Residual convolutional neural network for predicting response of transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma from CT imaging
Background We attempted to train and validate a model of deep learning for the preoperative prediction of the response of patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Method All computed tomography (CT) images were acquired for 56...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European radiology 2020-01, Vol.30 (1), p.413-424 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 424 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 413 |
container_title | European radiology |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Peng, Jie Kang, Shuai Ning, Zhengyuan Deng, Hangxia Shen, Jingxian Xu, Yikai Zhang, Jing Zhao, Wei Li, Xinling Gong, Wuxing Huang, Jinhua Liu, Li |
description | Background
We attempted to train and validate a model of deep learning for the preoperative prediction of the response of patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).
Method
All computed tomography (CT) images were acquired for 562 patients from the Nan Fang Hospital (NFH), 89 patients from Zhu Hai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University (ZHHAJU), and 138 patients from the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYUCC). We built a predictive model from the outputs using the transfer learning techniques of a residual convolutional neural network (ResNet50). The prediction accuracy for each patch was revaluated in two independent validation cohorts.
Results
In the training set (NFH), the deep learning model had an accuracy of 84.3% and areas under curves (AUCs) of 0.97, 0.96, 0.95, and 0.96 for complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD), respectively. In the other two validation sets (ZHHAJU and SYUCC), the deep learning model had accuracies of 85.1% and 82.8% for CR, PR, SD, and PD. The ResNet50 model also had high AUCs for predicting the objective response of TACE therapy in patches and patients of three cohorts. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the ResNet50 model had a high net benefit in the two validation cohorts.
Conclusion
The deep learning model presented a good performance for predicting the response of TACE therapy and could help clinicians in better screening patients with HCC who can benefit from the interventional treatment.
Key Points
• Therapy response of TACE can be predicted by a deep learning model based on CT images.
• The probability value from a trained or validation deep learning model showed significant correlation with different therapy responses.
• Further improvement is necessary before clinical utilization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00330-019-06318-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6890698</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2321666703</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-11117b0ebde2584e65a92d053827ba4101af8484d848006e8e67530cff8d1dcc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2PFCEQhonRuOPoH_BgSLx4aS2gm4aLiZn4lWxiYtYzoenqGdZuaKF7jf4Gf7TMzrp-HORAhdRbT1XxEvKYwXMG0L7IAEJABUxXIAVTFbtDNqwWvGKg6rtkA1qoqtW6PiMPcr4EAM3q9j45E0wI3jRqQ358xOz71Y7UxXAVx3XxMZRXwDVdh-VrTJ_pEBOdE_beLT7sacI8x5CRxoEuyYZs04LJHykHnCJOXRz9d3tkUR_oAWe7RIfjuI42UWeT8yFOlg4pTnR3Qf1k94X7kNwb7Jjx0U3ckk9vXl_s3lXnH96-3706r1xTw1KxctoOsOuRN6pG2VjNe2iE4m1nawbMDqpWdV8uAIkKZdsIcMOgetY7J7bk5Yk7r92EvcNQlhjNnMoc6ZuJ1pu_M8EfzD5eGak0SK0K4NkNIMUvK-bFTD4f97MB45oNF5xJKdviz5Y8_Ud6GddUvriouGRaQ8tlUfGTyqWYc8LhdhgG5mi2OZltitnm2mzDStGTP9e4LfnlbhGIkyCXVNhj-t37P9ifVVO5Pw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261990726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Residual convolutional neural network for predicting response of transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma from CT imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Online Journals Complete</source><creator>Peng, Jie ; Kang, Shuai ; Ning, Zhengyuan ; Deng, Hangxia ; Shen, Jingxian ; Xu, Yikai ; Zhang, Jing ; Zhao, Wei ; Li, Xinling ; Gong, Wuxing ; Huang, Jinhua ; Liu, Li</creator><creatorcontrib>Peng, Jie ; Kang, Shuai ; Ning, Zhengyuan ; Deng, Hangxia ; Shen, Jingxian ; Xu, Yikai ; Zhang, Jing ; Zhao, Wei ; Li, Xinling ; Gong, Wuxing ; Huang, Jinhua ; Liu, Li</creatorcontrib><description>Background
We attempted to train and validate a model of deep learning for the preoperative prediction of the response of patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).
Method
All computed tomography (CT) images were acquired for 562 patients from the Nan Fang Hospital (NFH), 89 patients from Zhu Hai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University (ZHHAJU), and 138 patients from the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYUCC). We built a predictive model from the outputs using the transfer learning techniques of a residual convolutional neural network (ResNet50). The prediction accuracy for each patch was revaluated in two independent validation cohorts.
