Bioaugmentation failed to enhance oil bioremediation in three soil samples from three different continents
Soil samples from Kuwait, Lebanon, Egypt and Germany were polluted with 3% crude oil. Series of samples were left unbioaugmented, others were bioaugmented with Kuwaiti desert soil with a long history of oil pollution and still others with Kuwaiti marine biofouling material. In the samples from Kuwai...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2019-12, Vol.9 (1), p.19508-11, Article 19508 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 11 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 19508 |
| container_title | Scientific reports |
| container_volume | 9 |
| creator | Radwan, Samir S. Al-Mailem, Dina M. Kansour, Mayada K. |
| description | Soil samples from Kuwait, Lebanon, Egypt and Germany were polluted with 3% crude oil. Series of samples were left unbioaugmented, others were bioaugmented with Kuwaiti desert soil with a long history of oil pollution and still others with Kuwaiti marine biofouling material. In the samples from Kuwait, Egypt, and Germany, bioaugmentation did not enhance oil removal, whereas it did in the sample from Lebanon. Taxa from the desert-soil bioaugmented batches, but none of those from the biofouling-material bioaugmented ones, succeeded in colonizing the four studied soils. The dynamics of the hydrocarbonoclastic communities during bioremediation were monitored. Those communities differed in composition, not only according to the type of soil, but also for the same soil; at various phases of bioremediation. Although each soil seemed to have its characteristic microflora, they all were similar in harboring lower and higher actinomycetes and pseudomonads in addition to many other taxa. None of the taxa prevailed through all phases of bioremediation. The most powerful isolate in oil-removal; was
Rhodococcus erythropolis
(Germany), and the weakest was
Arthrobacter phenanthrenivorans
(Lebanon). The pure hydrocarbonoclastic isolates tolerated unusually high oil concentrations, up to 30%. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-019-56099-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6925256</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2329729835</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-6230cc4ba7645d2b0e4d6ebbc320160c5449441b3fad891aea182ae98bca47c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi0EYtHCH-BQWeqFS4o_k_hSqV21BQmJC5wtx5nsepXYWzupxL-vl2zptgd8sEeeZ94Z-0XompJPlPD6NgkqVV0QqgpZEqUKdoIuGBGyYJyx06N4ga5S2pK8JFOCqnO04LQumarqC7T96oKZ1gP40YwueNwZ10OLx4DBb4y3gIPrceNChAFaN0PO43ETAXDaJ5MZdj0k3MUwHO5b13UQsyi2wY_O5yhdorPO9AmuDucSPX__9rS6Kx4ef9yvvjwUVlRiLErGibWiMVUpZMsaAqItoWksZ4SWxEohlBC04Z1pa0UNGFozA6purBGVlXyJPs-6u6nJI9vcO5pe76IbTHzRwTj9b8a7jV6HX7pUTDJZZoGbg0AMPydIox5cstD3xkOYks6fqiqmar7v9fE_dBum6PPzXimeN7Kn2EzZGFKK0L0NQ4neu6lnN3V2U7-6mauX6MPxM95K_niXAT4DKaf8GuLf3u_I_gYsAq0d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2329323205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bioaugmentation failed to enhance oil bioremediation in three soil samples from three different continents</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Radwan, Samir S. ; Al-Mailem, Dina M. ; Kansour, Mayada K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Radwan, Samir S. ; Al-Mailem, Dina M. ; Kansour, Mayada K.</creatorcontrib><description>Soil samples from Kuwait, Lebanon, Egypt and Germany were polluted with 3% crude oil. Series of samples were left unbioaugmented, others were bioaugmented with Kuwaiti desert soil with a long history of oil pollution and still others with Kuwaiti marine biofouling material. In the samples from Kuwait, Egypt, and Germany, bioaugmentation did not enhance oil removal, whereas it did in the sample from Lebanon. Taxa from the desert-soil bioaugmented batches, but none of those from the biofouling-material bioaugmented ones, succeeded in colonizing the four studied soils. The dynamics of the hydrocarbonoclastic communities during bioremediation were monitored. Those communities differed in composition, not only according to the type of soil, but also for the same soil; at various phases of bioremediation. Although each soil seemed to have its characteristic microflora, they all were similar in harboring lower and higher actinomycetes and pseudomonads in addition to many other taxa. None of the taxa prevailed through all phases of bioremediation. The most powerful isolate in oil-removal; was
