Sex/Gender Differences in the Association between Residential Green Space and Self-Rated Health-A Sex/Gender-Focused Systematic Review
Though sex/gender is an important social determinant of health, sex/gender inequalities have not been considered comprehensively in environmental health research thus far. The aim of this systematic review was to clarify whether sex/gender theoretical concepts were addressed in studies on the impact...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2019-11, Vol.16 (23), p.4818 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 23 |
| container_start_page | 4818 |
| container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Bolte, Gabriele Nanninga, Sarah Dandolo, Lisa |
| description | Though sex/gender is an important social determinant of health, sex/gender inequalities have not been considered comprehensively in environmental health research thus far. The aim of this systematic review was to clarify whether sex/gender theoretical concepts were addressed in studies on the impact of residential green space on self-rated health and whether effect modification by sex/gender was observed. Three electronic databases were searched to identify epidemiological studies on perceived or objective residential green/blue space and self-rated health. Necessary for study inclusion was mentioning at least one keyword for sex/gender in title or abstract, adult study participants and data on self-rated health and on availability and/or use of green/blue spaces. Decisive for study inclusion was consideration of sex/gender differences in the impact of perceived or objective residential green/blue spaces on self-rated health in the analysis and presentation of results. Seven studies were included. They presented an overall positive impact of green space on self-rated health. No consistent sex/gender differences in the impact of green space on self-rated health were found in these studies. However, all studies used a binary operationalization male/female without further theoretical foundation. Research quality could be enhanced by integrating sex/gender-theoretical concepts into study design and interpretation of results. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph16234818 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6926795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2322137979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-85edfe9f702e444d0097e06cee8d21fdc27a7f1a7ea90f88a14bb23bac992a473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctuEzEYhS1ERUthyxJZYsNmWl8mvmyQotKmlSohNbC2PPZv4mjiCbanlxfguZmopbeVLf-fP_voIPSJkiPONTmOa8jbFRWMt4qqN-iACkGaVhD69tl-H70vZU0IV63Q79A-p4pQRvUB-ruE2-MFJA8Zf48hQIbkoOCYcF0BnpcyuGhrHBLuoN4AJHwFJXpINdoeL_LuZLm1DrBNHi-hD82VreDxOdi-rpo5fnqhORvcWKbZ8q5U2ExaN9muI9x8QHvB9gU-PqyH6NfZ6c-T8-byx-LiZH7ZuJaq2qgZ-AA6SMKgbVtPiJZAhANQntHgHZNWBmolWE2CUpa2Xcd4Z53WzLaSH6Jv997t2G3AuylGtr3Z5rix-c4MNpqXkxRX5vdwbYRmQurZJPj6IMjDnxFKNZtYHPS9TTCMxTDOGOVSSz2hX16h62HMaYq3o_RMCzITE3V0T7k8lJIhPH6GErOr2LyseLrw-XmER_x_p_wfjumlRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2329596056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex/Gender Differences in the Association between Residential Green Space and Self-Rated Health-A Sex/Gender-Focused Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Bolte, Gabriele ; Nanninga, Sarah ; Dandolo, Lisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Bolte, Gabriele ; Nanninga, Sarah ; Dandolo, Lisa</creatorcontrib><description>Though sex/gender is an important social determinant of health, sex/gender inequalities have not been considered comprehensively in environmental health research thus far. The aim of this systematic review was to clarify whether sex/gender theoretical concepts were addressed in studies on the impact of residential green space on self-rated health and whether effect modification by sex/gender was observed. Three electronic databases were searched to identify epidemiological studies on perceived or objective residential green/blue space and self-rated health. Necessary for study inclusion was mentioning at least one keyword for sex/gender in title or abstract, adult study participants and data on self-rated health and on availability and/or use of green/blue spaces. Decisive for study inclusion was consideration of sex/gender differences in the impact of perceived or objective residential green/blue spaces on self-rated health in the analysis and presentation of results. Seven studies were included. They presented an overall positive impact of green space on self-rated health. No consistent sex/gender differences in the impact of green space on self-rated health were found in these studies. However, all studies used a binary operationalization male/female without further theoretical foundation. Research quality could be enhanced by integrating sex/gender-theoretical concepts into study design and interpretation of results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16234818</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31801219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Environment ; Environmental health ; Epidemiology ; Exposure ; Females ; Gender ; Gender differences ; Gender Identity ; Health Status ; Humans ; Males ; Medical research ; Public health ; Quality ; Residence Characteristics ; Review ; Reviews ; Self Report ; Sex differences ; Sex Factors ; Sex linkage ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Studies ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019-11, Vol.16 (23), p.4818</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 by the authors. