Identifying Preanalytic and Postanalytic Laboratory Quality Gaps Using a Data Warehouse and Structured Multidisciplinary Process

The laboratory total testing process includes preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases, but most laboratory quality improvement efforts address the analytic phase. Expanding quality improvement to preanalytic and postanalytic phases via use of medical data warehouses, repositories that include...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) 2019-04, Vol.143 (4), p.518-524
Hauptverfasser: Raebel, Marsha A, Quintana, LeeAnn M, Schroeder, Emily B, Shetterly, Susan M, Pieper, Lisa E, Epner, Paul L, Bechtel, Laura K, Smith, David H, Sterrett, Andrew T, Chorny, Joseph A, Lubin, Ira M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 524
container_issue 4
container_start_page 518
container_title Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976)
container_volume 143
creator Raebel, Marsha A
Quintana, LeeAnn M
Schroeder, Emily B
Shetterly, Susan M
Pieper, Lisa E
Epner, Paul L
Bechtel, Laura K
Smith, David H
Sterrett, Andrew T
Chorny, Joseph A
Lubin, Ira M
description The laboratory total testing process includes preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases, but most laboratory quality improvement efforts address the analytic phase. Expanding quality improvement to preanalytic and postanalytic phases via use of medical data warehouses, repositories that include clinical, utilization, and administrative data, can improve patient care by ensuring appropriate test utilization. Cross-department, multidisciplinary collaboration to address gaps and improve patient and system outcomes is beneficial. To demonstrate medical data warehouse utility for characterizing laboratory-associated quality gaps amenable to preanalytic or postanalytic interventions. A multidisciplinary team identified quality gaps. Medical data warehouse data were queried to characterize gaps. Organizational leaders were interviewed about quality improvement priorities. A decision aid with elements including national guidelines, local and national importance, and measurable outcomes was completed for each gap. Gaps identified included (1) test ordering; (2) diagnosis, detection, and documentation, and (3) high-risk medication monitoring. After examination of medical data warehouse data including enrollment, diagnoses, laboratory, pharmacy, and procedures for baseline performance, high-risk medication monitoring was selected, specifically alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, complete blood count, and creatinine testing among patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The test utilization gap was in monitoring timeliness (eg, >60% of patients had a monitoring gap exceeding the guideline recommended frequency). Other contributors to selecting this gap were organizational enthusiasm, regulatory labeling, and feasibility of a significant laboratory role in addressing the gap. A multidisciplinary process facilitated identification and selection of a laboratory medicine quality gap. Medical data warehouse data were instrumental in characterizing gaps.
doi_str_mv 10.5858/arpa.2018-0093-OA
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6941735</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A583693610</galeid><sourcerecordid>A583693610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-ef664a68aaea1faee41ee59e2289f1dd3af571c91a4577687b304a289d7b9f033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkl-LEzEUxYMobl39AL7IgCD7Mmv-TDKTF6Gs67pQaUUXH8PtzJ02SzqpSUbomx_djF2L-hSS_M7hnuQQ8pLRS9nI5i2EPVxyypqSUi3K5fwRmTFZiZIzJR-TGaVUlFo38ow8i_E-bzXn7Ck5E1RyqQWfkZ-3HQ7J9gc7bIpVQBjAHZJtCxi6YuVjOh0sYO0DJB8OxecRnE2H4gb2sbiLkxSK95Cg-AYBt36M-Fv_JYWxTWPArvg0umQ7G1u7d3aAbLIKvsUYn5MnPbiILx7Wc3L34frr1cdysby5vZovyraSTSqxV6oC1QAgsB4QK4YoNXLe6J51nYBe1qzVDCpZ16qp14JWkC-7eq17KsQ5eXf03Y_rHXZtTh3AmX2wuzyN8WDNvzeD3ZqN_2GUrlgtZDa4eDAI_vuIMZldjoPOwYA5seFMSlZppeuMvv4PvfdjyA-ZKU4ryRRlVabeHKkNODRbBJe20bsxWT9EM5eNUFooRjPIjmAbfIwB-9PUjJqpCGYqgpmKYKYimOU8a179Hfek-PPz4hdVWbKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2204516014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying Preanalytic and Postanalytic Laboratory Quality Gaps Using a Data Warehouse and Structured Multidisciplinary Process</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Raebel, Marsha A ; Quintana, LeeAnn M ; Schroeder, Emily B ; Shetterly, Susan M ; Pieper, Lisa E ; Epner, Paul L ; Bechtel, Laura K ; Smith, David H ; Sterrett, Andrew T ; Chorny, Joseph A ; Lubin, Ira M</creator><creatorcontrib>Raebel, Marsha A ; Quintana, LeeAnn M ; Schroeder, Emily B ; Shetterly, Susan M ; Pieper, Lisa E ; Epner, Paul L ; Bechtel, Laura K ; Smith, David H ; Sterrett, Andrew T ; Chorny, Joseph A ; Lubin, Ira M</creatorcontrib><description>The laboratory total testing process includes preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases, but most laboratory quality improvement efforts address the analytic phase. Expanding quality improvement to preanalytic and postanalytic