Value of Routine Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Assessment of Cochlear Implant Candidates
Background The selection of an appropriate imaging technique for assessment before cochlear implantation is critical for precise diagnosis and management. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for the diagnosis of several conditions, such as labyrinthitis ossificans, cochlear nerve deficien...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2019-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e6279-e6279 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e6279 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e6279 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Alzhrani, Farid Babkour, Alaa Almuhawas, Fida Sanosi, Abdulrahman |
description | Background The selection of an appropriate imaging technique for assessment before cochlear implantation is critical for precise diagnosis and management. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for the diagnosis of several conditions, such as labyrinthitis ossificans, cochlear nerve deficiency, and neoplasms, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) provides excellent details of the temporal bone. However, it remains unclear whether routine MRI provides any additional benefits over HRCT. Objectives To assess the added value of MRI as a screening tool for temporal bone abnormalities in cochlear implant candidates through comparisons of its findings with those of HRCT. Materials and method It is a retrospective analysis of preoperative HRCT and MR images in a tertiary referral center. A total of 308 patients who underwent MRI and HRCT examinations before cochlear implantation between 2013 and 2015 were included. Preoperative HRCT and MR images were screened for temporal bone abnormalities by a senior neurotologist and a neuroradiologist. Results HRCT detected inner ear deformities in 51 of the 308 (16.6%) subjects, whereas MRI revealed abnormalities in only 18 (5.8%) of subjects. HRCT detected the same inner abnormalities in 16 of the 18 (88.9%) subjects diagnosed by MRI, whereas it showed normal results for the remaining two subjects. MRI detected cochlear nerve aplasia/hypoplasia in 13 subjects, 11 of whom had associated inner ear deformities that were detected by HRCT. The MR images of nine subjects showed cochlear fibrosis, which was confirmed by HRCT in all nine subjects. Conclusion In this study, MRI did not exhibit significant additional benefits over HRCT, and its routine use for the preoperative assessment of CI candidates was not justified. However, MRI is warranted for subjects at an increased risk of cochlear nerve aplasia due to an inner ear deformity or a narrow internal auditory canal. The establishment of criteria that facilitate the performance of MRI only when absolutely needed will reduce healthcare costs, prevent unnecessary exposure to the risks associated with general anesthesia, and shorten delays before cochlear implantation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.6279 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6939976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2349113664</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-b5d854e9cef5c07ad491ea55f4d754ae7eaaaf3d5702862b534428ecb10e16d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1rGzEQxUVpaIKbU-9F0EuhONW3VpdCMP0IpCSEtFcx1s7aa3YlV9oN9L-vjNOQ9jTDzG8eb3iEvOHswlrtPoY541wujLDuBTkT3DTLhjfq5bP-lJyXsmOMcWYFs-wVOZXccd5YcUZ2P2GYkaaO3qV56iPS77CJOPWB3mFJEWJAejXCpo8b2qVMpy3S24xpjxmm_gHpZSlYyohxOqisUtgOCLne7AeosxXEtm9hwvKanHQwFDx_rAvy48vn-9W35fXN16vV5fUyCGen5Vq3jVboAnY6MAutchxB6061VitAiwDQyVZbJhoj1loqJRoMa86Qm9bKBfl01N3P6xHbUJ1lGPw-9yPk3z5B7__dxH7rN-nBGyeds6YKvH8UyOnXjGXyY18CDvUfTHPxQkplnBG1Lsi7_9BdmnOs71WqGufSGFWpD0cq5FRKxu7JDGf-EKM_xugPMVb67XP_T-zf0OQfio6bjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2349113664</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value of Routine Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Assessment of Cochlear Implant Candidates</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Alzhrani, Farid ; Babkour, Alaa ; Almuhawas, Fida ; Sanosi, Abdulrahman</creator><creatorcontrib>Alzhrani, Farid ; Babkour, Alaa ; Almuhawas, Fida ; Sanosi, Abdulrahman</creatorcontrib><description>Background The selection of an appropriate imaging technique for assessment before cochlear implantation is critical for precise diagnosis and management. