Racial disparities and temporal trends in dementia misdiagnosis risk in the United States
Systematic disparities in misdiagnosis of dementia across racial/ethnic groups have implications for health disparities. We compared the risk of dementia under- and overdiagnosis in clinical settings across racial/ethnic groups from 2000 to 2010. We linked fee-for-service Medicare claims to particip...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Alzheimer's & dementia : translational research & clinical interventions 2019, Vol.5 (1), p.891-898 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 898 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 891 |
container_title | Alzheimer's & dementia : translational research & clinical interventions |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Gianattasio, Kan Z. Prather, Christina Glymour, M. Maria Ciarleglio, Adam Power, Melinda C. |
description | Systematic disparities in misdiagnosis of dementia across racial/ethnic groups have implications for health disparities. We compared the risk of dementia under- and overdiagnosis in clinical settings across racial/ethnic groups from 2000 to 2010.
We linked fee-for-service Medicare claims to participants aged ≥70 from the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study. We classified dementia status using an algorithm with similar sensitivity and specificity across racial/ethnic groups and assigned clinical dementia diagnosis status using ICD-9-CM codes from Medicare claims. Multinomial logit models were used to estimate relative risks of clinical under- and overdiagnosis between groups and over time.
Non-Hispanic blacks had roughly double the risk of underdiagnosis as non-Hispanic whites. While primary analyses suggested a shrinking disparity over time, this was not robust to sensitivity analyses or adjustment for covariates. Risk of overdiagnosis increased over time in both groups.
Our results suggest that efforts to reduce racial disparities in underdiagnosis are warranted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.trci.2019.11.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6926355</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2352873719300940</els_id><sourcerecordid>2331622269</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5428-5fa68ab51535f3fd537f254c0f1ebccc448e72660b96f1226178bf2001ea4fd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1LHTEUHUqlivoHuihZdvOm-ZjMZKAU2odtFUGwuugqZJIbva_z8ZrkWfz3zTBWdFPcJOHec885N6co3jJaMsrqD5syBYslp6wtGSspVa-KAy4kX6lGNK-fvPeL4xg3lFImuWqFfFPsC6ZaqqQ4KH5eGoumJw7j1gRMCJGY0ZEEw3YKuZECjC4SHImDAcaEhgwYHZqbcYoYScD4a-6mWyDXIyZw5EcyCeJRsedNH-H44T4srr-eXK2_r84vvp2uP5-vrKy4WklvamU6yaSQXngnReO5rCz1DDprbVUpaHhd066tPeO8Zo3qPM_bgKm84-Kw-LTwbnfdAM5mj9m33gYcTLjXk0H9vDPirb6Z7nTd8lpImQnePxCE6fcOYtJ5QQt9b0aYdlFzIVjNs3KboXyB2jDFGMA_yjCq51j0Rs-x6DkWzZjOseShd08NPo78CyEDviyAP9jD_Qso9dXlmp_l43QuMraofFxIIP_1HULQ0SKMFhwGsEm7Cf9n8i-bsrQD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2331622269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Racial disparities and temporal trends in dementia misdiagnosis risk in the United States</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gianattasio, Kan Z. ; Prather, Christina ; Glymour, M. Maria ; Ciarleglio, Adam ; Power, Melinda C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gianattasio, Kan Z. ; Prather, Christina ; Glymour, M. Maria ; Ciarleglio, Adam ; Power, Melinda C.</creatorcontrib><description>Systematic disparities in misdiagnosis of dementia across racial/ethnic groups have implications for health disparities. We compared the risk of dementia under- and overdiagnosis in clinical settings across racial/ethnic groups from 2000 to 2010.
We linked fee-for-service Medicare claims to participants aged ≥70 from the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study. We classified dementia status using an algorithm with similar sensitivity and specificity across racial/ethnic groups and assigned clinical dementia diagnosis status using ICD-9-CM codes from Medicare claims. Multinomial logit models were used to estimate relative risks of clinical under- and overdiagnosis between groups and over time.
Non-Hispanic blacks had roughly double the risk of underdiagnosis as non-Hispanic whites. While primary analyses suggested a shrinking disparity over time, this was not robust to sensitivity analyses or adjustment for covariates. Risk of overdiagnosis increased over time in both groups.
Our results suggest that efforts to reduce racial disparities in underdiagnosis are warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2352-8737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-8737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.trci.2019.11.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31890853</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Alzheimer's disease ; Clinical diagnosis ; Dementia ; Disparities ; Health and retirement study</subject><ispartof>Alzheimer's & dementia : translational research & clinical interventions, 2019, Vol.5 (1), p.891-898</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>2019 The Authors.</rights><rights>2019 The Authors 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5428-5fa68ab51535f3fd537f254c0f1ebccc448e72660b96f1226178bf2001ea4fd23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5428-5fa68ab51535f3fd537f254c0f1ebccc448e72660b96f1226178bf2001ea4fd23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926355/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6926355/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,4010,11541,27900,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31890853$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gianattasio, Kan Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prather, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glymour, M. Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciarleglio, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Power, Melinda C.</creatorcontrib><title>Racial disparities and temporal trends in dementia misdiagnosis risk in the United States</title><title>Alzheimer's & dementia : translational research & clinical interventions</title><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement (N Y)</addtitle><description>Systematic disparities in misdiagnosis of dementia across racial/ethnic groups have implications for health disparities. We compared the risk of dementia under- and overdiagnosis in clinical settings across racial/ethnic groups from 2000 to 2010.