phases via use of medical data warehouses, repositories that include clinical, utilization, and administrative data, can improve patient care by ensuring appropriate test utilization. Cross-department, multidisciplinary collaboration to address gaps and improve patient and system outcomes is beneficial. To demonstrate medical data warehouse utility for characterizing laboratory-associated quality gaps amenable to preanalytic or postanalytic interventions. A multidisciplinary team identified quality gaps. Medical data warehouse data were queried to characterize gaps. Organizational leaders were interviewed about quality improvement priorities. A decision aid with elements including national guidelines, local and national importance, and measurable outcomes was completed for each gap. Gaps identified included (1) test ordering; (2) diagnosis, detection, and documentation, and (3) high-risk medication monitoring. After examination of medical data warehouse data including enrollment, diagnoses, laboratory, pharmacy, and procedures for baseline performance, high-risk medication monitoring was selected, specifically alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, complete blood count, and creatinine testing among patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The test utilization gap was in monitoring timeliness (eg, &gt;60% of patients had a monitoring gap exceeding the guideline recommended frequency). Other contributors to selecting this gap were organizational enthusiasm, regulatory labeling, and feasibility of a significant laboratory role in addressing the gap. A multidisciplinary process facilitated identification and selection of a laboratory medicine quality gap. Medical data warehouse data were instrumental in characterizing gaps.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9985</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0093-OA</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30525932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: College of American Pathologists</publisher><subject>Ambulatory care ; Analysis ; Aspartate ; Blood tests ; Collaboration ; Complete blood count ; Creatinine tests ; Data models ; Data processing ; Data warehouses ; Data Warehousing - methods ; Diabetes ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Drug therapy ; Drugstores ; Evidence-based medicine ; Health care delivery ; Health care information services ; Health promotion ; Humans ; Information systems ; Intervention ; Laboratories ; Laboratories - standards ; Laboratory Proficiency Testing - methods ; Medicine ; Objectives ; Patient care ; Patients ; Pharmacy ; Professionals ; Quality ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods ; Quality control ; Quality management ; Rheumatoid arthritis ; Rheumatology ; Training ; Warehouse stores</subject><ispartof>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976), 2019-04, Vol.143 (4), p.518-524</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 College of American Pathologists</rights><rights>Copyright College of American Pathologists Apr 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-ef664a68aaea1faee41ee59e2289f1dd3af571c91a4577687b304a289d7b9f033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-ef664a68aaea1faee41ee59e2289f1dd3af571c91a4577687b304a289d7b9f033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30525932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raebel, Marsha A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, LeeAnn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Emily B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetterly, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieper, Lisa E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epner, Paul L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechtel, Laura K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterrett, Andrew T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chorny, Joseph A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubin, Ira M</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying Preanalytic and Postanalytic Laboratory Quality Gaps Using a Data Warehouse and Structured Multidisciplinary Process</title><title>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</title><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><description>The laboratory total testing process includes preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases, but most laboratory quality improvement efforts address the analytic phase. Expanding quality improvement to preanalytic and postanalytic phases via use of medical data warehouses, repositories that include clinical, utilization, and administrative data, can improve patient care by ensuring appropriate test utilization. Cross-department, multidisciplinary collaboration to address gaps and improve patient and system outcomes is beneficial. To demonstrate medical data warehouse utility for characterizing laboratory-associated quality gaps amenable to preanalytic or postanalytic interventions. A