Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates of various prostate biopsy methods for patients with prostate-specific antigen levels of 10.0 ng/mL in real-world practice
Purpose: Several strategies of prostate biopsy (PBx) have been introduced to improve prostate cancer (PCa) detection rates. However, studies comparing cancer detection rates (CDRs) according to biopsy methods in real-world practice are scarce. This study aimed to investigate CDRs according to the bi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Investigative and clinical urology 2020, 61(1), , pp.28-34 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose: Several strategies of prostate biopsy (PBx) have been introduced to improve prostate cancer (PCa) detection rates. However, studies comparing cancer detection rates (CDRs) according to biopsy methods in real-world practice are scarce. This study aimed to investigate CDRs according to the biopsy methods for patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) = 7 (3+4). Biopsy methods, VPC, age, prostate volume, and PSA were as- sociated with PCa detection. In the sub-analysis for initial biopsy, MR-TBx had no significant difference with sPBx, but had higher CDR than the other biopsy protocols. For repeat biopsy, VPC, rather than the biopsy method, was associated with CDR.
Conclusions: This study reaffirmed the efficacy of MR-TBx on CDR in real-world practice. In cases with barriers to performing magnetic resonance imaging, VPC might be useful for adjusting the optimal number of biopsy cores in repeat biopsy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2466-0493 2466-054X |
DOI: | 10.4111/icu.2020.61.1.28 |