We linked fee-for-service Medicare claims to participants aged ≥70 from the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study. We classified dementia status using an algorithm with similar sensitivity and specificity across racial/ethnic groups and assigned clinical dementia diagnosis status using ICD-9-CM codes from Medicare claims. Multinomial logit models were used to estimate relative risks of clinical under- and overdiagnosis between groups and over time.
Non-Hispanic blacks had roughly double the risk of underdiagnosis as non-Hispanic whites. While primary analyses suggested a shrinking disparity over time, this was not robust to sensitivity analyses or adjustment for covariates. Risk of overdiagnosis increased over time in both groups.
Our results suggest that efforts to reduce racial disparities in underdiagnosis are warranted.</description><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Clinical diagnosis</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Disparities</subject><subject>Health and retirement study</subject><issn>2352-8737</issn><issn>2352-8737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUU1LHTEUHUqlivoHuihZdvOm-ZjMZKAU2odtFUGwuugqZJIbva_z8ZrkWfz3zTBWdFPcJOHec885N6co3jJaMsrqD5syBYslp6wtGSspVa-KAy4kX6lGNK-fvPeL4xg3lFImuWqFfFPsC6ZaqqQ4KH5eGoumJw7j1gRMCJGY0ZEEw3YKuZECjC4SHImDAcaEhgwYHZqbcYoYScD4a-6mWyDXIyZw5EcyCeJRsedNH-H44T4srr-eXK2_r84vvp2uP5-vrKy4WklvamU6yaSQXngnReO5rCz1DDprbVUpaHhd066tPeO8Zo3qPM_bgKm84-Kw-LTwbnfdAM5mj9m33gYcTLjXk0H9vDPirb6Z7nTd8lpImQnePxCE6fcOYtJ5QQt9b0aYdlFzIVjNs3KboXyB2jDFGMA_yjCq51j0Rs-x6DkWzZjOseShd08NPo78CyEDviyAP9jD_Qso9dXlmp_l43QuMraofFxIIP_1HULQ0SKMFhwGsEm7Cf9n8i-bsrQD</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Gianattasio, Kan Z.</creator><creator>Prather, Christina</creator><creator>Glymour, M. Maria</creator><creator>Ciarleglio, Adam</creator><creator>Power, Melinda C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Racial disparities and temporal trends in dementia misdiagnosis risk in the United States</title><author>Gianattasio, Kan Z. ; Prather, Christina ; Glymour, M. Maria ; Ciarleglio, Adam ; Power, Melinda C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5428-5fa68ab51535f3fd537f254c0f1ebccc448e72660b96f1226178bf2001ea4fd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Clinical diagnosis</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Disparities</topic><topic>Health and retirement study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gianattasio, Kan Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prather, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glymour, M. Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciarleglio, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Power, Melinda C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Alzheimer's & dementia : translational research & clinical interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gianattasio, Kan Z.</au><au>Prather, Christina</au><au>Glymour, M. Maria</au><au>Ciarleglio, Adam</au><au>Power, Melinda C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Racial disparities and temporal trends in dementia misdiagnosis risk in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Alzheimer's & dementia : translational research & clinical interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Alzheimers Dement (N Y)</addtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>891</spage><epage>898</epage><pages>891-898</pages><issn>2352-8737</issn><eissn>2352-8737</eissn><abstract>Systematic disparities in misdiagnosis of dementia across racial/ethnic groups have implications for health disparities. We compared the risk of dementia under- and overdiagnosis in clinical settings across racial/ethnic groups from 2000 to 2010.
We linked fee-for-service Medicare claims to participants aged ≥70 from the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study. We classified dementia status using an algorithm with similar sensitivity and specificity across racial/ethnic groups and assigned clinical dementia diagnosis status using ICD-9-CM codes from Medicare claims. Multinomial logit models were used to estimate relative risks of clinical under- and overdiagnosis between groups and over time.
Non-Hispanic blacks had roughly double the risk of underdiagnosis as non-Hispanic whites. While primary analyses suggested a shrinking disparity over time, this was not robust to sensitivity analyses or adjustment for covariates. Risk of overdiagnosis increased over time in both groups.
Our results suggest that efforts to reduce racial disparities in underdiagnosis are warranted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31890853</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.trci.2019.11.008</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2352-8737 |
ispartof | Alzheimer's & dementia : translational research & clinical interventions, 2019, Vol.5 (1), p.891-898 |
issn | 2352-8737 2352-8737 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6926355 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Alzheimer's disease Clinical diagnosis Dementia Disparities Health and retirement study |
title | Racial disparities and temporal trends in dementia misdiagnosis risk in the United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T20%3A28%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Racial%20disparities%20and%20temporal%20trends%20in%20dementia%20misdiagnosis%20risk%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Alzheimer's%20&%20dementia%20:%20translational%20research%20&%20clinical%20interventions&rft.au=Gianattasio,%20Kan%20Z.&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=891&rft.epage=898&rft.pages=891-898&rft.issn=2352-8737&rft.eissn=2352-8737&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.trci.2019.11.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2331622269%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2331622269&rft_id=info:pmid/31890853&rft_els_id=S2352873719300940&rfr_iscdi=true |