Results
In the training set (NFH), the deep learning model had an accuracy of 84.3% and areas under curves (AUCs) of 0.97, 0.96, 0.95, and 0.96 for complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD), respectively. In the other two validation sets (ZHHAJU and SYUCC), the deep learning model had accuracies of 85.1% and 82.8% for CR, PR, SD, and PD. The ResNet50 model also had high AUCs for predicting the objective response of TACE therapy in patches and patients of three cohorts. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the ResNet50 model had a high net benefit in the two validation cohorts.
Conclusion
The deep learning model presented a good performance for predicting the response of TACE therapy and could help clinicians in better screening patients with HCC who can benefit from the interventional treatment.
Key Points
• Therapy response of TACE can be predicted by a deep learning model based on CT images.
• The probability value from a trained or validation deep learning model showed significant correlation with different therapy responses.
• Further improvement is necessary before clinical utilization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06318-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31332558</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Artificial neural networks ; Cancer ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - therapy ; Chemoembolization ; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic ; Computed Tomography ; Decision analysis ; Deep Learning ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Disease Progression ; Female ; Hepatocellular carcinoma ; Humans ; Image acquisition ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Liver cancer ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Liver Neoplasms - pathology ; Liver Neoplasms - therapy ; Machine learning ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Model accuracy ; Neural networks ; Neuroradiology ; Patients ; Performance prediction ; Prediction models ; Radiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Therapy ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Transfer learning ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2020-01, Vol.30 (1), p.413-424</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>European Radiology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-11117b0ebde2584e65a92d053827ba4101af8484d848006e8e67530cff8d1dcc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-11117b0ebde2584e65a92d053827ba4101af8484d848006e8e67530cff8d1dcc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-019-06318-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-019-06318-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31332558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peng, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Zhengyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Hangxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Jingxian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yikai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Wuxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jinhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Li</creatorcontrib><title>Residual convolutional neural network for predicting response of transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma from CT imaging</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Background
We attempted to train and validate a model of deep learning for the preoperative prediction of the response of patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).
Method
All computed tomography (CT) images were acquired for 562 patients from the Nan Fang Hospital (NFH), 89 patients from Zhu Hai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University (ZHHAJU), and 138 patients from the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYUCC). We built a predictive model from the outputs using the transfer learning techniques of a residual convolutional neural network (ResNet50). The prediction accuracy for each patch was revaluated in two independent validation cohorts.
Results
In the training set (NFH), the deep learning model had an accuracy of 84.3% and areas under curves (AUCs) of 0.97, 0.96, 0.95, and 0.96 for complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD), respectively. In the other two validation sets (ZHHAJU and SYUCC), the deep learning model had accuracies of 85.1% and 82.8% for CR, PR, SD, and PD. The ResNet50 model also had high AUCs for predicting the objective response of TACE therapy in patches and patients of three cohorts. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the ResNet50 model had a high net benefit in the two validation cohorts.
Conclusion
The deep learning model presented a good performance for predicting the response of TACE therapy and could help clinicians in better screening patients with HCC who can benefit from the interventional treatment.
Key Points
• Therapy response of TACE can be predicted by a deep learning model based on CT images.
• The probability value from a trained or validation deep learning model showed significant correlation with different therapy responses.
