Identifying Preanalytic and Postanalytic Laboratory Quality Gaps Using a Data Warehouse and Structured Multidisciplinary Process
The laboratory total testing process includes preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases, but most laboratory quality improvement efforts address the analytic phase. Expanding quality improvement to preanalytic and postanalytic phases via use of medical data warehouses, repositories that include...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) 2019-04, Vol.143 (4), p.518-524 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 524 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 518 |
container_title | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) |
container_volume | 143 |
creator | Raebel, Marsha A Quintana, LeeAnn M Schroeder, Emily B Shetterly, Susan M Pieper, Lisa E Epner, Paul L Bechtel, Laura K Smith, David H Sterrett, Andrew T Chorny, Joseph A Lubin, Ira M |
description | The laboratory total testing process includes preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases, but most laboratory quality improvement efforts address the analytic phase. Expanding quality improvement to preanalytic and postanalytic phases via use of medical data warehouses, repositories that include clinical, utilization, and administrative data, can improve patient care by ensuring appropriate test utilization. Cross-department, multidisciplinary collaboration to address gaps and improve patient and system outcomes is beneficial.
To demonstrate medical data warehouse utility for characterizing laboratory-associated quality gaps amenable to preanalytic or postanalytic interventions.
A multidisciplinary team identified quality gaps. Medical data warehouse data were queried to characterize gaps. Organizational leaders were interviewed about quality improvement priorities. A decision aid with elements including national guidelines, local and national importance, and measurable outcomes was completed for each gap.
Gaps identified included (1) test ordering; (2) diagnosis, detection, and documentation, and (3) high-risk medication monitoring. After examination of medical data warehouse data including enrollment, diagnoses, laboratory, pharmacy, and procedures for baseline performance, high-risk medication monitoring was selected, specifically alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, complete blood count, and creatinine testing among patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The test utilization gap was in monitoring timeliness (eg, >60% of patients had a monitoring gap exceeding the guideline recommended frequency). Other contributors to selecting this gap were organizational enthusiasm, regulatory labeling, and feasibility of a significant laboratory role in addressing the gap.
A multidisciplinary process facilitated identification and selection of a laboratory medicine quality gap. Medical data warehouse data were instrumental in characterizing gaps. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5858/arpa.2018-0093-OA |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6941735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A583693610</galeid><sourcerecordid>A583693610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-ef664a68aaea1faee41ee59e2289f1dd3af571c91a4577687b304a289d7b9f033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkl-LEzEUxYMobl39AL7IgCD7Mmv-TDKTF6Gs67pQaUUXH8PtzJ02SzqpSUbomx_djF2L-hSS_M7hnuQQ8pLRS9nI5i2EPVxyypqSUi3K5fwRmTFZiZIzJR-TGaVUlFo38ow8i_E-bzXn7Ck5E1RyqQWfkZ-3HQ7J9gc7bIpVQBjAHZJtCxi6YuVjOh0sYO0DJB8OxecRnE2H4gb2sbiLkxSK95Cg-AYBt36M-Fv_JYWxTWPArvg0umQ7G1u7d3aAbLIKvsUYn5MnPbiILx7Wc3L34frr1cdysby5vZovyraSTSqxV6oC1QAgsB4QK4YoNXLe6J51nYBe1qzVDCpZ16qp14JWkC-7eq17KsQ5eXf03Y_rHXZtTh3AmX2wuzyN8WDNvzeD3ZqN_2GUrlgtZDa4eDAI_vuIMZldjoPOwYA5seFMSlZppeuMvv4PvfdjyA-ZKU4ryRRlVabeHKkNODRbBJe20bsxWT9EM5eNUFooRjPIjmAbfIwB-9PUjJqpCGYqgpmKYKYimOU8a179Hfek-PPz4hdVWbKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2204516014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying Preanalytic and Postanalytic Laboratory Quality Gaps Using a Data Warehouse and Structured Multidisciplinary Process</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Raebel, Marsha A ; Quintana, LeeAnn M ; Schroeder, Emily B ; Shetterly, Susan M ; Pieper, Lisa E ; Epner, Paul L ; Bechtel, Laura K ; Smith, David H ; Sterrett, Andrew T ; Chorny, Joseph A ; Lubin, Ira M</creator><creatorcontrib>Raebel, Marsha A ; Quintana, LeeAnn M ; Schroeder, Emily B ; Shetterly, Susan M ; Pieper, Lisa E ; Epner, Paul L ; Bechtel, Laura K ; Smith, David H ; Sterrett, Andrew T ; Chorny, Joseph A ; Lubin, Ira M</creatorcontrib><description>The laboratory total testing process includes preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases, but most laboratory quality improvement efforts address the analytic phase. Expanding quality improvement to preanalytic and postanalytic phases via use of medical data warehouses, repositories that include clinical, utilization, and administrative data, can improve patient care by ensuring appropriate test utilization. Cross-department, multidisciplinary collaboration to address gaps and improve patient and system outcomes is beneficial.
