Neural correlates of noncanonical syntactic processing revealed by a picture-sentence matching task

It remains controversial whether the left inferior frontal gyrus subserves syntactic processing or short‐term memory demands. Here we devised a novel picture‐sentence matching task involving Japanese sentences with different structures to clearly contrast syntactic reanalysis processes. Using event‐...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human brain mapping 2008-09, Vol.29 (9), p.1015-1027
Hauptverfasser: Kinno, Ryuta, Kawamura, Mitsuru, Shioda, Seiji, Sakai, Kuniyoshi L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:It remains controversial whether the left inferior frontal gyrus subserves syntactic processing or short‐term memory demands. Here we devised a novel picture‐sentence matching task involving Japanese sentences with different structures to clearly contrast syntactic reanalysis processes. Using event‐related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), activations under three main conditions were directly compared: a canonical/subject‐initial active sentence (AS), a noncanonical/subject‐initial passive sentence (PS), and a noncanonical/object‐initial scrambled sentence (SS). We found that activation in the dorsal region of the left inferior frontal gyrus (dF3t) was enhanced more by the noncanonical processing under the PS and SS conditions than by the canonical processing under the AS condition, and this enhancement was independent of domain‐general factors, such as general memory demands and task difficulty. Moreover, the left posterior superior/middle temporal gyrus (pSTG/MTG) showed more enhanced responses to object‐initial sentences under the SS condition than to subject‐initial sentences under the AS and PS conditions, which were not significantly affected by task difficulty. Furthermore, activation in the left lateral premotor cortex (LPMC) increased under the AS, PS, and SS conditions, in that order. It is possible that task difficulty affects the left LPMC, but the three distinct activations patterns suggest that these frontal and temporal regions work in concert to process syntactic structures, with their respective contributions dynamically regulated by linguistic requirements. Hum Brain Mapp 2008. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:1065-9471
1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.20441