multidisciplinary team identified quality gaps. Medical data warehouse data were queried to characterize gaps. Organizational leaders were interviewed about quality improvement priorities. A decision aid with elements including national guidelines, local and national importance, and measurable outcomes was completed for each gap. Gaps identified included (1) test ordering; (2) diagnosis, detection, and documentation, and (3) high-risk medication monitoring. After examination of medical data warehouse data including enrollment, diagnoses, laboratory, pharmacy, and procedures for baseline performance, high-risk medication monitoring was selected, specifically alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, complete blood count, and creatinine testing among patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The test utilization gap was in monitoring timeliness (eg, &gt;60% of patients had a monitoring gap exceeding the guideline recommended frequency). Other contributors to selecting this gap were organizational enthusiasm, regulatory labeling, and feasibility of a significant laboratory role in addressing the gap. A multidisciplinary process facilitated identification and selection of a laboratory medicine quality gap. Medical data warehouse data were instrumental in characterizing gaps.</description><subject>Ambulatory care</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aspartate</subject><subject>Blood tests</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Complete blood count</subject><subject>Creatinine tests</subject><subject>Data models</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Data warehouses</subject><subject>Data Warehousing - methods</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Drugstores</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Health care delivery</subject><subject>Health care information services</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laboratories - standards</subject><subject>Laboratory Proficiency Testing - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Patient care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Warehouse stores</subject><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkl-LEzEUxYMobl39AL7IgCD7Mmv-TDKTF6Gs67pQaUUXH8PtzJ02SzqpSUbomx_djF2L-hSS_M7hnuQQ8pLRS9nI5i2EPVxyypqSUi3K5fwRmTFZiZIzJR-TGaVUlFo38ow8i_E-bzXn7Ck5E1RyqQWfkZ-3HQ7J9gc7bIpVQBjAHZJtCxi6YuVjOh0sYO0DJB8OxecRnE2H4gb2sbiLkxSK95Cg-AYBt36M-Fv_JYWxTWPArvg0umQ7G1u7d3aAbLIKvsUYn5MnPbiILx7Wc3L34frr1cdysby5vZovyraSTSqxV6oC1QAgsB4QK4YoNXLe6J51nYBe1qzVDCpZ16qp14JWkC-7eq17KsQ5eXf03Y_rHXZtTh3AmX2wuzyN8WDNvzeD3ZqN_2GUrlgtZDa4eDAI_vuIMZldjoPOwYA5seFMSlZppeuMvv4PvfdjyA-ZKU4ryRRlVabeHKkNODRbBJe20bsxWT9EM5eNUFooRjPIjmAbfIwB-9PUjJqpCGYqgpmKYKYimOU8a179Hfek-PPz4hdVWbKg</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Raebel, Marsha A</creator><creator>Quintana, LeeAnn M</creator><creator>Schroeder, Emily B</creator><creator>Shetterly, Susan M</creator><creator>Pieper, Lisa E</creator><creator>Epner, Paul L</creator><creator>Bechtel, Laura K</creator><creator>Smith, David H</creator><creator>Sterrett, Andrew T</creator><creator>Chorny, Joseph A</creator><creator>Lubin, Ira M</creator><general>College of American Pathologists</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Identifying Preanalytic and Postanalytic Laboratory Quality Gaps Using a Data Warehouse and Structured Multidisciplinary Process</title><author>Raebel, Marsha A ; Quintana, LeeAnn M ; Schroeder, Emily B ; Shetterly, Susan M ; Pieper, Lisa E ; Epner, Paul L ; Bechtel, Laura K ; Smith, David H ; Sterrett, Andrew T ; Chorny, Joseph A ; Lubin, Ira M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-ef664a68aaea1faee41ee59e2289f1dd3af571c91a4577687b304a289d7b9f033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory care</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aspartate</topic><topic>Blood tests</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Complete blood count</topic><topic>Creatinine tests</topic><topic>Data models</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Data warehouses</topic><topic>Data Warehousing - methods</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Drugstores</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Health care delivery</topic><topic>Health care information services</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laboratories - standards</topic><topic>Laboratory Proficiency Testing - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Patient care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Warehouse stores</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raebel, Marsha A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintana, LeeAnn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Emily B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shetterly, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieper, Lisa E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epner, Paul L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechtel, Laura