Rhodococcus erythropolis
(Germany), and the weakest was
Arthrobacter phenanthrenivorans
(Lebanon). The pure hydrocarbonoclastic isolates tolerated unusually high oil concentrations, up to 30%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56099-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31862978</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>38/22 ; 38/23 ; 38/77 ; 45/29 ; 631/326/1320 ; 631/326/171/1818 ; 631/326/2565/855 ; Actinomycetes ; Biofouling ; Bioremediation ; Crude oil ; Desert soils ; Deserts ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Microflora ; multidisciplinary ; Oil pollution ; Oil removal ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Soil types</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2019-12, Vol.9 (1), p.19508-11, Article 19508</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-6230cc4ba7645d2b0e4d6ebbc320160c5449441b3fad891aea182ae98bca47c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-6230cc4ba7645d2b0e4d6ebbc320160c5449441b3fad891aea182ae98bca47c53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7687-4984</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925256/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6925256/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31862978$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Radwan, Samir S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Mailem, Dina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kansour, Mayada K.</creatorcontrib><title>Bioaugmentation failed to enhance oil bioremediation in three soil samples from three different continents</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Soil samples from Kuwait, Lebanon, Egypt and Germany were polluted with 3% crude oil. Series of samples were left unbioaugmented, others were bioaugmented with Kuwaiti desert soil with a long history of oil pollution and still others with Kuwaiti marine biofouling material. In the samples from Kuwait, Egypt, and Germany, bioaugmentation did not enhance oil removal, whereas it did in the sample from Lebanon. Taxa from the desert-soil bioaugmented batches, but none of those from the biofouling-material bioaugmented ones, succeeded in colonizing the four studied soils. The dynamics of the hydrocarbonoclastic communities during bioremediation were monitored. Those communities differed in composition, not only according to the type of soil, but also for the same soil; at various phases of bioremediation. Although each soil seemed to have its characteristic microflora, they all were similar in harboring lower and higher actinomycetes and pseudomonads in addition to many other taxa. None of the taxa prevailed through all phases of bioremediation. The most powerful isolate in oil-removal; was
Rhodococcus erythropolis
(Germany), and the weakest was
Arthrobacter phenanthrenivorans
(Lebanon). The pure hydrocarbonoclastic isolates tolerated unusually high oil concentrations, up to 30%.</description><subject>38/22</subject><subject>38/23</subject><subject>38/77</subject><subject>45/29</subject><subject>631/326/1320</subject><subject>631/326/171/1818</subject><subject>631/326/2565/855</subject><subject>Actinomycetes</subject><subject>Biofouling</subject><subject>Bioremediation</subject><subject>Crude oil</subject><subject>Desert soils</subject><subject>Deserts</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Microflora</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Oil pollution</subject><subject>Oil removal</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Soil types</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi0EYtHCH-BQWeqFS4o_k_hSqV21BQmJC5wtx5nsepXYWzupxL-vl2zptgd8sEeeZ94Z-0XompJPlPD6NgkqVV0QqgpZEqUKdoIuGBGyYJyx06N4ga5S2pK8JFOCqnO04LQumarqC7T96oKZ1gP40YwueNwZ10OLx4DBb4y3gIPrceNChAFaN0PO43ETAXDaJ5MZdj0k3MUwHO5b13UQsyi2wY_O5yhdorPO9AmuDucSPX__9rS6Kx4ef9yvvjwUVlRiLErGibWiMVUpZMsaAqItoWksZ4SWxEohlBC04Z1pa0UNGFozA6purBGVlXyJPs-6u6nJI9vcO5pe76IbTHzRwTj9b8a7jV6HX7pUTDJZZoGbg0AMPydIox5cstD3xkOYks6fqiqmar7v9fE_dBum6PPzXimeN7Kn2EzZGFKK0L0NQ4neu6lnN3V2U7-6mauX6MPxM95K_niXAT4DKaf8GuLf3u_I_gYsAq0d</recordid><startdate>20191220</startdate><enddate>20191220</enddate><creator>Radwan, Samir S.</creator><creator>Al-Mailem, Dina M.</creator><creator>Kansour, Mayada K.