• Further improvement is necessary before clinical utilization.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - therapy</subject><subject>Chemoembolization</subject><subject>Chemoembolization, Therapeutic</subject><subject>Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatocellular carcinoma</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Transfer learning</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2PFCEQhonRuOPoH_BgSLx4aS2gm4aLiZn4lWxiYtYzoenqGdZuaKF7jf4Gf7TMzrp-HORAhdRbT1XxEvKYwXMG0L7IAEJABUxXIAVTFbtDNqwWvGKg6rtkA1qoqtW6PiMPcr4EAM3q9j45E0wI3jRqQ358xOz71Y7UxXAVx3XxMZRXwDVdh-VrTJ_pEBOdE_beLT7sacI8x5CRxoEuyYZs04LJHykHnCJOXRz9d3tkUR_oAWe7RIfjuI42UWeT8yFOlg4pTnR3Qf1k94X7kNwb7Jjx0U3ckk9vXl_s3lXnH96-3706r1xTw1KxctoOsOuRN6pG2VjNe2iE4m1nawbMDqpWdV8uAIkKZdsIcMOgetY7J7bk5Yk7r92EvcNQlhjNnMoc6ZuJ1pu_M8EfzD5eGak0SK0K4NkNIMUvK-bFTD4f97MB45oNF5xJKdviz5Y8_Ud6GddUvriouGRaQ8tlUfGTyqWYc8LhdhgG5mi2OZltitnm2mzDStGTP9e4LfnlbhGIkyCXVNhj-t37P9ifVVO5Pw</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Peng, Jie</creator><creator>Kang, Shuai</creator><creator>Ning, Zhengyuan</creator><creator>Deng, Hangxia</creator><creator>Shen, Jingxian</creator><creator>Xu, Yikai</creator><creator>Zhang, Jing</creator><creator>Zhao, Wei</creator><creator>Li, Xinling</creator><creator>Gong, Wuxing</creator><creator>Huang, Jinhua</creator><creator>Liu, Li</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Residual convolutional neural network for predicting response of transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma from CT imaging</title><author>Peng, Jie ; Kang, Shuai ; Ning, Zhengyuan ; Deng, Hangxia ; Shen, Jingxian ; Xu, Yikai ; Zhang, Jing ; Zhao, Wei ; Li, Xinling ; Gong, Wuxing ; Huang, Jinhua ; Liu, Li</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-11117b0ebde2584e65a92d053827ba4101af8484d848006e8e67530cff8d1dcc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - therapy</topic><topic>Chemoembolization</topic><topic>Chemoembolization, Therapeutic</topic><topic>Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatocellular carcinoma</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Transfer learning</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peng, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Shuai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Zhengyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Hangxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Jingxian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yikai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Wuxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jinhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Li</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peng, Jie</au><au>Kang, Shuai</au><au>Ning, Zhengyuan</au><au>Deng, Hangxia</au><au>Shen, Jingxian</au><au>Xu, Yikai</au><au>Zhang, Jing</au><au>Zhao, Wei</au><au>Li, Xinling</au><au>Gong, Wuxing</au><au>Huang, Jinhua</au><au>Liu, Li</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Residual convolutional neural network for predicting response of transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma from CT imaging</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>413</spage><epage>424</epage><pages>413-424</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Background
We attempted to train and validate a model of deep learning for the preoperative prediction of the response of patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).
Method
All computed tomography (CT) images were acquired for 562 patients from the Nan Fang Hospital (NFH), 89 patients from Zhu Hai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University (ZHHAJU), and 138 patients from the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYUCC). We built a predictive model from the outputs using the transfer learning techniques of a residual convolutional neural network (ResNet50). The prediction accuracy for each patch was revaluated in two independent validation cohorts.
Results
In the training set (NFH), the deep learning model had an accuracy of 84.3% and areas under curves (AUCs) of 0.97, 0.96, 0.95, and 0.96 for complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD), respectively. In the other two validation sets (ZHHAJU and SYUCC), the deep learning model had accuracies of 85.1% and 82.8% for CR, PR, SD, and PD. The ResNet50 model also had high AUCs for predicting the objective response of TACE therapy in patches and patients of three cohorts. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the ResNet50 model had a high net benefit in the two validation cohorts.
Conclusion
The deep learning model presented a good performance for predicting the response of TACE therapy and could help clinicians in better screening patients with HCC who can benefit from the interventional treatment.
Key Points
• Therapy response of TACE can be predicted by a deep learning model based on CT images.
• The probability value from a trained or validation deep learning model showed significant correlation with different therapy responses.
• Further improvement is necessary before clinical utilization.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31332558</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-019-06318-1</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-7994 |
ispartof | European radiology, 2020-01, Vol.30 (1), p.413-424 |
issn | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6890698 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Online Journals Complete |
subjects | Artificial intelligence Artificial neural networks Cancer Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnostic imaging Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - therapy Chemoembolization Chemoembolization, Therapeutic Computed Tomography Decision analysis Deep Learning Diagnostic Radiology Disease Progression Female Hepatocellular carcinoma Humans Image acquisition Imaging Internal Medicine Interventional Radiology Liver cancer Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Liver Neoplasms - pathology Liver Neoplasms - therapy Machine learning Male Medical imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Model accuracy Neural networks Neuroradiology Patients Performance prediction Prediction models Radiology Retrospective Studies Therapy Tomography, X-Ray Computed Transfer learning Ultrasound |
title | Residual convolutional neural network for predicting response of transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma from CT imaging |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A57%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Residual%20convolutional%20neural%20network%20for%20predicting%20response%20of%20transarterial%20chemoembolization%20in%20hepatocellular%20carcinoma%20from%20CT%20imaging&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Peng,%20Jie&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=413&rft.epage=424&rft.pages=413-424&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-019-06318-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2321666703%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261990726&rft_id=info:pmid/31332558&rfr_iscdi=true |