Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Thermal Ablation: Long-term Results of An Italian Retrospective Multicenter Study

Despite resection being considered the treatment of choice for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), percutaneous thermal ablation can be an alternative treatment for patients unfit for surgery. Our aim was to compare long-term results of percutaneous sonographically-guided radiofrequency ablation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical and translational hepatology 2019-12, Vol.7 (4), p.287-292
Hauptverfasser: Giorgio, Antonio, Gatti, Pietro, Montesarchio, Luca, Santoro, Bruno, Dell'Olio, Andrea, Crucinio, Nicola, Coppola, Carmine, Scarano, Ferdinando, Biase, Fabio De, Ciracì, Emanuela, Semeraro, Stefano, Giorgio, Valentina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 292
container_issue 4
container_start_page 287
container_title Journal of clinical and translational hepatology
container_volume 7
creator Giorgio, Antonio
Gatti, Pietro
Montesarchio, Luca
Santoro, Bruno
Dell'Olio, Andrea
Crucinio, Nicola
Coppola, Carmine
Scarano, Ferdinando
Biase, Fabio De
Ciracì, Emanuela
Semeraro, Stefano
Giorgio, Valentina
description Despite resection being considered the treatment of choice for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), percutaneous thermal ablation can be an alternative treatment for patients unfit for surgery. Our aim was to compare long-term results of percutaneous sonographically-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with high-powered microwave ablation (MWSA) in treatment of ICC. Results of 71 ICC patients with 98 nodules treated with RFA (36 patients) or MWSA (35 patients) between January 2008 and June 2018 in 5 Interventional Ultrasound centers of Southern Italy were retrospectively reviewed. Cumulative overall survival curves were calculated with the Kaplan-Meyer method and differences with the log-rank test. Eleven possible factors affecting survival were analyzed. Overall survival of the entire series was 88%, 65%, 45% and 34% at 12, 36, 60 and 80 months, respectively. Patients treated with MWSA survived longer than patients treated with RFA ( < 0.005). The MWSA group with ICC nodules ≤3 cm or nodules up to 4 cm survived longer than the RFA group ( < 0.0005). In patients with nodules >4 cm, no significant difference was found. Disease-free survival and progression-free survival were better in the MWSA group compared to the RFA group ( < 0.005). Diameter of nodules and MWSA were independent factors predicting a better survival. No major complications were observed. MWSA is superior to RFA in treating ICC unfit for surgery, achieving better long-term survival in small (≤3 cm) ICC nodules as well as nodules up to 4 cm of neoplastic tumors and should replace RFA.
doi_str_mv 10.14218/JCTH.2019.00036
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wanfang_jour_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6943218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><wanfj_id>lcyzhgbzz_e201904002</wanfj_id><sourcerecordid>lcyzhgbzz_e201904002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9b16965a17ca36c471d5e130f1fe0bf2d5741e94adcb8adeb94a764f65412de83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1vEzEQtRCIVqV3TshHDmzw2PtlDkhRVGhQEBKEs-X1erOuvHawvUXJr8dpSgUnj8Zv3rx5D6HXQBZQUmjff1ltbxeUAF8QQlj9DF1SBqRoW-DPc01pVZAG-AW6jvEuQ6ACUnPyEl0w4FBVvL5E89qlIEe9l8kovBq9lW5nvJJBGecniaXr8XbUYZIWLzubYd59wBvvdkXKXfxdx9mmiP2Alw6vk7RGutxNwce9Vsnca_w1I4zSLg_gH2nuD6_Qi0HaqK8f3yv089PNdnVbbL59Xq-Wm0KVjKWCd1DzupLQKMlqVTbQVxoYGWDQpBtoXzUlaF7KXnWt7HWXy6Yuh7oqgfa6ZVfo45l3P3eT7k8SgrRiH8wkw0F4acT_P86MYufvRc1Lli3OBO_OBL-lG7Iz4s7PwWXJwqrDcdx1x6PQpwhISQjN8LeP-4L_NeuYxGSi0jabqv0cBWWsyicRwjOUnKEqGxWDHp5UAREP-YpTvuJELh7yzSNv_r3maeBvmuwPcVCjhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2335169009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Thermal Ablation: Long-term Results of An Italian Retrospective Multicenter Study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Giorgio, Antonio ; Gatti, Pietro ; Montesarchio, Luca ; Santoro, Bruno ; Dell'Olio, Andrea ; Crucinio, Nicola ; Coppola, Carmine ; Scarano, Ferdinando ; Biase, Fabio De ; Ciracì, Emanuela ; Semeraro, Stefano ; Giorgio, Valentina</creator><creatorcontrib>Giorgio, Antonio ; Gatti, Pietro ; Montesarchio, Luca ; Santoro, Bruno ; Dell'Olio, Andrea ; Crucinio, Nicola ; Coppola, Carmine ; Scarano, Ferdinando ; Biase, Fabio De ; Ciracì, Emanuela ; Semeraro, Stefano ; Giorgio, Valentina</creatorcontrib><description>Despite resection being considered the treatment of choice for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), percutaneous