A Comparison of the Influence of Vegetation Cover on the Precision of an UAV 3D Model and Ground Measurement Data for Archaeological Investigations: A Case Study of the Lepelionys Mound, Middle Lithuania
The aim of this research was to conduct a comparative analysis of the precision of ground geodetic data versus the three-dimensional (3D) measurements from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), while establishing the impact of herbaceous vegetation on the UAV 3D model. Low (up to 0.5 m high) herbaceous ve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2019-12, Vol.19 (23), p.5303 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 23 |
container_start_page | 5303 |
container_title | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Česnulevičius, Algimantas Bautrėnas, Artūras Bevainis, Linas Ovodas, Donatas |
description | The aim of this research was to conduct a comparative analysis of the precision of ground geodetic data versus the three-dimensional (3D) measurements from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), while establishing the impact of herbaceous vegetation on the UAV 3D model. Low (up to 0.5 m high) herbaceous vegetation can impede the establishment of the anthropogenic roughness of the surface. The identification of minor surface alterations, which enables the determination of their anthropogenic origin, is of utmost importance in archaeological investigations. Vegetation cover is regarded as one of the factors influencing the identification of such minor forms of relief. The research was conducted on the Lepelionys Mound (Prienai District Municipality, Lithuania). Ground measurements were obtained using Trimble GPS, and UAV "Inspire 1" was used for taking aerial photographs. Following the data from the ground measurements and aerial photographs, large scale surface maps were drawn and the errors in the measurement of the position of the isolines were compared. The results showed that the largest errors in the positional measurements of fixed objects were conditioned by the height of grass. Grass with a height of up to 0.1 m resulted in discrepancies of up to 0.5 m, whereas grass that was up to 0.5 m high led to discrepancies up to 1.3 m high. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/s19235303 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6928854</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2322753332</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-4685775ce9d90463753d46ebbce691c0ec45f8d4224f24f6190ea6c44b06c6243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUtFqGzEQPEpLk6Z96A8UQV9SqFNJK8l3fQgYp00DNi20yauQdXu2gu7kSncGf2N-KnKdmKQg2JVmNDsDWxTvGT0DqOiXxCoOEii8KI6Z4GJUck5fPumPijcp3VLKAaB8XRwBKxnlTB4XdxMyDe3aRJdCR0JD-hWSq67xA3YWdw83uMTe9C7D07DBSHKzI_2KaF1y-1-mI9eTGwIXZB5q9Plek8sYhlzmaNIQscWuJxemN6QJkUyiXRkMPiydNT4P3GDq3fLfmPSVZFMmIfndD_X20dQM1-gzvE15Rhb-TOaurn0GXL8aTOfM2-JVY3zCdw_1pLj-_u3P9Mdo9vPyajqZjayg0I-EKuV4LC1WdUWFgrGEWihcLCyqilmKVsimrAXnoslHsYqiUVaIBVVWcQEnxfledz0sWqxtThaN1-voWhO3OhinnyOdW-ll2GhV8bKUO4HTB4EY_g45uW5dsui96TAMSXPgPLsC4Jn68T_qbRhil-NpLkFKBUKyzPq0Z9kYUorYHMwwqncrog8rkrkfnro_MB93Au4BfUe3pA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535563451</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of the Influence of Vegetation Cover on the Precision of an UAV 3D Model and Ground Measurement Data for Archaeological Investigations: A Case Study of the Lepelionys Mound, Middle Lithuania</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Česnulevičius, Algimantas ; Bautrėnas, Artūras ; Bevainis, Linas ; Ovodas, Donatas</creator><creatorcontrib>Česnulevičius, Algimantas ; Bautrėnas, Artūras ; Bevainis, Linas ; Ovodas, Donatas</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this research was to conduct a comparative analysis of the precision of ground geodetic data versus the three-dimensional (3D) measurements from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), while establishing the impact of herbaceous vegetation on the UAV 3D model. Low (up to 0.5 m high) herbaceous vegetation can impede the establishment of the anthropogenic roughness of the surface. The identification of minor surface alterations, which enables the determination of their anthropogenic origin, is of utmost importance in archaeological investigations. Vegetation cover is regarded as one of the factors influencing the identification of such minor forms of relief. The research was conducted on the Lepelionys Mound (Prienai District Municipality, Lithuania). Ground measurements were obtained using Trimble GPS, and UAV "Inspire 1" was used for taking aerial photographs. Following the data from the ground measurements and aerial photographs, large scale surface maps were drawn and the errors in the measurement of the position of the isolines were compared. The results showed that the largest errors in the positional measurements of fixed objects were conditioned by the height of grass. Grass with a height of up to 0.1 m resulted in discrepancies of up to 0.5 m, whereas grass that was up to 0.5 m high led to discrepancies up to 1.3 m high.