Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments: Reliability and Validity in Veterans Following Orthopedic Surgery

The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) offers standardized assessment measures of clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of select PROMIS measures with U.S. military veterans following orthopedic surgery. Data f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evaluation & the health professions 2020-12, Vol.43 (4), p.207-212
Hauptverfasser: Hadlandsmyth, Katherine, Dindo, Lilian N., St. Marie, Barbara J., Wajid, Roohina, Embree, Jennie L., Noiseux, Nicolas O., Tripp-Reimer, Toni, Zimmerman, M. Bridget, Rakel, Barbara A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 212
container_issue 4
container_start_page 207
container_title Evaluation & the health professions
container_volume 43
creator Hadlandsmyth, Katherine
Dindo, Lilian N.
St. Marie, Barbara J.
Wajid, Roohina
Embree, Jennie L.
Noiseux, Nicolas O.
Tripp-Reimer, Toni
Zimmerman, M. Bridget
Rakel, Barbara A.
description The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) offers standardized assessment measures of clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of select PROMIS measures with U.S. military veterans following orthopedic surgery. Data for the current study were collected as part of a pilot randomized control trial assessing the efficacy of a 1-day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy workshop on persistent postsurgical pain in at-risk veterans undergoing orthopedic surgery. Sixty-seven participants completed surveys 3 months after surgery. Participants completed the following PROMIS instruments: PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 8a, PROMIS Depression Short Form 8b, and PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a. PROMIS measures were compared to the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Scale, and the Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference subscale, respectively. All three PROMIS measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s αs ranged from .93 to .96) and each loaded onto a single factor. The PROMIS measures were moderately correlated with their respective comparison measures (r = .69 to .76). The PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression measures were highly correlated to one another (r = .91). Findings highlight the potential utility of these PROMIS measures in veterans following orthopedic surgery and the overlap between the PROMIS depression and anxiety measures in this sample.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0163278719856406
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6908780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0163278719856406</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2447808445</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-99bbfce6377a19e3867f0c7438550019b9bfbb0c6b67726440cb8c035116cd8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSMEokNhzwpZYlMWATvxLwskVFEYqdVUM9BtZDs3U1dJPLUd0LwFj4yjKQUqsbKuzneP79EpipcEvyVEiHeY8LoSUhAlGaeYPyoWhLGqrBWRj4vFLJezflQ8i_EGY1IxJp4WRzUhislKLoqflzo5GFO5hp0PCVq0mpL1A0R0ATpOAYasouXY-TBk1I9os48JBnRyuV5dLDdvshZTmGYsvkdr6J02rndpj_TYoivdu3Ye3IiuIEHQY0Rnvu_9Dzdu0Sqka7-D1lm0mcIWwv558aTTfYQXd-9x8e3s09fTL-X56vPy9ON5aSmvUqmUMZ0FXguhiYJactFhK2gtGcs5lVGmMwZbbrgQFacUWyMtrhkh3LbS1sfFh4PvbjIDtDafH3Tf7IIbdNg3XrvmX2V0183Wf2-4wlJInA1O7gyCv50gpmZw0ULf6xH8FJuqoowzStSMvn6A3vgpjDleU1GazSSlLFP4QNngYwzQ3R9DcDPX3TysO6-8-jvE_cLvfjNQHoCot_Dn1_8a_gKAjbTW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447808445</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments: Reliability and Validity in Veterans Following Orthopedic Surgery</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Hadlandsmyth, Katherine ; Dindo, Lilian N. ; St. Marie, Barbara J. ; Wajid, Roohina ; Embree, Jennie L. ; Noiseux, Nicolas O. ; Tripp-Reimer, Toni ; Zimmerman, M. Bridget ; Rakel, Barbara A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hadlandsmyth, Katherine ; Dindo, Lilian N. ; St. Marie, Barbara J. ; Wajid, Roohina ; Embree, Jennie L. ; Noiseux, Nicolas O. ; Tripp-Reimer, Toni ; Zimmerman, M. Bridget ; Rakel, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><description>The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) offers standardized assessment measures of clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of select PROMIS measures with U.S. military veterans following orthopedic surgery. Data for the current study were collected as part of a pilot randomized control trial assessing the efficacy of a 1-day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy workshop on persistent postsurgical pain in at-risk veterans undergoing orthopedic surgery. Sixty-seven participants completed surveys 3 months after surgery. Participants completed the following PROMIS instruments: PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 8a, PROMIS Depression Short Form 8b, and PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a. PROMIS measures were compared to the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Scale, and the Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference subscale, respectively. All three PROMIS measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s αs ranged from .93 to .96) and each loaded onto a single factor. The PROMIS measures were moderately correlated with their respective comparison measures (r = .69 to .76). The PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression measures were highly correlated to one another (r = .91). Findings highlight the potential utility of these PROMIS measures in veterans following orthopedic surgery and the overlap between the PROMIS depression and anxiety measures in this sample.