Light reflectivity and interference in cone photoreceptors

In several modes of retinal imaging, the primary means of visualizing cone photoreceptors is from reflected light. Understanding how such images are formed, particularly when adaptive optics techniques are used, will help to guide their interpretation. Toward this end, we used finite difference beam...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biomedical optics express 2019-12, Vol.10 (12), p.6531-6554
Hauptverfasser: Meadway, Alexander, Sincich, Lawrence C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6554
container_issue 12
container_start_page 6531
container_title Biomedical optics express
container_volume 10
creator Meadway, Alexander
Sincich, Lawrence C
description In several modes of retinal imaging, the primary means of visualizing cone photoreceptors is from reflected light. Understanding how such images are formed, particularly when adaptive optics techniques are used, will help to guide their interpretation. Toward this end, we used finite difference beam propagation to model reflections from cone photoreceptors. We investigated the formation of cone images in adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) and optical coherence tomography (AOOCT). Three cone models were tested, one made up of three segments of varying refractive index, the other two having additional boundaries at the inner/outer segment junction and outer segment tip. Images formed by the first model did not correspond to AOOCT observations in the literature, while the latter two did. The predicted distributions of reflected light intensity from the latter cone models were compared to the distribution from AOSLO images, both studied with light sources of varied coherence length. The cone model with the most reflections at the inner/outer segment junction best fit the data measured . These results show that variance in cone reflection can originate from light interfering from reflectors much more closely spaced than the outer segment length. We also show that subtracting images taken with different coherence length sources highlights these changes in interference. Differential coherence images of cones occasionally revealed an annular reflection profile, which modeling showed to be very sensitive to cone size and the gaps bracketing the outer segment, suggesting that such imaging may be useful for probing photoreceptor morphology.
doi_str_mv 10.1364/BOE.10.006531
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6913404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2328757207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1f22c1e6e2be8926b7e0ea563453fa39c6b120817f997bce6f2a11d22f7be0eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtrAjEURkNpqWJddltm2c3YPCbJTBeFVuwDBDftOmTijaaME5uMgv--Ea3YbO4XcvhuOAjdEjwiTBQPL7PJKGWMBWfkAvUp4SKXuOSXZ7mHhjF-43SKQmJWXqMeIyVnBeF99Dh1i2WXBbANmM5tXbfLdDvPXNtBsBCgNZAumfEtZOul73wAA-s04g26srqJMDzOAfp6nXyO3_Pp7O1j_DzNDStllxNLqSEggNZQVlTUEjBoLljBmdWsMqImFJdE2qqStQFhqSZkTqmVdSJrNkBPh971pl7B3EDbBd2odXArHXbKa6f-v7RuqRZ-q0RFWIGLVHB_LAj-ZwOxUysXDTSNbsFvoqKMlpJLimVC8wNqgo8xWTmtIVjtlaukfJ8PyhN_d_63E_0nmP0CxLh9CA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2328757207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Light reflectivity and interference in cone photoreceptors</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Meadway, Alexander ; Sincich, Lawrence C</creator><creatorcontrib>Meadway, Alexander ; Sincich, Lawrence C</creatorcontrib><description>In several modes of retinal imaging, the primary means of visualizing cone photoreceptors is from reflected light. Understanding how such images are formed, particularly when adaptive optics techniques are used, will help to guide their interpretation. Toward this end, we used finite difference beam propagation to model reflections from cone photoreceptors. We investigated the formation of cone images in adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) and optical coherence tomography (AOOCT). Three cone models were tested, one made up of three segments of varying refractive index, the other two having additional boundaries at the inner/outer segment junction and outer segment tip. Images formed by the first model did not correspond to AOOCT observations in the literature, while the latter two did. The predicted distributions of reflected light intensity from the latter cone models were compared to the distribution from AOSLO images, both studied with light sources of varied coherence length. The cone model with the most reflections at the inner/outer segment junction best fit the data measured . These results show that variance in cone reflection can originate from light interfering from reflectors much more closely spaced than the outer segment length. We also show that subtracting images taken with different coherence length sources highlights these changes in interference. Differential coherence images of cones occasionally revealed an annular reflection profile, which modeling showed to be very sensitive to cone size and the gaps bracketing the outer segment, suggesting that such imaging may be useful for probing photoreceptor morphology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2156-7085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-7085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1364/BOE.10.006531</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31853415</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Optical Society of America</publisher><ispartof>Biomedical optics express, 2019-12, Vol.10 (12), p.6531-6554</ispartof><rights>2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement.</rights><rights>2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the 2019 Optical Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1f22c1e6e2be8926b7e0ea563453fa39c6b120817f997bce6f2a11d22f7be0eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1f22c1e6e2be8926b7e0ea563453fa39c6b120817f997bce6f2a11d22f7be0eb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9815-7783</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913404/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913404/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31853415$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meadway, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sincich, Lawrence C</creatorcontrib><title>Light reflectivity and interference in cone photoreceptors</title><title>Biomedical optics express</title><addtitle>Biomed Opt Express</addtitle><description>In several modes of retinal imaging, the primary means of visualizing cone photoreceptors is from reflected light. Understanding how such images are formed, particularly when adaptive optics techniques are used, will help to guide their interpretation. Toward this end, we used finite difference beam propagation to model reflections from cone photoreceptors. We investigated the formation of cone images in adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) and optical coherence tomography (AOOCT). Three cone models were tested, one made up of three segments of varying refractive index, the other two having additional boundaries at the inner/outer segment junction and outer segment tip. Images formed by the first model did not correspond to AOOCT observations in the literature, while the latter two did. The predicted distributions of reflected light intensity from the latter cone models were compared to the distribution from AOSLO images, both studied with light sources of varied coherence length. The cone model with the most reflections at the inner/outer segment junction best fit the data measured . These results show that variance in cone reflection can originate from light interfering from reflectors much more closely spaced than the outer segment length. We also show that subtracting images taken with different coherence length sources highlights these changes in interference. Differential coherence images of cones occasionally revealed an annular reflection profile, which modeling showed to be very sensitive to cone size and the gaps bracketing the outer segment, suggesting that such imaging may be useful for probing photoreceptor morphology.</description><issn>2156-7085</issn><issn>2156-7085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtrAjEURkNpqWJddltm2c3YPCbJTBeFVuwDBDftOmTijaaME5uMgv--Ea3YbO4XcvhuOAjdEjwiTBQPL7PJKGWMBWfkAvUp4SKXuOSXZ7mHhjF-43SKQmJWXqMeIyVnBeF99Dh1i2WXBbANmM5tXbfLdDvPXNtBsBCgNZAumfEtZOul73wAA-s04g26srqJMDzOAfp6nXyO3_Pp7O1j_DzNDStllxNLqSEggNZQVlTUEjBoLljBmdWsMqImFJdE2qqStQFhqSZkTqmVdSJrNkBPh971pl7B3EDbBd2odXArHXbKa6f-v7RuqRZ-q0RFWIGLVHB_LAj-ZwOxUysXDTSNbsFvoqKMlpJLimVC8wNqgo8xWTmtIVjtlaukfJ8PyhN_d_63E_0nmP0CxLh9CA</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Meadway, Alexander</creator><creator>Sincich, Lawrence C</creator><general>Optical Society of America</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9815-7783</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Light reflectivity and interference in cone photoreceptors</title><author>Meadway, Alexander ; Sincich, Lawrence C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-1f22c1e6e2be8926b7e0ea563453fa39c6b120817f997bce6f2a11d22f7be0eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meadway, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sincich, Lawrence C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biomedical optics express</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meadway, Alexander</au><au>Sincich, Lawrence C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Light reflectivity and interference in cone photoreceptors</atitle><jtitle>Biomedical optics express</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Opt Express</addtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>6531</spage><epage>6554</epage><pages>6531-6554</pages><issn>2156-7085</issn><eissn>2156-7085</eissn><abstract>In several modes of retinal imaging, the primary means of visualizing cone photoreceptors is from reflected light. Understanding how such images are formed, particularly when adaptive optics techniques are used, will help to guide their interpretation. Toward this end, we used finite difference beam propagation to model reflections from cone photoreceptors. We investigated the formation of cone images in adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) and optical coherence tomography (AOOCT). Three cone models were tested, one made up of three segments of varying refractive index, the other two having additional boundaries at the inner/outer segment junction and outer segment tip. Images formed by the first model did not correspond to AOOCT observations in the literature, while the latter two did. The predicted distributions of reflected light intensity from the latter cone models were compared to the distribution from AOSLO images, both studied with light sources of varied coherence length. The cone model with the most reflections at the inner/outer segment junction best fit the data measured . These results show that variance in cone reflection can originate from light interfering from reflectors much more closely spaced than the outer segment length. We also show that subtracting images taken with different coherence length sources highlights these changes in interference. Differential coherence images of cones occasionally revealed an annular reflection profile, which modeling showed to be very sensitive to cone size and the gaps bracketing the outer segment, suggesting that such imaging may be useful for probing photoreceptor morphology.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Optical Society of America</pub><pmid>31853415</pmid><doi>10.1364/BOE.10.006531</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9815-7783</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2156-7085
ispartof Biomedical optics express, 2019-12, Vol.10 (12), p.6531-6554
issn 2156-7085
2156-7085
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6913404
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
title Light reflectivity and interference in cone photoreceptors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T02%3A20%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Light%20reflectivity%20and%20interference%20in%20cone%20photoreceptors&rft.jtitle=Biomedical%20optics%20express&rft.au=Meadway,%20Alexander&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=6531&rft.epage=6554&rft.pages=6531-6554&rft.issn=2156-7085&rft.eissn=2156-7085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1364/BOE.10.006531&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2328757207%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2328757207&rft_id=info:pmid/31853415&rfr_iscdi=true