Use of a Combined Laryngo-Bronchoscopy Approach in Difficult Airways Management: A Pilot Simulation Study

There are several airway devices available for difficult tracheal intubation (DTI) management, but the failure rate remains high. The use of laryngoscopy to facilitate the fibreoptic-bronchoscope intubation (CLBI) has been increasingly reported in DTI situations, but it has not been formally studied...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation 2019-12, Vol.47 (6), p.464-470
Hauptverfasser: Sanfilippo, Filippo, Sgalambro, Francesco, Chiaramonte, Giuseppe, Santonocito, Cristina, Burgio, Gaetano, Arcadipane, Antonio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 470
container_issue 6
container_start_page 464
container_title Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation
container_volume 47
creator Sanfilippo, Filippo
Sgalambro, Francesco
Chiaramonte, Giuseppe
Santonocito, Cristina
Burgio, Gaetano
Arcadipane, Antonio
description There are several airway devices available for difficult tracheal intubation (DTI) management, but the failure rate remains high. The use of laryngoscopy to facilitate the fibreoptic-bronchoscope intubation (CLBI) has been increasingly reported in DTI situations, but it has not been formally studied yet. We designed a single-centre simulation study on DTI (neck rigidity and tongue oedema) comparing three techniques: direct laryngoscopy (DL), video-laryngoscopy (VLS) and CLBI. Eighteen anaesthesiologists naïve to VLS/CLBI approaches, participated in the study. The primary outcome was the intubation rate at the first attempt. Secondary outcomes were an overall time-to-intubate (TTI) and time-to-ventilate (TTV), success at the second and third attempt and ease of intubation as evaluated by a subjective 5-point Likert scale. The CLBI technique had a higher success rate at the first attempt than DL (66% vs 22%, p=0.007), while VLS did not (44%, p=0.16). A trend towards higher success at the third attempt was found for both VLS and CLBI vs DL (p=0.07 and p=0.06, respectively). The VLS had a shorter overall TTV than DL (88±60 vs 121±59 sec, respectively, p=0.04) and a trend towards a shorter TTI (81±61 vs 116±64 sec, respectively, p=0.06). The CLBI approach showed a non-significantly lower TTI/TTV as compared to DL (p=0.10 and p=0.16, respectively). Anaesthesiologists judged that the intubation with VLS (3.7±1.0) and CLBI (3.8±1.0) was easier than with DL (1.7±0.8, both p
doi_str_mv 10.5152/TJAR.2019.99234
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6886816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2548818131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-373b854b1058205069c0ee094293a0bae3d7d535b93bd845581c8b0069bc6e483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkVtL5DAYhoO4qKjXeycBrzuTY5t6IdTRPciIy6rgXUjSdCbSJjVpd5l_v531gF7lgzx5vzc8AHzFaMYxJ_P76-r3jCBczsqSULYDDkieF1lOC7T7NhfF4z44TslpxBkjE033wD7FggjC6AFwD8nC0EAFF6HTztsaLlXc-FXILmLwZh2SCf0GVn0fgzJr6Dy8dE3jzNgOsHLxr9okeKO8WtnO-uEMVvCXa8MA71w3tmpwwcO7Yaw3R-BLo9pkj1_PQ_Dw7ep-8SNb3n7_uaiWmWEEDxktqBacaYy4IIijvDTIWlQyUlKFtLK0LmpOuS6prgXjXGAjNJo4bXLLBD0E5y-5_ag7W5upVFSt7KPrpo_JoJz8fOPdWq7CH5kLkQucTwGnrwExPI82DfIpjNFPnSXhTAgsMMUTNX-hTAwpRdu8b8BIbvXIrR651SP_65lenHws9s6_yaD_AM5pi3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548818131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of a Combined Laryngo-Bronchoscopy Approach in Difficult Airways Management: A Pilot Simulation Study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sanfilippo, Filippo ; Sgalambro, Francesco ; Chiaramonte, Giuseppe ; Santonocito, Cristina ; Burgio, Gaetano ; Arcadipane, Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanfilippo, Filippo ; Sgalambro, Francesco ; Chiaramonte, Giuseppe ; Santonocito, Cristina ; Burgio, Gaetano ; Arcadipane, Antonio ; “renato Fiandaca” Simulation Center, Irccs-ismett (istituto Mediterraneo Per I Trapianti E Terapie Ad Alta Specializzazione), Palermo, Italy ; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Irccs-ismett (istituto Mediterraneo Per I Trapianti E Terapie Ad Alta Specializzazione), Palermo, Italy ; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Istituto Oncologico Del Mediterraneo (iom), Viagrande, Italy</creatorcontrib><description>There are several airway devices available for difficult tracheal intubation (DTI) management, but the failure rate remains high. The use of laryngoscopy to facilitate the