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-8220</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/s19235303</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31810215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>20th century ; Accuracy ; Aerial photography ; Altitude ; Archaeology ; Cameras ; Drones ; Fixed objects ; Grasses ; Historic buildings & sites ; Human influences ; Photogrammetry ; Position measurement ; Topography ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019-12, Vol.19 (23), p.5303</ispartof><rights>2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 by the authors. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-4685775ce9d90463753d46ebbce691c0ec45f8d4224f24f6190ea6c44b06c6243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-4685775ce9d90463753d46ebbce691c0ec45f8d4224f24f6190ea6c44b06c6243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928854/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6928854/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31810215$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Česnulevičius, Algimantas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bautrėnas, Artūras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevainis, Linas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ovodas, Donatas</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of the Influence of Vegetation Cover on the Precision of an UAV 3D Model and Ground Measurement Data for Archaeological Investigations: A Case Study of the Lepelionys Mound, Middle Lithuania</title><title>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><description>The aim of this research was to conduct a comparative analysis of the precision of ground geodetic data versus the three-dimensional (3D) measurements from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), while establishing the impact of herbaceous vegetation on the UAV 3D model. Low (up to 0.5 m high) herbaceous vegetation can impede the establishment of the anthropogenic roughness of the surface. The identification of minor surface alterations, which enables the determination of their anthropogenic origin, is of utmost importance in archaeological investigations. Vegetation cover is regarded as one of the factors influencing the identification of such minor forms of relief. The research was conducted on the Lepelionys Mound (Prienai District Municipality, Lithuania). Ground measurements were obtained using Trimble GPS, and UAV "Inspire 1" was used for taking aerial photographs. Following the data from the ground measurements and aerial photographs, large scale surface maps were drawn and the errors in the measurement of the position of the isolines were compared. The results showed that the largest errors in the positional measurements of fixed objects were conditioned by the height of grass. Grass with a height of up to 0.1 m resulted in discrepancies of up to 0.5 m, whereas grass that was up to 0.5 m high led to discrepancies up to 1.3 m high.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aerial photography</subject><subject>Altitude</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Drones</subject><subject>Fixed objects</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Historic buildings & sites</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Photogrammetry</subject><subject>Position measurement</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>1424-8220</issn><issn>1424-8220</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUtFqGzEQPEpLk6Z96A8UQV9SqFNJK8l3fQgYp00DNi20yauQdXu2gu7kSncGf2N-KnKdmKQg2JVmNDsDWxTvGT0DqOiXxCoOEii8KI6Z4GJUck5fPumPijcp3VLKAaB8XRwBKxnlTB4XdxMyDe3aRJdCR0JD-hWSq67xA3YWdw83uMTe9C7D07DBSHKzI_2KaF1y-1-mI9eTGwIXZB5q9Plek8sYhlzmaNIQscWuJxemN6QJkUyiXRkMPiydNT4P3GDq3fLfmPSVZFMmIfndD_X20dQM1-gzvE15Rhb-TOaurn0GXL8aTOfM2-JVY3zCdw_1pLj-_u3P9Mdo9vPyajqZjayg0I-EKuV4LC1WdUWFgrGEWihcLCyqilmKVsimrAXnoslHsYqiUVaIBVVWcQEnxfledz0sWqxtThaN1-voWhO3OhinnyOdW-ll2GhV8bKUO4HTB4EY_g45uW5dsui96TAMSXPgPLsC4Jn68T_qbRhil-NpLkFKBUKyzPq0Z9kYUorYHMwwqncrog8rkrkfnro_MB93Au4BfUe3pA</recordid><startdate>20191202</startdate><enddate>20191202</enddate><creator>Česnulevičius, Algimantas</creator><creator>Bautrėnas, Artūras</creator><creator>Bevainis, Linas</creator><creator>Ovodas, Donatas</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191202</creationdate><title>A Comparison