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7687-4984</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191220</creationdate><title>Bioaugmentation failed to enhance oil bioremediation in three soil samples from three different continents</title><author>Radwan, Samir S. ; Al-Mailem, Dina M. ; Kansour, Mayada K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-6230cc4ba7645d2b0e4d6ebbc320160c5449441b3fad891aea182ae98bca47c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>38/22</topic><topic>38/23</topic><topic>38/77</topic><topic>45/29</topic><topic>631/326/1320</topic><topic>631/326/171/1818</topic><topic>631/326/2565/855</topic><topic>Actinomycetes</topic><topic>Biofouling</topic><topic>Bioremediation</topic><topic>Crude oil</topic><topic>Desert soils</topic><topic>Deserts</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Microflora</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Oil pollution</topic><topic>Oil removal</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Soil types</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Radwan, Samir S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Mailem, Dina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kansour, Mayada K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Radwan, Samir S.</au><au>Al-Mailem, Dina M.</au><au>Kansour, Mayada K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bioaugmentation failed to enhance oil bioremediation in three soil samples from three different continents</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2019-12-20</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19508</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>19508-11</pages><artnum>19508</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Soil samples from Kuwait, Lebanon, Egypt and Germany were polluted with 3% crude oil. Series of samples were left unbioaugmented, others were bioaugmented with Kuwaiti desert soil with a long history of oil pollution and still others with Kuwaiti marine biofouling material. In the samples from Kuwait, Egypt, and Germany, bioaugmentation did not enhance oil removal, whereas it did in the sample from Lebanon. Taxa from the desert-soil bioaugmented batches, but none of those from the biofouling-material bioaugmented ones, succeeded in colonizing the four studied soils. The dynamics of the hydrocarbonoclastic communities during bioremediation were monitored. Those communities differed in composition, not only according to the type of soil, but also for the same soil; at various phases of bioremediation. Although each soil seemed to have its characteristic microflora, they all were similar in harboring lower and higher actinomycetes and pseudomonads in addition to many other taxa. None of the taxa prevailed through all phases of bioremediation. The most powerful isolate in oil-removal; was
Rhodococcus erythropolis
(Germany), and the weakest was
Arthrobacter phenanthrenivorans
(Lebanon). The pure hydrocarbonoclastic isolates tolerated unusually high oil concentrations, up to 30%.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>31862978</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-019-56099-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7687-4984</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
| ispartof | Scientific reports, 2019-12, Vol.9 (1), p.19508-11, Article 19508 |
| issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6925256 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Nature Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | 38/22 38/23 38/77 45/29 631/326/1320 631/326/171/1818 631/326/2565/855 Actinomycetes Biofouling Bioremediation Crude oil Desert soils Deserts Humanities and Social Sciences Microflora multidisciplinary Oil pollution Oil removal Science Science (multidisciplinary) Soil types |
| title | Bioaugmentation failed to enhance oil bioremediation in three soil samples from three different continents |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T03%3A12%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioaugmentation%20failed%20to%20enhance%20oil%20bioremediation%20in%20three%20soil%20samples%20from%20three%20different%20continents&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Radwan,%20Samir%20S.&rft.date=2019-12-20&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19508&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=19508-11&rft.artnum=19508&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-019-56099-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2329729835%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2329323205&rft_id=info:pmid/31862978&rfr_iscdi=true |