To demonstrate medical data warehouse utility for characterizing laboratory-associated quality gaps amenable to preanalytic or postanalytic interventions.
A multidisciplinary team identified quality gaps. Medical data warehouse data were queried to characterize gaps. Organizational leaders were interviewed about quality improvement priorities. A decision aid with elements including national guidelines, local and national importance, and measurable outcomes was completed for each gap.
Gaps identified included (1) test ordering; (2) diagnosis, detection, and documentation, and (3) high-risk medication monitoring. After examination of medical data warehouse data including enrollment, diagnoses, laboratory, pharmacy, and procedures for baseline performance, high-risk medication monitoring was selected, specifically alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, complete blood count, and creatinine testing among patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The test utilization gap was in monitoring timeliness (eg, >60% of patients had a monitoring gap exceeding the guideline recommended frequency). Other contributors to selecting this gap were organizational enthusiasm, regulatory labeling, and feasibility of a significant laboratory role in addressing the gap.
A multidisciplinary process facilitated identification and selection of a laboratory medicine quality gap. Medical data warehouse data were instrumental in characterizing gaps.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9985</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0093-OA</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30525932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: College of American Pathologists</publisher><subject>Ambulatory care ; Analysis ; Aspartate ; Blood tests ; Collaboration ; Complete blood count ; Creatinine tests ; Data models ; Data processing ; Data warehouses ; Data Warehousing - methods ; Diabetes ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Drug therapy ; Drugstores ; Evidence-based medicine ; Health care delivery ; Health care information services ; Health promotion ; Humans ; Information systems ; Intervention ; Laboratories ; Laboratories - standards ; Laboratory Proficiency Testing - methods ; Medicine ; Objectives ; Patient care ; Patients ; Pharmacy ; Professionals ; Quality ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods ; Quality control ; Quality management ; Rheumatoid arthritis ; Rheumatology ; Training ; Warehouse stores</subject><ispartof>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 2019-04, Vol.143 (4), p.518-524</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 College of American Pathologists</rights><rights>Copyright College of American Pathologists Apr 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-ef664a68aaea1faee41ee59e2289f1dd3af571c91a4577687b304a289d7b9f033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-ef664a68aaea1faee41ee59e2289f1dd3af571c91a4577687b304a289d7b9f033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30525932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raebel, Marsha A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, LeeAnn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Emily B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetterly, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieper, Lisa E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epner, Paul L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechtel, Laura K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterrett, Andrew T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chorny, Joseph A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubin, Ira M</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying Preanalytic and Postanalytic Laboratory Quality Gaps Using a Data Warehouse and Structured Multidisciplinary Process</title><title>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)</title><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><description>The laboratory total testing process includes preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases, but most laboratory quality improvement efforts address the analytic phase. Expanding quality improvement to preanalytic and postanalytic phases via use of medical data warehouses, repositories that include clinical, utilization, and administrative data, can improve patient care by ensuring appropriate test utilization. Cross-department, multidisciplinary collaboration to address gaps and improve patient and system outcomes is beneficial.
To demonstrate medical data warehouse utility for characterizing laboratory-associated quality gaps amenable to preanalytic or postanalytic interventions.