fibreoptic-bronchoscope intubation (CLBI) has been increasingly reported in DTI situations, but it has not been formally studied yet. We designed a single-centre simulation study on DTI (neck rigidity and tongue oedema) comparing three techniques: direct laryngoscopy (DL), video-laryngoscopy (VLS) and CLBI. Eighteen anaesthesiologists naïve to VLS/CLBI approaches, participated in the study. The primary outcome was the intubation rate at the first attempt. Secondary outcomes were an overall time-to-intubate (TTI) and time-to-ventilate (TTV), success at the second and third attempt and ease of intubation as evaluated by a subjective 5-point Likert scale. The CLBI technique had a higher success rate at the first attempt than DL (66% vs 22%, p=0.007), while VLS did not (44%, p=0.16). A trend towards higher success at the third attempt was found for both VLS and CLBI vs DL (p=0.07 and p=0.06, respectively). The VLS had a shorter overall TTV than DL (88±60 vs 121±59 sec, respectively, p=0.04) and a trend towards a shorter TTI (81±61 vs 116±64 sec, respectively, p=0.06). The CLBI approach showed a non-significantly lower TTI/TTV as compared to DL (p=0.10 and p=0.16, respectively). Anaesthesiologists judged that the intubation with VLS (3.7±1.0) and CLBI (3.8±1.0) was easier than with DL (1.7±0.8, both p&lt;0.001). In a simulated DTI scenario, CLBI had a higher success rate at the first attempt than DL, while VLS did not. By the third attempt, both rescue techniques had a trend towards a higher success rate than DL. The CLBI technique seems a promising alternative for the management of DTI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2667-677X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2667-6370</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.99234</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31828243</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Aves Yayincilik Ltd. STI</publisher><subject>Edema ; Intubation ; Laryngoscopy ; Original ; Success</subject><ispartof>Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2019-12, Vol.47 (6), p.464-470</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2019 by Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society.</rights><rights>2019. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://turkjanaesthesiolreanim.org/en/aims-and-scope-1027</rights><rights>Copyright 2019 by Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-373b854b1058205069c0ee094293a0bae3d7d535b93bd845581c8b0069bc6e483</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-8823-7253 ; 0000-0001-6876-6561 ; 0000-0001-6521-3806 ; 0000-0001-7294-7613 ; 0000-0001-5144-0776 ; 0000-0002-4213-9153</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886816/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6886816/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31828243$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanfilippo, Filippo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sgalambro, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiaramonte, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santonocito, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgio, Gaetano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcadipane, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>“renato Fiandaca” Simulation Center, Irccs-ismett (istituto Mediterraneo Per I Trapianti E Terapie Ad Alta Specializzazione), Palermo, Italy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Irccs-ismett (istituto Mediterraneo Per I Trapianti E Terapie Ad Alta Specializzazione), Palermo, Italy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Istituto Oncologico Del Mediterraneo (iom), Viagrande, Italy</creatorcontrib><title>Use of a Combined Laryngo-Bronchoscopy Approach in Difficult Airways Management: A Pilot Simulation Study</title><title>Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation</title><addtitle>Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim</addtitle><description>There are several airway devices available for difficult tracheal intubation (DTI) management, but the failure rate remains high. The use of laryngoscopy to facilitate the fibreoptic-bronchoscope intubation (CLBI) has been increasingly reported in DTI situations, but it has not been formally studied yet. We designed a single-centre simulation study on DTI (neck rigidity and tongue oedema) comparing three techniques: direct laryngoscopy (DL), video-laryngoscopy (VLS) and CLBI. Eighteen anaesthesiologists naïve to VLS/CLBI approaches, participated in the study. The primary outcome was the intubation rate at the first attempt. Secondary outcomes were an overall time-to-intubate (TTI) and time-to-ventilate (TTV), success at the second and third attempt and ease of intubation as evaluated by a subjective 5-point Likert scale. The CLBI technique had a higher success rate at the first attempt than DL (66% vs 22%, p=0.007), while VLS did not (44%, p=0.16). A trend towards higher success at the third attempt was found for both VLS and CLBI vs DL (p=0.07 and p=0.06, respectively). The VLS had a shorter overall TTV than DL (88±60 vs 121±59 sec, respectively, p=0.04) and a trend towards a shorter TTI (81±61 vs 116±64 sec, respectively, p=0.06). The CLBI approach showed a non-significantly lower TTI/TTV as compared to DL (p=0.10 and p=0.16, respectively). Anaesthesiologists judged that the intubation with VLS (3.7±1.0) and CLBI (3.8±1.0) was easier than with DL (1.7±0.8, both p&lt;0.001). In a simulated DTI scenario, CLBI had a higher success rate at the first attempt than DL, while VLS did not. By the third attempt, both rescue techniques had a trend towards a higher success rate than DL. The CLBI technique seems a promising alternative for the management of DTI.</description><subject>Edema</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Laryngoscopy</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>2667-677X</issn><issn>2667-6370</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkVtL5DAYhoO4qKjXeycBrzuTY5t6IdTRPciIy6rgXUjSdCbSJjVpd5l_v531gF7lgzx5vzc8AHzFaMYxJ_P76-r3jCBczsqSULYDDkieF1lOC7T7NhfF4z44TslpxBkjE033wD7FggjC6AFwD8nC0EAFF6HTztsaLlXc-FXILmLwZh2SCf0GVn0fgzJr6Dy8dE3jzNgOsHLxr9okeKO8WtnO-uEMVvCXa8MA71w3tmpwwcO7Yaw3R-BLo9pkj1_PQ_Dw7ep-8SNb3n7_uaiWmWEEDxktqBacaYy4IIijvDTIWlQyUlKFtLK0LmpOuS6prgXjXGAjNJo4bXLLBD0E5y-5_ag7W5upVFSt7KPrpo_JoJz8fOPdWq7CH5kLkQucTwGnrwExPI82DfIpjNFPnSXhTAgsMMUTNX-hTAwpRdu8b8BIbvXIrR651SP_65lenHws9s6_yaD_AM5pi3A</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Sanfilippo, Filippo</creator><creator>Sgalambro, Francesco</creator><creator>Chiaramonte, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Santonocito, Cristina</creator><creator>Burgio, Gaetano</creator><creator>Arcadipane, Antonio</creator><general>Aves Yayincilik Ltd. STI</general><general>Turkish Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8823-7253</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6876-6561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6521-3806</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7294-7613</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-0776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4213-9153</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Use of a Combined Laryngo-Bronchoscopy Approach in Difficult Airways Management: A Pilot Simulation Study</title><author>Sanfilippo, Filippo ; Sgalambro, Francesco ; Chiaramonte, Giuseppe ; Santonocito, Cristina ; Burgio, Gaetano ; Arcadipane, Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-373b854b1058205069c0ee094293a0bae3d7d535b93bd845581c8b0069bc6e483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Edema</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Laryngoscopy</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanfilippo, Filippo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sgalambro, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiaramonte, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santonocito, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgio, Gaetano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcadipane, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>“renato Fiandaca” Simulation Center, Irccs-ismett (istituto Mediterraneo Per I Trapianti E Terapie Ad Alta Specializzazione), Palermo, Italy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Irccs-ismett (istituto Mediterraneo Per I Trapianti E Terapie Ad Alta Specializzazione), Palermo, Italy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Istituto Oncologico Del Mediterraneo (iom), Viagrande, Italy</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanfilippo, Filippo</au><au>Sgalambro, Francesco</au><au>Chiaramonte, Giuseppe</au><au>Santonocito, Cristina</au><au>Burgio, Gaetano</au><au>Arcadipane, Antonio</au><aucorp>“renato Fiandaca” Simulation Center, Irccs-ismett (istituto