Assessing Research Activity and Capacity of Community-Based Organizations: Refinement of the CREAT Instrument Using the Delphi Method
Community-based organizations (CBOs) are essential partners in community-engaged research, yet little is known about their research capacity. Community experts and organizations bring unique knowledge of the community to research partnerships, but standard validated measures of CBO research capacity...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of urban health 2019-12, Vol.96 (6), p.912-922 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 922 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 912 |
| container_title | Journal of urban health |
| container_volume | 96 |
| creator | Humphries, Debbie Ma, Maria Collins, Nicole Ray, Natasha Wat, Eric Bazelon, Jill Pettinelli, Jim Fiellin, David A. |
| description | Community-based organizations (CBOs) are essential partners in community-engaged research, yet little is known about their research capacity. Community experts and organizations bring unique knowledge of the community to research partnerships, but standard validated measures of CBO research capacity do not yet exist. We report here on the refinement through a structured Delphi panel of a previously developed and piloted framework of CBO research capacity and an accompanying instrument, the
C
ommunity
RE
search
A
ctivity Assessment
T
ool (CREAT). A Delphi panel composed of twenty-three experts recruited from community (52%) and academic researchers (48%) from around the USA participated in five rounds of review to establish consensus regarding framework domains, operational definitions, and tool items. Panelists rated the importance of items on a 5-point Likert scale and assessed for the inclusion and language of items. Initial rounds of review began with reviewing the framework and definitions, with subsequent rounds including review of the full instrument. Concluding rounds brought back items that had not yet reached consensus for additional review. Median response values (MRV) and intra-quartile ranges (IQR) were calculated for each Likert item. Items with an MRV > 3.5 were deemed as having reached consensus and were retained. Language changes were made for items with MRV > 2.0 and 1.5. Items with MRV
75%). Consensus was achieved for the inclusion of all domains, subdomains and operational definitions except “evidence-based practices.” Extensive changes to the CREAT instrument were made for clarification, to provide additional detail and to ensure applicability for CBOs. The CREAT framework and tool was refined through input from community and academic researchers. Availability of a validated tool to assess research capacity of CBOs will support targeted research capacity building for community organizations and partners, thus strengthening collaborations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11524-019-00374-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6904697</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2265795156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a6b9904483afb3e7ca7388a5a94b4b009f0483da5311b29c52ed9fd7e5370f853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1TAQjRCIPuAHWKBIbNiE-u2YBdJtKG2lokpVu7acZHLjKrEvdlKp7PnvOve25bFg5RmfM-fM6GTZO4w-YYTkUcSYE1YgrAqEqEzVi2wfM1EWpBTqZaqRUgVlAu1lBzHeIoQFk-R1tkcx5UgSvp_9WsUIMVq3zq8ggglNn6-ayd7Z6T43rs0rszHN0vgur_w4zi41xbGJ0OaXYW2c_Wkm6138nAQ662AENy3kqYe8ujpZXefnLk5h3v7fbJ0W6CsMm97m32Hqffsme9WZIcLbx_cwu_l2cl2dFReXp-fV6qJomGRTYUStFGKspKarKcjGSFqWhhvFalYjpDqUsNZwinFNVMMJtKprJXAqUVdyeph92elu5nqEtkkrBTPoTbCjCffaG6v_Rpzt9drfaZFshZJJ4OOjQPA_ZoiTHm1sYBiMAz9HTYjgUnHMRaJ--Id66-fg0nkLizFJBVk2IjtWE3yMAbrnZTDSS8p6l7JOKettyhqlofd_nvE88hRrItAdISbIrSH89v6P7APxdbQh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2264473625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Research Activity and Capacity of Community-Based Organizations: Refinement of the CREAT Instrument Using the Delphi Method</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Humphries, Debbie ; Ma, Maria ; Collins, Nicole ; Ray, Natasha ; Wat, Eric ; Bazelon, Jill ; Pettinelli, Jim ; Fiellin, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Humphries, Debbie ; Ma, Maria ; Collins, Nicole ; Ray, Natasha ; Wat, Eric ; Bazelon, Jill ; Pettinelli, Jim ; Fiellin, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>Community-based organizations (CBOs) are essential partners in community-engaged research, yet little is known about their research capacity. Community experts and organizations bring unique knowledge of the community to research partnerships, but standard validated measures of CBO research capacity do not yet exist. We report here on the refinement through a structured Delphi panel of a previously developed and piloted framework of CBO research capacity and an accompanying instrument, the
C
ommunity
RE
search
A
ctivity Assessment
T
ool (CREAT). A Delphi panel composed of twenty-three experts recruited from community (52%) and academic researchers (48%) from around the USA participated in five rounds of review to establish consensus regarding framework domains, operational definitions, and tool items. Panelists rated the importance of items on a 5-point Likert scale and assessed for the inclusion and language of items. Initial rounds of review began with reviewing the framework and definitions, with subsequent rounds including review of the full instrument. Concluding rounds brought back items that had not yet reached consensus for additional review. Median response values (MRV) and intra-quartile ranges (IQR) were calculated for each Likert item. Items with an MRV > 3.5 were deemed as having reached consensus and were retained. Language changes were made for items with MRV > 2.0 and < 3.5 and an IQR > 1.5. Items with MRV < 2.0 were excluded from the final tool. Panelist response rate was high (