K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterrett, Andrew T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chorny, Joseph A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubin, Ira M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raebel, Marsha A</au><au>Quintana, LeeAnn M</au><au>Schroeder, Emily B</au><au>Shetterly, Susan M</au><au>Pieper, Lisa E</au><au>Epner, Paul L</au><au>Bechtel, Laura K</au><au>Smith, David H</au><au>Sterrett, Andrew T</au><au>Chorny, Joseph A</au><au>Lubin, Ira M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying Preanalytic and Postanalytic Laboratory Quality Gaps Using a Data Warehouse and Structured Multidisciplinary Process</atitle><jtitle>Archives of pathology &amp; laboratory medicine (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Pathol Lab Med</addtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>518</spage><epage>524</epage><pages>518-524</pages><issn>0003-9985</issn><issn>1543-2165</issn><eissn>1543-2165</eissn><abstract>The laboratory total testing process includes preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases, but most laboratory quality improvement efforts address the analytic phase. Expanding quality improvement to preanalytic and postanalytic phases via use of medical data warehouses, repositories that include clinical, utilization, and administrative data, can improve patient care by ensuring appropriate test utilization. Cross-department, multidisciplinary collaboration to address gaps and improve patient and system outcomes is beneficial. To demonstrate medical data warehouse utility for characterizing laboratory-associated quality gaps amenable to preanalytic or postanalytic interventions. A multidisciplinary team identified quality gaps. Medical data warehouse data were queried to characterize gaps. Organizational leaders were interviewed about quality improvement priorities. A decision aid with elements including national guidelines, local and national importance, and measurable outcomes was completed for each gap. Gaps identified included (1) test ordering; (2) diagnosis, detection, and documentation, and (3) high-risk medication monitoring. After examination of medical data warehouse data including enrollment, diagnoses, laboratory, pharmacy, and procedures for baseline performance, high-risk medication monitoring was selected, specifically alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, complete blood count, and creatinine testing among patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The test utilization gap was in monitoring timeliness (eg, &gt;60% of patients had a monitoring gap exceeding the guideline recommended frequency). Other contributors to selecting this gap were organizational enthusiasm, regulatory labeling, and feasibility of a significant laboratory role in addressing the gap. A multidisciplinary process facilitated identification and selection of a laboratory medicine quality gap. Medical data warehouse data were instrumental in characterizing gaps.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>College of American Pathologists</pub><pmid>30525932</pmid><doi>10.5858/arpa.2018-0093-OA</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9985
ispartof Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 2019-04, Vol.143 (4), p.518-524
issn 0003-9985
1543-2165
1543-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6941735
source MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Ambulatory care
Analysis
Aspartate
Blood tests
Collaboration
Complete blood count
Creatinine tests
Data models
Data processing
Data warehouses
Data Warehousing - methods
Diabetes
Disease control
Disease prevention
Drug therapy
Drugstores
Evidence-based medicine
Health care delivery
Health care information services
Health promotion
Humans
Information systems
Intervention
Laboratories
Laboratories - standards
Laboratory Proficiency Testing - methods
Medicine
Objectives
Patient care
Patients
Pharmacy
Professionals
Quality
Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods
Quality control
Quality management
Rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology
Training
Warehouse stores
title Identifying Preanalytic and Postanalytic Laboratory Quality Gaps Using a Data Warehouse and Structured Multidisciplinary Process
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T07%3A07%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20Preanalytic%20and%20Postanalytic%20Laboratory%20Quality%20Gaps%20Using%20a%20Data%20Warehouse%20and%20Structured%20Multidisciplinary%20Process&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20pathology%20&%20laboratory%20medicine%20(1976)&rft.au=Raebel,%20Marsha%20A&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=518&rft.epage=524&rft.pages=518-524&rft.issn=0003-9985&rft.eissn=1543-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.5858/arpa.2018-0093-OA&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA583693610%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2204516014&rft_id=info:pmid/30525932&rft_galeid=A583693610&rfr_iscdi=true