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for the diagnosis of several conditions, such as labyrinthitis ossificans, cochlear nerve deficiency, and neoplasms, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) provides excellent details of the temporal bone. However, it remains unclear whether routine MRI provides any additional benefits over HRCT. Objectives To assess the added value of MRI as a screening tool for temporal bone abnormalities in cochlear implant candidates through comparisons of its findings with those of HRCT. Materials and method It is a retrospective analysis of preoperative HRCT and MR images in a tertiary referral center. A total of 308 patients who underwent MRI and HRCT examinations before cochlear implantation between 2013 and 2015 were included. Preoperative HRCT and MR images were screened for temporal bone abnormalities by a senior neurotologist and a neuroradiologist. Results HRCT detected inner ear deformities in 51 of the 308 (16.6%) subjects, whereas MRI revealed abnormalities in only 18 (5.8%) of subjects. HRCT detected the same inner abnormalities in 16 of the 18 (88.9%) subjects diagnosed by MRI, whereas it showed normal results for the remaining two subjects. MRI detected cochlear nerve aplasia/hypoplasia in 13 subjects, 11 of whom had associated inner ear deformities that were detected by HRCT. The MR images of nine subjects showed cochlear fibrosis, which was confirmed by HRCT in all nine subjects. Conclusion In this study, MRI did not exhibit significant additional benefits over HRCT, and its routine use for the preoperative assessment of CI candidates was not justified. However, MRI is warranted for subjects at an increased risk of cochlear nerve aplasia due to an inner ear deformity or a narrow internal auditory canal. The establishment of criteria that facilitate the performance of MRI only when absolutely needed will reduce healthcare costs, prevent unnecessary exposure to the risks associated with general anesthesia, and shorten delays before cochlear implantation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6279</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31911872</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Cochlear implants ; Language acquisition ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Meningitis ; Otolaryngology ; Pediatrics ; Speech ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2019-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e6279-e6279</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019, Alzhrani et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019, Alzhrani et al. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019, Alzhrani et al. 2019 Alzhrani et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6939976/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6939976/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31911872$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alzhrani, Farid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babkour, Alaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almuhawas, Fida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanosi, Abdulrahman</creatorcontrib><title>Value of Routine Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Assessment of Cochlear Implant Candidates</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Background The selection of an appropriate imaging technique for assessment before cochlear implantation is critical for precise diagnosis and management. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for the diagnosis of several conditions, such as labyrinthitis ossificans, cochlear nerve deficiency, and neoplasms, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) provides excellent details of the temporal bone. However, it remains unclear whether routine MRI provides any additional benefits over HRCT. Objectives To assess the added value of MRI as a screening tool for temporal bone abnormalities in cochlear implant candidates through comparisons of its findings with those of HRCT. Materials and method It is a retrospective analysis of preoperative HRCT and MR images in a tertiary referral center. A total of 308 patients who underwent MRI and HRCT examinations before cochlear implantation between 2013 and 2015 were included. Preoperative HRCT and MR images were screened for temporal bone abnormalities by a senior neurotologist and a neuroradiologist. Results HRCT detected inner ear deformities in 51 of the 308 (16.6%) subjects, whereas MRI revealed abnormalities in only 18 (5.8%) of subjects. HRCT detected the same inner abnormalities in 16 of the 18 (88.9%) subjects diagnosed by MRI, whereas it showed normal results for the remaining two subjects. MRI detected cochlear nerve aplasia/hypoplasia in 13 subjects, 11 of whom had associated inner ear deformities that were detected by HRCT. The MR images of nine subjects showed cochlear fibrosis, which was confirmed by HRCT in all nine subjects. Conclusion In this study, MRI did not exhibit significant additional benefits over HRCT, and its routine use for the preoperative assessment of CI candidates was not justified. However, MRI is warranted for subjects at an increased risk of cochlear nerve aplasia due to an inner ear deformity or a narrow internal auditory canal. The establishment of criteria that facilitate the performance of MRI only when absolutely needed will reduce healthcare costs, prevent unnecessary exposure to the risks associated with general anesthesia, and shorten delays before cochlear implantation.