A multidisciplinary team identified quality gaps. Medical data warehouse data were queried to characterize gaps. Organizational leaders were interviewed about quality improvement priorities. A decision aid with elements including national guidelines, local and national importance, and measurable outcomes was completed for each gap.
Gaps identified included (1) test ordering; (2) diagnosis, detection, and documentation, and (3) high-risk medication monitoring. After examination of medical data warehouse data including enrollment, diagnoses, laboratory, pharmacy, and procedures for baseline performance, high-risk medication monitoring was selected, specifically alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, complete blood count, and creatinine testing among patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The test utilization gap was in monitoring timeliness (eg, >60% of patients had a monitoring gap exceeding the guideline recommended frequency). Other contributors to selecting this gap were organizational enthusiasm, regulatory labeling, and feasibility of a significant laboratory role in addressing the gap.
A multidisciplinary process facilitated identification and selection of a laboratory medicine quality gap. Medical data warehouse data were instrumental in characterizing gaps.</description><subject>Ambulatory care</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aspartate</subject><subject>Blood tests</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Complete blood count</subject><subject>Creatinine tests</subject><subject>Data models</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Data warehouses</subject><subject>Data Warehousing - methods</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Drugstores</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Health care delivery</subject><subject>Health care information services</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laboratories - standards</subject><subject>Laboratory Proficiency Testing - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Patient care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Warehouse stores</subject><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkl-LEzEUxYMobl39AL7IgCD7Mmv-TDKTF6Gs67pQaUUXH8PtzJ02SzqpSUbomx_djF2L-hSS_M7hnuQQ8pLRS9nI5i2EPVxyypqSUi3K5fwRmTFZiZIzJR-TGaVUlFo38ow8i_E-bzXn7Ck5E1RyqQWfkZ-3HQ7J9gc7bIpVQBjAHZJtCxi6YuVjOh0sYO0DJB8OxecRnE2H4gb2sbiLkxSK95Cg-AYBt36M-Fv_JYWxTWPArvg0umQ7G1u7d3aAbLIKvsUYn5MnPbiILx7Wc3L34frr1cdysby5vZovyraSTSqxV6oC1QAgsB4QK4YoNXLe6J51nYBe1qzVDCpZ16qp14JWkC-7eq17KsQ5eXf03Y_rHXZtTh3AmX2wuzyN8WDNvzeD3ZqN_2GUrlgtZDa4eDAI_vuIMZldjoPOwYA5seFMSlZppeuMvv4PvfdjyA-ZKU4ryRRlVabeHKkNODRbBJe20bsxWT9EM5eNUFooRjPIjmAbfIwB-9PUjJqpCGYqgpmKYKYimOU8a179Hfek-PPz4hdVWbKg</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Raebel, Marsha A</creator><creator>Quintana, LeeAnn M</creator><creator>Schroeder, Emily B</creator><creator>Shetterly, Susan M</creator><creator>Pieper, Lisa E</creator><creator>Epner, Paul L</creator><creator>Bechtel, Laura K</creator><creator>Smith, David H</creator><creator>Sterrett, Andrew T</creator><creator>Chorny, Joseph A</creator><creator>Lubin, Ira M</creator><general>College of American Pathologists</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Identifying Preanalytic and Postanalytic Laboratory Quality Gaps Using a Data Warehouse and Structured Multidisciplinary Process</title><author>Raebel, Marsha A ; Quintana, LeeAnn M ; Schroeder, Emily B ; Shetterly, Susan M ; Pieper, Lisa E ; Epner, Paul L ; Bechtel, Laura K ; Smith, David H ; Sterrett, Andrew T ; Chorny, Joseph A ; Lubin, Ira M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-ef664a68aaea1faee41ee59e2289f1dd3af571c91a4577687b304a289d7b9f033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory care</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aspartate</topic><topic>Blood tests</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Complete blood count</topic><topic>Creatinine tests</topic><topic>Data models</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Data warehouses</topic><topic>Data Warehousing - methods</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Drugstores</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Health care delivery</topic><topic>Health care information services</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laboratories - standards</topic><topic>Laboratory Proficiency Testing - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Patient care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Warehouse stores</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raebel, Marsha A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, LeeAnn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Emily B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetterly, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieper, Lisa E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epner, Paul L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechtel, Laura