>
75%). Consensus was achieved for the inclusion of all domains, subdomains and operational definitions except “evidence-based practices.” Extensive changes to the CREAT instrument were made for clarification, to provide additional detail and to ensure applicability for CBOs. The CREAT framework and tool was refined through input from community and academic researchers. Availability of a validated tool to assess research capacity of CBOs will support targeted research capacity building for community organizations and partners, thus strengthening collaborations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-3460</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2869</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11524-019-00374-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31350725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Capacity development ; Community organizations ; Delphi method ; Domains ; Epidemiology ; Health Informatics ; Language ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Organizations ; Participatory research ; Partnerships ; Public Health ; Researchers ; Reviews</subject><ispartof>Journal of urban health, 2019-12, Vol.96 (6), p.912-922</ispartof><rights>The New York Academy of Medicine 2019</rights><rights>Journal of Urban Health is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a6b9904483afb3e7ca7388a5a94b4b009f0483da5311b29c52ed9fd7e5370f853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a6b9904483afb3e7ca7388a5a94b4b009f0483da5311b29c52ed9fd7e5370f853</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5979-3717</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11524-019-00374-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11524-019-00374-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31350725$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Humphries, Debbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wat, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bazelon, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettinelli, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiellin, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Research Activity and Capacity of Community-Based Organizations: Refinement of the CREAT Instrument Using the Delphi Method</title><title>Journal of urban health</title><addtitle>J Urban Health</addtitle><addtitle>J Urban Health</addtitle><description>Community-based organizations (CBOs) are essential partners in community-engaged research, yet little is known about their research capacity. Community experts and organizations bring unique knowledge of the community to research partnerships, but standard validated measures of CBO research capacity do not yet exist. We report here on the refinement through a structured Delphi panel of a previously developed and piloted framework of CBO research capacity and an accompanying instrument, the
C
ommunity
RE
search
A
ctivity Assessment
T
ool (CREAT). A Delphi panel composed of twenty-three experts recruited from community (52%) and academic researchers (48%) from around the USA participated in five rounds of review to establish consensus regarding framework domains, operational definitions, and tool items. Panelists rated the importance of items on a 5-point Likert scale and assessed for the inclusion and language of items. Initial rounds of review began with reviewing the framework and definitions, with subsequent rounds including review of the full instrument. Concluding rounds brought back items that had not yet reached consensus for additional review. Median response values (MRV) and intra-quartile ranges (IQR) were calculated for each Likert item. Items with an MRV > 3.5 were deemed as having reached consensus and were retained. Language changes were made for items with MRV > 2.0 and < 3.5 and an IQR > 1.5. Items with MRV < 2.0 were excluded from the final tool. Panelist response rate was high (
>
75%). Consensus was achieved for the inclusion of all domains, subdomains and operational definitions except “evidence-based practices.” Extensive changes to the CREAT instrument were made for clarification, to provide additional detail and to ensure applicability for CBOs. The CREAT framework and tool was refined through input from community and academic researchers. Availability of a validated tool to assess research capacity of CBOs will support targeted research capacity building for community organizations and partners, thus strengthening collaborations.</description><subject>Capacity development</subject><subject>Community organizations</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Domains</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Health Informatics</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Participatory research</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><issn>1099-3460</issn><issn>1468-2869</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uctu1TAQjRCIPuAHWKBIbNiE-u2YBdJtKG2lokpVu7acZHLjKrEvdlKp7PnvOve25bFg5RmfM-fM6GTZO4w-YYTkUcSYE1YgrAqEqEzVi2wfM1EWpBTqZaqRUgVlAu1lBzHeIoQFk-R1tkcx5UgSvp_9WsUIMVq3zq8ggglNn6-ayd7Z6T43rs0rszHN0vgur_w4zi41xbGJ0OaXYW2c_Wkm6138nAQ662AENy3kqYe8ujpZXefnLk5h3v7fbJ0W6CsMm97m32Hqffsme9WZIcLbx_cwu_l2cl2dFReXp-fV6qJomGRTYUStFGKspKarKcjGSFqWhhvFalYjpDqUsNZwinFNVMMJtKprJXAqUVdyeph92elu5nqEtkkrBTPoTbCjCffaG6v_Rpzt9drfaZFshZJJ4OOjQPA_ZoiTHm1sYBiMAz9HTYjgUnHMRaJ--Id66-fg0nkLizFJBVk2IjtWE3yMAbrnZTDSS8p6l7JOKettyhqlofd_nvE88hRrItAdISbIrSH89v6P7APxdbQh</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Humphries, Debbie</creator><creator>Ma, Maria</creator><creator>Collins, Nicole</creator><creator>Ray, Natasha</creator><creator>Wat, Eric</creator><creator>Bazelon, Jill</creator><creator>Pettinelli, Jim</creator><creator>Fiellin, David