Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments: Reliability and Validity in Veterans Following Orthopedic Surgery
The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) offers standardized assessment measures of clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of select PROMIS measures with U.S. military veterans following orthopedic surgery. Data f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evaluation & the health professions 2020-12, Vol.43 (4), p.207-212 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 212 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 207 |
container_title | Evaluation & the health professions |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Hadlandsmyth, Katherine Dindo, Lilian N. St. Marie, Barbara J. Wajid, Roohina Embree, Jennie L. Noiseux, Nicolas O. Tripp-Reimer, Toni Zimmerman, M. Bridget Rakel, Barbara A. |
description | The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) offers standardized assessment measures of clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of select PROMIS measures with U.S. military veterans following orthopedic surgery. Data for the current study were collected as part of a pilot randomized control trial assessing the efficacy of a 1-day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy workshop on persistent postsurgical pain in at-risk veterans undergoing orthopedic surgery. Sixty-seven participants completed surveys 3 months after surgery. Participants completed the following PROMIS instruments: PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 8a, PROMIS Depression Short Form 8b, and PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a. PROMIS measures were compared to the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Scale, and the Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference subscale, respectively. All three PROMIS measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s αs ranged from .93 to .96) and each loaded onto a single factor. The PROMIS measures were moderately correlated with their respective comparison measures (r = .69 to .76). The PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression measures were highly correlated to one another (r = .91). Findings highlight the potential utility of these PROMIS measures in veterans following orthopedic surgery and the overlap between the PROMIS depression and anxiety measures in this sample. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0163278719856406 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6908780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0163278719856406</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2447808445</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-99bbfce6377a19e3867f0c7438550019b9bfbb0c6b67726440cb8c035116cd8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSMEokNhzwpZYlMWATvxLwskVFEYqdVUM9BtZDs3U1dJPLUd0LwFj4yjKQUqsbKuzneP79EpipcEvyVEiHeY8LoSUhAlGaeYPyoWhLGqrBWRj4vFLJezflQ8i_EGY1IxJp4WRzUhislKLoqflzo5GFO5hp0PCVq0mpL1A0R0ATpOAYasouXY-TBk1I9os48JBnRyuV5dLDdvshZTmGYsvkdr6J02rndpj_TYoivdu3Ye3IiuIEHQY0Rnvu_9Dzdu0Sqka7-D1lm0mcIWwv558aTTfYQXd-9x8e3s09fTL-X56vPy9ON5aSmvUqmUMZ0FXguhiYJactFhK2gtGcs5lVGmMwZbbrgQFacUWyMtrhkh3LbS1sfFh4PvbjIDtDafH3Tf7IIbdNg3XrvmX2V0183Wf2-4wlJInA1O7gyCv50gpmZw0ULf6xH8FJuqoowzStSMvn6A3vgpjDleU1GazSSlLFP4QNngYwzQ3R9DcDPX3TysO6-8-jvE_cLvfjNQHoCot_Dn1_8a_gKAjbTW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447808445</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments: Reliability and Validity in Veterans Following Orthopedic Surgery</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Hadlandsmyth, Katherine ; Dindo, Lilian N. ; St. Marie, Barbara J. ; Wajid, Roohina ; Embree, Jennie L. ; Noiseux, Nicolas O. ; Tripp-Reimer, Toni ; Zimmerman, M. Bridget ; Rakel, Barbara A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hadlandsmyth, Katherine ; Dindo, Lilian N. ; St. Marie, Barbara J. ; Wajid, Roohina ; Embree, Jennie L. ; Noiseux, Nicolas O. ; Tripp-Reimer, Toni ; Zimmerman, M. Bridget ; Rakel, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><description>The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) offers standardized assessment measures of clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of select PROMIS measures with U.S. military veterans following orthopedic surgery. Data for the current study were collected as part of a pilot randomized control trial assessing the efficacy of a 1-day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy workshop on persistent postsurgical pain in at-risk veterans undergoing orthopedic surgery. Sixty-seven participants completed surveys 3 months after surgery. Participants completed the following PROMIS instruments: PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 8a, PROMIS Depression Short Form 8b, and PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a. PROMIS measures were compared to the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Scale, and the Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference subscale, respectively. All three PROMIS measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s αs ranged from .93 to .96) and each loaded onto a single factor. The PROMIS measures were moderately correlated with their respective comparison measures (r = .69 to .76). The PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression measures were highly correlated to one another (r = .91). Findings highlight the potential utility of these PROMIS measures in veterans following orthopedic surgery and the overlap between the PROMIS depression and anxiety measures in this sample.