thermal ablation can be an alternative treatment for patients unfit for surgery. Our aim was to compare long-term results of percutaneous sonographically-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with high-powered microwave ablation (MWSA) in treatment of ICC. Results of 71 ICC patients with 98 nodules treated with RFA (36 patients) or MWSA (35 patients) between January 2008 and June 2018 in 5 Interventional Ultrasound centers of Southern Italy were retrospectively reviewed. Cumulative overall survival curves were calculated with the Kaplan-Meyer method and differences with the log-rank test. Eleven possible factors affecting survival were analyzed. Overall survival of the entire series was 88%, 65%, 45% and 34% at 12, 36, 60 and 80 months, respectively. Patients treated with MWSA survived longer than patients treated with RFA ( &lt; 0.005). The MWSA group with ICC nodules ≤3 cm or nodules up to 4 cm survived longer than the RFA group ( &lt; 0.0005). In patients with nodules &gt;4 cm, no significant difference was found. Disease-free survival and progression-free survival were better in the MWSA group compared to the RFA group ( &lt; 0.005). Diameter of nodules and MWSA were independent factors predicting a better survival. No major complications were observed. MWSA is superior to RFA in treating ICC unfit for surgery, achieving better long-term survival in small (≤3 cm) ICC nodules as well as nodules up to 4 cm of neoplastic tumors and should replace RFA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2225-0719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2310-8819</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14218/JCTH.2019.00036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31915596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China: Liver Unit and Interventional Ultrasound Unit,Athena Clinical Institute,Piedimonte Matese(CE),Italy%Internal Medicine Unit,Brindisi General Hospital,Brindisi,Italy%General Surgery Unit,Polla General Hospital,Polla(SA),Italy%Department of Radiology,Bisceglie Hospital-ASL BAT,Bisceglie,Italy%Gastroenterology Unit,Foggia General Hospital,Foggia,Italy%Department of Internal Medicine,Hepatology Interventional Unit,Gragnano Hospital,Gragnano(NA),Italy%Internal Medicine Unit,Ostuni Hospital,Ostuni(BR),Italy%Fondazione Policlinico A.Gemelli IRCCS,Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health,Largo A Gemelli,Roma,Italy</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical and translational hepatology, 2019-12, Vol.7 (4), p.287-292</ispartof><rights>2019 Authors.</rights><rights>Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2019 Authors. 2019</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9b16965a17ca36c471d5e130f1fe0bf2d5741e94adcb8adeb94a764f65412de83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9b16965a17ca36c471d5e130f1fe0bf2d5741e94adcb8adeb94a764f65412de83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/images/PeriodicalImages/lcyzhgbzz-e/lcyzhgbzz-e.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6943218/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6943218/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31915596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giorgio, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatti, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montesarchio, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoro, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dell'Olio, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crucinio, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coppola, Carmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarano, Ferdinando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biase, Fabio De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciracì, Emanuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semeraro, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giorgio, Valentina</creatorcontrib><title>Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Thermal Ablation: Long-term Results of An Italian Retrospective Multicenter Study</title><title>Journal of clinical and translational hepatology</title><addtitle>J Clin Transl Hepatol</addtitle><description>Despite resection being considered the treatment of choice for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), percutaneous thermal ablation can be an alternative treatment for patients unfit for surgery. Our aim was to compare long-term results of percutaneous sonographically-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with high-powered microwave ablation (MWSA) in treatment of ICC. Results of 71 ICC patients with 98 nodules treated with RFA (36 patients) or MWSA (35 patients) between January 2008 and June 2018 in 5 Interventional Ultrasound centers of Southern Italy were retrospectively reviewed. Cumulative overall survival curves were calculated with the Kaplan-Meyer method and differences with the log-rank test. Eleven possible factors affecting survival were analyzed. Overall survival of the entire series was 88%, 65%, 45% and 34% at 12, 36, 60 and 80 months, respectively. Patients treated with MWSA survived longer than patients treated with RFA ( &lt; 0.005). The MWSA group with ICC nodules ≤3 cm or nodules up to 4 cm survived longer than the RFA group ( &lt; 0.0005). In patients with nodules &gt;4 cm, no significant difference was found. Disease-free survival and progression-free survival were better in the MWSA group compared to the RFA group ( &lt; 0.005). Diameter of nodules and MWSA were independent factors predicting a better survival. No major complications were observed. MWSA is superior to RFA in treating ICC unfit for surgery, achieving better long-term survival in small (≤3 cm) ICC nodules as well as nodules up to 4 cm of neoplastic tumors and should replace RFA.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2225-0719</issn><issn>2310-8819</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1vEzEQtRCIVqV3TshHDmzw2PtlDkhRVGhQEBKEs-X1erOuvHawvUXJr8dpSgUnj8Zv3rx5D6HXQBZQUmjff1ltbxeUAF8QQlj9DF1SBqRoW-DPc01pVZAG-AW6jvEuQ6ACUnPyEl0w4FBVvL5E89qlIEe9l8kovBq9lW5nvJJBGecniaXr8XbUYZIWLzubYd59wBvvdkXKXfxdx9mmiP2Alw6vk7RGutxNwce9Vsnca_w1I4zSLg_gH2nuD6_Qi0HaqK8f3yv089PNdnVbbL59Xq-Wm0KVjKWCd1DzupLQKMlqVTbQVxoYGWDQpBtoXzUlaF7KXnWt7HWXy6Yuh7oqgfa6ZVfo45l3P3eT7k8SgrRiH8wkw0F4acT_P86MYufvRc1Lli3OBO_OBL-lG7Iz4s7PwWXJwqrDcdx1x6PQpwhISQjN8LeP-4L_NeuYxGSi0jabqv0cBWWsyicRwjOUnKEqGxWDHp5UAREP-YpTvuJELh7yzSNv_r3maeBvmuwPcVCjhw</recordid><startdate>20191228</startdate><enddate>20191228</enddate><creator>Giorgio, Antonio</creator><creator>Gatti, Pietro</creator><creator>Montesarchio, Luca</creator><creator>Santoro, Bruno</creator><creator>Dell'Olio, Andrea</creator><creator>Crucinio, Nicola</creator><creator>Coppola, Carmine</creator><creator>Scarano, Ferdinando</creator><creator>Biase, Fabio De</creator><creator>Ciracì, Emanuela</creator><creator>Semeraro, Stefano</creator><creator>Giorgio, Valentina</creator><general>Liver Unit and Interventional Ultrasound Unit,Athena Clinical Institute,Piedimonte Matese(CE),Italy%Internal Medicine Unit,Brindisi General Hospital,Brindisi,Italy%General Surgery Unit,Polla General Hospital,Polla(SA),Italy%Department of Radiology,Bisceglie Hospital-ASL BAT,Bisceglie,Italy%Gastroenterology Unit,Foggia General Hospital,Foggia,Italy%Department of Internal Medicine,Hepatology Interventional Unit,Gragnano Hospital,Gragnano(NA),Italy%Internal Medicine Unit,Ostuni Hospital,Ostuni(BR),Italy%Fondazione Policlinico A.Gemelli IRCCS,Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health,Largo A Gemelli,Roma,Italy</general><general>XIA &amp; HE Publishing Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>2B.</scope><scope>4A8</scope><scope>92I</scope><scope>93N</scope><scope>PSX</scope><scope>TCJ</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191228</creationdate><title>Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Thermal Ablation: Long-term Results of An Italian Retrospective Multicenter Study</title><author>Giorgio, Antonio ; Gatti, Pietro ; Montesarchio, Luca ; Santoro, Bruno ; Dell'Olio, Andrea ; Crucinio, Nicola ; Coppola, Carmine ; Scarano, Ferdinando ; Biase, Fabio De ; Ciracì, Emanuela ; Semeraro, Stefano ; Giorgio, Valentina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-9b16965a17ca36c471d5e130f1fe0bf2d5741e94adcb8adeb94a764f65412de83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giorgio, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gatti, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montesarchio, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santoro, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dell'Olio, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crucinio, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coppola, Carmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarano, Ferdinando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biase, Fabio De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciracì, Emanuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semeraro, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giorgio, Valentina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong</collection><collection>WANFANG