K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterrett, Andrew T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chorny, Joseph A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubin, Ira M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raebel, Marsha A</au><au>Quintana, LeeAnn M</au><au>Schroeder, Emily B</au><au>Shetterly, Susan M</au><au>Pieper, Lisa E</au><au>Epner, Paul L</au><au>Bechtel, Laura K</au><au>Smith, David H</au><au>Sterrett, Andrew T</au><au>Chorny, Joseph A</au><au>Lubin, Ira M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying Preanalytic and Postanalytic Laboratory Quality Gaps Using a Data Warehouse and Structured Multidisciplinary Process</atitle><jtitle>Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>518</spage><epage>524</epage><pages>518-524</pages><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><eissn>1543-2165</eissn><abstract>The laboratory total testing process includes preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases, but most laboratory quality improvement efforts address the analytic phase. Expanding quality improvement to preanalytic and postanalytic phases via use of medical data warehouses, repositories that include clinical, utilization, and administrative data, can improve patient care by ensuring appropriate test utilization. Cross-department, multidisciplinary collaboration to address gaps and improve patient and system outcomes is beneficial.
To demonstrate medical data warehouse utility for characterizing laboratory-associated quality gaps amenable to preanalytic or postanalytic interventions.
A multidisciplinary team identified quality gaps. Medical data warehouse data were queried to characterize gaps. Organizational leaders were interviewed about quality improvement priorities. A decision aid with elements including national guidelines, local and national importance, and measurable outcomes was completed for each gap.
Gaps identified included (1) test ordering; (2) diagnosis, detection, and documentation, and (3) high-risk medication monitoring. After examination of medical data warehouse data including enrollment, diagnoses, laboratory, pharmacy, and procedures for baseline performance, high-risk medication monitoring was selected, specifically alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, complete blood count, and creatinine testing among patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The test utilization gap was in monitoring timeliness (eg, >60% of patients had a monitoring gap exceeding the guideline recommended frequency). Other contributors to selecting this gap were organizational enthusiasm, regulatory labeling, and feasibility of a significant laboratory role in addressing the gap.
A multidisciplinary process facilitated identification and selection of a laboratory medicine quality gap. Medical data warehouse data were instrumental in characterizing gaps.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>College of American Pathologists</pub><pmid>30525932</pmid><doi>10.5858/arpa.2018-0093-OA</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9985 |
ispartof | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 2019-04, Vol.143 (4), p.518-524 |
issn | 0003-9985 1543-2165 1543-2165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6941735 |
source | MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Ambulatory care Analysis Aspartate Blood tests Collaboration Complete blood count Creatinine tests Data models Data processing Data warehouses Data Warehousing - methods Diabetes Disease control Disease prevention Drug therapy Drugstores Evidence-based medicine Health care delivery Health care information services Health promotion Humans Information systems Intervention Laboratories Laboratories - standards Laboratory Proficiency Testing - methods Medicine Objectives Patient care Patients Pharmacy Professionals Quality Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods Quality control Quality management Rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatology Training Warehouse stores |
title | Identifying Preanalytic and Postanalytic Laboratory Quality Gaps Using a Data Warehouse and Structured Multidisciplinary Process |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T07%3A07%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20Preanalytic%20and%20Postanalytic%20Laboratory%20Quality%20Gaps%20Using%20a%20Data%20Warehouse%20and%20Structured%20Multidisciplinary%20Process&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20pathology%20&%20laboratory%20medicine%20(1976)&rft.au=Raebel,%20Marsha%20A&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=518&rft.epage=524&rft.pages=518-524&rft.issn=0003-9985&rft.eissn=1543-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.5858/arpa.2018-0093-OA&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA583693610%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2204516014&rft_id=info:pmid/30525932&rft_galeid=A583693610&rfr_iscdi=true |