A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5979-3717</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Assessing Research Activity and Capacity of Community-Based Organizations: Refinement of the CREAT Instrument Using the Delphi Method</title><author>Humphries, Debbie ; Ma, Maria ; Collins, Nicole ; Ray, Natasha ; Wat, Eric ; Bazelon, Jill ; Pettinelli, Jim ; Fiellin, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-a6b9904483afb3e7ca7388a5a94b4b009f0483da5311b29c52ed9fd7e5370f853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Capacity development</topic><topic>Community organizations</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Domains</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Health Informatics</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Participatory research</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Humphries, Debbie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wat, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bazelon, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettinelli, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiellin, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of urban health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Humphries, Debbie</au><au>Ma, Maria</au><au>Collins, Nicole</au><au>Ray, Natasha</au><au>Wat, Eric</au><au>Bazelon, Jill</au><au>Pettinelli, Jim</au><au>Fiellin, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Research Activity and Capacity of Community-Based Organizations: Refinement of the CREAT Instrument Using the Delphi Method</atitle><jtitle>Journal of urban health</jtitle><stitle>J Urban Health</stitle><addtitle>J Urban Health</addtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>912</spage><epage>922</epage><pages>912-922</pages><issn>1099-3460</issn><eissn>1468-2869</eissn><abstract>Community-based organizations (CBOs) are essential partners in community-engaged research, yet little is known about their research capacity. Community experts and organizations bring unique knowledge of the community to research partnerships, but standard validated measures of CBO research capacity do not yet exist. We report here on the refinement through a structured Delphi panel of a previously developed and piloted framework of CBO research capacity and an accompanying instrument, the
C
ommunity
RE
search
A
ctivity Assessment
T
ool (CREAT). A Delphi panel composed of twenty-three experts recruited from community (52%) and academic researchers (48%) from around the USA participated in five rounds of review to establish consensus regarding framework domains, operational definitions, and tool items. Panelists rated the importance of items on a 5-point Likert scale and assessed for the inclusion and language of items. Initial rounds of review began with reviewing the framework and definitions, with subsequent rounds including review of the full instrument. Concluding rounds brought back items that had not yet reached consensus for additional review. Median response values (MRV) and intra-quartile ranges (IQR) were calculated for each Likert item. Items with an MRV > 3.5 were deemed as having reached consensus and were retained. Language changes were made for items with MRV > 2.0 and < 3.5 and an IQR > 1.5. Items with MRV < 2.0 were excluded from the final tool. Panelist response rate was high (
>
75%). Consensus was achieved for the inclusion of all domains, subdomains and operational definitions except “evidence-based practices.” Extensive changes to the CREAT instrument were made for clarification, to provide additional detail and to ensure applicability for CBOs. The CREAT framework and tool was refined through input from community and academic researchers. Availability of a validated tool to assess research capacity of CBOs will support targeted research capacity building for community organizations and partners, thus strengthening collaborations.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31350725</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11524-019-00374-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5979-3717</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1099-3460 |
| ispartof | Journal of urban health, 2019-12, Vol.96 (6), p.912-922 |
| issn | 1099-3460 1468-2869 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6904697 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Capacity development Community organizations Delphi method Domains Epidemiology Health Informatics Language Medicine Medicine & Public Health Organizations Participatory research Partnerships Public Health Researchers Reviews |
| title | Assessing Research Activity and Capacity of Community-Based Organizations: Refinement of the CREAT Instrument Using the Delphi Method |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T04%3A25%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Research%20Activity%20and%20Capacity%20of%20Community-Based%20Organizations:%20Refinement%20of%20the%20CREAT%20Instrument%20Using%20the%20Delphi%20Method&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20urban%20health&rft.au=Humphries,%20Debbie&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=912&rft.epage=922&rft.pages=912-922&rft.issn=1099-3460&rft.eissn=1468-2869&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11524-019-00374-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2265795156%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2264473625&rft_id=info:pmid/31350725&rfr_iscdi=true |