Data Centre</collection><collection>Wanfang Data Journals</collection><collection>万方数据期刊 - 香港版</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>China Online Journals (COJ)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical and translational hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giorgio, Antonio</au><au>Gatti, Pietro</au><au>Montesarchio, Luca</au><au>Santoro, Bruno</au><au>Dell'Olio, Andrea</au><au>Crucinio, Nicola</au><au>Coppola, Carmine</au><au>Scarano, Ferdinando</au><au>Biase, Fabio De</au><au>Ciracì, Emanuela</au><au>Semeraro, Stefano</au><au>Giorgio, Valentina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Thermal Ablation: Long-term Results of An Italian Retrospective Multicenter Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical and translational hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Transl Hepatol</addtitle><date>2019-12-28</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>292</epage><pages>287-292</pages><issn>2225-0719</issn><eissn>2310-8819</eissn><abstract>Despite resection being considered the treatment of choice for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), percutaneous thermal ablation can be an alternative treatment for patients unfit for surgery. Our aim was to compare long-term results of percutaneous sonographically-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with high-powered microwave ablation (MWSA) in treatment of ICC. Results of 71 ICC patients with 98 nodules treated with RFA (36 patients) or MWSA (35 patients) between January 2008 and June 2018 in 5 Interventional Ultrasound centers of Southern Italy were retrospectively reviewed. Cumulative overall survival curves were calculated with the Kaplan-Meyer method and differences with the log-rank test. Eleven possible factors affecting survival were analyzed. Overall survival of the entire series was 88%, 65%, 45% and 34% at 12, 36, 60 and 80 months, respectively. Patients treated with MWSA survived longer than patients treated with RFA ( &lt; 0.005). The MWSA group with ICC nodules ≤3 cm or nodules up to 4 cm survived longer than the RFA group ( &lt; 0.0005). In patients with nodules &gt;4 cm, no significant difference was found. Disease-free survival and progression-free survival were better in the MWSA group compared to the RFA group ( &lt; 0.005). Diameter of nodules and MWSA were independent factors predicting a better survival. No major complications were observed. MWSA is superior to RFA in treating ICC unfit for surgery, achieving better long-term survival in small (≤3 cm) ICC nodules as well as nodules up to 4 cm of neoplastic tumors and should replace RFA.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pub>Liver Unit and Interventional Ultrasound Unit,Athena Clinical Institute,Piedimonte Matese(CE),Italy%Internal Medicine Unit,Brindisi General Hospital,Brindisi,Italy%General Surgery Unit,Polla General Hospital,Polla(SA),Italy%Department of Radiology,Bisceglie Hospital-ASL BAT,Bisceglie,Italy%Gastroenterology Unit,Foggia General Hospital,Foggia,Italy%Department of Internal Medicine,Hepatology Interventional Unit,Gragnano Hospital,Gragnano(NA),Italy%Internal Medicine Unit,Ostuni Hospital,Ostuni(BR),Italy%Fondazione Policlinico A.Gemelli IRCCS,Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health,Largo A Gemelli,Roma,Italy</pub><pmid>31915596</pmid><doi>10.14218/JCTH.2019.00036</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2225-0719
ispartof Journal of clinical and translational hepatology, 2019-12, Vol.7 (4), p.287-292
issn 2225-0719
2310-8819
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6943218
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Original
title Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Thermal Ablation: Long-term Results of An Italian Retrospective Multicenter Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T23%3A06%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wanfang_jour_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intrahepatic%20Cholangiocarcinoma%20and%20Thermal%20Ablation:%20Long-term%20Results%20of%20An%20Italian%20Retrospective%20Multicenter%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20and%20translational%20hepatology&rft.au=Giorgio,%20Antonio&rft.date=2019-12-28&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=292&rft.pages=287-292&rft.issn=2225-0719&rft.eissn=2310-8819&rft_id=info:doi/10.14218/JCTH.2019.00036&rft_dat=%3Cwanfang_jour_pubme%3Elcyzhgbzz_e201904002%3C/wanfang_jour_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2335169009&rft_id=info:pmid/31915596&rft_wanfj_id=lcyzhgbzz_e201904002&rfr_iscdi=true