</description><subject>Cochlear implants</subject><subject>Language acquisition</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Meningitis</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1rGzEQxUVpaIKbU-9F0EuhONW3VpdCMP0IpCSEtFcx1s7aa3YlV9oN9L-vjNOQ9jTDzG8eb3iEvOHswlrtPoY541wujLDuBTkT3DTLhjfq5bP-lJyXsmOMcWYFs-wVOZXccd5YcUZ2P2GYkaaO3qV56iPS77CJOPWB3mFJEWJAejXCpo8b2qVMpy3S24xpjxmm_gHpZSlYyohxOqisUtgOCLne7AeosxXEtm9hwvKanHQwFDx_rAvy48vn-9W35fXN16vV5fUyCGen5Vq3jVboAnY6MAutchxB6061VitAiwDQyVZbJhoj1loqJRoMa86Qm9bKBfl01N3P6xHbUJ1lGPw-9yPk3z5B7__dxH7rN-nBGyeds6YKvH8UyOnXjGXyY18CDvUfTHPxQkplnBG1Lsi7_9BdmnOs71WqGufSGFWpD0cq5FRKxu7JDGf-EKM_xugPMVb67XP_T-zf0OQfio6bjw</recordid><startdate>20191203</startdate><enddate>20191203</enddate><creator>Alzhrani, Farid</creator><creator>Babkour, Alaa</creator><creator>Almuhawas, Fida</creator><creator>Sanosi, Abdulrahman</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191203</creationdate><title>Value of Routine Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Assessment of Cochlear Implant Candidates</title><author>Alzhrani, Farid ; Babkour, Alaa ; Almuhawas, Fida ; Sanosi, Abdulrahman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-b5d854e9cef5c07ad491ea55f4d754ae7eaaaf3d5702862b534428ecb10e16d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cochlear implants</topic><topic>Language acquisition</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Meningitis</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alzhrani, Farid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babkour, Alaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almuhawas, Fida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanosi, Abdulrahman</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alzhrani, Farid</au><au>Babkour, Alaa</au><au>Almuhawas, Fida</au><au>Sanosi, Abdulrahman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value of Routine Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Assessment of Cochlear Implant Candidates</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2019-12-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e6279</spage><epage>e6279</epage><pages>e6279-e6279</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Background The selection of an appropriate imaging technique for assessment before cochlear implantation is critical for precise diagnosis and management. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for the diagnosis of several conditions, such as labyrinthitis ossificans, cochlear nerve deficiency, and neoplasms, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) provides excellent details of the temporal bone. However, it remains unclear whether routine MRI provides any additional benefits over HRCT. Objectives To assess the added value of MRI as a screening tool for temporal bone abnormalities in cochlear implant candidates through comparisons of its findings with those of HRCT. Materials and method It is a retrospective analysis of preoperative HRCT and MR images in a tertiary referral center. A total of 308 patients who underwent MRI and HRCT examinations before cochlear implantation between 2013 and 2015 were included. Preoperative HRCT and MR images were screened for temporal bone abnormalities by a senior neurotologist and a neuroradiologist. Results HRCT detected inner ear deformities in 51 of the 308 (16.6%) subjects, whereas MRI revealed abnormalities in only 18 (5.8%) of subjects. HRCT detected the same inner abnormalities in 16 of the 18 (88.9%) subjects diagnosed by MRI, whereas it showed normal results for the remaining two subjects. MRI detected cochlear nerve aplasia/hypoplasia in 13 subjects, 11 of whom had associated inner ear deformities that were detected by HRCT. The MR images of nine subjects showed cochlear fibrosis, which was confirmed by HRCT in all nine subjects. Conclusion In this study, MRI did not exhibit significant additional benefits over HRCT, and its routine use for the preoperative assessment of CI candidates was not justified. However, MRI is warranted for subjects at an increased risk of cochlear nerve aplasia due to an inner ear deformity or a narrow internal auditory canal. The establishment of criteria that facilitate the performance of MRI only when absolutely needed will reduce healthcare costs, prevent unnecessary exposure to the risks associated with general anesthesia, and shorten delays before cochlear implantation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>31911872</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.6279</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2019-12, Vol.11 (12), p.e6279-e6279 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6939976 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Cochlear implants Language acquisition Magnetic resonance imaging Meningitis Otolaryngology Pediatrics Speech Tumors |
title | Value of Routine Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Assessment of Cochlear Implant Candidates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A59%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20of%20Routine%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging%20for%20the%20Preoperative%20Assessment%20of%20Cochlear%20Implant%20Candidates&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Alzhrani,%20Farid&rft.date=2019-12-03&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e6279&rft.epage=e6279&rft.pages=e6279-e6279&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.6279&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2349113664%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2349113664&rft_id=info:pmid/31911872&rfr_iscdi=true |