in a lower income country without neurologists. People with epilepsy were recruited from the Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital from 2014-2016. Each participant was clinically evaluated, underwent at least one standard EEG, and was invited to undergo a free 1.5 T brain MRI. Clinical variables required for CASES were operationalized for use in lower-income populations and entered into the free, anonymous website tool. There were 209 eligible participants (mean age 28.4 years, 56 % female, 179 with brain MRI data). Of the 179 participants with brain MRI, 43 (24.0 %) were appropriate for an epilepsy surgery referral, 21 (11.7 %) were uncertain, and 115 (64.3 %) were inappropriate for referral. Among the 43 appropriate referral cases, 36 (83.7 %) were “very high” and 7 (16.3 %) were “high” priorities for referral. For every unit increase in surgical appropriateness, quality of life (QoL) dropped by 2.3 points (p-value &lt;0.001). Among the 68 patients who took &gt;1 antiepileptic drug prior to enrollment, 42 (61.8 %) were appropriate referrals, 14 (20.6 %) were uncertain, and 12 (17.6 %) were inappropriate. Approximately a quarter of Bhutanese epilepsy patients who completed evaluation in this national referral-based hospital should have been evaluated for epilepsy surgery, sometimes urgently. Surgical services for epilepsy are an emerging priority for improving global epilepsy care and should be scaled up through international partnerships and clinician support algorithms like CASES to avoid missed opportunities.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31838172</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.106252</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0920-1211
ispartof Epilepsy research, 2020-01, Vol.159, p.106252-106252, Article 106252
issn 0920-1211
1872-6844
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6954951
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Asia
Bhutan
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - surgery
Cohort Studies
Epilepsy
Epilepsy - diagnostic imaging
Epilepsy - surgery
Female
Health services
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Mental Health
Middle Aged
Quality of life
Quality of Life - psychology
Referral and Consultation
Seizures
Seizures - diagnostic imaging
Seizures - psychology
Surgical services
title Missed opportunities for epilepsy surgery referrals in Bhutan: A cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A06%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Missed%20opportunities%20for%20epilepsy%20surgery%20referrals%20in%20Bhutan:%20A%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Epilepsy%20research&rft.au=Ham,%20Andrew%20Siyoon&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=159&rft.spage=106252&rft.epage=106252&rft.pages=106252-106252&rft.artnum=106252&rft.issn=0920-1211&rft.eissn=1872-6844&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2019.106252&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2327380449%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2327380449&rft_id=info:pmid/31838172&rft_els_id=S0920121119304760&rfr_iscdi=true