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-2787</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3918</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0163278719856406</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31195828</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Acceptance and commitment therapy ; Anxiety ; Anxiety disorders ; Bone surgery ; Clinical trials ; Depression (Psychology) ; Efficacy ; Generalized anxiety disorder ; Health administration ; Health technology assessment ; Information systems ; Measurement ; Mental depression ; Orthopedic surgery ; Orthopedics ; Pain ; Reliability ; Surgery ; Validity ; Veterans</subject><ispartof>Evaluation &amp; the health professions, 2020-12, Vol.43 (4), p.207-212</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-99bbfce6377a19e3867f0c7438550019b9bfbb0c6b67726440cb8c035116cd8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-99bbfce6377a19e3867f0c7438550019b9bfbb0c6b67726440cb8c035116cd8c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0513-4609</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0163278719856406$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0163278719856406$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31195828$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hadlandsmyth, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dindo, Lilian N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Marie, Barbara J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wajid, Roohina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Embree, Jennie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noiseux, Nicolas O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripp-Reimer, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, M. Bridget</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakel, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><title>Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments: Reliability and Validity in Veterans Following Orthopedic Surgery</title><title>Evaluation &amp; the health professions</title><addtitle>Eval Health Prof</addtitle><description>The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) offers standardized assessment measures of clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of select PROMIS measures with U.S. military veterans following orthopedic surgery. Data for the current study were collected as part of a pilot randomized control trial assessing the efficacy of a 1-day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy workshop on persistent postsurgical pain in at-risk veterans undergoing orthopedic surgery. Sixty-seven participants completed surveys 3 months after surgery. Participants completed the following PROMIS instruments: PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 8a, PROMIS Depression Short Form 8b, and PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a. PROMIS measures were compared to the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Scale, and the Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference subscale, respectively. All three PROMIS measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s αs ranged from .93 to .96) and each loaded onto a single factor. The PROMIS measures were moderately correlated with their respective comparison measures (r = .69 to .76). The PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression measures were highly correlated to one another (r = .91). Findings highlight the potential utility of these PROMIS measures in veterans following orthopedic surgery and the overlap between the PROMIS depression and anxiety measures in this sample.</description><subject>Acceptance and commitment therapy</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety disorders</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Depression (Psychology)</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Generalized anxiety disorder</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Veterans</subject><issn>0163-2787</issn><issn>1552-3918</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSMEokNhzwpZYlMWATvxLwskVFEYqdVUM9BtZDs3U1dJPLUd0LwFj4yjKQUqsbKuzneP79EpipcEvyVEiHeY8LoSUhAlGaeYPyoWhLGqrBWRj4vFLJezflQ8i_EGY1IxJp4WRzUhislKLoqflzo5GFO5hp0PCVq0mpL1A0R0ATpOAYasouXY-TBk1I9os48JBnRyuV5dLDdvshZTmGYsvkdr6J02rndpj_TYoivdu3Ye3IiuIEHQY0Rnvu_9Dzdu0Sqka7-D1lm0mcIWwv558aTTfYQXd-9x8e3s09fTL-X56vPy9ON5aSmvUqmUMZ0FXguhiYJactFhK2gtGcs5lVGmMwZbbrgQFacUWyMtrhkh3LbS1sfFh4PvbjIDtDafH3Tf7IIbdNg3XrvmX2V0183Wf2-4wlJInA1O7gyCv50gpmZw0ULf6xH8FJuqoowzStSMvn6A3vgpjDleU1GazSSlLFP4QNngYwzQ3R9DcDPX3TysO6-8-jvE_cLvfjNQHoCot_Dn1_8a_gKAjbTW</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Hadlandsmyth, Katherine</creator><creator>Dindo, Lilian N.</creator><creator>St. Marie, Barbara J.</creator><creator>Wajid, Roohina</creator><creator>Embree, Jennie L.</creator><creator>Noiseux, Nicolas O.