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-2787</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3918</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0163278719856406</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31195828</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Acceptance and commitment therapy ; Anxiety ; Anxiety disorders ; Bone surgery ; Clinical trials ; Depression (Psychology) ; Efficacy ; Generalized anxiety disorder ; Health administration ; Health technology assessment ; Information systems ; Measurement ; Mental depression ; Orthopedic surgery ; Orthopedics ; Pain ; Reliability ; Surgery ; Validity ; Veterans</subject><ispartof>Evaluation & the health professions, 2020-12, Vol.43 (4), p.207-212</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-99bbfce6377a19e3867f0c7438550019b9bfbb0c6b67726440cb8c035116cd8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-99bbfce6377a19e3867f0c7438550019b9bfbb0c6b67726440cb8c035116cd8c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0513-4609</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0163278719856406$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0163278719856406$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31195828$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hadlandsmyth, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dindo, Lilian N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Marie, Barbara J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wajid, Roohina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Embree, Jennie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noiseux, Nicolas O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripp-Reimer, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, M. Bridget</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakel, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><title>Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments: Reliability and Validity in Veterans Following Orthopedic Surgery</title><title>Evaluation & the health professions</title><addtitle>Eval Health Prof</addtitle><description>The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) offers standardized assessment measures of clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of select PROMIS measures with U.S. military veterans following orthopedic surgery. Data for the current study were collected as part of a pilot randomized control trial assessing the efficacy of a 1-day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy workshop on persistent postsurgical pain in at-risk veterans undergoing orthopedic surgery. Sixty-seven participants completed surveys 3 months after surgery. Participants completed the following PROMIS instruments: PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 8a, PROMIS Depression Short Form 8b, and PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a. PROMIS measures were compared to the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Scale, and the Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference subscale, respectively. All three PROMIS measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s αs ranged from .93 to .96) and each loaded onto a single factor. The PROMIS measures were moderately correlated with their respective comparison measures (r = .69 to .76). The PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression measures were highly correlated to one another (r = .91). Findings highlight the potential utility of these PROMIS measures in veterans following orthopedic surgery and the overlap between the PROMIS depression and anxiety measures in this sample.</description><subject>Acceptance and commitment therapy</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety disorders</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Depression (Psychology)</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Generalized anxiety disorder</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Veterans</subject><issn>0163-2787</issn><issn>1552-3918</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSMEokNhzwpZYlMWATvxLwskVFEYqdVUM9BtZDs3U1dJPLUd0LwFj4yjKQUqsbKuzneP79EpipcEvyVEiHeY8LoSUhAlGaeYPyoWhLGqrBWRj4vFLJezflQ8i_EGY1IxJp4WRzUhislKLoqflzo5GFO5hp0PCVq0mpL1A0R0ATpOAYasouXY-TBk1I9os48JBnRyuV5dLDdvshZTmGYsvkdr6J02rndpj_TYoivdu3Ye3IiuIEHQY0Rnvu_9Dzdu0Sqka7-D1lm0mcIWwv558aTTfYQXd-9x8e3s09fTL-X56vPy9ON5aSmvUqmUMZ0FXguhiYJactFhK2gtGcs5lVGmMwZbbrgQFacUWyMtrhkh3LbS1sfFh4PvbjIDtDafH3Tf7IIbdNg3XrvmX2V0183Wf2-4wlJInA1O7gyCv50gpmZw0ULf6xH8FJuqoowzStSMvn6A3vgpjDleU1GazSSlLFP4QNngYwzQ3R9DcDPX3TysO6-8-jvE_cLvfjNQHoCot_Dn1_8a_gKAjbTW</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Hadlandsmyth, Katherine</creator><creator>Dindo, Lilian N.</creator><creator>St. Marie, Barbara J.</creator><creator>Wajid, Roohina</creator><creator>Embree, Jennie L.</creator><creator>Noiseux, Nicolas O.