of the Influence of Vegetation Cover on the Precision of an UAV 3D Model and Ground Measurement Data for Archaeological Investigations: A Case Study of the Lepelionys Mound, Middle Lithuania</title><author>Česnulevičius, Algimantas ; Bautrėnas, Artūras ; Bevainis, Linas ; Ovodas, Donatas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-4685775ce9d90463753d46ebbce691c0ec45f8d4224f24f6190ea6c44b06c6243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aerial photography</topic><topic>Altitude</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Drones</topic><topic>Fixed objects</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Historic buildings & sites</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Photogrammetry</topic><topic>Position measurement</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Česnulevičius, Algimantas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bautrėnas, Artūras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevainis, Linas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ovodas, Donatas</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Česnulevičius, Algimantas</au><au>Bautrėnas, Artūras</au><au>Bevainis, Linas</au><au>Ovodas, Donatas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of the Influence of Vegetation Cover on the Precision of an UAV 3D Model and Ground Measurement Data for Archaeological Investigations: A Case Study of the Lepelionys Mound, Middle Lithuania</atitle><jtitle>Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><addtitle>Sensors (Basel)</addtitle><date>2019-12-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>5303</spage><pages>5303-</pages><issn>1424-8220</issn><eissn>1424-8220</eissn><abstract>The aim of this research was to conduct a comparative analysis of the precision of ground geodetic data versus the three-dimensional (3D) measurements from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), while establishing the impact of herbaceous vegetation on the UAV 3D model. Low (up to 0.5 m high) herbaceous vegetation can impede the establishment of the anthropogenic roughness of the surface. The identification of minor surface alterations, which enables the determination of their anthropogenic origin, is of utmost importance in archaeological investigations. Vegetation cover is regarded as one of the factors influencing the identification of such minor forms of relief. The research was conducted on the Lepelionys Mound (Prienai District Municipality, Lithuania). Ground measurements were obtained using Trimble GPS, and UAV "Inspire 1" was used for taking aerial photographs. Following the data from the ground measurements and aerial photographs, large scale surface maps were drawn and the errors in the measurement of the position of the isolines were compared. The results showed that the largest errors in the positional measurements of fixed objects were conditioned by the height of grass. Grass with a height of up to 0.1 m resulted in discrepancies of up to 0.5 m, whereas grass that was up to 0.5 m high led to discrepancies up to 1.3 m high.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>31810215</pmid><doi>10.3390/s19235303</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1424-8220 |
ispartof | Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019-12, Vol.19 (23), p.5303 |
issn | 1424-8220 1424-8220 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6928854 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | 20th century Accuracy Aerial photography Altitude Archaeology Cameras Drones Fixed objects Grasses Historic buildings & sites Human influences Photogrammetry Position measurement Topography Unmanned aerial vehicles Vegetation |
title | A Comparison of the Influence of Vegetation Cover on the Precision of an UAV 3D Model and Ground Measurement Data for Archaeological Investigations: A Case Study of the Lepelionys Mound, Middle Lithuania |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A00%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20the%20Influence%20of%20Vegetation%20Cover%20on%20the%20Precision%20of%20an%20UAV%203D%20Model%20and%20Ground%20Measurement%20Data%20for%20Archaeological%20Investigations:%20A%20Case%20Study%20of%20the%20Lepelionys%20Mound,%20Middle%20Lithuania&rft.jtitle=Sensors%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=%C4%8Cesnulevi%C4%8Dius,%20Algimantas&rft.date=2019-12-02&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=5303&rft.pages=5303-&rft.issn=1424-8220&rft.eissn=1424-8220&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/s19235303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2322753332%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535563451&rft_id=info:pmid/31810215&rfr_iscdi=true |