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-85edfe9f702e444d0097e06cee8d21fdc27a7f1a7ea90f88a14bb23bac992a473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-85edfe9f702e444d0097e06cee8d21fdc27a7f1a7ea90f88a14bb23bac992a473</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0269-5059</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926795/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926795/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31801219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bolte, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanninga, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dandolo, Lisa</creatorcontrib><title>Sex/Gender Differences in the Association between Residential Green Space and Self-Rated Health-A Sex/Gender-Focused Systematic Review</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>Though sex/gender is an important social determinant of health, sex/gender inequalities have not been considered comprehensively in environmental health research thus far. The aim of this systematic review was to clarify whether sex/gender theoretical concepts were addressed in studies on the impact of residential green space on self-rated health and whether effect modification by sex/gender was observed. Three electronic databases were searched to identify epidemiological studies on perceived or objective residential green/blue space and self-rated health. Necessary for study inclusion was mentioning at least one keyword for sex/gender in title or abstract, adult study participants and data on self-rated health and on availability and/or use of green/blue spaces. Decisive for study inclusion was consideration of sex/gender differences in the impact of perceived or objective residential green/blue spaces on self-rated health in the analysis and presentation of results. Seven studies were included. They presented an overall positive impact of green space on self-rated health. No consistent sex/gender differences in the impact of green space on self-rated health were found in these studies. However, all studies used a binary operationalization male/female without further theoretical foundation. Research quality could be enhanced by integrating sex/gender-theoretical concepts into study design and interpretation of results.</description><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental health</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gender Identity</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Sex linkage</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctuEzEYhS1ERUthyxJZYsNmWl8mvmyQotKmlSohNbC2PPZv4mjiCbanlxfguZmopbeVLf-fP_voIPSJkiPONTmOa8jbFRWMt4qqN-iACkGaVhD69tl-H70vZU0IV63Q79A-p4pQRvUB-ruE2-MFJA8Zf48hQIbkoOCYcF0BnpcyuGhrHBLuoN4AJHwFJXpINdoeL_LuZLm1DrBNHi-hD82VreDxOdi-rpo5fnqhORvcWKbZ8q5U2ExaN9muI9x8QHvB9gU-PqyH6NfZ6c-T8-byx-LiZH7ZuJaq2qgZ-AA6SMKgbVtPiJZAhANQntHgHZNWBmolWE2CUpa2Xcd4Z53WzLaSH6Jv997t2G3AuylGtr3Z5rix-c4MNpqXkxRX5vdwbYRmQurZJPj6IMjDnxFKNZtYHPS9TTCMxTDOGOVSSz2hX16h62HMaYq3o_RMCzITE3V0T7k8lJIhPH6GErOr2LyseLrw-XmER_x_p_wfjumlRA</recordid><startdate>20191130</startdate><enddate>20191130</enddate><creator>Bolte, Gabriele</creator><creator>Nanninga, Sarah</creator><creator>Dandolo, Lisa</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0269-5059</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191130</creationdate><title>Sex/Gender Differences in the Association between Residential Green Space and Self-Rated Health-A Sex/Gender-Focused Systematic Review</title><author>Bolte, Gabriele ; Nanninga, Sarah ; Dandolo, Lisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-85edfe9f702e444d0097e06cee8d21fdc27a7f1a7ea90f88a14bb23bac992a473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental health</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gender Identity</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Sex linkage</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bolte, Gabriele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanninga, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dandolo, Lisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bolte, Gabriele</au><au>Nanninga, Sarah</au><au>Dandolo, Lisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex/Gender Differences in the Association between Residential Green Space and Self-Rated Health-A Sex/Gender-Focused Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2019-11-30</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>4818</spage><pages>4818-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Though sex/gender is an important social determinant of health, sex/gender inequalities have not been considered comprehensively in environmental health research thus far. The aim of this systematic review was to clarify whether sex/gender theoretical concepts were addressed in studies on the impact of residential green space on self-rated health and whether effect modification by sex/gender was observed. Three electronic databases were searched to identify epidemiological studies on perceived or objective residential green/blue space and self-rated health. Necessary for study inclusion was mentioning at least one keyword for sex/gender in title or abstract, adult study participants and data on self-rated health and on availability and/or use of green/blue spaces. Decisive for study inclusion was consideration of sex/gender differences in the impact of perceived or objective residential green/blue spaces on self-rated health in the analysis and presentation of results. Seven studies were included. They presented an overall positive impact of green space on self-rated health. No consistent sex/gender differences in the impact of green space on self-rated health were found in these studies. However, all studies used a binary operationalization male/female without further theoretical foundation. Research quality could be enhanced by integrating sex/gender-theoretical concepts into study design and interpretation of results.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>31801219</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph16234818</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0269-5059</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019-11, Vol.16 (23), p.4818 |
| issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6926795 |
| source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Environment Environmental health Epidemiology Exposure Females Gender Gender differences Gender Identity Health Status Humans Males Medical research Public health Quality Residence Characteristics Review Reviews Self Report Sex differences Sex Factors Sex linkage Socioeconomic Factors Studies Systematic review |
| title | Sex/Gender Differences in the Association between Residential Green Space and Self-Rated Health-A Sex/Gender-Focused Systematic Review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T05%3A57%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex/Gender%20Differences%20in%20the%20Association%20between%20Residential%20Green%20Space%20and%20Self-Rated%20Health-A%20Sex/Gender-Focused%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Bolte,%20Gabriele&rft.date=2019-11-30&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=4818&rft.pages=4818-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph16234818&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2322137979%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2329596056&rft_id=info:pmid/31801219&rfr_iscdi=true |