</creator><creator>Tripp-Reimer, Toni</creator><creator>Zimmerman, M. Bridget</creator><creator>Rakel, Barbara A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0513-4609</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments: Reliability and Validity in Veterans Following Orthopedic Surgery</title><author>Hadlandsmyth, Katherine ; Dindo, Lilian N. ; St. Marie, Barbara J. ; Wajid, Roohina ; Embree, Jennie L. ; Noiseux, Nicolas O. ; Tripp-Reimer, Toni ; Zimmerman, M. Bridget ; Rakel, Barbara A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-99bbfce6377a19e3867f0c7438550019b9bfbb0c6b67726440cb8c035116cd8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acceptance and commitment therapy</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety disorders</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Depression (Psychology)</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Generalized anxiety disorder</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Veterans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hadlandsmyth, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dindo, Lilian N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Marie, Barbara J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wajid, Roohina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Embree, Jennie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noiseux, Nicolas O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripp-Reimer, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, M. Bridget</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakel, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Evaluation & the health professions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hadlandsmyth, Katherine</au><au>Dindo, Lilian N.</au><au>St. Marie, Barbara J.</au><au>Wajid, Roohina</au><au>Embree, Jennie L.</au><au>Noiseux, Nicolas O.</au><au>Tripp-Reimer, Toni</au><au>Zimmerman, M. Bridget</au><au>Rakel, Barbara A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments: Reliability and Validity in Veterans Following Orthopedic Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation & the health professions</jtitle><addtitle>Eval Health Prof</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>207-212</pages><issn>0163-2787</issn><eissn>1552-3918</eissn><abstract>The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) offers standardized assessment measures of clinically relevant patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of select PROMIS measures with U.S. military veterans following orthopedic surgery. Data for the current study were collected as part of a pilot randomized control trial assessing the efficacy of a 1-day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy workshop on persistent postsurgical pain in at-risk veterans undergoing orthopedic surgery. Sixty-seven participants completed surveys 3 months after surgery. Participants completed the following PROMIS instruments: PROMIS Anxiety Short Form 8a, PROMIS Depression Short Form 8b, and PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form 8a. PROMIS measures were compared to the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Scale, and the Brief Pain Inventory Pain Interference subscale, respectively. All three PROMIS measures demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s αs ranged from .93 to .96) and each loaded onto a single factor. The PROMIS measures were moderately correlated with their respective comparison measures (r = .69 to .76). The PROMIS anxiety and PROMIS depression measures were highly correlated to one another (r = .91). Findings highlight the potential utility of these PROMIS measures in veterans following orthopedic surgery and the overlap between the PROMIS depression and anxiety measures in this sample.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31195828</pmid><doi>10.1177/0163278719856406</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0513-4609</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0163-2787 |
ispartof | Evaluation & the health professions, 2020-12, Vol.43 (4), p.207-212 |
issn | 0163-2787 1552-3918 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6908780 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete |
subjects | Acceptance and commitment therapy Anxiety Anxiety disorders Bone surgery Clinical trials Depression (Psychology) Efficacy Generalized anxiety disorder Health administration Health technology assessment Information systems Measurement Mental depression Orthopedic surgery Orthopedics Pain Reliability Surgery Validity Veterans |
title | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Instruments: Reliability and Validity in Veterans Following Orthopedic Surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T11%3A32%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient-Reported%20Outcomes%20Measurement%20Information%20System%20(PROMIS)%20Instruments:%20Reliability%20and%20Validity%20in%20Veterans%20Following%20Orthopedic%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20&%20the%20health%20professions&rft.au=Hadlandsmyth,%20Katherine&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=207-212&rft.issn=0163-2787&rft.eissn=1552-3918&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0163278719856406&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2447808445%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447808445&rft_id=info:pmid/31195828&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0163278719856406&rfr_iscdi=true |