Mediterraneo Per I Trapianti E Terapie Ad Alta Specializzazione), Palermo, Italy</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Irccs-ismett (istituto Mediterraneo Per I Trapianti E Terapie Ad Alta Specializzazione), Palermo, Italy</aucorp><aucorp>Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Istituto Oncologico Del Mediterraneo (iom), Viagrande, Italy</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of a Combined Laryngo-Bronchoscopy Approach in Difficult Airways Management: A Pilot Simulation Study</atitle><jtitle>Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation</jtitle><addtitle>Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim</addtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>464</spage><epage>470</epage><pages>464-470</pages><issn>2667-677X</issn><eissn>2667-6370</eissn><abstract>There are several airway devices available for difficult tracheal intubation (DTI) management, but the failure rate remains high. The use of laryngoscopy to facilitate the fibreoptic-bronchoscope intubation (CLBI) has been increasingly reported in DTI situations, but it has not been formally studied yet. We designed a single-centre simulation study on DTI (neck rigidity and tongue oedema) comparing three techniques: direct laryngoscopy (DL), video-laryngoscopy (VLS) and CLBI. Eighteen anaesthesiologists naïve to VLS/CLBI approaches, participated in the study. The primary outcome was the intubation rate at the first attempt. Secondary outcomes were an overall time-to-intubate (TTI) and time-to-ventilate (TTV), success at the second and third attempt and ease of intubation as evaluated by a subjective 5-point Likert scale. The CLBI technique had a higher success rate at the first attempt than DL (66% vs 22%, p=0.007), while VLS did not (44%, p=0.16). A trend towards higher success at the third attempt was found for both VLS and CLBI vs DL (p=0.07 and p=0.06, respectively). The VLS had a shorter overall TTV than DL (88±60 vs 121±59 sec, respectively, p=0.04) and a trend towards a shorter TTI (81±61 vs 116±64 sec, respectively, p=0.06). The CLBI approach showed a non-significantly lower TTI/TTV as compared to DL (p=0.10 and p=0.16, respectively). Anaesthesiologists judged that the intubation with VLS (3.7±1.0) and CLBI (3.8±1.0) was easier than with DL (1.7±0.8, both p&lt;0.001). In a simulated DTI scenario, CLBI had a higher success rate at the first attempt than DL, while VLS did not. By the third attempt, both rescue techniques had a trend towards a higher success rate than DL. The CLBI technique seems a promising alternative for the management of DTI.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Aves Yayincilik Ltd. STI</pub><pmid>31828243</pmid><doi>10.5152/TJAR.2019.99234</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8823-7253</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6876-6561</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6521-3806</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7294-7613</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-0776</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4213-9153</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2667-677X
ispartof Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2019-12, Vol.47 (6), p.464-470
issn 2667-677X
2667-6370
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6886816
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Edema
Intubation
Laryngoscopy
Original
Success
title Use of a Combined Laryngo-Bronchoscopy Approach in Difficult Airways Management: A Pilot Simulation Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T19%3A17%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20a%20Combined%20Laryngo-Bronchoscopy%20Approach%20in%20Difficult%20Airways%20Management:%20A%20Pilot%20Simulation%20Study&rft.jtitle=Turkish%20journal%20of%20anaesthesiology%20and%20reanimation&rft.au=Sanfilippo,%20Filippo&rft.aucorp=%E2%80%9Crenato%20Fiandaca%E2%80%9D%20Simulation%20Center,%20Irccs-ismett%20(istituto%20Mediterraneo%20Per%20I%20Trapianti%20E%20Terapie%20Ad%20Alta%20Specializzazione),%20Palermo,%20Italy&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=464&rft.epage=470&rft.pages=464-470&rft.issn=2667-677X&rft.eissn=2667-6370&rft_id=info:doi/10.5152/TJAR.2019.99234&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2548818131%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548818131&rft_id=info:pmid/31828243&rfr_iscdi=true