</creator><creator>Tripp-Reimer, Toni</creator><creator>Zimmerman, M. Bridget</creator><creator>Rakel, Barbara A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0513-4609</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments: Reliability and Validity in Veterans Following Orthopedic Surgery</title><author>Hadlandsmyth, Katherine ; Dindo, Lilian N. ; St. Marie, Barbara J. ; Wajid, Roohina ; Embree, Jennie L. ; Noiseux, Nicolas O. ; Tripp-Reimer, Toni ; Zimmerman, M. Bridget ; Rakel, Barbara A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-99bbfce6377a19e3867f0c7438550019b9bfbb0c6b67726440cb8c035116cd8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acceptance and commitment therapy</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety disorders</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Depression (Psychology)</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Generalized anxiety disorder</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Veterans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hadlandsmyth, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dindo, Lilian N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Marie, Barbara J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wajid, Roohina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Embree, Jennie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noiseux, Nicolas O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripp-Reimer, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, M. Bridget</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakel, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Evaluation &amp; the health professions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hadlandsmyth, Katherine</au><au>Dindo, Lilian N.</au><au>St. Marie, Barbara J.</au><au>Wajid, Roohina</au><au>Embree, Jennie L.</au><au>Noiseux, Nicolas O.</au><au>Tripp-Reimer, Toni</au><au>Zimmerman, M. Bridget</au><au>Rakel, Barbara A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments: Reliability and Validity in Veterans Following Orthopedic Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation &amp; the health professions</jtitle><addtitle>Eval Health Prof</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>207-212</pages><issn>0163-2787</issn><eissn>1552-3918</eissn><abstract>The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) offers standardized assessment measures of clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of select PROMIS measures with U.S. military veterans following orthopedic surgery. Data for the current study were collected as part of a pilot randomized control trial assessing the efficacy of a 1-day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy workshop on persistent postsurgical pain in at-risk veterans undergoing orthopedic surgery. Sixty-seven participants completed surveys 3 months after surgery. Participants completed the following PROMIS instruments: PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 8a, PROMIS Depression Short Form 8b, and PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a. PROMIS measures were compared to the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Scale, and the Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference subscale, respectively. All three PROMIS measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s αs ranged from .93 to .96) and each loaded onto a single factor. The PROMIS measures were moderately correlated with their respective comparison measures (r = .69 to .76). The PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression measures were highly correlated to one another (r = .91). Findings highlight the potential utility of these PROMIS measures in veterans following orthopedic surgery and the overlap between the PROMIS depression and anxiety measures in this sample.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31195828</pmid><doi>10.1177/0163278719856406</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0513-4609</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0163-2787
ispartof Evaluation & the health professions, 2020-12, Vol.43 (4), p.207-212
issn 0163-2787
1552-3918
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6908780
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete
subjects Acceptance and commitment therapy
Anxiety
Anxiety disorders
Bone surgery
Clinical trials
Depression (Psychology)
Efficacy
Generalized anxiety disorder
Health administration
Health technology assessment
Information systems
Measurement
Mental depression
Orthopedic surgery
Orthopedics
Pain
Reliability
Surgery
Validity
Veterans
title Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments: Reliability and Validity in Veterans Following Orthopedic Surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T11%3A32%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient-Reported%20Outcomes%20Measurement%20Information%20System%20(PROMIS)%20Instruments:%20Reliability%20and%20Validity%20in%20Veterans%20Following%20Orthopedic%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20&%20the%20health%20professions&rft.au=Hadlandsmyth,%20Katherine&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=207-212&rft.issn=0163-2787&rft.eissn=1552-3918&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0163278719856406&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2447808445%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447808445&rft_id=info:pmid/31195828&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0163278719856406&rfr_iscdi=true